Ex-Penn St. Coach Sandusky Charged With Homo Sex Abuse of Young Boys

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...ndusky-Accuser-Contacts-Police-134570773.html

Another Possible Sandusky Accuser Contacts Police
Man incarcerated in Oklahoma contacted police about alleged abuse by Jerry Sandusky
Sunday, Nov 27, 2011 | Updated 9:34 PM

Penn State police say they have received a letter from a person who says he may have been “possibly assaulted” by Jerry Sandusky, the ex-defensive coordinator charged with sexually abusing eight boys over a 15-year period.

The Centre Daily Times reported that the letter from a man incarcerated in Oklahoma was received Friday and was sent to the state Attorney General's office, which is continuing its investigation of Sandusky, according to Penn State police Sgt. Bill Wagner.

The grand jury report issued when Sandusky was charged Nov. 5 lists eight purported victims, none identified by name, though at least two more possible accusers' claims are being investigated.

The Attorney General's office did not comment on the letter sent from Oklahoma.
 
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...s-jerry-sandusky-began-abusing-boys-in-1970s/

Attorney: Sandusky Began Abuse In 70’s, Likely Has More Than 100 Victims
December 1, 2011 7:55 AM

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) – The Minnesota-based lawyer who filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Philadelphia on behalf of a new victim of Jerry Sandusky, says he believes the ex-Penn State defensive coach’s alleged misconduct with young boys may stretch back into the 1970s.

A man identified simply as “John Doe A” in the suit alleges Jerry Sandusky molested him at least 100 times during a four-year period from 1992 to 1996, including at least one time in Philadelphia.

There was some resistance at that particular time. Sandusky made a threat to him that nobody would believe him and a threat to his family and he coerced him into some further silence,” says Jeff Anderson, “John Doe A’s” attorney.

The suit says the victim was part of Sandusky’s “Second Mile” program for kids from dysfunctional families and the abuse began when he was 10.

Anderson says he has 28 years of experience representing child-sex abuse victims. He has gained a national reputation for pursuing clergy-sex abuse cases against the Catholic Church.

“Based on experience, on the investigation we have here, what has been revealed publicly that this profile reveals a very dangerous and cunning man who probably has been accessing kids since he founded that charity in ’77 if not before.” That charity, being Second Mile.

The suit names Second Mile, Sandusky and Penn State as defendants.

Anderson says he believes there are many more Sandusky victims. “Anybody that is this predatory and unable to control the sexual impulses and this powerful and cunning has statistically, the research shows, at least a 100 victims.”

Anderson says the victim in the first suit filed in the Penn State scandal is now 29 and no longer lives in Pennsylvania. He says he is now telling his story to police and prosecutors.
 
Considering the felonious Negroes, the nigger-worship and the child-molesting queers, is organized sports REALLY worth it?
 
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/sandusky_says_paterno_never_spoke_z2WISDMnLHlrnQdMsY2hwN

Sandusky: Paterno never spoke to me about suspected misconduct: report

Former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky said Joe Paterno never spoke to him about any suspected misconduct with minors, according to a new report.

Sandusky has been charged with 40 counts of molesting eight boys over 15 years and is free on bail while awaiting a preliminary hearing on Dec. 13 .

Penn State’s board of trustees fired Paterno on Nov. 9 because it felt the football coach didn’t go far enough in alerting authorities after an assistant coach said he told Paterno he saw Sandusky assaulting a young boy in the football building showers in March 2002.


During a lengthy interview at his lawyer's home, Sandusky in an interview with the New York Times painted a picture of chaotic but friendly scenes involving children he described as extended family at his State College, Pa., home. The descriptions sharply contrast the shocking allegations involving children outlined in a grand jury report.

Sandusky told the newspaper he and Paterno never spoke about the alleged 2002 incident or a 1998 child molestation complaint investigated by Penn State campus police.

"I never talked to him about either one," Sandusky said. "That's all I can say. I mean, I don't know." He worked for Paterno for nearly 30 years.

Messages left Saturday by The Associated Press seeking comment from representatives for Paterno were not immediately returned.

Paterno testified before the grand jury looking into the abuse allegations that a graduate assistant told him in 2002 that he witnessed in the team shower in the team locker room, and that he relayed the report to his superior, athletic director Tim Curley.

The graduate assistant later met with Curley and Gary Schultz, a university vice president who oversaw campus police. But authorities said the allegation was not passed on to authorities.

Curley and Schultz are charged with failing to report the 2002 allegation and lying to the grand jury. Curley is on administrative leave, while Schultz has stepped down. Lawyers for both men have said their clients are innocent.

Prosecutors have said Paterno is not a target of the investigation.

Paterno's son, Scott Paterno, told the AP last month the first and only incident reported about Sandusky to Paterno was in 2002. Paterno has said in a statement that specific actions alleged to have occurred in the grand jury report were not relayed to him

Still, the state's top cop criticized the way school leaders handled allegations and said Paterno and other officials had a moral responsibility to do more.

The 84-year-old Paterno initially announced his retirement effective at the end of the season, saying that the scandal was "one of the great sorrows of my life. With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more." The trustees fired him anyway, about 12 hours later.

Sandusky said in the report he never sexually abused any child and that prosecutors have misunderstood his work with children. He described a family and work life that "could often be chaotic, even odd, one that lacked some classic boundaries between adults and children," the Times reported.

He described scenes in which his State College, Pa., home turned into a makeshift recreation center with wrestling matches and sleepovers. Children playing in their home with dogs after football games.

"It was, you know, almost an extended family," Mr. Sandusky said of his household's relationship with children from the charity he founded, The Second Mile. He characterized his experiences with children was close with as "precious times," and said the physical aspect of the relationships "just happened that way."

Allegations involving two victims occurred in Sandusky's home, according to the grand jury report.

"Victim One testified that Sandusky had a practice of coming into the basement room after he told Victim One that it was time to go to bed," the grand jury report said. "Victim One testified that Sandusky would 'crack his back,'" which was described in the report as Sandusky getting on to the bed and "rolling under the boy."

Sandusky told the Times, "They've taken everything that I ever did for any young person and twisted it to say that my motives were sexual or whatever ... I had kid after kid after kid who might say I was a father figure. And they just twisted that all."

He is accused of mining the ranks of his Second Mile charity to find underprivileged boys to abuse. Sandusky also said that the charity never restricted his access to children until he became the subject of a criminal investigation in 2008.

He said he regularly gave money to the disadvantaged boys at his charity, opened bank accounts for them and gave them gifts that had been donated to the charity.

"I tried to reward them sometimes with a little money in hand, just so that they could see something," he said. "But more often than not, I tried to set up, maybe get them to save the money, and I put it directly into a savings account established for them."

The paper said he grew most animated when talking about his relationships with children and most disconsolate when he spoke of Paterno and Penn State, and the upheaval caused by his indictment.

"I don't think it was fair," he is quoted as saying.

During the interview, Sandusky said his relationships and activities with Second Mile children did cause some strain with Paterno. He told the paper he worried that having some children with him at hotels before games or on the sideline during games, could have been regarded as a distraction by Paterno.



Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/nation...er_spoke_z2WISDMnLHlrnQdMsY2hwN#ixzz1fWTlfBWQ
 
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/sports/penn_state/lawyer:-sandusky-won't-take-plea-deal-120111

Lawyer: Sandusky Won't Take Plea Deal
Amendola Says They May Have To Talk Plea Deal
Updated: Thursday, 01 Dec 2011, 11:08 AM EST
Published : Thursday, 01 Dec 2011, 10:54 AM EST

PHILADELPHIA - The attorney for Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State assistant accused of sex crimes, is now denying a published report his client would take a plea in the case.

Attorney Joe Amendola told FoxNews.com on Thursday that a report from a Harrisburg newspaper was inaccurate.

"No, that is not accurate,” Amendola told FoxNews.com when asked about his comments printed in the Harrisburg Patriot-News, where he reportedly said a plea deal “could happen if more allegations come forth and Jerry gets to the point where he realizes fighting against more than the original allegations might be a real uphill battle."

Sandusky will be in court on December 13th in Bellefonte, Pa., in what will be a media circus.

At least two of the alleged victims in the Sandusky case could testify in the case, unless the defense waives the hearing.

Two Penn State officials facing perjury charges are in court the week after Sandusky.

Amendola is the same lawyer who let his client do a television interview with NBC last month.

Amendola first claimed that Sandusky, the former Penn State football assistant coach charged with molesting eight boys, is completely innocent and falsely accused.

Amendola's new remarks were allegedly made on the same day that the first in what might be many civil lawsuits was filed against Sandusky.

The alleged victim, known only as "John Doe A," says Sandusky abused him more than 100 times in a Penn State locker room, while on trips to Philadelphia, and at Sandusky's home.

This accuser is not one of the eight victims named in the grand jury report. But his lawyer says his client is no different from any of the other victims.
 
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/local_news/school:-sandusky-denied-job-after-background-check

School: Sandusky Denied Job After Background Check
Updated: Wednesday, 07 Dec 2011, 9:24 AM EST
Published : Wednesday, 07 Dec 2011, 9:23 AM EST

A central Pennsylvania college says former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky was denied a volunteer coaching position last year because a background check revealed a high school was investigating him on sex abuse allegations later detailed by a grand jury.

That's all I was allowed to post without getting an error message.
 
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...p-sandusky-basement-grand-jury-135190643.html

Victim 9 Screamed for Help From Sandusky's Basement: Court Documents
This is the verbatim account of Victim 9 from the Grand Jury presentment.
Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 | Updated 3:30 PM

This is the verbatim account of Victim 9 from the Grand Jury presentment used to bring new charges against former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Victim No. 9 is currently an 18 year old male who met Sandusky through his childhood participation in The Second Mile Program. Victim No. 9 began participating in activities through The Second Mile Program in approximately 2004. From 2004 to 2008, Victim 9 participated in a number of Second Mile camps and activities.

Victim 9 testified that during his second summer attending Second Mile camps, he met Sandusky while participating in a pool activity as part of the Second Mile camp. Sandusky approached him, asking him about his life and spoke with him about hobbies and activities that interested the child. After speaking for a while, Sandusky expressed an interest in spending time in the future with Victim 9. Sandusky asked for his phone number and eventually called Victim 9's mother and made arrangements to spend additional time with him. At the time of this initial contact, Victim 9 would have been 11 or 12 years old.

Subsequently, Sandusky took Victim 9 to numerous Penn State University football games. Over time, he also gave Victim 9 a number of gifts and even provided him with money. Eventually, Sandusky would also go directly to Victim 9's school and pick him up on Friday afternoons. Victim 9 would often spend overnights with Sandusky and be returned to his home, following these visits, by Sandusky.

Victim 9 testified that Sandusky was a very affectionate person. The victim testified "I took it at first he was just a nice guy, like he went to church every weekend, his kids would come over every once in a while an stuff. And after a while, like, he got used to me and stuff and started getting further and further, wanting -- to touchy feely." He further stated that, in the beginning, Sandusky started out with hugging, rubbing, cuddling and tickling. These contacts, initially viewed by the victim as simple acts of affection, escalated into sexual assaults.

Victim 9 testified that, during his overnight visits with Sandusky, he always stayed in a bedroom located in the basement of the Sandusky home. He stated that there were a number of bedrooms located elsewhere in the home and that at least two of these were not occupied. Victim 9 was always, without excpetion, told to sleep in the basement bedroom. Victim 9 testified that Sandusky specifically told him to stay in the basement unless otherwise directed by Sandusky. He ate meals in the basement and the food would be brought to him by Sandusky. Victim 9 testified that he spend overnights in the Sandusky home on numerous occasions between the ages of 12 and 15. He further testified that despite being in the Sandusky home on these numerous occasions, he had "barely any" contact with Sandusky's wife during his visits. He specifically testified that she "never" came into the basement when he was there.

Victim 9 desribed a pattern of sexual assaults by Sandusky over a period of years. Many of these assaults occurred in the basement bedroom of Sandusky's residence. The victim testified that Sandusky forced him to perform oral sex on numerous occasions. Sandusky also attempted to engage in anal penetration of Victim 9 on at least sixteen occasions and at times did penetrate him. The victim testified that on at least one occasion he screamed for help, knowing that Sandusky's wife was upstairs, but no one ever came to help him.

Victim 9 also testified that Sandusky would take him to a hotel in the State College area. At this hotel Sandusky would utilize the swimming pool, Jacuzzi and work out equipment. These visits often occurred at times when the pool was not occupied. Victim 9 testified that on one of these visits, when only he and Sandusky were in the pool, Sandusky exposed his erect penis to the victim. He stated that at other times Sandusky had him touch his erect penis and perform oral sex on him during some of these visits to the hotel.

Sandusky frequently told him that he loved and cared for him. He also told the victim to keep these things a secret.

Victim 9 contacted the Pennsylvania State Police following the public disclosure of Sandusky's arrest pursuant to Presentment Number 12.
 
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...ture-Enabled-Jerry-Sandusky-AP-135428368.html

Penn State 'Culture' Enabled Sandusky: AP Impact
Secrecy played a part in Sandusky's alleged sex assaults
By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE, JEFF DONN and MICHAEL RUBINKAM
Monday, Dec 12, 2011 | Updated 8:29 AM

The warning signs were there for more than a decade, disturbing indicators that Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was breaching boundaries with young boys or maybe worse.

Note: error message wouldn't allow the full story to post.
 
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footba...grand-jury-he-8216-knew-ina?urn=ncaaf-wp11597

Testimony: Paterno ‘knew inappropriate action was taken by Jerry Sandusky with a youngster’ in 2002

buffettjpg.jpg

Joe Paterno

What did Joe Paterno know, and when did he know it?

Today, we have some answers to the crucial question from the coach's mouth after Paterno's testimony from earlier this year — in which the now-former Penn State icon told a grand jury that he had been informed about an incident of "a sexual nature" between ex-defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky and a young boy in 2002 — was read for the first time in open court Friday.

In the testimony, Paterno said he "knew inappropriate action was taken by Jerry Sandusky with a youngster" after a meeting with then-graduate assistant Mike McQueary, who allegedly saw Sandusky sexually abusing a boy in a locker room shower the previous night, but did not inform police and waited several days to meet with his boss, athletic director Tim Curley, because he "didn't want to interfere with their weekends."

Sandusky, who played and coached under Paterno for more than 30 years prior to his retirement in 1999, remained a regular on Penn State's campus until his arrest on a multitude of sexual abuse charges last month.

Paterno's testimony was read as part of a preliminary hearing for Curley and another Penn State administrator, Gary Schultz, who are both charged with perjury and failure to report for not turning Sandusky in following a meeting with McQueary in 2002. (Paterno wasn't present at the hearing, which came less than a week after the soon-to-be 85-year-old was reportedly hospitalized with a fractured pelvis after falling in his home. He's also been undergoing treatment for lung cancer.) A judge ruled at the end of the proceedings that the state has enough evidence to send the case against Curley and Shultz to trial.

McQueary — a State College native and former starting quarterback who remained on Paterno's staff until Paterno was fired as a result of the scandal last month — took the stand Friday morning, testifying that he personally saw Sandusky with his arms wrapped around a boy's waist in a shower, and believed (although he was not 100 percent certain) that the boy was being sodomized. He immediately called his father, and they decided he should go to Paterno the next day. In that meeting and the subsequent meeting with Curley and Schultz, McQueary said he was clear that he was describing an "extremely sexual" act (emphasis added):

buffettjpg.jpg

Mike McQueary

He said he did not give Paterno explicit details of what he believed he'd seen, saying he wouldn't have used terms like sodomy or anal intercourse out of respect for the longtime coach.

He said Paterno told him he'd "done the right thing" by reporting what he saw. The head coach appeared shocked and saddened and slumped back in his chair, McQueary said. Paterno told McQueary he would talk to others about what he'd reported.

Nine or 10 days later, McQueary said he met with Curley and Shultz and told them he'd seen Sandusky and a boy, both naked, in the shower after hearing skin on skin slapping sounds.

"I told them that I saw Jerry in the showers with a young boy and that what I had seen was extremely sexual and over the lines and it was wrong," McQueary said. "I would have described that it was extremely sexual and I thought that some kind of intercourse was going on."

That testimony is substantially the same as the one McQueary reportedly gave to the grand jury earlier this year. Friday, McQueary said he thought Curley and Schultz took his report seriously, and that he considered Schultz law enforcement because his position included oversight of campus police. "I thought I was talking to the head of the police, to be frank with you," McQueary said. "In my mind it was like speaking to a (district attorney). It was someone who police reported to and would know what to do with it."

What they did with it, according to the Pennsylvania attorney general, is essentially nothing: In its summary of the initial charges against Sandusky on Nov. 5, the AG's office wrote that "there is no indication that anyone from the university ever attempted to learn the identity of the child who was sexually assaulted on their campus or made any follow-up effort to obtain more information," and "there was no effective change in Sandusky's status with the school and no limits on his access to the campus."

In his testimony Friday afternoon, Curley disputed that conclusion, arguing that McQueary "did not indicate there was something of a sexual nature" between Sandusky and the boy during their meeting, and that he understood the incident as "horsing around." He responded by telling Sandusky he was banned from coming into the building with children from his charity, The Second Mile, but otherwise did not restrict access. (University president Graham Spanier signed off on the ban, according to the attorney general, "without any further inquiry.")

Curley didn't report the incident to the police, he testified Friday, because "I didn't think it was a crime at the time." In Curley's defense, attorney Roberto argued that McQueary failed to convey the seriousness of what he'd seen to Paterno, that the allegations subsequently came across as "not that serious" to Curley, and that it seemed to amount to a case of "he said, she said."

Schultz did not testify Friday, but in a grand jury testimony read at the hearing, he said he was under the impression (from his meeting with McQueary) that Sandusky and the boy were wrestling and Sandusky grabbed the boy's genitals in a "horsing around" type of way. This was consistent with Sandusky's general demeanor, Schultz said, because "he would grab you on the arm, hit you on the back, grab you and put you in a headlock."

Sandusky had been implicated as a possible sex offender as early as 1998, when university police were involved in an investigation following "allegations of sexually inappropriate behavior involving Sandusky and young boys in the football showers."

At least two detectives in that case reportedly heard Sandusky admit to showering with a boy on two different occasions, once to the boy's mother and once in an interview with the state's child welfare agency, but the case was closed after the county district attorney (now deceased) declined to prosecute. Schultz told the grand jury he was aware of the investigation that Penn State police had produced a 95-page report.

Sandusky retired from Paterno's staff a year later at the age of 55, but maintained an office in the Lasch Football Building and had "unlimited access to all football facilities," including the locker room. He also kept a parking pass, a university Internet account and a listing in the faculty directory.

In 2008, according to USA Today, Sandusky ended his involvement with the charitable program, The Second Mile, amid accusations by another adolescent male. As recently as 2009, he was still running an overnight football camp for children as young as 9 on Penn State's campus. He was still working out on campus as recently as October — after university officials had been called to testify in the investigation that ultimately led to Sandusky's arrest. Sandusky told the New York Times earlier this month that he still has his keys.

At that point, Sandusky faced more than 25 felony counts of deviate sexual intercourse, aggravated indecent assault, unlawful contact with a minor, endangering the welfare of a child and indecent assault against at least eight victims over more than a decade. He was subsequently re-arrested last week on 12 additional counts involving two additional victims.

Paterno, Curley, Schultz and Spanier have all "resigned" or been fired from their jobs in the wake of the charges. McQueary has been put on administrative leave and reportedly told players on a conference call last month, "I wanted to let you guys know I'm not your coach anymore. I'm done." Legally, prosecutors have determined that McQueary, Paterno and Spanier fulfilled their obligations under state law.

The Penn State Board of Trustees has appointed a special committee to investigate the university's response, as has the U.S. Department of Education and the NCAA. This is the system at work.
 
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...s-for-former-penn-state-ad-curley-vp-schultz/

2 Penn State Officials Held For Trial Following Sex Abuse Hearing
December 16, 2011 5:00 PM
By Tony Romeo and Oren Liebermann

HARRISBURG, Pa. (CBS/AP) - A Penn State assistant football coach testified Friday that he believes he saw former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky molesting a boy on campus and that he fully conveyed what he had seen to two Penn State administrators.

Mike McQueary, speaking for the first time in public about the 2002 encounter in a Penn State locker room, said he believes that Sandusky was attacking the child with his hands around the boy’s waist but said he wasn’t 100 percent sure it was intercourse.

McQueary took the stand Friday morning in a Pennsylvania courtroom during a preliminary hearing for university officials Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, who are accused of lying to a grand jury about what McQueary told them.

At the conclusion of the hearing, District Judge William C. Wenner ruled that prosecutors have enough evidence to send their cases to trial.

McQueary’s story is central to the case against Curley and Schultz. They testified to the grand jury that McQueary never relayed the seriousness of what he saw. The officials, and Penn State coach Joe Paterno, have been criticized for never telling police about the 2002 allegation. Prosecutors say Sandusky continued to abuse boys for six more years.

The lawyers for Curley and Schultz say the men are innocent and that uncorroborated testimony from McQueary is not enough on which to hang the case. Curley and Schultz told the grand jury that they remembered McQueary reporting only something inappropriate, like wrestling, but nothing as serious as rape.

McQueary, who was on the stand for about two hours Friday, said he had stopped by a campus football locker room to drop off a pair of sneakers in the spring of 2002 when he heard slapping sounds in a shower and happened upon Sandusky and the boy.

He said Sandusky was behind the boy he estimated to be 10 or 12 years old, with his hands wrapped around the youngster’s waist. He said the boy was facing a wall, with his hands on it.

McQueary, 37, said he has never described what he saw as anal rape or anal intercourse and couldn’t see Sandusky’s genitals, but that “it was very clear that it looked like there was intercourse going on.”

In its report last month, the grand jury summarized McQueary’s testimony as saying he “saw a naked boy … with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky.”

Under cross examination by an attorney for Curley, McQueary reiterated that he had not seen Sandusky penetrating or fondling the boy but was nearly certain they were having intercourse because the two were standing so close and Sandusky’s arms were wrapped around the youth.

He said he peeked into the shower three times — the first via a mirror, the other two times directly. The last time he looked in, Sandusky and the boy had separated, he said. He said he didn’t say anything, but “I know they saw me. They looked directly in my eye, both of them.”

McQueary said the entire encounter — from when he first entered the locker room to when he retreated to his office — lasted about 45 seconds.

McQueary said he reported what he saw to Paterno but never went to police.

He said he did not give Paterno explicit details of what he believed he’d seen, saying he wouldn’t have used terms like sodomy or anal intercourse out of respect for the longtime coach.

Paterno told the grand jury that McQueary reported seeing Sandusky doing something of a “sexual nature” with the youngster but that he didn’t press for details.

“I didn’t push Mike … because he was very upset,” Paterno said. “I knew Mike was upset, and I knew some kind of inappropriate action was being taken by Jerry Sandusky with a youngster.”

McQueary said Paterno told him he’d “done the right thing” by reporting the encounter. The head coach appeared shocked and saddened and slumped back in his chair, McQueary said.

Paterno told McQueary he would talk to others about what he’d reported.

Nine or 10 days later, McQueary said he met with Curley and Schultz and told them he’d seen Sandusky and a boy, both naked, in the shower after hearing skin-on-skin slapping sounds.

“I told them that I saw Jerry in the showers with a young boy and that what I had seen was extremely sexual and over the lines and it was wrong,” McQueary said. “I would have described that it was extremely sexual and I thought that some kind of intercourse was going on.”

McQueary said he was left with the impression both men took his report seriously. When asked why he didn’t go to police, he referenced Schultz’s position as a vice president at the university who had overseen the campus police

“I thought I was talking to the head of the police, to be frank with you,” he said. “In my mind it was like speaking to a (district attorney). It was someone who police reported to and would know what to do with it.”

Curley told the grand jury that he couldn’t recall his specific conversation with McQueary, but that McQueary never reported seeing anal intercourse or other sexual conduct. He said he recalled McQueary reporting wrestling or “horsing around.”

Schultz said he remembered McQueary and Paterno describing what the younger coach saw only in a very general way.

“I had the impression it was inappropriate,” Schultz told the grand jury. “I had the feeling it was some king of wrestling activity and maybe Jerry might have grabbed a young boys genitals.”

Under cross-examination, McQueary said he considered what he saw a crime but didn’t call police because “it was delicate in nature.”

“I tried to use my best judgment,” he said. “I was sure the act was over.” He said he never tried to find the boy.

Paterno, Schultz and Curley didn’t testify, but Judge Wenner read their grand jury testimony from January in weighing the case.

Curley’s attorney, Caroline Roberto, said prosecutors “will never be able to reach their burden proof at a trial.”

Schultz’s attorney, Tom Farrell, predicted his client would be acquitted.

He also took a shot at Paterno, saying, “I’m an Italian from Brooklyn, and he may not have called the police but he may have done what I would have done, which is get the boys in the car with a few baseball bats and crowbars and take it to the fellow.”

Sandusky says he is innocent of more than 50 charges stemming from what authorities say were sexual assaults over 12 years on 10 boys in his home, on Penn State property and elsewhere. The scandal has provoked strong criticism that Penn State officials didn’t do enough to stop Sandusky, and prompted the departures of Paterno and the school’s longtime president, Graham Spanier.

Curley, 57, Penn State’s athletic director, was placed on leave by the university after his arrest. Schultz, 62, returned to retirement after spending about four decades at the school, most recently as senior vice president for business and finance, and treasurer.
 
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news...im-Claims-Jerry-Sandusky-Abuse-136155388.html

12 Alleged Sandusky Victim Comes Forward
A 12th person has come forward with accusations that former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused him when he was 12-years-old
By Elyse Madison | Friday, Dec 23, 2011 | Updated 8:14 PM

A 12th person has come forward with accusations against former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky.

The new alleged victim says Sandusky sexually abused him when he was 12-years-old.

NBC News confirmed Friday that a civil lawsuit was filed Thursday against Sandusky, Penn State and The Second Mile Charity.

The accuser claims Sandusky gave him whiskey inside his office on Penn State's campus, before inappropriately touching. The alleged incident only happened once, but his lawyer told NBC News that his client “continues to suffer severe psychological damage" and is attempting to seek help for it.

Attorney Charles Schmidt says his client met Sandusky through The Second Mile Charity and would talk to Sandusky about his mother, who died a year before he was allegedly sexually assaulted.

The lawsuit — which was filed in Philadelphia County — is the second civil suit filed against Sandusky, Penn State and The Second Mile.

Schmidt says he expects papers to be served within the next few weeks.
 
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/sports/penn_state/foxnews:-new-penn-state-rape-claims-123111

FoxNews: New Penn State Rape Claims
Updated: Saturday, 31 Dec 2011, 8:55 AM EST
Published : Saturday, 31 Dec 2011, 8:43 AM EST

An attorney from a man who claims he was raped as a child by former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky details the charges in a FoxNews.com interview.

The teen’s lawyer, Charles Schmidt, told FoxNews.com that Sandusky lured his client into an office at Penn State seven years ago, gave him alcohol and raped him.

A teenager claims he was attacked by Sandusky at Penn State University’s football building in 2004 — two years after an alleged incident involving another child in the same building that is a key part of the state's case against Sandusky.

The now-19-year-old has initiated a civil suit against in Philadelphia against Sandusky, Second Mile and Penn State University.

The Attorney General’s office is investigating the allegations, FoxNews.com has learned, though a spokesman from the AG’s office declined to comment to it.

The statute of limitations for criminal charges in such cases is 12 years after the child's 18th birthday.

One of Sandusky’s lawyers, Karl Rominger, discredited the claims to FoxNews.com.

“The reality is it didn’t happen. If you listen carefully, [the allegation] doesn’t make sense. In the history of sex crimes, you see grooming behavior—you don’t pick a kid out of crowd and assault him one time all of a sudden. On its face it doesn’t even sound plausible :rolleyes:,” he told the Web site.

Sandusky is due back in court in January 2012 for the next procedural hearing in his criminal case.

There are now several civil lawsuits filed against Sandusky and experts expect more as the criminal case heads to trial sometime in the next year.
 
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpps/new...y-pedophile-in-98-dpgapx-km-20120324_18796793

Report: Sandusky Called 'Likely Pedophile' In '98
Updated: Saturday, 24 Mar 2012, 4:54 PM EDT
Published : Saturday, 24 Mar 2012, 4:54 PM EDT

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP) - A psychologist who looked into a 1998 allegation against former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky told police at the time that his behavior fit the profile of a likely pedophile, NBC News reported Saturday.

Yet Sandusky was not criminally charged, nor placed on a state registry of suspected child abusers, and prosecutors say he continued assaulting boys for more than a decade until his arrest in November.

NBC obtained a copy of the campus police department's investigatory report on an encounter in which Sandusky was accused of having inappropriate contact with an 11-year-old boy with whom he had showered naked on the Penn State campus.

The police file includes the report of State College psychologist Alycia Chambers, who interviewed and provided counseling to the boy.

"My consultants agree that the incidents meet all of our definitions, based on experience and education, of a likely pedophile's pattern of building trust and gradual introduction of physical touch, within a context of a 'loving,' 'special' relationship," Chambers wrote.

However, a second psychologist, John Seasock, concluded that Sandusky had neither assaulted the boy nor fit the profile of a pedophile.

Chambers and Seasock did not immediately return phone messages left at their offices Saturday.

Centre County prosecutors ultimately decided not to charge Sandusky, and the case was closed until a statewide grand jury accused the retired defensive coordinator of abusing the boy and nine others over a 15-year period. Sandusky, who faces more than 50 counts of child sex abuse, has pleaded innocent and awaits trial.

Chambers' warning to authorities raises new questions about the university's failure to stop Sandusky. Eight of the 10 boys were attacked on campus, prosecutors allege.

In 2002, four years after the 1998 investigation, prosecutors say then-graduate assistant Mike McQueary caught Sandusky sexually assaulting a boy in the football showers. McQueary reported what he saw to coach Joe Paterno, who, in turn, reported the allegation to university officials. But no police investigation was ever done.

Penn State said in a statement Saturday that it would not comment, citing ongoing investigations.

Sandusky's attorney, Joseph Amendola, told The Associated Press on Saturday that Seasock's report was "exculpable" and that the 1998 incident was not as clear-cut as Chambers made it out to be.

"We could get five psychologists, child psychologists, who specialize maybe in sexual dysfunctions or pedophilia look at the same case and talk to the same people and come up with five different conclusions," he said in a phone interview.

The 1998 allegation was the first known complaint made to authorities about Sandusky. A woman called the Penn State police department, saying she was troubled after her 11-year-old son told her he had showered naked with Sandusky on campus.

Prosecutors say Sandusky lathered up the boy — known as Victim 6 in the state's current criminal case — bear-hugged him naked from behind, and picked him up and put his head under the shower. Detectives say that later, with police secretly listening in, Sandusky told the boy's mother the joint shower had been a mistake, and blurted: "I wish I were dead."

The woman's complaint triggered a separate review by state Department of Public Welfare, which found no indication of abuse by Sandusky.

But state welfare department investigator Jerry Lauro told AP in December that he didn't have access to the criminal investigative file. On Wednesday, he told The Patriot-News of Harrisburg that he never would have closed the case had he seen the reports from Chambers and the second psychologist, Seasock.

"The course of history could have been changed," Lauro told the newspaper, which first reported the existence of the twin psychological reports.

"The conclusions (Chambers) had drawn in her report were pretty damaging," Lauro told the paper. "I would have made a different decision. ... It's unbelievable, and it gets my blood pressure going when I think about it."

Seasock, who worked with Centre County Office of Children and Youth Services, interviewed the boy for an hour and wrote in his report — also included in the police file obtained by NBC — that he did not find any evidence of "grooming" or "inappropriate sexual behavior" by Sandusky.

"All the interactions reported by (the boy) can be typically defined as normal between a health adult and a young adolescent male," Seasock wrote.

Seasock, however, did not review Chambers' report or prior interviews with the boy before submitting his own report, the police report indicates, nor did he elicit key details, including the fact that Sandusky had kissed the boy and told him he loved him.

Amendola said that Chambers has refused to talk to the defense, but that he would try anew in light of the NBC report.
 
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Sandusky-Docs-Suggest-17-Accusers-150291605.html

Sandusky Docs Suggest 17 Accusers
Criminal charges only pertain to 10 victims
Saturday, May 5, 2012 | Updated 4:25 PM

New documents filed by the attorneys for former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky suggest there are at least 17 accusers in the child sexual abuse case, a much higher number than described in criminal charges.

The requests, dated April 16 and April 23, were attached to a motion filed Thursday in which Sandusky defense attorney Joe Amendola asked the supervising judge to mandate more disclosure of investigative materials.

The criminal charges against the former Penn State assistant football coach only pertain to boys named as Victims 1 through 10 in court records.

The April 16 discovery request asked for information on "uncharged conduct evidence," while the one filed a week later pertained to employment records.

The court filing did not name the people, explain what might make them accusers or indicate what role, if any, they play in the criminal case in which Sandusky has denied all allegations.

"This in all likelihood means that there are other people who have come forward who have accused him of improper sexual conduct," said Wes Oliver, a Widener Law School professor who specializes in criminal law.

Asked about the eight supposed accusers, Sandusky defense lawyer Karl Rominger indicated the basis for the requests grew from previous material disclosed to the defense by the attorney general's office.

The April 23 request referred to "all individuals identified as Accusers 11 through 17 as well as 18 through an unknown number."

"The requests we made are based on what we believe should be provided, based on information we've received to date," Rominger said.

A spokesman for the attorney general's office declined to comment, citing a gag order issued by the presiding judge.

Lawyers for potential civil litigants have said there are accusers beyond the 10 alleged victims for which Sandusky, 68, faces 52 criminal charges. One alleged victim has filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia that is on hold while the criminal case proceeds.

There are many possible reasons why prosecutors might not file charges based on the claims of a purported victim, from problems with the statute of limitations and questions about credibility to a strategic analysis about how much evidence to put before jurors.

Information about any additional accusers for which Sandusky has not been charged could help the defense try to undermine the credibility of the prosecution's case, said University of Pittsburgh law professor John Burkoff, an expert on Pennsylvania criminal law procedure.

"There may not be anything there, but who knows?" Burkoff said. "It's all a part of getting as much evidence as you can, to see what you've got."

Oliver said there are theoretical scenarios under which the additional names could be either helpful or damaging to Sandusky's defense.

"If the other eight people are kooks, that's actually a great story for the defense to put before the jury," Oliver said. "If, however, there are eight other alleged victims out there who the prosecution just can't corroborate but they've got pretty good stories, then that's really bad for the defense."

Another discovery request, dated March 27, sought nine documents that Amendola said were removed from football coach Joe Paterno's office and copied by state police. Amendola wrote that the documents had undergone a "supervised review" and been protected by a "police seal of evidence."

It was not clear what the documents were, or when the state police may have taken them.

Paterno was fired in November, following Sandusky's arrest, and he died of lung cancer in January. Paterno was not charged with any crime but expressed regret about how he handled a complaint from an underling about Sandusky in a football team shower with a boy a decade ago.

Paterno family spokesman Dan McGinn said he had no information about the documents and referred questions to Penn State, which declined comment.

"Coach Paterno delivered all relevant materials under his control," McGinn said. "The Paternos were not part of any 'supervised review.'"

It is normal for prosecutors and defense attorneys to argue about disclosure of investigative materials prior to trial, which in Sandusky's case is scheduled to begin in one month.

On Thursday, Judge John Cleland directed state prosecutors to turn over materials that are not in dispute before a pretrial hearing on Wednesday in Bellefonte, and to say in writing by Monday if there are remaining discovery disputes.

Additionally, ex-FBI director Louis Freeh and his team have conducted more than 400 interviews in the internal investigation spurred by the charges against Sandusky, Penn State trustee Kenneth Frazier said Friday.

Frazier said the investigation includes current and former employees from numerous departments across the university, which employs more than 18,000 at its main campus in State College.

The school still hopes the investigation will be completed by the time the next academic year begins in late August. The board still intends to make the full findings and recommendations public, Frazier said.

But, he added the time of the report timing "will be dictated by how long it takes to complete a thorough investigation."

School officials said nearly all of the trustees have now been interviewed.

And in Harrisburg, two Penn State administrators charged with lying to the grand jury investigating Jerry Sandusky filed court documents Friday that argued prosecutors have not produced enough evidence to support the perjury charges against them.

Athletic director Tim Curley, now on leave, and retired vice president for business Gary Schultz outlined the reasons they believe charges should be thrown out. Curley's filing cited what he called "a shifting sand approach" by prosecutors and said the court record so far did not include the basic elements needed for a perjury case to proceed.

Schultz's reply called the case "unprovable, unfounded and untimely" and said prosecutors acted prematurely with an exaggerated grand jury presentment to tarnish them with the child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky. The attorney general's office declined to comment.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKX9J2ENXTs

Prosecutors Change Timeline Of Alleged Shower-Room Rape In Jerry Sandusky Trial
May 8, 2012 8:02 AM
By Tony Romeo

HARRISBURG, Pa. (CBS) — Prosecutors in the Jerry Sandusky case have changed the timeline of a critical allegation in the case against the former assistant football coach and two former Penn State administrators.

Up until now, the attorney general’s office has contended that the alleged locker room shower assault that then graduate assistant Mike McQueary claims he witnessed occurred in March 2002.

That alleged incident has not only resulted in charges against Sandusky, but also led to perjury charges against two former Penn State administrators and led to the firing of the late head coach Joe Paterno.

Now, in a motion to amend an earlier filing, prosecutors say their ongoing investigation has determined that the incident witnessed by McQueary occurred more than a year earlier than thought, in February of 2001, not March 2002.

Prosecutors on Monday also filed their response to the defense motion seeking more information from the Commonwealth.

The lawyers for the two former Penn State administrators facing trial in this case released a statement Monday evening saying the latest development shows the Commonwealth charged this case before it knew the facts.
 
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...eek-to-have-identities-concealed-from-public/

4 Of Sandusky’s Alleged Victims Seek To Have Identities Concealed From Public
May 29, 2012 5:40 PM

BELLEFONTE, Pa. (AP) — Four of the young men alleged to be child sexual abuse victims of Jerry Sandusky are asking the judge in his case to prevent their real names from being made public.

Lawyers for so-called victims 3, 5 and 7 filed motions Tuesday asking Judge John Cleland to prevent identities of alleged victims from being disclosed publicly.

Lawyers for Victim 4 are asking for a pseudonym to be used for him during the upcoming trial.

The lawyers for Victims 3 and 7 say Sandusky’s lawyer isn’t opposed, but they haven’t heard back from state prosecutors.

Victim 4′s lawyers say his psychologist is worried about what effect disclosure of his name will have on his well-being.

The 68-year-old former Penn State assistant coach’s trial starts next week. He denies the allegations.
 
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...es-in-jerry-sandusky-child-sexual-abuse-case/

12-Person Jury, Alternate Chosen In Jerry Sandusky Child Sexual Abuse Case
June 6, 2012 1:24 PM

BELLEFONTE, Pa. (AP) — A jury was selected Wednesday in the child molestation scandal that brought down Joe Paterno, and the makeup of the panel left no doubt this is Penn State country.

The seven women and five men who will hear opening statements on Monday in the case against former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky include an engineering administrative assistant at Penn State, a dance teacher in the school’s continuing education program and a professor who has been on the faculty for 24 years.

They also include a Penn State senior, a retired soil sciences professor with 37 years at the university, a man with bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the school and a woman who’s been a football season ticket holder since the 1970s.

One of four alternate jurors was selected Wednesday, a woman in her 30s who graduated from Penn State in 2007 with a degree in human development. Three more alternates remain to be picked, and a prosecutor said he thought those selections could be finished Wednesday afternoon.

The selection process moved swiftly even though the rural area is rich with Penn State employees, alumni and fans. The judge, however, said Penn State connections would not automatically disqualify potential jurors, so long as they could pledge to be impartial.

Sandusky faces a total of 52 counts involving 10 alleged victims over a 15-year span. He has denied the allegations, and defense lawyer Joseph Amendola’s potential witness list has seven Sandusky family members on it, including his wife, Dottie, and two sons.

Amendola on Wednesday asked again for a delay, alleging that an ABC News report saying that the accuser identified in court papers as Victim 4 would be the first witness violated the gag order Judge John Cleland issued in April. Cleland denied Amendola’s request.

The lawyers who will argue the case said on the way into the courthouse Wednesday they were happy with the process so far.

During a midday break, lead prosecutor Joseph McGettigan, a senior deputy attorney general, said “So far, so good,” on way to smoking a cigarette at a picnic table outside the courthouse.

Amendola arrived with Sandusky just after 8:15 a.m. and told reporters he was confident the nine jurors picked on Tuesday would give them a “fair shake.” Sandusky himself did not say anything as he entered the building in Bellefonte, about 12 miles from the university where he once worked.

But he displayed the most emotion yet during the two-day selection process during a break Wednesday. Sandusky turned to two media representatives in the room and asked rhetorically, “What did you guys do to deserve me?” He chuckled before adding, “How did you guys get stuck with this?”

Besides the panelists with ties to Penn State, jurors include a 24-year-old man with plans to attend auto technician school, a mother of two who works in retail, a retired school bus driver, an engineer with no Penn State ties and a property management firm employee.

But the breadth of Penn State connections was evident again in the second day of jury selection, an exhaustive process done in phases. Groups of 40 were questioned at a time, and those who weren’t excused from that portion were then questioned individually to finally determine if they can be seated.

Of the 40 initially questioned Wednesday, 10 indicated they worked at Penn State. Nineteen indicated either they or a close family member had volunteered or financially contributed to the university.

Fifteen said they knew someone on the prosecution’s witness list, while 20 knew someone on Sandusky’s defense list. Eighteen indicated they had jobs or other responsibilities in which they were legally required to report instances of alleged child abuse.

Sandusky was quiet in court during this phase early Wednesday, leafing through a binder with plastic-covered pages and pausing at times when Cleland commented from the bench.

More than 600 jury duty summonses were sent out to residents in Centre County, the home of Penn State University’s main campus.

Sandusky’s lawyer won the right to have jurors chosen from the local community, and prosecutors had concerns that Centre County might prove to be nearly synonymous with Penn State.

All the jurors will have to say under oath they can be impartial.

Besides Sandusky family members, other names on the defense’s potential witness list include the widow and son of Joe Paterno, the late Hall of Fame football coach who was dismissed by university trustees in the aftermath of Sandusky’s arrest.

Assistant coach Mike McQueary and his father are also on the defense witness list.

Mike McQueary, on leave from the team, has said he saw Sandusky naked in a team shower with a young boy more than a decade ago and reported it to Paterno. Mike McQueary is also on the prosecution’s list, along with young men who have accused Sandusky of abusing them.
 
Back
Top