Yet ANOTHER globalist-satanist (big-Pharma)-creepy Joe-Chicom conspiracy un-covered, suckers--now u see why/how satanists fight for creepy Joe

[Apollonian]

WATCH: Covid Smoking Gun Discovered! Gain of Function Deception Revealed In Their Own Words​

The American Journal | Infowars.com
December 19th 2023, 3:31 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/watc...nction-deception-revealed-in-their-own-words/

Watch & share this bombshell analysis!

New report details how US scientists linked to Biden investments misled Pentagon on research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Harrison Smith of The American Journal breaks down a bombshell report on how American scientists misled the Pentagon on research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Infowars’ Chase Geiser explains this alarming development below:

Report Ties Biden’s Investment to Wuhan Lab Leak Cover-Up

US scientists linked to Biden investments misled Pentagon on research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology

• EcoHealth Alliance, under Peter Daszak, allegedly concealed the true nature of their risky coronavirus research in Wuhan, potentially downplaying risks to DARPA.
• The Wuhan lab leak theory relates to gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, possibly connected to the COVID-19 pandemic, with involvement from EcoHealth and Metabiota.
• Hunter Biden’s firm, Rosemont Seneca, invested in Metabiota, linking financial interests to the controversial Wuhan lab research.
• The partnership of EcoHealth and Metabiota in the PREDICT project raises questions about their roles in viral surveillance and the origins of COVID-19.

The Wuhan Lab Deception That Made The Biden Crime Family Millions

EcoHealth Alliance, under the direction of Peter Daszak, concealed the real intentions behind high-risk coronavirus research in Wuhan, as per documents that have recently surfaced.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/catal...=banner&utm_content=VasobeetBlackFridaybanned
2018’s Project DEFUSE emerges as the centerpiece of this drama. It’s not just any research proposal – it’s a story of engineering viruses, eerily akin to the notorious SARS-CoV-2. This isn’t science fiction; it’s the cold, hard potential reality behind COVID-19’s origins, a plot twist that could rival any spy thriller.

But the plot thickens: The DEFUSE grant proposal plays a cunning game of misdirection, masking the extent of Wuhan’s involvement. The aim? To make DARPA comfortable while planning to shift significant portions of this risky endeavor to Wuhan, under less stringent safety measures. Cost-saving or safety-compromising? Apparently, both.

Enter the duo of Peter Daszak and Ralph S. Baric, the scientists who may have been behind the gain-of-function research at The Wuhan Institute of Virology, set to the backdrop of BSL-2 standards, far from the recommended safety for such high-stakes work.


What we have here isn’t just a scientific oversight; it’s a narrative of calculated risks and hidden truths. This saga goes beyond mere viral research; it touches the very essence of global health security and the ethics of scientific exploration. As this story unravels, the world watches, waits, and wonders: Does anything else lie beneath the surface of the Wuhan lab saga? As a matter of fact, it gets much worse.

Wuhan Gain-of-Function Research and the Biden Connection

The plot thickens with the Bidens’ financial ties. Hunter Biden’s investment firm, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, poured half a million into Metabiota, a key player connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This isn’t a distant financial footnote; it’s a direct line to one of the most significant global health crises of our time.

The connections are too significant to ignore. The Bidens, gain-of-function research, and the potential lab leak – these aren’t just pieces of a puzzle; they’re chapters of a story that might hold the key to understanding the origins of a pandemic that brought the world to its knees.

EcoHealth Alliance and Metabiota happen to have been partners in the USAID’s PREDICT project. This wasn’t just a collaboration; it was a fusion of interests and objectives in the realm of viral surveillance, where every move matters.

But here’s where the intrigue lies – EcoHealth’s ties with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Metabiota’s consequential involvement. What was initially a surveillance venture now appears as a potential gateway to understanding the COVID-19 pandemic’s murky origins.

Hunter Biden’s financial dealings with Metabiota, a pathogen research company, raise questions that demand answers. With Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, co-founded by Hunter, funneling $500,000 into Metabiota, the plot thickens as the company secures a DoD contract to build a bioterrorism surveillance lab in Ukraine– a contract to the tune of $24 million. This all transpires under the watch of then-Vice President Joe Biden.

What’s more alarming is Metabiota’s collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s research on infectious diseases in bats that was being conducted. See what we’re getting at here?

Is it a mere coincidence that the Biden family’s financial ties intersect with a lab central to COVID-19 speculations? Please.

It seems like every time we peel back a layer of the Biden Crime Family’s legacy of corruption, another layer of crime surfaces, more complex and controversial than the last. From EcoHealth’s covert operations in Wuhan to Hunter Biden’s not-so-distant financial dance with Metabiota, and the shadowy intertwining of these entities with the origins of a global health crisis, the story reads like a cautionary tale of how a political class will risk anything and anyone for the sake of its own interests.

One thing is clear: The world deserves the truth, however inconvenient it might be. And as for the Bidens? Well, let’s just say that in the court of public opinion, even an approval rating of 37% appears far more than is deserved.

 

[Apollonian]

Experts Warn – WEF’s Net Zero Goals Will Kill 4+ Billion People.​

BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON DECEMBER 23, 2023

Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/12/23/experts-warn-wefs-net-zero-goals-will-kill-4-billion-people/

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its fellow unelected globalist leaders are pushing for governments around the world to phase out fossil fuels. Leading experts have spoken out against their plans and are warning the public that the WEF’s “Net Zero” goal to eliminate fossil fuels will result in the deaths of over four billion people or more.
The “Net Zero” target to end fossil fuel use is part of the WEF and UN’s “Agenda 2030” and “Agenda 2050” plans for humanity and involves dramatically reducing fossil reliance by 2030 and completely eliminating their use by 2050.
The WEF continues to push its agenda and has been calling for taxpayers worldwide to pay $3.5 trillion per year, which they insist is necessary to fund the noble global power in order to meet the globalist organisation’s “Net Zero” goal of “decarbonizing” the planet.
However, critics argue that “decarbonization” is just a euphemism for the WEF’s anti-human agenda and experts are raising the alarm about what this will actually mean for civilization, which includes the death of over four billion people.

Starvation​

Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg is just one who has warned that ending fossil fuel use will lead to the deaths of around half of the world’s population through starvation alone.
“4 billion people are dependent on fossil fertilizer for food,” Lomborg notes. “Without, 4 billion will starve to death. “It is time to call out the astoundingly destructive & misanthropic campaigners,” he declared.

The article Lomborg was responding to was by British economist Neil Record in the Telegraph, who argued that the number of people that might die was closer to six billion.

Six Billion Would Die in a Year.​

Neil Record reported: “If we literally just stopped using fossil fuels and “did without the natural resources on which the world, its economies and populations depend, most likely six billion people would die within a year.”
Breaking down what would happen in a world without fossil fuels, Record notes that most people would suffer blackouts due to the grid being so seriously compromised, possibly fatally, and they may be widespread and permanent.”
From day one, gas users would be the first to feel the change of no more mining of coal; the world’s oil wells shut down; the world’s gas fields likewise, and in 10 or 15 days, the UK would have to turn off its gas distribution system as it would be unable to maintain pressure.
In turn, the domestic supply would be shut down too – gas would stop flowing, and some 21 million households (74% of the population) would no longer have heating, hot water, and cooking facilities.
“In their panic, people might turn to electricity for their cooking and heating, but wait…” says Record, who adds, “The UK electricity grid relies on natural gas as its “buffer” energy source. Every day, demand varies according to consumer demand, and the other main energy supplier, renewables, are highly variable and can only power the grid when gas is picking up the lion’s share of the gap between their output and consumer demand.”Source

So the moment that the main gas distribution system is de-pressurised, the grid-balancing system fails and power cuts ensue.
Electricity demand would have rocketed through the switch to electric space heating, cooking and water-heating, and so it seems very likely that the sudden excess demand would be undeliverable, and therefore that the grid would spiral into uncontrollability resulting in no electricity. This also means there would be no communication systems no mobile phones and no television.
Without power, there will be no running water and no heating and the most vulnerable people will start to die, according to Record. Initially, this will be the elderly in their own homes, then in hospitals when the diesel backup generators run out of fuel. Within the first 25 days new “existential problems emerge for ordinary people in the form of food availability and distribution.” Source

Starvation Begins From Day 25 ​

Day 25 – By the twenty-fifth day, diesel and petrol are likely to have run dry, although, Record says that he is probably being generous with the timing here, but what this will mean is that food distribution would fail, and so as most of the population are entirely dependent on bought food they will begin to starve.
Interestingly, it will be only the isolated rural communities, and those who are agriculturally self-sufficient would be relatively unaffected.
Day 50 – Many people in urban areas would now be near death from starvation, Record claims, and “law and order would have broken down” and due to the “increasingly desperate search for the means of survival” he suspects there will have been “mass conflict and slaughter taking place.
Without the sanitary conditions that we have due to power, water supply, and sewage flow, we will see a return of Victorian diseases such as cholera and dysentery.
Day 100 – money and status will be irrelevant as time passes and just three months after the world stops oil, Neil Record, guesses that around half of the world’s population of approximately four billion, people would be dead “The first to die would be the urban poor; then the middle and upper classes”
Again, the survivors would be those in rural areas and able to live off local agricultural produce or live off dwindling food stocks.
For fifty-five percent of people in urban areas, it will be almost impossible to access food and safe water as there will be none of the normal distribution routes for food or storage facilities (chillers/freezers) without electricity, and without pumped water, clean water would be unavailable, or close to impossible to access. Source

A Year Without Oil – Murder and Mayhem.​

Day 365 – after a year without oil Record says “perhaps a further two billion people would have starved or frozen to death, leaving, say, two billion left alive remaining food stocks would have been exhausted or spoiled, and the inevitable breakdown of law and order would have meant many would meet a violent end.”
“Competition for scarce resources, so elegantly solved by the invention of markets and prices, would be replaced by murder and mayhem”
There is now no going back as the means to reverse the just stop oil experiment would have gone.
“The mass extinction would have robbed societies of their cultures, education, and survival techniques. A new dark age would ensue” and as Record says this is a nightmarish scenario, but claims that everything in this scenario is well supported by fact. Source

Meadows Depopulation​

Members of the WEF have repeatedly suggested that mass reductions in the number of humans on earth would help the organisation reach its green agenda goals, and as Slay News has reported, Dennis Meadows who is a “celebrated member of the WEF, has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans.
Meadows who is one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.” and an honorary member of the Club of Rome as well as a member of the World Economic Forum. argues that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

Meadow’s book was published over 50 years ago, but his ideology appears to still align with the WEF’s anti-human, depopulation agenda, of today. He argued that “most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”
“The survivors” are a select few, however, and it is unlikely that many of us will be included. (It’s that big club again). Source

One Way or Another​

Experts who have warned of the dangers associated with stopping oil should not be ignored, it is blatantly obvious that our unelected leaders are not interested in our well-being. Those who have been promised a privileged position in the depopulated world of the future, have many ways they hope to achieve their aims, whether it be through, chemtrails, vaccines, pharma products, toxic substances in food, water, etc etc, they aim to get us, one way or another and stopping oil is just one more way.

 

[Apollonian]

Introduction​

Link: https://www.ukcolumn.org/series/uk-situation-room-pfizermoderna-document-analysis/

by Cheryl Grainger

Never before has so much harm been done to so many, by so few, based on so little questionable, potentially flawed data.
Bob Seely MP

Obtaining the Data​

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is an organisation in the US, made up of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists. PHMPT exists for the sole purpose of disseminating to the public the data and information in the biological product files for each of the Covid–19 vaccines. In furtherance of its mission, and to ensure that the FDA, the US regulator of medicines, acts in furtherance of its commitment to transparency, PHMPT sought to obtain the data and information relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Covid vaccine via a Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) request.
On 9 September 2021, the FDA denied PHMPT’s request for expedited processing, on the basis that PHMPT did “not demonstrate a compelling need that involves an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual” or “that there exists an urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity.”
The FoIA request was eventually granted by court order through the PHMPT's attorney, Aaron Siri. The judge in the matter required the FDA to release all 451,000 pages of information over eight months, despite the FDA planning to retain the data for 75 years.
The judge in the FDA Pfizer Court Order trial cited the following quotations:

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance.
James Madison

A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of the people.
John F. Kennedy

Excessive administrative secrecy [...] feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the public's confidence in the government.
John McCain

Analysing the Data​

Dr Naomi Wolf, CEO of DailyClout.io, a website devoted to civic transparency, explains how the data was analysed:

We realised the raw documents were impossible to cover in normal journalistic ways, due to their massive scope and the documents are written for scientists and medical researchers.
We sent a call for expert volunteers ... we received 2000, then 2500, and finally 3500* responses from volunteers, many of whom are experts in their fields. Biostatisticians, lab clinicians, pathologists, anaesthesiologists, sports medicine physicians, cardiologists, research scientists, RNs, and many other related disciplines are represented among these decent, highly-skilled people who offered to read through these difficult, technical documents - pro bono, as a service to humanity (and out of respect as well, in many cases, for their own lifelong commitment to real science, real medicine, and truth in general). Many of them were not only published, peer-reviewed academic authors in their fields, but some were peer reviewers themselves. There was no way, with a group this distinguished in science and medicine doing the labour, that the interpretation of these documents could be dismissed as 'fringe', subjective, or as the work of 'conspiracy theorists'.
Of course, managing a project in which 3,500* highly trained specialists from all over the world work together virtually on unpacking and reporting on such a massive trove of material, would have been impossible for mere mortals. At first, indeed, we did not know how to organise the thousands of specialists who offered their help. Enter Amy Kelly, who is also a heroine of this story. She is a talented project manager, and now Daily Clout's COO; and she has a distinguished background in complex organisational projects in various fields.
Ms. Kelly managed, seemingly effortlessly, to organise the volunteers into six working teams, with subcommittees of expert readers. Under her extraordinary leadership, the thousands of specialists around the globe started to communicate with one another, share their findings, and draft their reports. I trained the volunteers in writing for a general audience, and the DailyClout editors in editing what was often dense medical language, but with extremely important findings, into accessible reports that anyone with any level of education could follow and understand.
For all of us, but mostly for the volunteers and Ms. Kelly, (this) represented a Herculean effort to turn this material, that one of the most powerful companies in the world trusted would never be made public, into ... readable reports sharing the most urgent headlines of all -- the reports that are now in your hands.

* 3,500 volunteered and 3,250 worked and continue to work on the project.

What Pfizer knew:​

• The mRNA vaccines did not work.
• The ingredients, including lipid nanoparticles, in the mRNA injections bio-distributed throughout the body in a couple of days, accumulating in the liver, adrenals, spleen and ovaries.
• Pfizer and the FDA knew that the injections damaged the hearts of minors—and yet waited months to inform the public.
• Pfizer sought to hire over a thousand new staffers simply to manage the flood of "adverse events" reports that they were receiving and that the company anticipated receiving. 61 people in the trials died of strokes, and half of the stroke adverse events were within a couple of days after injection.
• Five people in the trials died of liver damage—with, again, many of the liver damage adverse events sustained shortly after the injection.
• Neurological events, cardiac events, strokes, brain haemorrhages, blood clots, lung clots and leg clots were occurring at massive scale.
• Headaches, joint pain, and muscle pain were rampant as adverse events, though these are not disclosed as routine side effect warnings by our agencies.

Dr Wolf continues:

[...[ most seriously of all, you will see a 360-degree attack on human reproductive capability: with harms to sperm count, testes, sperm motility; harms to ovaries, menstrual cycles, placentas; you will see that over 80 per cent of the pregnancies in one section of the Pfizer documents ended in spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. You will see that 72 per cent of the adverse events in one section of the documents were in women, and that 16 percent of those were "reproductive disorders,'' in Pfizer's own words. You will see a dozen or more names for the ruination of the menstrual cycles of women and teenage girls. You will see that Pfizer defined "exposure" to the mRNA vaccine as including skin contact, inhalation, and sexual contact, especially at the point of conception.
History has not yet concluded its assessment of what Pfizer—and the FDA, who were in custody of all these documents—has done. We are at the very start of that assessment. But it is clear the following documents, written by impeccably skilled experts, and linked to primary sources, show that a crime has likely been committed against humanity that is unprecedented in its scale. Evidence of fraud would, if found, negate any indemnity for Pfizer.
Our thanks must go out to all the volunteers, the Daily Clout and especially Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly, Steve Bannon's War Room for actively discussing the analysis reports.

This is the schedule for the FDA document release:​

• Pfizer must produce 451,000 pages at a rate of 55,000 pages a month (as opposed to the 75 years that the FDA wanted to take). This will be complete by December 2023.
• Moderna data (plus Pfizer vaccine data for twelve- to fifteen-year-olds) is much larger, at 4.8 million pages, and will be released from the FDA at 180,000 pages a month—which will take about 26 months to mid-2025 (as opposed to the 23½ years that the FDA wanted to take).

This data has been released by the FDA, but its British counterpart, the MHRA, and all regulators globally would have had the same Common Technical Documents (CTD) sent to them in application for licensing Covid–19 vaccines. The MHRA would have had access to the same data that is analysed and described in these reports.
The MHRA was the first regulator to approve the Pfizer Covid–19 vaccine, on 1 December 2020, and thus allowed the UK to be the first country to vaccinate for Covid. The MHRA was analysing the Pfizer data at the same time as the data for the AstraZeneca Covid–19 vaccine, which it authorised on 30 December 2022. The Moderna offering, CTD, arrived during this time, when the MHRA had a 25% decline in its workforce.

The level of risk​

Age	Infection Fatality Rate (IFR), UK Source: Health Security Agency
0–19	0.0027%
20–29	0.014%
30–39	0.031%
40–49	0.082%
50–59	0.275%
60–69	0.59%
70+ (non-institutional)	2.4%
70+ (all)	5.5%

These risks should be weighed against (if there are any) the benefits.
In the UK, it appears that 86% of the funding of the MHRA is provided by the pharmaceutical industry, by the very companies whose products the MHRA regulates with the ostensible aim of protecting the public from harm. Indeed, the capture of academia by Big Pharma threatens to undermine evidence-based medicine.
The MHRA is now intending, by its Chief Executive Officer's own proud admission, to operate as an "enabler" instead of a "regulator", and as such intends to bring medicines to market within 100 days. Dame June Raine stated:

Here in the UK, the MHRA worked really hard to overcome some of the obstacles within the structure of clinical trials taking place in different jurisdictions, and that was one of the reasons we were able to licence vaccines here in the UK faster than anywhere else: because of the flexibility yet robustness shown by the MHRA.

(See this review.)
These reports questions the validity of the MHRA's "robustness" of action.

Subject Index of the Pfizer and Moderna Reports (click to expand)​

1. MISSING PATIENTS
2. INEFFECTIVENESS
3. MISSING PROCESSES
4. SAFETY & EFFICACY
5. SPIKE CAUSES DISEASE
6. SAFE & EFFECTIVE
7. PREGNANCY
8. NEUROLOGICAL HARMS
9. CHILDREN
10. MANDATES
11. MYOCARDITIS IN TEENS
12. ADVERSE EVENTS COVER-UP
13. PREGNANCY PT 2
14. COMIRNATY & EUA VACCINE
15. BREAST FEEDING & VACCINATION
16. MICRORNA
17. INFORMED CONSENT
18. VACCINE SHEDDING
19. SAFETY & EFFICACY
20. SAFETY CONCERNS
21. NEUROLOGICAL HARMS
22. PSEUDO-URIDINE EFFECTS
23. HARMFUL CYTOKINES
24. AUTHOR: WELL-FUNDED GHOST?
25. STROKES
26. APP PRE-SET SIDE-EFFECTS
27. MANDATES PT 2
28. CHILDREN PT 2
29. EXISTING REMEDY
30. ELIMINATING THE PLACEBO GROUP
31. LOTS (BATCHES) INTERCHANGEABLE?
32. DATA CONTROL
33. BOOSTERS
34. EFFICACY
35. AES/AESIS
36. ASSUMPTIONS NOT RESEARCH
37. MALE FERTILITY
38. FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE RISK
39. 12-15 YEAR OLD'S SAFETY
40. SAFETY IN PREGNANCY
41. MISINFORMATION
42. CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOLS
43. MYOCARDITIS
44. INHERITED TRAITS
45. SOP DISTRIBUTION
46. PREGNANCY PT 3
47. HAEMATOLOGICAL EVENTS
48. MISCARRIAGES
49. THROMBOEMBOLISM
50. STROKES PT 2
51. LIVER ADVERSE EVENTS
52. BIRTHRATES
53. CARDIOVASCULAR AES
54. AES IN CHILDREN <12YRS
55. PFIZER TRUSTWORTHY
56. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 1 AUTOPSIES
57. NEUROLOGICAL AES
58. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 2 AUTOPSIES
59. UNBLINDING PLACEBO GROUP
60. BELL'S PALSY
61. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 3 TURBO CANCERS
62. ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE
63. STOCK WRITE-OFF
64. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 4 ENDOMYOCARDIAL
65. ANAPHYLAXIS
66. IMMUNE-MEDIATED / AUTO-IMMUNE EVENTS
67. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 4B RHABDOMYOLYSIS
68. VASCULITIS
69. FOETAL & INFANT RISKS
70. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 4C AUTO-IMMUNITY
71. MUSCULOSKELETAL AES
72. OTHER AESIS
73. SAFE OR EFFECTIVE?
74. LIPID NANOPARTICLES
75. HISTOPATHOLOGY SERIES: PART 4D MULTI-ORGAN / SYSTEM DISEASE
76. DELAYED ANNOUNCEMENT
77. DERMATOLOGICAL AES
78. RESPIRATORY DEATHS
79. MYOCARDITIS PT 2
80. MODERNA REPRODUCTION
81. ANIMAL TESTING
82. MIXING VACCINE DOSES
83. FOETAL DEATH & LACTATION
84. UNREPORTED AES
85. SPIKE PROTEIN DISTRIBUTION
86. PROCESS-2
87. HARMS & DEATHS
88. VACCINATION FAILURE & DEATH
89. DELAYED DEATHS
90. VACCINATED COVID INFECTIONS
91. MODERNA SUBSTITUTION
92. VACCINE-ASSOCIATED ENHANCED DISEASE
Main Image: Marco Verch Professional Photographer (CC BY 2.0 Deed)

[For more expo on the above topics, go to site link (above, top) and then click on the topics u want to select]

 

[Apollonian]

FOX News/Watters does good analyzing the OBVIOUS conspiracy by which creepy Joe takes lots of money fm chicoms, suckers

 

[Apollonian]

Brain-dead creepy Joe won't turn over speech drafts when he was VP talking about the Ukrainian prosecutor of Burisma on whose board of directors sat corrupt son, dear Hunter

 

[Apollonian]

FOX News and expert discuss and go over the chicom operations in Jew S A

 

[Apollonian]

Joe Biden's green energy plan is a gift to China, experts warn, amid fears Beijing could plunder more than $100billion from US taxpayer under scheme designed to BOOST American manufacturing​

• Democrats have hailed flagship green energy legislation for revitalizing the American renewables industry, but there are fears it is playing into China's hands
• The scheme offers uncapped tax credits to firms investing in green energy, but does not block foreign companies from accessing the pot of US taxpayer money
• Data shared with DailyMail.com shows China is already involved in a dozen such projects, prompting warnings Beijing could profit from billions in US cash

By MILES DILWORTH, SENIOR REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 09:03 EST, 18 February 2024 | UPDATED: 09:03 EST, 18 February 2024

Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...n-green-energy-plan-china-manufacturing.html/

Beijing could plunder more than $100billion from US taxpayer funding thanks to a 'naïve' plan by Joe Biden to boost the American renewable industry, DailyMail.com can reveal.
Exclusive industry data shows China has already planted its flag on a dozen green energy projects that could benefit from uncapped tax credits.
The scheme, which could cost the US taxpayer $1.2trillion overall, was designed to improve American competitiveness in sectors that China currently dominates, including solar and electric vehicles.



Top Storiesby Daily Mail00:0601:00

DAVID MARCUS: Biden's brain freeze & brokenpromise to avenge Navalny

But experts are now warning it could in fact allow Chinese firms to 'extend their global monopoly' and 'dominate' the US market.
The issue has also divided once tight-knit communities across America as huge Chinese corporations land in their backyards, sparking environmental and security concerns.

A dozen projects with links to Chinese firms have been launched in the US that would be eligible for billions of dollars of taxpayer funding designed to boost American manufacturing

A proposed $2.4billion EV battery plant in Marshall, Michigan, spearheaded by Ford, has caught the attention of lawmakers after an investigation revealed four 'highly troubling' Chinese firms were tied to the project

The Biden administration passed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022, unlocking billions of dollars in uncapped tax credits for firms investing in green energy projects across the US
TRENDING

FBI director warns China's computer attacks are scaling up




Trump's cognitive decline is worse than Biden's professor claims

A backlash against a plan by CCP-linked firm Gotion to build a $2.4billion EV battery plant in Green Charter Township, Michigan, saw locals overthrow their entire township board after it backed the proposal.
And last month a joint House committee investigation found four 'highly troubling' Chinese firms were behind another EV battery project in the Wolverine State.
Industry experts and Republicans are now urgently calling on the President to bar Beijing from swallowing billions of dollars of US taxpayer money and focus support exclusively on American firms.
Jeff Ferry, chief economist at the non-profit Coalition for a Prosperous America, said the Biden administration had left the subsidies open to international firms because it was 'naïve' and the 'political equivalent to people who wear flowers in their hair'.
'They're going to get f***** over,' he told DailyMail.com. 'In the real world, it's nasty and competitive.
'The bottom line is that if you take markets like electric vehicle (EV) batteries, or solar cells, where China already has a dominant global position, and you allow its firms to own facilities in the US and access the US taxpayer, you're allowing them to extend their global monopoly.'

Billions on the way to Beijing?​

The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was hailed by Democrats as a significant step forward in combating climate change while reviving US manufacturing.
Unlike similar Obama-era legislation, it offers tax credits based on output, rather than investment, allowing federal support to grow with production.
This has been welcomed by some within the US energy sector for finally providing it with the muscle it needs to compete with China.
But concerns have been raised over the spiraling costs of the scheme - and the fact that Chinese firms can access it.
An initial estimate by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), published by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), put the total cost of the scheme at $369billion by 2033.
Goldman Sachs, however, published an analysis in March last year suggesting the figure was likely to be closer to $1.2trillion.
The CBO published revised estimates in May, putting the cost at $650billion.
The total cost includes a myriad of green subsidies, but those relevant to the production of solar and EV batteries are now estimated to cost anywhere between $133billion by JCT estimates and $190billion, according to Goldman Sachs.
This is of particular interest to Chinese firms, who want to expand their dominance of these sectors. Beijing is already linked to a dozen projects in the US worth more than $10billion in investments that could be eligible for taxpayer funds, according to data shared exclusively with DailyMail.com by nonpartisan business group E2.
The US Treasury has said Chinese companies make up around 15 per cent of all US solar manufacturing investment following the IRA's passage.
Michigan community slams Chinese-owned firm buying up farmland

China owns 383,935 acres of US farmland as of December 2021, with almost half of it in Texas
Former counterespionage director warns of CCP spying in Michigan


Just under half of all such green energy projects are backed by foreign companies overall, according to the E2 data.
But Ferry points out that the ones backed by China are among the largest in terms of estimated production.
A $200,000 facility due to be built by Chinese firm Trina Solar in Wilmer, Texas, is projected to produce 5 gigawatts of energy per year.
In contrast, a plan for a solar plant in Providence, Rhode Island, by Massachusetts firm Gridwealth, has an estimated annual output of just 1.7 megawatts.
Ferry believes Chinese firms could plausibly replicate their current global market shares in solar (80 per cent) and EV batteries (56 per cent) if they are allowed unfettered access to the US market.
If this was the case, he estimates more than $100billion of US taxpayer money could be funneled to Beijing via the IRA.
'Chinese companies have the ability to drive prices down and crowd out every American company,' he added.
'There's a very real chance that 80 per cent of the solar manufacturing capacity in this country in five to ten years will be Chinese-owned, unless they are excluded from this scheme.'
Former US Ambassadors Pete Hoekstra and Joseph Cella wrote in RealClearPolicy last month that 'Chinese companies, many deeply tied to the CCP are establishing EV battery plants across the country, increasing America's dependence on Chinese technology and undercutting US domestic industry and national security, and may receive taxpayer dollars to do so'.
But the pair, who now spearhead the Michigan - China Economic and Security Review Group, added that 'the most active opposition against China's incursion into America's EV industry isn't coming from Washington, but from local activists'.

Locals leading the fightback​

Marjorie Steele, who's family homestead is around five miles from the proposed Gotion site in Green Charter, founded the Economic Development Responsibility Alliance in response to a number of new China-linked projects in Michigan.
She believes the IRA 'doesn't really make any sense' in its current form.
'The economic justification for so many of these plants is, well, China's dominating the EV manufacturing market, we need to bring this manufacturing domestically,' she adds.
'Then they give it to international foreign companies, even those owned by our biggest competitor.'
The ejection of the entire township board who signed off on the Gotion plan was hailed as a stunning victory for local resistance, while residents in Manteno, Illinois, are taking legal action to block another Gotion factory from being built in the area.
But it may still prove futile.
The Green Charter is already under construction and Gotion purchased the 270 acres of land it requires for the project in August.
Similarly, residents who formed the Stop the Marshall Megasite campaign in opposition to another China-backed EV battery plant in Michigan were powerless to stop the destruction of an historic 1870s farmhouse to make way for the factory.
Both Michigan projects have sparked national security concerns.
Residents of Michigan township change locks after ousting board

The proposed site for Chinese EV battery plant in Green Charter Township, near Big Rapids, Michigan, has sparked security concerns due to its proximity to a US Army training camp

Residents in Marshall, Michigan, formed the Stop the Marshall Megasite campaign in opposite to the China-linked Ford battery plant, but were powerless to stop the destruction of an 1870s farmhouse (pictured) to make way for the site

Green Charter resident Marjorie Steele (second from right) founded the Economic Development Responsibility Alliance in response to plans to bring Chinese firms to the state

Campaigners in Green Charter threw out the entire township board after it backed plans for the Gotion battery plant. (L-R) Residents Kelly Cushway, Lori Brock, Debbie Diegert and Jeff Thorne protest the deal

A graphic rendering of the battery plant Gotion seeks to build in Green Charter Township
Critics pointed to the proximity of the Green Charter battery plant to a US military camp also raised national security concerns, while two House Committees have urged the government to launch an investigation into Beijing's involvement in the Marshall plant.
The $2billion project has been shrouded in controversy since the Detroit-based car maker announced it intended to use technology supplied by Chinese firm Contemporary Amperex Technology, or CATL, the world's largest battery maker for EVs.
But a joint investigation by the select committee on the CCP and the committee on energy and commerce found four other 'highly troubling' firms with links to the CCP and People's Liberation Army were tied to the project.
Meanwhile, the sleepy Midwestern town of Pataskala, Ohio, has been stirred by the news that Chinese firm Longi, the world's largest solar panel manufacturer, is headed its way.
An opposition group called Not in Pataskala has warned against a 'red menace', while adopting a logo with an X behind a hammer and sickle.
The joint $600million project with Illuminate USA and Invenergy, the largest US private renewables developer, has a proposed capacity of 5 gigawatts, making it one of the biggest such facilities in the country and eligible for around $350million a year in federal tax credits, according to a Wall Street Journal calculation.
Ford has said that as the sole owner of the plant in Michigan, CATL or any of the other Chinese firms involved would not be eligible to receive taxpayer funding under the IRA's rules.
But Ferry argues that they will still benefit indirectly from Ford's funding, which will help the US car maker pay China for its battery technology.

A boost to American business?​

When it comes to revitalizing America's flagging renewables industry, however, the economist admits Biden's plan is a 'step in the right direction'.
There is evidence that Biden's plan is helping US manufacturers, with more than $100billion announced in new investments last year.
Stephanie Bosh, of the Solar Energy Industries Association, told DailyMail.com that the IRA had put the sector in a position to 'break free' from its reliance on imports from China.
But Mike Carr, executive director of the Solar Manufacturers Coalition has said that while the scheme was 'critical in supporting investments' in the US, American firms 'are still facing headwinds that may jeopardize these projects'.
He added: 'With deteriorating solar market conditions due to continued market manipulation by China, the future of US solar manufacturing is under attack.'
Regardless of the boost to American projects, the question remains as to why China is still being allowed to benefit from US taxpayer funds.
Republicans have set out to change this, with a bill tabled by Senator Marco Rubio (R. Fl) and Carol Miller (R. WV) aimed at banning Chinese firms from accessing US green energy subsidies.
The US Treasury is due to set out new criteria on eligibility for subsidies under the IRA, which could include restrictions on foreign access.
It has previously said that foreign investment was 'subject to strict safeguards to ensure national security'.
Christine McDaniel, senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, believes such a move is likely and would bring the total taxpayer funding flowing to Beijing well under the $100bn mark.
But until that happens, the door remains open.

 

[Apollonian]

Cong.-man Comer says now the deposition of corrupt son, Hunter, can proceed to open hearing phase--as Hunter had been yammering that he wanted, instead of the closed-door hearing

 

[Apollonian]

Note how creepy Joe and admin are consistently nice and accommodating to chicoms--after all, creepy Joe took lots of their money, didn't he?

 

[Apollonian]

Well, it's just another charge to be added to the rest in creepy Joe impeachment, suckers--violation of 2nd Amendment