Well, globalist-satanist project to mass-murder & depopulate people is well confirmed, morons, but, of course, u're too stupid to face sad facts

[Apollonian]

Deagel’s Depopulation Forecast confirmed by Heavily Censored Pfizer Documents​

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON DECEMBER 24, 2023

Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/12/24/deagels-depopulation-forecast-confirmed-by-pfizer/

---

A controversial forecast by Deagel, a global intelligence and consulting firm, gained attention in 2020 for its startling prediction of a significant depopulation event across the Western World by 2025.
This was a very bold claim to make.
‘Your Government is trying to kill you’ is even bolder.
But unfortunately, these bold claims are now backed up with a mountain of evidence, and most of that evidence can be found in the confidential Pfizer documents that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration has been forced to publish by court order.
And sadly, the evidence strongly suggests that Covid-19 vaccination is causing mass depopulation.

---

What is Deagel?​

The Deagel corporation is a minor branch of US military intelligence, one of the many secretive organizations which collect data for high-level decision-making purposes and prepares confidential briefing documents for agencies like the National Security Agency, the United Nations, and the World Bank.
It is known to have contributed to a Stratfor report on North Korea. With this kind of pedigree, Deagel should be seen as a legitimate player in the intelligence community and not merely a disinformation asset.
This means its population predictions for 2025, as well as its industrial output predictions on a nation-by-nation basis, are not mere fantasy but instead based on strategic assumptions which are shared and well understood by other players in the intelligence community.

What has Deagel Predicted?​

Deagel.com’s [infamous] 2025 forecast was removed from their website sometime in 2020. However, thanks to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive, we are able to view the original predictions before discovered by critical thinkers.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United Kingdom would see its population decline by 77.1% by the year 2025.
Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United States would see its population decline by 68.5 % by the year 2025.
Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Germany would see its population decline by 65.1% by the year 2025.
Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Australia would see its population decline by 34.6% by the year 2025.
Source
While also predicting a huge decline among many other Western countries.
Source
A full list of Deagel’s original apocalyptic depopulation predictions can be viewed here.
Sadly, the confidential Pfizer documents coupled with staggering deaths among children suggest Deagel’s depopulation figures were not just an estimation, but a target.

The Confidential Pfizer Documents​

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.
But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.
Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on 1st June 2022.
One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 12 of the confidential document contains data on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection in pregnancy and lactation.

Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby​

Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.
Forty-six-percent of the mothers (124) exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.
Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal death.

Source – Page 12
A total of 4 serious foetus/baby cases were reported due to exposure to the Pfizer injection.

But here’s where things get rather concerning. Pfizer state that of the 270 pregnancies they have absolutely no idea what happened in 238 of them.
But here are the known outcomes of the remaining pregnancies –

There were 34 outcomes altogether at the time of the report, but 5 of them were still pending. Pfizer note that only 1 of the 29 known outcomes were normal, whilst 28 of the 29 outcomes resulted in the loss/death of the baby. This equates to 97% of all known outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child.
When we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child. This equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figure.
So here we have our first piece of evidence that something is amiss when it comes to administering the Pfizer Covid-19 injection during pregnancy.
Here’s the guidance taken from the UK Government’s ‘REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’ document –

That’s how the guidance read in December 2020 anyway. Unfortunately, just a month or so later, the UK Government and other Governments around the world revised that guidance to read as follows –
Source – Page 7
This is still the official guidance as of June 2022, and leads to several questions requiring urgent answers when we consider since early 2021 pregnant women have been told Covid-19 vaccination is perfectly safe.
You only have to look at the things women were told to avoid during pregnancy prior to being told it’s perfectly safe to take an experimental injection to realise something just isn’t right here –

• Smoked fish,
• Soft cheese,
• Wet paint,
• Coffee,
• Herbal tea,
• Vitamin supplements,
• Processed Junk foods.

These are just to name a few, and the list is endless.
So let’s start with the ‘Pregnancy’ section of the official guidance. In December 2020 the guidance stated ‘Covid-19 vaccination is not recommended during pregnancy‘. Just a month or so later this guidance stated ‘Animal studies do not indicate harmful effects with respect to pregnancy etc.’
So let’s take a look at the animal studies in question.
But before we do it’s worth pointing out that the official guidance states, as of June 2022, that ‘administration of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus’. So why on earth has every single pregnant woman up and down the land been actively coerced into getting this injection?

Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Animal Study finding an increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility​

The limited animal study talked about in the official guidance actually uncovered the risk of significant harm to the developing foetus, but medicine regulators in the USA, UK and Australia actively chose to remove this information from public documents.
The actual study can be viewed in full here and is titled ‘Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, a mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine‘.
The study was performed on 42 female Wistar Han rats. Twenty-one were given the Pfizer Covid-19 injection, and 21 were not.
Here are the results of the study –

Source
The results of the number of foetuses observed to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the control group were 3/3 (2.1). But the results of the number of foetuses to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the vaccinated group were 6/12 (8.3). Therefore on average, the rate of occurrence was 295% higher in the vaccinated group.
Supernumerary ribs also called accessory ribs are an uncommon variant of extra ribs arising most commonly from the cervical or lumbar vertebrae.
So what this study found is evidence of abnormal foetal formation and birth defects caused by the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.
But the abnormal findings of the study don’t end there. The ‘pre-implantation loss’ rate in the vaccinated group of rats was double that of the control group.

Source
Pre-implantation loss refers to fertilised ova that fail to implant. Therefore, this study suggests that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection reduces the chances of a woman being able to get pregnant. So, therefore, increases the risk of infertility.
So with this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that “Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy”? And how have they managed to state “It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility“?
The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up.
We know this thanks to a ‘Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).
A document titled ‘Delegate’s Overview and Request for ACV’s Advice‘ that was created on 11th January 2021 was published under the FOI request. Page 30 onwards of the document shows a ‘review of the product information’, and highlights changes that should be made to the ‘Non-clinical evaluation report’ prior to official publication.
The changes were requested to be made by Pfizer prior to the next product information update.
Some of those requested changes were as follows –

The Module 4 evaluator requested Pfizer remove their claim that “Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity”.
Why?

The Module 4 evaluator told Pfizer that ‘Pregnancy Category B2’ was considered appropriate and requested that they added the following line –
“A combined fertility and developmental toxicity study in rats showed increased occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses from COMIRNATY- treated female rats”.
But here’s a reminder of how the official document issued to the general public reads –

Source – Page 7
The pregnancy category was changed to ‘B1’, no line was included on the increased occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs in fetuses, and they instead included the line that was requested to be removed claiming “Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy…”.
Here’s the official description of the pregnancy categories –

Source
That’s quite a big difference between the two categories. But the fact that the Module 4 evaluator even thought Pregnancy Category B2 was appropriate is highly questionable when you consider the results, as we revealed above, of the “inadequate” and extremely small animal study that was performed to evaluate the safety of administering the Pfizer Covid-19 injection during pregnancy.
So not only do we have evidence that the Pfizer vaccine may cause between 82% and 97% of recipients to lose their babies, we also now have evidence that the Pfizer vaccine leads to an increased risk of suffering infertility or birth defects.
Both of these examples alone support the suggestion that Covid-19 vaccination is going to lead to depopulation. But unfortunately, the evidence doesn’t end there.

----------------------------------------------[END OF PART ONE; SEE BELOW FOR PART 2]---------------------------------------------​

 

[Apollonian]

------------------------------------------------------[HERE'S PART 2 TO ABOVE, SUCKERS]---------------------------------------------------------

Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal the Covid-19 Vaccine accumulates in the Ovaries​

Another study, which can be found in the long list of confidential Pfizer documents that the FDA have been forced to publish via a court order here, was carried out on Wistar Han rats, 21 of which were female and 21 of which were male.
Each rat received a single intramuscular dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection and then the content and concentration of total radioactivity in blood, plasma and tissues were determined at pre-defined points following administration.
In other words, the scientists conducting the study measured how much of the Covid-19 injection has spread to other parts of the body such as the skin, liver, spleen, heart etc.
But one of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time.
An ‘ovary’ is one of a pair of female glands in which the eggs form and the female hormones oestrogen and progesterone are made.

In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.
The scientists, however, did not conduct any further research on the accumulation after a period of 48 hours, so we simply don’t know whether that concerning accumulation continued.
But official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, offers some concerning clues as to the consequences of that accumulation on the ovaries.
Figures for the number of individuals suffering from ovarian cancer show that the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.
Ovarian Cancer – Source
The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland’s dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering Ovarian cancer increasing significantly.
Click to enlarge
That concludes our third piece of evidence. So now we know –

• Confidential Pfizer documents show a miscarriage rate between 82 and 97%,
• The only animal study performed to prove the safety of administering the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy indicated an increased risk of infertility and birth defects,
• and further confidential Pfizer documents reveal the vaccine accumulates in the ovaries.

Unfortunately, we also have evidence that Covid-19 vaccination increases the risk of newborn babies sadly losing their lives, and it also comes from the Public Health Scotland ‘Covid-19 Wider Impacts’ dashboard.

Newborn Baby Deaths hit critical levels for 2nd time in 7 Months in March 2022​

Official figures reveal that the rate of neonatal deaths increased to 4.6 per 1000 live births in March 2022, a 119% increase on the expected rate of deaths. This means the neonatal mortality rate breached an upper warning threshold known as the ‘control limit’ for the second time in at least four years.
The last time it breached was in September 2021, when neonatal deaths per 1000 live births climbed to 5.1. Although the rate fluctuates month to month, the figure for both September 2021 and March 2022 is on a par with levels that were last typically seen in the late 1980s.

Click to enlarge
Source
Public Health Scotland (PHS) did not formally announce they had launched an investigation, but this is what they are supposed to do when the upper warning threshold is reached, and they did so back in 2021.
At the time, PHS said the fact that the upper control limit has been exceeded “indicates there is a higher likelihood that there are factors beyond random variation that may have contributed to the number of deaths that occurred”.
Our final piece of evidence to support the claim that Covid-19 vaccination is going to lead to depopulation comes in the form of more real-world data, but this time from the USA.

Covid-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Miscarriage by at least 1,517%​

According to the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC)) Vaccine Adverse Event Database (VAERS), as of April 2022, a total of 4,113 foetal deaths had been reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, 3,209 of which were reported against the Pfizer injection.

Credit: Health Impact News
The CDC has admitted that just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to VAERS therefore the true figure could be many times worse. But to put these numbers into perspective, there were only 2,239 reported foetal deaths to VAERS in the 30 years prior to the emergency use authorisation of the Covid-19 injections in December of 2020. (Source)
And a further study which can be viewed here, found that the risk of suffering a miscarriage following Covid-19 vaccination is 1,517% higher than the risk of suffering a miscarriage following flu vaccination.

The true risk could however actually be much higher because pregnant women are a target group for Flu vaccination, whereas they are only a small demographic in terms of Covid-19 vaccination so far.

63,060% increase in Child Excess Deaths across Europe​

In the scorching summer of 2021, a momentous decision swept across Europe, sparking a whirlwind of emotions among parents, who had fallen for the 24/7 propaganda, eagerly awaiting a ray of hope for their children.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) had finally granted emergency use approval for the use of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 12 to 15.
Relief and elation surged through the hearts of countless naive parents who saw this as a beacon of protection against the alleged pandemic.
Yet, the winds of fortune took an unexpected turn as the vaccine rollout for children commenced. Startling reports emerged, revealing a distressing surge in excess deaths among the young ones across the continent. The sense of optimism quickly faded among the thousands of families affected, and was replaced by a grim reality that cast a shadow over the hopes of many.
Tragically, the statistics paint a haunting picture, with a staggering 63,060% surge in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 by the twenty-second week of 2023. These numbers whisper a chilling tale of consequences that were foreseen by many silenced and heavily censored voices.
During week 21 of 2021, the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, first to children aged 12 to 15 and later to the age group of 5 to 11.

Source

Source
However, the weeks following the approval witnessed a shocking rise in excess deaths among children, an upward trend that persisted unabated.
Between week 22 of 2021 and week 52 of 2021, an alarming tally of 919 excess deaths among 0 to 14-year-old children should have sent shockwaves through the continent. But the data was suppressed.
The contrast couldn’t have been starker, as the period between week 1 and week 21 of 2021 saw 218 fewer deaths than expected.

Source
And the fact the surge in excess deaths aligns perfectly with the EMA’s approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 cannot be merely dismissed as coincidence.
The distressing trend continued throughout 2022, with a total of 1,639 excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across the 26 European countries, painting a grim reality that cannot be dismissed.

Source
Sadly, as week 22 of 2023 arrived, the haunting truth emerged as 590 more excess deaths were recorded, bringing the heart-wrenching total to 3,148 deaths among children.

Source
The somber figures reveal an unprecedented 63,060% surge in excess deaths since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Covid-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.
The contrast with the previous period couldn’t be starker.

From week 21 of 2019 to week 21 of 2021, 5 fewer deaths occurred among children aged 0 to 14 than expected.

Week 21 to 52 of 2019 (Pre-“Pandemic”)
Source
The entirety of 2020 witnessed a notable decline of 230 fewer deaths than expected, painting a chilling narrative.

Source
Meanwhile the year 2021 up to week 21 prior to emergency use authorisation of the Covid-19 injection for children across Europe witnessed 218 fewer deaths than expected.

Source
The staggering increase in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 26 European countries, including the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany, paints a bleak picture of an astounding 63,060% surge since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.

This distressing reality raises serious concerns, considering the experimental nature of the injections and its previous avoidance due to the risks of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED).

Moreover, administering the vaccine to children, who were not at significant risk from the alleged Covid-19 virus, seems perplexing in light of the 449 fewer deaths recorded among children aged 0 to 14 across Europe in 2020, from the onset of the alleged pandemic to the year’s end.

Source
With the risk of this turning into an essay that concludes our evidence for today, but there is plenty more of it out there and we will make sure to report on it.
But with –

• Confidential Pfizer documents showing a miscarriage rate between 82% and 97%,
• The only animal study performed to prove the safety of administering the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy indicating an increased risk of infertility and birth defects,
• Further confidential Pfizer documents revealing the vaccine accumulates in the ovaries, data from Scotland revealing cases of Ovarian cancer are at an all time high,
• Further data from Scotland revealing deaths of new born babies have hit critical levels for the second time in seven months,
• CDC VAERS data showing Covid-19 vaccination increases the risk of suffering a miscarriage by at least 1,517%,
• And EMA approval of the COVID Vaccine for Children causing a shocking 63,060% increase in Child excess deaths across Europe;

It looks like we already have more than enough evidence to make the claim that Covid-19 vaccination is causing mass depopulation, and Deagel’s apocalyptic figures for the Western World in 2025 are on track to be realised.

 

[Apollonian]

REVEALED: HALF of the WHO's transgender health committee members have NO medical background and the majority are activists​

• Most members of panel mostly social justice activists and human rights lawyers
• Called for the removal mental health evaluations and barriers to medical care
• READ MORE: WHO accused of 'trans bias' after calling for self-ID to become right

By CASSIDY MORRISON SENIOR HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and JAMES REINL, SOCIAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT, FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 14:25 EST, 9 January 2024 | UPDATED: 10:26 EST, 10 January 2024

Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...O-medical-background-majority-activists.html/

[see vid at site link, above]

Half of the members on the World Health Organization's transgender health policy committee are not qualified medical experts - and most are gender activists.
One of the panelists is a controversial Canadian trans TikToker who believes puberty blockers should be prescribed to all children, regardless of their gender identity, so they can 'choose' their gender rather than being assigned one by society.
Another member believes that transitioning causes no health problems and claims the only 'actual side effects' of getting a sex change are a 'significantly improved quality of life... and trans joy.'
A number of women's rights and LGBTQ+ organizations fear the UN agency - whose recommendations are highly influential - has been captured by a 'trans bias'.

Florence Ashley, a law professor in Canada, believes puberty blockers should be prescribed to all children regardless of their gender identity so they can 'choose' their gender rather than being assigned one by society

Nearly two-thirds of the panelists are human rights lawyers, activists, and policy advisors, while just slightly over a third of them are trained medical doctors
TRENDING

Controversial zoologist is gathering pathogens with pandemic potential


More than 900 chemicals raise risk of breast cancer, says study


Ex White House doc admits lab leak 'is NOT a conspiracy theory'...

The WHO last month published the biographies of 21 experts who have been invited to help formulate guidelines that will shape how countries treat gender dysphoria.
Of the a 21-member panel who have been invited to help formulate guidelines that will shape how countries treat gender dysphoria, 11 have no formal medical training.
Seven are trans themselves, ten have a medical background and of those, eight are doctors.
The rest are a mixture of activists, social justice advocates, human rights lawyers, STD researchers, and policy advisors.
Several are also members of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), a nonprofit dedicated to promoting medical treatments for gender dysphoria which has been accused of being too pro-medication.
The health researchers who qualified to join the panel have training in the control and prevention of HIV/AIDS with little emphasis on the parameters of delivering transition services known as gender-affirming care.
Ashley - a trans woman who uses the pronouns 'they/them that b****' - is the committee's most controversial and outspoken member.
They have a significant TikTok following where they express hardline views on trans issues, calling for mental health checks on trans children to be scrapped before they are given puberty blockers and hormone drugs.
Ashley said on TikTok recently when discussing an academic paper they co-authored on the subject: 'Is there any reason to ask people to go through a lengthy and complex gender assessment in order to access gender-affirming care, or is that useless and should the time best be put in supporting decision-making.
'And what our article concludes is that there's really no evidence that gender assessments work... it's just a lengthier process for no real reason.'
They added: 'Gender assessments are really an unnecessary form of gatekeeping that trans communities have been opposing for a while.'
Trans activist discusses guidelines for medical sex changes

Teddy Cook, another member of the panel, has painted a rosy picture of the transition process as entirely positive, has said 'actual side effects' of transition care include a 'significantly improved quality of life... a dramatic decrease in distress, depression and anxiety and a substantial increase of gender euphoria and trans joy'

Insurance claims for puberty blockers in the US have doubled since 2017
Ashley - who has a 'be gay, do crimes' tattoo, has also co-written a study that said puberty blockers and hormone therapies 'ought to be treated as the default option' for children with gender dysphoria.
WHO spokesman Tarik Jašarević said the guidelines on trans care would focus on 'adults only' and not the controversial use of cross-sex hormones, suppressants and surgeries on children.
'WHO guidelines are always based on balancing of available evidence, human rights principles, consideration of harms and benefits and inputs of end users and beneficiaries,' Jašarević said.
Still, some members of the panel are in favor of allowing such treatments for children as young as 13.
The formation of the group has caused internal anger, with the UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls saying the group was too 'one-sided.'
Reem Alsalem wrote to the WHO's director general to say she believed the committee contained 'significant unmanaged conflicts of interest'.
She added: 'Stakeholders whose views differ from those held by transgender activist organisations do not appear to have been invited.
'Such stakeholders include experts from European public health authorities who have taken the lead on developing an evidence-based and consequently cautious approach to youth gender transitions (eg England, Sweden and Finland).'
The WHO group will set global guidelines for the ways that healthcare workers around the world can increase access 'and utilisation of quality and respectful health services by trans and gender-diverse people'.

In many cases, gender transition surgeries are irreversible, whereas puberty blockers and hormone therapies can be reversed

Luka Hein, a detransitioner, showing the scars on her chest after her irreversible double mastectomy she was given at 16
The WHO also said that guidelines will focus on five areas of policy: the provision of transition care including hormone therapies, health polices that support gender-inclusive care, and laws that respect an individual's right to express their own gender in the way that feels right to them.
These laws often include new updates to official documents such as IDs to reflect the individual's self-identified gender, not the one they were born with.
Stella O' Malley, psychotherapist and executive director of the campaign group Genspect, told DailyMail.com: 'The WHO panel is made up mostly of social justice and human rights lawyers who believe the gender affirmative approach is the only option... [They] will determine care guidelines for trans people, yet they do not have anyone to represent critical balance on their panel.

Pediatrics authority STILL backs transgender care for under 18s ​

America's leading child doctors at the American Academy of Pediatrics are continuing to back transgender healthcare services for minors under 18 - despite concerns about long-term risks.

'The gender affirmative approach is presumed by WHO to be the only way forward and thereby dismisses conventional psychotherapy.
'This is a narrow minded and heavily biased approach. The WHO are making a grave mistake, they should pause this process and consult with the many professionals who hold different approaches.'
An online petition undersigned by more than 8,000 entities since December, when the WHO group was finalized, has called for the organization to stop the group's meeting in February.
The petition was organized by Jamie Reed, the former caseworker at a trans clinic at St. Louis Children's hospital who blew the whistle on kids with mental health problems being fast-tracked onto cross-sex hormones there.
In a statement, Reed, now the executive director of the LGBT Courage Coalition, a campaign group, called the WHO panelists a group of 'agenda-driven activists with little or no scientific expertise.'
'Some are well-known, radical activists who promote experimental medical interventions and stigmatize exploratory therapy,' said Reed. The panel should include 'experts with a diversity of perspectives,' she added.
Thousands of signatories are private individuals, including psychologists, nurses, and parents of detransitioners, as well as organizations like Genspect, which has been critical of medical transitions.
In addition to pressuring the WHO to rebalance its 'biased' panel, the authors of the petition say that the organization has failed to give the public enough time to voice their concerns about the makeup of the influential group. The public comment period ended on January 8.
The petition said: 'This is lightning-fast speed for any organization, but especially for WHO, which must consult with various stakeholders, commission evidence reviews from third parties, and potentially engage independent experts to help oversee the guideline development process.
'None of this can be realistically accomplished within WHO's artificially constrained time frame.'

Who makes up the panel?​

​

Pictured: Alicia Krüger
Alicia Krüger is a trained pharmacist with training in the epidemiology of sexually transmitted and viral diseases.
She currently works as an epidemiologist and pharmacist in Brazil.
A transgender woman herself, Krüger co-founded and presided over the Brazilian Professional Association for Transgender Health (BRPATH), a WPATH affiliate.

Pictured: Apako Willimas
Apako Willimas is an activist for the human rights of transgender and gender non-conforming persons in Uganda where he founded the Tranz Network Uganda (TNU).
Willimas has a background in social work. He is also a lawyer with about eight years of experience defending LGBTQ+ people.

Pictured: Ayouba El Hamri
Ayouba El Hamri is a trans activist in Morocco who co-founded a Moroccan LGBTQ advocacy group and serves on the steering committee for the African Trans Network and the Global Network of People living with HIV (GNP+).

Pictured: Chris McLachlan
Chris McLachlan, who was born female but identifies more with masculine gender, is a member of the Sexuality and Gender Division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, where he helped develop the first and definitive South African Gender Affirming Healthcare Guideline.
He is also part of the core team that developed the Practice Guidelines for Psychology Professionals Working with Sexually and Gender-Diverse People.

Pictured: Cianán Russell
Cianán Russell is a trained chemist, policy, and trans rights advocate at the Belgium-based think tank ILGA-Europe.
He started out as a LGBTQ+ activist in the US in the 1990s and has since worked in transgender rights groups in Asia and Europe.
Russel is also the Director of Trans Survivors Network, an international nonprofit that focuses on research, advocacy, and raising awareness related to the care of trans people exposed to sexual violence, sexual assault, and rape.

--------------------------------------------[END OF PART ONE; SEE BELOW FOR PART 2]---------------------------------------------

 

[Apollonian]

-------------------------------------------------[HERE'S PART 2 TO ABOVE]------------------------------------------------

Pictured: Elma de Vries
Elma de Vries is a family doctor and activist for the healthcare needs of South Africa’s trans community who works at the Nelson Mandela University’s School of Medicine.
She is also a founding member of the Professional Association for Transgender Health South Africa (PATHSA).

Pictured: Erika Castellanos
Erika Castellanos is a trans woman and activist from Belize now living in the Netherlands.
She completed a certificate program for conducting research on LGBTQ+ health issues and founded the first network of people in Belize living with HIV like her.
Castellanos currently leads GATE’s work in building up the trans healthcare rights movement.

Pictured: Eszter Kismödi
Eszter Kismödi is an international human rights lawyer specializing in sexual and reproductive health. She leads the Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters group, which oversees an academic journal that publishes a wide range of research pertaining to sexual health and gender rights.
Kismödi also has a long history of working with global health organizations, including the WHO and the World Association for Sexual Health as a human rights advisor.

Pictured: Felisbela de Oliveira Gaspar
Felisbela de Oliveira Gaspar is a gender policy advisor for the Minister of Health of Mozambique, where she trains health workers on addressing gender in their work treating patients.
Since 2016, she has also advised the WHO Geneva office on the development of strategies for using traditional and alternative medicine in a wide range of settings, not just in treating gender dysphoria.
Florence Ashley is a trans woman and law professor in Canada specializing in ethics in medicine.
They authored a book called Gender/Fucking: The Pleasures and Politics of Living in a Gendered Body as well as reports condemning the continued use of harmful conversion therapy to reverse a person’s homosexuality.

Pictured: Gale Knudson
Gale Knudson is a medical doctor and psychiatrist in Vancouver, Canada who has participated on several panels to develop transgender healthcare guidelines, including the Supporting Sexuality Across the Gender Spectrum panel at the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists.
She co-authored several versions of the WPATH Standards of Care and co-leads the Global Education Institute and is a former President of WPATH and the Canadian Professional Association for Transgender Health (CPATH).

Pictured: Phan Thi Thu Huong
Phan Thi Thu Huong is a physician specializing in the prevention and control of sexually transmitted and infectious diseases and the Director General of the Vietnam Administration of HIV/AIDS Control.
She has also served as the Vietnam Coordinator of the French Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis and a health professor at Hanoi Medical University.

Pictured: Rena Janamnuaysook
Rena Janamnuaysook is the program manager for Implementation Science at the Institute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI) in Bangkok, Thailand. There, she established the Tangerine Community Health Clinic, the first transgender-led health clinic in the region.
Janamnuaysook is a fellow in the National Institutes of Health’s CHIMERA D43 program that built a team of researchers from Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand get design studies addressing the link between HIV diagnoses and mental illness.

Pictured: Saima Paracha
Saima Paracha, one of two pediatricians on the panel, works in the National AIDS Control Program of Pakistan with emphasis on HIV and infections that often go alongside it, such as viral hepatitis and STDs.
Much of her work, primarily in Pakistan, has centered on improving HIV/AIDS diagnostics and training other healthcare workers in HIV and tuberculosis.

Pictured: Sanjay Sharma
Sanjay Sharma, who is also a trained pediatrician, was the founding director and CEO of the Association for Transgender Health in India.
As an advisor to the Transgender Empowerment Board of Delhi, Dr Sharma helped formulate sweeping legal protections for trans people against discrimination in India.

Pictured: Shobini Rajan
Shobini Rajan is a medical doctors and Deputy Director General at the National AIDS Control Organization.
She led the agenda of Transgender Health in India and was instrumental in writing the Indian government’s ‘White Paper on Comprehensive Health-related Services for Transgender Health.’
Teddy Cook works in policy and advocacy projects and is the Director of Community Health at ACON, a leading HIV and LGBTQ+ health advocacy organization based in Australia.
He is part of a wide array of trans rights advisory groups, including Australia's largest LGBTIQ health and wellbeing survey called the Expert Advisory Group and Gender Advisory Board.

Pictured: Walter Bockting
Walter Bockting is a doctor of psychiatry and researcher with the New York State Psychiatric Institute, leading the Area of Gender, Sexuality, and Health.
He has served as president of WPATH and is the lead investigator on three studies on the subject funded by the National Institute of Health, including one looking into the quality of life of trans and nonbinary individuals following gender-affirming surgery.

Pictured: Walter Bouman
Walter Bouman is a medical doctor and trans health specialist in the UK.
He specializes in prescribing, dosing, and monitoring transition hormone treatment, providing referrals for transition surgeries and other medical interventions such as hair removal and speech and language therapy, and providing psychological support for trans people.
Dr Bouman is the founding member of the European Professional Association for Transgender Health (EPATH) and the British Association of Gender Identity Specialists (BAGIS).

Pictured: Yanyan Araña
Yanyan Araña is a trans woman and activist in the Philippines.
She is program manager of an organization called LoveYourself Inc. which provides sexual health and gender transition services, research, and events, to the trans community there.

Pictured: Zakaria Nasser
Zakaria Nasser is an activist based in Lebanon and was a member of the underground LGBTQ+ rights group Meem.
He has since founded the group Qorras, which collects and disseminates reports on civil rights and policies from a feminist, queer perspective.

 

[Apollonian]

Now Anthony Fauci's former boss Francis Collins concedes Covid lab leak was NOT a conspiracy - despite spearheading attacks against scientists who touted theory​

• Francis Collins was instrumental in the publication of the natural origins theory
• Dr Collins said to have hidden NIH involvement in funding gain of function work
• READ MORE: Fauci flip flops during first 7-hour session of grilling before House

By CASSIDY MORRISON SENIOR HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 11:51 EST, 15 January 2024 | UPDATED: 11:54 EST, 15 January 2024

Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...attacks-against-scientists-touted-theory.html

Anthony Fauci's former boss admitted to Congress that the Covid lab leak theory was credible - despite previously calling it a 'very destructive conspiracy'.
Dr Francis Collins, former head of the National Institutes of Health, testified in a closed-door session with the House coronavirus subcommittee on Friday about his role during America's pandemic response.
Dr Collins was involved in suppressing the theory that Covid likely escaped from a Chinese biolab, a theory which implicated the sprawling agency he headed up. It was previously revealed that the NIH oversaw grants funding risky 'gain of function' research to make viruses more transmissible and/or deadly.
In a significant U-turn, House Republicans who led the hearing revealed that Dr Collins, 73, told them that the lab leak hypothesis was not a conspiracy theory.

Dr Collins is pictured during a 2021 hearing before Congress. Dr Collins, as head of the National Institutes of Health, was Dr Fauci's boss

• In an e-mail to the publisher of Nature Medicine, the journal which published the Proximal Origins paper, co-author Dr Kristian Andersen writes that Drs Collins and Fauci 'prompted' the paper

TRENDING

Chinese scientists 'create' Covid strain with 100% kill rate in mice
198.7k viewing now

Ex White House doc admits lab leak 'is NOT a conspiracy theory'...
577 viewing now

Researcher who may have made Covid still receiving $50million from US

His answers were similar to those of Dr Fauci, who sat for a marathon 14 hours of questioning last week when he finally acknowledged that the lab leak theory – that Covid escaped from a Chinese biolab – should not have been so easily dismissed.
Republicans also said that, like Dr Fauci, Dr Collins muddied the definition of gain of function research ‘in an effort to hide the NIH’s involvement in funding the dangerous research in Wuhan.'
Dr Collins served as Fauci's boss during his tenure as head of NIH from 2009 to 2021.
The sainted doctors are said to have pushed for the publication of an influential scientific paper that shaped the narrative that Covid originated in nature while discrediting the theory that gain of function was the cause.
The centerpiece of questioning pertained to the March 2020 ‘Proximal Origins’ paper, in which scientists said the theory that gain of function research triggered the release of a genetically modified coronavirus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology was ‘improbable.’
Ohio Republican Brad Wenstrup, who heads the Covid subcommittee in the House, said: ‘Dr. Collins acknowledged that Dr Fauci invited him to attend the infamous February 1, 2020 conference call that prompted the “Proximal Origin” publication.
‘This testimony directly contradicts Dr. Fauci’s previous statements and raises further concerns about the U.S. government’s role in suppressing and vilifying the lab-leak hypothesis.’
He added that Dr Collins said the lab leak hypothesis was not a conspiracy.
Dr Collins, along with Dr Fauci, sat in on a confidential conference call four years ago, ahead of the 2020 paper’s publication, which would set the tone for the public’s perception of the pandemic’s origins for years to come.
Republicans said that both used their influence that to pressure researchers to jettison the lab leak theory in favor of a natural origin one.
Drs Fauci, Collins, and other authors of the Proximal Origins paper have denied that the top doctors strongarmed the researchers into publishing one theory over another, though bombshell emails made public last spring by Republicans showed that Dr Kristian Andersen, a co-author of the paper, wrote that ‘[This paper was] Prompted by Jeremy [Farrar], Tony Fauci and Francis Collins.'

Dr Collins was said to have blurred the definition of risky gain of function research, with Dr Fauci denied having any role in funding as head of an NIH sub-agency

Dr Collins tried to silence authors of a petition criticizing blanket lockdowns in the early days of the pandemic. Those authors instead called for selectively isolating people at the highest risk of becoming severely ill
An earlier investigation completed by House Republicans uncovered an email Dr Collins sent to Dr Fauci two months after the ‘Proximal Origins’ paper was published that said: ‘I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SA RS-CoV-2 would settle this… Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy ... Anything more we can do?’
During his closed-door testimony, Dr Collins also stood firm on his previous statements denouncing the Great Barrington Declaration.
This petition criticized government efforts to shut down the economy, including schools, and favored isolating just those people at the highest risk of severe illness, such as the elderly.
Collins sent an email to Dr Fauci in October 2020 saying the ideas from ‘fringe’ epidemiologists who wrote the declaration required a ‘quick and devastating published take down.’
The widespread lockdowns that dominated most of 2020 have since been found to have inflicted harm on people’s mental health, particularly in children, who were barred from attending school in person, extracurricular activities such as sports teams, and spending much-needed time with peers.

Fauci FINALLY confesses to Covid failures ​

Dr Anthony Fauci 's second day of marathon grilling by Congress revealed that pandemic-era social distancing measures and vaccine mandates caused more harm than good.

Lockdowns also lead to coddling of our immune systems, which are typically primed to fight pathogens simply by exposure to different germs in the environment.
But without that baseline level of immunity, cases of a range of respiratory viruses, common colds, the flu, and even measles skyrocketed.
In addition to imposing lockdowns, the government endorsed ‘social distancing’ by maintaining a six-foot distance from others. But Dr Collins said, just as Dr Fauci did, that this rule was not informed by science.
Dr Collins also mimicked Dr Fauci’s murky definition of ‘gain of function’ research ‘in an effort to hide the NIH’s involvement in funding the dangerous research in Wuhan,’ according to Rep Wenstrup.
Dr Fauci was also accused of 'playing semantics' during his closed-door testimony last week, when he backtracked on earlier claims that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases never allocated government money to gain of function research.
He had insisted to Senators last summer that his former department 'has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.'
Yet, emails dated February 1, 2020, showed Fauci acknowledged that 'scientists in Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments to determine that molecular mechanisms associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak originated in Wuhan.'
A transcript of Dr Collins’ testimony is expected to be made public, though it’s unclear when.
Dr Fauci’s private line of questioning before the same committee last week ‘uncovered drastic and systemic failures in America’s public health systems.’

 

[Apollonian]

Persistent Cardiac Conduction Dysfunction: New Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Mimicking Radiation and Activation of HERVs​

Activation of HERVs induces dsRNA immune response and mitochondrial damage.​

WALTER M CHESNUT
JAN 16, 2024

Link: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/persistent-cardiac-conduction-dysfunction



Effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cardiac electrophysiology in the hamster model.
Representative ECG recording showing normal baseline rhythm (a) and arrhythmias induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection including bradycardia (b), sinus pauses (c, arrows), 2nd degree AV block (d) and 3rd degree AV block (e). Arrowheads indicate p waves. Horizontal bar: 1 sec. (B-E) Analysis of ECGs from 0 to 28 dpi typically showed a triphasic pattern of SARS-CoV-2 effects on cardiac rhythm: an acute peak within 7 dpi, recovery to, or below, baseline, and a long-term effect developing between 7 dpi and 28 dpi. Mean RR interval (normalized to D0) (B), incidence of long sinus pauses (RR>meanRR+100ms; normalized to D0) (C), and RMSSD (D) peaked at 1-3 dpi, and returned to levels close to or lower than baseline, and then gradually increased to levels significantly higher than baseline at 21 and 28 dpi. The rate of AV Block events (E) peaked early and did not return to baseline level, remaining significantly higher than baseline between 7 and 28 dpi. Red symbols denoting p-values * p<0.05; † p<0.01; ‡ p<0.0001 on the figures compare mock vs. SARS-CoV2 infected groups. P-values comparing SARS-CoV-2 data from day 0 through day 28 are available in Supplementary table 4.
A preprint was published online January 8th which supports many of the mechanisms I have proposed for Spike Protein/SARS-CoV-2 pathology. From cell remodeling to Ca2+ conduction irregularities and ROS damage mimicking radiation. Perhaps the most interesting discovery is that, in the absence of viral RNA, the presence of dsRNA induced the same arrythmias as the virus itself.
The evidence gives a clear image that Sudden Cardiac Deaths may be attributable to more than just the observed cases of fulminant myocarditis. A picture is emerging of a persistent attack on the conduction system of the heart from early on in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

ECG analysis revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in multiple types of cardiac arrhythmias linked to CCS dysfunction, including bradycardia, sinus pauses, and 2nd and 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV) block. The effects had a triphasic pattern: an early peak at 1-3 dpi, a recovery phase by 7 dpi, and arrhythmia redevelopment that persisted through 28 dpi. As early as 1 day after SARS-CoV-2 infection, marked bradycardia was observed.

Also, autonomic nervous system dysfunction.

Evidence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction was also observed. Heart rate variability analysis revealed that the root mean square of the successive RR differences (RMSSD) was significantly higher than baseline at 1 and 3 dpi and lower at 5 and 7 dpi (74.9 ± 5.7ms at 1 dpi; 60.3 ± 4.9ms at 3 dpi; 30.4±1.7ms at 5 dpi; 26.1 ± 1.4ms at 7 dpi vs. 38.1 ± 1.6ms at 0 dpi), suggesting increased parasympathetic activity followed by impaired vagal responses during the acute COVID phase.

Additionally, cardiac conduction system remodeling has been recorded.

We propose that the observed CCS remodeling and altered local crosstalk between myocytes and immune cells is responsible for impaired function.

What I object to in this study is that the authors state there is NO viral RNA present. However, they only tested for the N protein! To me, this is unconscionable.

To test whether SARS-CoV-2 was directly infecting the heart, we probed for viral nucleocapsid expression in whole heart and lung homogenates by western blot or by immunofluorescence in lung or myocardial tissue slices. Western blot showed no detectable viral nucleocapsid protein in myocardial lysates at 4 dpi, while two bands were readily detected in infected lungs. Widespread nucleocapsid expression was evident in the lung at 4 dpi but was absent in the myocardium.

I am quite certain the results of viral presence would be quite different had they troubled themselves to test for the Spike.
What I find most interesting about this paper, is that the authors proceeded to give an RNA mimetic, polyinosinicolycytidylic acid (PIC), which induced precisely the same arrhythmic events that the infected animals experienced.

Interestingly, the arrhythmia phenotype was reproduced by cardiac injection of PIC in the absence of virus, indicating that innate immune activation was sufficient to drive the response. PIC also strongly induced cytokine secretion and robust interferon signaling in hearts, human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), and engineered heart tissues, accompanied by alterations in electrical and Ca2+ handling properties. Importantly, the pulmonary and cardiac effects of COVID-19 were blunted by in vivo inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling or by a mitochondrially-targeted antioxidant.

Innate Immune Activation and Mitochondrial ROS Invoke Persistent Cardiac Conduction System Dysfunction after COVID-19
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.05.574280v1.full
This relates directly to my recent findings. Activation of Human Endogenous Retroviruses (HERVs) cause the expression of dsRNA, which the Spike Protein activates.

Endogenous sources of dsRNA
Endogenous retroviruses
(ERVs). endogenous viral elements in the genome that closely resemble and can be derived from retroviruses. These elements constitute up to 8% of the human genome.
Long interspersed nuclear elements
(LINEs). a group of retrotransposons that are not long terminal repeats. LINEs constitute ~21% of the human genome. They are transcribed into mRNA and translated into a protein that acts as a reverse transcriptase, which makes a DNA copy of the LINE RNA, which then can be integrated into the genome at a new site.

Cellular origins of dsRNA, their recognition and consequences
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969093/
There is some hope in all of this. The arrhythmic effects were blunted by the use of an mitochondrially-targeted antioxidant.
My concern is that continued expression of dsRNA will eventually degrade the CCS to such an extent that, indeed, the heart simply is unable to work. We need data. We need to study everyone. From those who have had Long COVID for years, to those who had asymptomatic infection. Also, this invokes the need to fully understand if the Spike (or any part of SARS-CoV2) is being retrotranscribed.
Thank you, as always, for your readership and support.

 

[Apollonian]

The Plot Thickens: Uncovering the CIA & Rockefeller Foundation’s Role in the 2025 Depopulation Forecast released by Deagel​

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON FEBRUARY 11, 2024

Link: https://expose-news.com/2024/02/11/...ole-in-the-2025-deagel-depopulation-forecast/

In a world where reality often seems stranger than fiction, the machinations behind global events can be an enigma wrapped in mystery.
One such intrigue revolves around Deagel.com, an obscure online entity known for its exhaustive data on military capabilities and eyebrow-raising depopulation forecasts for 2025.
We can reveal that recent findings appear to link Deagel directly to significant players on the world stage: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)/ The Pentagon, and The Rockefeller Foundation.
And current real-world data on excess deaths in the West strongly suggest Deagel’s depopulation forecast is not just an estimation but in fact, a target that is on track to be hit thanks to the deadly effects of Covid-19 vaccination.

---

The Man Behind Deagel:

We can confirm that Dr. Edwin A. Deagle Jr., who passed away on February 16th 2021, is the confirmed figurehead authorities would like you to believe is solely behind Deagel.com.

Source
Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr.
During his life, Dr Edwin served as the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense. He was also the Director of International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation, an influential global philanthropic organization.

Source
Extract from the book ‘The Future of the International Oil Market’ published by the ‘Group of Thirty’
While in 1993, Deagle was nominated by President Bill Clinton to be Under Secretary of the Air Force –

Source
But the intrigue deepens.
Declassified documents, released via Freedom of Information Act requests, reveal Deagle’s communication with the then United States Director of Central Intelligence, Stansfield Turner, hinting at a relationship with the CIA.
One document, dated 1977, intriguingly refers to an event described as “the most significant in the intelligence field since 1947.”

Source

Source
The full letter to then CIA Director Stansfield Turner from Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr., the Deputy Director for International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation

Source
The full letter to Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr., the Deputy Director for International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation from then CIA Director Stansfield Turner
The CIA has released 23 FOIA articles relating to Dr Deagle, the Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. DOD and the former director of the CIA.

Source
This strongly suggests that Deagel.com isn’t just the work of one man, but is in fact the work of a U.S. Military Industrial Complex consisting of the CIA, the U.S. Department of Defense and the shady Rockefeller Foundation. Making its apocalyptic depopulation forecasts all the more concerning.

Deagel’s Forecasts & Current Events:​

Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecasts for 2025 predict significant population declines in various countries, stirring unease given the current excess death data being recorded around the world.
Deagel.com’s [infamous] 2025 forecast was removed from their website sometime in 2020. However, thanks to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive, we are able to view the original predictions before discovered by critical thinkers.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United Kingdom would see its population decline by 77.1% by the year 2025.

Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United States would see its population decline by 68.5 % by the year 2025.

Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Germany would see its population decline by 65.1% by the year 2025.

Source
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Australia would see its population decline by 34.6% by the year 2025.

Source
While also predicting a huge decline among many other Western countries.
Source
A full list of Deagel’s original apocalyptic depopulation predictions can be viewed here.
Regrettably, the unfolding events strongly suggest that Deagel’s ominous depopulation estimates may not be merely speculative. Real-world data appear to align disconcertingly with these figures, primarily driven by the severe and deadly consequences of Covid-19 vaccination.
But the widespread distribution of these experimental vaccines, allowed under emergency use authorization, would not have been possible without the backdrop of the Covid-19 pandemic.
So the fact the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) issued a ‘COVID-19 Research’ contract in Ukraine, three months prior to the official recognition of the Covid-19 virus, raises some seriously unsettling questions.
Especially when we consider the U.S. Department of Defense is now known to be intricately connected to Deagel.com, along with the CIA and The Rockefeller Foundation.

------------------------------[END OF PART ONE; SEE BELOW FOR PART 2]----------------------​

 

[Apollonian]

-----------------------------------------------------[HERE'S PART 2 TO ABOVE]----------------------------------------------------

The U.S. DoD Factor:​

The world first started to hear about a novel coronavirus in early January 2020, with reports of an alleged new pneumonia-like illness spreading across Wuhan, China.
However, the world did not actually know of Covid-19 until February 2020, because it was not until the 11th of that month that the World Health Organization officially named the novel coronavirus disease; Covid-19.

So with this being the official truth, why does United States Government data show that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) awarded a contract on the 12th November 2019 to Labyrinth Global Health INC. for ‘COVID-19 Research’, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19?
The Government of the United States has a website called ‘USA Spending‘, an official open data source of federal spending information. According to the site as of 12th April 2021, the US Government has spent a mind-blowing $3.63 trillion “in response to COVID-19”. But that’s not the only information on Covid that can be found on the site.

Hidden within the ‘Award Search’ are details on a contract awarded by the Department of Defense to a company named ‘Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp‘, which is allegedly “a global engineering, procurement, consulting and construction company specialising in infrastructure development”.
The contract was awarded on September 20th, 2012 and is described as “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services”.
The ‘Award History’ for the contract contains a tab for ‘Sub-Awards’ detailing the recipients, action date, amount, and very brief description for 115 Sub-Award transactions. Most of the Sub-Awards are extremely mundane for things such as “laboratory equipment for Kyiv”, or “office furniture for Kyiv”.

But there is one Sub-Award that stands out among the rest, and it was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health INC for “SME Manuscript Documentation and COVID-19 Research”.
An award for Covid-19 research isn’t exactly shocking when the world is allegedly in the grip of a Covid-19 pandemic, but considering the fact the sub-contract was awarded on 12th November 2019, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19, the award for Covid-19 research should come as a shock to everyone.
Source
But the shock doesn’t end there, because the place the contact for Covid-19 research was instructed to take place was Ukraine, the very country that the U.S. Military Industrial Complex is currently using to fight a proxy war against Russia.

The Rockefeller Factor:​

While Dr. Deagle’s links to the Rockefeller Foundation, CIA, and DoD provide a gripping backstory, the Rockefeller Foundation’s role adds a layer of complexity.
A powerful entity since 1913, its alleged mission to “promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world” has shaped global health policies and led to a significant influence in the creation of the World Health Organization (WHO).
But this influence hasn’t been without controversy.
The Rockefeller Foundation’s historical entanglement with population control and eugenic programs remains a contentious chapter in its legacy. Its support for these initiatives during the early 20th century presents a disconcerting portrait of the Foundation’s role in manipulating human demographics.
Eugenics, a field now widely discredited and dismissed as pseudoscience, aimed to improve the genetic composition of the human race through selective breeding. The Rockefeller Foundation’s monetary and ideological support for these programs indicates an ethically questionable engagement in directing human evolution and societal composition.
The population control initiatives, framed as efforts to manage global population growth for sustainable development and resource conservation, also bore the Foundation’s signature. Critics argue that such activities echoed an overreach, hinting at an assumed authority to control the demographics of global populations.
Although the Foundation has since publicly disavowed such measures and appears to have redirected its focus towards universally accepted areas of public health, education, and the arts, the echo of its past actions remains.
The Rockefeller Foundation’s past involvements offer invaluable lessons about the potential consequences of unchecked influence and a poignant insight into the organization’s considerable sway over global human affairs. Despite the change in focus and approach in recent years, the effects of past endeavours underscore the caution we must exercise when philanthropic entities wield influence on a global scale.

Deagel’s Depopulation Forecasts are a Target​

The revelations linking Deagel to Dr. Edwin A. Deagle Jr., the CIA, DoD, and The Rockefeller Foundation, paint a compelling, if disconcerting, narrative.
These high-profile connections suggest a level of influence that raises questions about the motivations behind Deagel’s apocalyptic population forecasts.
Especially when we consider the fact real-world data currently aligns with Deagel’s 2025 predictions.
Official reports from multiple Governments across the globe have sounded the alarm bells by documenting an unprecedented number of excess deaths since the widespread administration of Covid-19 injections.
Official figures provided to EuroMOMO by the UK Government and 26 other Governments of counties across Europe reveal that most of the continent suffered 375,253 excess deaths in 2021 and 404,6000 excess deaths in 2022.
This equates to 779,853 excess deaths over the two years. The figures do not include Ukraine so cannot be blamed on the ongoing war.
Source Data
Australia suffered 11,068 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 22,730 excess deaths by week 38 of 2022. This is in stark contrast to 2020, when only 1,306 excess deaths were recorded at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.
This means Australia suffered a shocking 1,640% increase in excess deaths in just 39 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

New Zealand suffered 2,169 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 5,286 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022. These are shocking figures for the small island with an estimated population of 5 million people.
Especially when compared to 2020, when no excess deaths were suffered and 160 fewer deaths were actually recorded than expected at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.
This means New Zealand suffered a shocking 3,404% increase in excess deaths in 49 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

In Canada, the situation is similarly concerning.
The country suffered 35,318 excess deaths in 2021 and then 25,333 excess deaths by week 34 of 2022. This compares to 31,042 excess deaths in 2020 by week 53.
However, when looking at the figures up to week 34 in both 2020 and 2021, it becomes clear that 2022 has in fact been the worst year for excess deaths by far.
By week 34 of 2020, Canada had recorded 17,888 excess deaths. By week 34 of 2021, Canada had recorded 18,498 excess deaths. But by week 34 of 2022, Canada had recorded 25,333 excess deaths, representing a 42% increase on the excess deaths recorded in 2020, prior to the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
This dramatic increase in excess deaths raises serious questions about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines and whether they may have been a contributing factor to the increase in excess deaths.

The USA suffered 674,954 excess deaths in 2021, and then 434,520 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022. This equates to over 1.1 million excess deaths in nearly two years.
The USA suffered a staggering 674,954 excess deaths in 2021, a year that saw the country coerced into coming forward to get injected multiple times throughout the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccines. These numbers represent a significant increase in deaths compared to previous years and have raised alarm bells among the public and healthcare professionals alike.
The situation did not improve in 2022, with 434,520 excess deaths recorded by week 49, bringing the total number of excess deaths to over 1.1 million in nearly two years.
This is a staggering number and has led to questions about the effectiveness of the vaccine and the government’s response to the alleged pandemic.

The official narrative put forth by governments and health organizations has been that deaths in 2020 increased due to the outbreak of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic, with the response to it adversely affecting millions of people worldwide.
However, as the pandemic progressed and a vaccine was developed and distributed, the narrative shifted to focus on the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection as a means to curb the spread of the virus and reduce the number of deaths.
This narrative was reinforced through various propaganda campaigns, public statements, and official statements, with the message that the vaccine was “safe and effective” and would be “the key to ending the pandemic”.
However, the figures and official reports released by governments in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and most of Europe have shown that the opposite has happened, with millions of excess deaths being recorded since the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
This has led to many questions about the safety of the vaccine, the facts of the official narrative, and the integrity of Governments and Public Health bodies around the world.
The figures have been provided to both the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and EuroMOMO by each country’s Government organisations. The U.S. data has been provided by the Centers for Disease Control. The UK data has been provided by the Office for National Statistics. And Australia’s data has been provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
So these aren’t independent estimates. They are official Government-authorized figures.

And they show that the ‘Five Eyes’ countries and 26 other countries across Europe suffered 1.99 million excess deaths up to week 34/49 of 2022 following the Emergency Use Authorization of the Covid-19 injections.
These figures cast a haunting shadow over the narrative surrounding the pandemic and raise concerns about the true impact of vaccination efforts. Especially when coupled with mortality rates per 100,000.

Mortality Rates per 100k are Lowest among the Unvaccinated​

Official figures published by the UK Government suggest that Covid-19 vaccines may have been the biggest contributing factor to the millions of excess deaths seen across the ‘Five Eyes’ and most of Europe.
The figures can be found in a report titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.
Table 2 of the report contains the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for deaths per 100,000 person-years in England up to May 2022.
We took the figures provided by the ONS for January to May 2022 and produced the following charts which reveal the horrific consequences of the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaign.
The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 40 to 49-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –

In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 40 to 49-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 40 to 49–year-olds.
The worst month for mortality rates among the partly and double vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated was February. This month saw partly vaccinated 40-49-year-olds 264% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds.
Whilst double-vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 61% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds.
By May 2022, five months after the mass Booster campaign, triple vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 40% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 81.8 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of 58.4 among the unvaccinated.
It’s the same old story in every single age group as you can see from the following two charts –
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
A full breakdown of the figures by all age groups can be viewed here.

Covert Operations?​

As we venture deeper into this unfolding enigma, we confront a trifecta of powerful entities – the CIA, DoD, and The Rockefeller Foundation – whose past actions and present influence cast a long shadow over our global narrative.
When these entities emerge from behind the veil of Deagel.com, what might initially have been dismissed as wild conjecture now calls for sober consideration.
The evidence that suggests the DoD, intimately tied to Deagel.com, may have had an anticipatory hand in COVID-19 research months before the virus’s official recognition is, at the very least, curious.
This odd timing coupled with the DoD’s expansive reach on matters of global security prompts us to question the broader implications and the role they may have played in the unfolding pandemic.
The Rockefeller Foundation, another significant force behind Deagel.com, has a historical track record of involvement in population control programs. While these endeavours are allegedly relegated to the past, their implications continue to resonate, particularly when paired with Deagel’s disturbing population forecasts for 2025.
Similarly, the CIA, notorious for its covert operations and functioning often as a law unto itself, stands as a powerful and enigmatic piece of this intricate puzzle. Its involvement with Deagel and its shared links with Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr., and by extension, the DoD and The Rockefeller Foundation, adds another layer of intrigue to this narrative.
These pieces of evidence and connections warrant vigilant scrutiny of the actors operating behind the curtain of global affairs. As we dissect the intricate web of relations between these entities and their associations with Deagel’s dire depopulation forecasts, we’re reminded of the potential influence they wield over our shared future.
In our quest to understand the truth, the lines between factual happenings, covert operations, and speculation become increasingly critical, yet convoluted. But it’s in this very complexity that the urgency of our vigilance and understanding is underscored. For in the balance hangs our ability to navigate the future, informed, aware, and with eyes wide open.

 

[Apollonian]

Opposition to mRNA injections now considered a CRIME in France, violators face 45,000 euro fine and 3 years in prison for questioning “the science”

02/18/2024 // Ethan Huff

Link: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-18-opposition-mrna-crime-france-prison-fines.html/

The French government just passed a law to fine and imprison people for refusing to get injected with mRNA (modRNA) "vaccines."

All opposition to mRNA-LNP (lipid nanoparticles) injections in France is now considered to be "sectarian aberration." Violations carry with them a penalty of 45,000 euros and up to three years imprisonment.

"It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state," tweeted Dr. Kat Lindley. "Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment."

Known as Article 4, the highly illiberal law prohibits residents and citizens from saying anything bad about "therapeutic" treatments like mRNA shots that are either mandatory or just recommended by the French government.

"Already, renowned doctors are being targeted, whom this article will silence," said a French X account called Annie Arnaud. "France is taking a totalitarian run. Macron and his henchmen are followers of the WEF (World Economic Forum) and globalist policies."

"It is a catastrophe for the country where a majority of citizens no longer obey vaccine propaganda. Social unrest ahead."

(Related: Did you know that mRNA injections cause cancer?)

Medical fascism on the rise​

Some accounts are saying that Article 4 was proposed but not actually passed, so it remains to be seen if any enforcement comes about because of this alleged ruling. Even so, the fact that there are politicians out there who believe in this type of medical fascism is concerning in and of itself.

"It's nonetheless a very important warning to everybody about how extreme fascist members of the WEF and other globalists try to push their insanely sick ideas through everywhere, in all free countries," one account wrote.

"That's also the reason for the current mix of mass murder of the old freedom keeping cultures, the individuals holding these cultures of freedom, mass murder via poisons and in every other way, and combined with the replacement by totalitarian immigrants that is taking place, and combined with floating extreme fascist legislation everywhere. This massive push started with the extreme covid measures. They weren't temporary, they were meant to be fully implemented from that moment on and forward. That's also why the "emergency measures" have been kept for years after any "emergency" – in order to condition populations to extreme fascist measures."

Another person wrote that it is critical for We the People, no matter in which country we live, to speak up and speak out against this type of thing. Not only that, but naming and calling out each and every medical fascist in government who promotes this kind of thing will likewise deter government abuses of power.

Another account wrote that Article 4 actually was adopted "in a 2nd vote," which means France is now a medical dictatorship where residents and citizens have to take the prescribed "medicine" the government gives them – and do it with an approving smile.

Meanwhile, France is accusing Russia of fomenting a disinformation campaign concerning its government in this key election year.

The nation's authorities say Russia has been running a longstanding online manipulation campaign against Western backers of Ukraine, which of course include France.

France's foreign ministry issued a statement about how 'no manipulation attempt will distract France from its support for Ukraine in the face of Russia's war of aggression."

If the vaccine industry has to force people to take its products behind the barrel of a gun in order for them to sell and make Big Pharma, it is probably time to reevaluate what it means to provide "health care" and probably stop using that term altogether. Learn more at BadMedicine.news.

Sources for this article include:

Twitter.com

NaturalNews.com

APNews.com

 

[Apollonian]

PRE-PLANNED: Weeks before COVID was even announced, Moderna shipped mRNA “vaccine” prototypes to UNC scientists for evaluation​

by tts-admin | Feb 27, 2024

Ethan Huff – Natural News Feb 26, 2024​

Link: https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=282520/


Man found dead on a street in Wuhan, China, at the start of the ‘pandemic’
Before the world had even heard of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), Prof. Ralph Baric, PhD, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) knew about it, having received prototype mRNA (modRNA) “vaccines” from none other than Moderna.
Newly unearthed documents that were supposed to remain confidential show that Cambridge, Mass.-based Moderna sent the prototype vials to UNC several weeks before COVID was announced to the world. Baric signed the material transfer agreement for them on Dec. 12, 2019, followed by a signature from Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at UNC, on Dec. 16, 2019.
Two representatives from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the federal agency that was then headed up by Tony Fauci under the umbrella of the then-Francis Collins-led National Institutes of Health (NIH), also signed the agreement. One was Amy F. Petrik, PhD, a technology transfer specialist, and the other was Barney Graham, MD, PhD, an investigator.
On Dec. 17, 2019, the final signatories of the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s deputy general counsel.
“All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus,” notes The Exposé (United Kingdom).
“It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point, they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of ‘unknown cause.'”
(Related: Did you know that Moderna’s marketing arm colluded with U.S. law enforcement to spy on Americans and shut down public vaccine skepticism?)

COVID criminals in action​

It would take several weeks after all these people signed Moderna’s material transfer agreement that the WHO would officially dub the unknown outbreak a “novel coronavirus,” though Moderna somehow knew weeks in advance that it needed to release a “vaccine” for it – and Moderna somehow already had the “vaccine” fully developed.
Keep in mind that in 2019 when all of this criminality took place between Moderna and UNC, there were no coronaviruses in known existence that posed a threat to humanity as was later claimed in early 2020. Truth be told, there is still no evidence that a real coronavirus ever posed a threat to humanity in 2020 or 2021, either.
The “testing” was a sham, as were the “vaccines.” Faulty PCR tests were abnormally and inappropriately tuned to a high cycle rate, which created the illusion of a coronavirus crisis – but still to this day, SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated using Koch’s postulates, meaning it has never been proven to exist in the first place.
“Considering the fact a faulty PCR test has been used at a high cycle rate, hospitals have been empty in comparison to previous years, statistics show just 0.2% of those allegedly infected have died within 28 days of an alleged positive test result, the majority of those deaths by a mile have been people over the age of 85, and a mass of those deaths were caused by a drug called midazolam, which causes respiratory depression, and respiratory arrest,” The Exposé further explains about the situation.
“Perhaps Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases would like to explain themselves in a court of law?”
In the comments, someone else noted that as more and more of this damning information comes to light, the COVID house of cards continues to fall.
“There’s no way to stop it anymore,” this same individual added about the inevitable.
More of the latest news about Big Pharma corruption can be found at BadMedicine.news.

Sources for this article include:
Expose-News.com
NaturalNews.com

Source