Wash. criminals, left-coast scum traitors, globalist-satanists, Demon-rats, gun-grabbers working for ZOG oppression, tyranny, genocide, etc.

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Firearms trainer rips liberal state’s strict gun bill: ‘discriminating against women'​

Link: http://www.mr-mehra.com/2023/05/firearms-trainer-rips-liberal-states.html

11 HRS AGO
3 MINUTE READ

As gun ownership spikes among women, strict new law outlaws popular AR-15 style rifles​

UNIVERSITY PLACE, Wash. – A firearms instructor slammed Washington state's new "assault weapons" ban as discriminatory against women because it outlaws one of the most popular rifle models: the AR-15.
"For a lot of women, it's taken away the personal protection option of choice that works best for them," Jane Milhans of the Washington State Rifle and Pistol Association told Fox News. "So the law is clearly discriminating against women."
Woman learns to shoot AR-15 at outdoor rifle range

A woman learns to shoot an AR-15 at the Tacoma Rifle and Revolver Club in University Place, Washington. (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)
WASHINGTON GOV SIGNS BIG GUN CONTROL PACKAGE, INCLUDING 'ASSAULT WEAPONS' BAN: 'NO ONE NEEDS AN AR-15'
Gov. Jay Inslee signed a package of gun control bills into law last month, including House Bill 1240. The law immediately banned the manufacture, sale and import of dozens of semiautomatic rifle models in Washington with the goal of preventing mass shootings.
"No one needs an AR-15 to protect your family," Inslee said before signing the bill into law. "You only need it to kill other families."
Milhans disagreed, arguing that AR-15 style guns are the most popular rifles among women because of their female-friendly features like a stock that can be adjusted to fit smaller frames. They also have less recoil than many other rifles or shotguns.
"So it makes it safer for a woman, both in a home defense situation or if they're shooting on a rifle league or something like that," she said.
Women are one of the fastest-growing groups of gun owners. And while handguns are the most popular firearm, rifles are a close second, according to the Pew Research Center. More than 60% of gun owners surveyed said they had a rifle, and AR-15s consistently lead the category in sales.

IRS HAS SPENT $10 MILLION ON ‘WEAPONRY AND GEAR’ SINCE START OF CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC, REPORT SAYS
"What does AR-15 stand for?" Milhans asked her all-female firearms class near Tacoma, a question she poses to all new students.
The narrative around semiautomatic guns is full of "misconceptions," students in Milhans' class told Fox News.
"Everything in the news and media is making it sound like this is the most murderous weapon out there and this is what everyone's getting to kill our kids in school systems," said Jessica McCoy, who said she felt nervous around guns prior to the training session.
"These are not big, scary, automatic guns that are being banned in our state," Lisa Olson said. "The AR-15 is a semi-automatic. You could only send one bullet through at a time, and the public thinks otherwise it seems like."

FIREARMS TRAINER RIPS GUN BILL, ‘DISCRIMINATING AGAINST WOMEN’:Video​

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE
Milhans said Washington's new gun laws target the wrong people.
"They're targeting us, the law-abiding firearm owners, instead of the criminals," she said. "Criminals will buy their rifles through black market drug deals, straw purchase, whatever illegal means. And so the law won't impact them."
"They're just continuing to disarm us," she said. "They want to take control. They're not educating the public accurately on what they are doing, and slowly they're taking away our rights."
Banning so-called "assault weapons" appears popular with American voters, though: A recent Fox News Poll found six in 10 favor banning "assault rifles" and semiautomatic weapons.
At the same time, only 43% of registered voters polled believe stricter gun laws will make the country safer, a nearly 10% decrease from 2016. The shift comes primarily from women, Republicans and independents.
Fox News Poll gun laws

Fox News poll on stricter gun laws. (Fox News
Washington's HB 1240 is already facing numerous lawsuits, including from the NRA's lobbying arm, the Silent Majority Foundation, the Second Amendment Foundation and a coalition of gun stores, a firearms manufacturer and a former Olympic rifle shooting competitor.
Attorney General Bob Ferguson wrote that his office is "undefeated in court against the gun lobby" and plans "to keep that record intact." Ferguson announced his campaign for governor earlier this month.
 
Last edited:

5 Things the Left Does NOT Want You to Know About the 2nd Amendment​

Link: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...not-want-you-to-know-about-the-2nd-amendment/

[see vid at site link, above]

THE FOUR BOXES DINER™ (SPONSORED)18 May 2023798
3:51
The following content is sponsored by The Four Boxes Diner.

Anti-gun zealots say a lot of dumb things about the Second Amendment.
That’s one reason why Mark W. Smith’s Second Amendment YouTube channel The Four Boxes Diner™ has become so popular.
With over 15 million views, his videos provide YOU with the information needed to debunk the left’s myths about our fundamental right to bear arms.


Here are five important truths gun grabbers DON’T want you to know.

1. Our Founders fought the American Revolution to resist gun control.

This is a story you probably never learned in school, but Smith gives you the full history that the left doesn’t want you to know about. WATCH HERE to find out. [ck site link, above, top]

2. The Founders were familiar with — and REJECTED — the “public safety” arguments of today’s anti-gunners.

Do you know the famous saying, “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns”?
It doesn’t come from the NRA. No, as Smith shows you, this bit of wisdom comes from a surprising source who was a huge influence on America’s Founders and who explained why banning guns was dangerous and futile.

3. The Founders put the right to keep and bear arms in the Bill of Rights to help thwart tyranny in all forms.
The Founders didn’t just ensure that Americans’ pre-existing right to bear arms was protected by the Second Amendment. They sometimes required the bearing of private arms, Smith reveals.
Let me repeat that: the Founders sometimes required the bearing of private arms by U.S. citizens.
The Founders saw armed preparedness as essential to defending liberty. There is even MORE to this story at The Four Boxes Diner™ Second Amendment YouTube Channel.

4. The anti-gun left does believe in armed self-defense — but for them, not you.
Sometimes gun grabbers say, “You don’t need a gun. Leave weapons in the hands of trained professionals like the police. They’ll protect you.”
But it’s not true. Cops can’t possibly be on the scene for most violent crimes.
Even The New York Times has admitted it. Last year the Times reported that in the vast majority of “active shooter” incidents, the police show up after the shooting ends. “The fact is, you can’t rely on the police to protect you,” Mark W. Smith says. “You are your own first responder.
Rich and powerful anti-gun crusaders know this. Take those Hollywood celebrities who speak out for gun control — but have armed bodyguards! Or the anti-gun politicians who do the same.

5. No matter what the anti-gunners say, the Second Amendment doesn’t just protect muskets. It protects modern firearms too.
Gun grabbers like to say that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect modern weapons that the Founders never could have envisioned.
Smith gives you the FACTS to refute this bogus claim.
For example, the Founders knew that firearms technology was advancing quickly beyond pouring gun powder down the muzzle of a musket. The Girandoni air rifle, which held over 20 rounds of ammo, was invented a decade before the Bill of Rights.
As the Supreme Court has made crystal clear, anti-gunners can’t ban firearms that are in common use. That includes the “weapons of war” the left rants about — which is their scary name for ordinary semiautomatic firearms that civilians have owned and used for decades.
“You lawfully inherited the right to keep and bear arms — a right Americans fought and died for,” Mark Smith reminds you. “Don’t let someone talk you out of it.”
If you care about defending your right to bear arms, SUBSCRIBE to The Four Boxes Diner™ Second Amendment channel, and join those Americans who have watched (and learned from) Mark W. Smith’s videos (viewed over 15 million times).
 

Michigan Governor Signs Red Flag Legislation Despite the Fact It May Not Be Enforced​

Link: https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amend...islation-despite-fact-it-may-not-be-enforced/


35
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signs legislation, Monday, May 22, 2023, in Royal Oak, Mich. The package of legislation being signed will create extreme risk protection orders, which authorize family, police officers, or medical professionals to seek a court order to temporarily keep guns out of the hands of someone who …
Carlos Osorio/AP

AWR HAWKINS23 May 2023

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) signed red flag legislation into law Monday despite ongoing questions about whether it will enforced or, if enforced, how such enforcement would occur.
The Associated Press reported, “Over half of the state’s counties have passed resolutions declaring themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries,” and through those resolutions have made clear there will be no enforcement of laws that infringe on Second Amendment rights.
Additionally, a number of local sheriffs told the AP “that they won’t enforce the law if they don’t believe it’s constitutional.”
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) made clear that she intends the law to be enforced whether sheriffs agree or not: “For those who are in law enforcement who refuse to enforce these important orders, let me say this loudly and clearly: I will make certain that I find someone with jurisdiction who will enforce these orders.”
The Michigan red flag law allows guns to be seized from an individual for a period of one year.
Breitbart News noted that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) signed a red flag law for his state on Friday, despite that fact that such a law has failed to end mass shootings in California and Colorado.
 

Rasmussen Reports Survey: Majority of Americans Agree Media Favors Democrats and is “Truly the Enemy of the People”​

MAY 25, 20231

Link: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2023/05/rasmussen-reports-survey-majority-of.html

US-media.jpg

A new Rasmussen Reports survey reveals that a majority of Americans believe the media favors Democrats and is “truly the enemy of the people.” The survey was conducted May 16-18, 2023 from 1,002 U.S. likely voters.
The survey questions included:
1* Do you trust the political news you are getting?
2* Does news media coverage of politics generally tend to favor Democrats or Republicans? Or is political coverage in the news media mostly neutral and balanced?
3* Do you agree or disagree with this statement: The media are “truly the enemy of the people”?
The survey reveals 30% of likely voters say they trust the political news they are getting while 52% say they do not trust political news.

“A mind-blowing damnation of the regime press”
Democrat trust in their political news drops 11 points, but @joebiden strong approvers still absolutely trust the news they’re getting.
Full video:https://t.co/52oFzi4hM3 pic.twitter.com/0QANVfKyfC
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) May 23, 2023

Voters also say that the news favors Democrats over Republicans by a 32% margin.
Voters tell us the news favors Democrats over Republicans BY A 32% MARGIN.
Among independents, it is 36%.
That’s pretty overt. https://t.co/w0nI8E2Hci pic.twitter.com/4ATJd9JAKb
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) May 23, 2023

The survey also reveals that 59% of American voters view the media as truly the enemy of the people.
Enemy of The People: Today we reported a new record high (59%) of American voters who view the media as enemies.
And as if preordained, the exchange below with @KariLake took place in Arizona to help commemorate the new milestone – https://t.co/g1h3JPH47N pic.twitter.com/lMN1OdQIcG
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) May 24, 2023
 

War-Hungry Democrat Senators Vow To Shut Down US Gov. If We Don’t Send Billions More To Ukraine​

by Kelen McBreen
October 5th 2023, 4:57 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/war-...gov-if-we-dont-send-billions-more-to-ukraine/

[vid at site link, above]

America Last leftists will shut the country down if Ukraine can't have money to murder civilians in Donbas

Several Democrat politicians have come forward vowing to hold the nation hostage by shutting down the U.S. government if Congress doesn’t pledge to send more tax money to the corrupt Western puppet Zelensky who is running Ukraine into the ground.

Democrat Senators Michael Bennet of Colorado and Cory Booker of New Jersey both hit the mainstream media circuit to scare Americans by claiming they’ll shut the entire government down if they don’t get more funding for Ukraine.

Bennet said he hopes it doesn’t come to that, but that he will “certainly be willing to shut the government down” if the GOP refuses to include Ukraine funding in the government funding bill.

NEW: @SenatorBennet (D-Colo.) says he’d “certainly be willing” to force a shutdown if Ukraine aid is not included in the government funding bill.

Bennet: “If that’s what’s going to be necessary to make sure that we get people’s attention on this.” pic.twitter.com/WQiGDbedsO
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) October 4, 2023

Booker likewise explained, “We’re going to do whatever we have to do to fight to make sure Ukraine funding happens,” which would include shutting down the U.S. government.

https://www.givesendgo.com/savealex

The Democratic Party is showing it is being held hostage by the corrupt Zelensky regime that demands more U.S. tax money be wasted on the nation’s repeated failed offensives.

The majority of Americans don’t want more spending to go toward the Ukraine war, and if the government shuts down, they might also learn just how useless politicians and government agencies have become.
 
Last edited:

Gun Sales Spike 200% in Maine After Tragic Mass Shooting​

By Anthony Scott Oct. 29, 2023 1:40 pm

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-200-maine-after-tragic-mass/?utm_source=rss/

image_6487327-38-600x397.jpeg

Gun sales in Lewiston, Maine and the surrounding area spiked over 200% after a deadly mass shooting claimed the lives of 18 people and wounded over a dozen more.
Despite a shelter-in-place order being put in place in Lewiston, Maine, local gun shop owners were urged to open up their doors by community members who pleaded with them to open up shop.
According to Fox Business, Ryan Gagnon, who is a co-owner of 3 Cousins Firearms in Lewiston, reported, “Our sales were up, I would say, over 200% compared to a typical Friday.”

Another gun shop owner, Tony Lewis, shared that he did more business after the mass shooting than he did the entire month.
7 Reasons to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Premium Beef Right Away
Lewis then explained the reason why residents of Maine were flocking to buy guns and it was because “People are scared.. So they want to make sure they can protect themselves.”

Per Fox Business:
Gun sales in the Lewiston, Maine, area spiked as much as 200% after Wednesday’s mass shooting that claimed at least 18 lives and injured 13 more, one store owner said.
“We were swamped yesterday,” Ryan Gagnon, co-owner of 3 Cousins Firearms in Lewiston and a Navy veteran, told Fox News Digital Saturday morning. “Our sales were up, I would say, over 200% compared to a typical Friday.”
They didn’t plan to open their store because of the shelter-in-place order that turned the city into a ghost town reminiscent of the COVID shutdowns. But Gagnon, whose shop about half a mile from one of the crime scenes, said they received so many messages and Facebook messages that they felt like they had to open the shop.
Pew Research reported in 2022 that 47% of residents in Maine are gun owners.
Residents in Lewiston, Maine and in the area nearby were able to breathe a sigh of relief after authorities found accused mass shooter Robert Card dead in a trailer parked in a Recycling Center’s overflow parking lot.

READ: [ck site link, above, top]
 
Mark Dice comments on "Tampon Tim," who put Tampons in boys restrooms in schools, "red-flag" laws, etc., now running w. Kamel-face

 

Kamala Harris’ VP Pick Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz Faces Backlash For Praising Chinese Communism​

Link: https://independencejournal.com/kam...aces-backlash-for-praising-chinese-communism/

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate in the 2024 election, is under fire for remarks he made in the 1990s praising Chinese communism while teaching in Nebraska. In a 1991 article from the Alliance Times-Herald,
Walz is quoted telling his students that under Chinese communism, “everyone is the same” and the government ensures citizens receive food and housing equally.

Walz’s comments included praising the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) system as one where “everyone shares,” describing it as a model of equality.

However, he failed to acknowledge the brutal enforcement of China’s one-child policy, mischaracterizing it as merely a tax rather than addressing the forced abortions and sterilizations that were widespread under the regime.

As Walz faces a House Oversight Committee investigation into his ties with Chinese officials, his past remarks are drawing increased attention. Critics argue that his favorable view of the CCP’s policies casts doubt on his judgment and suitability for national office.

The resurfacing of these comments is expected to add fuel to conservative criticism of the Harris-Walz ticket, particularly concerning their stance on international human rights and relations with authoritarian regimes.
 

Kamala Begins Making Excuses For Why She Picked Tim Walz As Her Running Mate​

October 1, 2024

Link: https://www.lifezette.com/2024/10/k...-as-her-running-mate/?utm_source=daily-email/

[see vids at site link, above]

Kamala Harris recently revealed that she suffered from insomnia after Joe Biden endorsed her as his successor and that she was sleep-deprived when she chose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate.

2024.08.10-09.37-rvmnews-66b734c27a35f-1024x576.jpg


Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz take the stage during a campaign rally at the Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale on Aug. 9, 2024.
In an interview on the podcast “All The Smoke,” hosted by former NBA players Matt Barnes and Stephen Jackson, Harris discussed her decision-making process leading up to her selection of Walz.
Harris, 59, said that after Biden informed her he would not be running for re-election, she faced a whirlwind of activity that left her struggling to sleep. “From the time that the president called me and told me he wasn’t running, I mean, it’s just like everything was in speedy, speedy motion, and I was not sleeping so well,” Harris said during the interview.

MORE NEWS: Behind the Scenes: RNC’s Strategy for Election Integrity This Year

She described waking up early one morning in Washington, D.C., with only a few hours of sleep, feeling the need to cook to calm her nerves. “And that one morning I just, I mean, I had, I don’t know, a few hours’ sleep — and I, you know, I like to sleep. I just got up. I was like — so I just went out and got a pork roast and started marinating it,” Harris shared.
Has Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris swayed your vote?

Her family was in town at the time, and while they were still asleep, she began cooking to relax her mind.
The Democratic nominee, currently neck-and-neck with former President Donald Trump in national and swing-state polls ahead of the November 5 election, said she made the “gut” decision to pick Walz, despite the lack of rest the night before.
Harris’ affinity for cooking has been a recurring theme during her campaign, as she has attempted to use it as a way to connect with voters.
Recently, she visited a spice shop in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, while preparing for her debate against Trump on September 10.

MORE NEWS: Feminists Offended by Vance: ‘Mansplaining’ Accusations Fall Flat on X [WATCH]

In the same interview, Harris also discussed how she manages stress, mentioning her routine of morning exercise followed by prayer. “A prayer that comes in after that every day,” she said.

Harris also emphasized the importance of not getting bogged down by online criticism, offering a piece of advice: “Number one rule, don’t read the comments.”
The revelation about her insomnia and decision-making process has sparked conversation, especially considering the significance of selecting a vice-presidential running mate.

MORE NEWS: CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Gets Schooled by Trump Jr. After VP Debate [WATCH]

However, some critics have raised concerns over how Harris’s decision-making could be affected by stress and lack of sleep.
In contrast to Harris’s lighthearted account of choosing her running mate, her opponents have questioned the wisdom of her decision-making process.
Critics argue that sleep deprivation could affect critical decisions, especially in high-stakes roles such as the presidency.
The race between Harris and Trump remains tight, and these types of revelations may play a role in shaping public opinion as Election Day approaches.
 

One Brave Man Risked Kamala Harris’s Wrath to Expose Her Anti-Gun Obsession​

October 16, 2024
By: Gina Morelli

Link: https://gunpowdermagazine.com/one-b...rriss-wrath-to-expose-her-anti-gun-obsession/

No one knows Kamala Harris’s scandalous history better than this man.
He took action to expose her obsession with banning guns.
And in doing so he risked drawing her wrath on himself.
Kamala Harris is trying to portray herself as a moderate during this presidential election, but it is the first time in her political career that she has ever tried to do that.
Up until she became the nominee, Harris spent her entire career trying to build a brand for herself as a fearless progressive who would push left-wing policies and attack the right.
This meant taking extreme positions on everything from social issues to economics to guns in order to endear herself to the most extreme elements of the Democrat base.
Now she is trying to erase all of that history in order to appeal to swing voters in America, but one man from California remembers everything that she has done in her career.
Chuck Michel is an attorney with a long history in California politics who has litigated on behalf of gun owners, and he knows just how bad Harris’s history is with the Second Amendment.
Here is what Michel had to say, according to Fox News: “Kamala Harris never met a gun control law that she didn’t like. She supported everything that the extreme progressive San Francisco City Council ever proposed. She tried to limit concealed carry by intervening in a court case to block a Ninth Circuit win. She obviously supported Prop H. And she supported the D.C. handgun ban with an amicus brief in the Heller case that she took the lead on. And she certified microstamping.”
Michel’s warning should be heeded by anyone who owns a gun and is considering supporting Kamala Harris for president.
There are many voters who may lean left on a number of issues, but still choose to own guns for the protection of their family.
These voters many not realize just how extreme her history is on this issue, but that’s why Michel is here to tell them.
The Fox News article continues, “However, throughout Harris’ long career, including stints as San Francisco district attorney and California attorney general, she repeatedly voiced support for banning or restricting citizens from legally possessing handguns. She also argued at the federal level that banning handguns does not violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment rights.
“As San Francisco’s district attorney, Harris sponsored a 2005 ballot measure known as Proposition H that sought to ban the manufacture, sale or possession of pistols by San Franciscans unless they are a member of law enforcement, in the military or work in private security.”
Harris should simply state clearly how she is going to govern on the Second Amendment if she is elected to the White House.
If her views have changed and she is no longer hostile to guns, she can say that, but she is going to have to give specifics.
Because if she does not, then people will be justified in assuming that Chuck Michel is right, and she is an anti-gun extremist.
 
Back
Top