U knew it--nigga DA of Fulton county, Ga., Fani, who indicted Trump, caught now in huge election-fraud and money laundering (RICO) scam, suckers

[Apollonian]

Explosive Revelation: Fani Willis Linked To Massive Election Fraud And Money Laundering RICO Enterprise!​

By Guest Contributor Sep. 3, 2023 7:30 am
Guest post by Chris Gleason

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...on-fani-willis-linked-massive-election-fraud/

In a shocking turn of events, a bombshell investigation has uncovered jaw-dropping connections between Fani Willis and a sprawling web of election fraud and money laundering activities.
Fani Willis’s involvement will be sure to send shockwaves through the political landscape.

The investigation, which spans across multiple states and multiple jurisdictions, has revealed a complex network of illicit operations aimed at undermining the very foundation of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law. Sources close to the matter suggest that Willis was a massive beneficiary in the Federal and Georgia RICO enterprises. It appears that she is currently playing a key role in orchestrating a systematic scheme to manipulate election outcomes, casting doubt on the integrity of the entire electoral process.

In the lead up to the 2022 midterm elections, my team uncovered a massive money laundering network of campaign finance contributions being made via ActBlue. One of the top beneficiaries of this money laundering RICO enterprise was none other than Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock. The Gateway Pundit was the first news organization to cover the massive money laundering network that financed the Raphael Warnock campaign.
As The BRICS Countries Stockpile Gold And Americans Scramble to Protect Themselves, A Faith-Based Company Shows Them How
As our investigation progressed, we expanded our efforts into other states such as Missouri, Maryland, Wisconsin, Arizona, and then into every single state.
Working with the Epoch Times investigative journalist Steven Kovac, we made a stunning find. Many of the top ActBlue “Contributors” never made the individual contributions. Many of these “Not Employed Individual Contributors” were the victims of a highly sophisticated money laundering scheme.

The scheme was further exposed when I provided the data to James O’Keefe and his people at O’Keefe Media Group who captured many unwitting “Money Laundering Smurfs” in Maryland.
This massive ongoing money laundering operation involves wire fraud, evasion of campaign finance limits, structuring of financial transactions, tax fraud, non profit fraud, identity theft, and elder abuse.
The RICO operation is still in operation today. Using the identities of unwitting elderly, and other democrat voters, this massive RICO money laundering enterprise is the fuel for the entire election fraud RICO operation.

BUYING A DISTRICT ATTORNEY
The criminal money laundering enterprise operates at the Federal, state and local levels. The first local elected official identified as part of this ongoing money laundering operation was Alvin Bragg.

Alvin Bragg received massive numbers of campaign finance contributions from the network of individuals who had been identified as smurfs. The investigation into Alvin Bragg also helped to uncover the use of pre-paid credit and debit cards in the structuring of the campaign finance contributions and the payment of ballot harvesting mules.
Does anyone find it interesting that Alvin Bragg charged Donald J Trump criminally with a campaign finance violation, while benefiting from a money laundering RICO enterprise?

Has Alvin Bragg refunded all of the illegal campaign finance contributions made to his campaign yet?

BUYING THE “JUSTICE YOU WANT”​

This systematic funneling of illicit campaign finance funds was also identified in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race of Janet Protasiewicz. The Janet for Justice campaign took in massive amounts of money from “Individual Contributors” who were also identified as part of the nationwide ActBlue money laundering RICO enterprise.
How much does it take to buy a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2023? Over $23.3 million, was raised, mostly from leftist PACs funded largely through Soros linked organizations and the ActBlue money laundering enterprise.

The nationwide ActBlue money mules and smurfs made massive numbers of individual contributions to the PACs that largely financed the Janet for Justice campaign.
Should the people of Wisconsin be concerned about the purchase of a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat via a massive nationwide money laundering scheme using the stolen identities of the elderly?
Trending: Find the Fed: Here’s Hoping Someone Can Identify the Tattooed “Nazis” at Gathering in Florida …UPDATE: One Nazi Identified – Says He Was Backed by CIA

How many other judges and courts have been compromised nationwide at the Federal, State and local levels?​

THEY SAY “FOLLOW THE MONEY” SO WE DID…​

The information on Fani Willis campaign contributions was obtained directly from the State of Georgia campaign finance database “HERE”.

The first item we identified in the Fani Willis campaign finance report was that there were 222 contributions to her campaign that had ZERO donor information.

Another point of interest was that many of the campaign contributions to the Fani Willis campaign were from out of state contributors. Many of these out of state contributors fit the profile of the ActBlue money laundering scheme victims and participants that we had identified in every single state across America.
You can check the names for yourself using the FEC campaign finance database “HERE”.

The out of state “SMURFS” raised significant suspicions.

Why would elderly people who do not contribute in their own local elections be interested in making campaign contributions to a little known Georgia district attorney beginning in 2022?​

Upon further investigation, a pattern seemed to emerge yet again. When contacted about making campaign contributions to Fani Willis, one of the elderly people on the list stated that she had never made a single campaign finance contribution to her campaign. She assured me that she had not made multiple campaign contributions.
Another interesting pattern raised significant questions. Why had this particular “campaign contributor” been using addresses in multiple states to make campaign contributions? Upon further investigation this “Fani Willis Campaign Contributor” was registered to vote in several states.

Another individual “Fani Willis Campaign Contributor” who had made a single campaign contribution was also identified as a “INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTOR” making campaign finance contributions using addresses in multiple states to include Florida, Wisconsin, Illinois, and New York.
Coincidentally, this individual made identical “CONTRIBUTIONS” via ActBlue to the same PACs and campaigns.
This same individual was also listed as a registered voter in multiple states casting vote by mail ballots.

As we investigate all of the “INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTORS” to the Fani Willis campaign and examine their ongoing contributions via ActBlue we see that all of these individuals are making contributions to the same PACs and candidates.
This ongoing pattern of “ACTIVITY” appears to have started in great scale in 2018 and has rapidly accelerated at the federal, state and local levels.

One of the out of state Fani Willis campaign contributors had made over 9,178 individual contributions just at the federal level since 2018.​

What does it cost to buy the Atlanta District Attorney race?​

How is it that so many people from out of state that are “NOT EMPLOYED” are making so many campaign finance contributions to a little known district attorney in Atlanta, Georgia beginning in 2022?

What is being seen at a growing and alarming rate is that the nationwide money laundering RICO enterprise is making more and more contributions to PACs and these PACs are financing local candidates.
Many of these PACs have strong ties to the numerous Soros connected organizations that are active participants in the nationwide election fraud, money laundering, terrorist network financing and the massive ongoing RICO enterprise.
Since we first exposed the ActBlue enterprise funding, Warnock and the other democrat candidates and PACs, have started to shift the way that they have been operating. However, we have clearly identified who is involved and how they have been illegally influencing the outcomes of elections nationwide.

THE FIRM​

These criminal organizations also share significant connections to the law firm Perkins-Coie. This is the same law firm that was behind the false claims of “Russian Collusion” on the part of the Trump campaign in 2016. The image below is an excerpt from the deposition of FBI Agent Elvis Chan where he admits that he conspired to censor Americans on BigTech and Social Media platforms.
This activity amounted to the largest campaign finance violations in the history of the United States via un disclosed in-kind campaign finance contributions first reported in the Gateway Pundit.

Most large criminal money laundering enterprises function with the assistance of willing attorneys and bankers. Perkins-Coie is by far one of the largest beneficiaries of this RICO money laundering network. The firm received vast sums of illicit money via legal fees paid by the PACs and committees who helped launder the campaign finance contributions made in the name of over a million individuals whose identities have been stolen and used to structure financial transactions and circumvent federal campaign finance limits.

THE BANKS​

ActBlue and the numerous PACs, nonprofits and organizations have been utilizing the services of several large banking institutions. They are JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Amalgamated Bank.
If these esteemed financial institutions had been doing any form of AML/Fraud detection and compliance they would have filed suspicious activities reports and should have certainly raised alarms. Were these reports filed? Who failed to act?
Has a “criminal enterprise” infiltrated the United States Department of Justice and weaponized it against their political opposition?

THE FEC​

How can the Federal Election Commission continue to claim ignorance? The evidence of the massive RICO operation and money laundering enterprise is being directly reported to them? This certainly would fall into the category of “Willful Blindness Doctrine” on their part. We have seen extensive issues with the way that the FEC is handing the data and the receipts of these illicit campaign finance contributions.
Commissioner Trainor has turned a blind eye to many of these violations. This was first reported via my personal communications to the FEC and covered by The Gateway Pundit.
The infiltration of the FEC can also be best viewed through the lens that the FEC claimed that there was no issue with Twitter’s censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story illegally interfering with a legitimate news story that definitively affected the outcome of the 2020 election.

THE RICO ACT​

The RICO Act, which stands for the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federal law in the United States that was enacted in 1970. It was passed as part of the Organized Crime Control Act to combat organized criminal enterprises, particularly those associated with organized crime syndicates.
While the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is primarily a federal law in the United States, some states have adopted their own versions of RICO laws, often referred to as “state RICO” or “Little RICO” laws. Georgia is one of the states which has a RICO statute.
Congress described RICO as “an act designed to prevent ‘known mobsters’ from infiltrating legitimate businesses.”

RICO outlaws four types of activities:
(1) Section 1962(a) prohibits a person from investing in an enterprise any income derived from a pattern of racketeering activity;

(2) Section 1962(b) prohibits a person from using a pattern of racketeering activity to acquire or maintain control over an enterprise;
(3) Section 1962(c) prohibits a person from conducting the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering; and
(4) Section 1962(d) prohibits a person from conspiring to violate §§ 1962(a), (b), or (c). “Racketeering activity” is an element common to all of RICO’s prohibitions.
Congress defined “racketeering activity” to include a variety of state and federal predicate crimes. RICO is not violated by a single, short-term episode of “racketeering.” Rather, there must be a “pattern” of racketeering activity—meaning long-term, organized conduct. Persons convicted of violating RICO’s criminal provisions are subject to imprisonment and forfeiture of certain assets.
Section 1961 defines “racketeering activity” broadly to encompass any of the state and federal predicate offenses listed in § 1961(1). RICO claims must be based on actual racketeering conduct. Conduct that amounts to garden-variety state-law crimes, torts, and contract breaches does not qualify as “racketeering activity” under RICO. The offenses listed in § 1961 are called “predicate acts” because at least one of them must have been committed through a pattern to sustain a RICO claim.

Issues Relating to Mail and Wire Fraud as Predicate Acts​

Mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) are included as racketeering activities and are alleged as predicate acts in a “high percentage” of civil RICO claims. Criminal mail and wire fraud involves: (1) a scheme based on an intent to defraud; and (2) the use of the mails or wires to further that scheme.
The specific elements of mail or wire are:
(1) a plan or scheme to defraud;
(2) intent to defraud;
(3) reasonable foreseeability that the mail or wires will be used; and
(4) actual use of the mail or wires to further the scheme.
Mailings or wirings sent or delivered through the use of “any private or commercial interstate carrier” may violate the mail fraud statute.

• Do you think the use of grossly inflated voter rolls, used to send vote by mail ballots to “voters” with “undeliverable mailing addresses” for ballot harvesting fits the requirements for mail fraud?
• Do you think that using the internet to make fraudulent campaign finance contributions fits the requirements for wire fraud?
• Do you think that using the stolen identity of elderly citizens to launder money into political campaigns fits the requirement for wire fraud?

RICO was designed to prevent the illicit infiltration of legitimate enterprises. This explains why the conduct prohibited in § 1962 is unlawful only if it occurs in connection with the investment in, acquisition of, or operation of an “enterprise” affecting interstate commerce. In other words, RICO generally does not target the enterprise, but the bad actors who misuse or wrongfully acquire or invest in a legitimate enterprise.

Like district attorneys, judges, and other government officials…​

As the investigation unfolds, more details are emerging, leaving citizens bewildered and demanding answers. The sheer audacity of these actions should prompt calls for an immediate and thorough investigation, with many wondering if justice can truly prevail in the face of such staggering allegations.
Fani Willis, once seen as a rising star in the Georgia political arena, is now grappling with a full-blown scandal that threatens to irreparably tarnish her reputation and upend her career. The implications of these revelations are far-reaching, serving as a stark reminder of the fragility of trust in public officials and the lengths some might go to for power and wealth.
In the days and weeks to come, as the investigation intensifies, the world will be watching closely to see how the authorities handle this unprecedented crisis. The fate of Fani Willis hangs in the balance, and the truth behind these explosive allegations will undoubtedly reshape the course of history.

 

[Apollonian]

Media’s Entire Georgia Narrative Is Fraudulent, Not Just The Fabricated Trump Quotes​

BY: MOLLIE HEMINGWAY
MARCH 17, 2021
19 MIN READ

Link: https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/1...udulent-not-just-the-fabricated-trump-quotes/

The Washington Post was busted for publishing fabricated quotes from an anonymous source, attributing them to a sitting president, and using those quotes as a basis to speculate the president committed a crime. The invented Donald Trump quotes, which related to a fight over election integrity in Georgia, were cited in Democrats’ impeachment brief and during the Senate impeachment trial.
But the fake quotes, bad as they were, are just one of many ways the media have done a horrible job of covering election disputes in the state.

According to the media narrative, the Georgia presidential election was as perfectly run as any election in history, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar. To push that narrative, the media steadfastly downplayed, ignored, or prejudiciously dismissed legitimate concerns with how Georgia had run its November 2020 election and complaints about it.
That posture was the complete opposite of how they were reporting on Georgia elections prior to Democrats performing well in them. In the months prior to November, some media sounded a bit like Lin Wood when they wrote about Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Dominion Voting Systems, legal challenges in the state, and Georgia election integrity in general.

How Media Talked About Georgia Before Biden Won​

“Georgia’s Election Mess: Many Problems, Plenty of Blame, Few Solutions for November,” read the June 10, 2020, New York Times headline of a story by Richard Fausset and Reid Epstein about the “disastrous primary election” in June that was “plagued by glitches, but Democrats also saw a systemic effort to disenfranchise voters.”
Citing irregularities with absentee ballots and peculiarities at polling sites, the authors said Georgia’s “embattled election officials” were dealing with a voting system that suffered a “spectacular collapse.” They said it was unclear whether the problems were caused by “mere bungling, or an intentional effort” by Raffensperger and his fellow Republicans in the secretary of state’s office.

“Georgia’s troubled system” would be exacerbated by voting by mail and the increased burden of handling absentee ballots, the article said. The “trouble that plunged Georgia’s voting system into chaos” was related to its Dominion Voting Systems, “which some elections experts had been sounding alarm bells about for months.” Indeed they had!
“Georgia likely to plow ahead with buying insecure voting machines,” wrote Politico’s Eric Geller in March 2019 about the plan to replace voting machines. He said cybersecurity experts, election integrity advocates, and Georgia Democrats had all warned about the security problems of the new machines, which would be electronic but also spit out a marked paper ballot.
“Security experts warn that an intruder can corrupt the machines and alter the barcode-based ballots without voters or election officials realizing it,” he wrote. It was alleged that a “meaningful audit” was “impossible.”
When Georgia picked Dominion Voting Systems in August 2019, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution warned “critics say the system will still be vulnerable to hacking,” citing high-profile hacks of Capital One and Equifax, as well as the online attacks on Atlanta and Georgia courts. “Election officials will have to be on guard against malware, viruses, stolen passwords and Russian interference,” the article continued. Yes, Russians.

“Georgia in Uproar Over Voting Meltdown,” The New York Times proclaimed in a June 9, 2020, story, citing problems with Dominion Voting Systems and Raffensperger’s management of the election. “The machines bought by the state last year were instantly controversial. Security experts said they were insecure. Privacy experts worried that the screens could be seen from nearly 30 feet away. Budget hawks balked at the price tag. And one of Dominion Voting Systems’ lobbyists, Jared Samuel Thomas, has deep connections to Gov. Brian Kemp, the Republican who defeated Ms. Abrams in 2018,” the article read.
Washington Post went with “As Georgia rolls out new voting machines for 2020, worries about election security persist,” which said, “election security experts said the state’s newest voting machines also remain vulnerable to potential intrusions or malfunctions — and some view the paper records they produce as insufficient if a verified audit of the vote is needed.”
If critics on the right were to restate these complaints now, it is likely that tech platforms would ban them or otherwise constrain their free discussion. The same media outlets would likely characterize these claims and concerns as unfounded.

‘Sue and Settle’ Smuggles In Major Change to Mail-In​

Democrats use various strategies to implement changes to voting laws in order to limit election integrity or make it more difficult for election overseers and observers to detect election fraud. One of the approaches is termed “sue and settle.”
Perkins Coie, the law firm that also ordered what became the Russia collusion hoax against Trump in 2016, runs an extremely well-funded and highly coordinated operation to alter how U.S. elections are run. The firm will sue states and get them to make agreements that alter their voting practices.
Marc Elias, well known for his role in the Russia collusion hoax and other Democrat operations, runs the campaign to change voting laws and practices to favor Democrats. Perkins Coie billed the Democrat Party at least $27 million for its efforts to radically change voting laws ahead of the 2020 election, more than double what they charged Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee for similar work in 2016. Elias was sanctioned in federal court just yesterday for some shenanigans related to a Texas election integrity case.
In March, Raffensperger voluntarily agreed to a settlement in federal court with various Democrat groups, which had sued the state over its rules for absentee voting. The end result was a dramatic alteration in how Georgia conducted the 2020 election.
Republicans were not party to the agreement, despite their huge interest in the case. The agreement explicitly states that neither Raffensperger nor the Democratic groups who sued him take a position on whether the laws and procedures being changed were constitutional or not.
Democrats’ high-powered attorneys introduced several significant changes, such as the opportunity to “cure” ballots. That means that when an absentee ballot comes in with problems that would typically lead it to be trashed, the voter is instead given a chance to “cure” or correct the ballot. It also said Democrats would offer training and guidance on signature verification to county registrars and absentee ballot clerks.
Most importantly, the settlement got rid of any meaningful signature match. The law had previously required signatures to match the signature on file with the Georgia voter registration database. But the settlement allowed the signature to match any signature on file, including the one on the absentee ballot application. That meant a fraudulently obtained ballot would easily have a signature match and no way to detect fraud.
The ballot also could only be rejected if a majority of registrars, deputy registrars, and ballot clerks agreed to it, another burden that made it easier to just let all ballots through without scrutiny. It made a huge difference in how many ballots were rejected.
Raffensperger’s decision to voluntarily agree to such a dramatic change in the rules of the game without input from the Republican Party of Georgia, much less the Republican National Committee, angered many Republicans, including Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, as they learned about it following the November 2020 election. Other Republicans felt he harmed election integrity by mailing out millions of absentee ballot applications, ostensibly because of health concerns related to COVID-19.

Election Day Drama​

This brings us to election day. Because so many people had voted by mail or otherwise early, the in-person voting was fairly routine with just a few problems here and there. But one major problem was with counting votes.
A major processing center in Fulton, the state’s most populous county, claimed at one point to have trouble counting ballots in the evening because of a burst pipe or even, some officials said, a water main break. It turned out it was actually a minor urinal leak that had occurred that morning and hadn’t really disrupted anything.
Things only got weirder. That night, an election official curiously announced that they were closing up shop for the evening, even though there were tons of ballots left to count. As workers closed their counting operations and many began to leave, the news media and other election observers left. The news media reported they’d been told the ballot counting would stop.
But even though Fulton publicly said they were stopping the count, they didn’t stop counting ballots. Republicans who were already frustrated that they weren’t near enough to properly observe the counting were outraged and cried foul when they discovered they’d been misled and encouraged to leave.
Election officials denied wrongdoing. A video came out corroborating the claims of Republican poll watchers and the media about being told the counting would stop. The video also showed ballots being pulled out from under a table, and other suspicious actions that led many observers to question the integrity of the operation. Fulton County and Georgia secretary of state officials pooh-poohed the concerns or claimed, without providing a report or substantive rebuttal, that they’d looked into the situation and found nothing problematic.
For context, the shutdown — or not — of the counting of ballots was at the point in the evening when people nationwide were realizing that the media’s polls purporting to show that Biden would win the election significantly and easily were false. Trump had won Florida big. He had won Ohio big. He had won Iowa big. He was performing better than the polls had told people he’d perform. And he was up big in Georgia, too.
Many days after election day, with ballots taking an extremely long time to count, Biden began taking a small lead in the Georgia race. A “secret,” “well-funded cabal” of left-wing groups, as Time magazine would later describe them, had told allies in the media to prepare for a situation where Trump was ahead bigly on election night but Biden pulled ahead as the days dragged on. It was part of the Democrat strategy.
But for Republicans, already concerned about the inherent lack of election integrity associated with mail-in ballots, the questionable security and chain of custody problems associated with rampant use of ballot drop-boxes, the large outside funding of vote processes by tech oligarchs, and all the other problems wrought by voting and counting ballots over a period of many weeks, if not months, the situation was deeply alarming.
Even without all these changes, average Americans’ ability to trust an election is free and fair is one of the most important and basic things that preserves the republic. In 2020, election officials who were introducing radical changes at the same time scrutiny was being done away with were playing with fire.
All that being said, Biden was looking like he won Georgia by enough of a margin to make any challenges a heavy lift.

A Serious Lawsuit Is Filed​

While conspiracy theories about election fraud went wild during this time — ranging from The New York Times’ claim that there was no election fraud anywhere in the entire country to dramatic claims of a global conspiracy involving Venezuela and voting machines — the Trump campaign’s official claims in its lawsuit filed on Dec. 4, 2020, were sober and serious. They weren’t alleging foreign meddling or outside hacking, as The New York Times, Washington Post, Politico, and Atlanta Journal-Constitution warned just months earlier were serious concerns.
The Georgia Supreme Court had previously ruled that challengers to an election don’t need to show definitive fraud with particular votes, just that there were enough irregular ballots or violations of election procedures to place doubt in the result. Judges never want to overturn the results of an election, but under Georgia law, the remedy for showing enough problems to cast doubt was that a new election be held. One was already scheduled for early January for Senate runoff races. Trump’s lawsuit argued that it appeared votes had come from:

• 2,560 felons,
• 66,247 underage registrants,
• 2,423 people who were not on the state’s voter rolls,
• 4,926 voters who had registered in another state after they registered in Georgia, making them ineligible,
• 395 people who cast votes in another state for the same election,
• 15,700 voters who had filed national change of address forms without re-registering,
• 40,279 people who had moved counties without re-registering,
• 1,043 people who claimed the physical impossibility of a P.O. Box as their address,
• 98 people who registered after the deadline, and, among others,
• 10,315 people who were deceased on election day (8,718 of whom had been registered as dead before their votes were accepted).

Unlike so much of the Trump campaign’s legal efforts, outside observers agreed that this lawsuit was serious:

The 64-page complaint is a linear, cogently presented description of numerous election-law violations, apparently based on hard data. If true, the allegations would potentially disqualify nearly 150,000 illegal votes in a state that Biden won by only 12,000.

But as legitimate as the lawsuit was, it entered a Kafka-esque world where it couldn’t get heard.
The election code in Georgia requires that an election contest has to be served to defendants by the sheriff. The clerk is supposed to quickly give special notice to the relevant sheriffs that it needs to be served, since election lawsuits need extremely quick resolution and require a hearing within 20 days.
Lawyers for Trump had to keep asking the clerk to give that special notice to the sheriffs where the defendants lived. In one case, a county sheriff waited until the end of January of 2021 before asking if he should serve it.
At the same time, all sorts of attorneys associated with Elias and Perkins Coie began filing pro hac vice requests, where you ask to appear in court for a particular trial, even though you’re not admitted to the bar in that state. The powerhouse attorneys began filing all sorts of special motions to dismiss, even before they were given permission. The Trump attorneys were responding anyway, just in case a court took those requests seriously.
Fulton County Judge Constance Russell, assigned by lottery to the case, turned out to be ineligible because the law says the judge hearing the case can’t be an active sitting judge from the county where the suit is filed. But before she left the case, she entered an interim order that the case was going to go on a normal procedural course, “which means it will not be resolved any time soon,” as the Journal-Constitution put it.
The Trump team had filed their lawsuit with an emergency temporary restraining order request to prevent certification of the election. When Raffensperger certified the election, the Trump team withdrew their motion and filed a new emergency motion to decertify.
With no hearing in sight, the Trump team — desperate to get to a court date before the Electoral College convened — appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court, asking it to grant immediate review of that interim order slow-walking the case, as well as the judge. That court said they couldn’t do anything about the interim order because they lacked final jurisdiction.
They did get a liberal senior judge from Cobb County, Adele Grubbs, to handle the case. She set a date for a hearing of Jan. 8, which was of no help to the Trump team as it was after Jan. 6, when Congress would process the Electoral College vote.
In the midst of all this, the Trump team also had a federal case before Judge Mark Cohen on Jan. 5. That case dealt with the Trump team’s view that they had not gotten their day in Fulton County Superior Court, which they perceived as a due process violation.
While he dismissed the case, noting that they’d soon have a hearing before Grubbs, Cohen also noted that the power and authority to do anything about the election dispute lies with Congress, not the court. All the lawsuits being filed over the country were being turned away by courts and dismissed for lack of standing, but this judge provided some direction by saying the power regarding contesting the 2020 election lay with Congress, and not the courts.
Following Trump’s phone call with Raffensperger’s team on Jan. 2, counsel for Raffensperger sent a letter saying that if the Trump team wanted access to the state’s data in order to determine the merits of their claims about improper voting, they would have to drop their lawsuit.
“[W]e are still willing to cooperatively share information with you outside the pending litigation on the condition that all currently pending suits against the Governor, the Secretary of State, and/or the members of the State Election Board be voluntarily dismissed. Absent dismissal, we have no choice but to remain in a litigation posture and to continue resolving these disputes in court,” wrote Christopher Anulewicz.
The Trump team discussed whether to accept the offer. They decided to opt for access to the information. A letter from a Trump attorney said the offer was accepted and that “[w]e look forward to working and meeting with” staff to “receive the heretofore withheld November 3, 2020 election data,” specifically mentioning expert reports, official election records, voter registration records, applications for absentee ballots, investigative reports, and other relevant data and information. The team suggested making a joint statement that the contest had been settled.
Raffensperger’s team opened the email immediately but waited several hours to respond, and when they did, they claimed they’d never made an offer to share information, just that they wouldn’t even consider discussing the matter unless the case was dropped.

Finally … The Phone Calls​

This brings us back to the phone calls.
We now know that the account of Trump’s call to an investigator was based on false quotes. Another call with Raffensperger was also leaked to the press to harm those who opposed Raffensperger’s handling of the election, days before another pivotal election.
Much of the angst over the calls was about Trump saying he needed the secretary of state to “find” votes. This was always characterized as him asking Raffensperger to commit fraud or do something unethical. It even made it into the article of impeachment that Democrats supported.
Anyone familiar with the lawsuit knew Trump was saying his team had already “found” nearly 150,000 irregular or fraudulent votes and simply needed the secretary of state’s office to agree. He was saying they didn’t need to agree that all 150,000 were bad, just that fewer than 10 percent of them were problematic.
The secretary of state and his team kept asserting that Trump’s figures were wrong. Trump’s legal team kept asking Raffensperger to provide the state data and information that would enable them to see for themselves. For some reason, Raffensperger and his team have never been willing to share their data or reports.
Fox News’ Martha MacCallum asked Raffensperger directly if he authorized the leak of the second call, and he repeatedly refused to answer the question. The leak happened just days before a close Senate race that Republicans would lose, and Raffensperger admitted to MacCallum that it coincided with his anger at Republican Sen. David Perdue, whom he blamed for animosity directed at his wife after Perdue called for him to resign.
Jordan Fuchs, the deputy secretary of state, has also been fingered as being involved in both of those leaks, and the Washington Post said she agreed to be named as the source of the quotes on the former call. Fuchs has no background in election management or experience running a large organization, but she was Raffensperger’s campaign manager in 2018.
That might explain why she has run the office more as a campaign shop. Even the mildest of criticisms of her boss and their office meet brutal pushback, which has caused a serious deterioration with the legislature and many Republicans, even before the last few months.
Fuchs’s Twitter account isn’t quite as unhinged as Jen Rubin’s or Bill Kristol’s, but it’s pretty close. There are few NeverTrumpist arguments she avoids, and she shares the media’s newfound talking point that election fraud is a “big lie.” It doesn’t exactly build confidence that she knows what she’s doing, is able to separate her emotions from her work, or is capable of understanding legitimate complaints with how she manages elections.
For months, the Trump team tried desperately to get a hearing in court to make their case, and the court dockets prove that. In fact, they kept getting into trouble for how aggressively they were trying to get a hearing. Trump attorneys were on record saying they wanted the hearing so they might get access to Raffensperger’s information. The information was really what they were after.
They issued a statement after the leak to the Washington Post saying Raffensperger’s office “has made many statements over the past two months that are simply not correct and everyone involved with the efforts on behalf of the President’s election challenge has said the same thing: show us your records on which you rely to make these statements that our numbers are wrong.”
Raffensperger’s office finally said, after that infamous phone call, that they’d share state data and information “on the condition” that the Trump team drop their lawsuit. They agreed to that. Instead of turning over the data that would settle the issue, Fuchs and Raffensperger issued a press release that said, “on the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination.”
It showed just how political Raffensperger and Fuchs are. While the media strongly support Raffensperger, at least until such time as a Republican wins in Georgia again, the concern about the integrity of the election remains.
Perhaps Raffensperger is completely and totally correct. But it would behoove him to share the data that proves that rather than issue antagonistic and uncharitable press releases while sitting on the information that could settle the issue.
As for the media, they’re doing what they always do — advancing a political agenda. Believing their characterization of lawsuits, phone calls, or anything else they report on is unwise.
But it wasn’t just the quotes they got wrong about Georgia. It was pretty much everything.
Update: This piece was updated to correct spelling, and that the Secretary of State’s office mailed ballot applications out to millions of Georgians.

 

[Apollonian]

BREAKING: Proud Boys Leader Enrique Tarrio Drops Bombshell – Names Top Biden DOJ Attorneys Who Told Him to Lie on Trump and Sign False Statements – Here They Are…​

By Jim Hoft Sep. 9, 2023 8:00 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/breaking-enrique-tarrio-drops-names-two-biden-officials/

[hear audio tape at site link, above]

Enrique Tarrio: “They told me to LIE about President Trump in order to indict him. I told them to pound sand.”

FLORIDA, USA – FEBRUARY 28: Enrique Tarrio, leader of the Proud Boys is seen outside the Hyatt Regency Hotel during Conservative Political Action Conference, in Orlando, Florida, United States on February 28, 2021. (Photo by Eva Marie Uzcategui Trinkl/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
On Thursday The Gateway Pundit’s Cara Castronuovo reported that Biden officials asked him to lie about President Trump in order to indict him!
“They asked me to LIE about President Trump in order to indict him,” Enrique Tarrio exclusively told the Gateway Pundit. “I told them to pound sand, and because I refused to lie about President Trump it cost me twenty-two years of my life.”

“The truth is, I could have been home,” said Tarrio. “I could have been home a long time ago. I could be in my warm ass bed right now, laughing at the world, without a problem…and all I had to do in order to do that WAS LIE ABOUT TRUMP. All I had to do was confirm a lie.”
Tarrio opened up to the Gateway Pundit after he was sentenced to decades in prison by the Dishonorable Judge Kelly on Tuesday. He told us that the prosecutors in the Department of Justice attempted to coerce him into signing a false statement that would implicate President Trump by swearing that “through several degrees of separation and connections, Tarrio had communicated with Trump regarding ‘plans’ for January 6th.”
Return of COVID Restrictions? Instead Of Complying, Here’s One Way To Be Prepared
** DONATE HERE TO HELP ENRIQUE FIGHT FOR HIS LIFE
On Friday night The Gateway Pundit held a Twitter space with Enrique Tarrio as special guest.
TGP reporters Cara Castronuova and Alicia Powe organized Friday night’s Twitter Space.
During Friday night’s Twitter Space Enrique Tarrio repeated his accusations against the Biden regime.
Later in the discussion Enrique disclosed two names of Biden officials who were in the meeting when he was pressured by federal agents to lie about President Trump.
Enrique Tarrio announced two DOJ officials who were in the room during this meeting:

** DOJ Lead Prosecutor Jocelyn Ballantine
** Assistant US Attorney Jason McCullough

Jocelyn Ballantine was a DOJ attorney staffed on General Michael Flynn’s prosecution. The DOJ admitted to altering evidence in Flynn’s case and the government eventually dropped the case against General Flynn.
Ballantine was caught lying during a DOJ investigation of Strzok and McCabe. She still holds a job as a top official in Merrick Garland’s DOJ.
Attorney Jason McCullough recently urged jurors to convict the Proud Boys of seditious conspiracy.
NOVA Campaign found the name of the FBI helicopter pilot who was also in the room that day.

FBI Helicopter pilot Kate Camilieri – in on the deceit
Here is the audio of Enrique outing two DOJ officials who pressured him to lie under oath to get Trump. [ck site link, above, top to hear]

 

[Apollonian]

Trump Gets Huge Court Victory, Fani Willis’ Case in Shambles​

Melinda DaviesSeptember 15, 2023

Link: https://newsaddicts.com/trump-gets-...willis-case-in-shambles/?utm_source=mailpoet/

Donald Trump’s legal team is celebrating a tremendous court victory in its Trump RICO case and Fulton County DA Fani Willis must be throwing things against the wall. That’s because Judge Scott McAfee ruled to sever the cases of Trump Rico. Defendants Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell, meaning they can’t be tried with Trump.

ABC NEWS reported: “In the Georgia election interference case against former President Trump and 18 others, the judge has severed the cases of two of those defendants who will now be tried separately from the former president and the rest of the group. Prosecutors say they’ll also hand over the names of 30 unindicted co-conspirators to defense counsel… This is not a good day for the Fulton County DA.
I mean, Fani Willis wasn’t there, but you got to imagine, Diane, she’s throwing things against the wall based on this hearing. So let’s start where you just began. So first, the team for the federal, the prosecutors down there had been arguing. Keep everybody together, keep all 19 because really what we learned today, we’re going to have a show this fall, and then we’re going to have a repeat performance next spring, which makes it incredibly difficult for prosecutors, a great win for Donald Trump and others that did not want to be part of this speedy trial case. I can tell you, sitting here with you, just texting with some of the attorneys involved in the other defendants celebrating ‘Yay, victory’. This is everything they wanted was to take more time and slow this down.”
This will significantly slow down Fannie Willis’ case and Trump won’t be facing trial in this case in October as originally planned. Now it is more likely to be December. The judge’s decision came after the defense team laid out damning information that the Fulton County prosecutors were likely hiding exculpatory evidence in the case. Defense attorney Brian Rafferty, thus accuses Fulton County’s lawyers of withholding documentation that the Coffee County voting machine data search was indeed authorized.

RAFFERTY: “I’ve been in this case probably for a month and on August 30th, shortly after I got into this case, I sent a very detailed Brady request to the government. Those Brady obligations, as Your Honor knows, are independent of their discovery obligations as it relates to this hard drive. They have a due process obligation to turn over to me favorable information, and I didn’t send them some blanket requests saying, give me everything under the sun. It was a very, very pointed request on August 30th that addressed two critical issues for Ms. Powell. That is number one, that she wasn’t behind this incident in Coffee County, which forms the basis of her inclusion in this indictment. And number two, that whatever happened in Coffee County, there’s ample evidence out there that it was authorized. Okay, so I’ve asked for that very specific evidence in response to my letter on August 30th.

I heard nothing from the state, and so this week I sent an even more tailored request, a copy of which I can provide to your Honor, asking for specific information because I’ve spent the past month or so trying to figure out what happened and have gathered ample evidence showing those two things that Ms. Powell was not behind all of this and that it was authorized. I filed a motion last night that sets out all the evidence that I’ve been able to find on my own, which I hope the state has. Okay? But the most important thing that I’ve found, your Honor, is a report by CNN, which I’ve been able to confirm that there is a letter, letter of invitation from Coffee County on January 1st, 2021 that was sent, and it was sent not to Ms. Powell, it was sent to another lawyer inviting folks to come down to Coffee County and do whatever it is that they do.
What does that establish, your Honor, two things. One, what I’ve been saying since last week in my severance motion, what I said in my motion last night, what I’ll keep banging the drum on, which is this was not Ms. Powell, that’s number one, but number two, that this was authorized. It was authorized, and I have asked for that. I have not asked for eight terabytes versus discovery. This is a handful of documents. We’ve got eight lawyers sitting on this side. I’m pretty sure they know how to attach a document to an email. But in response to that email that I sent this week, like my letter I sent last in August 30th, I heard squat from the state. So they sit here and say, your Honor, that they are open and they’re going to turn stuff over. I have been as clear as day about specifically what I’m entitled to under the Constitution due process, Brady v Maryland, independent of any discovery obligations they have, that is exculpatory information that establishes that Ms. Powell should not be in this case.

They have it, your Honor. I have a reason to believe they have it and they don’t even respond. I have a motion. I’m going to file it. I’m going to ask for this relief, but I shouldn’t have to file it. If this were in federal court, rule five, your Honor would issue an order upon arraignment ordering them to turn that material over because they have to. They don’t have a choice and they haven’t done it. Here, I’m concerned. I practice mostly in federal court with federal prosecutors who know that I have concerns that Mr. Wade and the other folks on this side don’t appreciate their Brady obligation. So I’m asking the court to order them to produce Brady material immediately because they’re required to.”
This could prove to be a fatal blow to Fani Willis’ case. It is one of the three legs of the coffee table that is holding up her already thin Trump Rico case. If the Coffee County data search was authorized, there goes one criminal activity that Willis could cite to hold together her case.

Willis also has exculpatory evidence in her possession that the so-called fake elector’s case is bogus because the defendant’s David Shafer and Sean Still and Cathy Latham are all in the clear. That’s because the record clearly shows they were not attempting to become official electors, but merely submitting statements as potential Trump electors on a slate of alternate electors.
Thus, Willis may be guilty of making a false statement to the court herself by knowingly misrepresenting the elector’s claims.
Remember, Brad Raffensperger’s testimony does not support Willis’s claim that Trump had suggested anything illegal when he asked him to find votes. Instead, he wanted Raffensperger to remove allegedly illegal votes that weren’t contention in Fulton County.

Therefore, everything that Donald Trump wanted to do in Georgia during the 2020 election was perfectly legal, and Fani Willis knows it.
This case should be immediately dismissed.

 

[Apollonian]

Here's some commentary on the globalist-satanist activity against Trump, w. side-comment on the corrupt, conspiratorial FBI agent, Strzok

 

[Apollonian]

Stupid niggas will be niggas, folks--this is actually amazing for the idiot incompetence of it all--the niggas didn't think this would all be found out and used against them?

 

[Apollonian]

Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade splurged on lavish trips with Fani Willis while ex-wife struggled ‘without any means of financial support’: court docs​

By Social Links forMegan Palin
Published Jan. 10, 2024, 9:10 p.m. ET

Link: https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/news/...-on-lavish-trips-with-fani-willis-court-docs/

[see vid at site link, above]

MORE ON:GEORGIA​

• Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade steps out armed with handgun after bombshell Fani Willis affair allegations — and didn’t deny tryst​

• MTG files criminal complaint against Fani Willis and ‘secret lover’ prosecuting Trump case​

• Georgia DA Fani Willis is the star of a low-rent soap opera, not a Trump blockbuster​

• Restaurant slammed after charging customers 4 percent health insurance fee​

A top prosecutor leading the election interference case against Donald Trump in Georgia has allegedly left his estranged wife “without any means of financial support” while splurging on “lavish trips” for himself and his boss, Fani Willis.
Nathan Wade, who has been married for 26 years and shares two adult children with his wife, Joycelyn, filed for divorce in Cobb County, outside Atlanta, in November 2021, according to court records.
The filings in the ongoing case have been sealed since February 2022.
The former couple’s marriage came under the spotlight on Monday when Michael Roman, a former Trump 2020 campaign official, filed a bombshell motion that claimed Wade and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis traveled together to vacation destinations including Florida, Napa Valley and the Caribbean.
The details of their alleged lifestyles are apparently a far cry from those of Joycelyn Wade.
The ex-wife claimed in a motion for expenses filed last month and obtained by The Post that Wade has left her with next to nothing, despite him having earned more than $650,000 in legal fees from the Trump case alone since 2022.
That court filing alleges that Joycelyn is in “dire need of financial support” because she is unemployed after having been a “stay-at-home mom for 26 years” and has “no access to marital funds.”
In the documents obtained by The Post, Joycelyn claims that Wade had habitually deposited $700 bi-weekly into a joint account for household expenses but was now tapping into that for his own use and sending it into overdraft.
3
A top prosecutor leading the election interference case against Donald Trump in Georgia has allegedly left his estranged wife “without any means of financial support.”Getty Images
“While earning such substantial sums, (Wade) has provided nearly nothing to (Joycelyn) for her support and survival and has often caused (her) bank account to be in overdraft,” the motion reads.
According to the documents, Joycelyn is seeking temporary spousal support and interim attorney fees.
Meanwhile, though no proof has emerged, Wade has come under fire after allegedly being romantically linked to Willis — who brought election interference charges against Trump and his 18 co-defendants and hired Wade to prosecute them.
Roman argued in his court filing that Willis should be disqualified from the case and the charges against him dropped because of her alleged “improper, clandestine personal relationship” with Wade.
“Willis and Wade have engaged in a personal relationship both before and after Willis appointed Wade as the special prosecutor in the instant case,” it claims.
3
Nathan Wade, who has been married for 26 years and shares two adult children with his wife, Joycelyn, filed for divorce in Cobb County, outside Atlanta, in November 2021, according to court records.ALYSSA POINTER/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
“Willis and Wade were romantically involved prior to Willis awarding a contract for legal services with Wade. It is not entirely clear when the relationship began, but it began while Wade was married.”
He further claimed in the motion that Willis’ failure to disclose her alleged relationship with Wade while paying him for his work on the Trump case — funds that he also allegedly used to pay for lavish vacations with the DA — could amount to honest services fraud as well as “a predicate act which could result in a RICO charge against both the district attorney and the special prosecutor,” referring to Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
“While the filings in the divorce case are sealed by Court order (the legality of which is open to question), information obtained outside of court filings indicates that the district attorney and special prosecutor have traveled personally together to such places as Napa Valley, Florida and the Caribbean and the special prosecutor has purchased tickets for both of them to travel on both the Norwegian and Royal Caribbean cruise lines,” it states.
“Traveling together to such places as Washington, D.C. or New York City might make sense for work purposes in light of other pending litigation, but what work purpose could only be served by travel to this traditional vacation destinations?”
He also alleged in the filing that Wade and Willis have been seen in private together in the Atlanta area and are “believed to have co-habited in some form or fashion at a location owned by neither of them.”
3
The ex claimed in a motion for expenses filed last month and obtained by The Post that Wade has left her with next to nothing, despite him having earned more than $650,000 in legal fees from the Trump case alone since 2022.@purevinesfreshwines
Wade, his estranged wife and the Fulton County DA’s Office did not immediately respond to The Post’s requests for comment.
Trump and Roman were both hit with racketeering charges in Willis’ case against them and other co-defendants under Georgia’s RICO Act.
Roman served as the Trump re-election campaign’s director of Election Day operations in 2020.
In the wake of the former president’s 2020 loss, Roman allegedly joined an effort to put forward slates of pro-Trump “fake electors” to reject President-elect Joe Biden’s victories in key swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada.

 

[Apollonian]

More discussion, analysis of the Fani nigga DA harassing Trump saga, suckers

 

[Apollonian]

FOX News/Judge Jeanine comments upon the Fani situation, suckers

 

[Apollonian]

Fani, the nigga, paid her married lover-boy nigga, in return for luxury cruise tickets--niggas think this is ok, suckers--after all u don't wanna be racist, do u?