This is what happens when u go against the satanic establishment, morons--u can't beat them as they have the big banks behind them, suckers

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Whistleblower’s Secret Dossier Prove a Construct to ‘Shut Up’ Reiner Füllmich & ‘Put Him Behind Bars’​

BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON APRIL 11, 2024

Link: https://expose-news.com/2024/04/11/...-shut-up-reiner-fullmich-put-him-behind-bars/

[see vids at site link, above]

Whistleblower-dossier.png

A whistleblower passed a “secret dossier” written by intelligence services to Reiner Füllmichs defence attorney Dr. Miseré which provides both evidence and supporting facts, that now prove beyond reasonable doubt according to Dr Füllmich that the criminal proceedings against him are nothing more than a “construct” to “shut him up and put him behind bars “without any legal substance whatsoever.”
Dr. Miseré read from the dossier in court on day 9 of the proceedings and revealed that there had been a “declaration of action” and their express purpose to ‘take him out’ notably out of any possibility of gaining a position in the political arena (source)
The declaration was was preceded by a detailed report on Reiner Füllmich which stated that during the pandemic, he became the focus of public attention and that he would disrupt internal security.” It also revealed that Dr. Reiner Füllmich had apparently been under surveillance by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the BKA and the Federal Intelligence Service since 24.08.2021. (source)
According to the dossier, ‘something must be done’ and a ‘thorough investigation into Reiner Füllmich must be carried out, as he poses a threat to public order, democracy and the rule of law. He has a great influence on the social climate, he could incite unrest and it is imperative to prevent him from taking on politically exposed offices and to prevent him from obtaining them by all means.’(source)
According to Füllmich, his actions had at no time had any criminal relevance, because everything was openly disclosed and these were matters of company law and not criminal law. A criminal complaint had now been filed against Mr. John, the public prosecutor. The defense also requested his removal from office.
The dossier can be viewed in full at the bottom of the page, along with videos containing both defense attorney Katja Woermer and Reiner Füllmich’s updates regarding the whistleblower dossier.

Dr Füllmich update – The Secret Dossier​


Katja Woermer, Reiner Fullmich’s main lawyer, describes the dossier that was passed to Dr Miseré, the new member of Reiner’s legal team. ‘Reiner is very pleased. Everything is being verified.’ Katja Woermer says that this was due to his work for the Corona Committee and that the ultimate object was to create an act or statement of facts to serve to justify criminal proceedings by criminal authorities and the courts.

Wolfgang Jeschke has written a piece that explains the conspiracy against Dr Reiner that may be interesting to some readers.

The Füllmich conspiracy
April 9, 2024 | Society​

by Wolfgang Jeschke
image-98.png

The coordinated execution of a democratic enlightener

Was Dr. Reiner Füllmich under observation by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution? Of course. Are there any reports from the “security services” about the enlightener? Of course. Anyone who stands up to those in power is being watched. That’s a truism. If a critic gains too much importance and reach, he is discriminated against, demonetized and, if none of this helps, arrested and imprisoned. In the case of Dr. Reiner Füllmich, the system even went so far as to illegally kidnap him from Mexico. That’s how eager the system was to silence him. In doing so, the public prosecutor’s office used the complicity of people close to Dr. Füllmich. However, this was not only proven by the ominous dossier that emerged at the beginning of April, but by the meticulous questioning of witnesses by Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer and Dr. Füllmich himself. The first half of the trial at Göttingen District Court was already able to prove it: It is a plot by the public prosecutor’s office and the people who are after the committee’s money.
Is the paper that recently surfaced, which is supposed to prove the organized persecution of Füllmich, genuine? Nobody knows yet. But that is also irrelevant. Even without the dossier, which was leaked to Dr. Füllmich’s co-counsel, the Cologne lawyer Dr. Christof Miseré, the plot against the German lawyer and investigator has already been proven. Whether authorities other than the Göttingen public prosecutor’s office in the form of public prosecutor Simon Philipp John were involved, whether there were instructions from politicians or from overseas, is irrelevant. The Füllmich case is a fabricated case, his abduction from Mexico was illegal, the trial is based on false accusations. The complainants are quite obviously accomplices in the illegal abduction of the lawyer. The investigation into the facts of the case and the questioning of witnesses clearly showed this as early as the middle of the trial.
BACKGROUND:
Three alleged comrades-in-arms of Dr. Reiner Füllmich filed a criminal complaint against the head of the former Corona Committee on 02.09.2022. The three port lawyers in question are Antonia Fischer, Justus Hoffmann and Marcel Templin. Hoffmann and Fischer were Füllmich’s co-partners on the Corona Committee, Templin appeared in the context of Dr. Füllmich’s planned class action lawsuit. The trial: The main accusation is that Füllmich did not repay loans amounting to EUR 700,000 to the committee, but used them for himself. The trial revealed that Füllmich did not use the money for himself. In agreement with his then assessor Viviane Fischer, he had kept it safe from the threat of seizure by the state.

The loans were to be returned to the committee when the risk of seizure by the state no longer existed. The port lawyers thwarted the return of the loans in cooperation with a notary. The money is now unlawfully in the hands of his persecutors, who are apparently being covered up by the public prosecutor’s office, which had Füllmich kidnapped from Mexico with the help of the “port lawyers” – without an international arrest warrant and without any chance for Füllmich to defend himself against the deportation by legal means.
The faltering constitutional state is resisting clarification.
Füllmich was abducted without an international arrest warrant in collaboration with the Mexican authorities, circumventing international law. In this illegal abduction, Füllmich was denied the right to appeal and thus prevent his deportation. In doing so, both the FRG and Mexico deliberately put themselves in the wrong. This is the behavior of dictatorships and not of democratic constitutional states.
The arrest that then took place in the FRG (at Frankfurt Airport) was based on fabricated accusations against the former head of the Corona Committee. These were raised by the three lawyers who supposedly wanted to fight with Füllmich against the coronavirus tyranny. After the scandal with Viviane Fischer, Füllmich set out with his own international project ICIC (www.ICIC.law) to identify the global actors of the staged crises in the world and uncover the perpetrator structures behind the wars, pandemics, poisonings and psychological operations.

In order to kidnap Dr. Füllmich from Mexico and put an end to his work as an investigator, accomplices were recruited from his entourage, according to the results of the questioning of prosecution witnesses Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer, who did not cut a good figure at the trial. On the contrary. In the end, they admitted that the negotiations with Dr. Füllmich only served to put the head of the former Corona Committee behind bars.
It also became clear during the trial that the so-called “port lawyers”, namely Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin, who, together with the public prosecutor Simon Philipp John, were conducting the illegal prosecution of Dr. Füllmich, also wanted to relieve him of his savings and did so successfully. Documents prove the close cooperation between the public prosecutor’s office and the “port lawyers”. Even the illegal abduction was based on a coordinated action between the public prosecutor’s office, the port lawyers and the Mexican authorities. A genuine conspiracy to destroy the investigator Füllmich.
A constitutional state would have arrested Reiner Füllmich with an international arrest warrant with the help of Interpol. Füllmich’s whereabouts were known. The available documents prove that the public prosecutor’s office, together with the “port lawyers”, developed perverse moves to lure Dr. Füllmich into a trap. The available documents, correspondence and minutes prove that Dr. Füllmich was the victim of a conspiracy in which the public prosecutor’s office was obviously involved.
As an agent of the persecutors, Antonia Fischer was the communicative bridgehead between the port prosecutors and the public prosecutor’s office.
Antonia Fischer and public prosecutor Philipp Simon John.
For months, Fischer passed on the correspondence with Reiner Füllmich and all internal details to the public prosecutor’s office. The “port lawyers” were never interested in resolving the funding issues, but only in putting Dr. Füllmich behind bars and obtaining funds from the committee’s coffers.
What is remarkable about the communication between public prosecutor John and his accomplices on the side of the port lawyers is the fact that public prosecutor John unlawfully did not keep any records of the numerous telephone conversations with his informants. However, even so, the existing mails provide a conclusive picture of the conspiracy, the aim of which was the arrest and destruction of Dr. Reiner Füllmich. It is safe to assume that there were further agreements between the public prosecutor’s office and the port lawyers.
Illegal abduction – a crime.
Füllmich’s illegal arrest alone would, in a constitutional procedure, require his release and the restoration of the situation that prevailed before his illegal arrest:
“It goes without saying that detention initiated by an abduction is a deprivation of liberty in violation of the fundamental right under Article 2 (2) sentence 2 of the Basic Law (…). In the given case that the persecuting state does not seize the persecuted person through the prescribed extradition channels, but through deliberate criminal machinations, the construction apparently envisaged by the BVerfG of a deprivation of liberty that subsequently becomes lawful with the opening of the arrest warrant in Germany is also out of the question.
Even under general state liability law, an unlawful encroachment on fundamental rights triggers a claim for the elimination of consequences, which, at least in the case of an intentionally unlawful encroachment on fundamental rights, may not be weighed against other interests unless an incentive to violate fundamental rights is to be created and thus the core area of the principle of the rule of law is to be attacked. (…) The kidnapping in violation of extradition law is a stain on the vest of the rule of law, which in extreme cases such as Eichmann’s case may still count on a certain degree of understanding due to its historical and political uniqueness, but in everyday cases of violations committed by German authorities even threatens to shake confidence in the integrity of the administration of criminal justice as a whole.”
Prof. Bernd Schünemann, from “Substantive examination of suspicion and abduction in violation of international law as nation-state explosive devices in international extradition traffic”. Source: 140 years of Goldammer’s Archive for Criminal Law, Festschrift for OPaul-Günter Pötz.
The kidnapping from Mexico:
no extradition procedure under the rule of law, but tricks, deception and arbitrariness. This is how banana republics and dictatorships act.
image-97.png

The execution of Dr. Füllmich:
However, the starting signal for the prosecution of the internationally active investigator was given by the number 2 of the former Corona Committee: the Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer. With her as an assessor, Füllmich had turned the Corona Committee into a national authority of the Corona resistance. In the chain of intrigues against Dr. Füllmich, Viviane Fischer had begun the execution of her committee partner in September 2022 by publicly expelling him from the committee. She undoubtedly did this with the approval of her friend, the professional politician and medical doctor Wolfgang Wodarg, one of the “heroes” of the anti-measures movement and a former companion of Füllmich at Transparency International. Füllmich’s disappointment with Wodarg is understandable. Wodarg could have intervened. But he did not. This opens up room for speculation.
Shortly after the stab in the back against Füllmich, Viviane Fischer’s accomplices also reappeared out of nowhere: Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer (who had been completely irrelevant to the committee’s work up to that point and again afterwards). The two young lawyers and Wolfgang Wodarg joined forces with Viviane Fischer in a committee meeting against the head of the committee, Füllmich.
Wodarg was visibly satisfied as the new cock in the committee basket and delivered comfortable- sounding political phrases – the two port lawyers were present as “partners” of the Corona Committee and dutifully served their boss Fischer. In this broadcast, Hoffmann claimed that he was not interested in money at all – but later in the documented negotiations, it became clear that the port lawyers were, on the contrary, after the money.
This was one of the reasons why the negotiations over the release of funds dragged on for so long. Even more clearly: Hoffmann claims in this meeting (https://odysee.com/@-Ausschuss:3/s125de: MINUTE 10:57 ff.) that nobody had an interest in the individual prosecution of Füllmich. Another lie by the man who, together with the port lawyers, stood by the public prosecutor’s office and deliberately provided it with false information or supplied it to order. At this point, the port lawyers had already filed the charges with the public prosecutor’s office in coordination with their partners.
image-96.png

– In the video: “But that we want to start some kind of personal involvement, vendetta or anything else against individuals here, I don’t see how anyone would want to come up with that.” By then, Hoffmann had already filed charges against Füllmich.
– In court: “We knew that Rainer’s arrest was imminent and we made sure that it happened.”
– In court: “The day on which I will no longer have anything to do with Reiner Füllmich will be the best day of my life.”
Video link to Justus P. Hoffmann’s statement: odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/s125de:
Standing shoulder to shoulder against Reiner Füllmich: photo (screenshot of committee meeting 125): Viviane Fischer, Justus Hoffmann, Wolfgang Wodarg, Robert Cibis, Antonia Fischer. Not in the picture: Marcel Templin, to whose accounts the proceeds from the sale of Dr. Füllmich’s house ended up. The execution of the father figure has begun.
“We wanted to put you in jail” (Antonia Fischer in court)
The negotiations between Dr. Füllmich and the port lawyers, which aimed to release the committee funds and return them to the committee’s work, never had any prospect of success: Antonia Fischer said in court on 3 April 2024: “We didn’t want a real agreement, we wanted to put you in jail.” The accomplice to the conspiracy thus proves that she was never interested in a civil settlement of the various companies’ property issues. It was all just a tactic to do her job for the system.
image-95.png

It is clear why the young prosecutor John has no problems with the bungling – and presumably even coordinated – “complaint” by the port lawyers. His job was to work with the port prosecutors to kidnap the dissident from abroad and bring him to prison. This also makes it clear why he was not bothered by the fact that the complainants deliberately claimed untrue facts, made demonstrably false accusations and deliberately omitted information. He was only ever concerned with the arrest of Dr. Füllmich – even if it was by illegal means and without a regular extradition procedure. John does not yet seem to realize that he himself will become a pawn in the investigation of the circumstances. The proverbial bus that his instructors are about to throw him under is rolling towards him.
Prosecutor John has so far only frozen the accounts of the Füllmich family – not the account of Marcel Templin, who, with the help of a notary, has taken large parts of the proceeds from the sale of the Füllmichs’ private house. Füllmich wanted to use this money to transfer the agreed loans, which were intended to secure the committee’s assets, back to the committee. According to trial observers, public prosecutor John and Viviane Fischer also appear to have a tacit understanding with each other. Why else is Viviane Fischer not charged with “breach of trust” like Füllmich? According to the indictment, Füllmich and Fischer allegedly committed the “acts” together in collusion. The suspicion that Viviane Fischer is in the same boat as the port lawyers is becoming ever stronger.

Almost all of the proceeds from the sale of the Füllmichs’ family property (1,158,000 euros) ended up in Marcel Templin’s account with the help of the notary who notarized the deed. Due to a land charge, which itself is still questionable and needs to be examined more closely, he would be entitled to a maximum of 600,000 euros, if at all.
Reiner Füllmich would have been in a position at any time to repay the committee funds protected from the state’s access via the loans, as the proceeds from the sale of his property amounted to over 1.345 million euros – had it not been for the illegal detour of the sale proceeds to the account of one of the port lawyers. More precisely, the illegal detour of the sales proceeds by the port lawyers to the account of the accomplice Marcel Templin is the height of perversion: those who denounced Dr. Füllmich because he allegedly did not want to repay the loan deprived him of the opportunity to do so and at the same time illegally appropriated the private funds intended for this purpose.
The example is being made
Reiner Füllmich is still being held in custody. He is led into the Göttingen court in handcuffs, as if he posed even the slightest danger. On the way to court, the handcuffs are also attached to a waist belt, depriving him of any possibility of movement. He is a political prisoner who is of course being made an example of. The undignified treatment of these prisoners is no longer very different from the treatment suffered by people in other totalitarian structures. The hijacked state power demonstrates its mercilessness. The message to the humanists and the last democrats in the country is clear: “This is what we will do to you if you rebel.”
But Reiner Füllmich will not stop pointing out the abuses. And more and more people are gaining more knowledge through his work, which is still effective, in order to recognize the current danger to democracy, humanity and people’s health. This danger does not come from critical minds, but from ruthless globalists, warmongers and mass murderers who have seized control of the structures in most countries Source.

The Full Dossier​

Reiner-Fuellmich-Full-DossierDownload

Days 9 and 10 of the Dr Reiner Füllmich Trial​

Below is a file containing a write up from Jiota previously published in the Telegram channel “wearegreekja” and found on the Truthsummit substack
Days-9-and-10-of-the-Dr-Fuellmich-TrialDownload

For those who have kindly asked for addresses and how to donate, see below.
The current remaining court dates – 6 in total:
  • Friday, 19.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
  • Wednesday, 24.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
  • 4 more added, ending approximately May 15
_________________________________
Here is the address to write to Reiner:
LETTERS;
JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany
  • postcards and cards allowed,
  • no glitter on the envelops,
  • no stamps or money in the envelops,
  • no books or other objects – not permitted,
  • nothing to be mentioned about the case,
  • put your name of each page of the letter – letters are taken out of the envelops.
_________________________________

Sources
Elsa Schneider – The Truth Summit Wolfgang Jeschke at Laufpass – https://laufpass.com/gesellschaft/das-fuellmich-komplott/ Wearegreekja Telegram – https://t.me/wearegreeekja
 

‘Conspiracy Theories’ Aren’t 'Theoretical' Anymore: The US Govt Happily Murders Political Opponents, Carries Out Bioweapon Attacks Upon The Population And Openly Steals Elections​

Link: https://allnewspipeline.com/The_US_...s_Become_The_Laughingstock_Of_The_Planet.php/

[see several vids at site link, above]

- The US Govt Under Joe Biden Has Become The Laughingstock Of The Planet​


By John Green and All News Pipeline

The national mood in the mid-twentieth century was very different from now.

- The United States was respected around the world -- even if not necessarily liked.

- Technology was advancing faster than at any time in human history.

- Our cities were mostly orderly, safe, and clean.

- We believed there were few hardships which couldn’t be overcome with hard work.

- Opportunities seemed endless, as was our optimism.

- We were completely naïve about the danger posed by our own government.


Not everything was sunny. We had problems that needed attention. That is the nature of human existence after all. But when Ronald Reagan said, “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem,” we just thought he was promoting self-reliance and highlighting government inefficiency. As I said, we were naïve.

Along with that naivete, was a belief that our government would never intentionally harm us. It might be incompetent, but we didn’t think it was malicious. Theories of vast government criminal conspiracies were considered delusional. Going to the police and claiming that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA (as Robert Kennedy Jr. is suggesting), would have gotten one labeled a “conspiracy theory” nut; and more likely would trigger a psych evaluation than a criminal investigation. That was the American worldview before Barack Obama.

Things changed in 2016 when the conspiracies stopped being secret. Government operatives decided they could work with a political party to stop an outsider from playing in their sandbox -- by any means necessary. The FBI, CIA, DNC, and MSM created the Russian collusion hoax to undermine Donald Trump’s campaign -- but he won anyway.

Four years later, the same conspirators colluded to withhold critical information from the voters which likely would have changed the outcome of the election. Seventeen percent of Biden voters claim they would have voted differently had they known about the Hunter Biden laptop. This time the plan worked, and Trump was removed from the Oval Office. But he was still a threat.



When Trump announced his intent to run for office again, the DoJ in collusion with Democrat state and local prosecutors commenced a campaign of lawfare to scuttle Trump’s campaign. They twisted the law, and corrupted any notion of justice to indict Trump using legal theories which had never been tried before. They have identified their target, and are trashing our criminal justice system to get him -- and only him. Lavrentiy Beria would be proud.

Of course, the trials are being held in deep Blue Democrat party strongholds. Partisans in robes -- laughably calling themselves “judges” -- are ensuring that trials by Trump’s “peers” are actually trials by the Trump Derangement Syndrome-afflicted. Conviction seems inevitable.

To make sure the Trump problem is solved permanently, Democrat congressman Bennie Thompson has proposed a bill to strip Donald Trump of his Secret Service protection if he is convicted. Does anyone doubt Trump’s fate if placed in Attica or Sing Sing without his protective detail? Though the bill is unlikely to pass, it does reveal the Democrat mindset. They are perfectly willing to see a political adversary murdered -- so long as they maintain plausible deniability. But sure, Donald Trump is the real danger to our country.

Shockingly, the Democrats aren’t even trying to hide their intentions anymore. Apparently, they consider us too stupid or too powerless to stop them. That’s a rather sobering thought.

As we watch all this unfold, we know that vast government criminal conspiracies are no longer theoretical. There is nothing demented or delusional about believing our government would willingly facilitate the murder a political threat. The actions of the DoJ in conjunction with the legislation proposed by the Democrats makes that perfectly clear.

The plot to place Donald Trump at the tender mercies of a prison’s “genpop” is not the only evidence of government criminal conspiracy.

The ATF really did traffic guns to Mexican drug cartels to promote gun-control legislation. One federal agent and countless civilians were killed with those guns.

The DoJ sought to remove a duly elected President -- even to the point of the Deputy Attorney General offering to “wear a wire” to record conversations with the President (with cabinet support).

The FBI really did set up some useful idiots to advanced their domestic terrorist narrative (the Governor Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping). It was a classic entrapment scheme in which federal assets planned the crime, and hapless stooges stepped in the trap.


All this is changing our worldview and is causing us to observe our government with a new level of skepticism.

The deaths of Vince Foster, Seth Rich, and Jeffery Epstein were rather politically convenient for the Democrats. Were they something other than two random acts of violence and one suicide?

COVID was created using our tax dollars in a Chinese lab, and caused a pandemic which affected the 2020 election. Was it really an accident committed by well-intentioned, but careless scientists -- or something else? Certainly, the Democrats didn’t let that crisis go to waste. Many thousands died. Were they just the broken eggs needed to make the make the election omelet?

A Chinese spy balloon was allowed to cross our continent and collect information from our most sensitive facilities -- apparently with the blessing of the Biden administration. But we’re told that the millions of dollars flowing from China to the Biden family had nothing to do with the President’s decision to leave the reconnaissance craft unmolested.

Two whistleblowers (Gal Luft and Alexander Smirnov) have come forward with evidence of Joe Biden selling government influence to foreign nationals. Conveniently, both have been arrested by the same DoJ which is setting a death trap for President Trump.


Things have changed a lot since the mid-20th century. The children of the 21st century have a completely different worldview.

- The United States is a corrupt and impotent international laughingstock.

- We’ve become technically stunted. Replacing the Francis Scott Key bridge is expected to take three times longer than building the Golden Gate bridge almost a century ago.

- Our cities are becoming unlivable post-apocalyptic hellscapes.

- “Living the American dream” is no longer a middle-class expectation.

- We know that fear of our own government is a prudent mindset.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doesn’t sound so crazy now that the conspiracies are no longer theoretical.
 

Biden admin caught colluding to build case against Trump, unredacted docs reveal.​

April 22, 2024 10:07 pm by CWR

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/bide...ld-case-against-trump-unredacted-docs-reveal/

As unredacted documents surface, revealing collusion between the Biden administration, National Archives, and DOJ to target Trump, questions arise about the politicization of justice and the integrity of transitions of power.
Key points:
  • Unredacted documents reveal collusion between the Biden administration, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and Department of Justice (DOJ) to build a case against President Trump.
  • President Trump’s claims about ongoing negotiations regarding document custody appear to be substantiated by the revealed records.
  • The unredacted documents highlight efforts by Biden’s DOJ and the NARA to initiate a criminal investigation against Trump, departing from normal protocol.
See also Dismissed Juror Describes Seeing Trump In-Person

See also Election interference via the back door undermines democracy. Vigilance against Big Tech manipulation is key to restoring fairness.


Source: thenationalpulse
 

Palm Beach prosecutor painted Epstein victims as prostitutes, grand jury records show​

Julie K. Brown
Mon, July 1, 2024 at 1:22 PM CDT·7 min read

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/were-secret-16-years-now-182222411.html/

c5244068b3c5bbb08ce48c99448dd07d

Uma Sanghvi/Palm Beach Post-USA TODAY NETWORK
A Palm Beach County prosecutor painted two girls molested by Jeffrey Epstein as prostitutes, drug addicts, thieves and liars in front of a grand jury empaneled in 2006 to review the state’s criminal case against sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, newly released court documents show.
Palm Beach County Judge Luis Delgado unsealed the controversial grand jury records on Monday after years of legal action by the Palm Beach Post and other media, including the Miami Herald, CNN and the New York Times. Grand jury records are normally kept under seal to protect witnesses as well as the integrity of the case. But in the years since the Epstein case was closed in 2008, the Miami Herald uncovered evidence suggesting that Epstein and his battery of high-priced attorneys may have exerted undue influence over the state attorney.
The records have remained under seal for 16 years. Earlier this year, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, prodded by state lawmakers and Palm Beach County Clerk of Courts Joe Abruzzo, signed a bill to release the files by July 1. The new bill provides for the records to be unsealed if the subject of a grand jury inquiry is dead or the investigation involves sexual activity with a minor.

DeSantis noted that making the records public might explain how the wealthy Epstein managed to “engineer an outcome that the average citizen would likely never have been able” to accomplish.
The records contain nearly 200 pages, including the testimony of two girls who were molested by Epstein, the New York financier who abused hundreds of underage girls at his Palm Beach mansion between 1996 and 2008. Epstein managed to escape serious charges, in part because the Palm Beach prosecutor at the time, Barry Krischer, elected to charge him with minor prostitution and solicitation rather than bringing a felony sexual assault case.
Read the Miami Herald series: Perversion of Justice
The Herald reported in 2018 that both Krischer and the lead prosecutor in the case, Lanna Belohlavek, told Palm Beach police that they didn’t intend to prosecute Epstein because they believed the girls were prostitutes and a jury would never believe them. But Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and the lead detective, Joe Recarey, both protested the decision, noting that there were multiple victims, some as young as 14, who were lured to his home under false pretenses. Reiter and Recarey went over Krischer’s head and took the case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, arguing that Epstein, who was in his 50s, was a serial sex predator who wouldn’t stop until he was put in prison.
“There was no reason to take this case to a grand jury in the first place,” said Spencer Kuvin, the attorney representing one of the girls who testified before the grand jury. “They had evidence of numerous victims to show that he was a serial sex predator. The only reason they gave it to the grand jury was to taint their own case and have an excuse not to prosecute.”

The grand jury and the girls​

The actual audio recordings of the daylong proceeding were not released to the public Monday. The Herald requested the recordings, but was told that they were not available. The transcripts also seem to be missing key elements that would normally be part of a grand jury proceeding. For example, there is no record that Belohlavek introduced herself to the panel, explained what the case was about or told the jury what they were supposed to do. There’s no closing statement summarizing the case or any documentation of what the grand jury ultimately decided.
What is clear is that Belohlavek painted an unsympathetic portrait of the two girls, both of whom came from broken families. One of the girls and her sister had been passed back and forth between parents and were taken to a school for troubled juveniles. The girl ran away several times before meeting a group of older kids, one of whom brought her to Epstein’s mansion.
She described for the jury how she was ushered into a large bedroom and instructed to strip down to her underwear. Alone in the room with Epstein, and confused about what was happening, she reluctantly complied. After he molested her, he gave her $200.
In front of the jury, Belohlavek asked the girl: “You’re aware that you committed a crime?”
“Now I am. I didn’t know it was a crime when I was doing it,” said the girl, who was 14 at the time. “Like, I — I don’t know. I guess it was prostitution or something like that.”
Belohlavek also asked the girls questions about their parents, and allowed members of the jury to make statements to the victims.
“Did you have any idea that deep inside of you that you — what you’re doing is wrong?” asked one juror.
“Yea, I did,” the girl replied.
“Oh do you?” the juror said, pointing out that the girl should have known better.
Asked another juror “Did it ever occur to you that he could have hacked you up?”
“Yes,” she stammered. “I thought about it a lot.”
Said the juror: “[You] should give it a little further thought.”
David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor, was astonished at the way the case was presented to the jury. He pointed out that the girls were under the age of consent, yet they were the ones treated like criminals.
“How is that not statutory rape?” he said of Epstein’s crime. “I can see how people think that a wealthy powerful man got away with abusing all these girls.”
Recarey, the lead investigator on the case, testified in detail at the proceeding about how Epstein and his assistants would recruit girls from local high schools, telling them initially that they were being hired to give him massages. While they were instructed to lie about their ages, many of them told Epstein their real ages and spoke to them about high school.
Recarey, who passed away in 2018, told the Herald in an interview prior to his death that he was frustrated by the state attorney’s handling of the case, claiming that Krischer and Belohlavek went to great lengths to discredit the girls — and failed to present to the jury the corroborating evidence that backed up the girls’ stories, including phone records.
Neither Krischer nor Belohlavek has ever commented on the case. The Herald was unsuccessful in reaching them on Monday. Both have since retired.

The years that followed​

Epstein’s case came under fresh scrutiny in 2018, following an investigation by the Herald into the secret negotiations that led Alex Acosta, the federal prosecutor who later oversaw a federal probe into the case, to approve a light jail sentence for Epstein.
Epstein would serve just 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail, where he was given liberal privileges to work in his outside office and at his Palm Beach mansion. After his release from jail, he continued to assault and abuse women at his homes in New York, New Mexico, Paris and on his isolated island off the coast of St. Thomas.
Epstein befriended a host of famous and powerful people, including former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Nobel-Prize winners, actresses, actors, hedge fund moguls and bankers. Some of his victims allege that he and some of his friends had sex parties with girls on his private island.
FROM THE ARCHIVES: Jeffrey Epstein arrested on sex trafficking charges
The Herald’s series led the FBI and US Attorney in New York to take another look at the case. He was re-arrested in 2019 on sex trafficking charges and jailed in Manhattan pending trial. He was found dead in his cell a month after his arrest. His death was ruled a suicide by hanging. He was 66.
His accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, 63, was subsequently charged in the case and convicted of sex trafficking charges in 2021. Maxwell, a British socialite who had a long relationship with Epstein, was accused of helping him recruit girls. She is appealing her sentence.
Kuvin, who came to represent nine Epstein victims, wasn’t surprised by how the jurors shamed his 14-year-old client.
“Think about this in the time frame this was happening,” he said. “That was the mindset back then. This is pre ‘Me Too’ movement. We have a come a long way as a society because of cases like this. We have matured as a society and hopefully look at this differently than we did back then.”
 

Former Snipers Agree: It’s A Miracle Trump Is Still Alive​

by ZeroHedge
July 16th 2024, 5:35 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/former-snipers-agree-its-a-miracle-trump-is-still-alive/

[see vids at site link, above]

"I'm glad they're calling him a shooter because he ain't a sniper ... If he was a sniper, President Trump would be dead on the very first shot. There's no ifs, ands, or buts about this."

One of the more interesting aspects in the flood of analysis on the attempted Trump assassination is the commentary by former military and SWAT snipers experienced in providing security details for political figures. Nearly all of them confirm that the Secret Service surveillance planning during the Butler, PA rally was perhaps the worst they have ever seen. It was so bad, in fact, that it almost appears as if the massive holes in the perimeter were deliberate.
So far it is not clear who specifically was in charge of the security plans for that event. However, many former snipers agree that it’s a miracle Donald Trump is still alive. In fact, they agree almost entirely with our own analysis published on July 15th.

RELATED: Video Graphic Shows How Close President Trump Came to Losing His Life

In an interview with KJRH in Oklahoma, former SWAT sniper Maj. Nate Norton of the Sapulpa Police Department lays out the scary reality:
“I’m glad they’re calling him a shooter because he ain’t a sniper,” Norton said. “If he was a sniper, President Trump would be dead on the very first shot. There’s no ifs, ands, or buts about this. This is somebody that has some weird, sick agenda and did at best mediocre train(ing) in my opinion. Because at 130 yards, 190 yards, that is piece of cake gravy range for somebody that shoots.”
https://www.givesendgo.com/savealex
The 140 yard shot gift-wrapped and handed to alleged shooter Thomas Crooks was so easy, even for an amateur, that Trump should not be alive today. The bullet, reportedly fired from an AR15 running 5.56 (or .223 ammunition), would have left a deadly and expansive impact wound had it been less than an inch to the shooter’s right. Here is test footage of .223 rounds impacting a realistic ballistic gel head for a visual reference:

Multiple experts in the sniping arena have noted that the miss might have been some kind of divine intervention. In the below interview, Republican representative and former sniper Cory Mills outlines his take on the attack on the assumption that the shooter’s range was 230 yards. Crooks was actually much closer.

RELATED: Inside Job? Rep. Tells CNN Trump Assassination Attempt Was ‘Intentional’

The explanation for Thomas Crooks miraculous miss might be found in reports that Crooks was, in fact, a verified terrible shot. Investigations into his school history indicate that Crooks tried to join his High School Shooting Club in Bethel Park, but he failed to make the shooting team and was asked to leave the club because he was incredibly unsafe with his rifle.
TrumpBullet1_0.jpg

In other words, Trump lucked out with the worst assassin possible. This does not take away from the fact that Crooks was somehow allowed to casually approach the AGR building and climb to the roof with a rifle only 140 yards away from the rally stage without any intervention from Secret Service. Crooks had every card stacked in his favor. Why was there no security on that roof? We are still waiting for answers.

MUST-SEE: U.S Rep. & Sniper Expert Says Trump Shooter Cleary Didn’t Act Alone— Inside Job


BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
 
Amazing footage of the attempt to removing Israel-first orange-man--Secret Svc KNEW Crooks was threat even before Trump began to speak!

 

Coming to America: Opposing Illegal Immigration, Climate Change, Or mRNA Vaccination To Be Considered THOUGHT CRIMES Punishable By Prison Time (Video)​

SD Wells August 21, 2024
3 minutes read

Link: https://conservativefiringline.com/...ought-crimes-punishable-by-prison-time-video/

thought



(Natural News) In overwhelming increments, communism is being installed in America, whether you realize it or not. It’s a war of attrition, and the communists are winning, and winning fast. Take a good look at what’s happening under similar governments around the world, because surely the USA is next, according to the commie formula for erasing democracy and the modern Western way of life.

In the UK, riots about illegal immigration are becoming the norm, and the aftermath is seeing the worst crime of all, as the government arrests people who simply comment on the riots online, saying something the government doesn’t like, that doesn’t fit the narrative that ALL immigration is fantastic, legal or not, so never complain (even if the illegals rape you or kill your loved ones).
If you say you’re thinking about protesting, you can go to jail in the UK. Don’t believe it? One man just got two months prison time for one post on Fakebook criticizing illegal Muslim immigrants that are “coming to a town near you.” Thought crimes are real, not just in the movie “Minority Report” anymore. Get ready USA, it’s about to hit here too, should the commies win in November.
Get ready to do prison time for simply THINKING about something the crooks in DC don’t want you thinking about. Now you know why they have fluoride in the drinking water, trillions of spike proteins in the Covid jabs, and lots of chemical pesticides on the produce. You must be really stupid to not see where this is all heading.

In Canada, if you criticize gender-bender ideology on social media, you must do time in a concentration camp called “reeducation training program” under Trudeau’s rule

Do you not understand how to communicate properly under communist rule? You will learn or suffer the consequences. The governing body for psychological practitioners in Canada is forcing a University of Toronto professor to undergo “reeducation” to learn how to support the grooming of children, perverting their minds, pushing them to get gender-mutilation surgery, and think about sex and sex partners all day.
Professor Dr. Jordan Peterson has been suspended in Canada, with no rights to operate as a licensed clinical psychologist, because the groomers in the UK government don’t like his social media posts. This is happening. The USA is next. Get ready should Kamilla the Hun and Nazi Walz win in November.
In New Zealand, during Covid, if you did not follow the “protocol” of lockdowns, social distancing, masking 24/7, and getting the horrid clot shots, you found yourself in prison. Now we’re seeing all the plandemic liars, including pundits, politicians and health “experts” trying to rewrite history overnight, and claim they NEVER told anyone anything was mandatory, it was all just “advice.” Talk about misinformation, disinformation, domestic terrorism and outright genocide. Let’s save America from the communist aggression that’s working from the INSIDE out. We can never forget what they did to us with this scamdemic apocalypse and stolen elections.

Are you engaging in “thought crimes” right now? Beware … artificial intelligence government is watching!
https://clck.mgid.com/ghits/2041626...cXC1LwXQDCOoqpbgAKKPQwxOYmF0lkhRvD81raHNJ4EAU
Keep your truth news in check by adding Preparedness.news to your favorites list and tuning in daily for updates on thought crimes being enforced for Americans who oppose the dictatorship in Washington DC, in collaboration with Big Tech, Big Pharma and Big Vax. #PlandemicII

Sources for this article include:
Related:
 

Trudeau Tells G20 That Fighting ‘Climate Change’ is More Important than Rent, Food for Kids​

by Anthony Murdoch | Lifesite November 20th, 2024 6:56 AM

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/trud...ge-is-more-important-than-rent-food-for-kids/

[vids at site link, above]

Trudeau criticized families for putting fighting 'climate change' at a 'lower priority' when they are struggling to 'pay the rent' or 'buy groceries,' insisting that 'we can’t do that.'

Trudeau Tells G20 That Fighting ‘Climate Change’ is More Important than Rent, Food for Kids
Image Credit: Anadolu / Contributor / Getty

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil (LifeSiteNews) –– After flying thousands of miles on the taxpayers’ dime in a government jet, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a G20 panel that fighting so-called “climate change” should be more important to families than putting food on the table or paying rent.
Trudeau made the comments while speaking at the Global Citizen conference at the G20 World Leaders’ Summit in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, on Sunday. He defended his government’s carbon tax, framing the increase in costs to Canadians as a necessary “priority.”
Speaking to the panel, Trudeau commented that it is “really, really easy” to “put climate change as a slightly lower priority” when one has “to be able to pay the rent this month” or “buy groceries” for their “kids,” but insisted that “we can’t do that around climate change.”

Trudeau then blamed the Canadian populace for speaking out against his carbon tax, saying “unfortunately, we have an awful lot of public amplification of the kind of narrative that is directly opposed to that,” referring to those who prioritize shelter and food over his government’s “climate change” tax schemes.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, a survey found that nearly half of Canadians are just $200 away from financial ruin as the costs of housing, food and other necessities has gone up massively since Trudeau took power in 2015.
In addition to the still-increasing domestic carbon tax, last week LifeSiteNews reported on how Trudeau’s Minister of Environment Steven Guilbeault wants to create a new “global’ carbon tax applied to all goods shipped internationally that could further drive-up prices for families already struggling with inflated costs.
Not only is the carbon tax costing Canadian families hundreds of dollars annually, the Liberals have themselves admitted that the tax has only reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 1 percent.
Trudeau’s comments at the G20 are no surprise given his government’s continued push of a radical environmental agenda continued in the the United Nations’ “Sustainable Development Goals” and the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset,” the latter being a globalist group in which Trudeau and some of his cabinet are involved.


BREAKING NOW: Putin Threatens Nuclear War By Christmas After Biden Launches Bombing Raids Inside Russia
 
Jewwy FOX News commentator & guests discuss how creepy Joe conspired to allow the Chicom balloon to do it's spying--all for a little moolah

 
Back
Top