This is EPIC, suckers: it's a PRICELESS snap-shot of our Jewwy society--what u get when culture is ruled by criminal "banking"/counterfeiting, suckers

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

The US Federal Reserve "Bank"--a (literally) criminal enterprise, legalized counterfeiting, suckers. These criminal frauds are thus given, by their little (political) flunkies whom they control, a MONOPOLY for the issuance of made-up, fake, currency (not real money, morons, which must be commodity-based, like gold/silver, necessarily finite in amount--see Mises.org; use their site search-engine for particular terms like "fiat-currency," etc.) which they just print-up, proliferate, and endlessly replicate, and also, nowadays, digitalize--and it's theoretically INFINITE in amount--that's why their candidates in any election ALWAYS out-fund, and out-spend any honest candidates who hope to represent the people--like Ron Paul, for famous example. Thus w. all this funding and lucre, they buy and control practically ALL the politicians and judges, the edjumacation, Hollywood, the Jews-media--EVERYTHING (for practical purposes). Anyone who seriously dissents is ridiculed, jailed, prosecuted, harassed, or, if nothing else works, and he/she is serious threat, ASSASSINATED--like was done to Kennedys, suckers--see Michael Collins Piper's "Final Judgment."​

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *​

Bill Clinton, Stephen Hawking At An Orgy, And Michael Jackson: Here's Who's In Unsealed Epstein Docs So Far​

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, JAN 04, 2024 - 08:12 AM

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/naming-names-infamous-epstein-list-set-wednesday-release/

Update (0855ET): Here's the list of names mentioned so far in the unsealed Epstein documents (of which there are many more to come). Their inclusion does not necessarily equal wrongdoing.

Bill Clinton - "He said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls."

Michael Jackson - One accuser was asked: ""Did you ever meet anybody famous when you were with Jeffrey?" to which she replies: "I met Michael Jackson" at "Jeffrey's house in Palm Beach." The accuser said she was not forced to perform 'massage' on the pop star (perhaps because she wasn't a 12-year-old boy).

Prince Andrew - According to accuser Johanna Sjoberg, Prince Andrew touched her breast while posing for a picture with a puppet of himself.
Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell
"And they decided to take a picture with it, in which Virginia and Andrew sat on a couch," she said, adding "They put the puppet on Virginia's lap, and I sat on Andrew's lap, and they put the puppet's hand on Virginia's breast, and Andrew put his hand on my breast, and they took a photo."
Alan Dershowitz - who has vehemently denied all accusations, but allegedly came "pretty often to Epstein's Florida mansion and got massages while he was there" according to accuser Virginia Giuffre.
Stephen Hawking - In addition to Sjoberg's evidence, there is an email from Epstein to Maxwell in which he says she should "issue a reward" to any of Giuffre's associates who can disprove her allegations.

"You can issue a reward to any of Virginia's friends, acquaints, family that come forward and help prove her allegations are false," writes Epstein. "The strongest is the Clinton dinner, and the new version in the Virgin Islands that Stephen Hawking participated in an underage orgy."
Hawking was photographed on Epstein's 'pedo island' in March 2006 as part of a trip to a nearby science conference.
Al Gore - Giuffre previously claimed that the former VP traveled on Epstein's carbon-spewing private plane. He has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

Bill Richardson - the former (and now deceased) New Mexico Governor, who Giuffre says was among those whom Maxwell directed her to have sex with.
Bill Richardson
George Lucas - Sjoberg was asked in May of 2016 if she had ever met or given massages to several other high-profile celebrities, including George Lucas, which she denied.
David Copperfield - Sjoberg said she also met famed magicial David Copperfield, saying that she observed him to be a friend of Epstein's.
Naomi Campbell - Who flew on Epstein's private jet, according to previously revealed logs from pilot David Rodgers. In 2019, Campbell admitted that she knew Epstein, saying "I was introduced to him on my 31st birthday by my ex-boyfriend Flavio [Briatore, the Italian businessman who has been convicted of fraud]. He was always front and centre at Victoria's Secret shows."
Kevin Spacey - Who Johanna Sjoberg denied meeting, but traveled to Africa with Bill Clinton on Epstein's plane in 2002.
Kevin Spacey and Ghislaine Maxwell sit on the Royal thrones
Donald Trump - who notably 'did not' receive a massage at Epstein or Maxwell's request.

* * *
Update (1858ET): The Jeffrey Epstein files have been unsealed. As expected, former President Bill Clinton is prominently featured - as John Doe #36 (for another good look at this - the first of several Epstein doc dumps to come, check out The Reactionary).

As noted by attorney and journalist Techno Fog of The Reactionary...
"Apart from the defendant [Ghislaine Maxwell] and Epstein, former President Clinton is a key person who can provide information about his close relationship with the Defendant and Mr. Epstein..."
What's more, Bill allegedly 'likes them young'...

One Epstein accuser also listed George Mitchell, Jeal Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Marvin Minsky, and couldn't remember the names of several other individuals.



We also learned that accuser Virginia Giuffre testified that she kept a journal filled with the names of men involved with Epstein, only to have burned it in a bonfire.

And who's not alleged to have gotten a massage from one of Epstein's girls? Trump...

And let's not lose sight of what Epstein's operation is speculated to really have been about...


A good summary:


Just the News has all the files here.
Live discussion:

As noted earlier, the documents include over 150 names which stemmed from a civil lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence on sex trafficking and other charges for participating in Epstein's enterprise.
As Axios notes;
Last month, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ordered most of the material within 187 entries listed under the pseudonym "J. Doe" be released after Jan. 1. in regard to the suit.
  • In part of that lawsuit, Virginia Giuffre accused Maxwell of facilitating her sexual abuse. The case was settled in 2017, though the terms were not made public at the time.
  • Preska also noted that anyone who may be named in the documents could file an appeal prior to the documents' release.
Developing...
* * *
Documents containing previously unknown names of Jeffrey Epstein associates are set for release on Wednesday, after a New York federal court ordered court documents unsealed, CNBC reports.

Over 150 people are reportedly named in the filings, some of whom have previously been disclosed as connected with the dead pedophile, who was found dead in a New York jail after being arrested on federal child sex trafficking charges.
"Things should start getting unsealed today," Edward Friedland, the district executive for that court, told CNBC.
The documents were filed in connection with a Manhattan federal court lawsuit brought by Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend and 'madam,' who recruited girls for exploitation by Epstein and pals.

Only Epstein and Maxwell have been criminally charged in connection with his longstanding abuse of girls and young women at residences in New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands and elsewhere. -CNBC
That said, Judge Loretta Preska granted a 30-day extension of the disclosure of several names, including a woman identified as "Doe 107," in order to review her claim that she faces risk of physical harm in her home country if her name is released.
675,1913,184

MORE POLITICAL STORIES ON ZEROHEDGE​



Philly Police Fired Their "Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Officer" This Week



More Blackmail: Thursday Epstein Dump Goes Deeper Into The Rabbit Hole



Potential Running Mates For Trump, Including 2 Wildcards


 
Last edited:

Glenn Beck: The FBI Director Has Epstein’s Black Book and Tapes, Therefore Far Too Much Power… Paul Joseph Watson Reveals the Jeffrey Epstein ‘Elephant in the Living Room’ [VIDEO]​

January 5, 2024 3:02 pm by CWR

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/glen...-jeffrey-epstein-elephant-in-the-living-room/

[several vids at site link, above]

Glenn Beck: The FBI Director Has Epstein's Black Book and Tapes, Therefore Far Too Much Power

Paul Joseph Watson Reveals the Jeffrey Epstein 'Elephant in the Living Room'

Epstein Victim Was Used to “Obtain Blackmail Information” on “Prominent American Politicians”
. . . Brother of Jeffrey Epstein Tells Tucker Carlson: Bill Barr Is Covering Up the “Murder” of My Brother [VIDEO]

Brother of Jeffrey Epstein Tells Tucker Carlson: Bill Barr Is Covering Up the "Murder" of My Brother

. . . Epstein Fixer Office Burglarized, Computer Servers Stolen Hours Before Document Dump

Epstein fixer Michael Sitrick told Los Angeles Magazine thieves broke into his Brentwood office over the New Year’s holiday and stole his computer servers just hours before a tranche of Epstein documents were unsealed and released to the public.

See also What's Hilarious About the Epstein Client List is That I Can Tell You Who's Not on It


Judge Loretta Preska on Wednesday unsealed the first cache of documents from lawsuits related to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse which potentially included names of over 150 people.

The first set of documents detailed Ghislaine Maxwell’s recruiting techniques, Prince Andrew’s abuse of the trafficked victims, and Bill Clinton’s fondness for “young” girls.

A second cache of Epstein docs was unsealed on Thursday.

See also Sanctuary City Denver to Spend Over TEN PERCENT of Its General Fund Budget on Illegal Aliens [VIDEO]
 

Epstein Victims File Lawsuit Against the US Government, Claim FBI Enabled His Sex Trafficking​

By Cassandra MacDonald Feb. 15, 2024 7:15 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/epstein-victims-file-lawsuit-against-us-government-claim/

Jeffrey-Epstein-1-600x315.jpg

A dozen victims of dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein have filed a lawsuit against the US government, alleging that the FBI enabled his sex trafficking operation to continue for over two decades.​

The victims, whose names are not public, allege the FBI had received tips about Epstein’s behavior as far back as 1996 but did nothing with the information.
The Hill reports, “A probe finally began in 2006, the suit says, but ended once Epstein pleaded guilty to a soliciting prostitution charge in Florida and was sentenced to 18 months in prison. The suit claims the FBI continued to ignore tips until Epstein was arrested on sex trafficking charges in 2019. He killed himself in prison months later.”
“As a direct and proximate cause of the FBI’s negligence, plaintiffs would not have been continued to be sex trafficked, abused, raped, tortured and threatened,” the complaint states, according to the report. “Jane Does 1-12 bring this lawsuit to get to the bottom — once and for all — of the FBI’s role in Epstein’s criminal sex trafficking ring.”

The lawsuit additionally claims the FBI had evidence of his continued crimes but refused to investigate further.

“During the FBI investigation, the FBI was complicit in permitting Epstein and co-conspirators to continue to victimize Jane Does 1-12 and other young women,” the lawsuit alleges. “The FBI had photographs, videos and interviews and hard evidence of child prostitution and failed to timely investigate and arrest Epstein in deviation from the FBI protocols.”
“The FBI had a non-discretionary obligation, governed by established policies, procedures, rules, and protocols, to handle and investigate tips concerning potential and ongoing underage child erotica, rape, sex with minors, and sex trafficking in a reasonable manner and to act against Epstein and to prevent him from committing repeated crimes,” the complaint continued.
“Yet, contrary to its own established rules, the FBI failed to take appropriate action and botched and covered up investigations for years.”
The lawsuit is seeking damages from the government.
Epstein was found dead in his prison cell in New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019.
Though his death was ruled a suicide by hanging, many have questioned that determination due to the influential figures that he could have potentially implicated. Among his alleged friends and guests at his infamous “Lolita Island” were Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton.
 

Johnson & Johnson Finally Admits: Our Baby Products Contain Cancer-Causing Ingredients​

Jun 24, 2019 Carly Fraser
Last Updated: Aug 13, 2020

Link: https://livelovefruit.com/johnson-johnson-baby-products-contain-cancer-causing-ingredients/

johnson & johnson baby products in pharmacy

You’re probably familiar with Johnson & Johnson family products. I remember using it as a child and well into my teen years. But what I, and many people to this day didn’t know, was that their products contain cancer-causing ingredients.

Although Johnson & Johnson labels their bath products as being “baby safe,” they have recently faced lawsuits and public outrage over their baby products and the ingredients they use.

Questionable Ingredients

The Environmental Working Group, a non-profit environmental research organization, describes the dangers of the ingredients used in Johnson & Johnson products. These ingredients include quaternium-15 and 1,4-dioxane.

Quaternium-15 is a formaldehyde-releasing preservative, and well-known carcinogen that causes burning sensations in the eyes, nose and throat; watery eyes; wheezing; nausea; and skin irritation. Daily exposure is linked with leukaemia and brain cancer.
In fact, the North American Contact Dermatitis Group considers quaternium-15 to be among the most clinically significant contact allergens in children.
Other formaldehyde-releasing chemicals used by Johnson & Johnson include DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and diazolidinyl urea.

1,4-dioxane is another carcinogen that causes vertigo upon inhalation, as well as drowsiness, headache, anorexia, and irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and lungs. It also causes skin irritation upon contact. This chemical is also a by-product of ingredients like PEG-100 stearate, sodium laureate sulphate, sodium myreth sulphate, polyethylene and ceteareth-20.

Public Outrage

Parents were shocked when a Missouri jury recently ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $72 million to the family of Jacqueline Fox, a woman who died from ovarian cancer that was linked to the use of talcum-based Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products.
Once the public became aware that these ingredients, and more, were lurking in their children’s soap and cream, parents wrote to the company demanding them to change their formulas.
In the U.S., no safety testing is required when companies are formulating new products. They’re allowed to put in whatever ingredients, and don’t even need to label every ingredient used.

As Stacy Malkan notes, “I worked with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, the coalition of health and environmental groups at the forefront of researching the ingredients used in personal care products. We sent hundreds of products to labs to find out if they contained compounds not listed on labels; many did…two years later, after we reported that Johnson & Johnson was selling formaldehyde-free versions of their baby products in Europe and other countries, the company announced they would reformulate their products worldwide to remove the ingredient and others of concern.”
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics urged consumers to boycott Johnson and Johnson until they complied.

The Response?

Johnson & Johnson responded:
“We have been phasing out the use of preservatives that release tiny amounts of formaldehyde to guard against bacterial contamination. These preservative technologies, which are used widely in our industry are all safe and approved in the countries where they are sold…Over the past couple of years, we already have reduced the number of formulations globally with these ‘formaldehyde releaser’ preservatives by 33% and in the U.S. by over 60%.
We are completing this reformulation as quickly as we can safely and responsibly do so. As part of the manufacturing process, we have extensive monitoring to ensure that the amount of a trace byproduct known as “1,4 dioxane” in any of our products is well below the level that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and regulatory agencies around the world consider safe.

…We have introduced new product formulations for consumers who prefer natural products, such as JOHNSON’S® NATURAL®, a line that is 98% natural, and contains no formaldehyde releasing preservatives or traces of 1,4 dioxane.”
Although their statement is promising, this new line of baby products is too little, too late, and cost twice as much as other products produced by the company. Would you trust a company to produce safe products, when they’ve been lying for decades? I wouldn’t.
If you take a current look at the ingredient lists on J&J products, they still contain ingredients that may contain harmful impurities that can cause cancer like 1,4-dioxane. Not only that, but these ingredients are still found in baby products.

What Ingredients Does Johnson & Johnson Still Use?

A quick search of Johnson & Johnson baby products shows that their products aren’t what they’re lived up to be.
For example, the following products contain these ingredients (these ingredients are up-to-date as of June 2019):
JOHNSON’S® COTTONTOUCH™ Wash & Shampoo: Water (eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate*, Decyl Glucoside, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Benzoate, Parfum, Coco-Glucoside*, Glyceryl Oleate*, Cotton*, Sodium Hydroxide, Ethylhexylglycerin, Tetrasodium Glutamate Diacetate*.

*Naturally-Derived Ingredient
JOHNSON’S® HEAD-TO-TOE® Wash: Water (Eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate, Glycerin*, PEG-150 Pentaerythrityl Tetrastearate, PPG-2 Hydroxyethyl Cocamide*, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate*, Sodium Benzoate, Decyl Glucoside*, Citric Acid*, Parfum, Ethylhexylglycerin
*Naturally-Derived Ingredient
JOHNSON’S® Calming Shampoo: Water (Eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, Decyl Glucoside*, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate, Glycerin*, PEG-150 Distearate, Citric Acid*, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate*, Parfum, Polyquaternium-10, Disodium EDTA.
*Naturally Derived Ingredient
JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME® Moisture Wash: Water (Eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate, Glycerin*, PEG-150 Pentaerythrityl Tetrastearate, PPG-2 Hydroxyethyl Cocamide*, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate*, Parfum, Sodium Benzoate, Glycol Distearate*, Decyl Glucoside*, Laureth-4, Citric Acid*, Ethylhexylglycerin
*Naturally Derived Ingredient
JOHNSON’S® Skin Nourish Vanilla Oat Wash: Water (Eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate, Glycerin*, PEG-150 Pentaerythrityl Tetrastearate, PPG-2 Hydroxyethyl Cocamide*, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate*, Sodium Benzoate, Glycol Distearate*, Decyl Glucoside*, Parfum, Laureth-4, Citric Acid*, Ethylhexylglycerin, Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Extract*.

*Naturally Derived Ingredient
JOHNSON’S® No More Tangles®Shampoo: Water (eau)*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine*, Decyl Glucoside*, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate*, Glycerin*, Lauryl Glucoside*, PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate, PEG-150 Distearate, Citric Acid*, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Methyl Cocoyl Taurate*, Polyquaternium-10, Parfum, Disodium EDTA.
*Naturally Derived Ingredient
Phewf! That is quite the list. But if you notice, many of these ingredients repeat themselves in every product (which makes me question why they have so many different lines, when the difference is almost nill).
Let’s take a quick look at some of these ingredients (those highlighted in red):

– Cocamidopropyl Betaine: a surfactant; it has been associated with irritation and allergic contact dermatitis, reactions that could be due to the ingredient itself or to impurities present in it, such as 3-dimethylaminopropylamine (1).

– PEG-80 Sorbitan Laurate: a surfactant and fragrance ingredient; may contain harmful impurities or form toxic breakdown products linked to cancer or other significant health problems, gastrointestinal or liver toxicity hazards (2).
– PEG-150 Pentaerythrityl Tetrastearate: an emulsifier and thickening agent; may contain harmful impurities like 1,4-dioxane and ethylene oxide, which are known human carcinogens (3, 4).

– PEG-150 Distearate:
an emulsifier and thickening agent; not easily absorbed by the skin but assists other chemicals to enter the skin barrier (so if other chemicals are present in the product that are not designed to enter the skin and bloodstream, then you’re putting your health in danger). Can also contain harmful impurities like 1,4-dioxane and ethylene oxide as mentioned above.

– Phenoxyethanol: preservative; linked to allergic reactions ranging from eczema and hives (5) to anaphylaxis (6). Also triggers acute nervous system effects in infants like vomiting and diarrhea (7).
– Sodium Benzoate: preservative; can cause organ system toxicity (8).
– Parfum: fragrance; the word “fragrance” or “parfum” on the product label represents an undisclosed mixture of various scent chemicals and ingredients used as fragrance dispersants such as diethyl phthalate. Fragrance mixes have been associated with allergies, dermatitis, respiratory distress and potential effects on the reproductive system (9).
– Sodium Hydroxide: denaturant; a highly caustic and reactive inorganic base. Causes organ system toxicity (non-reproductive), and irritates the skin, eyes and lungs (10).

– Ethylhexylglycerin: preservative; although generally considered safe, it has been found to be an irritant to the skin in two studies, causing allergic contact dermatitis: A Belgian study by the Department of Dermatology at the University Hospital and a study in the Contact Dermatitis Journal.

– Disodium EDTA:
metal chelator; clinical data indicates that disodium EDTA is not well absorbed by the skin, however, it has been shown to enhance the dermal penetration of other ingredients contained in a product. Thus, when combined with other harmful ingredients, may increase the chance that these ingredients get absorbed into the bloodstream.

– Glycol Distearate: increases thickness of a product to give it that pearl-like look; made from ethylene glycol, which is used to make antifreeze, de-icing solutions for cars and planes, hydraulic brake fluids, lacquers, resins, wood stains, synthetic waxes, and the like. Though small amounts aren’t likely to harm your health, it’s still doesn’t seem like putting a chemical like this (mixed with animal or vegetable fat) will benefit your skin, does it (11)?

Laureth-4: surfactant; laureth-4 is a synthetic polymer composed of lauryl alcohol and PEG (polyethylene glycol). Due to the presence of PEG, this ingredient may contain potentially toxic manufacturing impurities such as 1,4-dioxane (12).

According to these results, it doesn’t seem like these products are safe to use on children (let alone anyone). So for anyone asking whether their products are still safe to use, even though they got rid of a few hazardous ingredients…No. They are not.
You might have also noticed that some ingredients have an astericks next to them, meaning they are “naturally derived” – that doesn’t mean anything if the product is so chemically manipulated that it becomes harmful.

Not Only Johnson & Johnson

As a popular company, Johnson & Johnson is in the spotlight, however, many companies use harmful ingredients in their products, many of which you may use on yourself, and/or your children.
Common sources of exposure to harmful chemicals include baby lotion and shampoo, diaper cream, sunscreen, and other children’s body care products.
In fact, the Environmental Working Group states that over 82% of children are exposed every week to one or more ingredients with potential to harm the brain and nervous system. Not only that, but over 80% of children’s products that are marked as “gentle” and “non-irritating” actually contain ingredients linked to allergies and skin/eye irritation.
And while Denmark, Finland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Sweden and the U.K. have access to safer products, Johnson & Johnson still insists on providing American families with carcinogenic-laden soaps.

Going The Natural Route

My favourite motto is that if you can’t eat it, you shouldn’t put it on your body – especially a baby’s body.
A child’s skin is 30% thinner than an adult’s. This means that children can absorb up to 10 times more chemicals from bath products than their parents. This is why it is so important to only use products that chemical and toxin-free.
One of my favourite body moisturizing products is jojoba oil, a neutral oil that absorbs well and leaves the skin feeling silky smooth. Coconut oil is also great for helping get rid of rashes. Raw Elements also makes a sunscreen that can be safely used on children and adults.
If you’re looking for a natural shampoo, the one that I use is by Carina Organics. It is free of synthetic fragrances, petroleum, parabens, preservatives, propylene glycol, and toxins.
 

Jeffrey Epstein Had Secret ‘Panopticon’ Recording Room To Monitor ‘Guests’: Lawsuit​

by ZeroHedge
February 22nd 2024, 3:46 pm


Epstein allegedly employed a sophisticated system involving constant CCTV surveillance within his New York mansion.

In late 2019, Jeffrey Epstein victim Maria Farmer alleged that the deceased pedophile had a “media room” on the first floor where high-profile johns were allegedly recorded having sex with women and children.
“So if you’re facing the house, there’s a window on the right that’s barred – that’s the room, the ‘media room’ is what he called it,” Farmer said. “And so there was a door that looked like an invisible door with all this limestone and everything and you push it and you go in and I saw all the cameras.”
Maria said: “What it was – was like old televisions basically, like stacked.
“They were monitors inside this cabinet and there were men sitting here and I looked on the cameras and I saw toilet, toilet, bed, bed, toilet, bed.
“And I was like I’m never going to use the restroom here and I am never going to sleep here.” –The Sun

https://www.infowarsstore.com/catal...utm_medium=banner&utm_content=wintersunbanned
In 2020 a former jewel thief who says he had group sex with Ghislaine Maxwell but ‘drew the line at under-age girls’ claims he was forced to watch pedo videos involving ‘two high-profile US politicians’ and ‘two high society figures having a threesome with an under-age girl.’
The jewel thief, who goes by the name William Steel, claims that in the mid-1990s he met Epstein in the “upstairs room at a very high-end diamond dealer, the kind of place where only a few people are allowed in at a time.”
“I was there doing what I do. I was meeting my fence.
I saw Jeff with a young girl who looked only about 13 or 14 and he had his hand in the back of her shorts.
“That’s what first got my attention.
“She was so young and he was much older. That’s when I knew that he was dirty.
I had about 200,000 dollars worth of jewellery that I was getting rid of and later I struck up a conversation with him.
“He later said the girl he was with was his niece but I called bulls**t on that, telling him I saw what he was doing with her. –The Sun
Now, two women who have filed a recent lawsuit in Manhattan federal court are claiming the same. According to the Washington Times, the plaintiffs – Danielle Bensky and Jane Doe 3, say Epstein employed a sophisticated system involving constant CCTV surveillance within his New York mansion.
The two women say that Epstein and his circle of enablers collected compromising information in order to keep people quiet, and that the victims received monetary payments described as “hush money” following abusive incidents, or when they acted as recruiters to lure more young women and girls into Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.
The room worked like a panopticon, a circular prison with cells arranged around a central well from which prisoners can at all times be observed.
The lawsuit details that Epstein not only hired individuals to keep watch but also provided his victims with transportation and communication devices, purportedly under the guise of security and convenience while allegedly using these means to track their whereabouts.
“The Epstein Enterprise would not have existed for the duration it did and at its scope and scale, without the collaboration and support of others,” reads the lawsuit. “No one, except perhaps [convicted Epstein accomplice] Ghislaine Maxwell, was as essential and central to Epstein’s operation as these Defendants.
Why were Epstein and Ghislaine (daughter of a suspected Mossad asset) recording all of these people again? Mysteries abound.
And a reminder that Cindy McCain claimed “we all knew” what Epstein was up to.
 
Back
Top