There's natural-law limit to how stupid people can be, suckers--too much stupidity MUST result in DEATH, morons--"weak will fall by the wayside," scum

[Apollonian]

Shocking Truth behind COVID Vaccines: 52.5k Brits Died Suddenly in 8 Months in 2022 due to Vaccination with Official Data proving they cause a 5-Month Countdown to Death​

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON DECEMBER 26, 2023

Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/12/26/excessd-eaths-covid-vaccine-5-month-countdown-to-death/

---

As the death toll rises, a dark shadow has been cast over Britain.
Official data reveals that from April 2022 through to December 2022, 407,910 deaths occurred, with 47,379 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.
As the investigation deepens, it has become increasingly clear that the Covid-19 vaccines are the most likely cause of the unprecedented loss of life in Britain. The evidence is damning, with a startling correlation between the rollout of the vaccines and the spike in deaths.
We were told the vaccines would bring hope and healing amid an alleged global pandemic. But now, it seems that they have instead brought even more devastation and pain.

---

The Office for National Statistics has released weekly figures on deaths registered in England and Wales, and the most recent data reveals a troubling increase.
In the week ending on December 11th, there were 11,694 deaths, with 687 excess deaths against the 2016-2019 + 2021 five-year average and 999 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.
While Covid-19 is often blamed for such increases, this time the numbers tell a different story. Out of all the deaths, only 326 were attributed to the alleged disease – a mere 2.8%.
So what is causing this surge in fatalities?

Source
Meanwhile, according to Public Health Scotland (PHS), Scotland suffered 1,257 deaths in the week ending 27th November, resulting in 127 excess deaths.

Source
According to the Office for National Statistics, excess deaths have been occurring in England and Wales on a weekly basis since April 2022. To uncover the full extent of this tragedy, we dug into the data, analyzing the weekly number of deaths over the past six months and comparing them to the five-year average. What we discovered was a disturbing trend, as the chart below reveals.
As we delve deeper into the mystery of the excess deaths occurring in England and Wales, a disturbing possibility comes to light: the Covid-19 vaccines may be to blame.
According to the Office for National Statistics, excess deaths have been occurring on a weekly basis since April 2022, and while the data initially seemed to point to other causes, closer examination reveals a startling correlation between the rollout of the 2021 winter “Booster” shot and the spike in fatalities.
To uncover the full extent of this tragedy, we dug into the data, analysing the weekly number of deaths over the past eight months and comparing them to the 2015-2019 five-year average.

Source
The chart reveals a disturbing trend, with excess deaths occurring in all but two weeks since April 2022. These two exceptions, it turns out, coincide with the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee and funeral, which would have caused delays in death registrations due to the bank holidays.
But even taking these weeks into account, the data shows an average of 1,268 excess deaths every single week.
The following chart is taken from Public Health Scotland’s Covid-19 Dashboard, and it shows the weekly number of deaths compared to the 2015-2019 five-year average –

Source
Because the chart doesn’t reveal the true picture, we downloaded the death data from the Public Health Scotland Covid-19 Dashboard, which you can also do so here, and calculated the total number of deaths between week 16 and week 47 of 2022.
According to the data, there were 34,316 deaths during this period in the 2015-2019 five-year average and 38,611 deaths during this period in 2022.
This means Scotland has suffered 4,264 excess deaths against the five-year average over the past 34 weeks.
The following chart shows the overall number of deaths and excess deaths in England, Wales & Scotland –

The five-year average number of deaths in Britain over these 8 months equates to 360,531. Meanwhile, the total number of deaths in 2022 in Britain over these 8 months equates to 407,910. Therefore, Britain has suffered 47,379 excess deaths since the middle of April 2022.
Could it be that the Covid-19 vaccines, which we were told would bring hope and healing, are instead causing unimaginable tragedy?
Well, as our investigation into the excess deaths in the UK deepened, a disturbing pattern emerged.
An analysis of official ONS data reveals that approximately five months after each dose of the Covid-19 vaccine is administered, the mortality rates among the vaccinated rise significantly compared to the unvaccinated in each age group.
The following charts were created using data extracted from table 1 of the Office for National Statistics dataset on ‘Deaths by vaccination status (Jan 21 to March 22)’ which can be accessed on the ONS website here, and downloaded here.
The first chart shows the age-standardised mortality rates per 100,000 person-years by vaccination status between the 1st January 2021 and the 30th April 2021 –
Source Data
As you can see, mortality rates were highest among the unvaccinated each month. However, by the end of April 2021, five months after the first Covid-19 injection was administered in the UK, things started to even out among each vaccination group and the unvaccinated.
But look what happened in the following four months.
The first chart shows the age-standardised mortality rates per 100,000 person-years by vaccination status between the 1st May 2021 and the 30th August 2021 –
Source Data
The mortality rate among the vaccinated began to surpass the mortality rate among the unvaccinated significantly. By the end of August 2022, the mortality rate per 100,000 among the unvaccinated was the second lowest among each vaccination group.
Unfortunately, a follow-up report published by the ONS on 6th July 2022, proves that things did not improve for the vaccinated population.
In fact, things got so bad that by the end of May 2022, mortality rates were lowest among the unvaccinated in every age group in England, and highest among those who received one, two, or three doses of the vaccine.
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
A more detailed analysis of the data contained in the above charts can be read here,
But the pattern doesn’t stop there. The data shows that not only does this pattern persist in all-cause deaths, but each dose of the vaccine also causes a significant increase in Covid-19 deaths.
Between March and July 2021, the vaccinated accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths in England, with the one-dose vaccinated accounting for 66% of those deaths.
Source Data
The pattern repeated itself over the next five months, with deaths nearly tripling, and the two-dose vaccinated accounting for the majority of deaths at 83%.
Source Data
And in the five months between January and May 2022, deaths again increased, with the triple vaccinated accounting for the majority at 82%.
Source Data
The evidence is clear and undeniable: the vaccines have been and are still killing people, with the deadly consequences being fully realised approximately five months after each vaccination.
This is a tragedy of epic proportions,

 

[Apollonian]

Fully Jabbed California Records Highest Excess Death Count in U.S. History​

Link: https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/fully-ja...ds-highest-excess-death-count-in-u-s-history/

[see vids at site link, above]

January 4, 2024 Sean Adl-Tabatabai

California has officially recorded one of the largest ever excess death counts in America following the jab rollout in the state.

The Covid jabs have claimed the lives of at least 105,000 people since 2020. In that same time period, 82,000 more Californians died from everything else than is typical.

Adjusted for the decline in population, that non-Covid “excess death” figure becomes extremely alarming as the state has seen its population drop to about the same it was in 2015.

Infowars.com reports: In 2015 – obviously there was no Covid – 260,000 of the then 39 million Californians died. In 2023, not including November and December, 240,000 people died not from Covid (6,000 additional people died of Covid.).
Extrapolating the year-to-date figures for 2023 creates a final year-end figure of 280,000 – 20,000 more people than died in 2015. That’s a non-Covid, population-neutral jump of 8%.
In other words, despite the protestations of certain officials, the state’s death rate has NOT returned to “pre-Covid” levels – in 2019 the year before the pandemic, 270,000 people died with a population at least 400,000 greater than today.
Why?
Dr. Bob Wachter, medical chair at UC-SF and ardent supporter of tight pandemic restrictions, did not respond to an email from the Globe (away for work the auto-response said) but he did recently tell the San Jose Mercury News that in “(T)he last three years, not only were there a lot of deaths from Covid, there were a lot of additional deaths from non-Covid causes, which are probably attributable to people not receiving the medical care that they normally would have received’ when ERs were overflowing with Covid patients (note – the truth of that ER assertion has not been verified), Wachter noted.”

In other words, the pandemicist Wachter admitted the pandemic response itself at least contributed to a significant number of excess deaths, a fact that was aggressively and roundly denied and – if mentioned – led to censoring and societal ostracization (and in many cases job losses) by the powers that be during the pandemic.
A second admission along these lines was recently made by former National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins – Tony Fauci’s boss.
In this video clip, Collins – who once called for a “devastating takedown” (see above) of those who questioned the hard pandemic response – said his DC and public health blinders, well, blinded him to the problems his pandemic response caused and is still causing:

If you’re a public health person, and you’re trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is, and that is something that will save a life. Doesn’t matter what else happens, so you attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never might quite recover from. Collateral damage. This is a public health mindset. And I think a lot of us involved in trying to make those recommendations had that mindset — and that was really unfortunate, it’s another mistake we made.

Needless to say there is not even a half-hearted apology involved. And Collins is/was wrong in the approach to public health he apparently subscribes to, as throughout modern history it has involved a cost/benefit analysis and a weighing of the impact on society.
Public health, practiced properly, does not – and never before has – attached “zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never might quite recover from.”
“We had the exact wrong people in charge at the exact wrong time,” said Stanford professor of medicine (and one of the people Collins tried to “take down”) Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. “Their decisions were myopically deadly.”
To remind Collins of the ramifications of his decision beyond the excess deaths:
Massive educational degradation. Economic devastation, by both the lockdowns and now the continuing fiscal nightmare plaguing the nation caused by continuing federal overreaction. The critical damage to the development of children’s social skills through hyper-masking and fear-mongering. The obliteration of the public’s trust in institutions due to their incompetence and deceitfulness during the pandemic. The massive erosion of civil liberties. The direct hardships caused by vaccination mandates, etc. under the false claim of helping one’s neighbor. The explosion of the growth of Wall Street built on the destruction of Main Street.
The clear separation of society into two camps – those who could easily prosper during the pandemic and those whose lives were completely upended. The demonization of anyone daring to ask even basic questions about the efficacy of the response, be it the vaccines themselves, the closure of public schools, the origin of the virus, or the absurdity of the useless public theater that made up much of the program. The fissures created throughout society and the harm caused by guillotined relationships amongst family and friends.
The slanders and career chaos endured by prominent actual experts (see the Great Barrington Declaration, co-authored by Bhattacharya) and just plain reasonable people like Jennifer Sey for daring to offer different approaches; approaches – such as focusing on the most vulnerable – that had been tested and succeeded before.
Nationally, pandemic “all-cause” deaths spiked, for obvious reasons, but they remain stubbornly higher than normal to this day.
There could be mitigating factors to California’s numbers, specifically the issue of drug overdoses. Since 2018, the overdose death rate has doubled. The last overall figures available are from 2021 which showed 10,901 people dying of an overdose. While not specifically broken out for which drug, the vast majority are from opioid overdoses and the vast majority of those involve fentanyl. In 2022, there were 7,385 opioid-related deaths with 6,473 of those involving fentanyl.
But the overdose death increase would account for only about 25% of the total increase in “excess deaths,” meaning it has an impact but cannot explain the whole story.
There is also the issue of homeless deaths. Homeless people die at a far higher rate than the rest of the population and California has had a burgeoning homeless population for the last few years, despite the money being spent on the issue. However, at least a portion of that increase can – as with overdoses – be attributed to fentanyl and is therefore difficult to separate out as discrete numbers.
Those two increases, however, may explain the fact that the “all-cause” excess death rate for those in the 25-to-44 year age bracket (it has comparatively higher overdose death and homelessness figures) have remained – except for two very recent weeks – above the typical historical range.
The increase in overdose (and alcohol-related deaths) has been directly tied to the pandemic response previously. In California, there were about 3,500 more alcohol-related deaths during the pandemic response than before: 5,600 in 2019 (pre-pandemic,) 6,100 in 2020, 7,100 in 2021, 6,600 in 2022, and 2023 is on pace to see about 6,000.
That still leaves roughly half of the excess deaths unaccounted for, raising questions about the safety of the Covid shot (a shot, not a vaccine) itself. The CDC lists 640 deaths in California directly from the shot and an increase in “adverse effects” from the shot compared to many other actual vaccines. The Covid shot “ adverse” rate was one in a thousand, while, for comparison, it’s about one in a million for the polio vaccine.
That means a person was more than 9 times as likely to die from the Covid shot as any other vaccine and 6.5 times to be injured by it in some fashion.
Still that is – according to state figures – not enough to explain the increase.
There are three other issues to note: first, many of the counting questions are around dying “from” Covid versus “with” Covid remain, meaning the Covid death numbers could be elevated if the “withs” are lumped in with the “froms.”
Second, there is the simmering matter of “iatrogenic” deaths – i.e. deaths caused by the treatment. Early on in the pandemic response, a push was made to “ventilate” patients mechanically. From the above article (no caps in the original):

here’s an unsettling comparison: in NYC area, mortality rate for all COV ICU patients was 78%. in stockholm, the SURVIVAL rate was over 80%. this is a staggering variance. the key difference: ventilators. NYC used them on 85% of patients, sweden used them sparingly

Combined with the placing of Covid patients in nursing homes, the number of actual “only” or “natural” (for lack of a better term) Covid deaths, again, may be elevated.
The state Department of Public Health declined to comment on the matter.
Which brings us back to the Wachter and Collins oblique, nearly accidental admissions that the response itself may have caused significant and ongoing damage across numerous personal and public sectors.
Comparing California to other states also shows a concerning trend, specifically when considering the aftermath of the pandemic response. While increasing in population, for example, Florida’s excess death rate increase was/is lower than California’s as was its Covid death rate, a fact Gov. Gavin Newsom has been lying about for years.
During the pandemic itself, the nation saw an “all-cause” – including Covid – death rate increase of about 16% above normal. Using that metric, as it is clear the response itself had knock-on effects – California’s was 19.4% and Florida’s was 16.7%, despite the wildly different pandemic responses.
Imagine, if you will, you own a baseball team and you have two shortstops, one that earns $10 million a year and one that earns $1 million. And it turns out that both are equally talented – errors, batting stats, etc. – and that maybe the cheaper one is actually even a bit more talented it turns out. Which shortstop was the better deal for the team? The less expensive one, of course.
That is an apt analogy for states choosing how to respond to the pandemic – Florida cut the $10 million player while California kept him. In other words, the two states got the same-ish performance but at wildly different societal costs.
This pattern seems to be borne out by many of the figures. Obviously, various states that ended up lower than the national average took very different approaches: North Dakota and New Jersey saw roughly the same all-cause mortality numbers, as did Washington (state) and South Dakota.
This is true on the “high side” as well: California and Montana, Oregon and Arkansas are two pairs that had similar numbers with different approaches.
All of this raises a deeper question in that there appears to be little if any direct causative resultant difference between a draconian pandemic response and a softer touch.
And that should not at all be the case: the lockdowns, the masks, the shots, the social distancing, the closing of schools and stores and churches and parks, and everything else should have produced a clear and distinct difference – if the pandemicists were right.
If they were right, the difference in results should be stark and obvious to the naked eye. Miami should look like Genoa after the plague ships arrived while Los Angeles should seem like a New Eden. If the much-maligned Swedish “soft” model was as dangerous as the pandemicists said, Stockholm should be a ghost town.
But that’s not at all true and that’s why the pandemicists are/were so evidently wrong.: the harshest methods had little impact on the end results.
While there were differences between states, they cannot necessarily be directly tied to a specific policy construct (save Hawaii, which can be discounted considering their isolated geography). Hard or soft pandemic response, in the long run it didn’t seem to matter much in the Covid death tolls.
Where it did – and still does – matter is the immediate and long-lasting damage the more tyrannical responses had on society as a whole.
And – if California’s excess death numbers are an indicator – the pandemic response itself is still killing people.
And that, too, definitely shouldn’t be happening – if the pandemicists were right.
It is even more problematic – and even more ethically abhorrent – if the Covid death figures are inflated; the number of Covid deaths of 105,000 is only about 20% higher than the other non-Covid excess death figure of 82,000.
In other words, the net “from Covid” deaths may not be terribly different from the “from the Covid response” death count.
And that possibility is the most terrifying of all.

 

[Apollonian]

Well, when u're main-lining DEI and "woke" satanism into the previously Christian society/culture, how could disaster not be the designed out-come, morons? And golly, but does it take a genius to think to blame Trump for all the efficiency measures?

 

[Apollonian]

Doubt these "judges" are TRAITORS--they CONTINUE to push DEI & woke psycho-pathology, & their excuse is they're stupid--"woke."

 

[Apollonian]

Clown World: Two Men Face-Off for Women’s Championship Title at UK Ultimate Pool Event​

by Adan Salazar April 6th, 2025 5:32 PM

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/clow...championship-title-at-uk-ultimate-pool-event/

Just a couple dudes dominating women's sports.

Image Credit: infowars

A UK pool championship featured two biologically male transgenders facing off against each other for the Women’s title, a perverse example of how far trans insanity has gone.

Transgender players Lucy Smith and Harriet Haynes, both born men, competed for the Women’s Pros Series 2 Championship on Sunday, with the latter taking home the title and a prize of £1,800 (~$2,320 USD), while runner-up Smith received £900 (~$1,160 USD).

The Daily Caller notes: “The remainder of the top placements get 2,700 pounds, and that’s combined with 16 players total being paid. So in this case, the biological males will get the same amount of money as all of the 14 women they placed above.”

Ahead of the match’s outcome, OutKick.com explained the two men trounced countless females climbing the ranks to get to the championship:

Haynes finished the 2024 season as the top-ranked women’s player in the Ultimate Pool Pro Series and appears on the way to defending that title in 2025. Haynes also finished as the top-ranked player in 2022 and finished second in 2023. Lucy Smith finished sixth in 2024 and fifth in 2023.

Outkick also highlighted an interview Haynes gave to The Independent last December where he detailed his lawsuit against the English Blackball Pool Federation after it passed rules in 2023 banning transgenders from participating in women’s events, though it has not yet lifted the restrictions.

“I’ve never really considered myself a trailblazer. I’m just a woman who is trying to live my life, and all I want to do is just be treated the same as any other woman,” Haynes said, adding, “I work in an office environment and I’m treated like a woman every single day in the rest of my life. This is the only aspect of my life where I’m not.”

The two men competing in a women’s pool championship comes as a female disc golf player walked off of a tournament on Friday refusing to compete against a male transgender opponent, arguing the match was unfair.

“Females must be protected in our division,” female golfer Abigail Wilson told the crowd at the Music City Open tournament, adding, “This is unfair. I refuse to play.”

Meanwhile, despite the Trump administration attempting to curb males in female sports, a female fencer was disqualified and expelled from a USA Fencing tournament last week after she took a knee to protest competing against a biologically male trans opponent.

If things keep going this way, women’s sports will soon be nothing more than transgenders competing against each other after dominating female athletes.

 

[Apollonian]

Transgenders Outraged that Google’s YouTube May Embrace Free Speech on ‘Gender Identity’​

Link: https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025...ch-on-gender-identity/?utm_source=newsletter/

1,252

GERARD JULIEN/AFP/Getty

Lucas Nolan 7 Apr 2025

LGBT advocates are sounding the alarm after Google’s YouTube discreetly removed language protecting “gender identity and expression” from its public hate speech policy this year. The change could be a sign that the video platform is moving towards free speech on contentious issues during Donald Trump’s second term.

Google’s YouTube, the world’s largest video sharing platform, is facing scrutiny from transgender advocates after it recently made a subtle but significant change to its hate speech policy. The phrase “gender identity and expression” was quietly removed from the list of protected categories sometime between late January and early February, according to archived versions of the policy page.

The change, which came shortly after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, has prompted concern from LGBT advocacy groups, who say it removes clarity around protections for transgender and nonbinary users on the platform, according to the Advocate.

In a statement to The Advocate, a YouTube spokesperson downplayed the revision, calling it a routine “copy edit” and claiming that enforcement of hate speech policies remains unchanged. However, the company has not provided a clear explanation for why explicit mention of gender identity was scrubbed, and gender identity is almost the entire identity for leftist radicals in the transgender movement.

“The larger implications of YouTube’s actions should concern everyone,” a GLAAD spokesperson told the Advocate. “When a company, or political leaders, decide that certain groups of people are to be seen as less than others — it too often results in real-world harm.”

They noted that YouTube scored only 58 out of 100 on GLAAD’s 2024 Social Media Safety Index, in part because it lacks clear policies protecting users from targeted “misgendering” and “deadnaming.” YouTube is also the only major platform evaluated that provides little transparency on wrongful demonetization and removal of LGBT content.

Google has been extending an olive branch to Donald Trump after ruthlessly censoring him and his supporters for many years. One suspected reason is the company’s desire for the DOJ to lighten its attack on the company’s antitrust business practices. As Breitbart News previously reported:

Google Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker has publicly criticized the DOJ’s proposals, calling them a “radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.” The company also highlighted its work with the government in using artificial intelligence to combat cybersecurity threats.

During the recent meeting with DOJ officials, Google representatives argued that the company’s critical importance to the U.S. economy and national security necessitates a more measured approach to antitrust remedies. They did not, however, raise specific threats stemming from the proposed changes.

Breitbart News will continue to report on Google’s potential change of heart towards free speech.

 

[Apollonian]

White Brits will be a minority in the UK within the next 40 years, report claims​

By CIARAN FOREMAN
Published: 21:08 EDT, 3 June 2025 | Updated: 03:49 EDT, 4 June 2025

Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14777983/White-Brits-minority-UK-40-years-report.html/

[see vid at site link, above]

White British people will become a minority in the UK population in less than 40 years, a report has predicted.

The population of white British people will fall from 73 per cent to 57 per cent by 2050, before becoming a minority by 2063, the research suggests.

Professor Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University analysed migration, birth and death rates, and calculated that by the end of the century, the white British share of the population – those who do not have an immigrant parent – could have dropped to a third.

Read More

His report predicts a sharp rise in the proportion of the UK population made up of foreign-born and second-generation immigrants, increasing from below 20 per cent to 33.5 per cent within the next 25 years.

It also forecasts a near three-times increase in the number of Muslims living in the UK, suggesting that almost one in five people living in Britain will be followers of Islam by the end of the century.

By the year 2100, the report expects 60 per cent of people living in the UK to have at least one immigrant parent.

Professor Goodwin, a political commentator, said his research, which was based on Office for National Statistics and census data, will 'spark anxiety, concern and political opposition' among voters who wish to 'maintain the culture of the traditional majority'.

Research conducted by Professor Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University (above) claims that white Brits will become the minority race in the UK population within the next 40 years

The study into birth rates and migration levels has predicted that white British people will make up only 33.7 per cent of the UK population by the end of the century (Stock Image)

The report predicts a near three-times increase in the number of Muslims living in the UK, suggesting that almost one in five people living in Britain will be followers of Islam by the end of the century (Pictured: a general view of a mosque in Bradford)
TRENDING

Trump's four-word response on if he'll EVER reconcile with Elon Musk
11.6k viewing now

Single word that spelled end for Harry and Meghan in eyes of the Queen
37.8k viewing now

Sinister George Soros anti-ICE 'plot' emerges amid LA riots

He added: 'By the end of the current century, most of the people on these islands will not be able to trace their roots in this country back more than one or two generations.

'This raises enormous questions about the capacity of our country and leaders to unify people around a shared sense of identity, values, ways of life, and culture, and avoid the very real risk of us becoming what Sir Keir Starmer referred to in May as 'an island of strangers'.'

In the report titled 'Demographic Change and the Future of the United Kingdom', Professor Goodwin also warned of the UK's ability to 'absorb and manage this scale of demographic change'.

He said: 'What these projections show is that the UK is currently on course to experience enormous and historically unprecedented changes in the composition of its population.'

Professor Goodwin's projections were based on non-white ethnic groups having a higher fertility rate until the end of the century.

The fertility rate used was 1.39 for those born in the UK, 1.97 for foreign-born people. For Muslims it was 2.35, and for non-Muslims it was 1.54.

Official figures showed net long-term inflows were 431,000 in the year to December.

While this is less than 2023, when it stood at 860,000, it is still at historic highs.

Emigration rose by around 11 per cent to an estimated 517,000 for the year to December, up from 466,000 in the previous year.

People leaving the UK has returned to a similar level to the year ending June 2017.

There was a 49 per cent decrease in 2024 in the number of non-EU+ nationals arriving in the UK as the main applicant on a work visa, along with a 35 per cent fall in those coming as work dependants.

The number of non-EU+ nationals arriving as main applicants on a study visa dropped by 17 per cent, while there was a much larger fall of 86% in study dependants.

The drop is likely to reflect changes in migration rules introduced in early 2024 by the previous Conservative government, which included restricting the ability of most international students to bring family members.

Meanwhile, the government is failing to control the flow of migrants crossing the Channel, with 1,200 arriving on Saturday in what was labelled 'a day of shame'.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer even faced criticism from one of his own ministers who said control of Britain's borders had been lost as a surge in dinghy crossings overwhelmed French and UK border patrol vessels.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer even faced criticism from one of his own ministers who said control of Britain's borders had been lost as a surge in dinghy crossings overwhelmed French and UK border patrol vessels
The latest Home Office figures show that 1,194 migrants arrived in 18 boats, bringing the provisional annual total so far to 14,811.

This is 42 per cent higher than the 10,448 at the same point last year and 95 per cent up from the same point in 2023, 7,610.

It is still lower than the highest daily total of 1,305 arrivals since data began in 2018, which was recorded on September 3, 2022.

But the total of arrivals for the year, 14,811, is the highest ever recorded for the first five months of a year since data was first recorded on Channel crossings in 2018.

It has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year - and n 2024 the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9, reaching 14,058.

At Gravelines in northern France, more than half a dozen French police officers stood by and watched as migrants waded into the sea and scrambled on to an inflatable boat. French authorities said they rescued 184 people.

People hoping to reach the UK to claim asylum wade into the Channel to catch a dinghy piloted by several men
One of Sir Keir's senior cabinet ministers admitted the scenes were 'pretty shocking' as he said the UK had 'lost control of its borders over the last five years'.

Defence Secretary John Healey told Sky News that the latest crossings revealed a 'really big problem' - but insisted there was pressure being put on France for better co-operation and crackdowns ahead.

Britain had agreed a deal in 2023 to pay France £480million over three years to stop the crossings, including £175million in the current financial year – more than £480,000 per day.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp branded the latest Channel scenes 'a disgrace but sadly entirely expected' and 'a day of shame for the Labour Government'.

He added: 'It's a shameful failure by the French to discharge their duties to stop illegal migration. The French are failing to stop these crossings by illegal immigrants.

'Over a thousand illegal immigrants in a single day, boats flooding the Channel, Border Force stretched beyond breaking point, and even fishing vessels drafted in because our maritime rescue services are overwhelmed.'

Defence Sec John Healey admits Britain has 'lost' control of borders

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp branded the latest Channel scenes 'a disgrace but sadly entirely expected' and 'a day of shame for the Labour Government'
And Richard Tice MP, deputy leader of Reform UK, said: 'It looks like we pay hundreds of millions to give French police officers photography lessons because they are certainly not providing any security. Frankly, the Government should be suing the French for our money back.'

At least 18 migrant boats were seen leaving the French coast on Sunday, June 1, carrying more than 1,000 people - exceeding the previous daily record for 2025 of 825, set earlier last month.

Mr Healey added: 'Pretty shocking, those scenes [on Sunday]. The truth is, Britain's lost control of its borders over the last five years.

'The last government last year left an asylum system in chaos and record levels of immigration.

'But I think it tells us a really big problem which is that you've got French police unable to intervene and intercept the boats when they are in shallow water.

'We saw the smugglers launching elsewhere and coming round like a taxi to pick them up.'

 

[Apollonian]

WHO else could be "funding" these excrement-skins?--it's kikes, morons--WHO ELSE???? See, the currency (practically infinite) is controlled, manipulated by kikes, working through the Fed. Reserve (see Mises.org; use their site search-engine) "banking" (counterfeiting) criminal enterprise/fraud. CFR-Trilaterals, WEF, etc., are immediate powers, behind/around, these fronts fostered by oligarchs who hire these kike "technicians," as-it-were, to "run things," suckas. Selected kikes then, working for Israel/zionists, within these afore-mentioned satanist-globalists then take a good chunk of this fraudulent currency to hire strong leaders like hit-man, Trump who helps kill the Palestinians--get it?--see how it works? They just don't want u know it's kikes who give the orders, pretending some kikes are "good" "conservatives, etc.​

* * * * * * * * * * * * *​

It’s a Foreign Invasion! Karoline Leavitt Announces 330 Illegals Arrested for Involvement in LA Riots, 113 Have Prior Convictions: “Who is Funding These Illegal Aliens?” (VIDEO)​

by Jordan Conradson Jun. 11, 2025 4:45

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...sion-karoline-leavitt-announces-330-illegals/

[see vid at site link, above]

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt shows mugshot of illegal alien charged with attempted murder of a police officer after throwing

Molotov cocktail during LA riots – June 11, 2025
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Wednesday what we all knew: a large number of the paid rioters and insurrectionists are illegal aliens.

Leavitt told reporters during a White House press briefing that 330 illegals have been arrested for their involvement, 113 of whom already have convictions for crimes they’ve committed while living here illegally. One of these individuals, as Leavitt revealed in her opening remarks, was a Mexican national who faces charges for attempted murder after he hurled a Molotov cocktail at a police officer.

“Overall,” leavitt said, including American citizens, “there’s been 157 people arrested for assault and obstruction related charges, including the attempted murder of a police officer with a Molotov cocktail.”

The revelation came when Leavitt was asked for details on who the White House believes is paying the rioters in Los Angeles, who are well equipped for the mayhem they are causing, after the President announced an investigation into who is financing the insurrection.

WATCH: [see site link, above, top]

Reporter: The President said yesterday that paid insurrectionists were behind or involved in the protests in Los Angeles. Does the White House have any more details about who they believe is paying these protesters?

Leavitt: Yeah, the president, spoke about this last night when he returned from Fort Bragg because, frankly, the President has a lot of common sense. And if you look at some of the imagery that we have received from the Department of Homeland Security and ICE and law enforcement, who are on the ground, you will see boxes and boxes of very professionalized masks and rioting equipment being dropped off for these protesters. So it’s a good question the president is raising, and one we are looking into, about who is funding these insurrectionists and these rioters and these protesters and these illegal criminals.

And I have updates for you on the numbers by the way. Since June 6, there have been 330 illegal aliens that have been arrested as part of these riots in Los Angeles. 113 of those illegal aliens had prior criminal convictions, and overall, and this includes arrests of American citizens, there’s been 157 people arrested for assault and obstruction related charges, including the attempted murder of a police officer with a Molotov cocktail. So, who is funding these illegal aliens who are coming in with this very professional riot gear? It’s a question everyone in this room who cares about truth should be asking, and we encourage your help in trying to get to the bottom of that question.

Karoline Leavitt Announces 330 Illegals Arrested for Involvement in LA Riots

The rioters and looters in California are clearly well-organized and well-funded, likely by leftwing NGOs and foreign countries, as seen on Monday afternoon when a black pickup truck pulled up to a crowd of pro-illegal immigration with riot necessities, including face coverings.

President Trump announced during his speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday that his Department of Justice is investigating who is funding the insurrection and “they’re already on it.”

The President later told reporters on Tuesday, "Somebody is paying for that. I watched total professionals."

Leavitt said the President used "common sense" to draw this conclusion, which is supported by "imagery that we have received from the Department of Homeland Security and ICE and law enforcement, who are on the ground."

If a group is paying rioters and inciting an uprising to stop the federal government from carrying out its lawful authority, which is likely the case, the DOJ ought to bring charges for seditious conspiracy. It can be recalled that members of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers faced these exact charges in connection with January 6.

If they are funding foreign invaders and designated foreign terrorist gang members, the organizers should be charged with treason.

 

[Apollonian]

Councils covered it up. Victims were ignored. Criminals walked free. Now Starmer U-turns on the grooming gang inquiry he once called “far-Right.”​

June 17, 2025 9:22 pm by Alex

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/coun...ooming-gang-inquiry-he-once-called-far-right/

The British government has finally agreed to launch a full national inquiry into the grooming gang scandals that have haunted towns across England for over two decades. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, after months of resistance and public backlash, confirmed the decision on June 14, 2025, following the release of a damning audit by Baroness Louise Casey. The inquiry will be statutory, with full legal powers to compel testimony and evidence. It will cover England and Wales and coordinate a series of local investigations, even in areas where councils previously refused to cooperate.

This is not a new story. It is a long trail of ignored warnings, buried reports, and institutional cowardice. From Rotherham to Rochdale, from Telford to Oldham, thousands of young girls—many of them white and working class—were groomed, raped, and trafficked by organized networks of men. In many cases, the perpetrators were known to authorities. In many cases, the victims were not believed. And in too many cases, the officials who failed them were promoted or quietly retired.

See also Berkshire Hathaway just called it. The housing market has flipped. Buyers hold the cards. Sellers? Time to cut prices or get left behind.

The numbers are not vague. They are documented. The 2014 Jay Report found that over 1,400 children were abused in Rotherham alone between 1997 and 2013. In Telford, a 2022 inquiry estimated the number of victims exceeded 1,000. These are not isolated failures. They are systemic.

Baroness Casey’s latest audit concluded that previous efforts were insufficient. She reversed her earlier position and called for a national inquiry with statutory powers. Starmer, who once dismissed calls for such an inquiry as “far-Right bandwagoning,” now says he has “read every single word” of the report and will implement its recommendations.

See also Israel eyes Iran strike Trump deal ignored WWIII fears rise fast

This is not leadership. This is a forced correction. The government had previously launched five local investigations and insisted that was enough. It was not. Victims and their families demanded more. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK’s Nigel Farage both pushed for a national inquiry. Labour MP Paul Waugh joined the call after a grooming gang in his Rochdale constituency was finally convicted this month.

The inquiry will now proceed under the Inquiries Act, giving it the authority to compel witnesses and documents. It will also override local resistance. Councils and police forces that once refused to cooperate will no longer have that option.

The damage is already done. Survivors have waited years. Some have died. Others live with trauma that was compounded by disbelief and neglect. The institutions that failed them now face scrutiny, but only because the public refused to let the issue fade.


Sources

https://www.aol.com/news/keir-starmer-agrees-national-inquiry-170645913.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/17/the-daily-t-grooming-victim-father-dont-trust-labour

https://www.itv.com/news/2025-06-14/pm-announces-national-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-scandal

https://www.express.co.uk/news/poli...oming-gangs-statement-Parliament-Louise-Casey

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7872pngj2qo

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025...al-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-after-pressure



Israel’s stock market hits all-time high despite missile barrage while U.S. investors panic

Another “Iraq has WMD’s” bullshit.

 

[Apollonian]

Ho ho ho, this is great vid, not too long, just about right--and there are lots of other vids, longer & shorter, how da white lady went on notoriously "liberal" "View" program, knock urselves out watching & listening. I only want to note the real game behind the scenes: it's all Jew production & stage exercise or operation--whatever--for the entertainment & diversion of us dumb goyim. "It's Jews, stupid," Edgar Steele (RIP). What happened was simple, Christian female went in thinking as Christian--HENCE HONEST--which right there literally KNOCKED-OUT those creatures, niggas, a kike, a spic, and a couple of "liberals" who promptly went hysterical as typical liberals, and Karoline, dear lady, just sat cheerfully, but didn't hesitate to take issue (when there was one). Want chutzpah?--the kike immediately tried to make Karoline defensive about Christianity, seriously, etc. Yes, I too thought Jews were supposed to be "smart"--but at least she had chutzpah, seeeee.