The latest: Japanese CONFIRM, covid-vaxx cause ("triggers") "turbo cancers," destroys immune system

[Apollonian]

Japan: Covid Shots Cause Cancer​

Hunter FieldingApril 20, 2024

Link: https://newsaddicts.com/japan-covid-shots-cause-cancer/

[see vid at site link, above]

Japan has just issued an urgent red alert after a major study concluded that Covid mRNA shots cause cancer.
In a sweeping comprehensive study, Japan’s most prominent scientists found that deadly cancers are being “triggered” by the Covid injections to form and rapidly spread.
The researchers found that just one injection is enough to trigger a deadly “turbo cancer” in the recipient.
The alarming findings have led to the Covid mRNA injections being officially labeled as a “class one carcinogen” by the Japanese government.


An article published by world-renowned Australian medical practitioner Professor Ian Brighthope highlights the same Japanese study.
Prof Brighthope writes:

Today, on behalf of my professional friends and medical colleagues, I declare the mRNA vaccines to be class one carcinogens.
mRNA is also a broad-spectrum mutagen.
mRNA must be banned internationally.

He then went on to explain what carcinogens are, the process of carcinogenicity, and how carcinogens are classified before inviting readers to make up their own minds about how carcinogenic mRNA injections are based on the findings of the Japanese study.
Below are some extracts from Prof. Brighthope’s article but we encourage readers to read his informative article in full.

Carcinogens and Carcinogenicity​

Carcinogens are substances, organisms, or agents capable of causing cancer by altering the cellular, genetic, and epigenetic mechanisms within the body, leading to the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells.
These agents can be chemical substances, viruses or even certain types of radiation therapies used to treat cancer.
Carcinogens do not necessarily cause cancer in every case or under all circumstances.
Factors such as the amount and duration of exposure, the individual’s genetic makeup, and exposure to other environmental factors play a significant role in determining whether a person exposed to a carcinogen will ultimately develop cancer.
Moreover, not all mutations caused by carcinogens lead to cancer; only certain mutations in specific genes that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, and DNA repair may result in uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer.
The process of carcinogenicity, also known as carcinogenesis or tumor genesis, involves multiple stages where normal cells undergo a series of changes at the cellular, genetic, and epigenetic levels, resulting in abnormal cell division and the formation of cancer.

Classification of Carcinogens​

Carcinogens can be classified based on their mode of action into genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens.
Genotoxic carcinogens directly interact with DNA and/or the cellular apparatus, affecting the integrity of the genome.
Non-genotoxic carcinogens exert their effects through mechanisms that do not involve direct DNA damage.

International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) Classification​

The IARC Monographs identify factors that can increase the risk of human cancer, including lifestyle factors. Interdisciplinary working groups of expert scientists review the published studies and evaluate the weight of the evidence that an agent can increase the risk of cancer.
Agents are then categorized as carcinogenic, probably or possibly carcinogenic, or not carcinogenic to humans, based on the strength of the evidence.
The IARC Working Group also considers the body of evidence as a whole, to reach an overall evaluation of the carcinogenicity of the agent to humans.
The categorization of an agent into one of four groups is a matter of scientific judgment that reflects the strength of the evidence derived from studies in humans and in experimental animals and from mechanistic and other relevant data.
The four IARC groups are:

• • Group 1: Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity, the highest IARC classification for carcinogenicity. [Agents that are judged to fall into this category are also referred to as “class one carcinogens.”]
• • Group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans) or Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans): Limited evidence of carcinogenicity, a positive association.
• Group 3: Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity.
• Group 4: Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity.

World Cancer Research Fund (“WCRF”) and American Institute for Cancer Research (“AICR”) Classification​

The 2007 WCRF and AICR Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective report and subsequent tumour-specific updates are based on systematic reviews of the scientific literature for food, nutrition, and physical activity.
A WCRF and AICR Panel judged and graded the evidence into five categories: convincing, probable, limited (suggestive evidence), limited (no conclusion) or unlikely to affect cancer risk.

Decide for yourselves the level of carcinogenicity that characterizes mRNA​

After describing how carcinogens are classified, Prof. Brighthope invited readers to judge for themselves how mRNA injections should be classified by sharing the conclusion from the recently published Japanese study:

Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukaemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine.
These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive [Estrogen Receptors Alpha-sensitive] cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than covid-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.

The Japanese study confirms UK Professor Angus Dalgleish’s concerns about mRNA injections causing cancer.
More than a year ago, Professor Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist practicing in the UK, first published his concerns that his patients with melanoma were relapsing after several years of being in remission.
“I could find none of the usual causes but on further investigation, I realized that they had all had a booster covid vaccine between three weeks and three months before their cancer’s resurgence, the time in which their immune repression fails,” he wrote in The Conservative Woman on Monday.
After raising the alarm that the vaccine boosters could induce cancer relapse, he became aware of literally dozens of people who had not had cancer before developing leukemia and lymphomas after the boosters.
In November 2022, Prof. Dalgleish wrote an open letter to the editor-in-chief of the medical journal The BMJ, urging the journal that harmful effects of Covid injections be “aired and debated immediately” because cancers and other diseases are rapidly progressing among “boosted” people.
A few weeks later, he reported that other oncologists had contacted him to say they were seeing the same phenomenon of the recurrence of cancer in many melanoma patients who had been stable for long periods.
“Since pointing this out publicly I have been contacted by many physicians and patients from all over the globe saying that they are not only seeing the same phenomenon but also an increase in other cancers especially colorectal, pancreatic, renal and ovarian,” he wrote at the beginning of this week.
Many people had covid vaccines against their will, Prof. Dalgleish said.
“Others gave in to the bullying of the NHS and GPs who hounded them with texts and calls (which I myself received regularly) about the importance of having a booster even though they presented no evidence that it could be beneficial.”
Adding, “Having worked in vaccine development for a decade I remembered an adage that if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn’t work!”
In his latest article, Prof. Dalgleish highlighted several sources of evidence that have proved his concerns to be justified.
One source is the paper from Japan published this week.
“It was available on a pre-publication server last year but now it has been peer-reviewed and published in Cureus.
Titled ‘Increased age-adjusted cancer mortality after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the covid pandemic in Japan’,” he said:

The results are astounding. It shows there was a deficit for all cancers in the year 2020 when the first and second covid waves occurred.
In 2021 there was an excess of deaths of 2.2 per cent and a 1.1 per cent increase in cancers.
However, by 2022 the excess deaths had increased 9.6 per cent and cancer by 2.1 per cent.
This paper was completed and published before the 2023 figures release which will almost certainly be much worse. What is remarkable here is that we are talking mortality, that is deaths from cancer not incidence of it.
So what is the cause of this sudden increase? It is revealed in the title of the paper!

 

[Apollonian]

Heart disease risk skyrockets 13,200% following covid injections, CDC admits

06/21/2023 // Ethan Huff

Link: https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-21-heart-disease-risk-13200-percent-covid-vaccination.html/

The top two public health agencies in the United States conducted a joint study showing that the risk of developing autoimmune heart disease among the "fully vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is a shocking 13,200 percent higher than it is among the unvaccinated.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered that compared to the background risk in the general population, the risk of myocarditis is 133 times greater in those who took the mRNA injections from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna.

Researchers from several top universities and hospitals across America contributed to the study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Using data from the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the CDC and the FDA identified 1,626 cases of myocarditis, which were cross-checked to ensure the results comply with the CDC's official definition of myocarditis.

Based on this, researchers determined that the most high-risk mRNA jab is the one produced by Pfizer-BioNTech, meaning this one is the most dangerous in terms of potential health effects.

The Pfizer jabs, according to the data provided to VAERS, caused 105.9 cases of myocarditis per million doses after the second injection in the male 16- and 17-year-old age and sex demographic. In the 12-15 age group for males, there were 70.7 cases of myocarditis per million doses following the second shot.

The 18-24 male age group had the highest risk at 52.4 cases per million for Pfizer and 56.3 cases per million for Moderna. The median time to symptom onset was just two days for both jabs.

(Related: Another study out of South Korea found that myocarditis cases among the fully jabbed continue to skyrocket.)

Since VAERS only captures around 1% of vaccine damage, what is the TRUE risk of autoimmune heart disease following covid injection?​

As previous studies have found, the vast majority of covid jab-related heart problems, around 82 percent, occur in males. In the vast majority of cases, around 96 percent, those who became inflicted with myocarditis had to be hospitalized, and in most cases were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

By the time of discharge, 87 percent of those hospitalized saw symptom resolution, at least initially. There is no telling what these people might suffer as the years go by, especially into older age.

Among the most commonly reported symptoms are:

• 
  
• chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89 percent)
• 
  
• shortness of breath (30 percent)
• 
  
• abnormal ECG results (72 percent)
• 
  
• abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72 percent)

Recognizing the strong and undeniable link between covid jabs and heart disease, the CDC has commenced an active surveillance program for adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following these post-injection heart-related incidents.

Since the jabs have only been out since late December 2020, and really only started to get into people's bodies well into 2021, there is still no long-term data to evaluate concerning the long-term impact of covid jab-related heart disease.

The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) are both advising that people with myocarditis refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, otherwise they could die suddenly on the field.

Only after normal ECG and other test results start to appear should a person afflicted with covid jab-related heart disease even think about resuming strenuous exercise.

By the way, VAERS only captures as little as one percent of all vaccine-related injuries and deaths. So as shocking as these figures and percentages are, one must multiply them by a lot in order to gain a more accurate picture of the injury and death tolls from these injections.

Want to keep up with the latest news about the injury and death fallout from Operation Warp Speed? You can do so at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

WND.com

JamaNetwork.com

Newstarget.com

 

[Apollonian]

Cancer risk from covid vaccines; medicine regulators failed the public catastrophically​

BY RHODA WILSON ON APRIL 25, 2024

Link: https://expose-news.com/2024/04/25/cancer-risk-from-covid-vaccines/

---

Cancer occurs when mutations in DNA mean that cell growth is no longer controlled. The body has plenty of safety nets to minimise the risk of cancer developing but the accumulation of damage can reach a tipping point where cancer results. The balance can also be tipped towards cancer if the immune system stops killing the malignant cells.
The so-called covid vaccines can hypothetically contribute to that outcome in multiple ways. In the following, the HART group simply and concisely describes some of the mechanisms through which covid injections can tip the balance towards someone developing cancer.

---

Cancer Concerns: Why are people worried about cancer risk from covid vaccines?​

By Health Advisory & Recovery Team (“HART”)
The covid vaccines skipped safety testing for cancer risk. Pfizer said genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and biodistribution studies were “not considered necessary.” Even while their trial info sheet said: “Due to the urgent need for a vaccine against covid-19, with agreement from the MHRA, some of the tests usually required for a newly manufactured vaccine have been modified, in order to make the vaccine available more quickly for assessment.”
There are numerous reasons to be concerned about a potential cancer risk. Cancer occurs when mutations in DNA mean that cell growth is no longer controlled. The body has plenty of safety nets to minimise the risk of cancer developing but the accumulation of damage can reach a tipping point where cancer results. The balance can also be tipped towards cancer if the immune system stops killing the malignant cells. The whole process can take many years to develop but it needn’t.
The vaccines can hypothetically contribute to that outcome in multiple ways:

• Constant production of a mixture of foreign proteins will lead to chronic inflammation and potentially immune exhaustion.
• Modified nucleotides increase the risk of cancer.
• Spike protein damaging genes that protect cells from cancer.
• Contaminant DNA that can integrate into the recipient’s DNA and damage protective genes or else enhance growth-promoting genes.

Chronic Inflammation And Immune Exhaustion​

Many cancers arise after years of inflammation which increases cell turnover. For those who have continued to produce foreign protein, which will encompass a range of types because of frameshifting, this chronic inflammation would contribute to cancer risk. Where the immune system is overactive there may be immune failures which allow cancers to develop.

Modified Nucleotides​

The modified RNA used in the mRNA products had changes to the nucleic acids designed to shield it from immune attack. Researchers demonstrated using an animal model that the same changes suppress aspects of the immune system that are crucial for preventing cancer development and progression.

Spike Protein Effects​

Our cells are constantly carrying out essential work which prevents cancer. Two genes that are integral to that are p53 and BRCA1. In June 2020, it was shown that spike could hypothetically interact with those genes. The spike protein from the virus has been shown to inhibit this gene making cancer more likely.
In 2021 it was also shown that spike entered the nucleus and blocked 90% of the p53/BRCA repair mechanisms. This paper was retracted after 7 months, partly because it mentioned the “v” word. When the emails of the authors calling for retraction were requested they were denied to protect “trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential.”
The SV40 promoter region in the Pfizer vaccine also binds directly to p53.
Infection with the virus will have exposed people to spike protein (“spike”) but that would have been predominantly in the cells lining the respiratory tract and for a very limited time and in relatively small quantities. Moreover, vaccinal spike has certain differences from its viral counterpart, the significance of which isn’t fully elucidated. The same is not true for the whole spike proteins that were made by cells after vaccination.

How Long Did Spike Last After Vaccination?​

Manufacturers claimed spike expression would be short-lived. Pfizer stated: “In mice injected with the luciferase mRNA, the absence of expressed protein by 9 days after dosing indicates that mRNA has been degraded.”
Reality says otherwise. There are various ways to test. Most researchers use antibody-based testing but where spike is bound to antibodies the test will fail. Despite this, different approaches have demonstrated spike production for much longer than 9 days in the vaccinated.

1. There were 150 billion circulating spike proteins in 3 out of 13 participants at two weeks.
2. mRNA was found in blood up to at least 28 days when measuring stopped.
3. People injected with Moderna had platelets that produced spike for at least 40 days.
4. mRNA was found in lymph nodes up to at least 8 weeks when measuring stopped.
5. Spike protein expression in endothelial cells in the skin was shown at 3 months.
6. The blood contained fatty bubbles (exosomes) containing spike protein circulating at 4 months when measuring stopped.
7. In 2023, it was demonstrated that half of a group of 20 vaccinees still had circulating spike protein from 69 days to up to 6 months after injection, when the study ended. The authors proposed either that it was integrated into the cell’s DNA or that of bacteria in the gut which became a continuing source of spike protein production. None of the 20 unvaccinated healthy controls or 20 patients ill with covid-19 showed any circulating spike protein.
8. In 2024, spike protein was shown to be present in circulating white blood cells called monocytes in the vaccine injured, for at least 245 days after vaccination.

It is highly unlikely for even modified RNA to remain active for such a length of time. There has therefore been a theoretical claim that spike DNA has integrated into the human cellular DNA. Once in DNA it could then be continually and perpetually made into mRNA and from there into spike protein by a functioning cell apparatus.
Two problems emerge from this if it turns out to be true. First, the presence of spike itself would raise the cancer risk as described above. Second, the presence of spike for this length of time is indirect evidence of DNA integration. It is not clear whether that is integration into human cells or into, perhaps, bacteria in the gut. However, if it is the former that is a cancer risk because the integration itself could damage protective genes or enhance growth-promoting processes. DNA integration is also a cancer risk.

Direct Evidence of DNA Integration​

There is now practical evidence to support the claim that vaccine DNA can integrate into a cell’s DNA. It was already shown that the virus SARS-CoV-2 can, like certain other viruses, integrate into DNA which is why, after testing positive, healthcare workers have to wait 90 days for their mucosal cells to die off before testing again.
The vaccine has been shown to result in a vaccine sequence integrating into the DNA of liver cells in the laboratory within 6 hours. The authors believed this was due to the cell converting the mRNA into DNA first.
Kevin McKernan, a genomics expert, who has been instrumental in exposing the problems of DNA contamination and the true content of the sequences in the vaccine, has again been the first to carry out this critical experiment. He worked with Professor Ulrike Kämmerer to show that cells in a laboratory surrounded by vaccine not only had DNA integration but showed tiny mutations where the DNA has been passed on to daughter cells.

Risk Factors for DNA Integration​

The lipid nanoparticles were originally designed to deliver DNA into the nucleus of the cell for gene therapy. The specific lipid nanoparticles used predominantly delivered material to the cytoplasm. However, there was clear evidence that the nucleus was also entered which would increase the risk of DNA integration. But, small fragments of DNA would not result in continued whole spike protein production.
There are three parts of the vaccine sequence which would increase transportation to the nucleus, called nuclear localisation signals.
Finally, the fact the DNA was fragmented into numerous smaller lengths would also maximise the chance of DNA integration and present a higher cancer risk.
The risk of integration is highest during cell division so any cells that are already growing too fast in a pre-cancerous way would be most at risk.

Failing to Minimise the Risk in the Vaccines​

Kevin McKernan carried out critical work on the presence of DNA in the vaccines and he reported that his work has been replicated in Germany, Japan, France and South Carolina. The evidence was such that regulators had to admit to it but tried to downplay the issue claiming there was no functional consequence of this DNA without evidence to back that up.
In Kevin’s words: “After the regulators had admitted to being deceived they asked the opinion of the party that deceived them ‘how bad was the deception?’ They shockingly believed the answer they were given.”
The trial product did not have the same level of contamination because a “bait and switch” meant that the clean trial product was replaced by a mass-produced product contaminated with endotoxins – from the cell walls of bacteria used in production – and DNA. The pharma companies handed the regulator a genomic map showing the genetic sequence present in the bacterial DNA used as a template. This map was unlabelled from 6 o’clock to 11 o’clock. Kevin points out how odd that was. The annotation software that does such labelling would certainly have labelled a region of sequence which is an SV40 viral promoter and nuclear localisation signal which in McKernan’s words, “moves DNA directly to the nucleus within hours in all cell lines.” Someone must have deleted that label.
McKernan goes on to point out that the regulatory requirement for not exceeding a certain ratio of DNA to RNA in the product was obfuscated. Moderna patents show that DNA contamination was a real issue and that the standard quality control testing using quantitative PCR underestimates the problem. The companies shared with the regulator test results using quantitative PCR which underestimated the DNA levels and then a different test for the RNA to overestimate those levels and thereby hide the extent of the problem. Even with these cheats, the levels are more than ten times higher than the regulators’ limits. Based on PCR testing thresholds, the testing for DNA in the vials showed a million times more sequences present than the number required in a covid test to describe someone as a “case.”
There are good reasons to fear a cancer surge as a consequence of the mRNA vaccines. Those with long-haul vaccine injury symptoms are likely most at risk because of continuing exposure.
The regulators failed the public catastrophically with these novel products.

 

[Apollonian]

COVID19 vaccines linked to myocarditis, pericarditis, ITP, Guillain Barre Syndrome, Bell's Palsy, ADEM, PE, Febrile seizures & more​

That's the headline from an article by UCSF Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine Vinay Prasad MD MPH, not some "misinformation spreader." He's right.​

STEVE KIRSCH
MAY 06, 2024

Link: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/covid19-vaccines-linked-to-myocarditis?utm_campaign=email-post-title/

Executive summary
​

UCSF Professor of Epidemiology Vinay Prasad MD MPH just published an article entitled “COVID19 vaccines linked to myocarditis, pericarditis, ITP, Guillain Barre Syndrome, Bell's Palsy, ADEM, PE, Febrile seizures & more.”
In the article, he points out two major reasons that the study of 99 million vaccinated people under-reported safety signals:

1. Using electronic health records (EHR) will result in under-reporting of symptoms
2. The comparison rates were not age stratified

Prasad also says, “First, let us be clear, the benefit of COVID vaccination is small, uncertain or not present in several populations… absolute benefits to healthy people under 20, 30 or 40 were always minuscule— bordering on zero— and possibly not present. Available data lacks power to show a benefit in 20 year olds.”
He’s right about that too, but it’s even worse than he said. Much worse.
The study failed to recognize significant signals, and showed evidence that side effects were reduced by vaccination. How is that possible?!?

Zero benefit for all​

Professor Prasad should have said “the benefit is zero in all populations.”
I’m unaware of any population that can benefit from these shots. Someone show me. Please.

How can the study miss the huge Bell’s palsy signal?​

Secondly, the study appears to be incapable of finding a signal.
Let’s look at Bell’s Palsy for example.
The paper shows a mild signal: OE of 1.05 for Pfizer and 1.25 for Moderna.
But the signal in VAERS is off the charts: virtually every single case of Bell’s palsy ever reported in VAERS in the last 35 years is from the COVID vaccines.


If the mRNA COVID vaccines weren’t strongly causing Bell’s palsy at a higher rate than background, how can we explain this VAERS signal? Nobody wants to explain that.
I tried to engage Roger Seheult MD, founder of Medcram who produced a video on VAERS to explain data like this, but he blocked me.
The block was expected. That’s the way real scientists are supposed to respond to those who challenge their work: you block or ignore all challengers. You never respond because you don’t want to risk having someone make you look bad. It’s always better to leave bad information out there than to have to admit you made a mistake and have your reputation damaged!

How can the COVID vaccine reduce side effects? Is it a miracle drug? Or is the study flawed?​

Finally, it was also interesting to see that for the 3 vaccines tested, more than half the side effects studied had scenarios where the shots provided a statistically significant benefit:

1. Guillain-Barre Syndrome
2. Bell’s palsy
3. Febrile seizures
4. Generalized seizures
5. Thrombocytopenia
6. Idiopathic thrombocytopenia
7. Pulmonary embolism
8. Splanchnic vein thrombosis

Seriously?!!?! Vaccines don’t work that way. They always increase side effects. They never reduce them.
Yet, in this paper, in 8 of the 11 side-effects examined in the study Tables 3 and 4, there were one or more table rows (each row is a vaccine type and dose number) where there were one or more statistically significant reductions in incidence.
This does not inspire confidence in this study or in the peer-review process of the top medical journals.

Bottom line: A study showing statistically significant reductions in side effects from a deadly vaccine should cause anyone with a working brain to seriously question the study conclusions.

Summary​

A widely acclaimed study of 99M vaccine recipients showed statistically significant reductions in over half of the side effects studied.
That’s simply not possible. There is simply no mechanism of action that could account for such effects.
How these studies are taken seriously by the medical community is truly a mystery to me. That is what an enlightened press should be writing about: how the medical community embraces so obviously flawed peer-reviewed studies.

 

[Apollonian]

Biggest Study Yet of 99 Million Covid-Vaxxed Individuals Confirms Serious Side Effects — Doctor Says It’s Worse​

Sean Miller | Infowars
May 13th 2024, 9:56 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bigg...s-serious-side-effects-doctor-says-its-worse/

[vid at site link, above]

Biggest dataset yet offers insight into the horrific results of Covid vaccination.

The science indicates that Covid vaccinations are lethal injections.
The largest observational analysis study to date which investigated health outcomes following Covid vaccination confirmed a causal link between the shots and myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and more.
The study analyzed health data from 99 million patients and encompassed eight countries through the Global Covid Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project.

“This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified,” the study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.
The study utilized electronic medical records to compare the health of people prior to vaccination and following vaccination.
Doctor Vinay Prasad analyzed the study in a video Saturday.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/nitri...m_medium=banner&utm_content=nitricboostbanned
“This paper is an underestimate of the problem, in a number of ways it’s a deep underestimate,” he said, going on to list reasons why the study is an underestimate of the true harm from Covid vaccines.
Prasad discussed the findings of the medical study.
“And this paper shows very concerning safety signals across a number of domains including myocarditis, pericarditis, ITP, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bells palsy, ADEM, pulmonary embolism, febrile seizures and more,” the doctor said. “I think it suggests rather strongly that there was safety signals that have been ignored and under explored and that in many populations, particularly young people, particularly people who had already had and recovered of Covid-19 and for many additional doses…that the harms outweigh the benefits for vaccination in that age group.”

Prasad explained how requiring the vaccine for younger groups and the Covid-recovered were destructive.
“And that means that the mandates in those age groups were deeply morally problematic, they’re scientifically problematic and they bankrupt trust in public health,” he said.
Prasad went on to talk about specific brands of Covid vaccines causing high rates of various ailments, according to the study, then went on to discuss the harms they all have in common.
“Across the board the mRNA vaccines are causing heart damage seen in the form of myocarditis, you actually see concerning safety signals even for the adenoviral vector vaccines, but for things like Pfizer and Moderna, they’re off-the-charts bad,” he said. “And this confirms what we had already known.”
The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses, increase Covid infection rates, cause miscarriages as well as cause deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation.
The CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot, and that young children receive extra.

 

[Apollonian]

Study Reveals COVID Boosters Linked to Thousands of Nursing Home Deaths — And the Toll Is Rising​

By Baxter Dmitry and Dr. William Makis
Global Research, November 11, 2024
The People's Voice 20 October 2024

Link: https://www.globalresearch.ca/study...-linked-millions-nursing-home-deaths/5872419/

Elderly people across the globe were assured that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 would safeguard them from death. However, a major new peer-reviewed study has exposed the devastating betrayal: COVID-19 mRNA boosters directly contributed to the deaths of millions of nursing home residents worldwide.
Promised protection, these vulnerable populations instead experienced increased mortality after receiving booster doses, with the very intervention meant to safeguard their lives actually hastening their deaths.
The study by researchers Prof. Sourafel Girma and David Paton published in Science Direct exposes this disturbing reality, reveling that far from offering a clear and consistent benefit, COVID-19 vaccinations — particularly the boosters — contributed to increased mortality in these vulnerable populations.
Using machine learning to analyze vaccination data, the study found only a small, short-term benefit in two of three mortality measures among care home residents.
However, after the booster doses were administered, there was a significant increase in COVID-related deaths—a troubling finding that contradicts the vaccines’ intended purpose.
.

Announcement of the new research paper on X
.
The authors noted:
“In the later period, we find some evidence that higher vaccination rates are associated with higher Covid mortality.”
.

.
Even more alarmingly, vaccinating care home staff appeared to have a consistently negative impact on resident mortality.
Across all seven time periods analyzed, and for every vaccine dose given, the data showed that staff vaccinations were linked to higher rates of both COVID and all-cause deaths among residents. These findings were statistically significant with 99% confidence for the primary vaccine series.
This study raises critical concerns about the ongoing push for COVID-19 vaccinations in care homes, especially when the data increasingly shows no clear benefit—and in most cases, significant harm.
With no strong evidence supporting continued vaccination of residents or staff, the question becomes: Why are healthcare authorities still promoting these vaccines?
As is often the case, the mainstream media has remained silent on this issue, despite the growing body of evidence that calls into question the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in care home settings.
The Girma and Paton study is just the latest in a series of findings suggesting that the current vaccination strategy is not only failing to protect the most vulnerable but may be putting them at even greater risk.
The time has come for an open, honest dialogue about the true impact of COVID-19 vaccines on care home residents—and whether continuing this approach makes sense at all.

Comment by Dr. William Makis​

There was zero benefit from COVID-19 vaccines, even in the “high risk populations” for COVID-19 Infection: age over 70 and in a long term care home setting.
COVID-19 vaccines only hastened the deaths of those over 70.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Don’t Miss Out on Global Research Online e-Books!
Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People’s Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Featured image is from TPV

---

The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity​

by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin

 

[Apollonian]

‘Smoking Gun Bombshell’ Study Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Spiked with Cancer Virus​

Frank Bergman January 4, 2025 - 12:54 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/smoking-g...nes-spiked-cancer-virus/?utm_source=mailpoet/

[see vid at site link, above]

An explosive new peer-reviewed study has just sent shockwaves through the scientific community by confirming that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are laced with a deadly cancer virus.
The study documents findings from the analysis of Covid mRNA injections.
The analysis was conducted in the BSL-1 research facility at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s FDA White Oak Campus in Maryland.
The findings confirm that the mRNA “vaccines” contain fragments of the SV40 cancer virus.
In addition, the researchers confirmed that the shots have dangerous levels of DNA contamination.

In the “Abstract” section of the study’s paper, the researchers write:
“Using 4 vials of experimental mRNA vaccines, we found that two out of four vials of those experimental mRNA vaccines contained residual plasmid DNA that transformed Escherichia coli cells.
“We subsequently applied our method to assess 2 separate lots of Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and found no replication-competent plasmid DNA.
“However, these authorized vaccines do contain residual DNA to a level that exceeds 10 ng per dose.”

The study sourced the mRNA vaccine vials directly from the official National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) supply factory, the researchers noted.
They have found that “residual DNA levels” exceeded safety limits by 47,000% in some cases.
Further, cancer-causing SV40 was extremely present in the tested samples, to the rate of 500 billion DNA fragments.
In some cases, 23 trillion fragments of foreign DNA were found, enough for one for every cell in the human body.

And due to the methodology used, experts say this astronomical finding was merely a snapshot underestimate of the real contamination.
Leading experts have been reacting to the results of the study.

Kevin McKernan, former director of the Human Genome Project, called the findings a “bombshell.”
“Chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway could paradoxically fuel cancer growth,” McKernan explains.

“Repeated exposure to foreign DNA through COVID-19 boosters may amplify this risk over time, creating conditions conducive to cancer development.
“A more rigorous sequencing analysis could reveal SV40 fragments several thousand base pairs long, which would likely be functional.”
Professor of Immunology Nikolai Petrovsky declared the study a “smoking gun.”
“Clearly it shows the FDA was aware of these data,” Petrovsky said.

“Given that these studies were conducted in their own labs under the supervision of their own scientists, it would be hard to argue they were unaware.
“These students performed essential work that the regulators failed to do.”

Ironically, the stated goal of this study was to “report a simple method to detect residual replication-competent plasmid DNA that is present in mRNA vaccines as impurities” in order to “suggest that stringent and transparent monitoring of DNA impurity may aid in the buildup of public trust in mRNA vaccines.”

The study comes amid increasing warnings that Covid mRNA injections cause cancer.
A world-renowned professor of oncology has issued a chilling warning about Covid mRNA “vaccines” after concluding that the “evil” injections have triggered a global “explosion” in cases of deadly “turbo cancers.”
The warning was issued by Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, as Slay News reported.
Prof. Dalgleish, who is best known for his groundbreaking contributions to HIV/AIDS research, raised the alarm during an international forum of experts investigating the mass Covid vaccination campaign.
He warned that he has seen an “explosion” of deadly “turbo cancers” in his patients who have received Covid mRNA injections.

While addressing the Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International forum, founded by Dr. Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess, Dalgleish told the panel of experts:
“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s evil.”

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

Renowned Oncologist: 'Evil' Covid 'Vaccines' Caused 'Turbo Cancer' 'Explosion'


READ MORE – Renowned Professor Breaks Down in Tears While Raising Alarm over ‘Turbo Cancer’ Surge

 

[Apollonian]

FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer​

Frank Bergman February 13, 2025 - 12:56 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/fda-admits-covid-mrna-vaccines-cause-cancer/?utm_source=mailpoet/

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers.

The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.

As Slay News previously reported, leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.

Those warnings have now been confirmed in a bombshell study conducted in the FDA’s own laboratory.

Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found shocking levels of DNA contamination in the “vaccines.”

The residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory safety limits by 6 to 470 times.

While six times the safe limit would be alarming, 470 times is unprecedented and devastating.

The vaccine vials used during the study were sourced from BEI Resources.

BEI is a trusted supplier affiliated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), previously headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The findings of the peer-reviewed study were published in the Journal of High School Science.

The study finally shuts down years of dismissals by regulatory authorities, who had previously labeled concerns about excessive DNA contamination as baseless.

The FDA is expected to comment on the findings this month.

However, the agency has yet to issue a public alert, recall the affected batches, or explain how vials exceeding safety standards were allowed to reach the market.

The FDA researchers employed two primary analytical methods:

• NanoDrop Analysis – This technique uses UV spectrometry to measure the combined levels of DNA and RNA in the vaccine. While it provides an initial assessment, it tends to overestimate DNA concentrations due to interference from RNA, even when RNA-removal kits are utilized.
• Qubit Analysis – For more precise measurements, the researchers relied on the Qubit system, which quantifies double-stranded DNA using fluorometric dye.

Both methods confirmed the presence of DNA contamination far above permissible thresholds.

These findings align with earlier reports from independent laboratories in the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, and France.

Kevin McKernan, a former director of the Human Genome Project, described the findings as a “bombshell.”

“These findings are significant not just for what they reveal but for what they suggest has been concealed from public scrutiny,” McKernan said.

“Why has the FDA kept these data under wraps?”

In addition to genome integration, McKernan highlighted another potential cancer-causing mechanism of DNA contamination in the vaccines.

He explained that plasmid DNA fragments entering the cell’s cytoplasm with the help of lipid nanoparticles could overstimulate the cGAS-STING pathway.

The cGAS-STING pathway is a crucial component of the innate immune response.

“Chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway could paradoxically fuel cancer growth,” McKernan warned.

“Repeated exposure to foreign DNA through COVID-19 boosters may amplify this risk over time, creating conditions conducive to cancer development.”

Adding to the controversy, traces of the SV40 promoter were detected among the DNA fragments.

While the authors concluded that these fragments were “non-replication-competent” meaning they cannot replicate in humans, McKernan disagreed.

“To assert that the DNA fragments are non-functional, they would need to transfect mammalian cells and perform sequencing, which wasn’t done here,” McKernan stated.

“Moreover, the methods used in this study don’t effectively capture the full length of DNA fragments,” he added.

“A more rigorous sequencing analysis could reveal SV40 fragments several thousand base pairs long, which would likely be functional.”

McKernan has been one of the leading voices sounding the alarm over the cancer-causing DNA in the Covid “vaccines.”

As Slay News previously reported, McKernan issued a warning to the public last month after discovering traces of Covid mRNA “vaccines” in the rapidly developing cancerous tumors of turbo cancer patients.

Dr. McKernan, a genomics scientist with 25 years of experience in his field, made the discovery during experiments in his Boston lab.

McKernan gene-sequenced a cancerous tumor, matching the genetic sequence to Pfizer’s Covid mRNA injection.

The discovery is being hailed as definitive proof that Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause cancer.

“We’re in the stage where we’re scanning through tumors to look for integration events and looking for evidence of this in cancer biopsies,” McKernan said.

“And we can find them now.”

“They found one that had really high spike [protein] sent to us for sequencing.

“And we can find components of Pfizer’s vaccines inside this thing a year after vaccination.”

Immunology Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, the director of Vaxine Pty Ltd, described the findings from the new FDA study as a “smoking gun.”

“It clearly shows the FDA was aware of these data,” Petrovsky notes.

“Given that these studies were conducted in their own labs under the supervision of their own scientists, it would be hard to argue they were unaware.”

Prof Petrovsky praised the quality of work carried out by the students at the FDA labs.

“The irony is striking,” he remarked.

“These students performed essential work that the regulators failed to do.

“It’s not overly complicated—we shouldn’t have had to rely on students to conduct tests that were the regulators’ responsibility in the first place.”

The SV40 promoter is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression in eukaryotic cells by driving the transcription of genes placed under its control.

A growing number of leading experts have warned that SV40 is causing cancers to surge among the Covid-vaccinated.

SV40 has been linked to cancer in humans, including mesotheliomas, lymphomas, and cancers of the brain and bone.

The study comes amid increasing warnings that Covid mRNA injections cause cancer.

A world-renowned professor of oncology has issued a chilling warning about Covid mRNA “vaccines” after concluding that the “evil” injections have triggered a global “explosion” in cases of deadly “turbo cancers.”

The warning was issued by Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, as Slay News reported.

Prof. Dalgleish, who is best known for his groundbreaking contributions to HIV/AIDS research, raised the alarm during an international forum of experts investigating the mass Covid vaccination campaign.

He warned that he has seen an “explosion” of deadly “turbo cancers” in his patients who have received Covid mRNA injections.

While addressing the Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International forum, founded by Dr. Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess, Dalgleish told the panel of experts:

“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s evil.”

WATCH: [ck site link, above]

As Slay News previously reported, documents have also emerged showing that Moderna has always known that the pharmaceutical giant’s Covid mRNA shots cause cancer.

Last year, a world-renowned vaccine expert presented evidence during congressional testimony showing that Moderna knew of the cancer links.

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, testified during a hearing on Capitol Hill led by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA).

During his testimony, Malone presented the patent for Moderna’s Covid vaccine.

Moderna’s patent shows that its COVID-19 vaccine vials contain billions of DNA fragments.

Those fragments, along with other contaminants, are linked to birth defects and cancer, Malone explained.

In the patent, Moderna admits that contaminants in the shots cause cancer.

“Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines,” Malone told the hearing.

“And in that, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because of problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis that could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.

“FDA says they’re not aware of any concerns, but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA in insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity.

“So, Moderna knows it – DNA is a contaminant.

“It is left in because of the way they make it … they use DNA to make RNA, and then they degrade the DNA, and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA.

“And the process they are using is apparently not that good.”

WATCH: [see site link, above, top]

Now that DNA contamination of the mRNA vaccines has been verified in an official federal agency’s laboratory and published in a peer-reviewed journal, it is no longer possible to ignore.

READ MORE – Study of 2.3 Million: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Destroy Immune System [ck site link, above, top]

 

[Apollonian]

Leading Oncologists: ‘Turbo Cancers’ Emerge ‘All of a Sudden’ After mRNA ‘Vaccines’​

Frank Bergman | slaynews.com June 20, 2025 - 12:54 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/leading-o...ll-sudden-mrna-vaccines/?utm_source=mailpoet/

World-renowned American and British cancer experts are sounding the alarm on a “massive public health catastrophe” caused by Covid mRNA “vaccines,” and say the people responsible should be behind bars for “crimes against humanity” over their role in the “explosive” global death surge.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, an internationally respected oncologist and professor emeritus at St. George’s Hospital Medical School in London, is calling for an immediate halt to the use of mRNA “vaccines” in healthy populations.

Dalgleish, who co-discovered the CD4 receptor’s role in HIV and has authored more than 500 peer-reviewed studies, described the technology as “unbelievably dangerous” and said it “should never, ever have been thought of.”

The celebrated doctor has observed firsthand what he describes as a surge in “highly aggressive and rapidly progressing cancers” in patients who received Covid mRNA “booster” shots.

Dalgleish is among several leading oncologists who refer to this phenomenon as “turbo cancers.”

Doctors have revealed that some “turbo cancers” spread so quickly that seemingly healthy patients can die within a week of being diagnosed.

Oncologists are also warning that these aggressive cancers don’t respond to conventional treatments.

This phenomenon has been seen globally.

“I was the first to spot that my patients who were bullied into having booster messenger RNA [mRNA] viruses [‘vaccines’]… started to relapse,” he said.

Dalgleish detailed cases of long-term melanoma patients relapsing with metastatic disease within weeks of vaccination.

He also cited cases of healthy individuals, including two of his personal friends, suddenly developing advanced-stage turbo cancers.

One was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma, another with multiple myeloma.

He noted that they both suddenly developed turbo cancer shortly after receiving boosters.

“In 40 years of doing oncology, I’ve probably seen two explosive cancers,” he said.

“Now we’re seeing lots of them.”

What’s especially alarming, according to Dalgleish, is that these cancers have proven resistant to traditional therapies, including immunotherapies that usually offer high success rates.

In his published lab research in Frontiers in Immunology, Dalgleish reported that mRNA boosters led to a complete shutdown of patients’ T-cell responses.

T-cell responses are a key component of the body’s immune system.

He also warned of antibody-dependent enhancement, where antibodies generated by vaccines may bind to variants without neutralizing them, potentially worsening disease.

Dalgleish didn’t stop at the science, however.

He accused public health institutions of ignoring mounting evidence.

“Not a word,” he said, referencing what he described as the CDC, NIH, and other agencies’ silence about the apparent cancer link.

He went so far as to say:

“I basically think all these people I mentioned should be in jail…

“This is not just crimes against individuals or even a family.

“This is crimes against humanity.”

Dalgleish expressed particular concern about “stabilized synthetic RNA” and contaminants such as DNA capsids and SV40 promoter sequences, which he believes present severe oncogenic risks.

“This is no ordinary RNA,” he said.

“It is being stabilized… It shouldn’t even be considered for another human being.”

Across the Atlantic, meanwhile, leading American cancer expert Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a pioneer in immunotherapy and former UCLA faculty member, has made similar observations.

He described an alarming uptick in aggressive cancers, including a 13-year-old boy diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer and an increase in colon, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers among children and young adults.

“We’re seeing now 30-year-old, 40-year-old ladies, young ladies with ovarian cancer,” he said.

“I’m getting reports of that now… people that have been in remission before are now getting back cancers and very rapidly progressing.”

According to Soon-Shiong, both the virus and the vaccines may be responsible.

He pointed to immune system suppression involving T-cells and natural killer cells, which normally help eliminate cancer cells.

Soon-Shiong explained that persistent spike proteins from either the virus or the vaccine can impair these critical immune cells.

“COVID is oncogenic,” he said.


Dr. Soon-Shiong also criticized the mRNA “vaccine” design, warning that the shots may convert into DNA and continue producing spike protein long after injection.

He questioned the decision to target the spike protein instead of the nucleocapsid protein, which he believes could have offered long-term immunity and T-cell protection.

“The only vaccine that’s important is a T-cell vaccine,” he insisted.

He also accused federal health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, of interfering with research into safer T-cell-based vaccines.

Research from UCSF supports these claims, showing SARS-CoV-2 replicating in colon tissue up to two years post-infection and T-cell suppression, potentially contributing to tumor growth.

Dr. Soon-Shiong warned that the combined effect of the virus and the mRNA vaccines could be driving a new wave of immune failure and aggressive cancers, particularly in young people.

“You see young people with pancreatic cancer all of a sudden,” he warned.

“You see young people with colon cancer all of a sudden.

“Is it by coincidence that post-Covid infection, post-Covid ‘vaccine,’ we’re seeing all these events where we know the spike protein goes?

“I don’t think so. I think it’s not a coincidence.”

As concerns rise globally, both Dalgleish and Soon-Shiong are calling for immediate action.

They argue that Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA “vaccines” are fundamentally flawed, poorly tested, and responsible for a disturbing global rise in fast-growing cancers and deaths.

Given the evidence, Dalgleish and other researchers say it is scientifically and ethically urgent to issue black box warnings on mRNA “vaccines.”

Health authorities must also halt their use in low-risk populations until long-term effects are better understood, they warn.

READ MORE – Japan Issues Global Alert as Excess Deaths Surge Among ‘Fully Vaccinated’