The Coming Coup to Overthrow President Trump: Sedition at the Highest Levels By Paul Craig Roberts

[Apollonian]

Re: CONSPIRACY: Like CIA murdered JFK (RFK too), now killing Trump's character, prior to actual kill

The Coming Coup to Overthrow President Trump: Sedition at the Highest Levels​

Link: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49882.htm

By Paul Craig Roberts

July 19, 2018 "Information Clearing House" - The annual budget of the military/security complex is $1,000 billion. This vast sum is drawn from US taxpayers who have many unmet needs. To justify such an enormous budget a major enemy is required. The military/security complex and the media and politicians that the complex owns have designated Russia to be that enemy. The complex and its political and media agents will not permit Trump to normalize relations with Russia.

To prevent President Trump from reducing the dangerous tensions between nuclear powers that Washington has created, the military/security complex orchestrated Russiagate, a proven hoax, but believed by many due to its endless repetition. The military/security complex orchestrated the false indictments of 12 Russians. The military/security complex orchestrated the false arrest of Maria Butina, and so on and on.

The military/security complex acting through the politicians and presstitutes that it owns and controls has turned the normal everyday responsibility of the President—one acknowledged and acted upon by every previous president—to defuse tensions that could lead to nuclear war into a high crime. President Trump is accused of treason for trying to make peace!

An unaware person might think that this is silly and laugh, but as Finian Cunningham shows, President Trump has been set-up as a treasonous enemy of America. We are currently experiencing sedition at the highest levels as the military/security complex unfolds its coup against the elected president of the United States.

In 1961 President Dwight Eisenhower warned Americans in his last public address that the military/industrial complex was a threat to American democracy. Truer words were never spoken by an American president. Shortly thereafter, the military/security complex assassinated President John F. Kennedy for working toward peace with Soviet leader Khruschev. To get rid of President Nixon, who made too many arms control agreements with the Soviets and opened to China, the military/security complex used its asset, the Washington Post, to orchestrate the “Watergate crisis” that the military/security complex used to force Nixon’s resignation. Now the military/security complex is openly inciting sedition against the President of the United States. If this plot succeeds, which is the most likely case, America will be a complete dystopia and all independent voices will be shut down.

Who can Trump rely on? Not on his own political party. Not on his own government. Not on the print and TV media or NPR. Not on Europe. Not on the Secret Service. Not on the Pentagon. Not on the unaware American people. Trump has only the “deplorables,” and they are unorganized and will experience retribution once Trump is removed.

In striving to come to an agreement with Washington, Putin and Lavrov are butting their heads against a stone wall. Sooner or later Putin and Lavrov will have to acknowledge that. Once Putin and Lavrov realize the true situation, they will understand that war or surrender is their only option.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

 

[Apollonian]

Will the Deep State actually assassinate Donald Trump?​

Link: https://www.lifesitenews.com/analys...assassinate-donald-trump/?utm_source=popular/

---

One only has to look at Robert Kagan's recent unhinged rant in The Washington Post, in which he describes a Trump re-election as an America-ending apocalyptic event, to seriously wonder if the Deep State is actually considering the unthinkable.

Former U.S. President Donald TrumpBrandon Bell/Getty Images

---

Stephen Kokx
Sat Dec 16, 2023 - 2:45 pm EST

Listen to this article

0:00 / 6:48
1X
BeyondWords

(LifeSiteNews) –– The 2024 presidential race is not quite fully underway. But as it continues to draw near — the first GOP contest will be held in Iowa on January 15 — an increasing number of predictions are being made about what will take place.
For many months now Donald Trump has had a firm grasp on the Republican nomination. He has never not been more than 30 percent above the rest of the field. In fact, most polls show him to be around 60 percent while Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and Vivek Ramaswamy have each garnered around 15 percent.
Lawsuits filed by anti-democrat liberals aimed at keeping Trump off state ballots have thus far been swatted down by the court system. And while George Soros-backed New York Attorney Letitia James’s lawsuit has taken a lot of time, money, and energy from the former president, the likelihood that Trump will end up in jail as a result of it seems highly unlikely.

Calling on the Deep State to prevent Trump’s election?​

The inevitability of another Trump nomination — and possible electoral victory next November — is something Beltway elites are coming to grips with. Robert Kagan, the neo-con husband of liberal zionist Victoria Nuland, said as much in a recent column for CIA mouthpiece The Washington Post. Nuland is a bureaucratic parasite (what the media calls a “diplomat”) who currently serves in the Biden regime. Her primary job right now is to ensure yours and my tax dollars are funneled to Volodymyr Zelensky’s ever-widening pockets.
Kagan’s article is several thousand words long. It is Exhibit A of why he belongs in an insane asylum. It is an unhinged rant about how Trump will usher in a “dictatorship” if he ever gets re-elected, which, Kagan admits, is looking very possible. Kagan theorizes that if Trump wins the presidency he will “immediately become the most powerful person ever to hold that office.”
Kagan then ominously asks his audience — most of whom are probably intelligence agents — what they are going to do to prevent this from happening. “If we thought there was a 50 percent chance of an asteroid crashing into North America a year from now, would we be content to hope that it wouldn’t?” he wonders. “Or would we be taking every conceivable measure to try to stop it, including many things that might not work but that, given the magnitude of the crisis, must be tried anyway?”

A Trump election might result in “the loss of property and possibly the loss of freedom,” Kagan continues, apparently aloof to the fact that numerous Traditional Catholics, conservatives, and pro-lifers have been sentenced to jail time or had their homes violated during Joe Biden’s time in office. America is “closer to that point today than we have ever been, yet we continue to drift toward dictatorship, still hoping for some intervention that will allow us to escape the consequences of our collective cowardice.”
Kagan is skilled in the art of deception. What he calls “dictatorship” is actually, as liberals themselves so often say, “what democracy looks like.” A Trump re-election would not be “tyranny” but a reflection of what the popular sentiment of the people currently is. Simply put, if voters are fed up with Biden’s open borders policies, support for Ukraine, and awful record on domestic issues then they have the right to oust him. To describe that as an embrace of communism-light is to merely deflect from the kleptocracy Americans live under and have lived under for decades.
The most disturbing aspect of Kagan’s remarks is not so much his misleading characterization of what a Trump victory in 2024 would mean. It is his own response to the question, “are we going to do anything about it?” Again, Kagan argues that the court system, conservative media, and political leaders like Mitch McConnell have thus far prevented Trump from rising to the top of the GOP field. Only after pointing this out does he say: “We continue to drift toward dictatorship, still hoping for some intervention that will allow us to escape the consequences of our collective cowardice.”
It seems that what he is trying to say with the words “still hoping for some intervention” is to urge the Deep State to assassinate Donald Trump.
That Kagan would make such a brazen suggestion in one of the most powerful newspapers in the country speaks volumes about where the US is at the moment. Others have only speculated on this possibility. He is basically calling for it.

Are we being programmed to accept a Trump assassination?​

A possible Trump assassination has been raised by other political observers as well. Tucker Carlson told comedian Adam Carolla in August he thinks it is a real possibility. “If you begin with criticism, then you go to protest, then you go to impeachment, now you go to indictment and none of them work. What’s next? Graph it out, man,” he said. “We’re speeding towards assassination, obviously… They have decided — permanent Washington, both parties have decided — that there’s something about Trump that’s so threatening to them, they just can’t have him.”
Carlson asked Trump about this himself. Trump simply responded by saying “they’re savage animals. They are people that are sick.”
Alex Jones, the founder of InfoWars, likewise told Carlson that assassination is the next logical step because Trump cannot be stopped.
“The Deep State does kill people. And that’s their only next move,” he predicted earlier this month.
There are two ways to think about these prognostications. One way is to view them as nothing more than the informed opinions of pundits who are familiar with the way politics and the Deep State operate. Another way is to understand them as a sort of programming tool meant to telegraph what is to come. Of course, that outlook would require one to view Carlson, Jones, as well as Kagan, of being, at least in some way, different wings of the same cabal that influences public opinion at the behest of a small group of powerful puppeteers. Is that what’s happening here? Maybe.
If Trump were to be assassinated, the America First movement would be without its leader. Having been decapitated, it would likely flail about until breaking into various factions. Who would benefit from that? Quite obviously the establishment wing of the Republican Party, especially the military industrial complex, which has been rallying behind Nikki Haley in her 2024 presidential race.
If Trump somehow does make it to election day alive — and ends up winning — my guess is the Deep State will never forgive him (or the American people) for putting him back in the Oval Office. At that point they would be emboldened to take revenge by collapsing the entire country with false flags, energy grid attacks, and sowing domestic chaos that ultimately leads to civil war. I hope I am wrong about that and that our prayers will prevent such wicked plans from being realized. But perhaps that is what Americans deserve for mocking God with all the sins they allow to take place in their country. If ever there was a time to put our trust in God and not in men, now is that time.

 

[Apollonian]

.

Ramaswamy On Fire: If Deep State Willing to Stage ‘Insurrection’ to Take Down Political Opponents, They Can Do Anything​

Infowars.com
December 27th 2023, 5:35 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/rama...own-political-opponents-they-can-do-anything/

Republican presidential candidate strikes back at Deep State's Jan. 6 narrative.

'If you’d have told me nearly 3 years ago when I was just a CEO that Jan. 6 was an inside job, I would’ve said that’s crazy talk...It’s not.'

GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy took aim at the Deep State Wednesday, calling out the Jan. 6 “insurrection” narrative as a manufactured hoax being used as a political weapon to bludgeon former President Donald Trump.

In a fiery post on X, the former businessman called Jan. 6 an “inside job,” and excoriated the FBI over its failure to reveal how many agents and informants were among the crowd that day.

“If you’d have told me nearly 3 years ago when I was just a CEO that Jan. 6 was an inside job, I would’ve said that’s crazy talk,” Ramaswamy wrote, adding, “It’s not.”

If you’d have told me nearly 3 years ago when I was just a CEO that Jan. 6 was an inside job, I would’ve said that’s crazy talk. It’s not. There is now clear evidence that there was at the very least entrapment of peaceful protestors, similar to the fake Gretchen Whitmer…
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) December 27, 2023

“There is now clear evidence that there was at the very least entrapment of peaceful protesters, similar to the fake Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot & countless other cases. The FBI won’t admit how many undercover officers were in the field on Jan 6, Capitol police on one hand fired rubber bullets & explosives into a peaceful crowd who they then willingly later allowed to enter the Capitol.”
https://www.givesendgo.com/savealex

J6: A True Timeline

Thousands of crowdsourced video files. Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage. Dozens of police officer body cams. One True Timeline.

Do you know the whole story of January 6th?

Find out what really happened: 01/01/2024 https://t.co/PA4iQCrSxD #J6TrueTimeline pic.twitter.com/6IDXMTNLDR
— J6: A True Timeline (@J6TrueTimeline) December 26, 2023

Ramaswamy went on to note the inherent danger in allowing the corrupt Deep State to continue shaping the Jan. 6 narrative:

“That doesn’t add up & the actual evidence turns the prior narrative upside down: if the deep state is willing to manufacture an ‘insurrection’ to take down its political opponents, they can do anything. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.”


Unedited footage from inside the Capitol on Jan. 6 released last month by House Speaker Mike Johnson showed Capitol Police officers gleefully shaking hands with, fist-bumping and leading protesters through the halls of the building, devastating violent “insurrection” claims.

Ramaswamy previously took the opportunity to expose the J6 inside job on stage during the fourth GOP debate earlier this month, where he also highlighted the United Nations’ Great Replacement Theory, and touched on the 2020 election being stolen.

Vivek: "The Great Replacement Theory is not some grand right-wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic party's platform." pic.twitter.com/YUdQGDAvo5
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) December 7, 2023

“Why am I the only person on this stage, at least, who can say that Jan. 6 now does look like it was an inside job?” Ramaswamy said at one point during the debate, prompting cheers from the audience.

The pro-Trump candidate’s warning comes as special counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday requested that a Washington D.C. court exclude evidence related to the January 6 riot from the jury in his case against Donald Trump, arguing the former president shouldn’t be allowed to make “irrelevant” claims blaming January 6 on others.

 

[Apollonian]

Rep. Clay Higgins: The FBI lured Americans into a January 6 trap​

By Andrea Widburg

Link: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...i_lured_americans_into_a_january_6_trap.html/

On January 6, 2024, the drive-by media went into overdrive, remembering (sometimes while oozing crocodile tears) the horrors of January 6, 2021. It was, they said, the day on which democracy was under attack. It seems that they may be right, although they’ve gotten their facts bass-ackwards. According to Rep. Clay Higgins (R. LA), who has been investigating what actually happened that day, when one deletes the layers of leftist propaganda, it appears that January 6 was a giant entrapment web that successfully stopped official challenges to election certification, made Trump even more toxic and, worst of all, turned his law-abiding supporters into criminals.
For the last three years, Biden’s “Justice” Department has been viciously prosecuting more than a thousand Americans for entering the U.S. Capitol on January 6. The DOJ did this even though (a) most were inside involuntarily, as the press of the crowd swept them in whether they wanted to be there or not; (b) the Capitol police opened the doors to them (indeed, it seems they could only be opened from the inside); and (c) 99.9% of them, once innocently inside the Capitol, did nothing but wander through as tourists. (Here’s a good rundown of many of the other incontrovertible facts we know about January 6.)

The sentences brought down on people caught on January 6 have been horrific.

The administration, though, isn’t done. Matthew Graves, one of the January 6 prosecutors, held a press conference on Saturday (the three-year anniversary of January 6) to announce that the DOJ will now go after anyone who was outside the Capitol on January 6 if they can be proven to have “knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization.” He believes that this will target “thousands of people occupied in the area that they were not authorized to be present in the first place.” (Emphasis mine.)
Think about that: In a crowd that size, people often have no control over where they are, as they are swept along like flotsam on a vast ocean. Their control over their whereabouts would have lessened even more when a police officer fired into the crowd without first demanding they disperse, sparking a panic. It’s also questionable whether the new arrestees will know—or be given the chance to show at any trial—that strangely determined operatives removed signs and fencing identifying restricted areas.

And speaking of strangely determined operatives, Rep. Clay Higgins, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, made some interesting claims. According to Higgins, FBI operatives entrapped people, both in the lead-up to January 6 and on January 6 itself. They encouraged violence (shades of the FBI-planned attack on Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer), and they had a huge presence on January 6 itself, during which they may have led people into and through the Capitol.
Regarding the entrapment, Higgins states:

The FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression. Those Americans were targeted by the FBI—almost universally Republicans and largely Trump supporters. But the FBI worked undercover and infiltrated those conversations and [had] become a significant part of those individual Americans’ communications.
And when you dig into the evidence that we've had revealed through some criminal cases that I've followed and worked with in families of J6 political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in the capital that day, some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of a suggestions of a more radical occupation of the capital.
They were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the origins of those conversations, they were started by the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group.
And then months later, on January 4th, 5th, and 6th, any of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to everything that had happened during 2020—the COVID oppression and the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020.
So Americans gathered at their own Capitol to appropriately air grievances and protests at their Capitol, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of manipulative efforts that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our assembly online to exercise our rights under the First Amendment to talk to each other about whatever we want to talk about, including the insidious suppression of COVID that we were suffering across the country and our concerns about where the election was going as a whole.

And regarding the way people were led like lambs to the slaughter once inside the Capitol, Rep. Higgins has something to say about that, too:

HIGGINS: So, by the time it was actually J6, you had masses of Americans assembled outside the capital, almost like 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the Capitol.
TUCKER: Before the doors even open.
HIGGINS: Before the doors opened or else how you going to get around a couple? You've [Tucker] been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in...
TUCKER: It’s a labyrinth.
HIGGINS: It's a maze inside there. That's right. So there's no way Americans, most of which have never been to the capital, there's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the statuary or the House Chamber or the Senate Chamber. It's just not possible.
So the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe—and evidence indicates—that they were there to specifically wave in the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the Capitol.

Ultimately, Rep. Higgins estimates that there were as many as 200 FBI operatives at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, moving people around to their destruction.
It’s clear that, in the lead-up to the November election, the administration wants conservative Americans to be afraid to speak out about an election they deem suspect. Of course, should Trump manage to overcome probable epic election fraud, we can assume that violent Democrat protestors will once again get a pass from the people who control the government.
If you’re wondering where all of this is really going, both Bloomberg and the New York Times are no longer even bothering to hide their ultimate totalitarian goals: [ck site link, above, top, for text fm x screen grab]

Image: X screen grab.

 

[Apollonian]

The Establishment Is Unmasking Itself​

by Connor O'Keeffe | Mises Institute
January 10th 2024, 2:11 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-establishment-is-unmasking-itself/

The establishment is unwilling to admit that they are the reason Trump was elected. But, ironically, by attempting to disqualify him from participating in the election, they undermine the illusion of democracy—their main source of legitimacy in the eyes of many Americans.

Two weeks ago, I wrote an article laying out the political class’s struggle to preserve its legitimacy by fighting to regain control over the digital information space. The piece built on Martin Gurri’s thesis that the wide adoption of the internet has caused an information revolution that, similar to the adoption of the printing press, has allowed dissent to grow and spread beyond the control of the ruling classes. The results have been political shocks like the Arab Spring, the passage of Brexit, and the election of Donald Trump.

If the twenty-first century has been a war to preserve the establishment’s legitimacy, the current battle in the United States is the 2024 presidential election.

There’s truth to the familiar cliché that the next election is always the most important in history. As the federal government grows, spends more of our money, and intrudes more in our daily lives, the stakes of elections get higher and higher.

That still holds true for 2024, but there is much more going on. In Anatomy of the State, after defining the state as the “organization in society which attempts to maintain a monopoly of the use of force and violence in a given territorial area,” Murray Rothbard dedicates a chapter to how states preserve themselves.

In Rothbard’s words:
https://www.infowarsstore.com/catal...medium=banner&utm_content=X2BlackFridaybanned

While force is [the ruling class’s] modus operandi, their basic and long-run problem is ideological. For in order to continue in office, any government (not simply a “democratic” government) must have the support of the majority of its subjects. This support, it must be noted, need not be active enthusiasm; it may well be passive resignation as if to an inevitable law of nature. . . . Therefore, the chief task of the rulers is always to secure the active or resigned acceptance of the majority of the citizens.

In the United States, the political establishment has for many years evoked democracy to legitimize its actions in the eyes of the public. Doing so transforms any action they take into an embodiment of the people’s will and any opposition into a selfish denial of everyone else’s wishes.

But the internet allowed the public to see that many views and beliefs that had been presented as fringe were in fact popular—often even more popular than so-called mainstream ideas.

That revelation bolstered the antiestablishment movements of the 2010s—Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Ron Paul Revolution, and Trump’s 2016 campaign. And it sent the political establishment into a crisis of legitimacy.

Tens of millions of Americans sent Donald Trump to the White House in one of the biggest repudiations of the established political class in American history. In response, instead of reflecting on why so many Americans were so fed up with them, the establishment decided to frame Trump as the root cause of all the nastiness and hostility aimed their way. According to them, one man was corrupting America with hate, greed, and Russian propaganda.

That thinking has culminated in years of establishment attempts to remove Trump from power and later to bar him from ever holding office again. First, there was discussion of ousting him using the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Then came the attempt to tie him to Russian intelligence. Next, they tried to impeach him twice. Finally, they charged him with felonies. Now some states are attempting to remove him from the 2024 ballot for a crime he hasn’t even been charged with.

The establishment is unwilling to admit that they are the reason Trump was elected. But, ironically, by attempting to disqualify him from participating in the election, they undermine the illusion of democracy—their main source of legitimacy in the eyes of many Americans. It’s hard to see how that will go well for them.

 

[Apollonian]

COUP: Democrats & Deep State Preparing to Remove President’s Control of Military if Trump Elected​

by Jamie White
January 14th 2024, 5:16 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/coup...sidents-control-of-military-if-trump-elected/

"A network of public interest groups and lawmakers, nervous about former President Trump’s potential return to power, is quietly devising plans to foil any effort on his part to pressure the U.S. military to carry out his political agenda," NBC reports.

Democrat lawmakers, advocacy groups, and former government officials are “quietly devising plans” to stop former President Donald Trump from asserting control of the military if elected president again in November, according to a report.

NBC News’ article titled, “Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House,” details how “a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers” are preparing to “foil any efforts” for Trump to use the military to carry out his political agenda if he becomes Commander-in-Chief once again.

The report acknowledged that despite the fact Trump will have “vast powers” as Commander-in-Chief bestowed by the Constitution and the American people, these groups are nonetheless working to subvert his ability to lawfully order the military carry out his agenda.

“America’s commander-in-chief has vast powers at his disposal — some well-known, others not so much. Some lawmakers and pro-democracy advocates worry there may be nothing stopping a president from mobilizing the military to intervene in elections, police American streets or quash domestic protests,” NBC News reported.


Among the individuals and groups involved in this soft coup are former Acting Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord, former Defense Secretary Mark Esper, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and leftist activist groups like Democracy Forward.

From NBC News:

Those taking part in the effort told NBC News they are studying Trump’s past actions and 2024 policy positions so that they will be ready if he wins in November. That involves preparing to take legal action and send letters to Trump appointees spelling out consequences they’d face if they undermine constitutional norms.
“We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things that he [Trump] might do so that we’re ready to bring lawsuits if we have to,” said Mary McCord, executive director of the Institution for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law.
Part of the aim is to identify like-minded organizations and create a coalition to challenge Trump from day one, those taking part in the discussions said. Some participants are combing through policy papers being craftedfor a future conservative administration. They’re also watching the interviews that Trump allies are giving to the press for clues to how a Trump sequel would look.
Other participants include Democracy Forward, an organization that took the Trump administration to court more than 100 times during his administration, and Protect Democracy, an anti-authoritarian group.
“We are preparing for litigation and preparing to use every tool in the toolbox that our democracy provides to provide the American people an ability to fight back,” said Skye Perryman, president of Democracy Forward. “We believe this is an existential moment for American democracy and it’s incumbent on everybody to do their part.”

One of this anti-Trump network’s top concerns is President Trump removing stay-behind bureaucrats in the Pentagon who won’t faithfully execute the president’s lawful orders or carry out his anti-war agenda.

“The Pentagon is going to be a super high priority, and they have to understand there will be a new sheriff in town,” NBC cited Bannon as saying. “You’re going to see a massive housecleaning at the Pentagon. President Trump wants to put in a philosophy of how to win wars.”

The network is also working to prevent Trump from pulling out of NATO because the U.S. bankrolls most of the alliance’s budget.

“Lawmakers like Blumenthal are taking steps akin to placing sandbags around a building before a hurricane hits. They’ve made it tougher for a president to pull out of the NATO military alliance, for example,” NBC reported.

These groups are also “wary” about Trump possibly invoking the Insurrection Act, which NBC admits “gives a president considerable discretion,” to use active-duty military to carry specific policy objectives.

“There are an array of horrors that could result from Donald Trump’s unrestricted use of the Insurrection Act,” Blumenthal said in an interview. “A malignantly motivated president could use it in a vast variety of dictatorial ways unless at some point the military itself resisted what they deemed to be an unlawful order. But that places a very heavy burden on the military.”

A former Trump administration official who wished to remain anonymous echoed Blumenthal’s worry: “The Insurrection Act is a legal order, and if he orders it there will be military officers, especially younger men and women, who will follow that legal order,” he said.

Finally, this Democrat network claims they are duty-bound to prevent Trump from asserting control of the military because they claim he might “assassinate political rivals.”

These claims are made by the same people who pushed the “Russia collusion” hoax coup in a bid to unseat President Trump in his first term.

For example, former Acting Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord was the one who processed the FISA warrants unlawfully used to spy on Trump’s campaign in 2017 as part of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” witch hunt.

Conservatives on social media widely criticized these efforts as a “coup” and an act of “treason.”

Treason, that’s called treason https://t.co/YMlAO0EBSR
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 14, 2024

This is called a “coup,” and openly discussed by the very same people who lecture you that *Trump* is the danger to democracy. Every day they panic even more exposing themselves for what they are. And they wonder why the American people have had enough. https://t.co/edQI5QvUzz
— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) January 14, 2024

COUP: NBC is reporting that Democrats are preparing to remove the president’s control of the military if Trump is elected. The framers put the president at the top of the military hierarchy to ensure that the military would always remain subordinate to the elected, civilian… https://t.co/XwthSr7vWy
— @amuse (@amuse) January 14, 2024

Openly admitting that they are planning a military coup if Americans re-elect Donald Trump.

All to protect democracy of course. https://t.co/65JFH8DeJy
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 14, 2024

Pre-emptive coup https://t.co/7uGH6MpUcM
— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) January 14, 2024

As deep state democrats strategize a military coup if Trump gets re-elected – NBC soft pedals the treason. Neurolinguistic programming at work. https://t.co/nt0UpW0EKa
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) January 14, 2024

Translation

“We’re scared Trump is going to win and throw us in gitmo for treason, so we are trying to organize a coup so that doesn’t happen.” https://t.co/niKieOjPeN
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) January 14, 2024

Whenever Democrats accuse Trump of doing something, it’s a guarantee that Democrats are planning to do that very thing against Trump.

Which means Democrats are preparing to use the military to steal the 2024 election and prevent their opponents from lawfully taking power. https://t.co/fVOIN9Ebr8
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 14, 2024

Am I reading this right…if @realDonaldTrump wins in November, these people are already planning how to overthrow his presidency?@BarackObama are you okay with this? https://t.co/1GCic0EFyo
— General Mike Flynn (@GenFlynn) January 14, 2024

What do we call this? If Trump is in office? A coup on a sitting president.

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department… https://t.co/5dxpA5SpxQ
— Wendy Patterson (@wendyp4545) January 14, 2024

This is what is called a Coup d’état pic.twitter.com/sG6cARSEjG
— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeacefull) January 14, 2024

The NBC News military coup proposal piece tries to argue they need to pre-orchestrate military defiance of the Commander-In-Chief bc, among other things, Trump might assassinate opposing lawmakers.

All-time hall of fame “It’s Coming Right For Us” predicate creation https://t.co/bUkSUJZDpR pic.twitter.com/Au911gSDSt
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) January 14, 2024

Regime action plan 2024: seems “Caesar Trump” rhetoric is devised to legitimize military coup if elected. https://t.co/XaZptAw5gA
— Lee Smith (@LeeSmithDC) January 14, 2024

HOLY SHIT…

NBC News just admitted the Deep State exists.

A “network of public interest groups and lawmakers” are “quietly devising plans” to prevent Trump from using the military to carry out retribution.

They know Trump is going to win, and know what he’s about to do. https://t.co/ZqBiQWSVTw
— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) January 14, 2024

What does the National Security State really have planned for the next Trump presidency?

They’re planning mass destabilizing riots of such a scale that only the National Guard can contain them, & pre-planning a way to block Trump from activating the National Guard https://t.co/7SRcM7JHDG pic.twitter.com/7HPU6tcici
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) January 14, 2024

Don’t worry — these unelected bureaucrats just want to remove the democratically elected Commander-in-Chief’s lawful control of the military to “protect democracy”!

 

[Apollonian]

VP nigga goes on big prop. show, "the View," to do heavy fear-mongering, usual lies against Trump

FOX News, "the Five" discusses this fear-mongering tactic by Demon-rats--who say Trump/Repubs have no "plan"

 

[Apollonian]

Globalist-satanists simply continue to conduct war against Trump and, by extension, the people of Jew S A, suckers

 

[Apollonian]

CAUGHT RED-HANDED: Fulton County Fani Willis’s Deputy DA Received $131,000 From Former Biden Aide​

Hunter FieldingFebruary 29, 2024

Link: https://newsaddicts.com/caught-red-...ty-da-received-131000-from-former-biden-aide/

According to records from the Federal Election Commission, Jeff DiSantis, a Democratic operative, and Fulton County Deputy District Attorney received a sum of $131,335 through four separate payments. These payments were made in exchange for consulting services provided to Representative Gabriel Amo (D-RI), a former Biden White House aide known for collaborating with local elected officials.
The money flow is significant because sources with direct knowledge of Fulton County’s office revealed DiSantis is a Biden plant inside a Fulton County office to target former President Donald Trump.
DiSantis’ payments were previously unreported.

DiSantis was working at the county DA’s office while operating a consulting firm named “20/20 Insights, LLC.” Sources revealed deputy district attorneys would likely have to sign an oath that prohibits them from working outside their county employment agreement. DiSantis’s oath, if he signed one, remains undisclosed.

It’s also noteworthy that DiSantis entered into a contract with Amo, who previously held a position within the Biden administration as the deputy director of the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs. Before his congressional bid in 2023, Amo served as the principal liaison to mayors and local elected officials, as stated in his White House biography. Additionally, Amo played key roles in President Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign and his transition team.
“That is the connection to the White House,” according to one source. “DiSantis did this. He’s the one. He is the one pulling all the strings. He was the one that walled her [Willis] off. He was in every important meeting. He is the brainchild behind this.”
DiSantis, a prominent and affluent Democratic operative, successfully managed Willis’ campaign in 2020, raising a total of $4 million.

“He had over $4 million in donations for running the district attorney’s race,” one source revealed about DiSantis’s fundraising. “Why would you want to take a major pay cut to get a $70,000 or $80,000 prosecutorial job?” the source asked. “I have no idea why.”
DiSantis boasts a wealth of professional experience surpassing that of the typical county employee. Prior to his current role, he served as the Executive Director of the Democratic Party of Georgia, showcasing extensive expertise in campaign finance law. Additionally, his official bio indicates that he held the position of Deputy Director of Compliance for the DNC:

Jeff has also worked for candidates in 30 states running for a variety of offices, including President of the United States, United States Senator, Governor, United States Representative, Attorney General, District Attorney, and Mayor, as well as for a national political party committee. He has served as a campaign manager, media consultant, pollster, press spokesman, research director, and policy advisor.

In 2010, DiSantis founded 20/20 Insights, LLC, where he served as the registered agent until this month. However, as of February 2, 2024, Christopher Huttman, who is DiSantis’ business partner, has assumed the role of registered agent for the company, replacing DiSantis.
The timing of the change raises questions. Just weeks before Willis was set to testify about her affair with fellow Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade, and just two days after a court filing alleging Willis’ romantic involvement with Wade, 20/20 Insights, LLC made the decision to replace DiSantis as the registered agent.

According to a source, Wade, a prosecutor on the Trump case, was responsible for selecting office employees. Multiple sources familiar with the relationship between Wade and Willis revealed that Wade played a pivotal role in deciding which employees to retain or dismiss in the DA’s office after her election triumph in November 2020.

 

[Apollonian]

Think of it: Demon-rats w. globalist-satanist backing are seriously trying to put the "choice of the people," Trump, in jail so as not to having to face him in genuine elections, suckers--what does this imply and forebode, morons?--this is a horrific dictatorship we're confronted w., fools.