Satanic Demon-rats are desperate for "speedy trial" against Trump

 
Latest charges against Trump ("insurrection," etc.) by corrupt DOJ are amazingly fake, phony, incompetent, utterly lacking in foundation--especially in view of the actual, brazen guilt of creepy Joe, son Hunter, and corrupt DOJ

 
Last edited:
Trump shyster explains that Trump DOES "believe" what he says is true--that election was fraudulent (as it obviously was, w. "mail-in" voting, etc.)

 
Last edited:

FBI "Lost Track" Of Large Number Of PAID Undercover Informants At Capitol Riot​

Written By BlabberBuzz | Thursday, 21 September 2023 08:35

Link: https://www.blabber.buzz/conservati...formants-at-capitol-riot?utm_source=alert-GI/

FBI "Lost Track" Of Large Number Of PAID Undercover Informants At Capitol Riot

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reportedly lost track of a significant number of its paid undercover informants present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, as per a former bureau official's statement reported by the New York Post.

Steven D'Antuono, the former Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Washington Field Office, testified to the House Judiciary Committee that the agency had to resort to a "poll" to ascertain the exact number of "Confidential Human Sources" (CHSs) present at the Capitol protest.
In a letter dated Tuesday to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R) voiced concerns regarding the bureau's management and vetting of its paid undercover informants. "We recently learned from a former senior FBI official that there was internal ambiguity about how many FBI CHSs were present at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, so much so that the FBI had to put out a 'poll' to determine the exact number of FBI sources present that day," the committee informed Wray. The letter also revealed that "at least one FBI CHS was in communication with his handler that day as events unfolded."

According to D'Antuono's testimony, the FBI had prior knowledge that some of its CHSs would be attending the protest. However, several unknown CHSs attended independently. He stated that while his field office was aware of some of its informants' presence at the event, it was not informed about CHSs from other field offices attending.

D'Antuono reported that the Washington Field Office requested FBI headquarters to "do a poll or put out something to people saying w[ere] any CHSs involved" to determine the number of CHSs present. After reaching out, the FBI "started getting responses back," D'Antuono added.
The former FBI official disclosed that a CHS from the Kansas City Field Office attended the protest and communicated with his handler. The CHS reportedly told his handler "while they were in the crowd, I think, saying that they were going in. They were trying to stop some of the action happening and they left or whatnot," D'Antuono elaborated.

The bureau's audit, as per the former FBI officials, revealed that "a handful" of informants were present at the rally.
The committee expressed that these revelations were "extremely concerning" and cast doubt on the FBI's use of CHSs and their credibility as informants. The Department of Justice Office of Inspector General reports that the bureau spends $42 million annually on payments to its CHSs.

"These revelations reinforce existing concerns, identified by Special Counsel [John] Durham, about the FBI's use of, and payment to, CHSs who have fabricated evidence and misrepresented information," stated Jordan's letter to Wray. "The Justice Department Inspector General also identified critical problems in the FBI's CHS program, including the FBI's failure to fully vet CHSs and the FBI's willingness to ignore red flags that would call into question an informant's reliability."
Jordan requested that Wray provide the committee with a "substantive briefing" detailing the bureau's use of informants on January 6 and the debriefing documents provided by the CHSs after the rally.
 

Jonathan Turley: Trump Gag Order ‘Unconstitutional’​

Infowars.com​

November 4th 2023, 11:03 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/jonathan-turley-trump-gag-order-unconstitutional/

"He can’t criticize the prosecutors. He can’t criticize witnesses. And Special Counsel Jack Smith just asked for this order to be expanded in an equally unconstitutional way," says law professor.

The Washington, D.C., court’s gag order against former President Donald Trump is unconstitutional, according to George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley.

Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” host Laura Ingraham asked Turley about the gag order and whether the temporary freeze on it issued by a DC appellate court bolster’s the Trump legal team’s argument that it violates his First Amendment rights.


“[L]et’s start with the D.C. Circuit,” Ingraham said Friday. “Now, does this temporary freeze signal that there is likelihood of success on the merits with the Trump legal team’s First Amendment claims for lifting that gag order?”

“Well, Laura, it’s hard to say because we have to wait to see how the panel reacts in its review, particularly the oral argument. They are essentially freezing any action here,” Turley said.

“They could have left it to continue, to continue while they reviewed it. But, they decided, perhaps in an abundance of caution, to order this stoppage until they can give it a full review. The reason I think this could be quite significant is I think that the order is unconstitutional. I said that when it was first issued.”
https://www.infowarsstore.com/vitam....video&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=D3banned
“It’s a very odd concept of an order because the court here insisted on having this trial before the election sort of shoe-horned it in before Super Tuesday,” he continued. “And everyone in this election is going to be talking about these cases, except one person under this gag order. And that is Donald Trump. He can’t criticize the prosecutors. He can’t criticize witnesses. And Special Counsel Jack Smith just asked for this order to be expanded in an equally unconstitutional way.”

“That has drawn the criticism, even of the ACLU, which is a staunch critic of Donald Trump, but the ACLU has said look, this is flagrantly unconstitutional,” he added.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday paused the gag order issued by District Judge Tanya Chutkan to give them more time to consider Trump’s request to pause the order while his appeal plays out before the court.


“The prosecution’s request for a Gag Order bristles with hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint and his relentless criticism of the government—including of the prosecution itself,” Trump’s attorneys told the appeals court in a filing Thursday. “The Gag Order embodies this unconstitutional hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint. It should be immediately stayed.”

Trump faces criminal charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith alleging he sought to overturn the 2020 election on January 6, and faces up to 55 years in prison if convicted.
 

Watch “Kash Patel Drops Thermonuclear BOMBSHELL on Trump Judge” on YouTube​

November 19, 2023 10:12 pm by CWR

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/watc...onuclear-bombshell-on-trump-judge-on-youtube/

[see vid at site link, above]

It’s a video short. Quick and easy to watch.
See also Trump Attorney Alina Habba BLASTS ‘Unhinged’ Judge, Corrupt Letitia James After Show Trial [VIDEO]

Summary: the judge should recuse herself because she was an attorney representing Fusion GPS back when all of that was going down.
See also Media's Fixation on Irrelevant Trump Comments Masks 5-Year Accountability Deficit
 

Deutsche Bank May Have Just Destroyed Letitia James’ Civil Fraud Case Against Trump​

By Cristina Laila Nov. 28, 2023 6:40 pm

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...just-destroyed-letitia-james/?utm_source=rss/

letitia-james_donald-trump_4722_1.webp

Deutsche Bank might have just blown up Letitia James’s civil fraud case against President Trump.
Radical Marxist New York Attorney General Letitia James is seeking $250 million in ‘damages’ when there is no victim in this fraud case and she is also seeking to ban Trump and his sons from operating any businesses in New York. She accused Trump of inflating his assets and defrauding lenders and insurance companies.
A Deutsche Bank executive who worked to approve at least one of Trump’s loans testified on Tuesday that it is “atypical, but not entirely unusual” to reduce a client’s asset values and still approve a loan.

This type of lending is typical in high net-worth, high-profile clients like Donald Trump. Anyone with basic knowledge of banking, lending, portfolio and credit risk management knows this.
7 Reasons to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Premium Beef Right Away
“A Deutsche Bank AG executive gave testimony that could bolster Donald Trump’s defense in his civil fraud trial, telling a New York judge that prospective clients can get loans even after reporting a net worth far higher than the lender’s own calculations.” Bloomberg reported.
“David Williams, who worked on at least one of three loans Deutsche Bank made to Trump in the years before he was elected president, testified Tuesday that it’s “atypical, but not entirely unusual” for the bank to cut a client’s stated asset value by 50% and approve a loan anyway, as it did with Trump,” Bloomberg reported.
Williams testified that Trump’s stated assets are merely an opinion and a difference of opinion in asset values does not disqualify the potential borrower from a loan.
“It’s just a difference of opinion,” Williams said, according to Bloomberg.
Late last month far-left New York Judge Arthur Engoron blasted Trump’s lawyers and said fining Trump for ‘illegal profits’ is an ‘available remedy’ – in a fraud case with zero victims.
Engoron said fining Trump for ‘illegal profits’ is an available remedy…even though there are no victims and a Deutsche Bank executive testified that loaning Trump was a “good credit decision.”
Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, a convicted felon, testified last month.
Last month, Michael Cohen, a known liar, told the court that Trump inflated his assets. He continued his testimony later that week where he admitted in court that Trump never ordered him to inflate his financials.
“So Mr. Trump never asked you to inflate the numbers on his financial statement,” Trump attorney Cliff Robert asked Michael Cohen, according to CNN.
“Correct,” Michael Cohen said.
Trump’s lawyer Cliff Robert immediately asked the judge to dismiss the trial because Cohen, the key witness, just told the court that Trump never instructed him to inflate his assets.
Judge Engoron denied the motion to dismiss and it was at this point that Trump got up and abruptly walked out of the courtroom.
“The witness just admitted that we won the trial and the judge should end this trial immediately,” Trump said after he stormed out of the courtroom last month.
 

Michael Cohen Admits To Accidentally Filing Fraudulent, AI-Generated Case Citations​

Link: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/micha...iling-fraudulent-ai-generated-case-citations/

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - OCTOBER 24: Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen arrives at Trump's civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme Court on October 24, 2023 in New York City. Cohen is expected to testify against the former president.Trump may be forced to sell off his properties after Justice Arthur Engoron canceled his business certificates and ruled that he committed fraud for years while building his real estate empire after being sued by Attorney General Letitia James, seeking $250 million in damages. The trial will determine how much he and his companies will be penalized for the fraud. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Donald Trump’s former lawyer and “fixer” Michael Cohen arrives at Trump’s civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme Court on October 24, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

OAN’s Michaelangelo Hernandez
5:15 PM – Friday, December 29, 2023

Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen was caught red handed and admitted to giving his lawyer AI generated legal citations he obtained by using Google Bard while filing to have his probation shortened.

In court filings unsealed on Friday, Cohen admitted to using the AI program after the court threatened to sanction his counsel, David Schwartz, upon finding out the cases referenced in his request files did not exist.
Cohen said he had not kept up with “emerging trends” and the risks that come with using AI software. He added that he trusted his lawyer to “vet” any suggestions he made prior to filing.
“As a non-lawyer, I have not kept up with emerging trends (and related risks) in legal technology and did not realize that Google Bard was a generative text service that, like Chat-GPT, could show citations and descriptions that looked real but actually were not,” Cohen said. “Instead, I understood it to be a super-charged search engine and had repeatedly used it in other contexts to (successfully) find accurate information online.”
Click to expand...
This is not the first time that the disgraced ex-lawyer has had a run in with the law. In 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion for his alleged part in arranging payouts for Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal in order for them to keep their “reported relationship with the former president a secret.”
In his punishment, Cohen served a three-year prison sentence. He is currently in the middle of his three-year term of supervised release.
Cohen used to have a close relationship with his former client Donald Trump. However, their relationship became bitter when Cohen shifted positions, becoming a key witness in the Manhattan criminal trial that targeted the Republican president.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top