NEXT disaster regarding the poison covid vaxxes, suckers--were devastating to kidneys, morons

[Apollonian]

New Zealand Fudged The Data On How Kidneys Fare After COVID Vaccines​

BY TYLER DURDEN
TUESDAY, JAN 09, 2024 - 01:00 AM
Authored by Colleen Huber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/new-zealand-fudged-data-how-kidneys-fare-after-covid-vaccines

In a January 2023 preprint in The Lancet, the New Zealand government released a study showing a 70 percent increased rate of kidney injury following two doses of Pfizer mRNA vaccines. Even more telling of injury was the dose-dependent effect. That is, one dose of Pfizer showed a 60 percent increased rate of injury within three weeks post-injection, while two doses showed a 70 percent increased rate of injury three weeks post-injection. “Acute kidney injury” was not defined by the authors but is understood in a clinical setting to include measurable changes in lab results and/or serious signs and symptoms such as bleeding, pain with urination, kidney stones, nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, or other renal dysfunction.
(Flowersandtraveling/Shutterstock)

The data were drawn from a national database of over 4 million people over the age of 5 who had received the Pfizer vaccines. This number represented 95 percent of New Zealand adults and teenagers.
Compared to historical background rates of kidney injury, the following changes in acute kidney injuries were found in the original article, as shown in this screenshot.

These alarming results of vastly increased kidney injury were published in the abstract of the original article, and here are two screenshots from the January 2023 version of the abstract of that article: [1]

Now let’s zoom in on the last two sentences:

None of the above is now available online anymore, except through web archives.
The full paper does not seem to be available anymore anywhere, just the abstract, and the following is what appears when you click on the link that worked back in January:

The original full article seems to no longer be available on the internet, but I still have the above screenshots. Journalist Alex Berenson wrote a summary of the original article. [2]
Hiding the Data in New Zealand
Then a strange thing happened to the New Zealand data. Not only did the above paper disappear, but the numbers of reported acute kidney injuries were cut nearly in half. Here is what the same table now shows, from the same-titled paper, by the same authors, since August 2023, [3] at this link:

Suddenly, from January to August 2023, the observed acute kidney injury (AKI) events now are only 57 percent and 58 percent, respectively, of the originally reported AKI events. As a result, the data shown in August look like the Pfizer vaccine made no difference or even implied a slight benefit, whereas the data published seven months earlier had shown an alarming increase in acute kidney injuries postvaccine.
Also, in the August 2023 revision, the reported number of those who had received the first dose was reduced by about 100,000, and the number of those receiving the second dose was reduced by over 200,000.
During the time period of the study, Feb. 19, 2021, to Feb. 10, 2022, New Zealand had relatively low rates of COVID-19, as seen in the chart below. [4] The curve below took a vertical turn on Feb. 11, 2022, which was the day after the New Zealand government authors of the paper stopped collecting data. Until that dramatic turn, daily new confirmed COVID cases in New Zealand remained near zero.

So it is not plausible to attribute the kidney injuries seen in New Zealand post-COVID vaccines to COVID-19 infection.
The following list of kidney injuries and disorders were observed in the Pfizer clinical trials. [5] Pfizer listed the following urinary tract injuries seen in the Pfizer clinical trials in its “Appendix 1: List of adverse events of special interest.”
From the Pfizer list of over 1,200 types of injuries, I pulled out the syndromes and injuries observed in the Pfizer trials that were specifically related to, or consequent to injuries to, the kidneys, and/or syndromes and injuries that affected the kidneys more than any other organ. I found 40 such disease conditions. They are as follows:

1. 2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria.
2. Acute kidney injury.
3. Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive.
4. Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease.
5. Autoimmune nephritis.
6. Bilirubin urine present.
7. C1q nephropathy.
8. Chronic autoimmune glomerulonephritis.
9. Cryoglobulinaemia.
10. Dialysis amyloidosis.
11. Fibrillary glomerulonephritis.
12. Glomerulonephritis.
13. Glomerulonephritis membranoproliferative.
14. Glomerulonephritis membranous.
15. Glomerulonephritis rapidly progressive.
16. Goodpasture syndrome.
17. Henoch Schonlein purpura nephritis.
18. IgA nephropathy.
19. IgM nephropathy.
20. Immune-mediated nephritis.
21. Immune-mediated renal disorder.
22. Lupus nephritis.
23. Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis.
24. Nephritis.
25. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
26. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.
27. Renal amyloidosis.
28. Renal arteritis.
29. Renal artery thrombosis.
30. Renal embolism.
31. Renal failure.
32. Renal vascular thrombosis.
33. Renal vasculitis.
34. Renal vein embolism.
35. Renal vein thrombosis.
36. Scleroderma renal crisis.
37. Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome.
38. Urine bilirubin increased.
39. Urobilinogen urine decreased.
40. Urobilinogen urine increased.

Here is a list of 10 other injuries and syndromes observed postvaccine in the Pfizer trial that involve the kidneys but are not exclusive to them. These often affect and damage the kidneys, but I did not include them on the above list since they are not specific to the kidneys. They are as follows:

1. ANCA vasculitis.
2. Diffuse vasculitis.
3. Disseminated intravascular coagulation.
4. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
5. Polyarteritis nodosa.
6. Pulmonary renal syndrome.
7. Systemic lupus erythematosus.
8. Systemic scleroderma.
9. Thrombotic microangiopathy.
10. Type III immune complex-mediated hypersensitivity syndrome.

More than 1,200 different adverse events of special interest were observed and reported in the Pfizer clinical trials. Here is a screenshot of just those related to disorders of the glomeruli, the fine filtering units throughout the kidneys—over a half million in each kidney—that separate blood from urine:


Other Findings of Kidney Injury Post-COVID Vaccination
Post-COVID vaccine renal events were recorded in a study of 111 patients with previously biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis and two prior mRNA vaccine doses. [6]
The authors found that 22.5 percent of vaccinated patients experienced new-onset or relapse of glomerulonephritis or other renal events following COVID vaccination. Additionally, 10.8 percent had increased proteinuria, 12.6 percent had worsening hematuria, and 0.9 percent had creatinine values 150 times what is normal or worse.
No difference was found between the Pfizer-vaccinated and Moderna-vaccinated with respect to renal events.
The study found the following:
Graph: Y Ota, et al. Association between COVID-19 vaccination and relapse of glomerulonephritis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686234/
That study did not discuss the time elapsed from vaccination to glomerulonephritis pathology. This smaller study of 13 patients found that the median time of onset was one week after the first dose and four weeks after the second dose. [7] The patients typically presented with acute kidney injury, edema, and visible blood in the urine.
Several reports of minimal change disease appear in the peer-reviewed literature. [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Most of those cases occurred within several days of receiving a mRNA COVID vaccine, usually after the second dose, sometimes after the third dose. [15] It has also been seen following the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine. [16]
Minimal change disease is not one of the conditions noted in the Pfizer adverse events list. It is an insidious kidney disorder that is so named for the very subtle changes in the glomeruli filtration, which leaves gaps in filtration. Nephrotic syndrome results, in which proteins leak through the gaps from the blood into the urine, and then systemic effects of hypoproteinemia result.
Other kidney diseases observed following COVID vaccination include the following:

• Visible blood in the urine (hematuria) within hours after vaccination. [17]
• Membranous nephropathy. [18]
• Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. [19]
• ANCA glomerulonephritis. [20]
• ANCA vasculitis. [21]
• IgA nephropathy in children. [22]

Magnetic resonance urography is shown below in an MRI image of the kidneys and proximal ureters (photo from OHSU).
https://www.ohsu.edu/school-of-medicine/diagnostic-radiology/body-imaging
We can appreciate in the above photo that the fan shape of a kidney allows lots of surface area peripherally for maximum fine filtration of blood to urine, and the collecting ducts gather centrally toward the minor calyces, major calyces, and then finally, the renal pelvis, to effectively drain off urine with downward flow, gravity-assisted. Hence the fanned “kidney bean” shape.

If You Think the Kidneys Were Hit Hard . . .
After an extensive review of the medical literature over the last three years, since the onset of mass COVID vaccination campaigns, I can say with confidence that the medical literature reveals many fewer victims of kidney injuries following these vaccines than of other types of bodily injuries. Other bodily organs have fared far worse than the kidneys for most of the victims. Most notable and now well-known are the myocarditis and other cardiovascular injuries, for which I described the mechanisms of injury and the ubiquity among the COVID-vaccinated population, [23] as well as brain injuries, [24] among others.
Future vaccines must be screened thoroughly for risk to kidneys and other organs before use in adults, and then only with fully detailed and uncoerced informed consent. Clearly, such toxic products as mRNA injections must never be used in children at all and must never be made a condition of work or study for anyone.

[2] A Berenson. URGENT: A big New Zealand study reveals high rates of kidney injury after the Pfizer jab. Jan 26 2023. Unreported Truths.

[3] M Walton, V Pletzer, et al. Adverse events following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aug 9 2023. Drug Saf. 46 (9): 867-879. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442303/

[8] V D’Agati, S Kudose, et al. Minimal change disease and acute kidney injury following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Kidney Int. May 15 2021. 100 (2). 461–463. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.035. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123374/

[17] L Negrea, B Rovin. Gross hematuria following vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in 2 patients with IgA nephropathy. Jun 2021. Kidney Int. 99 (6). 1487. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987498/

[18] N Chavarot, M Padden, et al. De novo posttransplant membranous nephropathy following BNT 162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in a kidney transplant recipient. Dec 2022. 22 (12). 3188-3189. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537991/

[19] N Morimoto, T Mori, et al. Rapidly progressive IgA nephropathy with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis-like lesions in an elderly man following the third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a case report. Apr 24 2023. BMC Nephrol.. 24 (1). 108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37095451/

[21] M Shakoor, M Birkenbach, et al. ANCA-Associated vasculitis following Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Oct 2021. Am J Kidney Dis. 78 (4). 611-613. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34280507/

[22] C Hanna, L Herrera Hernandez, et al. IgA nephropathy presenting as macroscopic hematuria in 2 pediatric patients after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Sep 2021. Kidney Int. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256683/

MORE MEDICAL STORIES ON ZEROHEDGE​

Plastic Chemicals Causing Infertility, Diabetes Found 'Widespread' In Common Food Items: Report​

FDA Commissioner Promotes Products Off Label, An Illegal Pharma Marketing Scheme Long Criticized By Democrats​

Vision Loss Predicted To Surge 55% By 2050​

​

 

[Apollonian]

BREAKING--Peer-Reviewed, Published: Autopsy Findings in Cases of Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis​

European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Journal with Startling Evidence for Physicians Supporting Vaccination​

JAN 15, 2024

Link: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-published?utm_medium=ios/

[see below audio-file]

ARTICLE VOICEOVER
1×
0:00
-5:56

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
The American College of Cardiology in 2022, with an unprecedented position statement on an illness outside of their field, published the ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Cardiovascular Sequelae of COVID-19 in Adults and in that document stated “The ACC has long supported vaccination as a vital protective measure against dangerous illness and for personal and community health. There is no question that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination generally outweigh the risks.”

Now a paper peer-reviewed and published today should make every cardiologist question their support of COVID-19 vaccination with the reality that some patients have died with myocarditis sacrificing their lives for a vaccine without randomized trial data demonstrating reductions in viral transmission or adjudicated COVID-19 hospitalization, death or any hard outcome. The dangerous ACC proposition based on a false premise has eroded: “COVID-19 illness causes more myocarditis than the vaccine, so we should vaccinate patients” and therefore cause MORE and FATAL myocarditis! No reasonable and prudent doctor could practice with this perverse rationalization.
Hulscher et al, published in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure, a report on 28 cases of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis and concluded based upon the pathologic findings that death was caused by the injection. Without vaccination, these patients with an average age of 44 would be alive today. They also conclude using the Bradford-Hill criteria, that cardiac death after vaccination can be inferred using epidemiological criteria, in other words, unexplained cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated with no prior antecedent disease are likely caused by vaccination.


Hulscher N, Hodkinson R, Makis W, McCullough PA. Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jan 14. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14680. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38221509.
I expect the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex to exert tremendous pressure on Wiley the publisher and the journal to retract the paper in violation of the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. This has occurred numerous times during the pandemic as a form of medical censorship, when valid papers are published demonstrating the fatal harms of COVID-19 vaccination. To be prepared, here are the COPE criteria:

Editors should consider retracting a publication if:​

• They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of major error (eg, miscalculation or experimental error), or as a result of fabrication (eg, of data) or falsification (eg, image manipulation)
• It constitutes plagiarism
• The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper attribution to previous sources or disclosure to the editor, permission to republish, or justification (ie, cases of redundant publication)
• It contains material or data without authorisation for use
• Copyright has been infringed or there is some other serious legal issue (eg, libel, privacy)
• It reports unethical research
• It has been published solely on the basis of a compromised or manipulated peer review process
• The author(s) failed to disclose a major competing interest (a.k.a. conflict of interest) that, in the view of the editor, would have unduly affected interpretations of the work or recommendations by editors and peer reviewers.

We have taken every step to ensure none of these criteria could be met for this paper. In my view the most important figure in the paper demonstrates how large numbers of vaccine deaths are occurring among young people otherwise known as “sudden adult death syndrome.”


Hulscher N, Hodkinson R, Makis W, McCullough PA. Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jan 14. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14680. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38221509.
Please share this Substack with the link to the publication. It will need to be widely read among physicians, allied health workers, policy-makers, and the public in order for this sobering reality to sink in. What tragically took the lives of these young people has happened to millions around the globe—a horrific revelation for modern medicine.

 

[Apollonian]

Top Cardiologist Reports 47-Fold Increase in Serious Myocarditis Post Covid Vaccinations as He Calls on GMC to Investigate.​

BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON FEBRUARY 29, 2024

Link: https://expose-news.com/2024/02/29/...ccinations-as-he-calls-on-gmc-to-investigate/

The daily Sceptic reports: Dr. Dean Patterson, a leading consultant cardiologist in Guernsey and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, has written to the U.K. medical professional regulator the General Medical Council (GMC) calling for an investigation into harms from the COVID-19 vaccines, in a letter first published on Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s website.
February 19th 2024
Charlie Massey
Chair of Executive Board
The General Medical Council
Dear Mr. Massey,

I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a distinguished medical professional who, through his dedication to improving public health and promoting evidence-based medicines, has inspired numerous medical professionals to speak out in support of non-pharmaceutical management of chronic illness. He has been attacked for his stance in the past, in respect to his views on sugar and statins. He today again stands accused of spreading dangerous misinformation by a group of medical professionals who appear dedicated to reducing science and medical practice to an echo chamber.
Over the last 10-15 years, I have become increasingly aware of Dr. Aseem Malhotra as a cardiologist who has made significant contributions to the field of preventive cardiology and lifestyle medicine. His commitment to challenging conventional medical wisdom and advocating a more holistic approach to healthcare has earned him widespread respect and admiration within the medical community and beyond. That said, he has also faced opposition over the years from critics. He has faced these criticisms openly and encouraged debate on the science. This is a foundation cornerstone of the scientific method. I have been inspired by Dr. Malhotra’s bravery. He is the U.K. standard bearer for integrity and bravery in speaking out for patient safety. The world needs more doctors like him. Many doctors are too afraid to challenge mainstream dogma. Enabling doctors with opposing views to shut down Dr. Malhotra’s freedom to speak will damage patient safety.
I recall prior to the COVID-19 pandemic watching a lecture given online by Dr. Malhotra on December 15th 2019, ‘Evidence-Based Medicine has been hijacked’. This lecture succinctly explains why the doctors of today are not adequately equipped with the training to explain risk-benefit ratios of drugs and interventions to their patients. Not only is Dr. Malhotra an accomplished physician, but he is also a passionate advocate for addressing the root causes of chronic disease, particularly through lifestyle interventions and dietary modifications. His efforts to raise awareness about the impact of excessive sugar consumption and the overuse of medications in the treatment of chronic illnesses have been instrumental in sparking important conversations about the need for a paradigm shift in healthcare.
It is indeed a sad irony that Dr. Malhotra has been labeled an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist, as he himself took the initial COVID-19 vaccine, recommended it to others and even his father. He later realised that serious safety signals were being reported and understandably has concerns that the COVID-19 vaccine may have contributed to accelerated fatal acute myocardial infarction in his father.
Over the past 18 years, I have been a partner, consultant cardiologist and general physician at the Medical Specialist Group and Princess Elizabeth Hospital in Guernsey with a population of 63,000. Here I am proud to say, we provide a consultant-only service which leads to exceptional continuity of care compared to the NHS where multiple tiers of doctors working shifts care for patients.
In my personal experience, the COVID-19 vaccine has caused me intolerable concern for patient safety here in Guernsey. In my 33 years of medical practice, I have never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention. I lost a female patient due to myocarditis aged 42 in 2021. A 63-year-fit woman died from myocarditis one month after her booster vaccine in 2022 after getting breathless within one week of the injection. In addition, I personally cared for a 20-year-old male with severe myocarditis which developed within 24 hours of his second Pfizer vaccine. In the first year of the rollout, I diagnosed 20 patients with myocarditis and 15 cases of pericarditis, including one death (42 year-old) and another who required an ICD (79-year-old male). In the 16 years prior to this, I would on average diagnose two to three myocarditis cases per year, with serious cases being limited to one every three to four years. The U.K. ONS data for England and Wales show 250 hospital admissions for myocarditis over 10 years. This equates to two per 10 years for Guernsey. In the first year of the rollout, we had 10 hospital admissions for myocarditis. In the second year of vaccine rollout, I have seen another 18 myocarditis cases, including the death of the 63-year-old woman listed above.
In addition, I have noticed an increase in the number of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction cases. I am currently auditing the ambulatory ECG data as I believe there has been an increase in arrhythmia burden. Incredibly, the side-effects don’t stop there, as we have seen a doubling of the stroke numbers recently with an increase in overall thrombo-embolic disease since the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines.
I am therefore writing not only in support of Dr. Malhotra’s views on this matter but also to inform you that the medical establishment appears blind to the harm. I am extremely concerned that medical practice itself will be irreparably damaged by the fallout from the mishandling of the Covid vaccine side effects. Dr. Malhotra must be supported in his efforts to shine a light on this.
While the GMC is mandated to protect patients and regulate doctors, currently the GMC finds itself in a regulatory vacuum where it, like many mainstream doctors, is unable to openly support what should be an urgent independent investigation into Covid vaccine safety.
It is my opinion that the side-effects being detected are the tip of the iceberg. Healthcare professionals are quite poor at reporting Yellow Card cases, while the NHS doctors are overburdened and unlikely to spend 30-45 minutes submitting a Yellow Card incident. This is particularly the case when the same doctors have been indoctrinated with the statement that the Covid vaccines are safe and effective, while the evidence for this safety and effectiveness from double blind placebo controlled studies is extremely weak.
The initial Covid studies were due to complete in Q4 2023 and we await the final report, notwithstanding the major flaw that most of the placebo group have been vaccinated in 2021. A paper published very recently (K. Faksova, et al., ‘COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals‘, Vaccine, 2024) shows significant side-effects based upon this known under reporting.
Cardiologists in the main continue to blame COVID-19 infection as the cause for the harms I am seeing. However I have not diagnosed a single case of post-COVID-19 myocarditis prior to the vaccine rollout in Guernsey. The U.K. Government website from 2021 to date states that Covid causes myocarditis. The evidence it lists for this is flawed. One study it uses as evidence by Buckley et al. (‘Prevalence and clinical outcomes of myocarditis and pericarditis in 718,365 COVID-19 patients‘, Eur J Clin Invest. 2021) concluded that myocarditis had a prevalence of 5% in Covid patients. This study used data from the USA EMR records, which is poisoned by the flow of money. It is well documented that hospitals in the USA were paid $37,000 if a patient with Covid was admitted to ICU. ICU admissions would be promoted in patients with ‘multi-system involvement’. A rise in troponin, however insignificant, would be the rationale for diagnosing myocarditis and the accompanying $37,000 payment when the patient was admitted to ICU.
It is well known within the cardiologist circle pre-Covid that patients with sepsis often have a rise in troponin and the rise is proportional to age and co-morbidities and not indicative of myocarditis or a heart attack. In 2020, Guernsey had 20,000 Covid cases, which according to the paper by Buckley et al. would lead to 1,000 cases of myocarditis, but I have not diagnosed a single case of myocarditis prior to the vaccine rollout.
Dr. Melissa Heightman, a UCL Long Covid expert, is on record when speaking at the Acute and General medicine conference in 2022, stated that after MDT with cardiologists about the late gadolinium being seen on CMRI scans, they concluded it was just the usual background noise.
In the paper by Buckley et al. above they reference a paper by Puntmann et al. (‘Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)’, JAMA Cardiol. 2020) which erroneously concluded that 78 of 100 subjects recovered from mild Covid without cardiac symptoms had myocardial involvement on their cardiac MRI scans.
The correct interpretation is that the abnormalities seen were due to the same background noise referred to by Dr. Heightman, amplified further by the study done in Germany using 3 Tesla MRI scanners.
In the U.K. we use in the main 1.5 Tesla MRI scanners. More power equals more noise!
It is my opinion that the GMC must not only support whistleblowers like Dr. Malhotra, but urgently put in place the following:

1. A working group to investigate the COVID-19 vaccine safety. May I suggest you speak with Dr. Yvonne Young from the UKHSA and Dr. Melissa Heighten (UCL) to invite their views on this matter? I am part of a growing group of doctors who would like to be part of this investigation, as I am sure Dr. Malhotra would be.
2. A helpline to support doctors afraid of speaking out.
3. A helpline to support those who are vaccine injured. Clearly the GMC should seek support from the MHRA and U.K. Government with funding for this work.
4. A panel should be established to open discussion and reporting the above strategy in the media, in a calm unbiased manner to avoid undue stress on the general population and the healthcare system.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly endorse Dr. Aseem Malhotra and believe that his unwavering commitment to advancing a more patient-centric, evidence-based approach to healthcare makes him a valuable asset to the medical community. I am confident that his contributions in relation to exposing the truth about the COVID-19 vaccine safety will continue to have a lasting impact on the health and wellbeing of countless individuals. There are many doctors and healthcare professionals who will openly endorse my view, but sadly there are a silent majority who will only endorse my view quietly in private conversation.
Unfortunately, medicine finds itself standing at crossroads. There are significant seeds of division. The question for you is therefore: are you going to heal these wounds or empower the irreversible split of healthcare that beckons in an increasingly uncertain future?
Sincerely,
Dr. Dean Patterson MBCHB, FRCP
Pathologist Dr. Clare Craig writes on X that, assuming Dr. Patterson saw all the cases on the island, “that would equate to 35,000 myo- and pericarditis cases in U.K. and 200,000 in USA”.

The increase from one serious case every three to four years to the 28 hospital admissions Dr. Patterson reports for 2021 and 2022 represents a 47-fold increase in incidence. While the data are not publicly available for independent verification, there is no reason to doubt what Dr. Patterson reports from his clinical experience. An investigation into the true risks of these novel therapeutic products is urgently needed.
Source: The Daily Sceptic

 

[Apollonian]

COVID-19 vaccines definitely linked to kidney injuries and long-term renal damage

03/10/2024 // Cassie B.

Link: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-10-covid-vaccines-kidney-injuries-renal-damage.html/

The heart-related dangers of COVID-19 vaccines are very well-known at this point, but there is another organ that appears to be suffering from the jabs that is getting far less attention: the kidneys.

According to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, an epidemiologist, cardiologist and internist, a worrying number of kidney and renal effects are being reported in connection with the vaccine, and he fears that it may be overlooked to the point where these problems are not discovered in patients until it is too late to intervene.

He notes that kidneys receive a quarter of all cardiac output and filter blood on a regular basis. With studies showing that around half of vaccinated individuals have detectable levels of the COVID-19 vaccine spike protein in their bloodstream, it is not a stretch to posit that the spike protein and mRNA could end up settling within the kidneys and causing an expression of the spike protein there.

A scientific review outlined 28 published mechanisms of renal damage and kidney injury stemming from the jabs, with most pathways related to inflammation from autoimmunity or direct cytokine damage.

This dovetails with a paper that was published on a preprint server last year by scientists from the New Zealand Ministry of Health that showed the vaccine causes kidney injury. Interestingly, the paper somehow managed to “disappear” from the preprint server before popping up again later in the year in a peer-reviewed journal with some numbers changed to reframe the jab as safe for kidneys.

In an examination of VAERS database information, Steve Kirsch found that just one vaccine in the database’s 30-year history had a signal for acute kidney injury – and it was indeed the COVID-19 vaccine.

Doctors are too afraid to admit the vaccines cause damage​

The problem is that many in the medical establishment are so fearful of admitting that the vaccines can cause any damage that they aren’t giving the possibility the weight it deserves. After being threatened with losing their license, many physicians are hesitant to even suggest something could be wrong with a patient after getting jabbed. As a result, people may not be getting the tests and treatments they need.

This is something that Dr. McCullough, who is an expert in complications caused by the COVID-19 vaccine and the virus itself, is worried about. He said that with so many people experiencing “pressing medical problems” such as blood clots, cardiac arrest, myocarditis and stroke, renal damage might be discovered when it is too late to treat it.

South Korean researchers who explored new-onset kidney diseases following COVID-19 vaccination expressed a similar sentiment. They looked at cases of people without a history of kidney-related problems who sought medical care following symptoms that arose after COVID-19 vaccination, such as red urine, acute kidney injury and decreased renal function.

The study was not controlled, which means they cannot conclusively determine causality. But they did caution: “However, COVID-19 vaccines are known to cause new-onset or relapsing glomerular diseases due to potent immune dysregulation, and various therapeutic responses have been reported.”

In the conclusion of their study, which was published in the journal Vaccines, they wrote: “Although we could not confirm causality between vaccinations and these phenomena, in this time of mass vaccination, clinicians need to consider the possibility that vaccines may have provoked kidney diseases in patients who have renal symptoms.”

If healthcare providers aren’t allowed to talk about vaccine side effects, they won’t be able to monitor people or identify the causes of their problems so they can provide effective solutions. The damage has already been done by forcing untested vaccines on people, but now it’s time to acknowledge the very real adverse effects so doctors can be fully informed and help their patients get the treatment they need without fear of professional repercussions.

Sources for this article include:

Expose-News.com

PeterMcCulloughMD.Substack.com

KirschSubstack.com

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov