HUGE, suckers--BIG CONSPIRACY by globalist-satanists: Federal Reserve will bail-out ONLY the "woke" banks serving globalism-satanism

Apollonian

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Alex Jones Was Right Again! Yellen to Protect Only Globalist Banks – WATCH​

Ben Warren & Kelen McBreen
March 17th 2023, 12:57 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/alex...favors-to-protect-only-globalist-banks-watch/

We are in the middle of the globalist consolidation that will usher in the Great Reset! The NWO prison planet is being rolled-out RIGHT NOW

“We know the enemy’s playbook,” warns Alex Jones.

In the wake of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen now admitting that the government will only refund uninsured deposits to banks that pose a “systemic risk” to the financial system and NOT to every bank that fails, it’s vital to acknowledge Alex Jones called it just days ago:

Alex Jones says SVB is the start of the globalist plan to collapse smaller regional banks so that they can be absorbed by the 6 Big Banks connected to the Fed Reserve with an end goal to introduce Digital Currency aka CBDC’s as a solution to a crisis they created. Thoughts? pic.twitter.com/drTk5obVaj
— Melissa Tate (@TheRightMelissa) March 12, 2023
Click to expand...

“Next, they’ll start collapsing regional and lending banks to consolidate them into the big six globalist banks that own the private Federal Reserve and the European Union bank and the rest of it,” said Jones Monday. “Then out of that, they will call for Central Bank Digital Currencies to be rolled out…”

Jones went on to say how Biden’s new cyber security initiative is really a push to unleash a Central Bank Digital Currency that tracks and controls everything you do.

“Then they’ll try to ban all the normal cryptocurrencies that are actually independent and decentralized. As I said, look for them to crash the regional banks to bring in total control.”

Jones added that these globalist gambits for control are all different means to the same tyrannical end.

Also, don’t miss Jones’ important conversation with financial expert Edward Dowd on this issue and more from earlier this week:

Now, nearly a week after Jones was the first news personality to tell people small banks would not be bailed out, Treasury Secretary Yellen is finally admitting smaller regional banks across America will not be saved by the US government.

However, larger banks like Silicon Valley Bank and their customers like Democrat California Governor Gavin Newsom or the slew of Chinese business moguls banking there will be protected even beyond the FDIC $250,000 limit.

See Yellen make the shocking admission below:

Read a transcript of the conversation between Sen. Lankford and Yellen below:

h/t the Gateway Pundit

Sen. Lankford: Will the deposits in every community bank in Oklahoma, regardless of their size, be fully insured now? Are they fully recovered? Every bank, every community bank in Oklahoma, regardless of the size of the deposit, will they get the same treatment that SVBP just got or Signature Bank just got?

Janet Yellen: A bank only gets that treatment if a majority of the FDIC board, a supermajority, a supermajority of the Fed board, and I, in consultation with the president, determine that the failure to protect uninsured depositors would create systemic risk and significant economic and financial consequences.

Sen. Lankford: Right. So what is your plan to keep large depositors from moving their funds out of community banks into the big banks? We have seen the mergers of banks over the past decade. I’m concerned you’re about to accelerate that by encouraging anyone who has a large deposit in a community bank to say, we’re not going to make you whole, but if you go to one of our preferred banks, we will make you whole at that point.

Janet Yellen: Look, I mean, that’s certainly not something that we’re encouraging…

…More Yellen: Well, we felt that there was a serious risk of contagion that could have brought down and triggered runs on many banks. And that’s something, given that our judgment is that the banking system overall is safe and sound. Depositors should have confidence in the system, and we took these actions.

Lankford: So there’s a special assessment that’s been done on community banks in my state and all banks across the country. Was there any discussion that that special assessment would only apply to the larger banks? Or was it always assumed the special assessment would cover every bank, including rural banks in my state?

Janet Yellen: I’m not certain what the rules are around that for the FDIC to determine.

Sen. Lankford: It has been reported publicly that Svb had a large number of Chinese investors that are there, including some that were companies directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party. Will those individuals, companies, entities, and investors that are Chinese investors be made whole based on assessments in my banks in Oklahoma? So what I’m asking is, will my banks in Oklahoma pay a special assessment to be able to make Chinese investors whole from Silicon Valley Bank?

Janet Yellen: Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank, and I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there’s any legal basis to discriminate among uninsured.

Sen. Lankford: I get it, but I’m just saying my community banks are going to pay this additional fee. It is always fascinating to me as well, the conversation that taxpayers are being made whole in this, that taxpayers are not going to have any kind of consequence on this. I’m sure my bankers are going to be very excited to know they no longer pay taxes.
 
Last edited:

Banks Are Hiding At Least $620 Billion In Losses, Creating a Ticking Time Bomb Of Financial Disaster​

by Ethan Huff | Mar 17, 2023

Link: https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-n...ing-a-ticking-time-bomb-of-financial-disaster

AdobeStock_86719259-e1554916267314.jpeg

This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News.
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is just the tip of the iceberg as more than $620 billion in losses across the entire banking sector looms as a financial ticking time bomb.
According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the banking sector is currently sitting on unrealized losses of well over half a trillion dollars that at some point will have to be realized – but when?
The answer right now is nobody knows, but one thing is for sure: the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, and the Treasury Department are doing everything in their power to plug all the leaks on this financial Titanic to avoid a contagion event – at least for now.
We are told that the reason for this predicament has to do with the loads of bonds and treasuries that banks bought up during times of low-interest rates. Those bonds and treasuries are now deeply underwater as Jerome Powell continues to hike interest rates in a failed attempt to quell skyrocketing inflation.
“This is because higher interest rates mean that new bonds accrue higher rates of returns for investors,” writes Ryan King for The Washington Examiner. “As a result, older bonds have comparatively lower rates of return, rendering them less desirable for investors and therefore triggering a plunge in the value of older assets.”
“A consequence of the $620 billion unrealized potential loss phenomenon is that banks may quickly find themselves with less cash on hand than their books might have suggested.”
If the Fed decides to start dropping interest rates once again in order to save the banks, then you can expect to pay $100 for a loaf of bread once hyperinflation inevitably kicks in. If the Fed keeps raising rates to save the dollar, then the corrupt banking system and all of its financial tentacles will collapse.
It is a conundrum without a solution, hence why a crash and collapse are inevitable. It is a matter of when, not if, this financial Armageddon takes shape in such a way that it is no longer deniable in everyday life.
(Related: The collapse of the American financial system is accelerating – watch as Andy Schectman explains.)

Will the average American still be able to afford food in 2024 – assuming food is still readily available?​

We are already seeing the damage of all this financial Jerry-rigging in the form of $7 cartons of eggs – if you can even find eggs – and $5 gallons of gas – let’s go, Brandon! And by this time next year, prices will likely leap even higher.
All of this could have been avoided had American politicians from the past not bowed down to the private central bank known as the Federal Reserve, which in 1913 took over the country’s money supply and started lending its Federal Reserve fiat notes to the Treasury with interest.
This is known as usury, and because it is entirely debt-based, the final endgame is a financial disaster the likes of which this world has never seen – and will never again see, once all the dust settles.
“Biden knows that to get the CBDC into America (for the executive order he already signed in April 2022), the banking system has to crash to force the people to accept it,” wrote one commenter at Natural News about how this is all happening by design.
“The CDBC system isn’t ready yet. Might still be several months to a year out, but it’s coming. SVB caught them by surprise so Biden does what all the Bidens do: Lie, Lie, and Lie.”

INFLATION IS RUNNING AT 40-YEAR HIGHS!​

NEGATIVE INTEREST RATES ARE TAXING SAVERS, CREATING FOOD SHORTAGES, AND MAKING LIFE MISERABLE IN THE UNITED STATES!

THERE'S LITTLE TIME LEFT BEFORE THE REAL DISASTER OCCURS!​

DOWNLOAD THE ULTIMATE RESET GUIDE NOW!​


RELATED ARTICLES​

The Big Banks Have Bailed Out First Republic, Who Is Going To Bail Out The Big Banks?

The Big Banks Have Bailed Out First Republic, Who Is Going To Bail Out The Big Banks?​

by Michael Snyder | Mar 18, 2023 | 0 Comments
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog under the...
Credit Suisse Bank Admits “Material Weakness” As Shares Plunge and Investors Panic

Credit Suisse Bank Admits “Material Weakness” As Shares Plunge and Investors Panic​

by Mac Slavo | Mar 17, 2023 | 0 Comments
This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News under the title: Is Credit...
 

The Elites are bailing out their own banks, not yours.​

March 19, 2023 7:35 pm by IWB

Link: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/the-elites-are-bailing-out-their-own-banks-not-yours/

[see vid at site link, above]

Now the banks are failing – Silicon Valley Bank went from passing its KPMG audit with flying colors and getting their debt rated “A” by Moody’s mere weeks ago, to the executives frantically paying themselves bonuses and selling their shares in the hours and days before the bank failed and was taken over by the FDIC.
98% of the deposits in SVB were uninsured, meaning that those deposits wouldn’t shouldn’t have been covered by FDIC insurance. That means any accounts with balances above $250K were facing the loss of their funds.
But this is Silicon Valley Bank – this is where the elites place their bets on Silicon Valley unicorns. So we can’t have that.

In a hastily convened meeting between the FDIC, the Fed and the US Treasury, it was decided that all deposits would be covered, insured or not.
See also Silvergate exposure: 10 US Banks on the brink...FDIC can only cover 1.3% of accounts.
www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/your-bank-important-enough-save-dont-count-it

Here it is folks – from the mouth of the US Treasury Secretary herself:
Silicon Valley (mostly profitless unicorns incubated with printed money) are anointed and protected.
But your community bank can go F**k itself, and so can you.
Eat cake
 
Here's good vid (short and sweet) of US Senator re-capping the brilliant strategy of the now failing banks, like one at Silicon Valley (see above stories), which failed to note that int. rates had to go up--they just didn't think it would happen now, ho o ho ho

 

Before Its Collapse, Silicon Valley Bank Gave Over $70 Million To Black Lives Matter, Other Woke Causes: Report​

Link: http://www.womensystems.com/2023/05/before-its-collapse-silicon-valley-bank.html

Women System May 29, 2023

The report also highlighted that Signature Bank gave $850,000 to Black Lives Matter before folding.

A newly published report revealed that Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) gave over $70 million dollars to Black Lives Matter (BLM) as well as to other woke causes.
The report was published by the conservative Claremont Institute, the organization announced in an op-ed published by Newsweek. The report also stated that Signature Bank gave $850,000 to BLM before it folded.
It is not clear how the donated money was used, though the Claremont Institute suggested that money used BLM’s parent organization, the Global Network, to invest millions of dollars to “support future operations, purchasing luxury real estate, engaging in nepotism, disbursing grants to dozens of BLM chapters and revolutionary organizations, and operating a PAC to ‘elect progressive community leaders, activists, and working-class candidates fighting for Black liberation’” could serve as a possible indication.
According to The Federalist, SVB pledged to increase its “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)” commitment in the workplace after the George Floyd riots in the summer of 2020. Indeed, the bank stated in a DEI report that August that “Innovation is global and is touching every aspect of our lives, which is creating even more need for inclusiveness of ideas and approaches.”
“We are on a journey committed to increasing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in our workplace, with our partners and across the innovation economy,” the report continued.

A Corporate Responsibility Report released the same year detailed the company’s commitment to supporting “diversity” based on race and sex, and a cover letter attached to the report from CEO Greg Becker stated, “In recent months, we’ve expanded our philanthropic giving through corporate donations and employee matching programs … These programs focus on pandemic response, social justice, sustainability and supporting women, Black and Latinx emerging talent and other underrepresented groups.”
The report also detailed that the bank spent $2.8 million on “gender parity innovation” and “diverse emerging talent.”
Also in 2020, SVB launched a program called Missions, “a software platform designed to engage employees to act in support of the causes they care about most such as voter education and racial justice and equity,” in which employees donated $400,000 for “justice and equity for Black Americans,” the Post Millennial reported.
The following year, the bank reiterated its commitment to DEI, with a Corporate Proxy Statement holding “The Governance Committee’s focus on overall diversity continues in 2021, including on race/ethnicity and other underrepresented categories.”
The statement also detailed that the bank “responded” to Floyd’s death by “expanding opportunities for dialogue, including hosting over 40 small group ‘Conversation Circles’ in which over two-thirds of our employees participated in discussions about racial equity issues,” and how it made a deal with “Act One Ventures to launch The Diversity Term Sheet Rider for Representation at the Cap Table initiative, which advocates for venture capital firms to include in all of their term sheets a pledge to bring members of underrepresented groups into deals as co-investors.”
The statement further stated that SVB gave its employees “a week of volunteer events focused in part on racial equity, social justice and access to the innovation economy.”
A Corporate Responsibility Report published by the company that year also detailed that SVB intended to donate $50 million in its DEI program called Access to Innovation by 2025 “with a focus on women, Black and Latinx individuals.” In May of that year, the company also proposed a $11.5 billion community benefits plan in collaboration with the Greenling Institute, a leftist organization.
The bank also gave money to support “sustainability” goals such as a pledge in January 2022 of $5 billion “in loans, investments and other financing to support sustainability efforts,” according a statement released by the company. The year before, SVB reiterated a pledge of its Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) standards to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in an index given to the organization.
SVB’s ESG index directed to the WEF last year also stated that the company gave over $18 million to various nonprofits, amounts that are not included in the Claremont Institute’s report, according to the Post Millennial.
Speaking to The Federalist, Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, stated that SVB’s failure “is yet another indication that SVB was focused on woke virtue signaling instead of protecting their customers’ deposits.”
“Time after time we see the same pattern: companies that are the most concerned with ESG scores and woke politics do the worst jobs serving their customers,” Hild continued. “The rest of corporate America should learn from SVB’s failure now, before they are the next company to make headlines for comically poor management.”
SVB and Signature Bank are not the only banks that have collapsed since the start of the month. This week, the Swiss government bailed out Credit Suisse in an effort to stop the bank from collapsing.
 

US Government Spent $12,700,000,000 To Bail Out 10 Wealthy Depositors Amid Banking Crisis: Report​

Henry Kanapi
June 25, 2023
FUTUREMASH

Link: https://dailyhodl.com/2023/06/25/us...ealthy-depositors-amid-banking-crisis-report/





The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has released an unredacted document that shows the government guaranteed the deposits of Silicon Valley Bank’s (SVB) ten largest customers following its high-profile collapse in March.
The FDIC “mistakenly” released the complete version of the document following a Freedom of Information Act request from Bloomberg.

The document reveals the names of the firms that were bailed out, along with their total deposits that immensely exceed the $250,000 FDIC protection limit per account.
Stablecoin issuer Circle was SVB’s top depositor to the tune of $3.3 billion. In March, the Boston-based firm said $3.3 billion of the $40 billion backing its stablecoin USD Coin (USDC) was initially stuck in the bankrupt bank.
Venture capital giant Sequoia, a firm with $85 billion in assets under management, was also on the list with $1.1 billion in deposits.
In total, Silicon Valley Bank and its parent firm Silicon Valley Group were handed $4.6 billion.
Next up is Kanzhun Limited, an online recruitment services firm, which had over $902.87 million in deposits with SVB.
Coming in at number six is the California-based fintech firm Bill.com. The payments platform had a total balance of $761.10 million at SVB.
At number seven is Altos Labs, a biotech research company that had over $680.34 million stored with SVB.
Card issuing platform Marqeta is also on the list with more than $634.53 million in deposits.
Streaming device provider Roku had about $420 million in deposits with SVB.
Rounding out the list is IntraFi, a firm that offers FDIC-insured deposit solutions to large entities. According to the document, IntraFi had a total balance of $410.85 million at SVB.
All in all, the US government backstopped SVB’s 10 wealthiest depositors for over $12.75 billion.
 

Here’s Proof the Fed is a Political Entity… and It Leans LEFT​

March 26, 2024 3:08 pm by CWR
By Graham Summers, MBA

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/heres-proof-the-fed-is-a-political-entity-and-it-leans-left/

It’s time to tell the truth when it comes to Fed political interventions.
One of the biggest myths concerning the Fed is that it is politically independent. This is laughably false to anyone who has paid attention during the last 25 years.


Consider that in 2012, the Bernanke-led Fed announced QE 3, its largest QE program in history at the time (an $80 billion per month, open-ended program), a mere THREE MONTHS before the U.S. Presidential election.
Bear in mind, the U.S. economy was growing and the U.S. financial system wasn’t under significant duress at the time. So this was blatant political interference to aid the Obama Administration’s re-election bid by boosting the stock market and economy.
A second major example of Fed political bias concerns its major shift in monetary policy once Donald Trump became President. To fully grasp this, we need to provide a little historical context.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Fed engaged in eight years of extraordinary monetary easing, maintaining interest rates of 0.25% (zero), and engaging in over $3 trillion worth of QE from 2008 to 2015. Bear in mind that throughout this time, the U.S. economy was technically NOT in recession. Economic growth was steady:



And the unemployment rate was in a clear downtrend:
See also Robert DeNiro loses her mind on Bill Maher show — Here’s the full video.

Once the Fed actually ended easing, it embarked on one of the feeblest campaigns of tightening monetary policy in history, raising rates only one time in 2015 and 2016. I would note that all of this took place under the Obama administration.
Then Donald Trump won the 2016 Presidential election, and suddenly the Fed “got religion” about normalizing monetary policy. It raised rates three times in 2017 and another four times in 2018. In 2018 it also began shrinking its balance sheet via a process called Quantitative Tightening or QT. It would ultimately drain $500 billion in liquidity from the financial system via QT in 12 months. That is quite a shift considering the Fed had maintained rates at or close to ZERO for eight years prior to this.
See also Legislators aim to shut down Permanent Fund's Anchorage office, citing political interference.
Throughout 2016-2018, the Fed ignored numerous signals that this pace of tightening was placing the financial system under duress, right up until the junk bond market froze and the U.S. stock market crashed 20% during the holidays in December 2018.


For those who would argue that the Fed’s sudden shift from maintaining easy monetary policy for the better part of a decade to aggressively normalizing policy in the span of 20 months had nothing to do with Donald Trump being President, consider that former Fed Vice Chair Stanley Fisher admitted in an interview that the Fed’s raising rates in December 2018 was done specifically to hurt the economy because the Fed was annoyed with President Trump’s constant tweeting about them.
So again… the Fed IS a political entity… and it leans LEFT.
I’ll detail what this means investors as we head into the 2024 President election in tomorrow’s article. But for now, gold is giving us a clue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top