HUGE: Georgia Fails To Produce Chain Of Custody For 404,000 Absentee Ballots Months After Contested

[Apollonian]

HUGE: Georgia Fails To Produce Chain Of Custody For 404,000 Absentee Ballots Months After Contested Election​

by National File
March 8th 2021, 2:05 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/huge...ntee-ballots-months-after-contested-election/

A report by The Georgia Star News indicated that 67.5% of the states estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots lack chain of custody documents.

Months after the 2020 election, state and local officials in Georgia have failed to produce chain of custody documents for over 404,000 absentee votes put in drop boxes, according to a damning report by The Georgia Star News.

The report indicates that the state failed to produce chain of custody documentation for an estimated 404,691 absentee vote by mail ballots, which were placed into drop boxes and delivered to county registrars to be counted in the 2020 election.

This means that 67.5% of the states estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballot count was found to not have chain of custody documentation.

It is worth noting that the outcome of the 2020 election in Georgia was decided by less than 12,000 votes, which would be nearly 3% of the 404,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited into drop boxes and counted by county registrars.

Fulton County, facing widespread criticism for various credible allegations of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, is one of 35 scofflaw counties in Georgia that have failed to comply with open records requests and provide the absentee ballot drop box transfer forms that they were required to maintain according to the Emergency Rule passed by the Georgia State Election Board in July of 2020, according to the report.

Nearly 300 drop boxes were utilized to collect absentee ballots in the 2020 election, authorized under Georgia Election Code Emergency Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 approved by the State Election Board, instead of a statute passed by the Georgia State Assembly, which says that drop box collection teams “shall complete and sign a ballot transfer form upon removing the ballots from the drop box, which shall include the date, time, location and number of ballots.”

The drop boxes were stimulated in-part by donations to Georgia counties from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a 501 (c) (3) funded by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Zuckerberg donated nearly $350 million to the CTCL for their 2020 election efforts, with more than $25 million dollars going to the counties of Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb, and DeKalb, according to the report.

While some Georgia lawmakers have made efforts to bolster election integrity and stifle private funding of election administrations, it is unclear if Georgia Governor Brian Kemp or Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger will join the fight, despite objections by their constituents.

Republican concerns over the integrity of the 2020 election were echoed by President Donald Trump in a leaked phone call with Brad Raffensperger, who refused to acknowledge or address the credible evidence of mass voter fraud in his state, despite credible accusations of widespread voter fraud, including the infamous video in the case of Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss.

 

[Apollonian]

Greater Georgia demands accountability on Zuckerberg’s $5.6M donation to Raffensperger in 2020 election​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/transgender-comedian-blasts-dave.html

---

A voting integrity group, led by former GOP Senator Kelly Loeffler, is demanding transparency regarding $5.6 million donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office last year that was spent on the hotly contested 2020 presidential election.
Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan spent a total of $45 million in Georgia during the 2020 election cycle, which included the January 2021 Senate runoff, and a watchdog group reported in June that it noticeably boosted Democrat turnout in the Peach State.

The Foundation for Government Accountability contends the grant money, given through the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), in Georgia and across the country was heavily weighted toward Democratic-leaning counties. While billed as election safety grants during the coronavirus pandemic, only a small portion in any of the states the foundation examined was used for personal protective equipment.

Sen. Kelly Loeffler greets supporters during a Republican election-night watch party, Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)
The CTCL gave about four times more in the Zuckerberg-financed grants to blue counties in Georgia as it gave to red counties, according to the FGA analysis.
For the 2020 election, the CTCL gave about $29 million in grants to Georgia counties that Biden won, with a rate of $7.13 per registered voter. By contrast, the center gave $2.3 million in grants — averaging $1.91 per registered voter — to counties that Trump won. The counties getting the most in the lead-up to the presidential election were Fulton, Cobb and DeKalb.

TOPSHOT - Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg looks on during the VivaTech (Viva Technology) trade fair in Paris, on May 24, 2018. (Photo by GERARD JULIEN / AFP) (Getty Images)
"The Zuckerberg funding is an unprecedented example of using government employees and government resources to put your finger on the scale, to affect the election outcome," Tarren Bragdon, CEO of the Foundation for Government Accountability, told Fox News. "It would be like giving private money to police departments to have officers do more stop and frisk in certain neighborhoods compared to other neighborhoods. It would be like giving money to the tax department to do increased audits in certain zip codes or neighborhoods versus other neighborhoods."
Overall, Zuckerberg spent $350 million in the leadup to the 2020 election.

 

[Apollonian]

Fulton County: Massive Last-Minute Order of over 1M Ballots Discovered​

• by: Kevin Moncla
• 2021-10-25
• Source: UncoverDC

Link: https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/25/fu...t-minute-order-of-over-1m-ballots-discovered/

Fulton County: Massive Last-Minute Order of over 1M Ballots Discovered

FULTON COUNTY, GA—Ever since the 2020 general election, there have been countless details, facts and records uncovered which suggest that whatever happened on November 3rd was not acceptable. As the “non-existent” evidence of nefarious election manipulation mounts in swing states, the surprises coming from Georgia are unbelievable, and the scope of election “mismanagement” is shocking. Each situation is far worse than what we would have ever thought possible.
Recently, UncoverDC reported that Fulton County paid Dominion nearly $2,000,000 to essentially staff and run their voting systems for the 2020 general election. The reason for this was because much of the County election staff was quarantined, presumably due to contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19.
While investigating election-related invoices for the article mentioned above, other expenses raised suspicion. One of the funding lines showed a payment to Runbeck Election Services for $223,360.90. (Readers are likely familiar with Runbeck as the company that printed and mailed the ballots for Maricopa County, AZ.). An Open Records Request for Runbeck initially returned “No Responsive Records”:

It wasn’t until another request was made detailing the amount and specific number of the purchase order that Fulton County finally produced the following document:

While the invoice seems innocuous and innocent, (a county simply ordered the printing of ballots for an election) context and timing reveal that there is much more to this than meets the eye.
It’s important to understand that Georgia has two types of voting and two types of ballots. First, is “in-person” voting which takes place on Dominion voting machines (called Ballot Marking Devices or “BMD’s”) that print the entire ballot and voter’s selections on blank 8 ½ X 11” Vote-secure paper (Left below). Second, is Absentee/By-Mail voting which is on a much larger, 18” long printed ballot (Right below). The quote above is for the latter, 18” ballots.

Fulton County, along with nearly every other county in Georgia, participated in a program through the Georgia Secretary of State’s office in which ballots were printed and mailed directly to the voter. The document below describes the program:

Here’s how it worked: voters would request an Absentee by Mail Ballot by filling out a form and mailing it to the county, or doing the same thing online through the county/Georgia Secretary of State website. The information would then be submitted to the printing company who would print the ballot and mail it directly to the voter.
The program received its final ballot orders on October 16, 2020. Then, counties had to facilitate the printing and mailing of only a small number of ballots requested from October 17 until the cut-off date at the end of the month.
The Runbeck ballot order was in addition to, and separate from, the Secretary of State’s ballot printing and mailing program. The massive 17-pallet order of 770,210 Absentee by Mail ballots was delivered to the county on October 24, 2020.
There’s more. Attempting to gain a thorough understanding and through a persistent series of Open Records Requests, we received the following Invoice from Fulton County.

It is important to note that the order from Fidlar for an additional 288,700 ballots was shipped on October 20, 2020. Based upon the date shipped, the order was presumably made around the same time as the Runbeck order.
Combined, the two orders total a whopping 1,058,210 ballots!
The images below, taken shortly after the election, are from the Fulton County warehouse and only show a small fraction of the actual ballots ordered. The pictures have been circulating on the internet for some time, but the details and context surrounding the ballots were not fully understood.
[gallery type="slideshow" size="full" td_select_gallery_slide="slide" ids="32125,32124,32122"]
With just 10 days until the November 3rd election, there was literally no way to sort, prepare, fold, stuff and mail out the ballots before the election. Especially considering there were no envelopes ordered. This fact alone removes any possibility that they intended to mail the ballots.
After sharing the Runbeck ballot order quote with others in search of answers, one of them posted it on Twitter, to which Gabriel Sterling responded:

Mr. Sterling’s explanation for the order sounds logical and plausible. Because of a problem that was discovered with the Dominion software, an update had to be installed on each of the thousands of voting machines across the state. Due to the resulting delay, there simply wasn’t enough time to perform the proper (and legally required) Logic and Accuracy Testing. Although COVID-19 may have exacerbated the problem, the core issue that caused the delay was a Dominion software failure.
A voter integrity group called Coalition for Good Governance who had been in a long-running court battle against the use of the voting machines and the Secretary of State brought the matter before the court. Because the voting machines had not been properly tested, the court could have prohibited them from being used for the election, thereby creating a situation in which voters would have had to hand-mark the absentee ballots.
It is this potential scenario for which Sterling claimed was the reason for the ballot order; however, a closer look at the record proves otherwise.
First, the issue of Logic and Accuracy Testing he claims precipitated the ballot order had already been settled by a court decision on Sunday, October 11, 2020. Judge Amy Totenberg found that the voting machines had not been tested in accordance with Georgia law but decided that the court was not prepared to prevent the voting machines from being used and deferred to the Secretary of State about the testing. Specifically, her decision stated:
“Recognizing that early voting starts on October 12, 2020 and the imminence of the November 3, 2020 general election, the Court must defer to the Secretary of State's Office and State Board of Elections determination of whether additional measures are pragmatically feasible at this juncture to strengthen the scope of L & A preparations for a general election with a huge anticipated turnout. As L & A testing has already commenced on BMD equipment to be deployed at early voting locations, the Court is not prepared to issue a ruling on the L & A testing issue purely standing on its own.”
Following the ruling of the court, early voting began the very next day using the BMD voting machines Gabriel Sterling claimed were at issue. The fact is they weren’t. The matter of Logic and Accuracy Testing was decided by the court on Sunday, BMD voting machines were used by early voters on Monday and the ballots weren’t ordered until days later—on Friday.
In other words, at the time of the orders, Fulton County was already well aware that any questions surrounding the use of the machines had already been settled because they were already in use!

Sterling’s explanation doesn’t pass the smell test for a second and separate reason. According to the Secretary of State’s website, Fulton County’s total number of ALL votes cast in the general election (including absentee, early and election day voting) was 528,777. One week before the ballot order, on October 8th, Fulton County Elections Director, Rick Barron, reported to the Fulton County Board of Elections that 183,915 ballots had already been mailed to Fulton County voters. Therefore, even if the court had ruled against the Secretary of State and prohibited the machines from being used, Fulton County would have only needed little more than a third of the 1,058,210 ballots to accommodate every single voter.
The third strike for Sterling is that no other Georgia Counties ordered significant numbers of extra ballots. In fact, Cobb County and Gwinnett County both confirmed that they only ordered the legally required number of “Emergency Ballots” (10% of active, registered voters in their county) to have on-hand for election day. This is relevant because the legal/court issue Sterling presents as the reason for the Fulton County ballot order would not have just affected Fulton County but the entire state of Georgia.
The three reasons presented above remove any logic and all credibility from Gabriel Sterling’s assertions regarding the last-minute ballot order.
The fact is, we still don’t have a clear understanding or justifiable reason for why Fulton County would order so many ballots. Consider the fact that with the massive number of absentee ballots ordered and received, one could have replaced nearly all 1.1 million absentee ballots cast in the entire state of Georgia (hint, hint).
More to come soon.

 

[Apollonian]

Georgia Judge Allows Challenge to Dominion Voting Machines to Continue​

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Link: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2023/11/georgia-judge-allows-challenge-to.html/

A long-standing lawsuit over the reliability and security of Georgia’s elections system will go to trial in January.
The case was filed by voters who want hand-marked paper ballots to replace the existing system of machines sold to the state by Dominion Voting Systems, although as noted by the Associated Press, it began three years before the allegations over Dominion’s machines that became part of the contentious aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.
On Nov. 10, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg issued a ruling rejecting the state’s position that no trial was necessary. The ruling called for the state and its critics to try to resolve their differences without a trial.

“The Court cannot wave a magic wand in this case to address the varied challenges to our democracy and election system in recent years, including those presented in this case,” she wrote.
“But reasonable, timely discussion and compromise in this case, coupled with prompt, informed legislative action, might certainly make a difference that benefits the parties and the public,” she wrote.

But that seems unlikely.
“The court’s order makes it clear that Georgia’s status quo is far too risky, and that these concerning issues merit a trial. We look forward to prevailing at trial as we demonstrate why touchscreen BMDs (ballot-marking devices) cannot be used safely,” said Marilyn Marks, executive director for the Coalition for Good Governance, one plaintiff suing the state, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
David Cross, an attorney for some plaintiffs, said the court ruling noted “a long story of incompetence, conflicting claims, and misinformation.”
Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs seemed disinclined for a chat.
“We don’t negotiate with election deniers,” Fuchs said. “If they have an idea that wouldn’t take Georgia back to the days of hanging chads and stuffed ballot boxes, they should offer it.”
Amid the 135 pages of her ruling, Totenberg pushed back against labeling the plaintiffs.
“The Court notes that the record evidence does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation’s leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs’ case in the long course of this litigation,” she wrote.
One report was filed by Alex Halderman, a computer science professor at the University of Michigan.
His report, produced in 2021, said Georgia’s system “suffers from critical vulnerabilities that can be exploited to subvert all of its security mechanisms,” according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Halderman said anyone with physical access to a voting machine had the capability to alter votes on the machine, and that someone who accessed the election management system could do more than change one machine.
According to the Associated Press, the state has said it will not install a software update that could address the issues raised by Halderman.
Gabriel Sterling, chief operating officer in the Secretary of State’s office has mocked Halderman’s conclusions as “hypothetical scenarios that can’t work.”
But those pushing for change say just going to trial shows there is a problem.
“We look forward to presenting our full evidence at trial and obtaining critical relief for Georgia voters,” Cross said. “But we hope this decision will be a much-needed wakeup call for the Secretary and SEB, and finally spur them to work with us on a negotiated resolution that secures the right to vote in Georgia.”

 

[Apollonian]

Georgia case arguing use of electronic voting violated voters' rights, opened election to vulnerabilities, heads to trial in 2024​

Link: https://thepostmillennial.com/georg...es-heads-to-trial-in-2024?utm_campaign=64483/

The plaintiffs argue the machines could impact voters' ability to effectively cast their ballots, which would be in violation of the United States Constitution.

Comment Below

Katie DaviscourtSeattle WA
Nov 13, 20234 Minute Read

A federal judge in Georgia has set a trial date for the case on whether the state's voting machines are prone to cybersecurity issues. The plaintiffs argue that the machines could impact voters' ability to effectively cast their ballots. This would be in violation of the United States Constitution.

US District Court Judge Amy Totenberg set the bench trial date for Jan. 9, 2024. The lawsuit was filed by the Coalition for Good Governance, which is an election integrity advocacy group, and several individual voters. The plaintiffs are requesting the use of hand-marked paper ballots in place of electronic voting machines on grounds that the machines, which are made by Dominion, are susceptible to cybersecurity issues, according to Newsmax.

The plaintiffs hoped to come up with a resolution without the need for a trial, but Judge Totenberg issued a ruling on Friday and said: "The Court cannot wave a magic wand, in this case, to address the varied challenges to our democracy and election system in recent years, including those presented in this case. But reasonable, timely discussion and compromise in this case, coupled with prompt, informed legislative action, might certainly make a difference that benefits the parties and the public."

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and members of the State Election Board are named as defendants in the suit.

The lawsuit included an expert report that detected weaknesses in the Georgia election system. As a result, a federal cybersecurity agency issued an advisory to jurisdictions utilizing the equipment. Furthermore, the report prompted certain Georgia Republicans to advocate for the abandonment of the voting machines altogether.

Additionally, it exposed a vulnerability in election equipment in a remote county in south Georgia, which led to the indictment of former President Donald Trump and eighteen other people in Fulton County on criminal charges.

The state of Georgia has been in the national spotlight since the 2020 presidential election, following claims that the Dominion voting machines allegedly malfunctioned and improperly tabulated ballots, with some Republican voters claiming it resulted in a "stolen election."

Republicans have been criticized as "conspiracy theorists," but Judge Totenberg made it clear in her ruling, according to Newsmax, that the case "does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation's leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs' case in the long course of this litigation."

The activists believe that, among other issues with the election process, voters are unsure if the barcode that the scanner reads truly reflects their choices. They claim that a large number of voters also neglect to review the human-readable portion, which prevents effective audits.

J. Alex Halderman, an expert witness for the plaintiffs and computer scientist at the University of Michigan, analyzed Dominion voting equipment and found flaws that he said might be used by malicious parties.

He claims that, in January 2021, a computer forensics team hired by Trump associates took data and software from election equipment in Coffee County, Georgia, and transmitted it to an unidentified number of people, increasing the risks already associated with those vulnerabilities.

A software upgrade intended to fix those vulnerabilities will not been installed by the state in advance of the 2024 Presidential Election, citing the impracticability of updating all equipment by that date.

Attorneys for the election officials have maintained that the state takes numerous precautions to ensure the integrity of its electoral system and that no election system is without vulnerabilities.

Judge Totenberg said in the ruling that even if she were to side with the plaintiffs, she couldn't order the state to implement a paper ballot system. However, the judge said that there are "pragmatic, sound remedial policy measures" she can order the state to adopt which could include eliminating QR codes on ballots and having scanners read human-legible text; using a broader scope and number of election audits; and implementing essential cybersecurity measures and policies recommended by leading experts, according to the network.

There will be no jury, since the Jan. 9 trial will be a bench trial.

 

[Apollonian]

BREAKING: Now There’s Proof! Brad Raffensperger Lied to President Trump When He Told Him in Jan 2021 Phone Call There Was No Fraud in 2020 Election​

By Jim Hoft Dec. 28, 2023 8:15 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...eres-proof-brad-raffensperger-lied-president/

President Trump made an infamous call with SOS Brad Raffensperger and SOS Official Jordan Fuchs, who later lied to the WaPo about the contents of the call. She was caught when the original recording of the call was found deleted on her computer.
In late December 2020, President Trump made a call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asking him to look at some of the items that were uncovered by his auditor.
There was plenty of evidence for a competent auditor or any man of integrity to know that the election was uncertifiable.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger’s office secretly recorded the phone call with President Trump, then lied about its contents later when they leaked it to the far-left Washington Post.

Raffensperger’s office ran to the Washington Post and leaked a fraudulent transcript of the call.

After they were caught lying to the American public, The Washington Post outed Jordan Fuchs as their anonymous source for the garbage hit piece.
Gold, Faith, and Financial Freedom — How A Faith-Based Company Is Transforming Retirement Portfolios
Fuchs provided the WaPo with a fraudulent Trump quote that the paper ran in an anti-Trump hit piece on January 9th.
They planned this to do the most damage to President Trump before the sham impeachment trial in the US Senate.

Georgia Chairman of the Republican Party David Shafer later revealed that Raffensperger and Fuchs lied to the Washington Post about Trump, demanding that they “find the fraud.”
Then, after they leaked their version of the story to the Washington Post, they deleted the audio of the call.
The audio file was later found in the laptop’s “trash” folder.

From the Washington Post:

Correction: Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator. The recording revealed that The Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source. Trump did not tell the investigator to “find the fraud” or say she would be “a national hero” if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Ga., asserting she would find “dishonesty” there. He also told her that she had “the most important job in the country right now.” A story about the recording can be found here. The headline and text of this story have been corrected to remove quotes misattributed to Trump.

This shows who Trump was dealing with in Georgia!
But that is not all.

That was NOT the only lie made by Brad Raffensperger related to that infamous phone call.
Catherine Engelbrecht and True the Vote published their report titled “The Aftermath” in August on the organization’s broader work in Georgia before, during, and after the 2020 presidential election.
The Aftermath report was published on August 21, 2023.

The Aftermath focused on the impact the dirty voter rolls had on the 2020 Georgia presidential election. Following the report, Democrat hitman Marc Elias filed a lawsuit against True the Vote for their efforts to clean up the voter rolls in Georgia. The Biden DOJ recently joined the Elias case against True the Vote.

**Please donate to True the Vote to support their outstanding work.​

The Aftermath report confirmed that Brad Raffensperger lied to President Trump about the 2020 election in Georgia in that infamous phone call.
Trending: WAYNE ROOT: What Happens In Vegas, Is Proof Democrats are Crooked Communist Traitors Everywhere
Raffensperger told President Trump that the election in Georgia was clean when he knew, in fact, that this was not the case.

Catherine Engelbrecht proved this later when she released a legal affidavit on her meeting with Raffensperger in early December 2020.
Catherine noted that she told Raffensperger in December 2020 that there were 67,284 votes cast that should likely not have been counted because the voters’ registrations were ineligible based on permanent change of residency.
But Brad Raffensperger lied to President Trump about fraudulent voter registrations on that Jan. 2nd call. Raffensperger said everything was fine when he knew otherwise!

From Catherine’s affidavit:

On that call, President Trump asked about inaccurate voter records. Both Secretary Raffensperger and General Counsel Ryan Germany stated that they had fully evaluated the various claims of election irregularities and said without qualification there was no evidence to support them, including no problems with the voting records. This statement was knowingly false. Both men were well-aware of that falsity at the time.
Sec of State Brad Raffensperger knew Georgia’s voter rolls had not been cleaned in approx two years. This would naturally cause skyrocketing errors of over 20% ineligible records across the state, based on residency alone.
In mid-December 2020, well after the General Election had been certified by Raffensperger, and in advance of True the Vote’s preparation of 364,000 voter record challenges based on ineligible residency, Catherine Engelbrecht met with Raffensperger to discuss the challenges citizens would soon be filing. His comment? ‘That seems about right. The GOP should have been doing this all along.” He knew the rolls were inaccurate. What was his excuse for not maintaining them? In 2019, Stacey Abrams and Fair Fight filed a lawsuit against the state to prevent voter roll maintenance, arguing that roll cleaning was erroneous and racially biased. The State went on to win the lawsuit in 2021, but during the period from 2019 to 2021 Raffensperger acquiesced to Abrams.

Mail ballots, drop boxes, no ID requirements, no monitoring, all catalyzed by inaccurate voter records. What actions were taken in 2020 to prevent illegal votes from being cast? Were any eligibility checks done before Georgia’s vote count was certified?
When Raffensperger asserted to President Trump that there was no election fraud, what was he basing that assertion on? If he didn’t know of the stats listed above, then he wasn’t doing his job. If he did know, then he was complicit. In either case, his assertion was untrue.
If the election had been lawfully conducted, votes from all ineligible voter records should have been challenged, with votes cast provisionally, only to be counted if proof of eligible residency could be provided.

Georgia’s lack of voter roll maintenance, together with rules that lowered identification standards for mail-in and inactive records, created an expressway for fraud.
Make no mistake, this is not the only problem with our elections, but inaccurate voter rolls are where election fraud begins.

Catherine and True the Vote published her affidavit that confirms Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger lied to President Trump during their phone call on Jan. 2, 2021.

Here are the numbers of ineligible votes from the 2020 election via True the Vote’s Aftermath Report.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger knew about these illegitimate numbers in December 2020 but lied to President Trump anyway – insisting the election in Georgia was clean! Raffensperger knew this was not true when he spoke to President Trump in early January 2021.

 

[Apollonian]

Georgia Prepares To Cheat Again In 2024​

A Fulton County election official has sued to see the election records that she's supposed to certify!​

EMERALD ROBINSON
MAY 23, 2024

Link: https://www.emerald.tv/p/georgia-prepares-to-cheat-again-in?utm_source=post-email-title/

A new lawsuit was just filed against Fulton County Board of Elections (and its Elections Director Nadine Williams) by sitting member Julie Adams.
Adams has been “unable to get election records necessary to perform their duties in accordance with Georgia law.”
The entire 112-page lawsuit can be found here.
In case you need more background on how corrupt Georgia’s election officials happen to be, here’s my recent article (click image below).

---

Georgia Election Officials Admit To 2020 Fraud​

EMERALD ROBINSON
·
MAY 8

https://www.emerald.tv/p/georgia-election-officials-admit
Read full story

---

Former Trump Spokesperson Liz Harrington summarized the situation this way: “A Fulton County Board of Elections member had to sue her own Board because they will not give the Board members, the people in charge of certifying their elections, any documentation for what they are actually certifying! They claim all authority was delegated to the Fulton County Elections Director based on “bylaws” that do not exist. When certifying elections, they have refused to give Board members things like voter lists and ballot recap sheets so they can check if the numbers even match!”

---

---

Needless to say, it’s more proof that corrupt Georgia officials are planning to steal the 2024 election.
Why else would Fulton County election officials not be allowed to view Fulton County election records?

---

---

You already know what this lawsuit means: the state of Georgia will cheat (again) to deliver its electoral votes to the Biden regime.
The 2024 election will be a repeat of the 2020 election.
And that’s why America is heading for chaos in November.

 

[Apollonian]

Liz Harrington: 20,000 unsubstantiated ballots in GA’s 2020 original results from tabulators that do not exist…​

June 17, 2024 (2 days ago)

Link: https://revolver.news/2024/06/liz-h...al-results-from-tabulators-that-do-not-exist/

Atlanta is now rivaling Chicago in the crooked politicians and election-cheating game. What unfolded in the Peach State during the 2020 election was downright shameful. If we were a serious country, genuinely concerned about our Republic, it would have been rigorously investigated by bipartisan officials from top to bottom. Of course, that never happened. Instead, we were told to shut up, stop being “election deniers,” and cease spreading “conspiracy theories,” even though the election resembled a third-world circus. We hate to say “we told you so,” especially because it shows how far the US has fallen, but this latest data basically confirms the “cheat” was on. And boy, were they crafty—using those mail-in ballots like torpedoes, blowing holes in our election integrity from every conceivable angle. This recent report, highlighting tens of thousands of unsubstantiated ballots, has understandably left many Americans anxious, prompting them to question what has changed since 2020 to prevent another “2020 sham” in the upcoming 2024 election.
Liz Harrington:

There are over 20K unsubstantiated ballots in GA’s 2020 original results from tabulators that “do not exist” according to the Rossi/ @KevinMoncla complaint.
Fulton County provided “proof” they exist.
Except their proof showed they used serial numbers for DIFFERENT machines.
There’s a word for this… Oh yes, fraud.

They claimed there was an ICP3 at the East Point Library during early voting.
Only problem: there were only two scanners there, according to Fulton County’s own checklist.

They did the same thing for a tabulator they claimed was at the South Fulton Service Center polling location. They said there was a third tabulator, when there were only two.

Same thing for Wolf Creek Library.
They invented a fourth tabulator using the serial number of the third tabulator.
No wonder the Secretary of State’s office didn’t release their investigation’s findings to the public. It’s all bogus.

Fulton County’s proof that the 10 missing tabulators existed actually proves they didn’t, and that the results for early voting were tampered with.
Heck of a job, guys.

Sadly, none of this is surprising to those of us who were paying even the slightest bit of attention to the so-called “vote count.” It looked like something straight out of Iran or North Korea, for crying out loud. Remember the #SuitcaseFromHell and that bogus water main break?

Back in 2021, Alex Shepherd posted this on Twitter:

Many control sheets for absentee ballot batches counted during the state’s audit did not check a box indicating the ballot came from a secure container, raising the possibility that ballots were stored insecurely or that multiple batches of ballots were sealed in one container
Check out what a second Georgia state official said: “An audit is only as good as the data that’s input, and in this case Fulton County’s records are so problematic I’m not sure a reasonable person can trust them,” There’s more
The same Georgia official said this: “When you add in the reports of ballots magically appearing under tables or being moved out of the counting center, there are legitimate outstanding questions.”

And while the events of 2020 were horrific and transformed our sacred elections into a banana republic free-for-all, there’s still a slew of shenanigans being uncovered in Michigan—a known hotbed for suspected cheating back in 2020.

Many Americans rightly see the 2020 election as an epic breach of trust, perhaps the darkest electoral crime in our nation’s history. We cannot begin to heal until every person involved faces justice. After all, the manipulation involving serial numbers from different machines to hide unverified ballots is downright traitorous. Americans deserve nothing less than total accountability and absolute transparency to restore faith in our shattered electoral process. Without the full truth, our nation’s future hangs in the balance. We won’t survive this in the long run.

 

[Apollonian]

[MUST-READ] Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen​

Link: https://conservativeroof.com/liz-harrington-drops-a-bombshell-on-how-georgia-was-stolen/

Liz Harrington, the longtime spokesperson for former President Donald Trump’s campaign, delivered a crucial analysis of the disputed 2020 Georgia election on The War Room on Wednesday.
This is the most comprehensive investigative piece on the fraudulent election in Georgia to date.
There is no way you can read this thorough analysis and not believe that Georgia was stolen from President Donald Trump in 2020. It took numerous dishonest individuals to make it happen.
How Georgia Was Stolen by Liz Harrington, read on as the story unfolds, paragraph by paragraph:


It was noon on Dec. 3, 2020, and Richard Barron had a problem.
The 2020 Presidential Election results, already declared by the deep state to be the “most secure in American history,” had just undergone a machine recount in Georgia. Fulton County was meeting to certify the results in less than 24 hours, and the then-Elections Director was more than 17,000 votes short.
Joe Biden, a despised corrupt career politician who had been running for president (and failing spectacularly) since 1987, allegedly received the most votes for president in U.S. history, yet simultaneously could only sneak by in Georgia by some 13,558 votes. It didn’t add up, and neither did the numbers in Fulton County. The first machine count had dragged on for days after Nov. 4, the day Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger promised the counting would be finished and President Trump’s over 103,000 vote lead was insurmountable. The 17,234 votes Fulton County had to come up with were important.


“The recount, we concluded that on Wednesday night [Dec. 2],” Barron said at the Fulton Election Board meeting to certify the results. “We submitted our results and then yesterday the state allowed us to do reconciliation. The results changed.”
That was an understatement.
When you have a problem like a 17,000 vote discrepancy in an election you’re claiming was decided by less than 13,000 votes, who do you call? The Elections Group, of course. They seemed to pop up everywhere, out of nowhere, in 2020. Setting up drop boxes and training election officials in Madison, Wisconsin. Programming the machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. Its members briefing CISA on how to “#PROTECT2020.” Protect it from whom?
Barron sent an email to Ryan Macias, of the Elections Group, at 12:13 p.m. There was no subject and nothing in the body of the email, only a file attached, a very important file, entitled, “Batches Loaded Report.”


Three and a half years after that email was sent, the Georgia State Election Board heard the results of an investigation into the recount, and confirmed Fulton County violated election rules.
The evidence brought by independent investigators showed over 20,000 ballots were inserted into both the original results and the second machine count out of thin air. Simply put, Fulton County did not have the paper ballots to justify their original results, and they got caught. Of course, investigators and lawyers from Brad Raffensperger’s Secretary of State office, who handled the investigation into the complaint, claimed otherwise. Don’t worry about the electronic record of the votes (which are counted…electronically), they said, we have the paper ballots — they just won’t let anyone else see them. And Fulton County is seeking to destroy them. Sure, the investigation confirmed there are missing ballot images and duplicate ballots. Were they counted? Who’s to say? It’s not like they could go check the cast vote record and the paper ballots. Oh, wait.
The mantra during the hours-long review of the case at the Georgia State Capitol last month was, “Let’s just move on.” Tell that to President Donald J. Trump and 18 others who Fulton County is trying to put in jail over the 2020 Election.
It was something to behold. The “experts” from the Secretary of State’s office tried to characterize the complainants as plebes and know-nothings, while exposing that they know next to nothing about their own elections. They say what they’re told to say. Despite their efforts to discredit the complaint, they were forced to admit the truth: Fulton County does not have supporting documentation to back up its election results in 2020.
Charlene McGowan, the general counsel for the Secretary of State, admitted as much when she said ballot images are “part of the paper trail that we use to confirm the accuracy of the results.”
All in-person votes in Fulton County, roughly 375,000, have no ballot images from the original results, and, according to the complaint, there are 17,852 missing ballot images from the recount. Statewide, there were 1.7 million ballot images missing or destroyed after the Election. By McGowan’s own admission, Georgia does not have a paper trail to justify its results.
McGowan confirmed ballot images are still missing, and duplicate ballots were scanned, they just didn’t bother to check if they were counted, which would have been easy to do since they were given a list of the exact ballots with corresponding batch numbers. They didn’t want to have to reveal the answer. According to the cast vote record, they were.
The Secretary of State’s office passed the blame off to Fulton County, which they said “used improper procedures” during the machine recount. They never addressed how it was their own office that ordered Fulton to reconcile the count when it was off by over 17,000. Yes, Fulton County did send its results to an outside group, but that was okay because he was a paid consultant, according to a memorandum the state investigators did not produce publicly. It was the same for all their claims. Nothing was made public, and the complainants were not allowed to address the board, outside a two minute public comment period. Investigate yourselves, keep the findings hidden, and allow no rebuttal. Nice work if you can get it.
Even the newly-appointed Republican Board member Rick Jeffares, hand-picked by Lt. Governor Burt Jones, was conveniently missing from the proceedings, leaving Dr. Janice Johnston the sole member to ask tough questions and offer motions for accountability, none of which were seconded.
The rest of the Board seemed content, along with Fulton County and the Secretary of State, to brush the whole thing under the rug.
“There is a concept called res judicata, which is the civil equivalent of double jeopardy,” said Sara Tindall Ghazal, a Democrat Board member, wincing, when the fact that the hand count audit, which was the second count of the ballots, also included thousands of duplicates and false Biden votes, was brought up. “We have already heard this. It has been done. It is finished.”
The only problem is, no one has been held accountable or prosecuted once over the stolen 2020 Presidential Election, let alone twice, except, of course, those who objected to it. And if America is to have free and fair elections again, the matter is far from over.
Case Number 2023-025
It has been nearly 2 years since Joseph Rossi and Kevin Moncla sent an official complaint to the State Election Board, revealing Fulton County had “no physical ballots” for the votes it added to the recount. In all, Rossi, a retired PepsiCo executive and chemical engineer, and Moncla, an independent investigative journalist, discovered there were at least 42,000 votes in the certified count of the 2020 Presidential Election that have no actual paper trail, including duplicate votes, and over 20,000 from tabulators that “do not exist.”
Rossi and Moncla are emblematic of the countless patriots who have dedicated their lives since November 2020 to getting transparency and accountability to America’s voting systems. That transparency and accountability is sorely lacking in Georgia, and in Fulton County, in particular. Election after election, Georgia certifies and re-certifies results that are tangential to reality. Close races turn into unbelievable landslides, and landslides turn into unbelievably close results. Outcomes are flipped, and only discovered if you’re lucky enough to get a real hand count. Years after the fact, it might come out that Fulton County’s results were “incomplete,” or they will cop to a consent order (the underlying facts of which reveals they counted at least 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden), and agree to “implement written policies” and “train all of its election staff.” But nothing ever changes. The results are whatever they say they are, regardless of the facts and evidence.
The evidence shows President Trump won Georgia. That was a problem for the powers that be, so the count was dragged out, and results were exchanged in order to create margins necessary for Biden to overcome a landslide defeat. When by 5 p.m. on Election Day in Atlanta only 14,152 people had showed up to vote, they knew they had a problem. That’s the turnout equivalent of filling a dozen circles at a campaign rally. They were not going to have the votes to overcome President Trump’s massive lead, even with their drop box stuffing on the front end, and their “QR Code mismatch” error, skimming rural Republican votes off the top. This is why there are no ballot images for in-person voting in Fulton County. This is why they kept scanning late at night after observers had left, “so the number would go up.” This is why none of the early in-person votes were witnessed to and signed, why their machine seals were broken, the memory cards swapped out, and their “results” were printed on different tabulators. This is why the records they do have show 4,000 absentee ballots were scanned at the exact same time. This is why after three counts, they ended up with three different results. And this is why the last two, both the hand count audit and the certified second machine count, had to rely on thousands of duplicate votes in order to try to replicate their first bogus result.

Rossi and Moncla’s complaint makes this obvious. The State Election Board assigned case number SEB2023-025 to the complaint in April 2023. After slow-walking the investigation for months, it was finally set to be heard on December 19, when at the eleventh hour it was pulled from the Board meeting’s agenda. Raffensperger’s general counsel took the investigation over, and five months later, the Secretary of State’s office was finally ready to unveil its cover up.
‘It Did Not Come Up With the Same Number…’
Results of the second machine count were due by midnight on Dec. 2, 2020. Fulton County announced it had completed the recount at 12:52 a.m. But they didn’t have enough ballots. Twelve hours later, Barron was sending the insufficient totals to someone who was not an employee of Fulton County, the Secretary of State, or any office in the state of Georgia. Instead, he was sending the results, which came nowhere close to matching the original count, to the “Elections Group,” a shadowy outfit that showed up in 2020 in very select places that happened to be the most important election offices in the country.

By 11:15 p.m. the next evening, the news media was reporting there were “about 3,200 votes outstanding” in Fulton County, a number eerily close to the 3,125 duplicates that would end up in the final count. The Batches Loaded Report — which contains the actual results as recorded as the votes are scanned — from the same day showed a 17,234 ballot shortfall. The media was checking the results on the Secretary of State’s website, which hadn’t been “updated since earlier in the evening.” But where were these numbers coming from, if not the Batches Loaded Report, which is what Dominion uses to total the results, and shows when they were loaded into the server? Perhaps it was a second Batches Loaded Report, obtained by Moncla via a public records request for the Recount Batches Loaded Report, that showed Fulton County had managed to add over 16,000 votes to the total, but yielded yet a different result, at 527,741 votes, than the 511,543 of the first report, and the 527,925 Fulton County ultimately certified. As Dr. Johnston said, “I would think that the third count…that took those very same ballots, and ran them through the big [ImageCast Central] ICC fast scanners, should have come up with the same number, and it did not come up with the same number.”
This second Batches Loaded Report shows 13,000 early in-person votes were scanned between 10 p.m. and midnight on Dec. 2. But that’s impossible, according to the Batches Loaded Report Barron sent to Macias. Those votes were not there, and it was processed at 12:06 p.m. on Dec. 3, after those votes were supposedly scanned. Someone was fudging the numbers.
‘I didn’t go that far with this.’

**Read more of this HERE** [see https://warroom.org/how-georgia-was-stolen/]

 

[Apollonian]

Software Expert: Thousands of Duplicate Ballots Were Counted in Georgia 2020 Election (VIDEO)​

By Jim Hoft Jul. 9, 2024 5:00 pm

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...sands-duplicate-ballots-were-counted-georgia/

[see vids at site link, above]

On Tuesday software expert Phillip Davis testified that thousands of duplicate ballots were counted in the 2020 election in Georgia today in front of the State Election Board Committee in Georgia.
Davis testified on how election workers were cheating by counting ballots numerous times using different tabulators.

Phillip Davis: You’ll see that they took batches from tabulator 794, batches 8 through 11. They brought it to tabulator 791. They then started grabbing pieces of those four batches. And with those four pieces, they met up brand new batches for tabulator 794. Some of the ballots were in reverse order. They were from multiple batches. In the very first one, you can see that they took batch 22, 20 ballots in reverse, batch 23, four ballots in normal order, batch 20, 10 ballots in reverse, batch 23, five more ballots, and so on. This pattern repeats over and over for tabulator 794…
…We see the exact same pattern repeated with a different set of ballots. So once again, they got ballots from tabulator 791. They grabbed four sets of batches. They did create a brand new batches by picking and choosing pieces out of those other batches to make the new batches… That would be tabulator 74 batches 20 through 26.

This was happening in Georgia during the 2020 election. Joe Biden “won” the state by 11,779 votes after Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger promised on November 4 that the counting would be finished and President Trump’s over 103,000 vote lead was insurmountable.

When you count ballots multiple times in a state anything can happen.

Davis went on to testify that there were 3,030 duplicate ballots counted in Fulton County Georgia in the machine recount.
Via Liz Harrington.

The full presentation by Phillip Davis is linked below.