Here's perfect evidence/demonstration of hold/control over stupid, lib.s & scum possessed by globalist-satanists, suckers--we're in serious trouble

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
These liberals/leftist scum, financed by the globalist-satanists who control the US Fed. Reserve counterfeiting scam which issues nearly endless currency (not real money) are soooo incredibly stupid and ignorant, yet they get elected by the dumb puke, called "the people," and write these treasonous, un-constitutional laws. Such treasonous filth must be exterminated--by finding them guilty of treason in writing these un-constitutional laws--it can be done. First, there needs be a resurrection of the REAL, anti-satanist, hence anti-semitic, Christianity, then secession of the states, de-activation of this stinking imperial Jew S A.

 
Last edited:

WEF AI to Decide What Industries to Liquidate to "Stop Economic Growth"

Enjoy Your Universal Income, Stop Working, and Shut Up​

By Igor Chudov
Igor's Newsletter
September 2, 2022

Link: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/09...ustries-to-liquidate-to-stop-economic-growth/

A brand new video from the World Economic Forum’s agenda article! The agenda is to stop growth and decide what industries to shut down.

Some very juicy quotes from the video (with timestamps)
4.23: Some economists think the solution is to reengineer our economies completely. They make the case that what we should really be doing is weaning ourselves from the addiction to growth and shifting to a post-growth economy (later defined as liquidation of various industries — I.C)
Instead of growing, WEF wants us to focus on what we “really need” (according to WEF)
4:46 things like renewable energy, healthcare, and public transportation. To do that, economists think that rich countries should do something like guarantee living wages.
They are talking about unearned “universal basic income” because the next cut shows a sad-looking lonely person spending a day not working. It promises that people will not be needing jobs to “earn their living or get healthcare”:
e74b5100-be37-4975-a09e-7b0fa7457f5a_1099x618-620x349.webp

What is the goal? To scale down production of things deemed less necessary! (sic)
09434ecc-042c-44a4-968f-101f08712c5a_1104x624-620x350.webp

WEF asks if we could “do away with entire industries”, showing an anxious, sweaty man worried about his industry being shut down:
0c19bd79-5900-4e9f-b7bc-d627c8697bb4_1105x624-620x350.webp

How would we decide what is unnecessary, asks the voice prompter. How would we resolve our disagreements? How to make these decisions?

Read the Whole Article [see https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/w...ustries?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email/]
 
Race and the Decline of American Justice

PETER BRADLEY • APRIL 26, 2024

Link: https://www.unz.com/article/race-and-the-decline-of-american-justice/

[see vid at site link, above]



Lawfare — using the legal system against political opponents — is now a common leftist tactic. It’s effective. Just last month, VDARE.com announced it is effectively shutting down operations after 25 years. Perhaps more than any other site, VDARE has spotlighted how America’s immigration policy leads to demographic disaster. Its shuttering would be a huge loss, especially in light of the border crisis that threatens to sweep away what remains of traditional America.
It is not just VDARE facing lawfare by George Soros-backed prosecutors such as New York Attorney General Leticia James. The National Rifle Foundation (NRA) and — most famously — Donald Trump are in their crosshairs. Unlike VDARE, Mr. Trump and the NRA have the resources and influence to at least fight back. VDARE was not even charged with anything, but has had to spend nearly $1 million as Miss James “investigates” real estate agreements regarding a property in West Virginia. VDARE has only two full-time employees and an annual budget of $800,000.
If this campaign is successful, all dissidents could face similar attacks. The Left will not stop with VDARE.

The judiciary was historically the most admired and respected branch of the US government and all Americans are supposed to be protected by the Constitution. What happened?
The legal clash
Wilmot Robertson noted the decline of the US judiciary over 50 years ago. His classic work The Dispossessed Majority (1972) has a section called “The Legal Clash” that explores how whites lost control of a system they had built.
Robertson believed that law first developed from tribal customs. Knowing their people’s fear of the supernatural, tribal chiefs claimed divine guidance for laws they laid down. As societies grew complex, laws regulated more and more behavior, and a diversity of people means a diversity of customs and attitudes. Robertson wrote:
The more minority influence has been brought to bear on the American legal system, the more breakdown is becoming apparent. The English common law, which derived from Northern European folk law, functioned adequately, at the times superbly, in the United States as long as the nation was dominated by people of English and Northern European descent. But when minorities became an important element in both the law-making and law-breaking process, American law underwent a deep transformation. . . . [T]he law is not an abstract set of principles equally applicable to all men, but an organic part of a people’s culture, with a style and form unique to its culture.
What made Anglo-American law unique? Robertson cites the notion of personal rather than collective guilt, something rarely found among non-whites. As the legal system became more diverse, the individual became part of a group, and by the 1960s, jury trials involving blacks had become a farce. Robertson lists many cases of black jurors refusing to convict obviously guilty blacks who had victimized whites. This has only gotten worse over the years and the not-guilty verdict in the O.J. Simpson murder case is a prominent example. The writers of the Constitution would abhor double jeopardy, jury nullification, and lawfare, yet these are now aspects of the US justice system.
Why didn’t the Constitution protect us from these things?
Robertson notes the Framers treated non-whites with “studied indifference.” Black slaves were “other persons” for apportionment, and American Indians were not counted at all. It took a civil war and the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to grant citizenship and other rights to blacks, which shows that the authors of the Constitution meant it to apply only to whites. Even after these amendments, cases such as Civil Rights (1883) and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) granted freedom of association to whites and sanctioned exclusion of blacks.
The judiciary started to diversify throughout the 20th century, with non-whites, non-Christians, and women appointed to the bench. Starting in the 1950s, the Warren Court and later the Burger Court issued a series of defeats for whites as the judiciary moved sharply left. Whites lost all the major civil rights cases of the 1950s and 60s and any hope for a more conservative Supreme Court was dashed as justices (many appointed by Republicans) defended racial preferences in cases throughout the 1970s. There is now only one white Protestant justice (Neil Gorsuch, raised Catholic), meaning any organic link to the framers has been all but severed. Robertson wrote:
Wallowing in the deceptive glow of the liberal-minority Weltanschauung, the Warren court attempted to transform the organic law of Majority America into a code of moral and racial imperatives as inapplicable to the crucial issues of the day as they were unenforceable. The Burger and Rehnquist courts never made any meaningful counter-decisions to reverse the trend. By its ill-timed and ill-conceived reinterpretation of the Bill of Rights and other Constitutional guarantees, the Supreme Court has in effect usurped the legislative function of Congress — a gross abuse of the judicial power as defined by the Constitution.
Many conservatives like to point to the antics of Justices Ketanji Brown and Sonia Sotomayor as evidence of decline, but Robertson lists case after case of much earlier unethical and even illegal behavior by justices. Here are just a few:
  • When he heard about President Kennedy’s assassination, Earl Warren sent out a press release insinuating (wrongly) that the killer was a right-wing racist.
  • Felix Frankfurter and Stanley Reed appeared as character witnesses for Alger Hiss in his 1949 federal trial for perjury.
  • William Douglas received a $12,000 annual payment from the Albert Parvin Foundation while on the Court. The money came from a Las Vegas casino and Douglas refused to resign until it became known that Parvin engaged in many sordid financial dealings with Louis Wolfson, who was under investigation for stock fraud.
  • Abe Fortas was forced to resign in 1969 after it was discovered he was getting $20,000 a year from the same Louis Wolfson.
  • The Court reversed Muhammed Ali’s conviction for draft dodging on a technicality, because it feared black riots.
Robertson writes that the judiciary is most responsible for white dispossession because it was easier to corrupt nine justices than to out-vote or out-legislate a 90-percent-white electorate. This is a view that prominent Dissident Right voices now accept:

In his concluding chapter on the decline of US justice, Robertson cited statistics and horrifying examples of whites killed by black criminals and noted that blacks often do not think they are criminals, but soldiers in a race war. Three of the four main prosecutors targeting Donald Trump with lawfare are black — a fact that makes blacks proud:

Lawfare is a symptom of the decline of US law and the dispossession of whites. A justice system developed by and for white people does not work for an increasingly non-white nation. How could people with no history of individual rights have any reverence for the Constitution or “the white man’s justice”? Scott Greer recently wrote:
Colorblind individualism doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s the result of the unique culture brought here by a particular people. Random individuals didn’t invent fair play, meritocracy, and equality before the law from nothing. It came from the Anglo-Protestant tradition that Europeans assimilated into in America. It’s no wonder whites are the only ones who believe in it.
Solutions?
Robertson offered a solution. He approved of impeaching judges, but thought it would not solve the problem. He called instead for separate legal systems for whites and minorities. Romans had different laws for citizens (jus civile) and non-Romans (jus gentium). In the Middle Ages, England had special laws for foreign merchants. Even the US acknowledges the Napoleonic Code as the state law of Louisiana. Robertson writes:
An ethnic departmentalization of American law would return to the minorities the laws they have lived by for thousands of years, while removing minority members from the jurisdiction of laws they have never learned to live by. . . . Majority law would be a mix of Anglo-Saxon common law and American constitutional law restored to a climate of reason, respect and responsibility and ready to focus once again on what should be its primary purpose — guarding and expanding the Majority’s freedom of action.
Robertson was writing in 1972. Whites are now a fading majority (57 percent, according to the 2020 Census). Does this make separate justice more or less likely?
Many on the Dissident Right criticize Donald Trump. As president, he wasted many opportunities and talked a better game than he played, but a second term may be our best chance for at least slowing lawfare against dissidents, especially white advocates. As one of the main victims of lawfare, Mr. Trump certainly knows how it can be abused. A legal system created by whites is now being used against us by non-whites and leftists. Wilmot Robertson saw this coming half a century years ago.
 
The US Constitution Is Another Victim of Genocide

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS • MAY 2, 2024

Link: https://www.unz.com/proberts/the-us-constitution-is-another-victim-of-genocide/

A 19th century plantation slave suffered less abuse than an American today and was less likely to have his head cracked open by a police baton than a Columbia University Student. Here are the lost rights of Americans from A to Z: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/05...towards-tyranny-how-freedom-dies-from-a-to-z/
Republican US senators are no better friends of the US Constitution than the administrators at Columbia University, Netanyahu and the Israel Lobby, the NYPD, and the whore media. For example, Senator Marsha Blackburn (R, TN) labeled as “terrorists” students who protest against Israel’s destruction of Palestine. In order to protect Israel from students protesting genocide, Blackburn wants the students added to the terrorist watch list and prohibited from flying:
“Any student who has promoted terrorism or engaged in terrorists[sic] acts on behalf of Hamas should be immediately be [sic] added to the terrorist watch list and placed on the [Transportation Security Administration] No Fly List,” Blackburn wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday. https://sputnikglobe.com/20240502/u...ded-to-terrorist-no-fly-lists-1118220031.html The stupid US senator sees the students as acting “on behalf of Hamas” and not on the basis of their moral conscience.
Senator Rick Scott (R, FL) accuses protesting students of violating Israel’s right to commit genocide and wants the US Justice (sic) Department to investigate the students for “conspiring to violate the civil rights of a religious minority.” US senators are falling all over themselves pimping for Netanyahu’s final solution to the “Palestinian Problem.”
One can see American conservatives supporting these demands, not realizing that their own Constitutional rights are in the crosshairs.
Today in America there is no thought. There is only manipulated emotion and the sale of Americans’ honor for campaign contributions. So what does voting fix?
The 21st century began with the George W. Bush’s suspension of habeas corpus on suspicion alone, and American liberty has gone downhill continuously at increasing speed. Only a simulacrum of the country into which I was born remains.
Americans are not permitted to speak freely about Israel. Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs points out the incongruity of a university, whose existence is based on freedom of speech, repressing freedom of speech.
Closing down voices is today the primary function of the Israel Lobby, media, universities and “education” in general. It applies to faculty as well as to students. The Israel Lobby was able to reach into a Catholic university and cancel the tenure awarded to Norman Finkelstein and into the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and cancel the tenured appointment of a recruit from the University of Virginia. One wonders If the Israel Lobby will order Columbia to fire Professor Sachs.
 

Scholz on Holocaust remembrance: 'Our responsibility never ends'​

DPA
Sun, January 19, 2025 at 3:11 PM CST
2 min read

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/scholz-holocaust-remembrance-responsibility-never-211132014.html/

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz attends a commemorative event to mark the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp at the community center of the Jewish community in Frankfurt. Boris Roessler/dpa

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz attends a commemorative event to mark the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp at the community center of the Jewish community in Frankfurt. Boris Roessler/dpa

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday reiterated the importance of commemorating the Holocaust and other horrific crimes committed by the Nazis.
Scholz joined the Jewish community in Frankfurt at an event to mark the upcoming 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
"Not tolerating injustice, never looking away again, saying no: that must be our guiding principle today, 80 years after the liberation of Auschwitz," Scholz said.

The memory of the civilizational breach committed by Germans in the Holocaust must be kept alive and conveyed to every generation again and again, Scholz said.
During the Holocaust, Nazi German perpetrators and collaborators systematically murdered an estimated 6 million Jews. The Nazis also brutalized and murdered members of other minority groups.
"Our responsibility never ends," Scholz emphasized.
The chancellor said anti-Semitism, right-wing extremism, nationalist ideas and sometimes blatant misanthropy are undergoing a frightening and alarming normalization in many places, he said.
"The internet and social networks in particular often become a hotbed for extremist positions, incitement and hatred," Scholz warned.

He warned that this online hatred frequently threatens Jewish people in real life. It is more important than ever to clearly state the facts and draw the right lessons, he added.
"Jewish life, that is Frankfurt. Jewish life, that is Germany. That is us," the chancellor stated.
On January 27, 1945, Soviet troops liberated the survivors of the Nazi's Auschwitz extermination camp in German-occupied Poland.
At the Auschwitz camp alone, the Nazis murdered more than 1 million people, most of them Jews. January 27 has been observed as Holocaust Remembrance Day in Germany since 1996.

Auschwitz survivors to mark 80th anniversary of camp's liberation​

Barbara Erling and Kuba Stezycki
Mon, January 27, 2025 at 12:40 AM CST
2 min read

c1c63854ba1dd49db828cc7d788e4d2c

Nazi German concentration and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau prior to the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the camp in Oswiecim

f544893769afcd4e62438968666426ad

Nazi German concentration and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau prior to the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the camp in Oswiecim

988f449bb03c22a0285bd8d94a80ab97

A barbed wire is seen at the site of the former Nazi German concentration and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau

Auschwitz survivors to mark 80th anniversary of camp's liberation​

1 of 5
Nazi German concentration and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau prior to the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the camp in Oswiecim
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways
By Barbara Erling and Kuba Stezycki
OSWIECIM, Poland (Reuters) - Auschwitz survivors will be joined by world leaders on Monday to mark the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi German death camp by Soviet troops, in what will likely be one of the last such gatherings of those who experienced its horrors.
The anniversary at the site of the camp, which Nazi Germany set up in occupied Poland during World War Two, will be attended by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Britain's King Charles, French President Emmanuel Macron, European Council President Antonio Costa and a host of other leaders.

Israel will be represented by Education Minister Yoav Kisch.
Pawel Sawicki, a spokesperson for the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum and Memorial, said that there would be no speeches by politicians and that leaders would instead be listening to the voices of survivors.
"It is clear to all of us that this is the last milestone anniversary where we can have a group of survivors that will be visible who can be present at the site," he said.
"In ten years it will not happen and for as long as we can we should listen to the voices of survivors, their testimonies, their personal stories. It is something that is of enormous significance when we talk about how the memory of Auschwitz is shaped."

The main commemoration will begin at 1500 GMT in a tent built over the gate to the former Auschwitz II-Birkenau camp. One of the symbols of the anniversary will be a freight train car, which will be placed in front of the gate.
More than 1.1 million people, mostly Jews, perished in gas chambers or from starvation, cold and disease at Auschwitz.
More than 3 million of Poland's 3.2 million Jews were murdered by the Nazis, accounting for about half of the Jews killed in the Holocaust.
Between 1941 and 1945, Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered some six million Jews across German-occupied Europe.
(Reporting by Barbara Erling and Kuba Stezycki; Writing by Alan Charlish; Editing by Stephen Coates)

Holocaust survivor shares story on 80th anniversary of Auschwitz liberation​

Sean Lewis
Sun, January 26, 2025 at 6:20 PM CST
2 min read


SKOKIE, Ill. (WGN) — The Illinois Holocaust Museum celebrated the 80th anniversary of the Auschwitz Concentration Camp liberation by Russian soldiers Sunday afternoon.
The main observance takes place at Auschwitz on Monday in southern Poland, where Nazi troops put more than 1.1 million people. It is estimated more than 17 million people total were killed in the Holocaust.
“The entry gate in Auschwitz is notorious because it had that ironic symbol above it,” said Manfred Goldberg, a 94-year-old Holocaust survivor.

Goldberg is talking about the metal work that was written in German above the entrance, “Arbeit macht frei,” which translates to “Work sets you free.”
“It became realistic that once you walked through that gate, you were under a sentence of death,” Goldberg said.
He was just 13 when he, his mom and his 9-year-old brother were taken as prisoners by Nazi Germany.
“When we finally reached the camp, we each were inspected as to our potential of slave laboring,” Goldberg said. “He decided apparently that I was fit for slave labor and pointed me in the direction of those surviving. My little brother, age nine, did not so he lost his life, he was murdered.”

Goldberg is now one of a dwindling number of survivors still alive.
One of the exhibits at the museum in Skokie are interviews with other survivors. They’re recorded in hologram form, and visitors can ask questions that will then prompt the answers they gave at the time.
“Everything we do is around education and that’s where it starts,” said Rahim Thompson, senior program manager at the Illinois Holocaust Museum. “It’s digestible for anyone who wants to learn. There are so many different ways for so many different age groups.”
It’s an enduring legacy younger generations are racing to preserve, to prevent history from being lost — and worse — repeated.


King to visit Auschwitz on Holocaust Memorial Day​

Daniela Relph - Senior Royal Correspondent and Thomas Mackintosh - BBC News
Sun, January 26, 2025 at 7:12 PM CST
3 min read

King Charles III attends the Sunday service at the Church of St Mary the Virgin, close to the Sandringham Estate. The King is wearing a brown tweed coat, navy suit and a lightly decorated tie. He is looking towards the camera lens from a distance

King Charles will travel to Poland as he continues his cancer treatment [Getty Images]

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways
King Charles will become the first British head of state to visit Auschwitz when he tours the former Nazi concentration camp to mark the 80th anniversary of its liberation.
The King will travel to Poland to join survivors and other dignitaries at a service at the site of the former concentration camp, at the end of which he will lay a light of remembrance o honour those who lost their lives.
Sources close to the King say this is a profound visit for him with one aide describing it as a "deeply personal pilgrimage."

Back in the UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has renewed his commitment to ensure all schools teach pupils about the Holocaust, warning that society must "make 'never again' finally mean what it says".
He will join the Prince of Wales at the official commemorations in London to mark Holocaust Memorial Day.
Holocaust Memorial Day, which takes place on 27 January each year, remembers the six million Jews murdered during World War II.
It also commemorates the millions of people outside of the Jewish faith who were murdered through Nazi persecution and those targeted in more recent genocides.

Auschwitz-Birkenau was the largest Nazi concentration camp and was at the centre of the Nazi campaign to eradicate Europe's Jewish population.
The King has long wanted to be present at Auschwitz for the liberation ceremony not just because of the significance of the anniversary but also to bear witness to the testimony of survivors in the location where so much suffering happened.
A palace source told the BBC: "There is no substitute for paying tribute at the very scene where the horrors took place."
In 1943, the King's grandmother, Princess Alice of Greece, saved a Jewish family by taking them into her home and hiding them in Nazi-occupied Athens - something the King has said brought him and the Royal Family an immense sense of pride.

fff65cd622d86382269d42e05debc4dc

Holocaust memorial chair: Musk’s call for Germany to ‘move beyond’ Nazi guilt is dangerous


During his brief visit to Poland the King will also meet President Andrzej Duda.

Image shows British Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a visit to the memorial and museum of Auschwitz-Birkenau, a former German Nazi concentration and extermination camp, in Oswiecim, Poland, on 17 January 2025

The prime minister visited Auschwitz earlier this month, where he vowed to fight the "poison of antisemitism" [Reuters]

Speaking ahead of the anniversary Sir Keir said while we remember the six million Jewish victims "we must also act", adding he wanted to make teaching young people about the genocide a "national endeavour".
He said: "It happened, it can happen again: that is the warning of the Holocaust to us all.
"The Holocaust was a collective endeavour by thousands of ordinary people utterly consumed by the hatred of difference.
"That is the hatred we stand against today and it is a collective endeavour for all of us to defeat it."

On Wednesday, Sir Keir welcomed a group of survivors and their families to Downing Street, describing the meeting as "an incredible privilege" and praised their "sheer and remarkable courage".
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch spoke of the importance of confronting "the resurgence of antisemitism today" while reflecting on the Holocaust as a "unique evil in human history", in a statement to mark Holocaust Memorial Day.
While Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey urged vigilance in defending "peace, human rights and compassion" and guarding against "antisemitism, hatred, discrimination and oppression".
Additional reporting by Lucy Clarke-Billings.

Never Again means nothing if we are not willing to stand up to today’s Jew haters​

Stephen Pollard
Sat, January 25, 2025 at 2:11 PM CST
3 min read

SWP posters

SWP posters

Monday is Holocaust Memorial Day – and the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. This year, as every year, the phrase Never Again will be at the centre of the commemorations. But more than at any time since 1945, it will be meaningless.
In the 80 years since the end of the Holocaust, Never Again has been uttered as if it is some kind of benediction. Merely to say the words shows you to be a caring, thoughtful and, above all, decent human being. You have seen the previously unimaginable evil of the Holocaust and you are revolted. So, never again.
But rarely has there been a clearer example of how actions speak far louder than words. For most of the past 80 years Never Again has been no more than an abstract expression of goodness. It has carried no real, practical, living meaning because it didn’t need to. Anti-Semitism was almost a historical curiosity – a hatred that had been buried after the Holocaust showed where it could lead.

Today, however, when the threat to Jews is real and clear, Never Again is exposed as a platitude.
Israel has had to fight many existential wars since its creation in 1948. But here in Britain, there was no serious threat to the Jewish community – but a new and worrying wave of Jew hatred started emerging at around the time of the arrival of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader in 2015.
In the past fifteen months, however, anti-Semitism has skyrocketed. Naked and unashamed Jew hate is now a regular feature on the streets of London and elsewhere as hundreds of thousands assemble to demonstrate their loathing of “Zionists” – in other words, of Jews.
The Hamas massacre of October 7 2023 acted not as a brake on the rise in anti-Semitic incidents over the previous decade – a warning of where it could lead – but, rather, as an accelerant. In just the first half of 2024, the Community Security Trust recorded 1,978 instances of assault, extreme violence and threats – up 105 per cent from 2023. Never again?

Accusations of genocide against Israel, which are now commonplace, are a deliberate inversion of the Holocaust, so the actual victims of a genocide are themselves branded as perpetrators – giving license for the community of the good to hate the Jews. The late Rabbi Lord Sacks called anti-Semitism a mutating virus. Today it takes the form of support for the so-called “resistance” to Israel. Calls to “globalise the intifada” mean – and can only mean – kill the Jews.
Indeed, it’s striking how so many of those who have spent the past week attacking Elon Musk over his supposed Nazi salute at President Trump’s inauguration celebration are the very same people who have spent the past 15 months screaming “genocide” – and the very same people who routinely describe Israel as the new Nazis. Far from caring about anti-Semitism, they want it to be easier for Jews to be slaughtered, by banning arms sales to Israel.
If Never Again is to be more than the platitude it has become, it means allowing Jews to defend themselves from those who seek to kill them. In that sense, Holocaust Memorial Day is far more than an annual commemoration of the Shoah. It is a reminder of what happens when the world turns its back on the quest to murder Jews. That is now an urgent reminder.
The threat to Israel from Iran and its proxies, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, has always been clear. What has only really become obvious since October 7 is the deep hold that Jew hate still has even in Britain.

Auschwitz 80 years since liberation: Ryszard Horowitz's story of survival and making the American Dream​

Danuta Hamlin
Sat, January 25, 2025 at 12:30 PM CST
9 min read

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

A film shows a large group of children walking out of Auschwitz concentration camp in the company of nuns. Regina Horowitz recognized her own child and begged the camera operator to give her the frames of the film depicting Ryszard.
There are very few survivors left as the world commemorates the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death camp Auschwitz. The Horowitz family's tale of survival is one such documentation.
The Kraków orphanage would send her Regina Horowitz to another address, where she miraculously found her five-year-old son, who was just as shocked to see his mom alive. And not just her, but also his sister Niusia and his grandmother . . . all three women saved by German industrialist Oskar Schindler.

Holocaust Survivors Can Live On For Generations With Creative Use Of New Technology
Renowned photographer Ryszard Horowitz was born on May 5th, 1939, to a loving family in the historic city of Kraków, the former capital of Poland, but just four months later Nazi Germany invaded Poland, resulting in utter devastation.
The war would turn brutal and sinister, especially for Poland's Jews.
Read On The Fox News App
"When the Germans marched into Kraków," Horowitz told Fox News Digital, "my parents' first reaction was to run away. They packed their suitcases and left me with my non-Jewish nanny, Antosia. But soon they returned with my sister, because they did not want me to stay behind. So, we were reunited but eventually forced to relocate to the ghetto."

The Nazis segregated Jews from the rest of the population, forcing them into Krakow’s notorious ghetto. Life was bleak behind the fences, in constant fear of Nazi persecution.
Fortunately for Ryszard, there was an older boy there, called Roman Liebling, known later as Roman Polanski, who attended his third birthday party. According to Polanski, although food was scarce, by some miracle Ryszard’s mother, Regina, managed to procure hot chocolate for the kids. Ryszard, however, did not care for hot chocolate and refused to drink it.
Tennessee Professor Reveals Story Of Her Late Husband, A Holocaust Survivor, Amid Today's Antisemitism
By 1943, the Germans were liquidating Kraków’s ghetto, and the Horowitz family was forced to relocate to a Nazi concentration camp in Plaszow. It was run by a notorious Nazi commander, Austrian officer Amon Göth.

830dd1dc2956c2d8f5921669bbd34d8b

Family of freed Israeli hostage says 19-year-old 'survived hell'

dpa international
2085ca762872d1877aebd4f4a380c778

Holocaust survivors fear Europe is forgetting the lessons of Auschwitz

BBC
"It was a terrible camp, because the man in charge was an extremely brutal character. He created a tremendous sense of fear. He was shooting people right and left. He was like a God in terms of his power and made life there totally impossible," Horowitz recalled.
Göth liked to throw parties in his villa, where two of Ryszard’s musician uncles were forced to play.
One of the men attending the parties was German industrialist Oskar Schindler. His friendship with Göth enabled him to run a business that would ultimately become a lifeline for many of the camps Jews.
"Oscar Schindler got permission to open a factory producing utensils for the German army, and my family worked there." Horowitz explained.

Steven Spielberg introduced Oskar Schindler to the entire world in his 1993 movie "Schindler's List," and Horowitz shared some observations about the famed businessman.
"Everybody will tell you something else about him. How good he was, how bad he was, how handsome he was, how many women he had, but the bottom line is . . . somehow, he felt this urge to save people. Once, he got into trouble when he kissed my sister when she gave him a cake for his birthday," Horowitz said.
In 1944, the Germans decided it was time to dismantle Plaszow, disguise the traces of their atrocities, and close Schindler’s factory.

'Living Legend': Schumer Honors Centenarian Holocaust Survivor With Capitol Flag, Senate Floor Recognition

"Schindler managed to get permission to move a certain number of workers to his factory in Brünnlitz, in Czechoslovakia," Horowitz said.
Brünnlitz was a German labor camp, and as Spielberg showed in his film, a list was created with names of those who would be relocated there.
"There is no question that there was a list, and my family was on that list. I was not, because I was too small to work, but somehow, I managed to squeeze in. There were two transports, one of men and one of women. I was traveling with my father," Horowitz explained.
Schindler’s men made it to Brünnlitz alive, but Ryszard’s life was about to unravel.

"We waited for the women to follow us to Brünnlitz. But, for some reason, we do not know why, they were sent to Auschwitz concentration camp instead," he said.
Schindler hurried to Auschwitz to rescue his women and left Josef Leipold in charge of his factory.
"Leipold was the exact opposite of Schindler." Horowitz said. "From the beginning, his idea was to finish us off. And he did not want children there. So, he packed us with our fathers and shipped us to Auschwitz."
Upon arriving at Auschwitz, Ryszard was selected to have concentration camp numbers tattooed on his forearm. Which meant he would stay alive, for a time.

Youngest Person Saved By Oskar Schindler: 'I Feel Guilty That I Survived'
Oskar Schindler managed to rescue the women. They were aboard a train that was about to depart for Auschwitz.
Horowitz recalled these heartbreaking moments, "My cousin and I saw the train, and my mother was there, my sister, my grandmother . . . and they saw us. My mother was certain this was the last time she would see me. They went to Brünnlitz, and my father and I remained in Auschwitz."
In January 1945, with the Red Army approaching, German SS forces marched thousands of prisoners out of Auschwitz to different camps on German territory. Richard’s father, Dawid "Dolek" Horowitz, was forced to leave his son behind.

"I think that one of the reasons I survived was that a man in charge of a warehouse, Roman Gunz, agreed to look after me. Sometimes he would feed me, and when things got difficult, he would hide me in the warehouse or inside the infectious hospital ward," Horowitz said.
Then one day, the nightmare of Auschwitz came to an end.
"When the Red Army came close to the camp, the Germans were in a panic. They rounded all the kids up and were ready to shoot us, but just then two German officers arrived on motorcycles screaming to drop everything and follow them, so they did," Horowitz remembered.
A few hours later, Soviet troops entered Auschwitz.

"The Red Army arrived, most of them on horseback," he said. "They gave us food and sweets. They had cameras with them, and they recorded a lot of footage. The following day, nuns arrived and took us to an orphanage in Kraków. Polanski’s aunt Tosia found me there and took me to her apartment on Dluga Street. And Roman was already there."
In March 1945, Brünnlitz was liberated, and the Horowitz women returned to Kraków.
"One day, my mom was out in the market Square, where they were showing a documentary movie about the liberation of Auschwitz, and she recognized me in it," Horowitz said.
The Horowitz women moved in with Roman Polanski’s family. They were soon joined by Dawid Horowitz.
"We all lived under one roof for two years, until my father got us a nice apartment near Market Square," Horowitz said.
After the war, Poles found their country in ruins with a hostile communist regime in charge.
"Most of my closest friends and their families were anti-communists. Everybody’s dream was to get out of Poland as fast as possible," Horowitz explained.
Dawid Horowitz managed to open a store selling tools and building materials, with Polanski’s aunt Tosia as his business partner. Life went on.
"For me and my friends, life was pretty good at the time, because we were not engaged in politics. We were artists, and we believed that we lived in a totally free society, so we did what we wanted to do, and we had this amazing outlet, a cabaret called "Piwnica pod Barnami" (The Cellar under the Rams). And we had jazz," Horowitz recalled.
In 1958, American jazz pianist Dave Brubeck arrived in Kraków to perform. Ryszard Horowitz was there with his camera and documented it in pictures. Little did he know that photography was his future. And that future was on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.
"I had this opportunity because my uncles here in New York were ready to offer me room and board. And I also received a scholarship from the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn," Horowitz said.
With his father’s encouragement and some U.S. dollars hidden in the heel of his shoe, Horowitz boarded the Polish ocean liner "MS Batory."
Life as an immigrant in the Big Apple was a mixed bag. But at the Pratt Institute, Horowitz quickly exhibited a unique talent for photography.
"I created their first photography lab at Pratt, and I was asked to design their 75th anniversary yearbook, which I edited, and I pretty much took all the photographs for them. It was the first time in history that the New York Art Directors Club gave an award to a student. So, this became my portfolio," Horowitz explained.
Ryszard connected with influential people who helped pave his way to success. Among them were photographer Richard Avedon, graphic artist Saul Steinberg and ballet choreographer Sergei Diaghilev, as well as his idol, disc jockey Willis Conover, who hosted the Jazz Hour on the Voice of America.
Through the lens of his camera, Horowitz saw the world somewhat differently. His photographs looked like computer-generated graphics, except that they predated the digital age. He became known as the pioneer of special effects photography.

Full-scale Replica Of Anne Frank's Hidden Annex To Be Unveiled In New York City

"I found a way of reversing perspective and juxtaposing large objects to make them look small and vice versa," Horowitz said.
Horowitz was a master of light. He learned to manipulate light to photograph expensive jewelry and new cars.
"My art education in Kraków helped me – my devotion to the great masters of painting," Horowitz explained.
His iconic commercial work captivated audiences in the world of advertising, bringing him fame and prestigious awards. He received honorary doctorates from the University of Warsaw and Wrocław in Poland, and in 2014, his hometown of Kraków made him an honorary citizen.
"Some of my photographs consist of different images taken in different parts of the world, and they are merged into a single unit that’s not jarring but believable. They appear as though they are an instance of a situation that never existed except in my head. That’s why I call myself a ‘photocomposer," Horowitz explained.
He achieved success in his personal life as well. Since 1974, he’s been happily married to Anna Bogusz, and they have two grown sons: Daniel and Emil.
"I met Ania at a party. She was an architecture student from a Polish family living in Caracas, Venezuela. She was only passing through New York on her way to Paris to continue her studies. She never made it to Paris," Horowitz smiled, recollecting meeting the love of his life.
 
Ho ho ho, here's the latest lies and propaganda campaign of globalist-satanists (who print-up all the currency and own the Jews-media) now pushed by Demon-rat fronts/mouth-pieces: it's "Constitutional crisis" that Trump is cutting-out all the deliberate "waste & abuse"

 

Schumer admits Democrats installed 200+ activist judges to thwart Trump agenda; Chief Justice Roberts linked to anti-Trump judges​

March 21, 2025 12:30 pm by Alex

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/schu...-justice-roberts-linked-to-anti-trump-judges/

[vid at site link, above]

The fact that these judges have repeatedly ruled against Trump and now seem to be operating under the influence of powerful, radical forces should send a chill down every American’s spine. This isn’t justice; this is lawfare.

See also Federal Reserve's inadequate inflation control leaves President Trump to manage economic fallout

See also Excellent move! Trump to sign order making English the official U.S. language


San Francisco crime spirals out of control despite highest-paid police force, officers earning $600K+ a year.

Fitch sees notable increase in private credit defaults—5.7% by February
 

Macron Backs Judiciary Over Le Pen Ban​

by Michael Curzon | The European Conservative April 4th, 2025 5:40 AM

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/macron-backs-judiciary-over-le-pen-ban/

Macron has suddenly become coy about defending French democracy, opting only to speak up for the judges in Le Pen’s case.

Macron Backs Judiciary Over Le Pen Ban
Image Credit: THIBAUD MORITZ / Contributor / Getty

Any hopes Marine Le Pen might have for the appeal against her ban from running for office cannot have been inspired by Emmanuel Macron, who is usually keen to demonstrate his love of democracy, yet on this occasion has been noticeably short of words.

On Wednesday, the president broke his public silence on what has widely been viewed as a partisan decision to remove the National Rally (RN) leader from the political stage, opting simply to defend the “independent” judiciary without commenting on the rights or wrongs of the ban itself.

An official present at a meeting with top government officials said Macron also stressed that “judges must be protected,” after it was revealed that the figure who barred Le Pen from running in France’s 2027 presidential election is now under police protection.

Already, RN President Jordan Bardella has come under fire for organising a rally in defence of Le Pen. He told reporters at the European Parliament that “it’s not a power play.”

On the contrary, it is a very clear and very deep defence of the rule of law and of French democracy.
Macron has so far been unable to issue a defence of democracy of his own since the ruling on Monday, beyond bland statements including “the law is the same for everyone” and “all defendants have the right to legal recourse.” This despite his own prime minister, Francois Bayrou, declaring that he was “troubled” by the court’s decision.

The Paris Court of Appeal will deliver its ruling on Le Pen’s appeal next year.



EXCLUSIVE: There Is Overwhelming Evidence That The Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Was Stolen, Says Roger Stone, “It’s A Matter Of Simple Math- The Numbers Just Don’t Add Up”
 
Nationalists start to begin to push-back against the globalist-satanists who declared Le Pen banned

 
Cong.-man gets info fm crazed liberal apparatchik, making excuses, lying as he keeps to his dumb logic regarding mis-handling & fraud regarding tax-payers' funds, etc.

 
Back
Top