Does something stink to high heaven in Georgia?

[Apollonian]

Something Stinks In Georgia​

The GOP primary numbers are funny because the votes were rigged​

Link: https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/something-stinks-in-georgia?s=r


Emerald Robinson
May 26

Let’s begin with a basic truth that most of the corporate media continually ignore or obscure: President Trump’s endorsement is the single most powerful force in the universe of American politics. There’s never been anything quite like it. Trump-endorsed candidates overwhelmingly prevailed in the latest GOP primaries by a margin of 24-4. In fact, President Trump is running the table on the GOP establishment in the 2022 races. His record stands at 92-7 at the moment.
Trump’s endorsement basically won the race for JD Vance in Ohio, and for Ted Budd in North Carolina. In Pennsylvania, his endorsement did the same thing for Doug Mastriano in the governor’s race. This has happened again and again in 2022. Remember, Trump’s record is 92-7.
That’s what makes the primary results in Georgia last night so curious and so suspect.
Georgia is the only state where President Trump’s endorsements did not count.


(Photo: VP Pence rallies for Brian Kemp and only 100 people show up — but Kemp wins the race with 72% of the vote?)
President Trump had endorsed quite a few candidates in Georgia, including David Perdue in the gubernatorial race with Brian Kemp, and Jody Hice in the race for Secretary of State against Brad Raffensperger. His endorsements were decisive in almost every political race in America this year. So why was Georgia such an outlier?
Sure, Georgia is an open primary state — Democrats are allowed to vote in the GOP primaries there — but that’s not the real story. Look at the RCP polling average: Brian Kemp was getting 52% of the votes and his main challenger, David Perdue, was getting 38% of the votes just before the race.
On Primary Day in Georgia, Kemp gets 74% and Perdue gets 22%. Nobody in any election in America gets 74% of the votes. Ever. It doesn’t happen.
Obvious fraud.

---

Brian Kemp’s funny numbers are not the only funny numbers in the Georgia primaries either. In the race for insurance commissioner, Trump-endorsed candidate Patrick Witt lost to a nobody named John King — and John King got 70% of the votes!
Now take a look at Patrick Witt’s numbers county by county: he got the same percentage of votes in 122 out of 159 counties in Georgia.
Let me repeat: the same percentage. Patrick Witt gets the same percentage in deep blue counties as he gets in deep red counties. Uniform numbers.
A month ago, the University of Georgia conducted a poll of Georgia’s Republican voters found very different results that directly contradict these funny numbers. In fact, the University of Georgia was predicting that Trump-endorsed candidates were going to win almost everything — which is happening in every other state in the country right now.
Allow me to quote at length:

It was in the down-ballot races where Trump’s endorsement made the most difference. State Sen. Burt Jones, R-Jackson, who is running for lieutenant governor with Trump’s endorsement against Senate President Pro Tempore Butch Miller, R-Gainesville, saw his support in the poll soar from 29.7% to 58.9% among voters told Trump was backing his candidacy. Miller’s support dropped slightly from 10.6% to 8.2% when voters were told he was not Trump’s pick.
The large contingent of undecided voters in the lieutenant governor’s race — 54.2% — fell significantly to 29.8% among voters who were told Trump was backing Jones.
Incumbent Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, who refused to go along with Trump’s attempts to overturn the presidential election results in Georgia in 2020, decided not to seek re-election.
U.S. Rep. Jody Hice, R-Greensboro, who Trump is backing for secretary of state against incumbent Brad Raffensperger, doubled his support in the poll — from 30.3% to 60.3% — when voters were told of the former president’s endorsement.
Conversely, support for Raffensperger dropped from 22.7% among voters who weren’t told of the endorsement, to 16.3%.
Trump’s endorsement even carried weight in a race that doesn’t directly involve anyone who has riled the former president. Little-known Patrick Witt, who is challenging incumbent Insurance Commissioner John King, saw his support skyrocket from just 8.3% when voters weren’t told Trump had endorsed Witt, to 51.8% among voters who were made aware of the endorsement.
King’s support slipped by a much smaller margin, from 10.6% to 7.2%. A third candidate in the race, Ben Cowart, also dropped from 9.6% to 4.5% when voters were told Trump had endorsed Witt.

So, to summarize, Trump’s endorsement is so powerful that Patrick Witt gets 52% of the vote, Jody Hice gets 60% of the vote, and Burt Jones gets 59% in a poll one month before the races.
On Primary Day in Georgia, none of this happened.
In fact, the candidates that were not endorsed by Trump went from single digits in the poll to commanding wins rarely seen in American politics. John King (who won with 70% remember!) was getting only 7% of the poll vote. Brad Raffensperger (who won!) got only 16% of the poll vote. Butch Miller (who might still win in a recount!) got only 8% of the poll vote.
Ask yourself: is that possible?
No, it’s not.

---

Meanwhile, the election integrity organization VOTER GA held a press conference on Monday to announce that 102 Georgia counties could not produce their drop box surveillance videos for the stolen 2020 election.
Let me repeat that number: 102 Georgia counties.
Apparently, 72 counties were forced to admit that all those videos had been destroyed.
Read the full press release for yourself.


Something stinks in Georgia.
The numbers are funny because many of these races were rigged.

 

[Apollonian]

Unplug Georgia, Unseal Ballots, Unleash Transparency​

Link: https://voterga.org/

Take a minute to contact your legislators for a Special Session to save Georgia elections

VoterGA tells Raffensperger to Unplug Georgia and Unseal Ballots
The Halderman Security Analysis explains why we must Unplug Georgia. See Studies tab

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 28, 2023.
Featured post

WHO SAYS THERE WAS NO 2020 ELECTION FRAUD?​

Click picture for national update
Lets Clean up American Elections – Our Top 30 proposed legislative priorities
WHAT WE FOUND IN GEORGIA
Six sworn affidavits of Fulton counterfeit ballots; (10s of thousands est.)
17,724 more votes than in person recount ballot images required to tabulate votes in Fulton
Drop box video surveillance representing 181,507 ballots destroyed in 102 counties
Improper Chain of Custody forms for 107,000 ballots statewide
Estimated Chain of Custody forms missing for 355,000 ballots statewide (Georgia Star)
86,860 voters in 2020 have false registration date prior to 2017 but were not on 2017 history file
Over 1.7 million original ballot images are lost or destroyed in 70 counties despite state, federal law
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on September 27, 2022.
Featured post

WHO SAYS THRE WAS NO GEORGIA ELECTION FRAUD?​

The Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee report concluded on December 9, 2020:
“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified”.
SYSTEMIC EVIDENCE OF FRAUD, ERRORS & IRREGULARITIES IN OUR 2020 ELECTION:

1. The U.S. District Court found on Oct 11th, 2020 the Dominion Voting System that was used in the November 2020 election is unverifiable to the voter and in violation of two Georgia statues
2. There are six sworn affidavits of counterfeit mail-in ballots in Fulton Co. election results scaling into the tens of thousands
3. State Farm Arena video shows at least four violations of Georgia election law
4. Approximately 43,000 DeKalb Co. drop box ballots have no chain of custody forms to authenticate them
5. Tru-Vote Geo tracking showed evidence of ballot harvesting teams driving repeatedly to drop boxes in Fulton and DeKalb
6. All 350,000+ original in-person ballot images in Fulton are missing in violation of federal, state retention law
7. All 393,000+ original ballot images in Cobb are missing in violation of federal, state retention law
8. At least 17,720 certified in person recount votes have no ballot images in Fulton
9. 18,325 voters had vacant residential addresses according to U.S. Post Office
10. 904 voters were registered at a P.O. Box address, which is illegal
11. All or large parts of 2,000,000 original ballot images from 70+ Georgia counties are missing
12. Failure to make mandatory check of ballot envelope signature to signature on file resulted in a 2020 absentee ballot rejection rate drop from 3.47% (in 2018) to 0.34%, which translates to the acceptance and inclusion of approximately 4,400 dubious Fulton County mail-in ballots
13. The U.S. District Court found Secretary of State’s office “not credible” on August 16th, 2019 [pg. 70]
14. A report compiled by Matt Braynard and his team at Look Ahead America provided specific, verifiable evidence that likely illegal ballots exceed the margin of victory in the Presidential race
15. Statistical abnormalities identified in many GA counties by former Army Intelligence Captain, Seth Keschel, show that it is implausible that the election results are correct.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
WHO HAS CONSTITUTIONAL & LEGAL AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE FRAUD?
Governor – GA Constitution Art. V, Sec. 2, Para. 2 – “The Governor shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed and shall be the conservator of the peace throughout the state’.”
Attorney General – O.C.G.A. § 45-15-17 – “(a) The Attorney General, as head of the Department of Law and as chief legal officer of the state, is authorized to institute and conduct investigations at any time into the affairs of the state; or of any department, board, bureau, commission, institution, authority, instrumentality, retirement system, or other agency of the state;”
Senate Ethics Committee – O.C.G.A. § 28-1-16 – “(a) If the Committee on Ethics of the Senate or House of Representatives determines that the effective functioning of the committee requires the issuance of compulsory process to secure the attendance of a witness or the production of documents and materials, or if a person whose conduct is called into question in an investigation or other proceeding requests the issuance of such compulsory process, the chairperson or acting chairperson shall make application in writing to the presiding judge of the Superior Court of Fulton County for the issuance of an appropriate subpoena.”
House Ethics Committee – O.C.G.A. § 28-1-16 – Same text as above for Senate Ethics Committee.
Secretary of State – O.C.G.A. § 45-13-20 = “(16) To perform all other duties which are required of him by law or which necessarily attach to his office.”
Dec. 2020 letter from Chairman Alan Powell to AG Chris Carr demanding an investigation into 2020 election irregularities
GA Legislative Counsel opinion that GA legislature has authority to investigate election for purposes of making legislative improvements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on October 26, 2021.
Featured post

WHAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA ELECTIONS?​

GEORGIA VOTING SYSTEM RESOLUTION
Unplug Georgia, Unseal Ballots, Unhide Processes

GEORGIA’S NEW DOMINION VOTING SYSTEM HAS BEEN FOUND BY THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT TO VIOLATE STATE LAW
Read Page 81 and 82 in Judge Totenberg’s 10-11-20 Order
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FINDS SECRETARY OF STATE’S OFFICE “NOT CREDIBLE”
Read Page 70 in Judge Totenberg’s 08-15-19 Order
WHAT’S WRONG WITH GEORGIA’S NEW VOTING SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES?
Did you know?

1. Georgia election results cannot ensure accuracy because the new (Ballot Marking Device System (BMD) voting system will tabulate votes hidden in bar codes the voter cannot read or verify.
2. Georgia counties are not required to audit State Senate, State House, County Commission, Judicial, Non-partisan or Municipal elections and have no plans to do so.
3. Recount accuracy cannot be confirmed because SEB procedures call for a recount to accumulate votes hidden in bar codes and ignore the vote selections that the voter verified.
4. Georgia is attempting to implement Risk Limiting Audits when the inventor of those procedures has already written Georgia officials to explain that the procedures cannot be used to meaningfully audit BMDs.
5. Counties cannot ensure the security of BMD ballots or election files received from the state and nearly all national cybersecurity experts flatly state BMDs are insecure and easily hacked.
6. Georgia has not stopped the high risk practice of having contractors build electronic ballots at home and transfer them through the public internet to an SOS server as explained in U.S. District court testimony.
7. The BMDs produce small paper summaries with only selected candidates and no referendum language despite scientific conclusions they are “unauditable” and “virtually useless for verifying voter intent”
8. Voter privacy cannot be maintained when the new BMD screens are so large and unprotected that voter selections can be seen from across the room 25 feet away.
9. Nothing has been done to mitigate security risks for dozens of unmitigated vulnerabilities in the SOS public server and the voter registration system as identified by Fortalice in U.S. District court testimony.
10. State election officials previously refused to investigate how 120,000 votes were lost in the 2018 Lt. Gov. race and refused to perform a forensic assessment when the state ballot builder server at KSU was found to have long been exposed to the internet in 2017.
11. Taxpayers incurred a 20 year bond to buy the new BMD system that vendors say only has a ten year shelf life.
12. State and counties paying $100 million more over 10 years than Hand Marked Paper Ballot and Ballot on Demand systems that experts contend more verifiable, auditable and secure.
13. Georgia implemented the same Dominion bar coded voting system that the state of Texas rejected and the state of Colorado announced they will ban as of this year.
14. The voting system failed to produce the correct results in all three recounts for the Coffee County 2020 election, forcing election officials to certify the hand count.
15. Georgia’s voting system picked the wrong winners in the May 24, 2022, DeKalb Co. District 2 Commission primary. It was the only race fully audited by a a hand count.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS NATIONALLY?
Lindell v. Dominion Lawsuit – May 2021
___________________________________________________________________________________________
GEORGIA ELECTION PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN RANKED AS THE WORST IN THE COUNTRY FOR CANDIDATE BALLOT ACCESS AS WELL AS VOTING SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND RECOUNT PREPAREDNESS – HERE’S MORE:
50 Reasons to Eliminate Georgia’s Unfair Candidate Petitioning Requirements

________________________________________________________________
SAFEST WAY TO VOTE: APPLY FOR MAIL-IN BALLOT EARLY
RETURN IT TO COUNTY ELECTION OFFICE ON ELECTION DAY
Vote from Home for Safety, Security, Privacy, and Verifiability

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on September 14, 2014.

Why VoterGA?​

Learn About VoterGA
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on June 30, 2022.

“BE THE CHANGE WITH VOTERGA”​

Aviva and the Flying Penguins “Change” from AvivaSingsOut on You Tube
A tribute to our local volunteers and nationwide donors.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on August 23, 2021.

ELECTION INTEGRITY BILL BLOCKED ON FINAL VOTE​

The good news in the recently completed General Assembly session is that we were successful at stopping Brad Raffensperger’s attempt to lift the ban on private money and eliminate non-partisan poll watching. The bad news is that Gov. Brian Kemp and Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan blocked the SB89 election integrity bill just before it became law.

SB89, an election integrity bill that made ballots public records came within minutes of passage on Sine Die but Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan refused to give it a vote even though it would have passed with unanimous Republican majority support. VoterGA established that Duncan acted on behalf of his friend Gov. Brian Kemp. Here is our letter to Lt. Gov. Duncan. See the latest press release on the Press Release tab or click the picture. Several Senators also voted with Duncan to prevent SB89 from getting a simple vote to accept the House changes. Read the story.

 

[Apollonian]

Georgia Grand Jury “Went Insane”, Targeted Lindsey Graham And 38 Others Over J6​

by ZeroHedge
September 8th 2023, 10:59 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/geor...argeted-lindsey-graham-and-38-others-over-j6/

The avalanche of indictment recommendations was revealed on Friday

The Georgia grand jury, whose ‘lunatic’ forewoman came under fire in February after she went on national TV, giddy with excitement, and foreshadowed the coming indictments against former President Donald Trump and 18 other defendants…

Emily khors is the forewoman of the Trump grand jury and she’s an absolute lunatic. She must think she’s the lead role in her head. pic.twitter.com/67DDzPmN83
— Stephan (@itoldyaso88) February 22, 2023

…went absolutely insane with indictment recommendations. As it turns out, the grand jury actually recommended charges against 39 people, including two former US senators for Georgia, David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, as well as current US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said called him after the 2020 election to ask if it was possible to invalidate mail-in ballots that violated the state’s signature-matching law, and whether political bias may have played a role in counties where poll workers accepted higher rates of mismatched signatures.

The avalanche of indictment recommendations was revealed on Friday after a Georgia judge released a report which underpinned GA District Attorney Fani Willis’ decision to issue indictments on racketeering charges.

“The Fulton County Grand Jury went insane,” writes journalist and attorney, Techno Fog of The Reactionary.

The Fulton County Grand Jury went insane –

Voting to indict Lindsey Graham, Michael Flynn, David Perdue, and Kelly Loeffler "with respect to the national effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election"

Perdue and Loeffler (and many others) would have faced RICO charges. pic.twitter.com/Zs9Cegn2VH
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 8, 2023

You know it’s bad when it’s too much for Fani.

 

[Apollonian]

Part 4: Nothing Adds Up in Fulton County… 17k Missing Ballot Images, 10 “Phantom” Tabulators That Account for 20k Votes, and More​

By Brian Lupo Sep. 13, 2023 10:00 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/part-4-nothing-adds-up-fulton-county-17k/?utm_source=rss/

[see vids at site link, above]

In Part 1, The Gateway Pundit revealed that the Georgia Secretary of State (GASOS) and the GASOS COO Gabriel Sterling, who left the SOS office to take a private contract with the SOS office and then returned to the SOS after the election, neglected to act on several requests to rectify a reported issue in Coffee County regarding their Dominion equipment before the Nov 3, 2020 election.
In Part 2, the mysterious ability of Dominion technicians to repair equipment without ever touching it was revealed through the sworn affidavit of now-indicted 30-year retired school teacher Cathy Latham.
In Part 3, we discussed a State Election Board complaint that resulted in Fulton County entering into a Consent Order that acknowledged “36 inconsistencies” in the Nov. 14th hand-recount/risk-limiting audit outlined in a report by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’s office. This report was based on research by Joe Rossi and David Cross showing numerous double and triple counted batches in the hand-count that helped the results get in line with the original machine count. The result was an excess 4,057 votes tallied for Joe Biden in the hand-count.

Part 4 – Where’s the Proof?​

During the 2020 Election in Fulton County, a “non-partisan” observer by the name of Carter Jones observed “nearly 270 hours” as part of a consent order with the county and the State Election Board. As reported by the GPB, Jones wrote of the Fulton County election:

“At no time did I ever observe any conduct by Fulton County election officials that involved dishonesty, fraud, or intentional malfeasance. During my weeks of monitoring, I witnessed neither ‘ballot stuffing’ nor ‘double-counting’ nor any other fraudulent conduct that would undermine the validity, fairness, and accuracy of the results published and certified by Fulton County.”

But this is not what Carter Jones reported on Election night. Jones reported on election night that “order was starting to break down” and Ralph (Jones) was double counting ballots at the State Farm Center!
New Deals Now Live At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Up to 80% Off!

After Part 3 of this series that documents the State Election Board (SEB) entering into a Consent Order with Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections (BRE) regarding 36 inconsistencies that add up to a 4,057 vote surplus for Joe Biden, it seems clear that “they made the numbers add up.” But, in all fairness, the hand-count wasn’t the “official count”. So how did the Election Day Machine Count (MC1), hand-recount and the Machine Recount (MC2) “add up” then?

Fulton County: Over 20,000 Votes of “Unknown Provenance” in Original Count​

Rossi and Moncla submitted a SEB Complaint 2023-025 on July 8th, 2022, in which they lay out two claims:

1. Irregularities in the Recount that lead to the addition of 16,382 votes
to the “Batches Loaded Report” (BLR) of December 3, 2020 to the
“certified result,” on December 4, which included 3,125 duplicate
ballots and 17,852 votes of unknown provenance – that is, for which
no physical ballot was in evidence.
2. Additional tabulator results from unreported and unidentifiable
tabulators that accounted for 20,713 votes in the November 3rd vote
totals.

In claim #2 above, based on evidence provided by officials they showed that the original count on November 3 was missing 20,713 ballot images and count-confirming tabulator tapes. Furthermore, this count of 20,713 ballots came from ten Advance Voting tabulators that have no record of existing. Open Records Requests were made for public documents explicitly regarding those ten tabulators, to which Fulton County responded they had “No such records.”
This means that there are no poll tapes. There are no daily status tapes. There are no poll closing tapes. They are not in the Logic and Accuracy testing logs. They do not appear in the equipment distribution logs nor the machine pick-up logs. They apparently don’t exist.
The following chart documents where each of the 20,713 votes were counted and on which specific “tabulator” according to the Cast Vote Record:

Moncla sought further confirmation and followed up with a request to the Fulton County Records Department and Fulton County Custodian of Records, Steve Rosenberg, to “confirm they don’t exist”. The Records Department replied, “This request has no additional responsive records. The records received in ORR R008635-120121 were complete.” The aforementioned email inquiries and responses were reviewed by The Gateway Pundit’s Brian Lupo. The tabulators documented in the chart above specifically were identified in the request.
Below are the relevant screenshots from responses regarding the non-existent tabulators:

So far, Carter Jones statements do not hold water. The hand-count was off by a significant amount. The 4,057 vote surplus for Biden was a difference of 34% of the margin of victory in just one county that accounts for only 10% of Georgia’s electorate. MC1 was not any better. In fact, it was significantly worse: 20,713 votes that have no record and were recorded on machines that don’t seem to exist at all.

Machine Count 2 (MC2): 17,234 Less Than the Election Night Count (MC1)​

The second machine count began on November 24th, 2020 and had a deadline for completion of midnight on December 2, 2020. Fulton County submitted results that showed 511,543 votes tabulated. This is contradictory to MC1 which showed 528,777 were originally tabulated, or a difference of 17,234 votes less in the second machine count, MC2.
However, by December 4th, Fulton County “found” 16,382 votes. Remember from Carter Jones: “It’s not what it looks like during the election. It’s what happens after the election and what it looks like at the end. Fulton was able to make their numbers zero out…”
Trending: Newly Emerged 9/11 Video Shows Previously Unseen Angle of Second Plane Hitting South Tower – Uploader Claims to “Accidentally Left It Private” on YouTube for Almost 2 Decades (VIDEO)
But where did those 16,382 votes come from? Through an Open Records Request on an unrelated topic, Moncla stumbled upon an email dated December 3, 2020 from Fulton County Elections Director Rick Barron to Ryan Macias of the Elections Group. Macias was formerly the acting Director of the EAC’s testing and certification and is a “Subject Matter Expert” for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Included in that email obtained through Open Records Request was a PDF file titled “Batches Loaded Report.xml”. The report showed 511,543 votes “tabulated and published.” According to the complaint (full complaint attached at bottom):

To ensure the report was not outdated or irrelevant, we opened the file in its native format
(.XML) using a web browser which revealed relevant timestamps for both the email and the
attached report:

As can be seen in the image above, the document itself contains the timestamp of the Batches
Loaded Report (BLR) “2020 12-03T 17:06:29Z”, or December 3rd 2020 at 17:06:29 Zulu Time. (Note: Zulu time is 5 hours behind Eastern Standard Time)

This shows that the “Batches Loaded Report” attached to the email was made 6 minutes before the email was sent. The email itself was sent 12 hours after the “deadline” to submit MC2 results.
Fulton County made the following tweet on Dec 3 at 12:52am, 12 hours before the email between Barron and Macias:


During a December 4th meeting to certify the vote, Barron told Fulton County BRE that a scanner had two sets of 62 batches with the same identification, which led to the failure to count one of those batches. It was resolved by scanning those batches on a separate scanner. The following is queued up to the relevant statement from that meeting (29:57-30:30):


From Barron’s statement above, he claims:

“There are “only two ways you can do it (resolve the issue). Either you have have to append those batches at the end or you can scan them on different scanners. So we used the different scanners rather than appending them on the end.”

While Barron said he chose to rescan those 62 batches instead of append them, there were still 49 batches were appended, instead, to the end of the end of the count on the evening of Dec 3, 2020:

In the clip below (59:12 – 1:00:34), Fulton County Board member Mark Wingate questions the inconsistencies in all three counts and concludes with Barron “coming up with some reconciliation because if [he] wouldn’t have done that [he] would have been, what, some 3 or 4 thousand votes even less?”:

After the Thursday afternoon email from Barron to Macias, who was neither a Fulton Co employee, a Happy Faces employee, a Fulton County contractor nor a Fulton County vendor, 16,198 voters were added to the count. Macias was working in Fulton County on behalf of The Elections Group, which was being funded by the Center for Tech and Civic Life (Zuckerbucks).

Expert Witness Finds Similar Discrepancies in Federal Lawsuit​

Expert witness Philip Stark submitted a Declaration in a pending federal lawsuit stating that Fulton County records are missing 17,852 ballot images from the official recount results. Fulton County admitted in a Requests for Admissions that they did not preserve “a majority of ballot images” from Nov 3. 2020.

Summary: Fani Willis is Investigating the Wrong Person(s)​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis does not seem interested with investigating these anomalies, but rather is focused on prosecuting the leading candidate opposing her political party.

• 10 tabulators that have no record of existing but are attributed to over 20,000 votes
• 17,852 missing ballot images in the second machine count
• 376,863 missing image files from the first machine count
• an email sent after Fulton announced the recount was complete that showed 16,382 votes added to the Batches Loaded Report after Fulton Election Director Richard Barron consulted via email with The Elections Group’s Ryan Macias

SEB Complaint has been in front of the State Election Board for over a year, despite the Complaint’s drafters being responsible for the Complaint that led to a report from Governor Kemp, and, eventually, a Consent Order between Fulton County BRE and the SEB.
Until SEB Complaint 2023-025 and election expert Philip Stark’s declaration in Curling v. Raffensperger is addressed, there is no other way to describe DA Willis’s prosecution as a weaponization of her office to attack a political rival.

Hopefully the cameras work in the courtroom.
Part 5 to follow.

582622243 Moncla and Rossi … by kmoncla

 

[Apollonian]

Nigga DA broke law, swore oath falsely

 

[Apollonian]

Election Group Slapped With RICO Says It Can Prove Trump Won Georgia In 2020​

BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, NOV 04, 2023 - 06:15 PM
Authored by Samantha Flom via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/political...ico-says-it-can-prove-trump-won-georgia-2020/

Former Black Voices for Trump leader Harrison Floyd’s legal team intends to prove his innocence of claims he unlawfully participated in an election subversion plot in Fulton County, Georgia, by showing that former President Donald Trump won the state’s 2020 presidential election.
Harrison Floyd, as seen in an undated mugshot, is the only one of the 19 Fulton County defendants to be held in jail without bond. (Fulton County Sheriff's Department)
Mr. Floyd was charged on Aug. 14 alongside the 45th president and 17 other co-defendants with violating Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings, and influencing witnesses.
He was the only defendant to spend time in jail due to the indictment before he was released on bond on Aug. 30.
“Your Honor, this case isn’t about whether you or I think that Donald Trump lost the election. It’s about what Mr. Floyd believed at the time,” noted Chris Kachouroff, one of Mr. Floyd’s defense attorneys, at a Nov. 3 hearing before Judge Scott McAfee.
“It’s also [about] what the false statements are alleged to have been, and indeed, are they really false,” he said.

Opening the Door​

The judge ordered the hearing in response to motions to quash three sweeping subpoenas Mr. Floyd’s legal team served to the office of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the Fulton County Clerk of Courts, and the Fulton County Board of Elections.
Materials the attorneys requested included the ballot images and envelopes for all absentee ballots cast in the 2020 general election, all absentee ballot application forms, reports from the Dominion voting machines used, and all laptops and poll pads used by election workers, along with other documents, files, and drives.
Attorneys also requested all documents and recordings concerning the secretary of state’s post-election investigation into allegations of election fraud.
“The state chose to open this door,” Mr. Kachouroff said. “It is a broad and sweeping complaint. They opened the door wide open for us to walk in and ask for these things.”
The attorney noted that the 98-page indictment repeatedly asserts as fact that President Trump lost the 2020 election in Georgia, and the charges against Mr. Floyd are predicated on that claim. But if Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is wrong and President Trump actually won the election, then Mr. Floyd cannot be guilty of soliciting “false statements and writings” that conveyed as much.
The indictment also maintains that Mr. Floyd and the other co-defendants were aware that President Trump lost the election and that their actions constituted an unlawful conspiracy to change the results in his favor.
That assertion, Mr. Kachouroff said, would also be undermined by proof that the former president won or even just proof that the election’s outcome is uncertain. And the subpoenaed materials, he argued, are likely to contain that proof.
“We could make that argument that he’s innocent no matter what happened,” he noted. “And, of course, we would. We’re defense attorneys; that’s what we do.
“But at the end of the day, those are the possible options down the road that could arise. Right now, we believe we’re at Option 1, that President Trump indeed won the election, and we can prove it—with respect to Fulton County.”

Pushback​

Mr. Raffensperger’s office, represented by Attorney Jackson Sharmon III, has argued that the broad scope of materials requested by the defense would place an “undue burden” on an entity that is not even a party in the case.
Contesting the subpoena before the judge, Mr. Sharmon said the requested documents contain “little, if anything,” relevant to Mr. Floyd’s defense.
“If the purpose is state of mind, his intent, the documents we would produce—which he didn’t know about, he didn’t have—are not going to have any effect on the determination of his intent at the time he allegedly undertook the acts that are in the indictment.”
Mr. Sharmon also challenged the defense’s argument that proving President Trump won the election would necessarily erase the possibility that Mr. Floyd had criminal intent.
“With all due respect, I don’t think that’s the case,” he said. “That’s not the way intent, in a criminal case, is adjudicated.”
Meanwhile, attorneys for Fulton County said it could take months to produce the requested materials. And in terms of relevance, they pointed to Mr. Kachouroff’s admission that he could argue his client’s innocence even without the requested materials as evidence they weren’t needed.
But for Mr. Kachouroff, the state’s arguments didn’t negate his client’s right to those materials.
“Harrison Floyd is looking at between eight and 33 years. That’s his liberty interest. Courts take liberty interest very seriously so that liberty interest overcomes any burden the state has to be set back by a month or two or three.”
By the end of the hearing, the three subpoenas were reduced to two as it was revealed that the Board of Elections did not possess any of the requested materials, which are held by the Clerk of Courts.
The judge, expressing concern over the potential disclosure of voters’ personally identifiable information, said more information was needed to determine what exactly was being requested, the extent of the state’s burden in producing it, and whether a protective order was needed.

MORE POLITICAL STORIES ON ZEROHEDGE​

Florida "Booty Patrol" Driver Busted, Cops Mocked​

Kamala Harris' Stepdaughter Helps Raise $8M For Gaza While Mom's Admin Pushing Billions For Israel​

Appeals Court Freezes Trump Gag Order Issued By Out-Of-Control Woke Judge​

​

 

[Apollonian]

Déjà Vu: Another Software Issue Blamed in Georgia’s Elections – Same Symptoms as 2020 and 2022 Elections​

By Brian Lupo Nov. 9, 2023 7:20 pm

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ue-blamed-georgias-elections/?utm_source=rss/

Georgia’s elections are riddled with issues. Since the implementation of the new voting system in the Peach State, multiple counties have “discovered” extra votes in the 2020 Presidential Election during their mid-November 2020 hand recount. This included 2,600 votes “discovered” in Floyd County, more than 2,700 votes in Fayette County, 284 in Walton, and 293 in Douglas County. Investigative journalist Heather Mullins was on the ground in Floyd County and interviewed Elections officials about the discrepancy as it was happening:

And it continued beyond the 2020 election: in the 2022 Primary Election in Dekalb County, a county commissioner candidate moved from third place to first place after a hand-count, which also, surprisingly, turned up an additional 2,810 ballots from the original machine count.

7 Reasons to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Premium Beef Right Away
As reported by The Gateway Pundit, Williamson County, TN, during a 2022-report from the federal Elections Assistance Commission, it was revealed that their Dominion ballot marking devices and tabulators had “erroneous code” found on the system that would randomly flag a ballot as “provisional”, therefore not counting it, and divert it to a provisional folder. The ballots tabulated immediately after would also be diverted to another folder. It was discovered that the system log files for those machines had a “QR Code signature mismatch” warning. Coincidentally, 97% of Georgia counties examined by David Cross and Kevin Moncla of the Election Oversight Group had the same exact code in their system log files.

The anomaly acknowledged in Williamson has not been acknowledged in Georgia, however, the symptoms existed in the 2020 and 2022 elections, as referenced above.
Now, there is evidence that it occurred in at least one jurisdiction in Georgia in the recent 2023 election.
The Valdosta Daily Times reports:

Election officials are blaming a vote-counting discrepancy on state-mandated software that failed to completely load votes from Precinct 10, which votes at the Lowndes County Civic Center.
Officials re-uploaded those ballots and the issue seemed to be resolved around 9:30 p.m.
The second upload did change a few of the totals for Valdosta races, but they did not alter the outcome of any race.
According to numbers released about 8:30 p.m. Tuesday, candidates for Valdosta mayor and the at-large Valdosta City Council post received more votes than the total number of ballots cast. Officials reported 4,492 ballots had been cast — but said they believed that number was wrong. The three candidates for Valdosta mayor totaled 4,905 votes while the at-large city council seat’s four candidates totaled 4,713.
About 8:45 p.m., officials updated the turnout numbers to show 5,450 ballots had been cast.
After officials re-uploaded the Precinct 10 ballots, the total of ballots cast was recorded as 5,758.

Three consecutive elections with large quantities of ballots being “discovered” after preliminary counts. In Floyd County, the 2600 accounted for a 6.3% increase to the 38,500 votes initially reported. President Trump “lost” Georgia by 00.25%.
In Dekalb County’s 2022 Primary, the 2,810 ballots accounted for an 18.1% increase to the 12,600 votes initial count. And now, in Valdosta, there is a 22% discrepancy between the 4,492 ballots initially reported and the 5,758 ultimately reported.
Prophetically, persecuted attorney John Eastman claimed that this is what happened in the January 5th, 2021 run-off election, referring to votes being placed in a “secret folder in the machines.” This statement from Eastman was made almost a year before the issue was discovered in Williamson County, TN in October 2021 and, subsequently, in Georgia’s voting machines. The issue wasn’t reported to the public by the EAC until March 2022.

Not only has Georgia seemingly failed to address the “QR Code Signature Mismatch” warnings in their system and its apparent ties to the Williamson County “erroneous code” issue, but in response to the damning J Alex Halderman report released earlier this year, Secretary of State Raffensperger won’t be updating the State’s voting systems until after the 2024 election cycle:

 

[Apollonian]

Federal Judge Orders Trial for Ga.'s Dominion Voting Machines​

Link: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/voting-machines-georgia-lawsuit/2023/11/12/id/1141994/

(Dreamstime)

Sunday, 12 November 2023 03:44 PM EST

The question of whether Georgia's electronic voting system has major cybersecurity flaws that amount to a violation of voters' constitutional rights to cast their votes and have those votes accurately counted is set to be decided at trial early next year.
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg issued a 135-page ruling late Friday in a long-running lawsuit filed by activists who want the state to ditch its electronic voting machines in favor of hand-marked paper ballots. The state had asked the judge to rule in its favor based on the arguments and facts in the case without going to trial, but Totenberg found there are "material facts in dispute" that must be decided at trial.
She set a Jan. 9 bench trial, which means there will be no jury. But she also suggested that the two sides work together to reach a resolution.
"The Court cannot wave a magic wand in this case to address the varied challenges to our democracy and election system in recent years, including those presented in this case," she wrote. "But reasonable, timely discussion and compromise in this case, coupled with prompt, informed legislative action, might certainly make a difference that benefits the parties and the public."
The lawsuit was filed by several individual voters and the Coalition for Good Governance, which advocates for election security and integrity, against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and members of the State Election Board. It claims that the current configuration of the state's election system presents a threat to voters' right to have their votes counted as cast.
It spawned an expert report that identified vulnerabilities in the election system used in Georgia that led a federal cybersecurity agency to issue an advisory to jurisdictions that use the equipment and has prompted some Georgia Republicans to call for abandoning the machines. It also led to the exposure of a breach of election equipment in a rural south Georgia county, which has resulted in criminal charges for several people as part of the sprawling Fulton County indictment against former President Donald Trump and 18 others.
Since the lawsuit was first filed in 2017, Georgia has emerged as a pivotal swing state, putting a national spotlight on its elections. The electronic voting system the state uses, which was purchased from Dominion Voting Systems in 2019 and implemented statewide in 2020, has been the subject of outlandish conspiracy theories.
Dominion has been a particular target of Trump supporters, who claimed that the machines were used to help steal the election from him. The election equipment manufacturer has aggressively responded with litigation, notably reaching a $787 million settlement with Fox News in April.
Totenberg made clear in a footnote in her order that the evidence in the Georgia case "does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation's leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs' case in the long course of this litigation."
The lawsuit long predates the swirl of controversy that followed the 2020 election. When it was initially filed in 2017, it targeted the paperless touchscreen voting machines that Georgia had been using for 15 years. It was then amended to challenge the election system the state bought in 2019, with claims that the new system has similar vulnerabilities.
The touchscreen voting machines used by virtually every in-person voter in Georgia print a paper ballot with a human-readable summary and a QR code, a type of barcode, that is read by a scanner to count the votes.
Among other concerns about the election system, the activists say voters can't be sure that the barcode read by the scanner accurately reflects their selections. Many voters also don't take the time to check the human-readable part, making meaningful audits impossible, they say.
University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman, an expert witness for the plaintiffs, examined Dominion voting machines and identified vulnerabilities that he said could be exploited by bad actors. He has said the risks presented by those vulnerabilities were exacerbated when a computer forensics team hired by Trump allies copied data and software from election equipment in rural Coffee County in January 2021 and distributed it to an unknown number of people.
The state has said it will not install a software update meant to address those vulnerabilities ahead of the 2024 election, saying it would be impractical to update all of the equipment by then. Gabriel Sterling, chief operating officer in the Secretary of State's office, earlier this month dismissed Halderman's findings as "hypothetical scenarios that can't work."
Lawyers for the election officials have consistently argued that no election system is without vulnerabilities and that the state takes countless measures to protect the integrity of its system.
Totenberg stressed in her order that at this stage in the process, where she was considering the state's motion for summary judgment, she was required to look at the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs. At the upcoming trial, the plaintiffs have "a heavy burden to establish a constitutional violation" connected to the voting system, she wrote.
Even if she ultimately rules in their favor, she wrote, she can't order the state to implement a paper ballot system. She said there are "pragmatic, sound remedial policy measures" that she could order or that the parties could agree upon, including: eliminating QR codes on ballots and having scanners read human-legible text; using a broader scope and number of election audits; and implementing essential cybersecurity measures and policies recommended by leading experts.
"We look forward to presenting our full evidence at trial and obtaining critical relief for Georgia voters," said David Cross, an attorney for some of the individual voters. "But we hope this decision will be a much-needed wakeup call for the Secretary and SEB, and finally spur them to work with us on a negotiated resolution that secures the right to vote in Georgia."
Both Cross and Coalition for Good Governance executive director Marilyn Marks said Raffensperger has continually failed to address escalating risks to the state's voting system.
"The Court's Order makes it clear that the status quo is far too risky, and that these concerning issues merit a trial," Marks said.
A representative for Raffensperger did not immediately respond to an email Saturday seeking comment.

 

[Apollonian]

Big mystery now in Ga.--shysters defending Demon-rats who stole election now want to withdraw fm case--WHY?--speculation has it that their clients/defendants DESTROYED EVIDENCE (automatic admission of guilt)

 

[Apollonian]

THIS IS BIG: Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Refuses to Testify Under Oath About Secretary of State’s Dominion Voting Machines​

By Jim Hoft Dec. 27, 2023 8:00 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/this-is-big-georgia-secretary-state-brad-raffensperger/

As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier this year – the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia unsealed the 96-page Halderman Report in June 2023- the Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was hiding this report from the public for two years.
University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Halderman and Security Researcher and Assistant Professor at Auburn University Drew Sringall collaborated on the report where they discovered many exploitable vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCast X system.

Far-left Georgia Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation on Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report for two years until its release last summer.
The report confirms that votes can be altered in the Dominion voting machines. In fact, the report reveals that the Dominion software is vulnerable and can be hacked.
Christian Precious Metals Company Embraces Integrity to Protect Americans’ Retirement
Trump-hating Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger hid this information from the public until June 2023.
Here is a copy of the Halderman Report released in June.

Halderman Report on Georgi… by Jim Hoft
Professor Halderman wrote about his findings in a blog post after the report’s release.

Back in September 2020, the Court granted the Curling Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security. Drew and I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers. The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction. This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.
Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place. While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections, without more precautions and mitigations, there is a serious risk that they will be exploited in the future.

Professor Halderman also tweeted out that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger will not install Dominion’s security patches before the 2024 election.

“The known breaches in Georgia would be sufficient to uncover and exploit every vulnerability we found—and likely others we missed. Yet MITRE’s risk assessment assumes that Georgia perfectly protects the equipment from illicit access across all of its 159 counties.
“Astonishingly, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who has been aware of our findings for two years, just announced that the state will not get around to installing Dominion’s security patches until after the 2024 Presidential election.”

This was taken from a recent Raffensperger statement:

The office also announced that there will be pilots of the recently Election Assistance Commission-certified version of Democracy Suite, 5.17, in 2023. This software has not been deployed in any election in any jurisdiction as of yet.
The pilots will examine its full functionality in a real-world setting. Also, in reviewing the processes it will require an update of the nearly 45,000 pieces of voting equipment, along with the subsequent acceptance testing. This process will take tens of thousands of manhours. Therefore, the statewide move to 5.17 will occur following the 2024 election cycle. This will allow the state and counties to focus on executing municipal elections and running the Presidential cycle. It also allows the state to put together a thoughtful, thorough plan to roll out the latest software.

Raffensperger, a vocal Never-Trumper, has been aware of the investigators’ findings for two years!
That means Raffensperger, as Georgia’s Secretary of State, ran the vulnerable machines during his reelection in 2022!
What is up with Brad Raffensperger?
Now, Secretary Raffensperger refuses to testify before the court in January regarding the state’s voting machines.

The James Magazine Online reported:

Last month U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg ruled that a lawsuit against Georgia’s use of electronic voting machines must go to a non-jury trial in January. She ordered Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to defend the state’s utilization of electronic voting prior to the upcoming presidential primary election because the lawsuit questions whether Georgia’s current system of computerized voting is safe or whether it is vulnerable to potential hacking.
However, the state (spending taxpayer money) is now appealing to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to keep Raffensperger from testifying.
Says one lawyer to James Magazine Online familiar with the case: “Raffensperger selected the system, repeatedly defends the system as secure, but now can’t take an hour or so in federal court to defend it.”

UPDATE: The 11th Circuit Court will meet on Friday to decide if Raffensperger should testify.

 

[Apollonian]

Here's report on the fake state (of Georgia) RICO charges against Trump and others

 

[Apollonian]

Lots more evidence will come out on things, no doubt, as nigga DA must now testify