Creepy Joe DOJ CONTINUES to stone-wall Congress for info, suckers--refuses to name the higher-ups who decided not to charge dear Hunter

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

US Attorney Refuses to Reveal Names of “Five or Six” People Involved in Decision Not to Prosecute Hunter Biden​

By Cristina Laila Oct. 10, 2023 11:30 am

Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...reveal-names-five-six-people/?utm_source=rss/

IMG_4277-1.jpg

Matthew Graves, a Biden-appointed US Attorney for DC and the January 6 lead prosecutor, refused to reveal the names of those involved in a decision to not bring charges against Hunter Biden.
Graves told lawmakers he is “already dealing with enough threats and harassment” in the transcript obtained by Just the News.
He told lawmakers how his office did not partner with US Attorney from Delaware Dave Weiss. Weiss was eventually given special counsel status and charged Hunter Biden with federal crimes related to a gun purchase.

According to the transcript, Graves met with “five or six” people from his office in March 2022 to determine whether Hunter should be charged with tax crimes. Three weeks later Graves’ office decided not to be involved in Hunter Biden’s case, Just the News reported.
8 Critical, Life-Saving Medications Every American Should Have On Hand (And The Foolproof Way To Get Them Prescribed)
Matthew Graves also told lawmakers he never felt he needed to recuse himself from Hunter’s case even though he was a part of Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
Excerpt from Just the News:
Matthew Graves, the U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. who was a key figure in Jan. 6 prosecutions and refused to bring tax charges against Hunter Biden, backed out of naming those involved in declining to prosecute the first son, according to his transcribed interview with lawmakers.
Graves told lawmakers he met with five or six people from his office in March 2022 to determine whether they should get involved in the Hunter Biden case.
Three weeks later the office decided to not get involved in the case, and Graves refused to disclose his office’s thoughts because the investigation is still ongoing.
Graves also said it was “normal” for federal prosecutors to bring tax cases without partnering with the Justice Department Tax Division, but in this case, Weiss needed the division’s approval to open a grand jury probe into Hunter Biden.
While Graves said he never told the Delaware prosecutor to not bring charges, he also never followed up with Weiss to make it clear that he was still welcome to bring charges even if his own office would not be involved.
Hunter Biden was indicted on federal gun charges last month.
Biden was indicted in a Delaware court on three counts related to his possession of a firearm while using drugs.
Special Counsel Dave Weiss indicted Hunter Biden after the sweetheart plea deal fell apart August.
Last month’s gun-related charges aren’t the end of Hunter Biden’s legal problems. Weiss previously withdrew Hunter’s tax-related charges in Delaware and said the venue for the offenses are either in California or DC.
Prosecutors say the venue for Hunter Biden’s tax-related charges lies either in California or DC, not Delaware.
“Venue for these offenses does not lie in Delaware. Rather, venue for these offenses and any other related tax offenses lies either in the Central District of California or in the District of Columbia. The information was filed in this District because the parties had previously agreed that the Defendant would waive any challenge to venue and plead guilty in this District. However, during the July 26, 2023, hearing that the Court set on this matter, the Defendant pled not guilty. Since that time, the parties have engaged in further plea negotiations but are at an impasse. The Government now believes that the case will not resolve short of a trial,” the filing said.
Biden-appointed US Attorneys were in charge of determining whether Hunter Biden was charged with crimes. An obvious conflict of interest that is largely ignored by the mainstream media.
 
Only now and lately does corrupt creepy Joe DOJ, headed by corrupt kike AG, Garland, begin to "investigating" dear son, Hunter, as un-registered foreign agent

 

Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney ADMITS he declined to prosecute Hunter for tax crimes and says it was because he was too 'short-staffed' and didn't have enough lawyers to pursue the case​

Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rosecute-Hunter-tax-crimes-short-staffed.html
By KELLY LACO, EXECUTIVE EDITOR OF POLITICS FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 17:27 EDT, 26 October 2023 | UPDATED: 08:54 EDT, 27 October 2023

A top Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney has confirmed he declined to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimes, bizarrely claiming he was 'resource-strapped' and didn't have enough lawyers to handle the case.
DailyMail.com reviewed the transcript of a closed-door House Judiciary Committee interview with Martin Estrada, the U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, which was conducted on Tuesday.
Estrada detailed a phone call he had in October 2022 with David Weiss, the U.S. Attorney in Delaware, who is leading the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden's alleged gun and tax offences.
During the call Weiss asked Estrada to partner with him on the Hunter Biden case - but he declined.
When asked by congressional investigators why he did not pursue charges against the president's son, Estrada said that he was short-staffed.
He said: 'I was down 40 AUSAs (Assistant U.S. Attorneys) at the time, so we were very resource-strapped.
'We were trying to hire as much as possible and had very limited resources. And every attorney you assign to a case means you can't do another case.'
Estrada added: 'And it seemed he (Weiss) didn't push back when I told him the situation, that we wouldn't be co-counseling, but he did express appreciation when I offered administrative support.'
Martin Estrada is an American lawyer who serves as the United States Attorney for the Central District of California since September 2022


Martin Estrada is an American lawyer who serves as the United States Attorney for the Central District of California since September 2022
The House Judiciary Committee is run by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio


The House Judiciary Committee is run by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio
TRENDING

Who is Mike Johnson? GOP House Speaker winner from Louisiana


Newly-elected Speaker Mike Johnson defends homophobic comments


Mike Johnson claimed gay marriage would lead to people marrying pets

Estrada's interview came after two IRS whistleblowers - Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler - testified under oath that Hunter Biden received 'special' treatment in the investigation into his financial dealings.
According to a transcript of the interview Estrada said that, although he declined to jointly prosecute the case, he felt it was 'immaterial' to whether Weiss ended up bringing charges.
Estrada also maintained he 'never' took any steps to block Weiss from pursuing charges against Hunter Biden in California.
In August, Weiss was appointed special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland after the IRS whistleblowers came forward. That increased his powers to pursue the case.
Last month, Weiss charged Hunter Biden with three felony counts related to lying on a federal gun application form while under the influence of drugs.
He pleaded not guilty and faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted.
The not guilty plea comes after Hunter Biden previously agreed a plead deal that would have seen him avoid jail time.
That deal collapsed in the summer after what Republicans criticized it as a 'sweetheart' deal.
Republicans including House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan have pointed out discrepancies between Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel Weiss' public statements on the Hunter Biden case, about who had 'full authority' to charge the president's son.
Estrada told investigators he did not agree with the characterization that Weiss had 'ultimate authority' to bring charges in any district - before he was appointed special counsel.
'I thought [Weiss] had authority to bring the charges wherever he chose to when he was U.S. Attorney and certainly as he is now special counsel,' Estrada said.
But when further pressed about the exact definition of 'ultimate authority' he backtracked and called the phrase 'vague.'
Estrada also said that only the Attorney General holds the 'ultimate authority' for the entire Department of Justice.
U.S. Attorney Weiss will be questioned in Congress behind closed doors on November 7


U.S. Attorney Weiss will be questioned in Congress behind closed doors on November 7
Hunter Biden was in court in September to plead not guilty to three felony counts related to lying on a federal gun application form while under the influence of drugs


Hunter Biden was in court in September to plead not guilty to three felony counts related to lying on a federal gun application form while under the influence of drugs
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan will question Weiss behind closed doors in November


House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan will question Weiss behind closed doors in November
Weiss previously sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee attempting to clarify his role in the probe and insisted that he does hold the 'ultimate authority' in the criminal gun and tax case against the president's son.
He explained that as the U.S. attorney for Delaware, his charging authority is normally 'geographically limited' to that district - but said that Attorney General Merrick Garland had promised to grant him special attorney status to bring charges anywhere.
However, Garland said that Weiss was free 'to make a decision to prosecute any way in which he wanted to and in any district in which he wanted to.'
The DOJ attempted to clear up the discrepancies in a letter to the committee chairman Jim Jordan.
It said: 'While testimony at this early juncture must be appropriately limited to protect the ongoing matter and important confidentiality interests, the Department acknowledges your stated interest in addressing aspects of this matter in the near term, such as U.S. Attorney Weiss’s authority and jurisdiction to bring charges wherever he deems appropriate.'
DailyMail.com has also confirmed that Weiss will be questioned in Congress behind closed doors on November 7.
 

Hunter Biden got $250k loan from Chinese exec during 2020 election, later his lawyer assumed debt​

One of Hunter Biden's lawyers, Kevin Morris, assumed the obligations for a $250,000 loan when he acquired the younger Biden's stake in Bohai Harvest RST.

By Steven Richards and John Solomon
Published: October 29, 2023 11:12pm
Updated: October 30, 2023 12:49pm

Link: https://justthenews.com/accountabil...dens-chinese-partner-was-loan-assumed-lawyer/

Hunter Biden received a $250,000 loan from a Chinese businessman just three months after his father launched his 2020 presidential campaign, and he later transferred the debt to a Hollywood lawyer he befriended, according to evidence gathered by federal and congressional investigators.
The House Oversight Committee first disclosed a few weeks ago that Hunter Biden had gotten a $250,000 wire in July 2019 and used his father’s address in Delaware for the transfer. It was one of the later known foreign payments that Hunter Biden received before he fell on hard times.
Documents gathered by federal law enforcement and reviewed by Just the News show Hunter Biden considered the wire to be a July 25, 2019 "loan" from Xiangsheng “Jonathan” Li, a Chinese businessman whom he had been doing business with for over a decade when they created an investment fund under the name Bohai Harvest RST (BHR).
After Joe Biden became president, the records show, Hunter Biden transferred the debt to Kevin Morris, a Hollywood lawyer whom he befriended after they met at a November 2019 Joe Biden campaign fundraiser in Los Angeles.
The debt was "assumed" by Morris on Nov. 17, 2021 when the lawyer acquired Hunter Biden's stake in the BHR partnership and a separate company called Skaneateles, LLC, according to one record reviewed by Just the News. Hunter Biden "is no longer the primary obligor" as a result of the transaction with Morris, that memo stated.
Morris' assumption of the debt obligation is only part of millions of dollars in assistance the lawyer, a Democrat donor, has given Hunter Biden since the two met.
The relationship is now under investigation by Congress. Most of Morris' assistance is in the form of loans, according to a source close to Hunter Biden. Morris has also been a member of Hunter Biden's legal team from time to time.
“It sure seems that the Bidens get a lot of loans that raise many questions," House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer told Just the News. "Hunter Biden’s defense team was quick to say that the $250,000 wire he received from a Chinese national that listed Joe Biden’s home as the beneficiary address was a loan.
"However, Hunter Biden’s defense team fails to mention that Kevin Morris quietly assumed that loan for Hunter Biden,” Comer added. “Why is Kevin Morris, who is a lawyer and Democrat donor, taking on Hunter Biden’s China debt? This raises serious ethical questions that the White House must answer."
Morris and Hunter Biden's lawyer, Abbe Lowell, did not respond to requests for comment from Just the News.
Li is a Chinese businessman who controlled a firm called Bohai Capital and partnered with Hunter Biden and Devon Archer in 2012 to form Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was controlled and primarily funded by Chinese state-owned entities, including the Bank of China, according to a Senate report released in 2020. Hunter Biden served on BHR’s board of directors and held a 10% stake in the company from 2017 onward, reportedly receiving no other compensation for his work, according to the report.
The Senate report also said that "Hunter Biden and Devon Archer engaged in numerous financial transactions with Chinese nationals who had deep connections to the Communist Chinese government."
In December 2013, Hunter Biden traveled to Beijing aboard Air Force Two with then-Vice President Joe Biden. The trip came shortly after Li, Archer, and Biden had signed a memorandum of understanding to form BHR. Hunter Biden later acknowledged that he introduced his father to Jonathan Li in the lobby of their Beijing hotel. Twelve days after the trip, BHR was registered in Beijing, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The loan to Hunter Biden came exactly three months after his father announced his presidential candidacy on April 25, 2019. During the campaign, and to this day, Joe Biden flatly denies that his son was making money from China or that he had any knowledge of those business dealings. In one instance, in the October 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden claimed that his son “has not made money…in China,” despite emerging evidence to the contrary.
Earlier that month, Hunter Biden’s lawyer at the time, George Mesires, addressed Hunter’s role with the company. “Hunter neither played a role in the formation or licensure of the company, nor owned any equity in it while his father was Vice President,” he wrote in a post to Medium. “He served only as a member of its board of directors, which he joined based on his interest in seeking ways to bring Chinese capital to international markets. It was an unpaid position.”
However, Hunter Biden’s own records and emails, show he played a role in forming the company with his partner, Devon Archer, while his father was Vice President. Devon Archer and Hunter Biden spoke with Li about becoming partners in emails obtained from Hunter Biden's laptop.
In April 2011, after Hunter Biden travelled to China with his associates to search for prospective partners, he was copied on an email from Jim Bulger at Thornton Group—one of Hunter Biden’s associates—to Li at Bohai discussing future business opportunities. In April 2013, Hunter Biden was copied on another email from the Chinese. “I just had a word with Jonathan. He confirmed that he had already instructed his lawyers to start drafting our fund cooperation for all the related parties/partners,” Michael Lin from Thornton wrote.
You can read two of those emails below:
File
04_28_2011 - Thanks, From-Jim Bulger, To-Jonathan Li.pdf
File
04_15_2013 - Fund Update, From-Michael Lin, To-James Bulger and Devon Archer.pdf

Sometime after Joe Biden’s announcement of his candidacy, ownership of Skaneateles, LLC—and the 10% stake in BHR along with it—was transferred from Hunter Biden to Morris. Another Hunter Biden lawyer, Chris Clark, told the New York Times in the fall of 2022 that the younger Biden “no longer holds any interest, directly or indirectly, in either BHR or Skaneateles.” After Kevin Morris’ acquisition of Skaneateles was complete, Hunter Biden’s debt to Jonathan Li for $250,000 was transferred, and he was no longer responsible for repayment of the loan, the FBI learned.
Morris, a successful Hollywood lawyer who worked on the first son’s legal team, was identified by the New York Times as the individual who paid off Hunter Biden’s overdue taxes in the form of loans. He gained some degree of fame after he represented the producers of the "South Park" TV series in a $1.4billion deal, and later won a Tony award as a producer!Hunter Biden got $250k loan from Chinese exec during 2020 election, later his lawyer assumed debt of the blockbuster musical "The Book of Mormon."
His association with and loans to the younger Biden were uncovered during IRS Whistleblower Gary Shapley’s testimony to Congress this summer.
You can read that transcript below:
File
Whistleblower 1 Transcript_Redacted.pdf
“In late 2019-2020, a Kevin Patrick Morris comes into the picture. And he was described as meeting Hunter Biden at a campaign finance event. And he paid off several different tranches of tax due and owing, to include Federal and D.C. tax due and owing. And when they prepared some of these returns, they wrote that Kevin Patrick Morris gave him a loan for these. So that's also not taxable,” Shapley told interviewers.

This was not the only loan that Hunter Biden received from the Chinese. Just the News previously reported that another Chinese company set up a loan agreement with Hunter Biden for a $5 million, “interest-free” loan. The company in question, CEFC China Energy headed by Ye Jianming, intended the loan to be for the benefit of the Biden family. “This 5 million loan to BD family is interest-free,” an email obtained from Hunter Biden’s laptop read.
You can read that email below:
File
2017-07-26_-_11.49_-_Latest_update_from_DZ.pdf
That letter explains the role of an entity called Oneida "was made of five evenly divided LLCs, one for each business associate" – including Hunter Biden and James Biden. Ten percent of Hunter Biden’s interest was to be held for Joe Biden.
Hunter Biden’s one-time business partner Tony Bobulinski confirmed the loan arrangement in an interview he gave to the FBI, which was reviewed by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and addressed in an October 13, 2022 letter the senator sent to the Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss. “According to the interview summary, the money transferred to Oneida as part of the venture to compensate the Bidens was supposed to consist of an unsecured $5 million loan, intended to be forgivable, from CEFC in 2017,” Grassley wrote.
Hunter Biden’s one-time business partner Tony Bobulinski confirmed the loan arrangement in an interview he gave to the FBI, which was reviewed by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and addressed in an October 13, 2022 letter the senator sent to the Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss.
“According to the interview summary, the money transferred to Oneida as part of the venture to compensate the Bidens was supposed to consist of an unsecured $5 million loan, intended to be forgivable, from CEFC in 2017,” Grassley wrote.
You can read that letter below:
File
grassley_to_doj_fbi_weiss_political_bias_part_iii.pdf

Grassley also confirmed the transfer of the $5 million from Biden family bank records in his 2020 report with Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. “On Aug. 8, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to the bank account for Hudson West III,” the report read. Grassley and Johnson connected this transfer to the $5 million promised by Hunter Biden’s CEFC business partners.
In his testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee, IRS Whistleblower Joseph Ziegler described Hunter Biden’s habit of classifying payments from business partners, likely to avoid paying taxes.
“The money that he earned from Hudson West III, he tried to say that that was a loan,” Ziegler explained to the congressional investigators. “Same thing we have all going along back to Burisma -- I'm loaning from my own capital in the company -- even though he didn't put any capital in the Hudson West III. It was zero. So he was trying to say that it was a loan. But the accountants were so good that they really dug into it, and they were like: No, no, no, you can't deduct this -- or you can't take this as a loan on your tax return,” he continued.
You can read the transcript below:
File
Whistleblower 2 Transcript_Redacted.pdf

RELATED ARTICLES​

POLITICAL ETHICS

Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton at a portrait unveiling for Harry Reid

Step aside Hillary, Joe Biden may be new king of email scandals as new stash alarms investigators

By John Solomon

POLITICAL ETHICS

Gov. Gavin Newsom

Cal. Gov. Newsom solicited millions in donations to his wife’s charity, far-left orgs, records show

By Brandon Poulter/The Daily Caller News Foundation

POLITICAL ETHICS

Joe Biden, Sept. 22, 2023, Washington, D.C.

Archives locates 82,000 pages of Joe Biden pseudonym emails, possibly dwarfing Clinton scandal

By John Solomon
 
Congress issues subpoenas on creepy Joe's family to give them chance to 'splain things--why were they paid so much money fm foreigners, and what did they do to earn this money?

 

Revelations From Special Counsel David Weiss' Testimony On Hunter Biden Investigation​

BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, NOV 11, 2023 - 02:10 PM
Authored by Techno Fog via The Reactionary,

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/political...d-weiss-testimony-hunter-biden-investigation/

Ever since explosive whistleblower testimony detailing DOJ efforts to sabotage the Hunter Biden investigation was released this summer, the US Attorney (and now Special Counsel) in charge of that investigation – David Weiss – has been under siege.

Beset with allegations of misconduct by those who had been part of his investigative team, and self-inflicted mistakes such as allowing the statute of limitations on tax crimes to pass, Weiss (who was appointed Special Counsel in August) provided closed-door testimony this week before the House Committee on the Judiciary, led by Jim Jordan.
It was a rare opportunity to obtain testimony from a Special Counsel – they typically only testify after their reports have been completed. And while he refused to answer specifics concerning Hunter’s plea deal, the status of his investigation, and why he allowed the statute of limitations to pass on some of Hunter’s tax crimes, Weiss’s testimony does provide important context regarding what has transpired since his investigation began.
For background, Weiss has investigated Hunter Biden for approximately five years. According to the testimony of whistleblower Gary Shapley, a highly-credentialed IRS Criminal Supervisory Special Agent, this investigation “has been handled differently than any investigation I’ve ever been a part of for the past 14 years of my IRS service.” Agent Shapley explained:
“Some of the decisions seem to be influenced by politics. But whatever the motivations, at every stage decisions were made that had the effect of benefiting the subject of the investigation. These decisions included slow-walking investigative steps, not allowing enforcement actions to be executed, limiting investigators' line of questioning for witnesses, misleading investigators on charging authority, delaying any and all actions months before elections to ensure the investigation did not go overt well before policy memorandum mandated the pause. These are just only a few examples.”
As we noted back in June, the preferential treatment included: denials of normal investigative steps like looking into Hunter Biden’s communications; tipping off the Biden Transition Team that Hunter Biden would be interviewed; and refusing search warrants of Joe Biden’s home, though the Assistant US Attorney (Lesley Wolf) helping with the case admitted it was “likely” there would be evidence.
One of the biggest revelations from the whistleblowers was that Weiss, who was the Delaware US Attorney at the time, was denied authority to file charges against Hunter Biden in DC or California.
During his testimony, Weiss was able to provide some context on how that transpired.
In February of 2022, Weiss reached out to Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer “because we were looking to bring certain portions of our investigation to either D.C. or L.A.” In that call, Weiss raised the idea of being granted “Special Attorney” authority, which would have allowed him to bring the charges in those venues.
This requested wasn’t granted by Main Justice. Instead, Weinsheimer told Weiss to reach out to DC (and California) to see if they “would be interested in joining or otherwise participating in the investigation.”
Weiss then reached out to the US Attorneys for DC and the Central District of California (LA) regarding the potential to prosecute Hunter Biden for 2014-2015 tax crimes. These are the years where, according to the testimony of IRS whistleblower Shapley, Hunter Biden undertook a scheme to not report his foreign income from Burisma and “to evade his taxes through a partnership with a convicted felon.”
The US Attorney for DC denied his request: “I received word from my staff that the U.S. Attorney's Office in the District of Columbia had decided not to join the case as a partner or co-counsel moving forward.” (A remarkable declination from DC, considering their zealous prosecutions of January 6 protesters.)
The Central District of California also declined to help pursue the charges.
These denials are important because they were made by political appointees of President Biden. Main Justice, by ordering Weiss to go through this process, put Weiss in a position that he probably didn’t like – that he would have to pursue charges that were denied by other US Attorneys. (Weiss probably imagined the condemnations from the media.)
This left Weiss with a decision: whether to file the DC and California tax charges against Hunter Biden on his own. Weiss would testify that after the DC denial, Main Justice informed him that he had the authority under the “Special Attorney” regulations “to bring whatever charges you deem appropriate.”
Weiss, however, let the statute of limitations expire on Hunter Biden’s 2014 and 2015 tax crimes. Why Weiss decided not to go forward with these charges remains a mystery, especially considering that the DOJ Tax Division (and AUSA Wolf) recommended Biden be prosecuted for these years (see below for reference). Weiss declined to explain his non-prosecution decision, stating he could address this in his report.
Read the rest here - including:
  • Weiss's response as to whether it was "fair" that Hunter could avoid paying taxes on his Burisma income
  • Weiss's defense of AUSA Lesley Wolf, who was accused of covering for the Bidens
  • Weiss' thoughts on the future of his investigation as Special Counsel

MORE POLITICAL STORIES ON ZEROHEDGE​


Trump Lawyers To Mount Counterattack After Weeks Of Bruising Cross-Examination In NY Civil Case​



Trump's Veterans Day Message Was Quite Different From Biden's​



The Biden-Du Pont Nexus: From A Prestigious Golf Club To A Controversial Child Rape Plea Deal​


 
Minutes After New Hunter Indictment Erupts – His Dirtiest Hidden Secret Spills Out

By Mick Farthing | December 8, 2023

Link: https://pjnewsletter.com/hunter-indictment-erupt-secret/?utm_medium=email/


Minutes After New Hunter Indictment Erupts – His Dirtiest Hidden Secret Spills Out

SHARE
https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sha...ewsletter.com/hunter-indictment-erupt-secret/
23



Americans learned months ago that a special council was investigating Hunter Biden. He had been facing charges from the IRS over failure to pay taxes.
A plea deal would have protected him from other charges, but a federal judge rejected it.
Now, after months of speculation with little updates, federal prosecutors just made a bombshell announcement.
From The Post Millennial:
Hunter Biden has been indicted by a federal grand jury on 9 counts related to his tax returns. The indictment includes felonies.
The son of President Joe Biden has been indicted on nine counts regarding his tax returns. This case is related to claims by the IRS and investigators that Hunter failed to pay taxes over a period of years.
But that seems to be just the start. House Republicans have been accusing Hunter of a number of criminal acts–some involving the president himself. And it is possible their claims have the ring of truth, based on the allegations made in Hunter’s indictment.
From Fox News:
Hunter Biden’s Thursday indictment on federal charges in California revealed more than just his alleged failure to pay taxes over a years-long period, but rather what he was actually doing with the millions he was making in that time frame…
“Between 2016 and October 15, 2020, the Defendant spent this money on drugs, escorts and girlfriends, luxury hotels and rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and other items of a personal nature, in short, everything but his taxes,” the indictment read.
Hunter’s indictment on tax crimes might sound tame. But the actual file accuses Hunter of spending his money on a wide variety of things, instead of paying his taxes.
According to the special counsel, Biden spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on “adult entertainment” and “women.” He spent $683,212 on what the file called “various women,” including those with whom he had physical relationships.
The indictment reveals he spent $188,960 on a membership to a “sex club” as well as on exotic dancers and strip clubs.
But that is just the beginning. Hunter is being accused of trying to claim expenses paid to strippers and “escorts” as business expenses. The indictment also claims Biden filed money paid to sexual and romantic partners as wages.
In addition to these shocking allegations, the indictment accuses Hunter of spending thousands from his business line of credit at a strip club. Although the indictment does not appear to expressly state it, Americans will conclude much of this money was spent on prostitution.
According to the filing, Hunter burned through millions of dollars between 2016 to 2019. He was allegedly left with nothing after those wild years, depending on financial support through 2020. Yet even that money did not go through the IRS.

Key Takeaways:​

  • Federal prosecutors indicted Hunter Biden over tax evasion.
  • The indictment reveals Biden spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on strippers and “adult entertainment.”
  • Biden tried to claim payments to women and strip clubs as business expenses.
Source: The Post Millennial, Fox News
 
Back
Top