Conspiracy much?--WEF satanist-globalists working at former US base in Panama co-ordinating invasion of Jew S A by sh*t-skins, suckers

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

WEF Caught Orchestrating U.S. Border Crisis From Military Bases in Panama​


September 30, 2023 Sean Adl-Tabatabai

Link: https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-caught-orchestrating-u-s-border-crisis-from-military-bases-in-panama/

WEF orchestrating U.S. border crisis


The World Economic Forum (WEF) has taken control of several American military bases in Panama and is orchestrating the invasion of migrants that are flooding the U.S. southern border.

The WEF operation was exposed by political commentator Ann Vandersteel during her show “Right Now with Ann Vandersteel.”


Vandersteel recently visited the former site of Fort Clayton near the former Panama Canal Zone, once a heavy base of operations for the United States.

During her visit, she found out that the WEF had taken control of the area.
Newsaddicts.com reports: She took a picture of the WEF flag flying side-by-side with the Panamanian flag.
“I want you to take a good hard look right now, America,” she said.
“These flags you see?
“That’s right, the World Economic Forum flag flying overhead of the old SOUTHCOM (U.S. Southern Command) base, which was Fort Clayton in Panama.
“That’s right, next to the Panamanian flag.
“The U.S. government has abandoned Panama, which is the American crown jewel of Latin America.
“The United States military compounds are either totally rundown, or worse occupied by, as I said, globalist psychopaths.”
“We the Americans built the canal and we – our government, I should say – gave it away,” she added.
“Panamanians love Americans, and they’re asking: ‘Where are the Americans?’
“So just remember that the old SOUTHCOM base known as Fort Clayton today flies the World Economic Forum flag on top of it.”

The revelation that the WEF is taking over parts of Panama comes as reports indicate that the number of South American migrants arriving in Panama through the near-inhospitable environments of the Darien Gap on their journey to the U.S. will surpass the 400,000 mark before October.
These figures come from Panama’s National Migration Service, which reported that as of 6 a.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 27, 399,606 South American migrants had entered the country through the Darien Gap.
The crisis for Panama has especially worsened in September, with the daily number of migrants pouring in through the jungles of the Darien Gap exceeding 2,000 people.
The unprecedented number of migrants crossing through Panama beat the record of 248,000 migrants set last year and 2021’s similarly record-breaking number of 133,000.
Of the 400,000 migrants that have already crossed Panama’s southern border this year, over 324,000 were from South America, including 252,000 Venezuelans, nearly 48,000 Ecuadorians and more than 13,000 Colombians.
Nearly 40,000 migrants are from the Caribbean, around 28,000 are Asians and a little under 8,000 are Africans.
Panamanian officials warn that, despite the slew of new measures the government has implemented in an attempt to curb record migration, the number of migrants and so-called asylum seekers that could enter the country through the Darien Gap could reach more than half a million before the year ends.
 
Last edited:

WEF Member: 90% Population Reduction Would Solve Globalists’ ‘Problems’​

8cba3174a095e11a787c2b1268dc9916
Frank BergmanOctober 9, 2023 - 12:57 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/wef-membe...lve-globalists-problems/?utm_source=mailpoet/

[see vids at site link, above]

jane-goodall-wef-population-reduction-solve-problems.jpg


A World Economic Forum (WEF) member told her fellow globalists that all of their “problems” would be solved if the Earth’s population was 90 percent smaller than it is today.
English primatologist and anthropologist Jane Goodall, who the WEF lists as one of its “agenda contributors,” made the statement during a panel discussion at the organization’s annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.
Goodall’s comments have gathered renewed attention after a clip of her statement at the summit was recently shared on Twitter/X.
During the panel discussion, participants were discussing the hurdles they face with ushering in the WEF’s agenda to a non-compliant public.
They complained about the pushback to unpopular policies for fighting “climate change” and ending capitalism.

Goodhall then bemoaned the size of the world’s human population, suggesting that Earth would be better with far fewer people on it.
“We cannot hide away from human population growth,” she told frustrated elites.
“Because it underlies so many of the other problems,” she continued.
“All of these problems that we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of the population that it was 500 years ago.”

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

In 2023, Earth’s human population is estimated to be 8 billion people.
500 years ago, as Goodall, a renowned anthropologist, would know, the population of humans was approximately 435 million.

To satisfy Goodall’s suggestion to solve globalists’ “problems,” 90% of humanity would need to go.
Of course, WEF-sponsored “fact-checkers” will scramble to tell you that directly quoting Goodall’s comments is “misinformation” and you shouldn’t believe your lying ears.

However, Goodall is not the first WEF member to promote the “advantages” of a smaller population of humans.
As Slay News reported, another celebrated WEF member called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”
Meadows is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and a member of the World Economic Forum.
Despite his book being published over 50 years ago, his very anti-human ideology remains a key inspiration for the agenda of the WEF and its founder Klaus Schwab.
Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

During a 2017 interview, Meadows claimed that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”
However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”
“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population.
“If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.

“But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.
“And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.
“I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

It’s no coincidence that Meadows’ words echo the words in the 1995 report titled “United Nations Agenda 2030: Global Biodiversity Assessment.”
The report, first presented at the United Nations “climate change” conference COP1, states:
An ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people …
In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion.
As Slay News has reported, Yuval Noah Harari, a top WEF member and senior advisor to Schwab, declared last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world.

According to Harari, most of the general public have now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.
Harari, who describes himself as a historian and futurist, argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”
In September last year, Harari gloated that “climate change” will create a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth.
He suggested that the “technological Noah’s Ark” would only be beneficial to wealthy “elites” who can save themselves while the rest of humanity perishes.
Meanwhile, an official parliamentary inquiry found in August that Germany has funneled billions of dollars in taxpayer money to Bill Gates’s foundation to fund “population control” programs and other anti-humanity schemes, as Slay News reported.
The German government was forced to reveal the funding after being compelled to hand over records by investigating politicians from the parliamentary group DIE LINKE.
The response to the inquiry revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has received around 3.8 billion euros ($4.15 billion) in funding from the German government.
The funds have been directed toward various projects and programs related to globalist initiatives.
The documents show German taxpayers have handed over billions of dollars to pay schemes including population control programs and the

United Nations Agenda 2030.

READ MORE: All Covid Variants Were Engineered in BioLabs, Study Finds [see https://slaynews.com/news/all-covid-variants-engineered-biolabs-study-finds/]
 

Breaking: WEF Whistleblower Warns of Globalist Plan to Microchip Population​

by Adan Salazar
October 18th 2023, 6:30 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/brea...ns-of-globalist-plan-to-microchip-population/

Globalists will attempt to coerce populations to inject implantable microchips under their skin in order to access CBDC and UBI, warns German economist Richard Werner.

Werner claims RFID featured on debit, credit cards are 'conditioning' people to gradually accept 'contactless' interactions as normal.

The global elite plan to coerce people to take implantable microchips by requiring them in order to access digital currencies, Universal Basic Income (UBI) and other services, a former World Economic Forum member has warned.

German economist and former WEF ‘Global Leader for Tomorrow’ turned whistleblower Richard Werner urged caution on the emerging technologies during a discussion last year at the International Science Summit 2022, saying the WEF has purposely stopped short of showing people what a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) would look like because it will involve an under-the-skin implant about the size of a grain of rice.

Former WEF 'Global Leader for Tomorrow' turned whistleblower, economist Professor Richard Werner, explains how—according to his sources—CBDCs will ultimately be held on small microchips implanted under the skin, and Universal Basic Income will be used to entice people into… pic.twitter.com/ynBoAPhDRY
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) October 18, 2023

“And that grain of rice is your entire wallet?” an interviewer asked Werner, to which he replied, “Yes, it’s your digital ID, your wallet, it can be your passport, your key.”

Werner highlighted RFID technologies featured on debit and credit cards that allow data to be transferred via a swipe are “conditioning” people to gradually accept “contactless” interactions as an everyday part of life.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/brain...=banner&utm_content=brainforceflashsalebanned
“Now of course what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they’ve already now moved to the system in RFID chips, RFID technology where you just wave the thing. Contactless,” Werner described. “That is sort of conditioning us in this direction that in the future you’ll just wave your hand because you’ve got the microchip implant under your skin.”

“And each step there’s a rational reason,” he continued. “It’s easier just to wave this, isn’t it? It’s much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that, to just wave it as quicker.”

“But the next rationalization would be, well, but you can lose your card, somebody can steal your card, and then you’re just waving, it’s kind of risky, well, wouldn’t it be nice if you couldn’t lose it, and nobody could steal it? You know.”

Werner says humans would naturally be inclined to reject such invasive technologies “because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin,” however, he says globalists are prepared to use UBI to entice and persuade populations to receive the injections.

“The billionaire elites have so far not liked that. But since 2015, they’ve all come out. I mean, all the big billionaires and World Economic Forum have come out, oh, this is a good idea, universal basic income. Well, why suddenly, now? Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant,” Werner explains.

The WEF member-turned-whistleblower went on to explain Covid-19 plays a role in the microchip scheme as it introduced the need for a digital ID, information which would also “conveniently” be stored on an implantable microchip.

Indeed, it appears nightmarish predictions of a giant surveillance panopticon, where every movement, purchase, heartbeat, and breath are closely monitored, are now approaching reality.

Will humanity rise up and reject the chip?
 
Last edited:

Biden Declares US Will Build ‘New World Order’​

by RT
October 22nd 2023, 10:02 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/biden-declares-us-will-build-new-world-order/

The current system has “run out of steam,” puppet president tells supporters in a campaign speech.

The current US-led world order has “sort of run out of steam,” but Washington will shape the system that replaces it, US President Joe Biden told supporters on Saturday. Leaders in Moscow and Beijing, however, have argued otherwise.

Speaking at a campaign reception in Washington, Biden bragged about how he convinced Japan and South Korea to send financial aid to Ukraine, and how he signed a rail and ports deal with the EU, India, and Saudi Arabia at the G20 summit in New Delhi last month.

“So, I think we have an opportunity to do things, if we’re bold enough and have enough confidence in ourselves, to unite the world in ways that it never has been,” Biden declared.

“We were in a post-war period for 50 years where it worked pretty damn well, but that’s sort of run out of steam. Sort of run out of steam. We need a new, new world order in a sense,” he continued.

The world order that emerged following the Second World War was a bipolar one, with the US and USSR vying for influence and geopolitical supremacy. The collapse of the Soviet Union ushered in a unipolar world order, with the US the sole superpower. As the USSR disintegrated, then-US President George HW Bush proclaimed victory in the Cold War and the dawning of a “new world order” in his 1991 State of the Union address.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/the-g...=banner&utm_content=greatawakeningautographed
Three decades later, and with Washington scrambling for funds to fight two foreign wars, American dominance is less assured. China’s economy was the world’s eleventh largest in 1991, but is now second to only the US’. With Beijing expanding its nuclear arsenal and modernizing its military, President Xi Jinping has referred to the US-led West as “declining” on multiple occasions, and hailed the emergence of a “multipolar world,” in which international relations are governed by laws and treaties, rather than US-enforced “rules.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin has also spoken at length about building a multipolar world, describing such an order as one in which individual “civilization-states” are free to pursue their own interests free from the dictates of a hegemonic power like the US. Russia, China, and their partners in the BRICS group and across the Global South all share this goal, Putin told China Central Television (CCTV) last week.

“We proceed from the fact that all people are equal, everyone has the same rights, the rights and freedoms of one country and one people end where the rights and freedoms of another person or of an entire state start. This is how a multipolar world should gradually be born,” Putin told the Chinese network.
 
Last edited:

WEF Professor: Parents Must Apply for License to Have Children​

Link: https://evol.news/news/wef-professo...-to-have-children/?utm_source=newsletter-441/

klaus-schwab-pregnant-woman-license-children-wef.jpg


A World Economic Forum (WEF) professor has declared that would-be parents must apply for a license from the government before giving birth to children.
According to Connor Kianpour from the WEF-funded University of Colorado Boulder, parents will need to prove that they accept the pro-pedophilia and transgender agenda of the globalist elite before being granted a license.

In his paper, headlined “The Kid’s Aren’t Alright: Expanding the Role of the State in Parenting,” the WEF official argues that the government should take over the primary responsibility for the raising of children.
This should pose no problems because biological parents have “no right” to raise their own children, he boldly asserts in the paper published in the Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy.
“Individuals have no right to rear their biological children, nor do they have any interests weighty enough to justify a right to rear children generally,” Kianpour states.
“Since these rights do not exist, regulated parenting policies cannot be said to jeopardize them.”
 

Must Watch! Weaponized Migration Program Exposed: Documentary Tracks Entire Illegal Alien Route From Ecuador To U.S.​

by Jamie White
January 16th 2024, 5:27 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/must...tire-illegal-alien-route-from-ecuador-to-u-s/

Route involves crossing the Darién Gap, getting smuggled into Mexico by the Sinaloa Cartel, and riding the Mexican Train of Death to reach U.S. southern border.

An explosive documentary by independent journalists exposes the globalist-run weaponized migration program by tracking the route used by the illegal aliens to reach the U.S. southern border.

Muckraker journalists embedded themselves with a migrant caravan along a vast migration trail spanning thousands of miles from Quito, Ecuador to the United States border, revealing the industrialized scale of the mass migration scheme facilitated by cartels, governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

“This video will expose the entire illegal alien pipeline for what it is: a United Nations weaponized migration agenda masquerading as an organic humanitarian crisis,” Muckraker journalist Anthony Rubin begins in the documentary.

United States Invasion Route Exposed – FIRST EVER DOCUMENTARY REVEALING THE ENTIRE ILLEGAL ALIEN ROUTE FROM QUITO, ECUADOR TO THE UNITED STATES

Muckraker followed the entire mass migration trail from Quito, Ecuador to the United States border, a journey which included:

Crossing… pic.twitter.com/ZedZvUwcGK
— Muckraker.com (@realmuckraker) January 16, 2024

“This agenda directly benefits cartels and human smugglers, exposes the United States to incredible geopolitical threats, and could potentially usher in permanent one-party rule.”
https://www.infowarsstore.com/catal...=banner&utm_content=DNAForceBlackFridaybanned
The Muckraker journalists explain how the millions of migrants make their way through the lengthy trek with the help of shady NGOs and transnational cartels.

The journey included “Crossing the Darién Gap. Discovering secret Chinese hotels. Getting smuggled into Mexico by the Sinaloa Cartel. Embedding with a massive caravan. Riding the Mexican Train of Death. And finally, getting kidnapped by the Gulf Cartel,” the group wrote on X.

“In this documentary, you will learn how the United Nations is executing an industrial scale weaponized migration program and you will see the entire route that millions of illegal aliens are following to the United States every year!” they added.

Muckraker had previously exposed secret hotels catered to Chinese migrants in Ecuador as part of a large “migration network” that reaches the U.S.

Over 10 million illegal aliens have crossed into the U.S. since Joe Biden captured the White House in 2021, according to Customs and Border Patrol data, creating an unprecedented national security and humanitarian crisis in border states and so-called “sanctuary cities” alike.
 
Last edited:

They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 47 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch​

January 5, 2025 10:09 pm by CWR
by Michael

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/they...e-that-will-make-you-want-to-lose-your-lunch/

There is a clear consensus among the global elite that overpopulation is the primary cause of the most important problems that our world is facing today. Many of them are completely convinced that humans are literally a “plague” upon the Earth and that extreme measures are required to prevent us from destroying the entire planet. To the elite, everything from global warming to our growing economic problems can be directly traced back to a lack of population control. They warn that if nothing is done about our exploding population, humanity will be facing a future full of poverty, war and suffering on a filthy, desolate planet. They complain that it “costs too much” to keep elderly patients that are terminally ill alive, and they eagerly promote “family planning” in developing nations as a way to combat population growth. Of course just about anything that reduces the human population in any way is a positive thing for those that believe in this philosophy. This very twisted philosophy is being promoted in our movies, in our television shows, in our music, in countless books, on many of our most prominent websites, and it is being taught at top colleges and universities all over the world. The people that are promoting this philosophy have very, very deep pockets, and they are actually convinced that they are helping to “save the world” by controlling the growth of the human population. In fact, many of them truly believe that they are engaged in a “life or death” struggle for the fate of the planet.

The population of the world is currently sitting just above 8 billion, and the UN expects it to peak at 10.3 billion later this century…
The world’s population is expected to grow by more than 2 billion people in the next decades and peak in the 2080s at around 10.3 billion, a major shift from a decade ago, a new report by the United Nations said Thursday.
From the time of Charles Darwin all the way to today, we have been relentlessly warned about what would happen if something was not done to reduce population growth.
Of course the dire consequences that we were warned about have never actually come to fruition.
But that hasn’t stopped the elite from continuing to issue even more warnings.

The following are 47 shocking population control quotes from the global elite that will make you want to lose your lunch…

1. Charles Darwin: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”
2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.”
3. John D. Rockefeller: “The population problem must be recognized by government as a principal element in long-range planning.”
4. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”
5. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”
6. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
7. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving—that’s what I’m for. . . . It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”
8. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”
9. Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson: “The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself…It is time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity of human beings in this country and on this planet…All the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation and access to birth control.”
10. Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
11. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”
12. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”
13. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”
See also Maybe we can throw Slovakia a few billions right? Ain't that what we do?
14. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”
15. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”
16. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”
17. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.”
18. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses (microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like bacteria growing on an agar plate, flourishing until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a matter of time until microbes once again assert control over our population, since we are unwilling to control it ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at least four decades and is nothing new. People just don’t want to hear it.”
19. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.”
20. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.”

21. Bill Nye: “In 1750, there were about a billion humans in the world. Now, there are well over seven billion people in the world. It more than doubled in my lifetime. So all these people trying to live the way we live in the developed world is filling the atmosphere with a great deal more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than existed a couple of centuries ago. It’s the speed at which it is changing that is going to be troublesome for so many large populations of humans around the world.”
22. Actress Cameron Diaz: “I think women are afraid to say that they don’t want children because they’re going to get shunned. But I think that’s changing too now. I have more girlfriends who don’t have kids than those that do. And, honestly? We don’t need any more kids. We have plenty of people on this planet.”
23. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
24. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”
25. Stephen Hawking: “In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9 per cent per year. If it continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder.”
26. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.”
27. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”
28. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
See also Anchors Lose Their Minds On LIVE AIR! MSNBC PLUMMETS Into INSANITY
29. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
30. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”
31. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”
32. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”
33. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”
34. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.”
35. Another quote from John Holdren: “If population control measures are not initiated immediately and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”
36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”
38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
41. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”
42. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”
43. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
44. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number of children who are starving to death in impoverished countries.”
45. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”
46. Bill Gates: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”
47. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”


Majority Leader Thune says Trump needs to understand what’s “realistic” in the Senate.

This is turning into the dystopia from Back to the Future II
 
Back
Top