ANOTHER poisonous, genocidal attempt by Bill Gates to mass-murder the people--now w. food-coating applied to food, fruits, veggies, etc., by spray

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Bill Gates, World Economic Forum Push for APEEL Food Coatings Sold in Stores Now, Come With Serious Dangers​

CORRUPTION, Evil, GREAT RESET, NEW WORLD ORDER, Other Writers, RELATIVISM

Texans Jack & Dodie, Clever Journey, 11/23

Link: https://patriotandliberty.com/bill-...sold-in-stores-now-come-with-serious-dangers/

The global elite, imperiously ecstatic about their oppressive reign over humanity during the COVID-19 pandemic, continue with more attempts to control the world.
th-2429907034.jpg

Often listed among the best-funded synthetic biology companies, in 2018, Apeel’s founder and CEO, James Rogers, remarked that his company would soon use synbio instead of extracting its ingredients from agricultural byproducts (grape seed leftover from juice, wine, etc.). Within months, Rogers was announced as a WEF Young Global Leader in 2020.
th-4256141390.jpg
Rogers
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) has serious concerns about Rogers’ products being sprayed on vegetables and fruits sold in certain stores across America and other countries.
OCA’s direct opinion serves as a powerful warning for consumers:
“Given everything else Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum expect us to swallow or inject, we can’t be too skeptical, but are the problems with Apeel on the same level as other food safety concerns?
Is it as important to avoid Apeel as it is to reject genetically engineered foods? Toxic pesticides? Factory-farmed animal products laced with livestock drugs, including mRNA vaccines? Indigestible insects? Lab-grown meat-replacements?
Our conclusion is that Apeel carries the same health problems of similar preservatives commonly used to extend the shelf-life of ultra-processed food.

New World Order (NWO) leaders now control the World Economic Forum (WEF) and World Health Organization (WHO), associated sinister groups of self-appointed saviors, self-serving Non-Governmential Organizations (NGOs), and corrupt career politicians who are scheming to use this carefully designed opportunity to expand their foundation of manipulation and control across as many facets of daily life as possible.
th-1996142806.jpg

A close focus on Apeel reveals that this $2 billion-plus company makes synthetic fungicide/fruit coating claiming to extend the shelf-life of food.
James Rogers received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). They provided (at the very least, as known) original grants in 2012 and 2015 to Apeel Sciences of $99,995 and $985,161, respectively.
U.S. companies such as Kroger, Wal-Mart, and Target are joining the narratives of promoting Apeel for the cause of eliminating “food waste.”
th-3914120724.jpg

Much like climate change or Big Pharma propagandists and promoters, Apeel has a presence in 8 countries, operating 30 supply networks and distributing produce to 40 retail partners, which then goes out to tens of thousands of stores around the world.
Their story is that Apeel is made from grapeseed. That sounds like music to consumers’ ears, but that’s not the whole truth.
screenshot_20231109_192729_duckduckgo.jpg

There are three petrochemical solvents involved in making the product, which are highly toxic, including toluene, which is in gasoline.
There are also 5 heavy metals in the product: palladium, arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury.
Apeel Sciences applied to the FDA for their GRAS (or “generally regarded as safe”) notification, and were granted it based on the claim that “safe” levels of those substances are left on the food.
It’s never safe to ingest mercury or lead and these toxic substances accumulate in our bodies.
There are many questions from food scientists, physicians, and nutritionists concerning how such products are being reviewed and approved under the current organic regulations. The questions center heavily around exactly how solvents and residues are evaluated by material review organizations including the Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI).
Organipeel, the Apeel fruit coating product in May 2023, was approved as a fungicide, but not a produce coating.
fb_img_1699544877667281292822928129.jpg
fb_img_16995448776672812928329.jpg
They do not sell Apeel treated products
fb_img_16995448776672812928229.jpg
They do sell Apeel coated food.
fb_img_16995448776672812928129.jpg

The “active ingredient” in Organipeel is citric acid, which can be used as a fungicide. But citric acid makes up a mere 0.66% of the product. Organipeel’s other ingredients are what make the product work. According to Apeel’s own website:
Apeel dramatically slows the rate that produce spoils. By maintaining moisture and reducing oxidation, Apeel supports the plant’s natural abilities to protect against environmental stress.
Apeel products are “an extra ‘peel’ of protection made by adding another layer of what naturally exists on the fruits and veggies already.”

Many professionals are concerned about how these edible coatings may also pose a risk to consumers, particularly those with allergies, sensitivities, and chronic illness and/or disability. The populations facing the biggest risk are often the ones that rely on organic food as a safe haven.
As anyone with allergies knows, not knowing what you are being exposed to can be deadly.
 

EXPOSED: Bill Gates’s Relationship with Convicted Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Revolved Around a Global Health Investment Fund​

Link: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...olved-around-a-global-health-investment-fund/

1,118
(Photos: Rick Friedman, Fabrice Coffrini, Timothy A. Clary/Getty Images)
Rick Friedman, Fabrice Coffrini, Timothy A. Clary/Getty Images

SEAMUS BRUNER 25 Nov 2023

Earlier this month, I revealed that one of Bill Gates’s most powerful business partners, JPMorgan Chase, had reached a combined $365 million settlement with Jeffrey Epstein’s victims and the U.S. Virgin Islands, which a federal judge approved on November 9.
My new book Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life digs deeper into Gates’s partnership with JPMorgan and how it led to Gates’s relationship with Epstein via a top JPMorgan executive named James E. “Jes” Staley.
je-bg-ls-640x480-1.jpg

In this photograph obtained by the New York Times of a gathering at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2011, the following individuals are seen (from left to right): James E. Staley, who was a senior JPMorgan executive in 2011; former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers; Jeffrey Epstein; Microsoft Co-founder Bill Gates; and Boris Nikolic, who was a science adviser for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (New York Times)
Over time, Gates and JPMorgan established an investment fund that sought to profit from the development of vaccines and other health technologies. Epstein wanted a piece of the action, and Staley brought Epstein into the Gates partnership.
The Gates-JPMorgan partnership was called the Global Health Investment Fund (GHIF) and was created circa 2011. At the time, Staley managed the Epstein relationship for the bank, and Epstein was a valuable client who brought JPMorgan a lot of business. Epstein was an adviser to billionaires like Victoria’s Secret mogul Leslie Wexner and Wall Street legend Leon Black and the “family offices” which manage their fortunes. Wexner and Black deny any involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities.
GettyImages-909995906.jpg

James “Jes” Staley is interviewed on Bloomberg Television during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 25, 2018. (Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The GHIF partnership brought in a host of other powerful investors, including The Pfizer Foundation, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, as well as entities funded by the governments of Sweden, Canada, and Germany. There would also be private support from “qualified individuals and family offices.”
The GHIF’s purpose was to give “individual and institutional investors the opportunity to finance late-stage global health technologies that have the potential to save millions of lives in low-income countries.” The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency committed to help offset any potential GHIF losses.
As the GHIF was getting started, Epstein began pitching other business ideas to Gates and his foundation staff. They met “many times,” according to the New York Times, and Gates flew on Epstein’s Gulfstream plane from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach, Florida, according to a March 2013 flight manifest.
It turned out that Gates and Epstein had mutual interests in the areas of global health and funding scientific breakthroughs. Both men also had a deep interest in genetic tinkering projects. Epstein reportedly wanted to “seed the human race” with his own DNA by impregnating scores of women. Ironically (or perhaps hypocritically), Epstein was concerned about overpopulation.
GettyImages-589141200.jpg

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein is seen in this photo taken in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on Sept. 8, 2004. (Rick Friedman/Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis via Getty Images)
Likewise, Gates has long been worried about overpopulation and has stated repeatedly that he wants to mass vaccinate the third world, specifically for the purpose of curbing population growth. In a 2010 TED Talk, Gates succinctly explained his rationale for funding vaccines and birth control to curtail population growth worldwide.
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion,” Gates warned. “Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, ten or fifteen percent.”
But Epstein worried that saving lives by curing diseases would not lower population growth rates. He “criticized efforts to reduce starvation and provide health care to the poor because doing so increased the risk of overpopulation,” the New York Times reported. Bill and Melinda Gates apparently do not see curing diseases in the same way.
GettyImages-1232681259.jpg

Bill Gates (left) and his wife Melinda hold a press conference in New York on December 2, 1998, to announce a $100 million gift to establish the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program. (TIMOTHY A. CLARY/Getty Images)
GettyImages-522830804.jpg

Bill Gates speaks to world leaders about global vaccine immunization push at a conference in London on June 13, 2016. (Paul Hackett/In Pictures via Getty Images Images)
GettyImages-1706405681.jpg

Bill Gates holds up a vaccine during a press conference at the World Health Organization (WHO) assembly to make a push for vaccine programs on May 17, 2011, in Geneva, Switzerland. (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)
GettyImages-1219646941.jpg

Melinda Gates and Bill Gates speak about the COVID-19 pandemic during the “One World: Together At Home” broadcast by Global Citizen on April, 18, 2020, to support the World Health Organization (WHO). (Getty Images)
While Melinda has acknowledged that saving lives to reduce population may seem counterintuitive, it is not how she views the issue. “When more children live past the age of five,” she said in a 2018 interview, “population sizes don’t go up, they go down.”
Crucial to this formula are the population control efforts into which Bill and Melinda Gates and their foundation pour billions of dollars: contraceptives, pills, and abortion (or, as Melinda describes it, allowing mothers to “decide if and when to have children”).
The simple formula for Gates’s plan to save the world appeared to be the following: vaccines plus abortion plus birth control equals sustainability. As Controligarchs reveals, it just so happens that Bill Gates and his associates profit from both sides of this equation.
After JPMorgan and Gates teamed up on the global health fund, Epstein pitched an idea for a separate partnership, envisioning “a vast fund, seeded with the Gates Foundation’s money, that would focus on health projects around the world,” the New York Times reported.

However, any future plans involving Epstein were scrapped once he was charged with sex trafficking minors in July 2019. Naturally, his friends and associates began distancing themselves from him, and Melinda Gates claims that she divorced Bill in 2021 due to his relationship with Epstein. Bill Gates has denied having any involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Epstein reportedly hung himself in his prison cell under mysterious circumstances in August 2019.
The GHIF continued its work after the Gates-JPMorgan-Epstein connections were exposed. It had backed mRNA technologies at least five years before the COVID-19 pandemic, and at least four of the companies that the GHIF invested in—Atomo Diagnostics, AccessBio, GeneDrive, and Univercells—“actively worked to address the COVID-19 pandemic through efficient diagnostics that help identify and track cases and the application of innovative technologies for vaccine development and manufacturing.”

Seamus Bruner is the author of Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life and Peter Schweizer’s Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute. Follow him @SeamusBruner.
 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Accuses Bill Gates of Exploiting Philanthropy for Personal Gain​

November 25, 2023 10:42 pm by CWR

Link: https://citizenwatchreport.com/robe...of-exploiting-philanthropy-for-personal-gain/

[see vids at site link, above]

Kennedy claims that Gates strategically utilizes his donations to organizations like the WHO, gaining control and influencing global health policies, while simultaneously profiting from the vaccines distributed through these initiatives. According to Kennedy, this pattern raises concerns about the true motives behind Gates’ philanthropy and its impact on public health initiatives worldwide.

See also Rep. Jim Banks Accuses Nancy Pelosi of Blocking Investigation into January 6th, Alleges Cover-Up and Partisan Agenda by Committee

See also IDF at the Gates of Gaza City. The Battle Has Begun
 

Bill Gates Still Trying To Convince People To Take Ineffective “Vaccines”​

by Mac Slavo | SHTFPlan.com
January 24th 2024, 6:00 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bill...convince-people-to-take-ineffective-vaccines/

[see vid at site link, above]

Gates is going to continue to come up with new ways to get whatever the genocidal maniacs in the ruling class want in these injections.

Bill Gates is on what appears to be a never-ending quest to inject the world’s human population with as many “vaccines” as possible. He was currently at Davos, where he was once again peddling his injections. “We will have new vaccines. We’ll have a TB vaccine, malaria vaccine, HIV vaccine” and new COVID-19 vaccines, he said.

The question that immediately springs to mind is this: will the new HIV “vaccine” be helpful for those who get VAIDS from other “vaccines”? Remember, Gates developed a “vaccine” to protect against vaccine-induced polio. If that doesn’t tell you everything you need to know about this sociopath and vaccines, then nothing will.

Sadly, despite their ineffectiveness, almost 30 million doses of Gates’ malaria vaccine will be dispatched to Africans over the next few months as Cameroon launched the world’s first malaria vaccination program. The malaria vaccine is only 13% effective at preventing malaria. Nets and malaria tablets have proven to be better either way and yet these injections are still being used on human beings.

Not to mention that the malaria “vaccine” is so effective that four doses are required, with all four to be completed within two years of birth. A fifth dose will be considered after one year in areas of high risk and then maybe you’ll get 13% effectiveness.

WHO Now Openly Admitting Vaccines Cause More Polio Than Actual Wild Virus
https://www.infowarsstore.com/healt...anner&utm_content=DJNFoundationalEnergybanned
Using a prophylactic dose, malaria tablets on their own are 90% effective at preventing malaria, and that really beats the “vaccine” by a wide margin!

Last week, CNBC-TV18 interviewed Bill Gates on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos about his decision to spend more than ever before in 2024 on health “innovations” for low-income countries.

“Global Alliance for Vaccines helps buy vaccines – that’s based on the rich countries and Gates Foundation generosity – and we’re trying to make sure that as we go back to replenish that fund that we can raise as much as we did in the past,” Gates said during the interview. “[Health] is the most important work going on in the world, saving literally millions of lives. India is making progress we pilot a lot of these new ideas there and then scale them up to the entire world.”

He also praised the efforts of the ruling class using artificial intelligence to help create new injections that will be used on the human cattle. “AI will be beneficial in two ways it’ll accelerate the invention of new tools, new vaccines, new drugs. The rate of innovation will be much faster.”

Gates added: “We will have new vaccines. We’ll have a TB vaccine, malaria vaccine, HIV vaccine, and even the things like covid vaccines we need to make them have longer duration, more coverage and we’re going to change instead of using the needle to use a little patch. So, the pandemic really highlighted that we’ve been underinvested in those innovations and you know our partners in India are part of how we’re going to get these breakthrough products done.”

So brace yourself. Gates is going to continue to come up with new ways to get whatever the genocidal maniacs in the ruling class want in these injections. Then there will be so many that it’ll be impossible to tell which shot was responsible for the demise of the human. We are being treated with the same level of respect by these sociopaths as lab rats.
 
Last edited:

Dengue Fever Surges by 400% in Brazil After Bill Gates-Backed Gene-Edited Mosquitos Released​

by Jamie White
February 26th 2024, 11:45 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/deng...-gates-backed-gene-edited-mosquitos-released/

The UN's World Mosquito Program last year announced plan to release billions of gene-edited mosquitos in Brazil.

That mosquito program was partially funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Dengue fever has spiked fourfold in Brazil in 2024 following the release of millions of gene-edited mosquitos by the United Nations’ World Mosquito Program.
In the first five weeks of 2024, over 364,000 cases of dengue infection have been reported, according to the country’s health ministry, which is 4x greater than previous cases in the same period of 2023.

The dramatic spike in dengue cases has prompted Brazil to purchase millions of doses of the dengue vaccine.
From The Guardian:
The rapid spread of dengue has caused 40 confirmed deaths, the ministry said, and a further 265 are being investigated.
https://www.givesendgo.com/savealex
Brazil has bought 5.2m doses of the dengue vaccine Qdenga, developed by Japanese drugmaker Takeda, with another 1.32m doses provided at no cost to the government, a ministry statement said.
Three Brazilian states have declared emergencies, including the second most populous state, Minas Gerais, and the Federal District, where the capital, Brasília, is located and is facing an unprecedented rise in infections.
Brasília will start vaccinating children aged 10-14 on Friday with Qdenga, the local government said on Wednesday.

Cases of dengue in Brasília since the start of the year have exceeded the total for the whole of 2023, with a rate of infection of 1,625 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, compared with the national average of just 170.
The UN’s World Mosquito Program announced in 2023 a plan to release billions of gene-edited mosquitos in Brazil over a 10-year period in a bid to eradicate dengue fever in the country.
“Brazilian health officials in five cities have been releasing clouds of lab-grown Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia bacteria, which prevents dengue virus transmission to humans,” Harvard Public Health reported in August 2023.
“The country will be the first to launch a nationwide program to release Wolbachia-modified mosquitoes, which are expected to protect up to 70 million people from dengue fever over the next 10 years. And it’s building a factory to scale up mosquito production: Beginning 2024, the factory will mass-produce five billion mosquitoes a year.”
Now a year after the mosquito initiative began, dengue cases have risen sharply rather than fallen.
Notably, the World Mosquito Program received a $50 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also bankrolling research into the dengue fever vaccine.
The Brazilian government purchased over 5 million doses of the Qdenga dengue fever vaccine, manufactured by Japanese drugmaker Takeda, which also received millions of dollars in grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
In other words, Bill Gates Foundation money is involved in all sides of the situation, from the gene-edited mosquitos — which has apparently exacerbated the dengue crisis — to bankrolling companies who are providing the in-demand dengue fever vaccine to Brazil.
To what end?
 

What Is Bill Gates Up To? Irregularities in the Conduct of Studies Using HPV Vaccines in India​

By Colin Gonsalves
Global Research, April 19, 2024

Link: https://www.globalresearch.ca/bill-gates-hpv-vaccines-india/5855189/

Editorial-Use-Bill-Gates-Microphone-400x225.jpg

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Global Research Referral Drive: Our Readers Are Our Lifeline
***
After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by Path in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. Public memory fades quickly and politicians of all hues wait for this memory to fade so as to carry on regardless of the effect of their policies on the health of the nation.

In 2010, “the entire world was shocked by media reports about the deaths of female children in Andhra Pradesh after being administered the HPV vaccines. The project was reportedly funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.” The role of government agencies including ICMR and DCGI in approving these trials, the misuse of the government funds “for a private project of dubious nature”, the use of the logo of the NRHM to give it respectability and official endorsement, the approval of the trials by the National Ethical Committee, came under scrutiny by Parliament. Hugely perturbed “the Central Government directed an enquiry be conducted by the premier investigation agency, the state governments were advised not to carry out further vaccinations in the interim period.”
The committee appointed to investigate
“found the entire matter very intriguing and fishy… the monopolistic nature of the product being pushed and the unlimited market potential… are all pointers to a well-planned scheme to commercially exploit a situation… and would have generated windfall profits for the manufacturers by way of automatic sale, year after year without any promotional or marketing expense. The American organization Path resorted to subterfuge. The interest, safety and well beings of subjects were completely jeopardized by Path.
Thus as early as 2006, the main objective of Path was to facilitate the introduction of the HPV vaccine Gardasil into government funded immunization programme in India.”
The experts in the enquiry committee when asked, opined that “the design of the project itself was faulty. In the survey documents there was no column for serious adverse events even though much before the trials started, severe allergic reactions and other considerable side effects were well-known. Because ICMR was worried about bad publicity in case of side effects, Path did not provide for “urgent expert medical attention in cases of serious adverse events”, which were known or expected. There was no preparation to handle serious developments like cardiac arrest and seizures occurring at the sites of vaccine administration. There existed no insurance cover for the children.
New Big Data Study of 145 Countries Show COVID Vaccines Makes Things Worse (Cases and Deaths)
The Committee took a serious note of the fact that “both the Ethics Committees existed as a formality” and that there was “a clear dereliction of duty”. The credibility of the Universal Immunization Programme “was used to promote private, foreign interest” and recommended “practices of diverting public funds for advancing interest of a private agency should never be allowed in future.”
The Committee found that the project was “reportedly funded by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” and that the “vaccines were donated by the manufacturers.”
When the Committee desired to know “whether criminal enquiry was initiated against Path”, no answer was forthcoming. Commenting on the action taken report “the Committee was amazed at the audacity of DCGI to merely repeat various steps to be taken as if they were new additional measures. Except for slight amendment in the informed consent form, there was nothing new in the action taken report. No accountability had been fixed.”
Commenting on the American organization Path, the Committee was concerned that it set up an office without getting the required mandatory approvals / permissions. The Committee found it “surprising that security and intelligence agencies did not raise an eyebrow on a way a foreign entity entered India through the backdoor.” The Committee found the actions of Path “a serious breach of trust, of medical ethics, and a clear cut violation of the human rights of these girl children.”
The Parliamentary Standing Committee questioned the decision of ICMR to promote the drug in the Universal Immunization Programme in 2007 itself, before the vaccine was approved in India in 2008.
The Committee also affirmed the general guidelines of CDSCO that no trial can be conducted on children until trials are conducted on adults to determine efficacy and safety. The project envisaged vaccination of about 30,000 children in the age group of 10-14 years. What made things even more worrying was the deaths of children after receiving the vaccine. These were dismissed as “unrelated to vaccination without in-depth investigation.”
On informed consent the ICMR acknowledged that
“there were gross violations of norms in Andhra Pradesh. 9543 consent forms were signed, 1948 had thumb impressions, while hostel wardens signed 2763 forms.
In Gujarat 6217 were signed and 3944 had thumb impressions. Very large number of parents / guardians were illiterate and could not even sign in their local language. The wardens / teachers / head-masters were not given written permissions by the parents / guardians to sign on behalf of their girls. On many forms, witnesses had not signed. Neither the photographs, nor the photo ID cards of the parents / guardians / wardens is pasted in the consent form. On many forms, investigators had not signed. On some forms, signature of the parents / guardians is not matching with their names. The date of vaccination in some forms was much earlier than the date of signatures.”
The DG, ICMR admitted “that many consent forms were filled up by the principal on behalf of the students, he admitted gross violations in the recording of serious adverse effects also.” The Committee concluded that the consent forms were carelessly filled up “and were incomplete and inaccurate”, full of “grave irregularity”.
High officials admitted that the presence of ICMR in the Project Advisory Committee indicated “conflict of interest” and therefore ICMR had moral responsibility for the numerous irregularities reportedly committed. This dereliction of duty went to the extent of ICMR “apparently acting at the behest of the manufacturers”. For example, “States were not even capable of monitoring the adverse effects.” The machinations of Path came in for “the strongest condemnation”.
The Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) came in for scathing criticism as well.
“DCGI played a very questionable role… remained as a silent spectator even when its own rules and regulations were being so flagrantly violated.”
The Parliamentary Standing Committee found instances of conflict of interest in the composition of the Enquiry Committee. There was no disclosure by the members of the Enquiry Committee or by the experts. The Committee found that an individual availed the hospitality of the trial sponsors during a visit to Seoul to attend a conference, which fact was not disclosed. On enquiry, the Committee found that the conflict of interest though, “serious matter” was treated in a “casual manner”.
The success of vaccine manufacturers and promoters in getting away with myriad illegalities in the marketing of the HPV vaccines and its endorsement by the Prime Minister of India, ultimately paved the way for the secretive clearance of the COVID vaccines in India. Serious adverse events were kept top secret. Perhaps the number people who died due to vaccine related reasons will never be known. The sudden inexplicable deaths of young persons proximate to the taking of the vaccine will probably never be investigated.
The judiciary is loath to even allow any enquiry perhaps on the assumption that a judicial review could possibly lead to vaccine hesitancy.
In the meanwhile, the large numbers of COVID vaccine related deaths remains India’s best kept secret. But, that is another story; and there are excellent studies done which are waiting in the wings to be reported but cannot find a willing publisher. Such is the nature of freedom of the press in India.
 

WHO: Intel Agency for Gates Foundation?​

Examining the Foundation's prescient Aug. 2019 purchase of BioNTech stock.​

By John Leake
Global Research, April 22, 2024
Courageous Discourse

Link: https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-intel-agency-gates-foundation/5855404/

who-bill-gates-400x225.jpg

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Global Research Referral Drive: Our Readers Are Our Lifeline
***
Reviewing BioNTech’s Disclosure of Classes of Share Capital for the year ended December 31, 2019, I noticed the following:

On August 30, 2019, BioNTech entered into agreements with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). BMGF agreed to purchase 3,038,674 ordinary shares with nominal amount of k€ 3,039 of BioNTech for a total of k€49,864 (k$55,000). These agreements require BioNTech to perform certain research and development activities to advance the development of products for the prevention and treatment of HIV and tuberculosis. In the event of a breach of the underlying conditions, including such research and development activities, BMGF has the right to sell its shares back to BioNTech at the initial share price or fair market value, whichever is higher, subject to certain conditions. BioNTech’s ability to pay dividends is also limited under the terms of these agreements.
Less than two years after the Gates Foundation purchased the stock (pre-IPO) at $18 per share, it peaked on Aug. 6, 2021 at $389. At that price, the Foundation’s $55 million investment was worth $1,182,044,186.00 ($1.182 billion).
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F363525cb-ae97-4f0b-bba4-11eec92d98f0_1194x1628.png

On September 18, 2019—just nineteen days after the Gates Foundation took its huge position in BioNTech stock— a report titled A World At Risk was published by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was founded in 2018 by the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization.
The report’s title page is illustrated with an image of a coronavirus, and its text is an urgent call to action for the world to invest far more in preparedness for a respiratory viral pandemic. As the report states on page 8:
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7c70acd1-85a3-424c-a19c-aedc426ae553_1722x642.png


Video: “This is much worse than you can imagine.” FBI Had Agents Everywhere on January 6th

The report mentions nothing about the need to invest in bolstering bio-laboratory safety. It expressly warns about the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen “accidentally or deliberately released,” but its entire call to action is to invest a fortune to responding to such a pathogen instead of preventing it from being released in the first place.
This was in spite of numerous urgent warnings from Rutgers University biology professor Richard Ebright and others that many of the world’s bio-labs had a history of grave security lapses that were NOT being adequately addressed. In 2017, Professor Ebright expressed particular concern about the new BSL-4 lab that was about to open in Wuhan, China.
We now know that SARS-CoV-2 was officially detected in December of 2019 but probably emerged and started spreading in August or September of 2019—that is, around the same time A World At Risk was published.
The September 18, 2019 date of the report strongly suggests that someone doing bio-surveillance for the WHO in China obtained intelligence that a SARS coronavirus was already circulating.
Given that the Gates Foundation is the WHO’s second largest donor (after Germany, where BioNTech is headquartered) I wonder if this intelligence was passed to someonein the Gates Foundation months before December 31, 2019—the date the WHO claimed it received its first report of cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan.
Does the WHO—with its Country Offices obtaining bio-surveillance reports from the field—serve an an unofficial intelligence agency for the Gates Foundation?
If so, it would enable the Foundation to obtain extremely valuable information about emerging infectious disease pathogens—naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released—long before other market players obtain this information.
 
Back
Top