The swat-raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home was deliberately malicious, and creepy Joe admin wants everyone to know, suckers--FOX/Carlson explains

NEWS

[VIDEO] More Than One Dozen FBI Whistle Blowers Have Just Come Forward Over Mar-a-Lago Raid​

by Missy CraneAugust 15, 2022

Link: https://waynedupree.com/2022/08/fbi-whistle-blowers/?utm_campaign=TPI08152022PMLB

[see vids at site link, above]

[VIDEO] More Than One Dozen FBI Whistle Blowers Have Just Come Forward Over Mar-a-Lago Raid

Share

I had lost all hope for the FBI. I wrote them off because I thought if anyone in the “rank and file” was still a good egg, they would have blown the whistle by now. So, in my book, the entire organization was rotten from root to stem… But I may have been wrong about that because now I am hearing we’ve got a lot of whistleblowers. Almost a dozen, to be exact. And Jim Jordan said they’re coming forward because they’re disgusted over the FBI raid and the complete politicization of the bureau.

Okay, this sounds like some hope and progress…
Big League Politics reported that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) exposed in a Fox News interview on Sunday Night in America with Trey Gowdy that 14 FBI whistleblowers are speaking out against systemic corruption in their department after the unlawful raid on President Donald Trump’s Florida home.
“14 FBI agents have come to our office as whistleblowers, and they are good people. There are lots of good people in the FBI. It’s the top that’s the problem,” Jordan told Gowdy.

“But some of these good agents are coming to us telling us this is baloney what is going on – the political nature now of the Justice Department. God bless them for doing it, coming and talking to us about the school board issue and about a whole host of other issues,” Jordan continued.
“It’s becoming a well-worn trail of agents who are saying this has got to stop, and thank goodness for them, and thank goodness that the American people recognize it, and I believe they are going to make a big change on November 8,” he added, referring to the midterm elections.
 

DHS Whistleblower Leaks New Joint Intelligence Bulletin on ‘Domestic Violent Extremists’ Sent in Response To Mar-A-Lago Raid Outcry​

by Jamie White
August 16th 2022, 5:22 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/dhs-...s-sent-in-response-to-mar-a-lago-raid-outcry/

Leaked Department of Homeland Security document lists claims of “government overreach” and “election fraud” as domestic terrorism red flags.

A joint intelligence bulletin leaked by a Department of Homeland Security whistleblower shows how the federal government is responding to public outcry over the FBI’s raid on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.

The leaked DHS documents released by Project Veritas on Tuesday warn of heightened risks against federal agents following last week’s unprecedented raid of the 45th president’s Palm Beach resort.


“The threats we have observed, to date, underscore that DVEs [Domestic Violent Extremists] may view the 2022 midterm election as an additional flashpoint around which to escalate threats against perceived ideological opponents, including federal law enforcement personnel,” the bulletin states.

The memo goes on to claim that domestic violent extremists tend to view “government overreach” and “election fraud” as threats to America.

In recent years, DVEs adhering to different violent extremist ideologies have coalesced around perceptions of government overreach and election fraud to threaten and conduct violence. As a result of recent activities, we assess that potential targets of DVE violence moving forward could include law enforcement, judicial officials, individuals implicated in conspiracy theories, and perceived ideological opponents who challenge their worldview.
Click to expand...
A disclaimer on the bulletin warns agents not to share this material with the public.

“Information contained in this intelligence bulletin is for official use only. No portion of this bulletin should be released to the media, the general public, or over nonsecure Internet servers. Release of this material could adversely affect or jeopardize investigative activities.”

In a statement that was ratioed on Twitter shortly after the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, FBI Director Christopher Wray quickly attempted to portray the bureau as victims of “unfounded attacks” by critics, characterizing the public’s overwhelmingly negative reactions as “violence and threats against law enforcement.”

“Unfounded attacks on the integrity of the FBI erode respect for the rule of law and are a grave disservice to the men and women who sacrifice so much to protect others. Violence and threats against law enforcement, including the FBI, are dangerous and should be deeply concerning to all Americans,” Wray said in the statement.

Statement from #FBI Director Wray: https://t.co/Q0QFNkE0Ak pic.twitter.com/UJA8eTKNpu
— FBI (@FBI) August 11, 2022
Click to expand...

“Every day I see the men and women of the FBI doing their jobs professionally and with rigor, objectivity, and a fierce commitment to our mission of protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution. I am proud to serve alongside them.”

Read the leaked DHS bulletin: [ck site link, above, top]
 

BREAKING: President Trump Releasing Security Footage of FBI Raid at Mar-a-Lago​

By David Rufful
-August 18, 2022

Link: https://www.analyzingamerica.org/2022/08/665553/


OPINION | This article contains opinion. AnalyzingAmerica is licensed to publish this content.​


The FBI’s worst fears are coming true as President Donald Trump and his son, Eric, have vowed to release the security footage “at the right time.”
FBI agents demanded that security cameras be turned off during their raid at President Donald Trump’s private home at Mar-a-Lago. This never happened as the Mar-a-Lago staff refused to comply, according to Trump’s son Eric.
The Trump family watched as agents are seen behaving improperly and searching places they “shouldn’t have been.”
Agents reportedly searched Melania Trump’s wardrobe despite allegedly on the property to obtained classified documents.
The surveillance cameras were never turned off, Trump’s son Erics explained.
Trump’s attorney Christina Bobb was forced by FBI agents to wait at the end of the Mar-a-Lago driveway while they searched the property. Agents likely assumed the security cameras were off.

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

Trump’s attorney Christina Bobb said the Trumps were “actually able to see the whole thing” while in New York.
“They actually have a better idea of what took place inside,” she said.
More from Breitbart News:
She said the security cameras were initially turned off, but that they turned them back on after a “short period of time.”
— Advertisement —
As Trump’s public information campaign about the FBI raid continues, the former president likely realizes he is still holding a major card in his hand.
It is unclear exactly what kind of FBI activity the Trumps were able to capture on camera.
Footage of the FBI rummaging around in his office and reportedly through his wife Melania Trump’s wardrobe would play endlessly on cable news as Justice Department continues struggling to defend the raid as essential to national security.
Click to expand...
 

Biden White House facilitated DOJ's criminal probe against Trump, scuttled privilege claims: memos​

"I have therefore decided not to honor the former President's 'protective' claim of privilege," acting National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall wrote Trump's team in May.

Link: https://justthenews.com/politics-po...ed-dojs-criminal-probe-against-trump?utm_medi

By John Solomon
Updated: August 23, 2022 - 8:26pm

Long before it professed no prior knowledge of the raid on Donald Trump's estate, the Biden White House worked directly with the Justice Department and National Archives to instigate the criminal probe into alleged mishandling of documents, allowing the FBI to review evidence retrieved from Mar-a-Lago this spring and eliminating the 45th president's claims to executive privilege, according to contemporaneous government documents reviewed by Just the News.
The memos show then-White House Deputy Counsel Jonathan Su was engaged in conversations with the FBI, DOJ and National Archives as early as April, shortly after 15 boxes of classified and other materials were voluntarily returned to the federal historical agency from Trump's Florida home.
By May, Su conveyed to the Archives that President Joe Biden would not object to waiving his predecessor's claims to executive privilege, a decision that opened the door for DOJ to get a grand jury to issue a subpoena compelling Trump to turn over any remaining materials he possessed from his presidency.
The machinations are summarized in several memos and emails exchanged between the various agencies in spring 2022, months before the FBI took the added unprecedented step of raiding Trump's Florida compound with a court-issued search warrant.
The most complete summary was contained in a lengthy letter dated May 10 that acting National Archivist Debra Steidel Wall sent Trump's lawyers summarizing the White House's involvement.
"On April 11, 2022, the White House Counsel's Office — affirming a request from the Department of Justice supported by an FBI letterhead memorandum — formally transmitted a request that NARA provide the FBI access to the 15 boxes for its review within seven days, with the possibility that the FBI might request copies of specific documents following its review of the boxes," Wall wrote Trump defense attorney Evan Corcoran.
That letter revealed Biden empowered the National Archives and Records Administration to waive any claims to executive privilege that Trump might assert to block DOJ from gaining access to the documents.
"The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here, President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President's purported 'protective assertion of executive privilege,'" Wall wrote. "... I have therefore decided not to honor the former President's 'protective' claim of privilege."
The memos provide the most definitive evidence to date of the current White House's effort to facilitate a criminal probe of the man Joe Biden beat in the 2020 election and may face again as a challenger in 2024. That involvement included eliminating one of the legal defenses Trump might use to fight the FBI over access to his documents.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee and the committee's likely chairman if the GOP win control of Congress in November, called the Biden White House's involvement and privilege waiver "amazing news" with implications for past and future presidents.
"Look, the left, they've been out to get President Trump because President Trump's a threat to the clique, to the swamp, to the bureaucracy, to the deep state," Jordan told the "Just the News, Not Noise" television show Tuesday night. "Whatever term you want to use. And they all know it.
"That's why they were out to get him before he was in office, and they set up the whole Russia collusion hoax. It's why they tried to get him while he was in office. And of course, obviously they continue to do so now that he's left. It's just never going to end."
Alan Dershowitz, the famed Harvard law professor emeritus and lifelong Democrat, reviewed some of the correspondence at Just the News' request. He said the Biden White House's eagerness to waive Trump's claims of privilege could have future implications for generations of presidents to come.
"I was very surprised," Dershowitz said after reading the text of Wall's letter. "The current president should not be able to waive the executive privilege of a predecessor, without the consent of the former president. Otherwise, [privilege] means nothing. What president will ever discuss anything in private if he knows the man who beat him can and will disclose it."
While some courts have upheld the notion of a successor president waiving privilege for a predecessor, Dershowitz said the matter remains to be decided definitively by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"The best thinking is that an incumbent president cannot waive the right of the previous president," he said in a phone interview with Just the News. "It would make a mockery of the whole notion of privilege."
In her letter, Wall told Corcoran the Biden administration believes a Watergate era ruling suggested Biden had the authority to waive Trump's privileges.
"The Supreme Court's decision in Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), strongly suggests that a former President may not successfully assert executive privilege 'against the very Executive Branch in whose name the privilege is invoked,'" she wrote. That ruling, however, was issued under an earlier predecessor law for presidential records and in the immediate aftermath of one of America's worst presidential scandals.
The correspondence reviewed by Just the News also provides a contemporaneous window into what the National Archives (NARA) found when it first got boxes of documents returned from Trump's compound in February 2022. Those boxes had been packed up by the General Services Administration as Trump was leaving the White House on Jan. 20, 2021.
"In its initial review of materials within those boxes, NARA identified items marked as classified national security information, up to the level of Top Secret and including Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Program materials," Wall wrote. "NARA informed the Department of Justice about that discovery, which prompted the Department to ask the President to request that NARA provide the FBI with access to the boxes at issue so that the FBI and others in the Intelligence Community could examine them."
The correspondence and emails show Corcoran had a phone conversation with Su about privilege claims in the spring, with Trump's lawyers raising concerns that some of the materials were subject to Trump's claims of executive privilege.
"We have requested the ability to review the documents," Corcoran wrote National Archives General Counsel Gary Stern on April 29, copying Su on the letter. "That review is necessary in order to ascertain whether any specific document is subject to privilege. We would respectfully request that you restrict access to the documents until we have had the opportunity to review the documents and to consult with President Donald J. Trump so that he may personally make any decision to assert a claim of constitutionally based privilege."
But a dozen days later, Wall informed Corcoran that she had the blessing of Biden to overrule those privilege claims and share all materials requested by the DOJ and FBI.
"The White House Counsel's Office acquiesced in an extension of the production date to April 29, and so advised NARA," she wrote. "In accord with that agreement, we had not yet provided the FBI with access to the records when we received your letter on April 29, and we have continued to refrain from providing such access to date.
"It has now been four weeks since we first informed you of our intent to provide the FBI access to the boxes so that it and others in the Intelligence Community can conduct their reviews. Notwithstanding the urgency conveyed by the Department of Justice and the reasonable extension afforded to the former President, your April 29 letter asks for additional time for you to review the materials in the boxes.
"Accordingly, I have consulted with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel to inform my 'determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege.' ... I have therefore decided not to honor the former President's 'protective' claim of privilege."
Within a couple of weeks of Wall's letter to Corocoran, the DOJ sent a grand jury subpoena to Trump's team demanding the return of any remaining national security documents, which precipitated a voluntary visit by the FBI to Mar-a-Lago on June 3, when agents picked a small amount of materials Trump's lawyers said were responsive to the subpoena
Two months later, the FBI escalated again, seeking a search warrant to raid the Trump estate on Aug. 8.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top