Serious, respected scientist warns: "all who were covid-vaxxed, even if only once, likely to die within 3-5 yrs," suckers

[Apollonian]

Renowned Scientist: All Covid-Vaxxed ‘Will Die in 3 to 5 Years’​

Frank BergmanMay 1, 2024 - 12:54 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-scientist-all-covid-vaxxed-will-die-3-5-years/

[vids at site link, above]

A world-renowned scientist and leading immunology expert has raised the alarm with an explosive warning to the public that everyone who has been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots “will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”
The alert was issued by Professor Dr. Dolores Cahill.
Prof. Cahill has over 25 years of expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, and automation.
The experience includes work on how proteins and antibodies can be used in biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery, diagnostics, and personalized medicine.
She is the Professor of Translational Science at Conway Institute at the University College Dublin’s (UCD) School of Medicine.

With her research group and collaborators, she has achieved key breakthroughs in developing and demonstrating applications of high throughput array technology in biological, diagnostics, and medical research.
Prof. Cahill pioneered this research at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany from 1996 to 2003 and holds several granted international patents in this vital field.
Since the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out in early 2021, Cahill has been sounding the alarm about the devastating impact they will have on public health.
Not only does Cahill think the shots are dangerous, but she warns that they will eventually kill everybody who has received one or more doses.

During an interview, Cahill explains how mRNA in the injections harms all recipients and acts like a ticking time bomb in the Covid-vaccinated.
After explaining how the shots impact human health, Cahill made this following chilling prediction:
“Everybody who has an mRNA injection will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”

WATCH: [see site link, above, top]

However, while the comments are already stomach-churning, Cahill issued this warning in 2021.
Videos of Cahill’s warnings have begun circulating on social media as many believe this prediction is now unfolding three years later in 2024.
Like many who spoke out against the mass vaccination agenda, Cahill was removed from all social media platforms and smeared as a “conspiracy theorist” by the corporate media.
It is only now that her comments have been able to circulate due to the free speech agenda of Elon Musk’s X platform.

FULL VIDEO:

Professor Cahill is not the only leading expert to issue this warning, however.
As Slay News reported, one of the world’s leading virologists has warned the public that a “massive tsunami” of “chaos” and “death” is about to decimate the global Covid mRNA-vaccinated population.
The grave warning was issued by Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a world-renowned Belgian virologist.

Dr. Bossche warns that a “huge, huge wave” of illness and deaths among those vaccinated for Covid is now “imminent.”
The top scientist says this “massive tsunami” will collapse hospitals and cause financial, economic, and social “chaos.”
“What I am predicting is a massive, massive tsunami” of illness and death among highly-vaccinated populations with compromised immune systems, Bossche said.
“You will see what will happen, for example, in the next coming weeks…is more and more cases of more serious long Covid…

“They will start to replace the surge of the cancers…now we have a more chronic phase.
“It will end with a hyper-acute phase, a huge, huge wave…
“I’ve been studying this now for four years.
“I know what I’m talking about,” Bossche asserted.
“The thing I want your audience to understand, what we will be facing in the hyper-acute Covid crisis that is imminent, is that we will have to build a completely new world…” Bossche continues.

“It is very very clear that when this starts, our hospitals will collapse.
“And that means the chaos in all kinds of layers of society — financial, economic, social, you name it — will be complete.”
“And that is what I’m very clearly predicting…
“It’s very strange for me to make such statements, but I’m not hiding it because I’m two hundred percent convinced that it will happen,” he warned.

“This will be something that will be reported in history for many many generations to come,” he noted.
LISTEN (The relevant part starts around the 47-minute mark):
Audio Player

READ MORE – 25 Years Wiped from Life Expectancy of Fully Vaxxed

 

[Apollonian]

THE CDC LIED; PEOPLE DIED​

Link: https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/85929/the-cdc-lied-people.html

Published: May 2, 2024

SOURCE: STEVE KIRSCH​

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY​

An Epoch Times story released today revealed that the CDC deliberately lied to the public about the safety of the COVID vaccines. When asked about the deaths, the CDC lied to the public and falsely claimed that they had no evidence that the COVID vaccines have killed anyone.
The CDC lied. People died.
The evidence is crystal clear that the COVID vaccines are causing massive damage to people’s hearts and brains.
In this article, I’ll show you the evidence for afib and aortic aneurysms which are two important side effects that are obviously caused by the COVID vaccine and, just like death, are being ignored by the CDC.

THE KEY PART OF THE STORY​

“U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials found evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines caused multiple deaths before claiming that there was no evidence linking the vaccines to any deaths, The Epoch Times has learned.
CDC employees worked to track down information on reported post-vaccination deaths and learned that myocarditis—or heart inflammation, a confirmed side effect of the vaccines—was listed on death certificates and in autopsies for some of the deaths, according to an internal file obtained by The Epoch Times.
…
Despite the findings, most of which were made by the end of 2021, the CDC claimed that it had seen no signs linking the Moderna and Pfizer messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines to any deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”
Wow. “Seen no signs.”
Are they blind?

IN OTHER WORDS… IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THE EVIDENCE, THEY SIMPLY CLAIM IT DOES NOT EXIST​

The CDC had evidence the vaccines were killing people but they convinced themselves that these were just coincidences and not related to the vaccine.
So, in the CDC’s view, when young healthy people simply drop dead unexpectedly in their sleep within 24 hours after getting the COVID shot, that would not be considered to be any evidence that the vaccine might have killed them.
It’s fair to say that their statements about not having any evidence were simply false and misleading.
They should have said “We have evidence that hundreds of people have died from the vaccine, but we don’t believe any of it” which would at least be more accurate.
I spoke to the Epoch Times reporter who wrote the story. He was never able to speak with anyone at the CDC live. It was all via email. These people are all afraid of a live interview.

THE DEATH OF THE SON OF A PROMINENT PHYSICIAN​

VAERS recently started an investigation into this death which was first reported to VAERS 3 years ago (and re-reported because the original never appeared in the system).
His father is a very prominent and capable physician at one of the top medical schools in the country. His father is 100% certain the COVID vaccine killed his son, but he’s not speaking out publicly about it.
I was on the phone with a VAERS investigator who was investigating this “high priority” report that was filed 3 years ago.
She admitted they are understaffed but “catching up.”
OK, so they’re basically 3 years behind in investigating the highest priority deaths to determine whether they were caused by a vaccine or not.
This particular death was a perfectly healthy 52-year man with no comorbidities who died in his sleep just 5 days after his first dose.
He got a first dose of Pfizer, felt horrible, had a heart attack on the day of the shot and was sicker than a dog after that. He died 5 days later from an aortic aneurysm.
From the VAERS report:
“The HCP explained that 3 months after his father got injured from the vaccine, the son of doctor 2, who was young and healthy, decided to get the vaccine despite his dad having cardiac issues and then he had a heart attack that day and died five days later.”
His father had afib right after his first shot. He had an ablation to fix the afib. He was urged to get a second shot and developed afib immediately after the second shot.
Do you see a pattern here? Shot—> afib, Shot —> afib.
The CDC doesn’t see a connection. They think this is just a coincidence.
Bottom line: This death was caused by the COVID vaccine, but the father and mother won’t speak publicly about it.

WHAT VAERS SAYS​

100% of the aortic aneurysm cases reported after a vaccine in the 30+ years history of VAERS were reported after the COVID vaccine. 100%!!!!!
But the CDC says the COVID vaccines do not cause aortic aneurysms; they only cause myocarditis in very rare causes and it’s mild.
Do you agree with the CDC? Here’s the data for all vaccines in VAERS over all time:

As far as afib, here are the numbers. Again, 100% of the afib reports in VAERS are associated with the COVID vaccine. Over 10,000 cases.
But the CDC says the COVID vaccines don’t cause afib!!!!
I’d love to ask them how they explain the VAERS data, but they never get back to me.

100% of all the afib cases in the full 30+ year history of VAERS are associated with the COVID vaccine, but the CDC says the COVID vaccines don’t cause afib.

IT’S IN THE PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE THAT THE COVID VACCINES KILL PEOPLE​

But the CDC only believes what it wants to believe. Who cares if it is so obvious that it’s even in the peer reviewed literature?
This paper points out that the constriction of brain blood vessels is a well known side effect caused by the COVID vaccine. In this case, the constriction was so severe it killed this person.
So there is no doubt that the COVID vaccine kills people. But the CDC will ignore the evidence and pretend they are unaware of this paper.

SUMMARY​

The CDC has plenty of evidence that the COVID vaccines are killing people and cause a variety of side effects including afib and aortic aneurysms.
They don’t want to believe any of it because their core mission is to promote the vaccines and not make the agency look bad by admitting they made a mistake that killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and disabled millions more.
Their mission is not to protect the health of the American people.
Lying to the American people about the safety of the vaccine is therefore consistent with their mission.
Don’t expect Congress to ever hold them accountable.

 

[Apollonian]

NIH official finally admits taxpayers funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan — after years of denials​

By Social Links for Josh Christenson
Published May 16, 2024, 3:11 p.m. ET

Link: https://nypost.com/2024/05/16/us-ne...-wuhan-four-years-after-covid-pandemic-began/

[vid at site link, above]

It’s about time!
At long last, National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak admitted to Congress Thursday that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the months and years before the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?”
“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”
9
National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak finally admitted to Congress that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China before the COVID-19 pandemic.Jack Gruber-USA TODAY

The response comes after more than four years of evasions from federal public health officials — including Tabak himself and former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci — about the controversial research practice that modifies viruses to make them more infectious.

Tabak added that “this is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.”
Dr. Bryce Nickels, a professor of genetics at Rutgers University and co-founder of the pandemic oversight group Biosafety Now, told The Post the exchange “was two people talking past each other.”
“Tabak was engaging in the usual obfuscation and semantic manipulation that is so frustrating and pointless,” Nickels said, adding that the NIH bigwig was resisting accountability for risky research that can create pathogens of pandemic potential.


Researchers working in a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2017.Feature China/Future Publishing via Getty Images
“Instead of addressing this directly, Tabak launched into a useless response about how ‘gain-of-function’ encompasses many types of experiments,” he added.
In July 2023, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) barred the Wuhan Institute of Virology from receiving federal grants for the next 10 years.
EcoHealth Alliance, whose mission statement declares it is “working to prevent pandemics,” had all of its grant funding pulled by HHS for the next three years on Tuesday.
9
Asked by Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) whether an NIH grant to the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance supported the gain-of-function experiments, Tabak said, “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”youtube/ GOP Oversight
EcoHealth Alliance president Dr. Peter Daszak, in a hearing earlier this month before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, testified that his organization “never has and did not do gain-of-function research, by definition.”
But that claim directly contradicted Daszak’s private correspondence, including a 2016 email in which he celebrated the end of an Obama administration pause on gain-of-function research.
The EcoHealth head was also called out in sworn testimony to the COVID panel by Dr. Ralph Baric, a leading coronavirologist who initiated the research himself and declared it was “absolutely” gain-of-function.
9
Former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly denied the US funded research that modifies viruses to make them more infectious.AP
In an October 2021 letter to Congress, Tabak had acknowledged NIH funded a “limited experiment” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that tested whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”
He did not describe it as gain-of-function research — but disclosed that EcoHealth “failed to report” the bat coronaviruses modified with SARS and MERS viruses had been made 10,000 times more infectious, in violation of its grant terms.
The NIH scrubbed its website of a longstanding definition for gain-of-function research the same day that the letter was sent.
9
In an October 2021 letter to Congress, Tabak revealed EcoHealth “failed to report” the bat coronaviruses modified with SARS and MERS viruses had been made 10,000 times more infectious, in violation of its NIH grant.Jack Gruber-USA TODAY
Tabak also noted in his October 2021 letter that the “sequences of the viruses are genetically very distant” from COVID-19 — but other grant proposals from EcoHealth have since drawn scrutiny for their genetic similarities.
Fauci has repeatedly denied that the Wuhan lab research involved gain-of-function experiments, clashing with Republicans in high-profile hearings and “playing semantics” with the term during a closed-door interview with the House COVID panel earlier this year.
“He needs to define his definition of gain-of-function research, because as I have through this process in the last three years, read many, many published articles about gain-of-function research, or creation of a chimera, this is a new one,” COVID subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said following Fauci’s grilling in January.
9
Fauci ignored The Post’s questions about gain-of-function research in Wuhan during two days of closed-door testimony with the House subcommittee in January.Getty Images for Haddad Media
The ex-NIAID head and White House medical adviser under President Biden was escorted by Capitol Police and his attorneys to and from the committee room for his two days of interviews — and repeatedly dodged The Post’s questions about gain-of-function research and pandemic lockdown restrictions.
In 2021, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held Fauci’s feet to the fire over the evasions in several hearings.
“The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Fauci declared that May.
9
In another House hearing the same month, then-NIH director Dr. Francis Collins testified that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing gain of function research.”AP
In another House hearing the same month, then-NIH director Dr. Francis Collins testified that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing gain-of-function research.”
“We are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved grant allowed,” Collins added cautiously at the time.
That ignorance about what experiments came about as a result of the NIH grants was underscored by Daszak during his COVID subcommittee hearing last week.
9
“He needs to define his definition of gain-of-function research,” COVID subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said following Fauci’s grilling in January.CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
The EcoHealth leader acknowledged he had not asked longtime collaborator and Wuhan Institute of Virology deputy director Shi Zhengli for any viral sequences since before the pandemic began.
In his own closed-door testimony to the House subcommittee released Thursday, Collins echoed Tabak’s comments but went further by saying there “is a generic description of gain-of-function which is utilized in scientific and public conversation, but is not appropriate to apply that to a circumstance where we’re talking about a potential pathogen.”
“We need to be highly cognizant of the risks of gain-of-function technology now that scientific capabilities exist for creating something in a lab that didn’t exist 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago,” Wenstrup told The Post following Thursday’s hearing.
“Drs. Fauci and Collins, over a decade ago, both conceded that there are risks associated with gain-of-function research.”
EcoHealth received more than half a million dollars for its work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology as part of a grant of more than $4 million to study the emergence of bat coronaviruses between 2014 and 2024.
9
The House subcommittee is still investigating whether COVID-19 leaked out of a lab in Wuhan, which has been described as the most likely cause of the pandemic by the FBI, US Energy Department, ex-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Robert Redfield and former Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe.Getty Images
That grant was revoked in 2020, reinstated in 2023 and finally suspended and proposed for debarment this week.
The House subcommittee is still investigating whether COVID-19 accidentally leaked out of a lab in Wuhan, which has been described as the most likely cause of the pandemic by the FBI, US Energy Department, ex-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Dr. Robert Redfield and former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.
Nickels also slammed Tabak Thursday for still claiming the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 originating in a “wild animal market in Wuhan.”

“It’s pure insanity to continue to delegate responsibly for risk/benefit analysis of research that poses an existential threat to humanity to the scientist that will perform the work and their institutions,” Nickels claimed.
“We just had a devastating pandemic likely caused by creation of a [Pathogen with Enhanced Pandemic Potential] in a lab, and yet scientists want the public to trust them that they can police themselves?” he balked. “That’s just total and complete nonsense.”
Fauci is scheduled to answer questions about the gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab and theories of the origin of the pandemic in a public subcommittee hearing set for June 3.