Now in Norway, risk of dying fm ..vaxx shot greater than covid disease itself.

Norway Reclassifies Covid-19 No More Dangerous Than Flu​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/09/norway-reclassifies-covid-19-no-more.html

Covid-19 is treated in the mass media as a very dangerous disease in the face of which mass vaccination and severe restrictions for the whole society are applauded despite few deaths beyond the risk groups.

But in Norway, it has now been decided to treat it like other respiratory diseases, such as influenza or the cold virus, because according to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health it is no longer more dangerous than these.
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health FHI has made the remarkable, but statistically supported, decision to classify Covid-19 as a respiratory disease that is as dangerous as the common flu. It is clarified that the pandemic is not over, but that it has entered a new phase where Covid-19 is now equated with a common respiratory disease, such as a flu or respiratory infection.
This is done, among other things, due to the mutations that the Coronavirus has undergone, which makes it less dangerous, together with increased natural and vaccination-induced immunity that has been achieved in Norwegian society.
Although the infection itself continues to circulate in the population, this does not mean an increase in hospital stays, which in itself means that the Coronavirus no longer creates a large burden on healthcare in Norway. This is because the vast majority of those at risk are protected. Those who are vaccinated also get severe symptoms and those who are not in the risk groups also usually only get ordinary mild cold symptoms. FHI thus makes the assessment that the Coronavirus now joins the ranks of other respiratory viruses such as the common cold and seasonal flu.
It is something positive and sends out signals that at least in Norway, at the moment, they consider themselves aware of the situation,” said Niklas Arnberg, professor of virology at Umeå University and chairman of the Pandemic Foundation to Aftonbladet.

More Contagious But Less Dangerous

The FHI believes that the pandemic itself is not over because it is still out in the world and is spreading at the same time as the proportion of people vaccinated worldwide is low. As long as it spreads outside the territories of rich countries, it will be a continuing pandemic, it is said.
With fewer in the high-risk groups who are in need of healthcare, the burden on healthcare decreases sharply.
The second factor is one that is well known, namely that viruses with very few exceptions over time on purely evolutionary grounds develop towards becoming more contagious but at the same time less lethal. Sars-CoV-2 has undergone thousands of mutations and different variants have replaced each other in the rate of spread and degree of infection, but which have continuously proved less and less deadly.
This spread also continues among vaccinated people as the degree of vaccine protection against this variant is lower than against previous variants, which also enables its continued spread, even in countries where the majority of the population has been vaccinated.
In the studies conducted by FHI, it has been found that both partially and fully vaccinated people who receive Covid-19 have a low risk of having to go to hospital for care, but that the same also applies to healthy people who do not belong to risk groups. In those who were partially vaccinated, it has been concluded that the degree of protection against the Delta variant is only 22 percent, which increases to 65 percent for those who received two doses of vaccine.
There are still low degrees of efficacy compared with the Alpha variant of the virus, where the degree of protection was instead 55 percent and 84 percent for those vaccinated. According to the latest statistics from FHI, 67 new patients have been admitted to hospital with Covid-19 as the main cause during week 37, which is a decrease from 95 cases the week before. But of the new cases in week 37, only 9 patients needed intensive care, a decrease from 22 from the previous week.
It is also believed that the risk of needing medical care increases for those who are completely unvaccinated, but this is otherwise dependent on the risk group you are in. Around 40 percent of those who needed to be admitted for care in Norway during the past week have, for example, been fully vaccinated but have then an overwhelming majority belonged to risk groups.
Around 5 percent have been partially vaccinated and around 55 percent of those admitted have not been vaccinated at all. A total of 11 people died with Covid-19 during week 37, a decrease from 13 deaths the previous week. The average age of those who died in week 37 was 80 years and thus in the risk group.
In Norway, 90 percent of the population over the age of 18 have received their first dose and 83 percent have received their second dose and are thus considered fully vaccinated.

Influenza Does Not Require Mass Vaccination

The significantly improved situation in Norway means that they choose to classify Covid-19 as a respiratory infection of the same degree of danger as influenza. This does not mean that it is seen as harmless, but rather that just as in the case of influenza, it is believed that it can be managed and that the risks for patients with a Covid-19 or influenza infection are comparable and that it is for people in the risk groups.
The total societal costs for virus-caused diseases can be tens of billions of kronor every year, without us having a pandemic,” Arnberg told Swedish daily Aftonbladet. He cited common colds and stomach ailments as causes for this.
Every year, between 300 000 and 1,5 million Swedes fall ill with the flu, but few still die, only between 700 and 2000 annually, with fairly large annual variations within this range. As in the case of Covid-19, it is in the risk groups that the overwhelming majority of deaths occur, but no mass vaccinations are carried out at the societal level despite this.
More children aged 10-19, for example, die of the common flu each year, between five and ten children, which is more than what died with Covid-19 in 2020 and 2021, as according to the National Board of Health and Welfare’s death register only four children who died with Covid-19 so far. In terms of this age group, the flu is more dangerous than Covid-19. This is interesting in itself, because in Norway, unlike Sweden, they have chosen not to vaccinate children under 12 years of age.

The Future Looks Bright

By the winter, it is suspected in Norway that the hospitals will not be burdened with patients who have fallen ill with Covid-19, but instead there will be a mixture of Covid-19, other respiratory infections and common flu.
I think we have reached the top this time. Then I think instead that we will get a winter wave that comes later. But we do not think it will be bigger than the healthcare system can handle,” Geir Bukholm told Verdens Gang.
According to FHI’s assessments, the infection is on the decline, fewer people become seriously ill, very few die and Norway’s assessment that Covid-19 is no longer more dangerous than a common flu looks increasingly correct.
 

Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine’s Effectiveness Falls Below 50 Percent After 5 Months: Study​

Link: https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_a...udy_4032448.html?utm_source=appan2028210?v=ul
By Katabella Roberts
Katabella Roberts is a reporter currently based in Turkey. She covers news and business for The Epoch Times, focusing primarily on the United States.

October 5, 2021 Updated: October 5, 2021


The effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine falls below 50 percent after five months, according to a new study published in The Lancet medical journal on Oct. 4.

The study (pdf), which was funded by Pfizer, aimed to evaluate the overall variant-specific effectiveness of the companies’ vaccine against CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus infections and COVID-19-related hospital admissions over time.

Researchers analyzed electronic health records of more than 3.4 million men and women who were members of the health care organization Kaiser Permanente Southern California between Dec. 14, 2020, and Aug. 8, and assessed the vaccine effectiveness up to six months after they were inoculated.

They found that the Pfizer vaccine was 88 percent effective in the first month after full vaccination, but dropped to 47 percent effectiveness after five months.

The vaccine was also found to be highly effective against the Delta variant, providing 93 percent effectiveness in the first month after full vaccination but declining to 53 percent after four months.

By comparison, effectiveness against other non-Delta variants was 97 percent after a month and declined to 67 percent after four to five months, according to the study.

Effectiveness against Delta-related hospital admission remained high at 93 percent for up to six months, the researchers said.

Researchers said that the reduction in effectiveness was likely because of waning immunity over the period of time since the individual was given the second shot as opposed to the Delta strain.

“Our results provide support for high effectiveness of BNT162b2 against hospital admissions up until around six months after being fully vaccinated, even in the face of widespread dissemination of the Delta variant,” the researchers wrote.

“Reduction in vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections over time is probably primarily due to waning immunity with time rather than the Delta variant escaping vaccine protection.”

“Our results reiterate in a real-world U.S. setting that vaccination with [the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine] remains an essential tool for preventing COVID-19, especially COVID-19-associated hospital admissions, caused by all current variants of concern,” they added.

The latest Pfizer-funded study comes one day after a separate BioRxiv study published on Oct. 4 that found that antibody levels generated by two shots of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine can undergo up to a 10-fold decrease seven months following the second vaccination.

The research, which is yet to be peer-reviewed, noted that the drop in antibody levels would compromise the body’s ability to defend itself against COVID-19 if an individual becomes infected.

The study focused on 56 healthy participants who had received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The participants’ blood was tested once after receiving the second vaccination and once again after six months.

Researchers suggested administering a third booster shot as a measure to improve vaccine efficacy.

Both studies reiterate findings from Pfizer and BioNTech that were released in July showing that vaccine effectiveness dropped from 96 percent to 84 percent over six months.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the most widely used in the United States. More than 226 million doses have been administered as of Sept. 30, compared with 151 million Moderna shots and 15 million of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.
 

SHOCKING: A World Health Organisation Database Lists 2,201,851 Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccine Including Birth Disorders​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/shocking-world-health-organisation.html

A database launched by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2015 details a worryingly long list of the 2201851 catalogued reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccine.
The database – VigiAccess – was shown in a video that was shared on social media and we can confirm that what is presented is true and accurate. VigiAccess lists all the reported adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccine and other vaccines. The WHO database is maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre in Sweden and is one of the largest global adverse event reporting systems.

Members of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring include:​

Full Member Countries (148):​

Afghanistan (2016)
Albania (2020)
Algeria (2021)
Andorra (2008)
Angola (2013)
Argentina (1994)
Armenia (2001)
Australia (1968)
Austria (1991)
Azerbaijan (2018)

Bangladesh (2014)
Barbados (2008)
Belarus (2006)
Belgium (1977)
Benin (2011)
Bhutan (2014)
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) (2013)
Bosnia and Herzegovina (2019)
Botswana (2009)
Brazil (2001)
Brunei Darussalam (2005)
Bulgaria (1975)
Burkina Faso (2010)

Cabo Verde (2012)
Cambodia (2012)
Cameroon (2010)
Canada (1968)
Chad (2018)
Chile (1996)
China (1998)
Colombia (2004)
Congo (2021)
Costa Rica (1991)
Côte d’Ivoire (2010)
Croatia (1992)
Cuba (1994)
Cyprus (2000)
Czechia (1992)

Democratic Republic of the Congo (2010)
Denmark (1971)
Dominican Republic (2020)

Ecuador (2017)
Egypt (2001)
El Salvador (2017)
Eritrea (2012)
Estonia (1998)
Eswatini (2015)
Ethiopia (2008)

Fiji (1999)
Finland (1974)
France (1986)
Gambia (2021)
Georgia (2018)
Germany (1968)
Ghana (2001)
Greece (1990)
Guatemala (2002)
Guinea (2013)

Honduras (2020)
Hungary (1990)

Iceland (1990)
India (1998)
Indonesia (1990)
Iran (Islamic Republic of) (1998)
Iraq (2010)
Ireland (1968)
Israel (1973)
Italy (1975)

Jamaica (2012)
Japan (1972)
Jordan (2002)

Kazakhstan (2008)
Kenya (2010)
Kuwait (2021)
Kyrgyzstan (2003)

Lao People’s Democratic Republic (2015)
Latvia (2002)
Lebanon (2021)
Liberia (2013)
Libya (2021)
Lithuania (2005)
Luxembourg (2020)

Madagascar (2009)
Malawi (2019)
Malaysia (1990)
Maldives (2016)
Mali (2011)
Malta (2004)
Mauritius (2014)
Mexico (1999)
Montenegro (2009)
Morocco (1992)
Mozambique (2005)

Namibia (2008)
Nepal (2006)
Netherlands (1968)
New Zealand (1968)
Nicaragua (2020)
Niger (2012)
Nigeria (2004)
North Macedonia (2000)
Norway (1971)
Oman (1995)

Pakistan (2018)
Panama (2016)
Papua New Guinea (2018)
Paraguay (2018)
Peru (2002)
Philippines (1995)
Poland (1972)
Portugal (1993)

Republic of Korea (1992)
Republic of Moldova (2003)
Romania (1976)
Russian Federation (1998)
Rwanda (2013)

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (2020)
Saudi Arabia (2009)
Senegal (2009)
Serbia (2000)
Sierra Leone (2008)
Singapore (1993)
Slovakia (1993)
Slovenia (2010)
South Africa (1992)
Spain (1984)
Sri Lanka (2000)
Sudan (2008)
Suriname (2007)
Sweden (1968)
Switzerland (1991)
Syrian Arab Republic (2018)

Thailand (1984)
Togo (2007)
Tunisia (1993)
Turkey (1987)

Uganda (2007)
Ukraine (2002)
United Arab Emirates (2013)
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1968)
United Republic of Tanzania (1993)
United States of America (1968)
Uruguay (2001)
Uzbekistan (2006)

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) (1995)
Viet Nam (1999)

Zambia (2010)
Zimbabwe (1998)
Associate members (23)
WHO Member States
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Bahrain
Belize
Burundi
Dominica
Grenada
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti

Mongolia
Myanmar
Qatar
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
South Sudan

Tajikistan
Timor-Leste

Yemen
Territories/Areas
Anguilla
British Virgin Islands
Montserrat
Zanzibar
A quick search of “Covid-19 vaccine” presents a sectioned list, listing reactions ranging from cardiac disorders to congenital and genetic disorders. In total, 2,201,857 adverse reactions have been reported to the database.
vigi1.jpg

According to the database, the Covid-19 vaccine has been linked to 108468 cardiac disorders including 9368 cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), 25518 cases of tachycardia (when the heart rate increases to over 100 bpm) and 6112 reports of pericarditis (inflammation of the protective sac around the heart).
Additionally, the database state that there have been 1191 congenital (birth) disorders linked to the Covid-19. The highest number of reports fall under a factor V Leiden mutation, a genetic disorder that makes it more likely for an individual to develop a blood clot at some point during life. If a clot develops, it is likely to present in the form of deep venous thrombosis or a pulmonary embolism.
For there to be continental effects listed, this suggests that the Covid-19 vaccine does indeed affect fertility and the development of a foetus in the womb if the mother receives a jab when pregnant. This contradicts what the WHO and other health authorities have stated throughout the rollout of the jab, as they have actively encouraged pregnant women to get vaccinated. In the UK, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has advised that women should be offered Covid-19 vaccines, stating that they are “effective and have a good safety profile.”
However, it is unknown what the effects of the spike proteins in the vaccine may have on pregnant women and their unborn children, considering that these jabs have not faced significant safety testing. Additionally, despite health authorities promising that the vaccine remains in the shoulder once injected, a Japanese Pfizer bio-distribution study found high levels of lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine accumulated in different parts of the body including in the uterus, ovaries and lymph nodes. Therefore, we have to wonder what the short term – and long term – consequences of these vaccine ingredients accumulating in organs around the body could be.
Just some of the other reported birth disorders include 64 cases of an atrial septal defect (hole in the heart) and 49 reports of congenital heart disease.
The database offers an insight into the geographical location of the reports, age group distribution and sex distribution. Europe is responsible for 50 percent of cases listed in the database, whilst 38 percent are from the American continent. 6% of reports are from Asia and 3% are from the African and Oceania continents respectively
vigi5.jpg

It appears as though the Covid-19 vaccine does not discriminate by age or sex, as it has had an effect on all age groups and both genders. The highest affected age group are those aged 18-44 years old, with 39 percent of reactions being linked to those within this group. The second highest group affected by the jab are those aged 45-64 years, with 31 percent of cases linked to this category. Shockingly, there have been 301 adverse events reported in children aged 0-27 days and an additional 1327 reactions reported within children aged 28 days to 23 months.
However, 12 percent of reactions listed in VigiAccess are for individuals where their age is not known.
vigi4.jpg

Regarding gender, the Covid-19 vaccine appears to affect females more than men, with 69 percent of reactions linked to women and 30 percent affecting men. However, 1 percent (28440) fall into reports where the gender is unknown.
vigi3.jpg

What is eye-opening is the reports of adverse reactions from the vaccine per year, which shows that 100 percent of reports were made in 2021, or an eye-watering 2199476 adverse events.
vigi2.jpg

It seems that the Covid-19 vaccine will only continue to cause a shocking amount of adverse reactions to recipients around the world. Whilst many of these will take place within the short term, we have to wonder what the long term consequences of these rushed vaccines will be.
 

Virus Dangers vs. Vaccine Dangers - Fact Sheet​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/virus-dangers-vs-vaccine-dangers-fact.html

Virus dangers
1. Blood Clots— causing organ damage
2. Inflammation— causing organ damage
Vaccine dangers
1. Blood clots— causing organ damage
2. Inflammation— causing organ damage

3. Bell’s Palsy, Guillain barre syndrome, paralysis, neuropathy, Parkinson’s, death, myocarditis, pericarditis, etc.
4. Shedding— FDA knew about it in 2015
5. No long-term studies
6. No short-term studies either —control group was vaccinated
7. CDC Vaers data shows 750,000 adverse reactions to date and is undercounted by their own admission
8. Cominarty was approved without proper FDA procedures and is not even available in U.S.
Vaccine efficacy
1. Only 15% effectiveat preventing transmission or hospitalization after 7 months
2. Booster is the same medication
3. Fully vaccinated people still spread and catch Covid
4. Vaccine seems to interfere with natural immunity after recovery from covid virus and could be dangerous
 

ERs Are OVERRUN With People Suffering From “Sudden Cardiac Arrest”​

Mac Slavo
November 3rd, 2021
SHTFplan.com

Link: https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-n...h-people-suffering-from-sudden-cardiac-arrest


hospital-e1511879621378-300x154.jpg


Emergency rooms across the United States are filling up with people suffering from major health issues. Unlike during the height of the “pandemic” when hospitals were empty and devoid of any human life.

New York’s COVID-19 Field Hospital Dismantled After Treating ZERO Patients

Woman BANNED From ALL HOSPITALS In The UK For Proving Hospitals Are EMPTY

The scene being painted is in stark contrast to where emergency departments were at the start of the pandemic. Except for initial hot spots like New York City, in spring 2020 many ERs across the country were often eerily empty. And even in New York City, despite KHN‘s claims, the hospitals were empty.

COVID isn’t overwhelming the health system either. Patients are showing up to the ER sicker than before the pandemic, their diseases more advanced and in need of more complicated care. The mainstream media is blaming it on people putting off care during the hoax scamdemic to avoid getting the common cold they relabeled COVID-19.

Could it be something else though? Could it be:

More COIVD-19 Vax Deaths: Think They’ll Blame This On COVID-21?

A report by NRP even stated that the problem isn’t COVID patients. Bloomberg Quint has reported that even though 80% of Coloradoans have been “vaccinated,” the hospitals are still overrun. But the governor claims it’s those pesky “unvaccinated” people filling up the hospitals.

Colorado’s governor Jared Polis said that the only way to relive the hospitals, is of course, for the 20% who continue to refuse the shots to take them. operative, if everybody was vaccinated. “This is particularly tragic now because it’s essentially entirely preventable,” Polis said. The state may soon ask the Federal Emergency Management Agency to augment stretched hospital staffing, he said, in addition to employing the crisis standards that set guidelines for rationing care, he said. Colorado has one of the highest vaccination rates in the country as the governor begins to talk of rationing care.

Is this just a coincidence?
 

Norway Study Finds ZERO Vaccine Effectiveness Against Death for Covid Hospital Patients​


Link: https://dailysceptic.org/2021/11/14...ss-against-death-for-covid-hospital-patients/
bryggen_wharf_bergen_hordaland_fjord_norway_photo_florian_olbrechts_34ad36ea-f7bc-4150-b48b-af2c2c14628f-1024x683.jpg



A new pre-print study from Norway looking at differences in outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated hospital patients has found that being vaccinated makes zero difference to the risk of dying once hospitalised for COVID-19.
“There was no difference in the adjusted odds of in-hospital death between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in any age group,” the researchers write. They also observed no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated in the length of hospital stay for patients not admitted to ICU. These findings are adjusted for age and other risk factors so are not simply due to the vaccinated being older or at higher risk (though, as always, the validity of the adjustments may be questioned). The findings also only include patients admitted primarily due to Covid, so aren’t confounded by patients admitted for other reasons who also tested positive at some point.
The researchers did however find that vaccinated patients aged 18-79 had “43% lower odds of ICU admission” and an estimated 26% shorter hospital stay than unvaccinated patients.
It is curious that vaccinated patients were 43% less likely to need ICU but no less likely to die. Did the antibodies from the vaccines just mean that those who were going to fight it off did so a bit more quickly and easily, but the vaccine antibodies weren’t actually able to save anyone who wasn’t going to survive anyway? That appears to be the researchers’ conclusion:
Our results suggest that once hospitalised the risk of death among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in Norway is similar. However, for survivors the disease trajectory is milder in vaccinated patients, with reduced need for hospital care and organ support.

The study didn’t examine what difference vaccination might make to the risk of being admitted to hospital in the first place, as it was a hospital-based study. This means vaccination may reduce one’s risk of needing to go to hospital (and thus the overall risk of death), even if it doesn’t reduce the risk of dying once admitted.
The study covered all patients in Norway admitted to hospital primarily due to Covid between February 1st and September 30th 2021, though made various exclusions (including 154 who tested positive within 21 days of their first dose, which is a shame as more analysis needs to be done on such cases). It included 2,361 patients, 70 of whom (3%) were partially vaccinated and 183 (8%) of whom were fully vaccinated. Almost all had the Pfizer vaccine. Over the study period, 421 of the patients (18%) had been admitted to ICU. At the end of the study period 18 patients (0.8%) were still in hospital, while of the 2,343 patients discharged, 107 died in hospital (4.6%).
The percentage vaccinated seems at first glance to be very low at 8%, particularly as the study states that 84% of Norwegian adults were double vaccinated by the end of September. However, the figure makes more sense when you look at when Covid hospital admissions in Norway occurred during the study period: of the 2,775 total Covid hospital admissions during the period, 1,742 (63%) occurred before May 2nd, at which point just 7% of Norwegian adults were vaccinated.
coronavirus-data-explorer-2021-11-13T224634.011-1024x723.png
coronavirus-data-explorer-2021-11-13T231528.694-1024x723.png

In fact, the study tells us when people were admitted by vaccination status, as per the following table.
Norway-month-table2-1024x537.jpg

Note that 58% of the double vaccinated were admitted just in September, and 82% once you add August in as well, leaving only 18% admitted prior to the Delta surge. Is there a waning effect at work, then? Perhaps, though the authors don’t suggest so. In fact, they decline to include a chart showing how the risk of in-hospital death changed over time, explaining: “Date of admission was not associated with death in hospital in our multivariable model.” This suggests the trend was flat, rather than declining.
The study is unusual in finding zero vaccine effectiveness against in-hospital death for the whole period of the vaccination programme. A recent study in neighbouring Sweden found vaccine effectiveness against severe disease declining over the course of seven months to be low, zero or even negative in risk groups such as men, older frail people and people with comorbidities (see below; there were no separate findings on death). But this is one of the first major studies to find an important measure of vaccine effectiveness – in-hospital mortality – to be negligible overall.
image-14-1024x745.png
From the Swedish study by Nordström et al.
It’s probably worth recalling at this point that Norway is an outlier generally in the pandemic so far, with one of Europe’s lowest Covid death rates and, incredibly, zero excess mortality during the pandemic.
coronavirus-data-explorer-2021-11-14T001831.539-1024x723.png

Does this affect how generalisable the results of the study are to other countries?
Similarly, Sweden is also unusual in having been left largely unscathed so far by the Delta variant that has caused new surges in most countries.
coronavirus-data-explorer-2021-11-14T003248.520-1024x723.png

Qatar, too – another country where a recent study has found sharply declining vaccine effectiveness against infection – has seen very little impact from Covid in 2021. In this case the study found effectiveness against serious disease generally held up, though less so among those over 60.
Is there some connection between this low impact of Covid in 2021 in these countries and the vaccine effectiveness results showing declining or zero efficacy against serious disease and death? Something worth looking into, I’d suggest.
 
Back
Top