Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for kikes"

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for kikes"

Biden Praises Jews, Goes Too Far, Accidentally Thrills Anti-Semites

Link: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/05/biden-praises-jews-goes-too-far.html

By Jonathan Chait

What? What'd I say?


Joe Biden spoke last night in honor of Jewish American Heritage Month. Biden has long, deep ties to the Jewish community — Obama actually picked him in 2008 in part to reassure skittish Jewish Democrats. Biden indeed offered fulsome, heartfelt praise in his remarks, before wandering into highly uncomfortable terrain and delivering a speech that is likely to be quoted by anti-Semites for years and decades to come. (It’s already the subject of excited discussion among the white supremacist community.)

Biden’s remarks were not anti-Semitic. They were very, very philo-Semitic. The thrust of his largely unscripted monologue is that Jews have contributed enormously to the United States. That’s obviously a standard spiel for praising any ethnic group, but Biden took care to emphasize that Jews have not just contributed their share to the United States, but far more:



The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized influence per capita as all of you standing before you, and all of those who went before me and all of those who went before you …

You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates …

I think you, as usual, underestimate the impact of Jewish heritage. I really mean that. I think you vastly underestimate the impact you’ve had on the development of this nation.


It’s obviously true that Jews have flourished in the United States and, as Biden says, have achieved massively disproportionate representation in fields like science, culture, politics, academia, and so on.


Jews regard this fact with a mixture of pride and neurosis. The neurosis is a fear that our success will be seen as a kind of invidious control, that the broader society will at some point say, no, you have too much. Ivy League schools in the last century imposed first overt quotas, and then more subtle geographic and “character”-based admissions standards, precisely to suppress the disproportionate Jewish share of their student body. The first generation of Hollywood moguls lived in terror that they would be seen as using their control of film to impose a particular Jewish slant upon the culture and labored endlessly to dispel any such suspicions.


It’s also true that, while Jewish opinions run the ideological gamut, they have clustered heavily on the left end of the political spectrum. When you combine that fact with the fact of disproportionate Jewish representation in politics and culture, you have a weirdly shared belief among philo-Semites and anti-Semites. As Biden proceeds to laud Jewish contributions to American politics, you can see the audience go from kvelling to shvitzing:



“The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements.

“You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” …

“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”

“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.

“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good.”


Biden’s intentions here are obviously as friendly as can be, but the execution is awkward. The civil rights movement today is so widely sanctified that mentioning the disproportionate Jewish role in it is in the same category as mentioning Einstein, Jonas Salk, and so on — look at all these wonderful things the Jews have helped bring us. Because Biden is liberal, it feels natural to segue into the Jewish role in the gay civil rights movement. (And I share his belief that popular culture has played an enormous and underappreciated role in promoting gay civil rights, among other liberal causes.)


Also, and this is a small thing, when you’re pulling numbers completely out of your ass, you should probably round them off to the tens digit rather than the fives. (Jews are 85 percent responsible for changing cultural attitudes toward gays? Ninety percent felt too high, 80 percent not high enough?)


The main problem here is that gay rights, unlike black civil rights, are politically controversial at the moment. Biden may find it “all to the good” that Jews have used their influence over popular culture to change societal attitudes toward homosexuality, but lots of people don’t find it good at all.
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Biden says Jewish ‘influence’ behind American cultural politics is ‘immense… immense’

http://mondoweiss.net/2013/05/influence-cultural-politics.html

by Philip Weiss on May 22, 2013 45


Joe Biden gave a speech to a Jewish group Tuesday night at which he said that the Jewish influence "behind" American culture is "immense." Praising a Jewish audience, he spoke of the prominent roles Jews had played in transforming American attitudes toward civil rights, feminism, and gay rights. The loquacious veep struck a high-water mark in philosemitism:

You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates. So many notions that are embraced by this nation that particularly emanate from over 5,000 years of Jewish history, tradition and culture: independence, individualism, fairness, decency, justice, charity.

The speech, which is up at Politico, had a political dimension: it was delivered at a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee. More from Jennifer Epstein's coverage:

“You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people.”

“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”

“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.

“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said.

Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. “You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of … rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

“Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us, us, me – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact," he said.
It's been picked up by the Times of Israel and Haaretz, the latter saying that Biden praised Jewish leaders for helping change American attitudes about gay marriage.

Writes Bruce Wolman:

Guess who is running for President? This is about the worst pandering I've ever seen. Gays didn't drive gay marriage, Jews in Hollywood and on the internet did. Is Joe sacrificing the Orthodox vote?

Of course, some of those Jews are gay themselves. I tend to agree somewhat with the vice president: Jewish cultural/political influence has been staggering (and matriarchal culture suited us to play an important role in the women's movement). And Biden has opened a door, even with his use of the prepositional phrase "behind all that." Behind is about quiet influence.

And if we're so influential, doesn't that give people the right to discuss that influence-- say in the instance of the lobby, the Jewish marriage to Zionism and the effect of that collision on US policy in the Middle East? Of course. (It also opens the door on Jewish exceptionalism, certainly a core belief of my upbringing....)
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Biden closes convention the way he launched his campaign: Repudiating anti-Semitism

By Ron Kampeas August 21, 2020 10:13 am

Link: https://www.jta.org/2020/08/21/poli...unched-his-campaign-repudiating-anti-semitism

Joe Biden accepts the Democratic Party nomination for president during the last day of the Democratic National Convention at the Chase Center in Wilmington, Del., Aug. 20, 2020. (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)

WASHINGTON (JTA) — Joe Biden closed the Democratic National Convention the way he launched his campaign in April of last year: By invoking what he depicted as President Donald Trump’s callousness to racism and anti-Semitism.

Biden, speaking late Thursday night to the convention made virtual because of the coronavirus pandemic, recalled the deadly 2017 neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia.

“Remember seeing those neo-Nazis and Klansmen and white supremacists come in in a field with lighted torches veins bulging spewing the same anti-Semitic bile heard across Europe in the 30s,” he said to viewers. “Remember what the president said when asked, he said there were quote, very fine people on both sides. It was a wake-up call for us as a country. And for me, a call to action. At that moment I knew I’d have to run.”

Trump, speaking in 2017 days after one of the neo-Nazi marchers killed one counterprotester and wounded others by driving his car into a group of people, said there were “very fine people” in both opposing camps of the rally. In the same remarks he also condemned neo-Nazis and white supremacists, but critics saw his comments as condoning the protesters’ racist message.

Biden launched his campaign in April 2019 in a video with footage from Charlottesville, saying Trump spurred the bigotry that fueled the violence. Now that he is the nominee, the message has permeated the party machine, and it was one of Biden’s first references in his acceptance speech Thursday night.

“We can choose a path to becoming angry, less hopeful more divided, a path of shadow and suspicion, or, or we can choose a different path and together, take this chance to heal to reform to unite a path of hope and light,” Biden said.

Multiple other convention speakers also invoked Charlottesville.

“We are in a battle for the soul of our nation,” Nikki Fried, Florida’s Jewish agricultural commissioner said Tuesday evening, the second night of the convention, in an opening montage of state-level Democratic officials. The “battle for the soul” line is one that Biden has used repeatedly.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Michelle Obama and others helped make what they said was Trump’s bigotry the main theme of the opening night of the convention. Cuomo explicitly invoked anti-Semitism as a threat.

“Over these past few years, America’s body politic has been weakened,” Cuomo said. “The divisions have been growing deeper: the anti-Semitism; the anti-Latino, the anti-immigrant fervor; the racism in Charlottesville, where the KKK didn’t even bother to wear their hoods.”

The theme featured large in multiple Jewish events around the convention, including at a meeting Tuesday of “Jewish Americans for Biden,” a group convened by Matt Nosanchuk, the Democratic National Committee’s Jewish outreach director.

Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, who is Jewish, referred to Trump’s equivocations after the violence in Charlottesville.

“We were not surprised to see the white supremacy or anti-Semites here in America, but we were shocked to see that the President of the United States gave credibility to white supremacy, to the anti-Semites,” he said. “It was not an isolated example. He’s done that over and over again. There’s a direct correlation between the president giving rise to nationalism, and the rise of anti-Semitism.”

Biden has said in a campaign message to the Jewish community posted on his website that he would restore funding, cut by Trump, that tracks domestic extremism, prioritize the prosecution of hate crimes and “Lead a comprehensive approach to battling anti-Semitism that takes seriously both the violence that accompanies it and the hateful and dangerous lies that underlie it.”
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Zionists ultimate winner of US 2020 election, analyst suggests

Monday, 24 August 2020 11:14 PM [ Last Update: Tuesday, 25 August 2020 1:02 AM ]

Link: https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2020/08/24/632537/US-2020-election-No-matter-who-wins-Zionists-win-

Vice President Mike Pence speaks during the first day of the Republican National Convention on August 24, 2020, in Charlotte, North Carolina. (AFP photo)

Zionists in control of the United States are the ultimate winners of the US 2020 presidential election regardless of who wins: Donald Trump or Joe Biden, an analyst says.

In his interview with Press TV on Monday, former US Senate candidate Mark Dankof further predicted that the Republican president will be reelected despite polls demonstrating otherwise.

"The Zionist entity controls the candidates and both major political parties. The relationship of Donald Trump and Mike Pence and the Zionist entity is very clear. It's also quite obvious that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's choice to be the democratic chicken," he said. "The end result is going to be a landslide victory for Donald Trump with all of the problems that await this country, regardless of who is elected."

Washington is full of Zionists whose loyalty is not to US, but to Israel

The US government is full of Zionists who have great influence especially in the media, and they love anything that will help Israel at the expense of any other country, J. Michael Springmann says.

The political commentator also touched upon the "rigged" nature of the US elections, further predicting a tough battle ahead of the November election.

"The Zionists win regardless of who wins this election, but in regard to many domestic issues, Donald Trump will carry the day. His campaign will begin to go after Biden and Harris again," noted the analyst, further pointing to "these endless Zionist wars that either party will continue with these candidates, regardless of the outcome of the election."

The San Antonio-based analyst then blamed liberals for riots and continuation of violence in cities "almost exclusively run by Democrats."

Right wing groups and Black Lives Matter counter-protesters clash in Portland, Oregon, using bear mace and fireworks against each other before federal police arrive to clear them out.

"This violence is almost exclusively occurring, courtesy of the far left in this country, the Marxist and so-called progressive wings, the Democratic Party, Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA and so forth are behind this mass violence in all of these American cities," said the commentator.

After the murder of George Floyd by a white police officer, the US has been gripped with protests -- in some cases violent -- against racial inequality and police brutality.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.ir

www.presstv.co.uk

www.presstv.tv
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Commentary upon the gross sucking-up to kikes, even against law, using US gov. props to enhance, promote, and dignify

 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Do u begin to getting the picture, u stupid puke?--Jews own both parties, u brainless, ignorant, moronic scum--all the rioting, and everything is totally choreographed, staged, managed to manipulate u scummy filth, called "people." But u're too busy pretending, like children, that u're "good," and u'll go along, dumb scum.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kamala Harris pledges unconditional support for Israel

Link: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/kamala-harris-pledges-unconditional-support-israel

Joe Biden's running mate says military assistance will not be linked to 'any political decision' that Israeli government makes

'I pledge to you, the Biden-Harris administration will sustain our unbreakable commitment to Israel's security,' Harris said (AFP)

By Ali Harb in Washington
Published date: 27 August 2020 17:52 UTC | Last update: 4 sec ago

Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris reiterated that Joe Biden will not impose any conditions on US aid to Israel, saying that assistance would not be linked to "any political decision" made by the Israeli government.

Her remarks, about eight weeks before the election, come at a time when the right-wing government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is still considering annexing large parts of the occupied West Bank.

"Joe has made it clear he will not tie security assistance to any political decisions that Israel makes, and I couldn't agree more," Harris told a virtual fundraiser with Jewish-American voters on Wednesday.

That California senator went on to promote Biden's "unwavering support" for Israel and his role in securing military assistance for the Israeli government when he served as Barack Obama's vice president.

"I pledge to you the Biden-Harris administration will sustain our unbreakable commitment to Israel's security, including the unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation pioneered during the Obama-Biden administration and the guarantee that Israel will always maintain its qualitative military edge," Harris said.

Sidelining Palestinians

Israel receives about $3.8bn in US military aid annually. Before leaving office in 2016, Obama signed a memorandum of understanding that ensures $38bn of assistance to Israel spread over 10 years.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden aides apologise privately over attack on Linda Sarsour
Read More »

During the Democratic primaries, Senator Bernie Sanders proposed imposing human rights conditions on the military aid to Israel - an idea that Biden promptly rejected.

Harris's remarks completely ruling out using military aid as leverage to advance US policy, including Biden's own opposition to settlement expansion and annexation - which he said would choke off chances of peace - add to the frustration of Palestinian rights advocates with the Democratic campaign.

"Although Palestinian and Arab Americans in the US understand as well as anyone else the historical importance of this election, the Democratic Party mainstream makes it supremely difficult to #VoteBlueNoMatterWho," Hatem Abudayyeh, co-founder of the US Palestinian Community Network (USPCN), told MEE in statement.

"Trump is clearly the worst human being and leader this country has seen in modern times, but when you dig deep on the policy level, you realize that Harris and Biden are the right wing of the Democratic Party - as it relates to annexation and other crimes against Palestinians, and health care and racial justice right here at home."

Iran deal

Asked about Biden's stated plan to return to the Iran nuclear deal, Harris vowed that a Democratic administration would not allow the Islamic Republic to obtain a nuclear weapon.

Pro-Israel groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), had ferociously opposed the 2015 multilateral nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Some hawkish Democrats, including the outgoing chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Eliot Engel, had also pushed against the deal. In 2015, Netanyahu addressed Congress without an invitation from the White House, and bashed the JCPOA in a major breach of diplomatic protocol.

Kamala Harris: How America's reacting to Biden's announcement
Read More »

The deal signed by several leading world powers saw Tehran scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for lifting sanctions against its economy.

As President Donald Trump nixed the agreement in May 2018, the nuclear deal gained popularity in the Democratic Party, even among some of its early critics.

On Wednesday, Harris defended the deal, while also committing to Israel's security.

"We will continue to ensure that Israel has the unbreakable support of the United States," Harris said. "Joe Biden actually took historic steps as vice president to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The Obama-Biden administration imposed what were described as crippling multilateral sanctions which brought Iran to negotiations, which paved the way for the JCPOA and prevented a nuclear-armed Iran."

She added that the nuclear agreement had "blocked Iran's pathways to a nuclear weapon", and slammed Trump for pulling out of the deal without an alternative.
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Kamala Harris tells Jewish supporters aid to Israel will not be conditional in a Biden administration

August 26, 2020 6:18 pm

Link: https://www.jta.org/quick-reads

Sen. Kamala Harris waves to supporters with her husband, Douglas Emhoff and her niece, Amara Ajagu, 2, during her presidential campaign launch rally in Oakland, Jan. 27, 2019. (Mason Trinca/Getty Images)

(JTA) — Kamala Harris, the California senator who is the Democratic vice presidential nominee, told Jewish supporters that Joe Biden, the presidential nominee, would not place any conditions on US aid to Israel.

“Joe has made it clear he will not tie security assistance to any political decisions that Israel makes and I couldn’t agree more,” Harris said Wednesday in a call arranged by the Biden campaign for Jewish donors. “The Biden Harris administration will sustain our unbreakable commitment to Israel’s security, including the unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation pioneered during the Obama-Biden administration and the guarantee that Israel will always maintain its qualitative military edge.”

The question about conditioning assistance came after a primary season in which a number of Democratic candidates for the nomination said they were prepared to condition aid, which would represent a major change in US policy. A number of these, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg, are now advising Biden.

Harris, who spoke via Zoom to the donors alongside her Jewish husband Douglas Emhoff, also repeated a pledge Biden has made not just to reenter the Iran nuclear deal, but also to improve it.

She faulted President Donald Trump for exiting the deal, which she said accelerated Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon, but she acknowledged the merit of some of Trump’s objections with the deal: that it allowed nuclear restrictions to lapse too soon, and that it did not address Iran’s militarism and regional adventurism.

“Our administration will hold Iran’s government accountable and rejoin a diplomatic agreement if Iran comes back into compliance,” she said. “And we will work with our allies, of course, to strengthen and extend the Iran deal and push back against Iran’s other destabilizing actions.”

Emhoff jokingly described his Jewish upbringing, recalling with a cringe the “brown velour suit” he wore for his bar mitzvah and noting that he had won an athletics award at camp.

He also sounded one of the main themes of the Biden campaign, calling out the leeway that he and others say Trump has given to white supremacists. “We need more than ever reassurance that our political leaders have our back,” Emhoff said. “They have a comprehensive plan to tackle the violence that stems from anti-Semitism and the hateful and dangerous lies that drive it.”
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

The Leahy Laws: Why Biden’s Promise to Israel Is Illegal

by Zarefah Baroud/ Posted on October 02, 2020

Link: https://original.antiwar.com/Zarefa...laws-why-bidens-promise-to-israel-is-illegal/

While co-hosting an interview on the Palestine Chronicle, I asked Dr. Richard Falk, former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, about his thoughts on Kamala Harris’ promise to maintain unconditional aid to Israel.

"I am disappointed of course by the Harris-Biden positions on Israel. I would have hoped for something closer to what Bernie Sanders was saying as a way of shifting the policies closer to what I think a majority of American people would support and want." Dr. Falk stated. "Again, it illustrates this disparity between the will of the people and the will of the governing elites…I don’t think we can be very hopeful. Possibly on the annexation issue…but I am not very optimistic that there will be any changes."

Once again, this presidential election cycle has given American voters once again a choice: the lesser of two evils.

Yet, in this election, it is particularly difficult to differ between the two candidates, especially their attitudes towards the Israeli occupation and American responsibilities towards the former, being their military’s largest sponsor.

Notably, the "progressive" Biden does not have a discourse which is more developed than his conservative opponent. In July, he ordered the removal of any reference to the "Israeli occupation" from his campaign platform in July, in contradiction with international recognition of Israel as a belligerent occupation.

Progressive Americans organized against the Trump administration for his frequent violations of constitutional law and lack of human rights standards, domestically and internationally.

Many have missed that Biden has already committed to campaign promises which guarantee not only a lack of regard for international law, but guarantee his violations of U.S. law.

Tony Blinken, Joe Biden’s senior advisor, stated: "He [Biden] would not tie military assistance to Israel to any political decisions that it makes. Period. Full stop. He said it; he’s committed to it."

Of course, Kamala Harris has reaffirmed the sentiments communicated by Blinken. Harris stated in an virtual event on August 26th: "Joe (Biden) has made it clear he will not tie security assistance to any political decisions that Israel makes, and I couldn’t agree more,"

These various statements should have struck many as more problematic than they did. After all, they are pledging to break the law for Israel.

In 1998, the first of what are known as the Leahy Laws were established by Vermont Senator, Patrick Leahy. The first institution of which resides in the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) of 1961 in Section 620M, the second of which resides in the Department of Defense appropriations bill/the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014. Essentially, the law states that foreign military assistance must be suspended or discontinued if there exists credible information that the recipient foreign security force unit has committed a gross human rights violation. A "gross human rights violation" is defined by the FAA as:

"Cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment or punishment; prolonged detention without charges and trial; causing the disappearance of persons by the abduction and clandestine detention of those persons; and other flagrant denial of the right to life, liberty, or the security of person."

Since 1946, the American government has provided billions in military aid to Israel, as well billions in loan guarantees to help Israel develop its qualitative military edge which it uses to almost exclusively torment and slaughter Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Whether that be to fund Israeli prisons, where an approximate 700 Palestinian children are prosecuted each year, over 75% of whom report being tortured and physically abused, the white phosphorus which rains over Gaza, or the bullets that murder and disable thousands of peaceful Palestinian demonstrators.

In theory, a single violation is enough to have military aid revoked from the violating unit, as per the Leahy Laws. And the most reputable of human rights organizations have reported Israel’s violations extensively. However, aid packages to Israel have only increased annually, with the help of Joe Biden. Yet, only a single publicly known investigation has ever taking place against Israel in 2006. Even though, the very author of the law, Senator Leahy, requested that the State Department investigate Israeli human rights violations in 2016.

In 2017, and again in 2019, Minnesota Representative, Betty McCollum drafted a bill, now classified under H.R. 2407: Promoting Human Rights for Palestinian Children Living Under Israeli Military Occupation Act. The bill employs the Leahy Laws to argue for an inclusion of the issue of Palestinian youth forced to stand before Israel military courts into the legislation, and therefore revoke aid from Israeli military and police units which conduct these practices.

In August of this year, Representative McCollum has similarly released H.R. 8050: Israeli Annexation Non-Recognition Act, which vows to revoke aid from Israel that could be used to directly or indirectly assist the annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank.

This legislation has garnered more and more support from representatives around the country, including Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (NY-14), Rashida Tlaib (MI-13) and Ilhan Omar (MN-05), reserving a space for Palestine in American politics. Yet unfortunately, the conversation amongst electoral candidates remains uninformed, trivial and dangerous.

Regardless of who prevails in November, both candidates undoubtedly have an "unshakeable" commitment to the apartheid regime that is Israel, and must be held to US law at the very least. This is not about electability, but complicity in crimes against humanity, and American voters have every right to raise their standards.
 
Re: Ho ho--Biden goes tooooo far, spills beans, but Jew says it might not be altogether "good for ki

Bought-And-Paid-For: Biden’s Long History Pandering to the Israeli Lobby

By Editors -
February 13, 2021

Link: https://covertactionmagazine.com/20...-long-history-pandering-to-the-israeli-lobby/

[see lots of pictures at site link, above]

[Source: timesofisrael.com]

Part 4 of: WHO IS JOE BIDEN, REALLY? — CAM exposes his 30-year history as a pawn of U.S.-Israel policy despite its ongoing violation of Palestinian rights and crimes against humanity.

While Democrats accused Donald Trump of being a Russian agent, they don’t seem to care that Biden is a bought-and-paid-for agent of the Israeli lobby.

In the late 1980s, Rannie Amiri, an independent commentator on political affairs, challenged then-Senator Joe Biden on his stance toward the Israel-Palestine conflict following a campus speech that Biden gave, asking him:

Rather than succumb to the influence of various lobbying groups in Washington, such as AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee—which promotes the views of Israel’s right-wing Likud Party], and the untold amount of money they use to dictate policy, wouldn’t it be more prudent to examine the real effects that collective punishment, daily humiliation, and countless civilian casualties inflicted by the Israelis have on an occupied population, and use that understanding to formulate a more rational approach toward the Palestinians?

According to Amiri, Senator Biden responded by walking directly from the podium to where he stood and, nose-to-nose, tried to refute his analysis about the influence of the Israeli lobby and the heavy-handed approach employed by Israel toward the Palestinians.

At the end of the exchange, Biden turned, put his arm around Amiri’s shoulder, and addressed the audience.

If this was not such a fine, articulate, and sincere young man, and he implied that my vote had been bought, I would give him a swift kick in the ass.

The audience roared in applause, and Amiri sat back down to his chair defeated. However, a friend rose up to defend him, telling Biden: “If my father heard you say such a thing, I believe he would have done the same to you first.”

Bought-And-Paid-For

Amiri’s remarks obviously hit a sore spot in Biden which remains relevant today—over 30 years later.

During the 2020 presidential election, pro-Israel Political Action Committees (PACs) provided Biden with $3,830,209, compared to $955,174 for Donald Trump—indicating that Biden’s vote on the Arab-Israeli conflict has indeed been bought—as it has been for many years.

The Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA), a Jewish lobby group that promotes Democratic Party candidates, proclaimed that “no candidate for president in either party has ever run with as long and as strong of a pro-Israel record as Joe Biden.”

Characterizing Biden as a “mensch [Yiddish term for man who does good deeds],” the JDCA pointed out that Biden, as Vice President, supported “unprecedented levels of security assistance to Israel,” helping to shape the record $38 billion, 10-year memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Israel signed in 2016.

Biden with right-wing Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu in 2016. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

During the 2014 Operation Protective Edge, which left more than 2,000 Gazans dead and 10,000 wounded, Biden was a key advocate securing support for “life-saving technologies like the Iron-Dome David’s sling and arrow anti-rocket and missile defense systems.”

An Israeli missile launched from the Iron Dome defense missile system, designed to intercept and destroy incoming short-range rockets and artillery shells, in the southern Israeli city of Sderot. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

Eric Lynn, a senior Pentagon official, told The Times of Israel that

as soon as that request was made by the Israelis in the middle of the conflict and taken to the president, Vice President Joe Biden’s words and President Obama’s words were, ‘Get it done.’

Young Biden and Golda

Biden was raised by Catholic parents who were staunchly supportive of Israel and imbued him with a great respect for the Jewish state and need for a Jewish homeland following the horrors of the Holocaust.

Biden’s connection to Israel deepened in 1973 when the then-thirty-year-old freshman Senator met with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir as part of a tour of Israel on the eve of the Yom Kippur War.

Biden considered the meeting “one of the most consequential” of his career. Meir chain-smoked as she went into vivid detail about the Six-Day War, reading letters from soldiers who had been killed, and then pored over maps detailing the regional security threats facing Israel.

Next to her sat Yitzhak Rabin, the future Prime Minister who had commanded the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in the Six-Day War.

When Biden expressed concern about Israel’s security, Meir allegedly told him “not to worry—we have a secret weapon in our conflict with the Arabs! You see we have no place else to go.”

(Left) Newly elected Democratic senator from Delaware, Joe Biden, on December 13, 1972; (Right) Prime Minister Golda Meir speaking at the United Nations, October 22, 1970. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

Biden at the time was somewhat critical of Israeli policies, warning Meir that Israel’s actions in the territories it had captured during the Six-Day War, including the West Bank and Gaza Strip, were leading to “creeping annexation.”

Believing that Israel was militarily dominant in the region, he suggested that the Jewish state might initiate a first step for peace through unilateral withdrawals from areas with no strategic importance—something Meir rejected.

Biden was further critical of the Nixon administration for being “dragged by Israel,” complaining that it was impossible to have a real debate in the Senate about the Middle East as Senators were fearful of saying things unpopular with Jewish voters.

However, after returning from his visit with Meir, Biden became more unequivocal in his support for Israel, moving away from the position of J. William Fulbright (D-AR.), Biden’s predecessor as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who warned that, “by underwriting intransigence,” Israel’s supporters in the U.S. were “encouraging a course which must lead toward her destruction—and just possibly ours as well.”[1]

J. William Fulbright [Source: wikipedia.org]
One of Israel’s Champions in Washington

In October 1975, Biden co-sponsored a Senate resolution advanced by Hubert Humphrey (D-MN) condemning a resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly equating Zionism with racism, and another in July 1975 legitimately expressing disapproval of attempts to expel Israel from the United Nations.

Five years later, Biden signed a letter with four other members of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (Frank Church (D-ID), Paul Sarbanes (D-MD), Jacob Javitz (R-NY) and Richard S. Stone (D-NY) urging reconsideration of the Carter administration’s rejection of an Israeli request to renew an agreement giving Israel preferential access to the U.S. strategic stockpile on diamonds, including the right to buy industrial diamonds at a negotiated price.

In May 1982, Senator Biden co-sponsored a resolution sponsored by Edward Kennedy (D-MA) barring weapons sales to Jordan, which had been at war with Israel since 1948, and which aimed to ensure that Israel retained its “qualitative military edge in the Middle East.”

Joe Biden (left) and Edward Kennedy (right) co-sponsored legislation that aimed to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge in 1982. The photo above was taken in 1972 when Biden first campaigned for the Senate. [Source: delawareonline.com]

Biden at this time was a leading opponent in the U.S. Senate of the proposed sales of advanced weapons systems like the F-15 fighters and AWACS radar aircraft to Saudi Arabia and other Arab states. In September 1981, he was quoted in The New York Times, stating: “If the administration tries to bring this deal up here now without modification, we will beat them.”

Several months later, Biden voted to not only dramatically step up aid to Israel—over the objections of President Reagan who was strongly pro-Israel—but supported a measure that would ensure U.S. aid to Israel would forever be equal to the amount of U.S. debt repaid by the country.

“It’s one of the most extraordinary proposals I have heard,” said Illinois Republican Charles H. Percy, the then-chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who opposed the measure. “The first time in the history of the United States. It makes the American taxpayer responsible for all Israeli debts and all future debts.”

Support for Lebanon War and Exchange with Menachem Begin

In June 1982, at the height of the Israeli war on Lebanon, which left 20,000 Lebanese civilians dead and was considered “Israel’s Vietnam,”[2] Biden was one of 36 Senators who met with Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin on Capitol Hill.

Israeli soldiers rampaging in Southern Lebanon following June 1982 invasion. [Source: honestreporting.com]

Biden’s colleague, Paul Tsongas (D-MA), expressed indignation at reports that Israel used cluster bombs against civilians in Lebanon.

Paul Tsongas [Source: wikipedia.com]
Tsongas said that “the love affair with Israel from the time of Golda Meir is gone because of Begin. How can I be concerned about human rights in El Salvador and the Soviet Union and not speak out on Lebanon?’”

Biden by contrast told Begin that he supported the war in Lebanon and went even further than Israel’s position, according to Begin, when he stated that he would “forcefully fend off anyone who invaded his country, even if it meant killing women or children.”

Begin said that he “disassociated myself from these remarks. I said to him [Biden]: No, sir; attention must be paid. According to our values, it is forbidden to hurt women and children, even in war … Sometimes there are casualties among the civilian population as well. But it is forbidden to aspire to this. This is a yardstick of human civilization, not to hurt civilians.”

Biden and Begin, also at the meeting, clashed over the issue of settlements.

Biden said he felt that Israel had to halt the policy of establishing new Jewish settlements in the West Bank, stating that Israel was losing support in this country [the U.S.] because of the settlement policy.

According to eyewitness reports, Biden banged the table as the exchange with Begin grew heated, and Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Israel over the settlement issue.

Begin’s reply became lore among his followers: “This desk is designed for writing, not for fists,” he said, according to an account written by a confidante just after Begin’s 1992 death.

Don’t threaten us with slashing aid. Do you think that because the U.S. lends us money it is entitled to impose on us what we must do? We are grateful for the assistance we have received, but we are not to be threatened. I am a proud Jew. Three thousand years of culture are behind me, and you will not frighten me with threats.

Begin added that U.S. aid to Israel was not a one-way street, stating that “we do a lot for you. And, also in recent battles, we did a lot for the United States.”

Menachem Begin [Source: mondoweiss.net]

A couple of weeks later, following the massacre of more than 700 Palestinians at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps by Lebanese Christian militias allied with Israel, Biden reaffirmed his support for the Lebanon war at a retreat held by the United Jewish Appeal Young Leadership Cabinet. Biden spoke there alongside the executive director of AIPAC and future Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating that Israel’s presence in Lebanon was “vitally important.”

Image from the aftermath of the Sabra and Shatila massacre which Biden refused to condemn. [Source: trtworld.com]

Biden later appeared at the annual conference of Herut Zionists of America (Herut was Begin’s original party) where he blamed the lack of Middle East peace on Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and pledged that his next order of business in the new Senate would be be to “educate my colleagues on the financial sacrifices Israel has made as a result of Camp David [accords signed by Jimmy Carter in 1979 ending Israel’s conflict with Egypt].”

In February 1984, Biden co-sponsored a resolution promoted by neoconservative Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) requiring that the U.S. Embassy in Israel and the residence of the U.S. Ambassador to Israel be moved to Jerusalem.[3]

Daniel Patrick Moynihan [Source: nytimes.com]

The move was later fulfilled under President Donald Trump in a blow against the Palestinians whose aim had long been to establish East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.[4]

The Best $3 Billion Investment

In June 1986, four years after his exchange with Begin and thirteen years after meeting Golda Meir, Biden gave an impassioned speech before the U.S. Senate in which he stated:

It’s about time we stop apologizing for our support for Israel. It is the best $3 billion investment we make. If there weren’t an Israel, the US of A would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region.

These interests centered on control of Middle Eastern oil, which was enabled by Israel’s function as a regional Gendarmerie.

A year after Biden’s speech, the U.S. topped the $3 billion threshold in the amount of aid it dispensed to Israel.

At the time, the Republicans were viewed as the party that was less friendly to Israel compared with the Democrats, as was exemplified by Biden.

In February 1986, Biden met with the former Israeli ambassador to the U.S., Meir Rosenne, and then-embassy staffer Yosef Lambden in an attempt to burnish his pro-Israel credentials in preparation for his first presidential run.

Meir Rosenne [Source: haaretz.com]
In their conversation, Biden asserted his belief that U.S. officials had not done enough for the Jews during World War II—an accurate assessment—and should not publicly criticize Israel as they would not do so to other favored allies like Great Britain, adding that Israel was “America’s best investment, where we get the biggest bang for our buck.”

In Biden’s view, a fatal mistake in U.S. policy had occurred in 1982, when the Reagan administration decided to strive for strategic consensus in the Persian Gulf and shifted the center of gravity from America’s true friend, Israel, to others [referring to the sale of warplanes to Saudi Arabia].

Biden went on at the meeting to compare the PLO to the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which originally fought British colonial rule during the country’s War of Independence (1919-1921).

Lambden wrote that,

as someone of Irish descent, [Biden] considered the IRA to be like any other terror organization which would never compromise with the moderates, with the lowest common denominator always holding sway.

Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from 1969 to 2004 and President of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) from 1994 to 2004. [Source: american.aljazeera.com]

This assessment ignores the circumstances that gave rise to the IRA and PLO and the fact that both were ridden by factional divisions between radicals and moderates and often amenable to diplomacy.

In 1974, the PLO adopted a ten-point platform that allowed for engagement in diplomatic channels, and provided validation for future compromises made by the Palestinian leadership in its goal of establishing a Palestinian state consisting of the West Bank and Gaza.[5]

By contrast, Israel, fearing that the Palestinians would exploit any territorial compromises or gains to improve its position for attacking and ultimately destroying it, largely pursued a rejectionist course—with the exception of some efforts in the late 1990s under Ehud Barak.

Israel believed that it would prevail in any conflict because of its military superiority.[6]

Biden felt he had to show his pro-Israel orientation while running for president in 1988. [Source: haaretz.com]

During the meeting with Meir and Lambden, Biden reiterated his commitment to Israel when he stated the U.S. should “tell the Arabs that Israel is foremost among its friends, and that if the Arabs had a problem with that, they should be aware that they would have a problem with the U.S. as well.”

Biden ended by saying that “Israel wouldn’t be sorry if he were elected to the White House”—a statement that holds just as true today, nearly 35 years later.

Choosing Goliath over David

While his ideological conviction appears strong, Biden’s strong support for Israel has at its core always been opportunistic.

Early in his career, Biden had taken rather nuanced and balanced positions on the Arab-Israeli conflict that dissipated over time. Biden told Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren that he lives by the dictum “Never crucify yourself on a small cross.” The message: The Palestinians are not influential enough to champion, and that taking up their cause would be political suicide.[7]

In a 2013 speech, Biden bragged that he had “done more fundraisers for AIPAC (the main Israeli lobbying organization) in the ’70s and early ’80s than—just about as many as anybody.” One year, he even participated in their membership drive.

Biden speaks at AIPAC conference. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

In the mid 1980s, Senator Biden’s personal assistant, Sam Lauter, a University of California Berkeley graduate, was on the board of the Democratic Majority for Israel, which tries to enhance support for Israel in the Democratic Party and was a decades-long AIPAC leader.

Lauter had met Biden at an AIPAC conference in the early 1980s. His mother, Naomi, a close friend of Nancy Pelosi, was involved in AIPAC’s founding in the 1950s and was a key Bay Area leader of the group.

Democratic political strategist Sam Lauter with Joe Biden in 2019 at a fundraiser in U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s house. [Source: jweekly.com]

During Biden’s 1988 presidential run, the youth director of his campaign, Jonathan S. Kessler, was a former AIPAC staffer, and one of his fundraisers, S. Harrison Dogole, a Philadelphia businessman, sat on AIPAC’s national advisory council and had a hand in two pro-Israel PACs. His national finance chair also began in political fundraising through AIPAC and other pro-Israel groups.

When Biden made another presidential run in 2008, his finance chairman, Michael Adler, a wealthy Miami real estate investor and bundler for Biden in 2020, was also an AIPAC lobbyist.

According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Biden had been the pro-Israel lobby’s “anointed candidate” in the 1988 race, and after the election he continued to be among the top ten Senate recipients of money from pro-Israel PACs, receiving tens of thousands of dollars from them each year.

Biden was also among the highest recipients of pro-Israel honoraria—cash payments from private groups for attending events like private meetings and seminars, or for delivering speeches. These not only ran around Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations but could be used by candidates to pay their personal debts.

“Part of Our Mishpucha:” The 1990s and 2000s

The effect of Biden’s ties to the Israeli lobby had become evident by the 1990s and 2000s when (1) Biden no longer publicly challenged any Israeli leaders on the settlements issue, (2) helped block peace overtures, (3) more vocally criticized Palestinians for promoting terrorism, and (4) sought to expand U.S. support to Israel even when it was taken over by the far-right Likud Party.

In 1991, when President George H.W. Bush tried to topple Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir by withholding loan guarantees over settlement activity, which Bush was trying to curtail, Biden signed up as an original co-sponsor to Republican-led legislation in the Senate that would have funded loan guarantees without condition.

Though devastated in 1995 to see his old friend Rabin assassinated for making overtures toward peace, Biden worked closely with his successor, Benjamin Netanyahu, whose political lineage traced to the militant, uncompromising strand of Zionism promoted by Zeev Jabotinsky, which believed that Israeli security could only be guaranteed through subjugation of the Palestinians.

Netanyahu counted Biden as a close personal friend since the 1980s, welcoming him to Israel as “part of our mishpucha [family].”

Biden and Netanyahu: Two old friends. [Source: israelhayom.com]

When a collection of Republicans sent letters to Clinton and other lawmakers denouncing the Clinton administration’s efforts to revive peace talks that had lain dormant following Rabin’s assassination, Biden and other liberals sent a gentler letter also discouraging the idea.[8]

In the early 2000s, when the second Palestinian uprising, or intifada, erupted after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon set foot on the Temple Mount, the third holiest site in Islam which Israel was trying to retain under its sovereignty, Biden introduced a Senate resolution expressing solidarity with Israel.

Biden further teamed up with Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to introduce and pass the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act, described by the Jerusalem Post as “one of the harshest bills ever drafted” against Palestinian terrorism and a rising Hamas, the Islamist militant organization that was elected to rule Gaza.

In April 2002, when the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) massacred civilians at the Jenin refugee camp and then bulldozed much of the camp, leaving some 4,000 people homeless, Senator Biden blamed the victims, claiming that Palestinian terrorists had hidden among the civilians, making their killing justifiable.

Image of remains of part of Jenin refugee camp after it was bulldozed by the IDF. [Source: hrw.org]

When Israel subsequently started carrying out its policy of assassinations, or so-called “targeted killings,” Biden insisted the extra-judicial killings were legal and even criticized the Bush administration for condemning them.

This latter stance signaled Biden’s transformation from the somewhat earnest young Senator who suggested to Golda Meir that Israel should withdraw from non-strategic territory that it occupied into a seasoned pol who understood the power of the Israeli lobby and was trying to gain political advantage from the Islamophobic political climate after 9/11 and fear about terrorism.

Eulogy of Ariel Sharon

Following Ariel Sharon’s death in 2014, Biden gave a stirring eulogy in which he characterized the former Israeli Prime Minister (2001-2006) as a “great man” whose “defining attributes–passion for the Jewish people, physical and political courage, and love of this land—all played out on the canvas of the State of Israel’s historic trajectory.”

Biden and Ariel Sharon in 2002. [Source: politico.com]

As an example of Sharon’s political courage, Biden cited Sharon’s push for the removal of Israeli settlers from the Gaza Strip following the second Intifada.

Biden left out that the settlers had to be removed because much of Gaza had been devastated by IDF forces in a siege Sharon had ordered, and were transferred to Israeli-occupied territory in the West Bank and Golan Heights as part of a settlement expansion plan there.[9]

Biden’s eulogy never mentioned the Palestinians, who considered Sharon a war criminal—starting with the Qibya massacre of 1953 when forces under his command killed at least 69 Palestinians in a West Bank village.[10]

The 1983 Kahan Commission found Sharon to be “personally responsible” for “ignoring the danger of bloodshed and revenge” that culminated in the Sabra and Shatila massacre in Lebanon.

Sharon also oversaw the suppression of the second Intifada (2002-2005) when the IDF had evolved into a “killing machine whose efficiency is awe-inspiring, yet shocking,” according to the Israeli daily Haaretz.[11]

Sharon was a hated figure among Palestinians. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

PLO official Dr. Mustafa Barghouti told the BBC that the Palestinians had no positive memories of Sharon.

Nobody should celebrate any death. But unfortunately, I have to say that Mr. Sharon left no good memories with Palestinians. Unfortunately, he had a path of war and aggression and a great failure in making peace with the Palestinian people.

PLO negotiator and Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi added

to me, it’s horrific to watch the hagiographies that are being produced by people like Vice President Biden…about a man who really should have ended his days at The Hague before the International Criminal Court.[12]

Vice President Joe Biden posed for pictures yesterday near Tel Aviv with his wife, Jill, members of a U.S. aviation regiment, Israeli soldiers, and the nation’s defense minister, Ehud Barak. [Source: archive.boston.com]

Veep

Biden was considered “the best friend of Israel in the [Obama] administration,” according to Chuck Schumer (D-NY), helping to secure what Netanyahu termed “unprecedented security assistance.”

Michael Oren wrote that Biden embraced the perspective of Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice-chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, that there should be “no daylight” between the U.S. and Israeli governments—when Obama himself had stated that during George W. Bush’s administration there had been “no daylight and no progress [on the peace process].”

In a March 2013 speech before AIPAC, Biden boasted that he did not know of any time “when there has [sic] been as many meetings, as much coordination, between our intelligence services and our military. Matter of fact, they’re getting tired of traveling back across the ocean, I think.”

Biden expressed further satisfaction that (1) America was the only country in the UN to vote against the establishment of a fact-finding mission on Israeli settlements; and (2) had invested $275 million in the Iron Dome missile defense system, including $70 million the president had directed last year on an “urgent basis,” and was working to “deploy a powerful new radar, networked with American early warning satellites.”

Biden went on to (3) defend Israel’s upholding a blockade against Gaza which the UN deemed to be illegal, and (4) brag about helping Israel with damage control after it was condemned for staging a military raid in May 2010 on a flotilla carrying relief supplies into Gaza that resulted in the death of ten Turkish activists.

Overlooked was a UN investigation which concluded that six of the activists were killed on the flotilla in a manner suggesting execution and that Israel’s actions betrayed an “unacceptable level of brutality.”

Activists hold banner of slain Turkish activists aboard Gaza Freedom Flotilla. [Source: flotillayves1.weebly.com]

Besides with its assault on the flotilla, Biden said in his speech he was proud that the Obama administration had “stood strongly with Israel in its right to defend itself after the Goldstone Report was issued in 2009.”

The latter was a report issued by a UN fact-finding team headed by South African jurist Richard Goldstone, which called for further investigation into war crimes committed in Israel’s 2009 Operation Cast Lead, which left 1,300 Gazans and 13 Israelis dead.

Biden said that, “while the rest of the world, including some of our good friend, was [sic] prepared to embrace the report, we came out straightforwardly, expressed our concerns and with recommendations.”

The U.S. by implication under Biden’s leadership was trying to repudiate and block a legitimate investigation into war crimes sanctioned by the UN and a majority of world opinion.

Judge Richard Goldstone with his report detailing Israeli war crimes in Gaza. [Source: theguardian.com]

Yesterday’s Man Fights the Winds of Change

President Biden is inheriting a different political landscape from his heyday in the Senate and even years as Vice-President, as public opinion on the Israel-Palestine conflict has begun to shift dramatically.

Norman Finkelstein’s book, Knowing Too Much: Why the American Jewish Romance with Israel Is Coming to an End, documents how Jewish liberals—including especially those under forty—increasingly do not identify with Israel’s right-wing, hyper-militaristic government and find Israel’s disregard for Palestinian rights to be shameful.

During the 2020 primaries, Bernie Sanders gave expression to their views as the first viable presidential candidate in decades to raise concern about Israel’s human rights record.

Others on the left wing of the Democratic Party are also taking up the question of Palestine as an integral part of their message against racism and austerity.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), for example, has pushed for legislation to defund Israel’s ongoing annexation of Palestinian land, and now-Congresswoman Cori Bush (D-MO) released a statement days before her primary victory which read:

Cori Bush stands in solidarity with the Palestinian people just as they have stood in solidarity with Black Americans fighting for their own lives.

Pro-Palestine Democrats: Cori Bush, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. [Source: english.alarby.co.uk]

As yesterday’s man, President-elect Biden has a clear task ahead of him in trying to restore the status quo and fight off the left flank of his party on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

When Sanders suggested during the primary that “we cannot give [aid] carte blanche to the Israeli government … We have the right to demand respect for human rights and democracy,” Biden retorted that “the idea that I’d withdraw military aid, as others have suggested, from Israel, is bizarre.”

Bizarre to him, perhaps; But not so to younger generations of voters who do not see Israel in the same way as their elders.


Notes

[1] Quoted in Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby, rev ed. (New York: Lawrence Hill Books, 1989), 96.

[2] See Noam Chomsky, Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians, rev ed. (Boston: South End Press, 1999), ch. 5.

[3] President Biden’s appointment as Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken stated that the Biden administration was going to keep the embassy in Jerusalem where Donald Trump’s administration had moved it.

[4] Daniel Kurtzer, Ambassador to Israel under President George Bush and Ambassador to Egypt under President Clinton, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2017 that the relocation of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem would not only cross a red line for the Palestinians but also, “for many Arab and Muslim states, including those with whom we share friendship and regional security interests.”

[5] See Paul Chamberlain, The Global Offensive: The United States, the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the Making of the Post-Cold War Order (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); Chomsky, Fateful Triangle, 68; Noam Chomsky, Failed States: The Abuse of Power and Assault on Democracy (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006), 177.

[6] Chomsky, Fateful Triangle, 39-80.

[7] Findley, They Dare to Speak Out, 33.

[8] U.S. President Bill Clinton consequently shelved his peace plan, which was revived fleetingly, at the end of his presidency.

[9] Chomsky, Failed States, 193.

[10] For an overview of Sharon’s career, see Baruch Kimmerling, Politicide: The Real Legacy of Ariel Sharon (London: Verso, 2006).

[11] Quoted in Stephen Walt and John J. Marsheimer, “The Israeli Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Working Papers, March 2006, https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy. The IDF fired one million bullets in the first days of the uprising, which is far from a measured response. According to the Jewish Virtual Library, nearly 5,000 Palestinians were killed compared to around 1,000 Israelis.

[12] Noam Chomsky characterized Sharon upon his death as a “brutal killer. He had one fixed idea in mind, which drove him all his life: a greater Israel, as powerful as possible, as few Palestinians as possible—they should somehow disappear—and an Israel which could be powerful enough to dominate the region. The Lebanon War then, which was his worst crime, also had a goal of imposing a client state in Lebanon, a Maronite client state. And these were the driving forces of his life.”
 
Back
Top