Flip leader, Duterte, says Philippines "aligns" w. China, rejecting Jew S A

[Apollonian]

Duterte aligns Philippines with China, says U.S. has lost​

Link: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-philippines-idUSKCN12K0AS

By Ben Blanchard

7 Min Read

BEIJING (Reuters) - Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced his “separation” from the United States on Thursday, declaring he had realigned with China as the two agreed to resolve their South China Sea dispute through talks.

Duterte made his comments in Beijing, where he is visiting with at least 200 business people to pave the way for what he calls a new commercial alliance as relations with longtime ally Washington deteriorate.

“In this venue, your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation from the United States,” Duterte told Chinese and Philippine business people, to applause, at a forum in the Great Hall of the People attended by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli.

“Both in military, not maybe social, but economics also. America has lost.”

Duterte’s efforts to engage China, months after a tribunal in the Hague ruled that Beijing did not have historic rights to the South China Sea in a case brought by the previous administration in Manila, marks a reversal in foreign policy since the 71-year-old former mayor took office on June 30.

His trade secretary, Ramon Lopez, said $13.5 billion in deals would be signed during the China trip.

“I’ve realigned myself in your ideological flow and maybe I will also go to Russia to talk to (President Vladimir) Putin and tell him that there are three of us against the world - China, Philippines and Russia. It’s the only way,” Duterte told his Beijing audience.

Duterte’s remarks will prompt fresh concern in the United States, where the Obama administration has seen Manila as an important ally in its “rebalance” of resources to Asia in the face of a rising China.

The administration agreed a deal with Duterte’s predecessor granting U.S. forces rotational access to bases in the Philippines and further doubts will be raised about the future of this arrangement.

In Washington, the U.S. State Department said it was “baffled” by Duterte’s comments and would seek an explanation when Daniel Russel, the top U.S. diplomat for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, visits Manila this weekend.

“We are going to be seeking an explanation of exactly what the president meant when he talked about separation from the U.S.,” said State Department spokesman John Kirby. “It’s not clear to us exactly what that means in all its ramifications.”

Related Coverage

U.S. to seek explanation of Duterte's comment on 'separation'

Both the State Department and the White House portrayed Duterte’s comments as being at odds with the close, long-standing alliance between the two countries. They said Washington would welcome closer ties between Beijing and Manila, however.

“The U.S.-Philippine alliance is built on a 70-year history, rich people to people ties and a long list of shared security concerns,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters, noting that the administration has not received any request from Filipino officials to alter bilateral cooperation.

A few hours after Duterte’s speech, his top economic policymakers released a statement saying that, while Asian economic integration was “long overdue”, that did not mean the Philippines was turning its back on the West.

“We will maintain relations with the West but we desire stronger integration with our neighbors,” said Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez and Economic Planning Secretary Ernesto Pernia in a joint statement. “We share the culture and a better understanding with our region.”

RED CARPET WELCOME

China has pulled out all the stops to welcome Duterte, including a marching band complete with baton-twirling band master at his official greeting ceremony outside the Great Hall of the People, which is not extended to most leaders.

President Xi Jinping, meeting Duterte earlier in the day, called the visit a “milestone” in ties.

Xi told Duterte that China and the Philippines were brothers and they could “appropriately handle disputes”, though he did not mention the South China Sea in remarks made in front of reporters.

“I hope we can follow the wishes of the people and use this visit as an opportunity to push China-Philippines relations back on a friendly footing and fully improve things,” Xi said.

Following their meeting, during which Duterte said relations with China had entered a new “springtime”, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin said the South China Sea issue was not the sum total of relations.

Slideshow ( 15 images )

“The two sides agreed that they will do what they agreed five years ago, that is to pursue bilateral dialogue and consultation in seeking a proper settlement of the South China Sea issue,” Liu said.

China claims most of the energy-rich South China Sea through which about $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. Neighbours Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam also have claims.

In 2012, China seized the disputed Scarborough Shoal and denied Philippine fishermen access to its fishing grounds.

Liu said the shoal was not mentioned and he did not answer a question about whether Philippine fishermen would be allowed there. He said both countries had agreed on coastguard and fisheries cooperation, but did not give details.

SEA DISPUTE TAKES ‘BACK SEAT’

Slideshow ( 15 images )

Duterte’s tone towards Beijing is in stark contrast to the language he has used against the United States, after being infuriated by U.S. criticism of his bloody war on drugs.

He has called U.S. President Barack Obama a “son of a bitch” and told him to “go to hell”, while alluding to severing ties with the old colonial power.

On Wednesday, to the cheers of hundreds of Filipinos in Beijing, Duterte said Philippine foreign policy was veering towards China.

“I will not go to America anymore. We will just be insulted there,” Duterte said. “So time to say goodbye my friend.”

The same day, about 1,000 anti-U.S. protesters gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Manila calling for the removal of U.S. troops from the southern island of Mindanao.

Duterte’s abrupt pivot from Washington to Beijing is unlikely to be universally popular at home, however. On Tuesday an opinion poll showed Filipinos still trust the United States far more than China.

Duterte on Wednesday said the South China Sea arbitration case would “take the back seat” during talks, and that he would wait for the Chinese to bring up the issue rather than doing so himself.

Xi said issues that could not be immediately be resolved should be set aside, according to the Chinese foreign ministry.

China has welcomed the Philippines approaches, even as Duterte has vowed not to surrender any sovereignty to Beijing, which views the South China Sea Hague ruling as null and void.

China has also expressed support for his drug war, which has raised concern in Western capitals about extrajudicial killing.

 

[Apollonian]

US strategic position eroding as position eroding as Philippines cozies up to China ​

by Abraham Mahshie, Defense Reporter | August 04, 2020 06:37 AM

Link: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ion-eroding-as-philippines-cozies-up-to-china

 Chinese naval exercises off the coast of the Philippines this summer finally forced the hand of President Rodrigo Duterte, if only for six months.

Despite a friendly relationship with President Trump, the Filipino president had maintained a hard line against the United States while continuing to appease China.

Promised Chinese economic investments, infrastructure development, and jobs were not forthcoming to boost the populist Duterte. Meanwhile, popular support for China is plummeting in the Philippines, and the Filipino military is growing concerned by Chinese activity near the disputed Spratly Islands.

Duterte’s June 1 rapprochement with the U.S. was measured: a six-month delay in the suspension of a Visiting Forces Agreement set to expire with the U.S.

Decades of close military-to-military cooperation with the U.S., a Mutual Defense Agreement dating back to the 1950s and assistance fighting Abu Sayyaf al Qaeda and Islamic State-linked terrorists in the south have not swayed Duterte to embrace the U.S. over China.

The U.S. struggle to right defense relations with the Philippines is an increasingly stubborn challenge, flying in the face of America’s Indo-Pacific goals, namely, preventing China from exercising a claim to the entire South China Sea.

“The United States-Philippines people to people ties are extraordinarily deep and have gone back for a very long time,” U.S. Indo-Pacific Cmdr. Adm. Phil Davidson told the Washington Examiner recently.

The question posed concerned military-to-military relations. These days, the U.S. has to rely on historical friendships and make the case that a partnership with America means security in times of crisis, such as when Islamic State-linked rebels took terrain in the southern Philippines three years ago.

“I would also say that our mil-to-mil ties, particularly in the wake of the seizures in Marawi in 2017 have been almost completely restored,” he said.

Davidson highlighted the recent suspension of the termination of the Visiting Forces Agreement between the U.S. and the Pacific island nation as a lukewarm sign of progress.

“If you can tolerate that double negative statement of it, which puts us in a better place,” he said. “I absolutely welcome the opportunity to continue to work with the Philippines.”

The trouble for U.S. plans to counter Chinese great power influence in the Pacific is that Duterte is not as welcoming.

Duterte’s cold shoulder

Herman Kraft, a University of the Philippines political science chair and regional security expert, explained to the Washington Examiner that Duterte’s disregard for the U.S. defense partnership has much to do with his view of America’s diminishing influence.

“He probably agrees with the idea that the United States is actually a power that is in decline and China is actually an emergent power,” Kraft said via Zoom from Manila. “China has always been associated with economic largess.”

Kraft said economic ties to mainland China are outsize compared to trade with the U.S.

“It’s really more a sense that the Philippines are better off guaranteeing its future working with China rather than the United States,” he explained.

“In his eyes,” Kraft said of Duterte’s calculus. “The security relationship between the Philippines and the United States is something that's totally unnecessary.”

The Center for Strategic and International Studies’s John Schaus told the Washington Examiner that relations with the Philippines are at their lowest in decades.

“Under Duterte, at least over the last three or four years, the U.S.-Philippines relationship is in its toughest place since 1991-'92,” he said.

That’s when a previous basing agreement expired over similarly nationalistic concerns, and the U.S. was forced to abandon Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Complex.

“He wants a more independent Philippines that is less dependent on the United States,” Schaus added.

The Asian security expert argued that cozying up to China is a means to an end for Duterte.

“One of Duterte’s goals is to grow the economy and create jobs and improve standards of living and China’s providing concrete, immediate benefits,” he said.

Military-to-military ties with the U.S., however, are institutionalized and deeply embedded.

“The security relationship is seen as something that is important,” Kraft said of the Armed Forces of the Philippines concerns with Chinese claims of land and water features within Philippines waters.

“The security relationship with the United States has become much more tangible,” he said.

Davidson said he has regular virtual dialogue with his AFP counterparts and the Philippines liaison at INDOPACOM headquarters in Hawaii.

“We have a longstanding alliance, and we look forward to continued, close security and defense cooperation in the Philippines,” he said.

INDOPACOM spokesman Maj. Randy Ready told the Washington Examiner that the Philippines Navy missile-frigate BRP Jose Rizal will also be participating in this month’s RIMPAC exercise in Hawaii.

Davidson added that Special Operations Forces operate in an advise and assist role in Mindanao and to the south, part of Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines, and overseas contingency operation to counter ISIS affiliates and other violent extremists.

“We have a number of special operators and support people that continue to help the Armed Forces of the Philippines,” Davidson said. “We’ll continue to have a relationship, strongly.”

Deterring China

Within months of Duterte’s suspension of the VFA, China began to encroach on Philippines waters. The move was in direct violation of a 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruling against China in a territorial dispute with the Philippines.

“They have increased their presence in and around Philippine-occupied features in the South China Sea,” said Schaus. “As China stepped up its presence, Duterte realized maybe now isn’t the right time to step back from the alliance.”

The U.S. also stepped up its freedom of navigation transits and aircraft carrier exercises, conducting two dual-carrier exercises in the South China Sea and the Philippines Sea.

Kraft explained that the VFA is about continuing U.S. involvement in the Philippines, from joint exercises to assuring an American response in a time of crisis.

“There's a concern that China is overreaching,” he said.

In a recent State of the Nation address, Duterte made it clear that Philippines bases will not be used by the U.S. against China in a conflict.

Kraft said the U.S. does not need Filipino bases to operate in the South China Sea. Further, the mere presence of U.S. forces in the Philippines reduces Chinese aggression against neighbors.

“It's not so much that the United States can actually use their Philippine deployment against China,” he said. “The way to actually look at it is that the fact that they’re here and can deploy in the South China Sea has some sort of effect on Chinese activities in the region.”

Kraft believes the AFP is increasingly concerned about China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea. The military’s cornerstone role in Duterte’s hardline administration means he too must respect their wishes.

“It's clear that the Philippine military actually prefers keeping the VFA, keeping all the operational aspects that the VFA actually makes possible,” he said.

“Duterte is careful about how he manages the relationship with the military,” Kraft said. “He is very careful about what he tries to push as far as weakening the relationship between the Philippines and the United States.”

Schaus said without the U.S., the Philippines is “going to have a harder time being a credible deterrent to Chinese incursions.”

“It was as much a signal to the Chinese to back off as it was a signal to the U.S. of a change of heart,” he said of the June 1 VFA announcement.

INDOPACOM declined to comment further on the nature of U.S.-Philippines military ties so to allow the State Department to continue negotiations before the six-month suspension expires in November.

The future of U.S.-Philippines military relations are still at risk, said both experts, with the results of the U.S. presidential election a factor in whether Duterte allows the VFA to expire.

“Those ties are strong,” said Schaus. “But without constant renewal, they atrophy.”