Doubt these are genocidal satanist psychopaths?--CDC votes to add deadly poisonous covid vaxxes to children's schedule


Guest Columnist

BREAKING: CDC Votes to Add COVID-19 Vaccines to Childhood Immunization Schedule​

by Zero Hedge
October 20th 2022, 2:01 pm


Soon kids will not be able to attend school without taking the COVID shot.

Update: As expected, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted 15-0 on Thursday to add Covid-19 shots to the children’s recommended vaccine schedule.

As the Post Millennial notes,

Speaking earlier in the morning, Dr. Patricia Wodi said that the Covid-19 vaccine has been placed as a recommendation from 6 months of age and older.
During a question period, one member of the committee raised questions over the vaccine being included on the schedule when it’s been recommended for use under an Emergency Use Authorizations, to which Wodi said they spoke with the Office of General Counsel, who said that it would be okay to add.
The vote comes after the committee approved 15-0 to add the vaccination to the federally funded Vaccine for Kids program, which provides vaccines to children at no or low cost to families.
Original article below:

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory committee is set to vote on Thursday over whether to add the Covid-19 vaccine to the recommended schedule of vaccines for children.

And while left-wing fact checkers were quick to point out that this doesn’t automatically mean schools will require students to take the jab – a decision made at the local level – even ABC News admits; “If the CDC does update its list of suggested vaccinations to include the COVID vaccine, which is available to anyone 6 months or older, that will open the door for states to begin making those calls, too.

The CDC also pushed back, stating that it’s Thursday meting is an annual gathering to simply update which vaccines doctors should recommend to their patients – with no acknowledgement that most doctors are going to follow it.

“Thursday, CDC’s independent advisory committee (ACIP) will vote on an updated childhood immunization schedule. States establish vaccine requirements for school children, not [the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] or CDC,” the agency wrote in response to a segment by Fox News‘ Tucker Carlson, who reported that the updated childhood vaccine schedule would soon mean that kids “will not be able to attend school without taking the COVID shot.”

“State laws establish vaccination requirements for school children. These laws often apply not only to children attending public schools but also to those attending private schools and day care facilities,” the CDC writes on its website, adding “All states provide medical exemptions, and some state laws also offer exemptions for religious and/or philosophical reasons.”

Tucker responds:

The CDC complained about our segment on the Covid vaccine being required for kids to attend school. We stand by what we said. Here's our response.
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 20, 2022

On Wednesday, a CDC advisory committee separately decided to add the COVID vaccine to the Vaccines for Children program, which provides government-funded jabs to children who aren’t insured or can’t afford to pay.

CDC Votes 15-0 to Add COVID-19 Vax to "Vaccines for Children (VFC)" Program
— Wittgenstein (@backtolife_2023) October 19, 2022

“Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for all ages and populations remains critically important,” said the CDCs Dr. Sara Oliver at the meeting, ABC News reports. “This includes now, while the vaccines are being supplied by the federal government, and in the future, when we one day move to a commercial program.”

Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) slammed the decision, calling it “Appalling!”

This is the same committee that approved booster vaccines for children despite no evidence that COVID boosters reduce transmission, hospitalization, or death among children. Appalling!
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 19, 2022

Paul had more to say on the topic:

With even Big Pharma tempering their enthusiasm for mandating COVID vaccines on young people, will Fauci-enthusiasts at CDC still vote to mandate COVID vaxx on kids?
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 19, 2022

And as Summit News notes, Paul responded recent revelations from Boston University, which recently made headlines for genetically engineering a strain of Covid with an 80% mortality rate in mice.

more deception…And they wonder why no one trusts Fauci and his cronies 🤔
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 19, 2022

Others noted that there’s little to no data on how the Omicron strain of Covid-19 affects children.

I’d love to see the data on the Omicron vaccine in children but the Biden admin will not release it. Dr. Jha claims he’s (privately) seen it and it’s good. Why can’t it be made public?
— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) October 18, 2022

So – while adding the Covid-19 vaccine to the list of recommended childhood immunizations does not automatically mean kids will be forced to get it if they want to attend school – it’s nothing more than a game of semantics when it’s clear that most schools will follow the guidance.

These are the pediatric cases of vax myocarditis CDC will acknowledge. They know it’s 10x more likely to occur in males than females, and they claim their advice is based on risk-benefit, yet their recommendations do not account for this greatly increased risk in males vs females
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) October 20, 2022

As Alex Berenson writes in The Burning Platform;

If I were a Republican candidate in a blue state, I would have ads about school Covid vaccine mandates ready to go today, assuming the the CDC vaccine committee is foolish enough to throw this chum in the water. At a time when countries all over the world are now rejecting mRNA shots for kids, can our public health “experts” really be this stupid? Or this beholden to the mRNA companies?

Experience suggests the answer is yes.


Guest Columnist

Renowned Doctor Finds Connection Between Excess Mortality and 'Vaccines', Nobody Dares to Publish his Research​


[see vid at site link, above]

Dr. Spiro Pantazatos co-authored a study on mRNA-induced fatality rates: data that he says has been suppressed by most major publications and journals.​

Lioness of Judah Ministry
Oct 21

By Miranda Sellick October 20, 2022
At the outset of the pandemic, Dr. Spiro Pantazatos, a clinical neurobiologist and researcher at Columbia University (on leave), vowed he would stay in lockdown until a vaccine was available. He was a believer. But then he began to question the story being told. Next, he studied the data.
Dr. Pantazatos has found a clear link between the rollout of experimental mRNA vaccines and excess mortality numbers. While life insurance companies began screaming from the rooftops in the late spring of 2022, Dr. Pantazatos was well ahead of the game, producing a paper that demonstrated this link in October 2021. But nobody wanted to read his findings, and no medical journal would publish the paper. “It was diplomatically rejected by many editors at medical journals,” he told Dr. Drew in his eponymous podcast.

Dr. Pantazatos’ paper comes to a simple conclusion using publicly available data; the more vaccines administered, the higher mortality observed. “The number of deaths in each state correlated with the number of vaccinations administered in the previous month,” he said.
However, a basic tenet of data comparison and scientific research says that correlation does not mean causation. In this case, it gave medical journals the opportunity to dismiss his findings by saying that nobody knew if it was the vaccines causing these mortality spikes. But Dr. Pantazatos subsequently cross-referenced his data with that of VAERS deaths, which only strengthened his conclusion that vaccines and excess mortality are linked. His data show that in February, March, and April of 2021, excess mortality was only statistically noticeable in the older age groups. It was not until May that you start to see this in younger age groups,” he said. “The fact that this pattern emerged from the data indicated to me that this is a real signal because that matches the temporal rollout.”
Nobody wanted to know. “When I first had these findings, I thought I had to get it to The Lancet immediately as they have a rapid publishing arm and even in-house statisticians. But they rejected it.” Dr. Pantazatos appealed, explaining that it wasn’t your usual covid submission. “I thought they’d want to get the information out there before the first booster shots.”
Dr. Pantazatos still has no explanation for the continued stonewalling of his findings. He suggests many reasons, including a conflict of interest between scientific journals and big pharma and the possibility that he was just too far ahead of the curve. “At the time, it was too against what everyone was saying. I think the journals have a fear of retraction. They were acting under peer pressure and had a fear of publishing something that was so different in its conclusions.”
But that argument no longer holds water. A cursory scratch at the surface of the vaccine-will-save-us-all narrative shows that for every one hospitalization avoided, there are 4.3 serious adverse events; that after five months, the vaccines have negative efficacy. In other words, they make recipients more susceptible to the virus, not less. That the known risk of myo- and pericarditis for young men now outweigh any benefits; that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and was never tested to do so, confirmed recently by a Pfizer executive to a committee of the European Parliament. And still, Dr. Pantazatos’ paper remains unpublished in a scientific journal.
On the strength of his findings, Dr. Pantazatos launched a petition letter to the administration at Columbia University on the subject of the vaccine mandates being imposed on faculty and students from September 2021 “to help raise awareness,” he says. “I implored them not to trust public health agencies and asked them to rely on global data.” He even attached 140 citations to support the data. He tried to meet with administrators; however, he has not succeeded in doing so. Mandates remain in effect; he is officially non-compliant and remains on leave.
“I think a lot of people in power had to make difficult decisions, and they genuinely thought a mandate would bring people back to campus,” he said. But there’s no longer any excuse for that position. “It’s the same arrogance that makes people think they can make medical choices for people they have not met.”

Related articles: [go to site link, above, top, to ck these, below, articles]

Unprecedented: Mortality in Finland Has Risen to All-Time Highs. Australian Deaths Are 17.5% More Than the Historical Average
Something Terrible is Unfolding: Europe Records 53000 Excess Deaths in July
A Public Health Emergency in Canada: All-Cause Excess Mortality Accelerates Beginning in Summer 2021
Edward Dowd: Sudden Adult Deaths and Disability Data Analysis. What Changed in 2021?
The Inventor of the Polio Vaccine Wanted To Depopulate the World
How the Medical Establishment Is Working With the Cabal To Facilitate Global Genocide. National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 and the Global Depopulation Agenda
Pfizer and the New World Order Depopulation Agenda: Anti-Sperm Antibody Is One of the "Adverse Events of Special Interest" Found in the Secret Pfizer Document
PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER: Alarming Data From Canada and Vaccines Batch Scandal


Guest Columnist

COVID-19 Vaccines Have Caused 84% of All Deaths Recorded in VAERS for the Past 32 Years – Pfizer #1 in Vaccine Deaths, Even Before COVID​


by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The U.S. Government Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was started in 1990 to track injuries and deaths reported after receiving a vaccine. Congress mandated by law that the government maintain this database as part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions.
It was created in the 1980s, after lawsuits against vaccine companies and health care providers threatened to cause vaccine shortages and reduce U.S. vaccination rates, which could have caused a resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases.
Any individual, of any age, who received a covered vaccine and believes he or she was injured as a result, can file a petition. Parents, legal guardians and legal representatives can file on behalf of children, disabled adults, and individuals who are deceased. (Source.)
Since the emergency use authorization of the COVID-19 vaccines in December of 2020, through the latest update of the VAERS database on October 14, 2022, 84% of all deaths reported after vaccination for the past 31+ years have been reported following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source)

The company that has produced the most vaccines resulting in deaths recorded in VAERS is Pfizer, and they held that top honor even before they partnered with Biontech to produce their mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, when they partnered with Wyeth to produce other various vaccines.
Moderna, which had never produced a vaccine before producing their mRNA COVID vaccine in 2020, now holds the second spot at nearly 24% of all deaths ever recorded following a vaccine injection. (Source.)

As the public becomes more aware of these government statistics in VAERS, there are efforts to downplay their significance. One argument is that since there were so many doses of the COVID-19 vaccine administered, the statistics are naturally higher for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines.
Well, that claim is very easy to debunk using the U.S. Government’s own statistics.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has published a report that lists the total number of doses administered for all FDA approved vaccines from 2006 through 2021. You can view the .pdf here on the U.S. Government website.
So let’s compare the number of cases filed in VAERS and the number of deaths reported to VAERS for the second most deadly vaccine according to VAERS, which HIB, Haemophilus influenzae, a vaccine that is primarily given to babies and children under the age of 5.
Prior to the COVID-19 EUA vaccines, it was the most deadly vaccine given to children.
Here is what the CDC says about the HIB vaccines:

Why get vaccinated?​

Hib vaccine can prevent Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease.
Haemophilus influenzae type b can cause many different kinds of infections. These infections usually affect children under 5 years of age but can also affect adults with certain medical conditions. Hib bacteria can cause mild illness, such as ear infections or bronchitis, or they can cause severe illness, such as infections of the blood. Severe Hib infection, also called “invasive Hib disease,” requires treatment in a hospital and can sometimes result in death.
Before Hib vaccine, Hib disease was the leading cause of bacterial meningitis among children under 5 years old in the United States. Meningitis is an infection of the lining of the brain and spinal cord. It can lead to brain damage and deafness.
Hib infection can also cause:
  • Pneumonia
  • Severe swelling in the throat, making it hard to breathe
  • Infections of the blood, joints, bones, and covering of the heart
  • Death
Hib vaccine is usually given in 3 or 4 doses (depending on brand).
Infants will usually get their first dose of Hib vaccine at 2 months of age and will usually complete the series at 12–15 months of age.
Children between 12 months and 5 years of age who have not previously been completely vaccinated against Hib may need 1 or more doses of Hib vaccine.
Children over 5 years old and adults usually do not receive Hib vaccine, but it might be recommended for older children or adults whose spleen is damaged or has been removed, including people with sickle cell disease, before surgery to remove the spleen, or following a bone marrow transplant. Hib vaccine may also be recommended for people 5 through 18 years old with HIV.
Hib vaccine may be given as a stand-alone vaccine, or as part of a combination vaccine (a type of vaccine that combines more than one vaccine together into one shot).
Hib vaccine may be given at the same time as other vaccines. (Source.)
This is the information about HIB vaccines that the CDC provides for doctors to give to parents.
Here is the information that they do NOT give to these parents, which is what is recorded in VAERS for the HIB vaccines:

There have been 5 vaccines approved by the FDA that contain the HIB vaccine, and since they have been on the market, there have been 2,387 recorded deaths, 1,448 recorded permanent disabilities, over 25,000 visits to the ER, and over 14,000 hospitalizations.
And remember, this is on the CDC immunization schedule, and these shots are primarily given to babies and children under the age of 5.
If you are a parent considering giving this vaccine to your child, wouldn’t you want to know these statistics? And how many children under the age of 5 get HIB each year?
It is hard to find current stats because the CDC is famous for providing “estimates” and not raw data on causes of death, but a study published in 2012 looked at data from 1999 through 2008 in 5 states and 5 metropolitan areas representing a population of 27,779,979 in 1999 and 35,559,550 in 2008.
During that 9-year period they identified 4,839 cases of HIB, which included 828 children. That’s less than 100 children per year, and no children between the age of 1 and 17 died, and among the few deaths of children under 3 months of age, half of them were born prematurely.
And yet, the CDC keeps this vaccine in their immunization schedule for children, and every year thousands of cases of adverse reactions are filed in VAERS, and dozens of children die after receiving the vaccine, and those are just the cases filed in VAERS, which is vastly under-reported and only about 1% of all cases. (Source.)
And who are the companies producing these vaccines that keep making money off of them?

Pfizer, partnering with Wyeth, was involved with about 84% of all HIB vaccines administered. (Percentages total more than 100 due to vaccine combination doses.)
So let’s compare this very deadly vaccine with the COVID-19 vaccine, in terms of how many cases and how many deaths are being recorded in VAERS based on number of doses administered.
According to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program stats published here, there were 145,484,518 doses of HIB administered between 2006 and 2021 (this includes all the combo vaccines that contain HIB.)
According to VAERS, 35,422 cases of injuries following the HIB vaccines were filed during those years, with 925 deaths. (Source.)
So based on these government statistics, a case was filed in VAERS for HIB vaccines for every 4,107 doses administered, and a death was filed in VAERS following HIB vaccines for every 157,281 doses administered.
How does that compare to the COVID-19 vaccines?
According to the CDC, there have now been 632,905,664 doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered in the U.S. (Source.)
As of the latest update to VAERS, these doses have resulted in 1,437,908 cases, and 31,534 deaths. (Source.)
So a case was filed in VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines for every 404 doses administered, and a death was filed in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines for every 20,071 doses administered.
COVID-19 vaccines produced 10x more cases to VAERS per dose administered, and 7.8x more deaths, than the HIB vaccines, which were the most deadly vaccines for adverse events and deaths in VAERS prior to the COVID-19 shots.
And the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) just recommended that the COVID-19 shots be added to the childhood immunization schedule.

Conclusion: This is a Vaccine Cult and has Nothing to do with Science or Facts​

It has been encouraging to see some people in the medical field finally wake up and take notice that there is massive fraud in the pharmaceutical industry as well as in the U.S. Government and their alphabet agencies with the COVID-19 shots.
But let’s be honest with the facts here. Almost ALL of these doctors, many of whom are now making a new career out of criticizing the COVID-19 shots, and even then only really criticizing “mandates” or only criticizing the shots for certain age groups but recommending them for others, are only criticizing the very worst of the worst corruption that came about through the COVID scam.
This corruption, however, has taken years, DECADES actually, to get to a point where this COVID scam could be pulled off, and not a one of them, to my knowledge, is speaking out against this corruption and opposing the entire corrupt vaccine industry, because to do so would end their careers in the medical field.
The entire medical industry, which actually has only been around for a very short period of human history, is full of Satanic symbols and is based mainly on beliefs, and very little on science, and these beliefs completely exclude God and deny God’s creative and redemptive powers that allow man to achieve true health.
The medical industry has no interest in actual cures, because those would put them out of business. It is a disease management system, and the most profitable business on the planet now, where they not only manage diseases, but also create them.
In short, it is a religious cult, with incredible brainwashing and mind control power over the masses.


Guest Columnist

Over $16 million in PA tax dollars spent on children’s sex reassignment surgeries and related services since Gov. Wolf took office, new report shows

NOV 1, 2022


National attention focusing on this meteoric rise of taxpayer-funding on these procedures for minor children.

(HARRISBURG, PA) A new report details how Pennsylvania taxpayers have been forced to cover “sex reassignment” surgeries and related services, to the tune of over $16.7 million since Governor Tom Wolf took office in 2015.
“This level of state-endorsed harm upon children is reprehensible,” stated Alexis Sneller with the Pennsylvania Family Institute. “While we knew the Wolf administration was funding services related to these irreversible procedures on minors, now seeing the exact numbers — millions spent towards these detrimental acts — is still shocking.”
Through a Right-To-Know request submitted by the Pennsylvania Family Institute, the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services revealed that to date, since 2015, over $16.7 million in tax dollars has been used from Pennsylvania Medical Assistance “on sex reassignment and transition related services and drugs for service.”
What is equally alarming is the rise in spending. In 2015, the amount spent on children’s “sex reassignment” surgeries and related services totaled $78,000. Just two years later, it totaled over $1 million. In 2021, the total jumped to nearly $4 million.

Table 1: Pennsylvania Medical Assistance spending on sex reassignment and transition related services and drugs for service, yearly (Source: PA DHS)
2015: $78,073.38
2016: $667,590.43
2017: $1,080,906.95
2018: $1,843,718.85
2019: $2,687,248.71
2020: $2,740,378.42
2021: $3,928,854.71
2022: $3,708,281.27*
* Calendar year 2022 is incomplete.
Included in these totals are expenditures from the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), along with Fee-For-Service (FFS) paid claims, and both physical and behavioral health paid encounters through HealthChoices.
“From 2015 to 2021, Pennsylvania saw a nearly 5000% increase in spending on “gender-affirming” care for minors under 18,” reported Christina Buttons with the Daily Wire. “None of these U.S.-based organizations that endorse “gender-affirming” care have done systematic reviews of the evidence, while arguably more leftist European countries like Sweden, Finland, and England have. After reviewing the evidence for the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in treating pediatric gender dysphoria, health authorities in all three countries have decided to abandon the “gender-affirming” model, finding the costs outweigh the benefits.”

Questions remain as to who are the major recipients of all this taxpayer funding. A major recipient is likely Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Gender Clinic. Co-founder, Nadia Dowshen, told the Pennsylvania House Health Committee that they receive referrals from foster care and homeless youth shelters, all being minors covered under Pennsylvania Medical Assistance.
Dowshen thanked Dr. Rachel Levine, former Pennsylvania Secretary of Health and Pennsylvania Physician General, for the “amazing work to make sure young people have coverage of these medications” in light of how expensive the sterilizing cross-sex hormones can be for patients.
“Transing” children can be a big moneymaker for hospitals. In a recently released 2018 recording of a lecture by Dr. Shayne Taylor, from the Vanderbilt Clinic for Transgender Health in Tennessee, he states: “These surgeries make a lot of money. So female-to-male chest reconstruction can bring in $40,000. A patient just on routine hormone treatment who I’m only seeing a few times a year can bring in several thousand dollars… It actually makes money for the hospital.”
“When Gov. Wolf took office, he unilaterally changed state policy to cover things like double mastectomies to remove healthy breasts from minor girls and irreversible experimental hormones for children,” said Emily Kreps with PA Family Institute. “The same drugs used to chemically castrate convicted sex offenders are being funded by tax dollars for minors. This type of “care” is happening right now at major institutions like CHOP, Penn State Health and UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh — especially to children in foster care.”
The “transgender industry” seems to be driven equally by monetary profit and the radical gender ideology that makes it possible. It’s an industry that is set to raise more profits from harming more children. And now we know over $16 million of our tax money has gone to help fund it.


Guest Columnist

Leaked Hospital Email Reveals Explosion of Stillbirths Following COVID Vaccine Rollout​

by Jamie White
November 2nd 2022, 11:44 am


“This is clearly an extreme danger signal. The statistical probability of this occurring by chance alone is zero," says OB-GYN physician.
A leaked email sent out to hospital staff at a Fresno, California hospital reported an increase in stillbirths that is expected to continue.
The email leaked to The Epoch Times by a staffer who wished to remain anonymous for fear of losing their job explained last week that the stillbirth rate has skyrocketed from the pre-COVID-19 vaccine average of one to two every 90 days in her hospital alone.
“There were 22 demise patients in August [2022], which ties the record number of demises in July 2021, and so far in September there have been 7 and it’s only the 8th day of the month,” a managing nurse wrote, adding she hopes the “trend doesn’t continue indefinitely.”
Exposed: Leaked Hospital Email Reveals Explosion of Stillbirths

“I know of a few more that are scheduled to deliver in the week ahead, so unfortunately the process is going to be very familiar with all of you,” the managing nurse said.
Epoch Times Photo
Page 1
Epoch Times Photo
Page 2
According to Florida-based OB-GYN Dr. James Thorp, the emails are consistent with VAERS data and findings by numerous health organizations, and he noted the stillbirth rate actually decreased from 2018-2020, showing COVID-19 did not contribute to the increase in the stillbirth rate.
“It is also consistent with the data from our recently published study, the VAERS database, UK Yellow Card, World Health Organization’s VigiAccess, European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance, World Council of Health, and even from Pfizer’s own internal documents from their 5.3.6 postmarketing data that they attempted to suppress for 75 years,” Thorp said.
“Let that sink in: the peer-reviewed publications documenting severe adverse events after the COVID-19 vaccines in just 15 months dwarfs all other such reports from all other vaccines administered on all of the planet earth over the past century,” Thorp said.
“According to the national U.S. fetal death rate (stillbirths) per 1,000 births, there was a decline in rates from 5.89 in 2018 to 5.74 in 2020, convincingly suggesting that COVID-19 infections did not increase stillbirth rates in 2020.”
But using the data from the email, including the 22 stillbirths observed in July 2021 and August 2022, Thorp concluded the stillbirth rate went from 5.74 per 1,000 births in 2020 to 29.3 per 1,000 births in 2021 and 2022, more than a fourfold increase.
“This is clearly an extreme danger signal,” Thorp said. “The statistical probability of this occurring by chance alone is zero, and this could potentially be likened to a very rare 20-sigma event.”
Despite the alarming data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) encourages pregnant women to get the COVID-19 injection.
“CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccines for everyone aged 6 months and older, including people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or those who might become pregnant in the future. This recommendation includes getting boosters when it is time to get one,” the agency states on its website.


Guest Columnist

CDC Study: 49% of Children Ages 5 to 11 Experienced Systemic Reactions After Getting New COVID Booster​

According to responses to v-safe, 48.9%, or 1,594 children, in the 5 to 11 population who got a new booster between Oct. 12, 2022, and Jan. 1, experienced one or more systemic reactions.

By The Epoch Times


children systemic reaction covid booster feature

By Zachary Stieber

More than 1,600 children aged 5 to 11 experienced a systemic reaction such as fever or diarrhea after receiving one of the new COVID-19 vaccines, according to a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Of 3,259 children in the age group who received an updated Pfizer or Moderna vaccine and were registered in the v-safe system, nearly half experienced a systemic reaction, CDC researchers found.
Systemic reactions, defined as “usually mild” and lasting for multiple days, include fatigue, chills, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, joint pain and diarrhea. On a severity scale, the category of reactions is between local reactions and severe reactions.
According to responses to v-safe, a smartphone survey system started by the CDC during the COVID-19 pandemic to monitor vaccine safety, 48.9%, or 1,594 children, in the 5 to 11 population who got a new booster between Oct. 12, 2022, and Jan. 1, experienced one or more systemic reactions.
The most common was fatigue, followed by headache, fever, myalgia — muscle pain — and chills. The least common was rash.
Sixty-four of the children sought medical care but none were hospitalized, according to the CDC, which published the study in its quasi-journal on Jan. 13.
Most reports of needing medical care indicated that the case was not related to vaccination, according to the CDC.
Seven hundred and two children experienced a health impact, such as being unable to attend school or being unable to perform “normal daily activities.”
Researchers also reported the number of reported adverse events among the population to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), another safety monitoring system.
Between Oct. 12, 2022, and Nov. 20, 2022, there were 920 reports that were processed by CDC researchers, most of which were for vaccination errors such as an incorrect dosage administered. Some, including 21 for fever, were for systemic events.
The reports do not prove causality with a vaccine but are an undercount of the true number of post-vaccination events, according to studies and U.S. health officials.
Two of the reports, both after Pfizer vaccination, were for serious events, including a child who developed symptoms of a rare illness called Miller Fisher syndrome.
There were no reports of death in either system.

The public-facing VAERS site does not allow a breakdown for ages 5 to 11. Between Nov. 1, 2022, and Jan. 6, there were 46 events for children aged 3 to 5.

During the same time, 235 events were reported for children aged 6 to 17, including two hospitalizations, seven emergency room visits and a permanent disability.

Between Oct. 12, 2022, and Jan. 1, some 953,000 children aged 5 to 11 received one of the new bivalent boosters, after they were cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sans clinical data.

The CDC recommends the new shots for all individuals down to 6 months of age.

Even though more than a third of a year has passed since the authorization, no clinical data is available yet.

The CDC cited a different CDC study, which estimated effectiveness from real-world data, in the new paper in asserting that the bivalent vaccines provide “significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19. The cited paper suggested the new boosters increase protection, but that the protection is substandard.

Limitations of the new study include v-safe being voluntary and VAERS being a passive surveillance system.

The CDC researchers said the preliminary safety findings “are reassuring.” They also said that, in comparison with “the low risk of serious health effects” after vaccination with the Pfizer or Moderna shots, the effects of COVID-19 infection “include death and serious long-term sequalae.”

Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.


The CDC did not report the events that happened on the day of vaccination for v-safe registrants, and only published data for one through seven days after vaccination.

That time period “is not nearly long enough to characterize safety,” Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, told The Epoch Times via email.

He also took issue with the comparison of adverse events following vaccination with the effects of infection, noting the CDC cited a 2022 study it published that included all ages above 5.

That study dealt only with cardiac adverse events and presented conclusions — that the risk of heart inflammation is higher among all age groups following infection than vaccination — that have been challenged by other papers.

“The present study is of 5-11-year-olds, who have an infection fatality risk of well less than 3 per million, whereas the cited reference is of all ages, mostly adults, who have increasingly greater risks with age. The stated comparison of children with adults is thus invalid,” Risch said.

While the study “is being represented by CDC as showing vaccine safety in this age group, no comparison to actual quantitative risks of Omicron infection serious adverse events has been performed,” he added.

Children are the least likely age group to die from COVID-19, studies and data show.

The infection fatality rate — the ratio of mortality for confirmed and inferred infections — was just 0.0003% for those aged 0 to 19, a recent study found.

Some 1,433 deaths in the U.S. among children involved COVID-19, according to the CDC’s analysis of death certificates, though the number is adjusted from time to time as accurate death counts remain difficult to determine, despite there being years since the first COVID-19 death was recorded.


Guest Columnist

Infants and Children Under 12 Given the Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Seven Months Before Pediatric Approval. 71% Suffered Serious Adverse Events.​

By Dr. Barbara Gehrett, Dr. Joseph Gehrett, Dr. Chris Flowers, and Loree Britt
Global Research, February 01, 2023
DailyClout 31 January 2023



All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – produced a shocking review of the paediatric data found in
[Confidential[Pfizer document [released under FOI in October 2021] entitled:
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6“).

It is important to note
1) that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product and
2) no pediatric dose of the Pfizer product was approved for use during that time frame.
What dose(s) of Pfizer’s mRNA “vaccine” was given to these children since no approved dose existed?
Important points from this report include:
  • A seven-year-old experienced a stroke.
  • One child and one infant suffered facial paralysis.
  • One infant had a kidney adverse event, either kidney injury or failure.
  • Of the 34 cases, 24 (71%) were classified as serious.
  • Predominantly female patients were affected — at least 25 of 34 (73.5%) patients.
  • Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals. However, 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were “not consistent with pediatric subjects.”
  • Ages ranged from two months to nine years, with median 4.0 years, which means half the children were under four years of age.
  • 132 adverse events were reported in the 34 children – i.e., an average of 3.88 AEs per child.
Shockingly, Pfizer concluded:
“No new significant safety information was identified based on a review of these cases compared with the non-paediatric population.”
Please read the disturbing, two-page report by the Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) here. [see]


Guest Columnist

COVID-19 Vaccinated High School Children Are Having Cardiac Arrests, Heart Attacks While Playing Sports — Plus 31 Shocking VAERS Reports, Some of Them Fatal​

By Dr. William Makis
Global Research, March 13, 2023
COVID Intel 12 March 2023



All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (desktop version)
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

18 yo Ohio high school athlete had a heart attack

Ebonie Sherwood is a High school athlete in Ohio. She collapsed during track practice on March 7, 2023 and had no pulse. She was brought back with CPR and is currently on a ventilator and ECMO machine. (click here)
“She is a three-sport athlete. She is one of the healthiest kids we know. She is so active”
Doctors are baffled. “Her doctors want to see if her heart will be able to heal itself, or if a device will have to be put in to help her heart.
“Worst case scenario she would need a heart transplant.

17 yo North Carolina cheerleader had a heart attack

17 year old Keianna was warming up for a cheer competition in Raleigh, NC when teammates noticed she was acting “weird”. Her muscles were flexing and her eyes were rolled back in her head. Keianna was having a seizure and was not breathing. She also had no pulse (cardiac arrest) (click here).
CPR was started, then she was given a shock with a defibrillator. She had 3 more seizures in the hospital and had to be intubated.

17 yo Florida high school cross country runner had a heart attack after 5K race

17 year old Gabe Higginbottom, a high school cross country runner had a heart attack on Sep.10, 2022, after finishing a 5K race in Pensacola, Florida. (click here)
He was rushed to the hospital and was found to have a blocked right coronary artery requiring an angioplasty. Later, they performed a 3-hour surgery inserting two stents and found two blood clots.

17 yo Florida golfer died suddenly while practicing for upcoming Golf Tournament

17 year old Tyler Erickson, senior high school student in Florida, was found lifeless at a golf course due to a “heart attack or blood clot” while practicing for an upcoming golf tournament, according to a statement from the family. (click here)
He spent the day practicing on the golf course, and in the evening his family found him slumped over on the floorboard of his golf cart. His body was lifeless and CPR did not revive him.

16 yo Idaho high school athlete suffered heart attack while weight-lifting

16 year old Travis Johnston was lifting weights in the gym on Oct.21, 2021 when he suffered a cardiac arrest. Once resuscitated, his body went into a coma and stayed in coma for 48 hours. (click here)(click here)
Since coming out of the coma, the high school junior is suffering from “severe delirium” and is “extremely confused.”

16 yo Nevada high school athlete suffered heart attack while playing flag football and died

16 year old Nevada high school student Ashari Hughes collapsed during a varsity flag football game on Jan.5, 2023, was hospitalized and died later that night. (click here)
According to the Clark County coroner, the cause of death was reported to be a congenital heart condition (anomalous origin of the right coronary artery). Her death was described to have been of “natural causes” (click here)
However, there was no testing done to examine the possibility of COVID-19 vaccine damage to her heart.

14 yo North Carolina high school student died while riding a bull at a rodeo

14 year old Denim Bradshaw died on Jan.28, 2023, after riding a bull at a rodeo for the first time and suffering from a cardiac arrest. He died at the hospital (click here)
Singapore Ministry of Health awards $225,000 to 16 year old boy who had a cardiac arrest while lifting weights after 1st Pfizer dose:
Singapore’s Ministry of Health has awarded a 16 year old boy $225,000 compensation after suffering a cardiac arrest 6 days after receiving 1st Pfizer dose on June 27, 2021and requiring intensive care (click here).
Medical investigations revealed he had developed acute severe myocarditis which led to the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The myocarditis was likely a serious adverse event arising from the COVID-19 vaccine he received, which might have been aggravated by his strenuous lifting of weights (click here)
Under the Vaccine Injury Financial Assistance Programme (VIFAP) provided by the Ministry of Health (MOH), a one-time financial assistance of $225,000 has been extended to the youth and his family because his condition was severe and critical

31 US VAERS cases of high school children having cardiac arrests after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

VAERS 1187918: 15 yo girl with complex medical issues had cardiac arrest 3-4 days after 2nd Moderna dose & died on April 6, 2021 (New Hampshire)
VAERS 1199455: 17 yo girl had difficulty breathing & chest pain, suffered cardiac arrest 8 days after 1st Pfizer dose & died on April 10, 2021 (Wisconsin)
VAERS 1225942: 16 yo girl had cardiac arrest at home 9 days after 1st Pfizer dose & died on March 30, 2021. Had pulmonary emboli (Wisconsin)
VAERS 1328262: 17 yo girl presented 29 days after 1st Pfizer dose, severe bilateral pulmonary embolism with severe right ventricular hypertension and heart failure, had cardiac arrest, required ECMO in PICU, managed in Cardiac ICU (Georgia)
VAERS 1340501: 16 yo boy presented with 36 hours of chest and left arm pain, had myocardial infarction 1 day after 2nd Pfizer dose, ST elevation, Troponin in 1000s, hospitalized (California)
VAERS 1387747: 17 yo boy woke up with sudden chest pain, had myocardial infarction 2 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, ST elevation, was hospitalized (Missouri)
VAERS 1420762: 17 yo girl had cardiac arrest 6 days after Pfizer dose, and died on June 23, 2021 (location unknown)
VAERS 1431289: 13 yo boy had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 17 days after 1st Pfizer dose, had large cerebellar hemorrhage and died on June 20, 2021 (Minnesota)
VAERS 1446789: 15 yo autistic boy with ADHD was coughing 6 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, had two cardiac arrests (New Jersey)
VAERS 1474063: 16 yo boy had severe chest pain, myocardial infarction 2 days after 1st Pfizer dose, elevated troponins, hospitalized (foreign)
VAERS 1651389: 16 yo boy had severe chest pain, myocardial infarction and pericarditis 3 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, Troponins 7000+, was hospitalized (Texas)
VAERS 1693654: 15 yo boy had cardiac arrest while driving a friend 10 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, suffered severe anoxic brain damage, on life support (Texas)
VAERS 1702154: 16 yo boy had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 6 days after 1st Pfizer dose & died on Sep.1, 2021 (foreign)
VAERS 1796194: 14 yo boy had myocardial infarction and pericarditis 19 days after 1st Pfizer dose and was hospitalized in ICU. Permanently disabled (did not recover) (foreign)
VAERS 1828901: 17 yo girl presented with chest pain & dyspnea for 48hr, 36 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, had cardiac arrest and died on Oct.21, 2021 (Washington)
VAERS 1830419: 16 yo boy had cardiac arrest while running, after 2nd Pfizer dose, had hypoxic encephalopathy, permanently disabled (foreign)
VAERS 1959638: 15 yo girl presented with chest and arm pain, had myocardial infarction 1 day after 1st dose of Pfizer, permanently disabled (foreign)
VAERS 1971636: 14 yo girl had dizziness, headache, then cardiac arrest 15 days after 1st Moderna dose, same day brain injury, died in hospital on Oct.10, 2021 (foreign)
VAERS 1991078: 14 yo girl presented with dyspnea, seizure, had cardiac arrest 8 days after 1st Pfizer dose, died Nov.6, 2021 (foreign)
VAERS 2042005: 13 yo boy had cardiac arrest 7 months after 2nd Moderna dose & died suddenly on Jan.1, 2022 (New Hampshire)
VAERS 2112926: 13 yo girl had heart attack symptoms 14 days after 1st Pfizer dose and was hospitalized for 5 days (Pennsylvania)
VAERS 2151665: 14 yo boy had cardiac arrest while at friends home 41 days after 2nd Pfizer dose, CPR started, had to be revived 3 times, defibrillator installed (New York)
VAERS 2152560: 7 yo boy had cardiac arrest 13 days after 1st Pfizer dose & died on Feb.16, 2022 (Washington)
VAERS 2171205: 17 yo boy had acute myocardial infarction same day as 3rd dose of Pfizer, increased troponins, recovered (foreign)
VAERS 2263095: 15 yo boy had myocardial infarction same day after 3rd Pfizer dose, was seen in emergency (foreign)
VAERS 2264954: 13 yo boy had myocardial infarction and pericarditis 3 days after 1st Pfizer dose, permanently disabled (foreign)
VAERS 2398786: 17 yo boy had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 6 days after 3rd dose of Pfizer and died on Jun.22, 2022 (foreign)
VAERS 2458174: 15 yo girl had a cardiac arrest after 2nd Moderna dose and died (location unknown)
VAERS 2535782: 11 yo boy had 3rd dose of Pfizer at 340pm, at 715pm was found face immersed in bathtub, cardiac arrest, died 9pm Dec.13, 2022 (foreign)
VAERS 2543364: 14 yo girl had 1st dose of Moderna, 16 days later had headache, dizziness, fever, then cardiac arrest, died on Oct.11, 2021 (foreign)
VAERS 2582452: 12 yo girl had acute myocardial infarction 5 days after 1st Pfizer dose and died on Nov.10, 2021 (foreign)

My take…

Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can cause both cardiac arrests (myocarditis) and heart attacks (blood clots), both of which can lead to sudden death.
We are seeing more and more cardiac arrests and heart attacks in COVID-19 vaccinated high school students. Many of these incidents are fatal.

I have provided 31 VAERS cases in this article.
Parents must be made aware of the very serious risks posed by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in all children, but especially in children who are physically active.
Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines should never have been introduced in children of any age.


Guest Columnist

‘Simply Obscene’: FDA Approves Fourth COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5​

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision Tuesday to allow infants and children 6 months through age 4 to get Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot drew harsh criticism from pediatricians and others who said children don’t need any COVID-19 vaccines, let alone four doses.

By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.


fda fourth covid vaccine infants kids feature

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
Infants and children 6 months through age 4 who received the three-dose primary series of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are now eligible for a fourth dose — Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Tuesday amended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Pfizer bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine for the younger age group, but only for those children who received the three-dose series before the FDA authorized Pfizer’s bivalent Omicron booster as the third shot in the primary series.
Under the amended authorization, children can receive their fourth shot two months after completing the three-dose primary series.
Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said the authorization gave parents the opportunity to “update their children’s protection.”
But critics including Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, an internist and cardiologist, said the shots pose long-term safety concerns for children.
“I am greatly concerned about the long-term safety of accumulating novel mRNA and Wuhan spike protein in previously healthy children,” McCullough told The Defender. “Continued shots are not natural and cannot make their bodies healthier.”
Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense said:
“If one ever needed proof of which side the FDA is on, Pharma’s or the people’s, one need look no further than its authorization of a fourth COVID shot for children under 5.
“With knowledge that these shots don’t work and that they can cause severe harm, including death, this decision is simply obscene.”
Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatrician with more than 40 years of experience in acute and integrative medicine, told The Defender, “Medical logic and reason have taken a back seat to an unfathomable policy based on fiction.”
Perro added:
“With the steady stream of information now available on VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] and other global vaccine reporting systems, the harm caused to children from this unnecessary ‘vaccine’ is nothing short of pediacide.”
Perro pointed out that according to some researchers’ estimates, children under 18 are 51 times more likely to die from the mRNA vaccines than from COVID-19 if unvaccinated.
Perro, who said she will deliver a conference lecture in April on how to help children who have been harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines, said:
“The time is now for parents to do what’s best for their children and refuse this experimental technology.”
Muriel Blaive, Ph.D., tweeted:

Aaron Siri, a civil rights attorney who sued the Centers for Disease Control to release its V-Safe vaccine injury data, tweeted:

New clinical trial had ‘no published results’
The agency said it based its decision to authorize the fourth shot on previous analyses of earlier Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine efficacy data and on new clinical trial data from 60 children ages 6 months through 4 who, after completing the three-dose primary vaccination and receiving the booster shot, “demonstrated an immune response” to both the original COVID-19 virus strain and the Omicron subvariants.
The new clinical trial “had no published results” but was presented to the FDA in a Jan. 26 meeting slide show, said blogger Igor Chudov.
According to Chudov’s analysis, the data included “the strangest count of participants.”
Slide 16 of the presentation showed there were 21 babies in the clinical trial before the fourth shot — and 23 babies after the shot, he pointed out.
“How is that even possible? And why did no one present at the FDA meeting ask questions?” Chudov asked.
Chudov pointed out that under the new authorization, the four-dose vaccination sequence could be completed within four months after starting at age 6 months.
“Therefore, a 10-month-old infant could have four mRNA Covid vaccine doses,” he said.
Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist and epidemiologist and member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, said the official data released by the U.K. and German governments suggest you are 20 times as likely to injure a child with an mRNA vaccine than to benefit them.
In a Substack post today, Nass said Dr. Scott Jensen, a family physician and former Minnesota State Senator, noted that the number of mRNA vaccine doses needed to vaccinate young children to prevent one hospitalization for severe illness is more than 224,000 doses.
Assuming the risk of injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine is similar for children to the overall risk the German health minister disclosed, you would have to vaccinate more than 112,000 5- to 11-year-old children with two shots and seriously injure 22 of them as a result, in order to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization.
“Anyone who is cognizant of these data and recommends mRNA COVID vaccines for children is in my view guilty of professional malfeasance, a crime and needs to immediately be brought to justice,” said Nass.


Guest Columnist

Study finds 1 in every 99 COVID Vaccinated Toddlers require Emergency Care or Hospitalisation​



A study conducted by scientists from several respected institutions across Germany & Switzerland has discovered that 1 in every 99 Covid-19 vaccination children aged 5 and under require emergency care or hospitalisation.
The scientists also found that the risk of children requiring emergency care or hospitalisation following Covid-19 vaccination was 117% higher than the average risk following vaccination with any other type of vaccine.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

The study was published on October 18th 2022, and is titled ‘Comparative Safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine vs Other Approved Vaccines in Children Younger Than 5 Years’.
The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer) Covid-19 vaccine in children vaccinated before they reached the age of five.
Children included in the study had received at least one dose of the Pfizer injection and had written informed consent from a parent.
The study included 7806 children of an average age of 3, 3,824 of which were female, and 3,977 of which were male, and their symptoms following Covid-19 vaccination were followed up for an average of 91.4 days.
The scientists concluded the following –
The data from this cohort study provide evidence for a self-reported safety profile of the BNT162b2 vaccine that is comparable to non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this large cohort of children younger than 5 years.
This is a very strange and inaccurate conclusion when you look at the actual results of the study.

The above chart shows the rate of symptoms following Pfizer Covid-19 vaccination in the left column and the rate of symptoms following non-Covid-19 vaccination in the next column.
In regards to any symptom being reported, the results show that 1.02 in every 2 children suffered some form of adverse event following Covid-19 vaccination. Whereas just 0.75 in every 2 children suffered some form of adverse event following any other type of vaccination.
This means the risk of children aged 5 and under suffering an adverse event is 36% higher following Covid-19 vaccination than it is following any other vaccination.

In regards to adverse events reported involving the pulmonary system, which includes airways, lungs and blood vessels, the results show that 1.43 in every 100 children suffered some form of illness of the pulmonary system following Covid-19 vaccination. Whereas just 0.47 in every 100 children suffered some form of illness of the pulmonary system following any other type of vaccination.
This means the risk of children aged 5 and under suffering illness of the pulmonary system is 204% higher following Covid-19 vaccination than it is following any other vaccination.
The results also show the exact same risk in relation to neurological disorders, which are illnesses of the brain and nerves.
In regards to adverse events reported involving cardiovascular disorders, which include illnesses affecting the heart and blood vessels, the results show that 0.38 in every 100 children suffered some form of cardiovascular disorder following Covid-19 vaccination. Whereas just 0.27 in every 100 children suffered a cardiovascular disorder following any other type of vaccination.
This means the risk of children aged 5 and under suffering a cardiovascular disorder is 41% higher following Covid-19 vaccination than it is following any other vaccination.

These are all serious adverse events of which the risk of suffering is significantly higher among children following Covid-19 vaccination. So the conclusion of the scientists the “safety profile of the BNT162b2 vaccine is comparable to non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccines ” is nothing short of an outright lie.
And that’s before we even take into account the number of children requiring emergency care of hospitalisation.

According to the results of the study, 1 in every 99 children aged 5 and under required emergency care (ambulatory) or hospitalisation (inpatient) following Covid-19 vaccination. This compares to 0.46 in every 99 children requiring emergency care or hospitalisation following any other type of vaccination.
This means the risk of children requiring emergency care or hospitalisation is 117.4% higher following Covid-19 vaccination than it is following any other vaccination.

Therefore, the scientists’ conclusion of this study is not worth the paper it is written on. The actual conclusion should read –
The data from this cohort study provide evidence the Covid-19 injections cause significantly more injuries and harm than non-Covid-19 injections.
The problem is it doesn’t, despite what the results prove, and we can guarantee the false and fraudulent conclusion of the study will be used to justify adding the Covid-19 vaccine to the mandatory childhood vaccine schedule in the USA.