Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Here's fm the Ajax Jewsn (Infowars.com) contest for best satirical efforts on covid madness ginned-up by globalists, big-Pharma, and Jews-media
Coming to light, slowly but surely--FAUCI BEHIND THE COVID BIO-WEAPON, SUCKERS
- Thread starter Apollonian
- Start date
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
BREAKING: Dr. Fauci Funded 60 Projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and All Were in Conjunction with the Chinese Military
September 19, 2021 0 Comments FacebookLink: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2021/09/breaking-dr-fauci-funded-60-projects-at.html
New revelations have come out about Anthony Fauci, the mad medic, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President. This time from Australia.
We first noted the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2020 and in April noted that the Institute experimented with live animals.We also know that all work in virology in China is connected with the Chinese military and therefore any work in China in this area is in conjunction with the Chinese military.
Sharri Markson from Sky News is coming out with a book that’s a culmination of her efforts studying Anthony Fauci. She notes the following on Sky News hours ago:
Here is Sky News report.
Dr. Fauci never shared any of this with President Trump in the early months of the pandemic.
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Wuhan Scientists Planned To Release 'Chimeric Covid Spike Proteins' Into Bat Populations Using 'Skin-Penetrating Nanoparticles'
Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/political...vid-spike-proteins-bat-populations-using-skinby Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Sep 22, 2021 - 07:00 AM
18 months before the pandemic, scientists in Wuhan, China submitted a proposal to release enhanced airborne coronaviruses into the wild in an effort to inoculate them against diseases that could have otherwise jumped to humans, according to The Telegraph, citing leaked grant proposals from 2018.
The bid was submitted by zoologist Peter Daszak of US-based EcoHealth Alliance, who was hoping to use genetic engineering to cobble "human-specific cleavage sites" onto bat Covid 'which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells' - a method which would coincidentally answer a longstanding question among the scientific community as to how SARS-CoV-2 evolved to become so infectious to humans.
Daszak's proposal also included plans to commingle high-risk natural coronaviruses strains with more infectious, yet less deadly versions. His 'bat team' of researchers included Dr. Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center.
Darpa refused the contract - saying "It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk," while warning that Daszak hadn't fully considered the dangers involved in enhancing the virus via gain-of-function research, or by releasing a vaccine into the air.
As the Telegraph aptly notes (and you'll never hear from Maddow, Lemon or Hayes), Daszak is the same guy behind a letter published in The Lancet last year which ruled out the lab leak hypothesis, and temporarily stifled debate on the origins of Covid-19.
"For more than a year I tried repeatedly to ask questions of Peter Daszak with no response," said Viscount Ridley, who has co-authored an upcoming book on the origin of Covid-19, and has repeatedly implored the House of Lords to dig deeper into the origins of the pandemic. "Now it turns out he had authored this vital piece of information about virus work in Wuhan but refused to share it with the world. I am furious. So should the world be," he added.
"Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and ‘batified’ mice, and much, much more."
The documents, released by an international consortium of scientists known as 'Drastic Research,' were authenticated by a former Trump administration official. According to the group, "The actual DEFUSE Proposal Documents will be published in due course."
"Given that we find in this proposal a discussion of the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites, a review by the wider scientific community of the plausibility of artificial insertion is warranted," Drastic said in a statement.
Enhanced MERS?
One anonymous World Health Organization (WHO) scientist told The Telegraph that Daszak's grant proposal shockingly proposed plans to enhance the more deadly MERS (Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome).
"The scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses," said the source, adding "These viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2."
"If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic."
Just remember, the initial cover story started with 'bat soup.'
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Drs. Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci must be ARRESTED, as new intel emerges documenting planned coronavirus enhancement and deployment
Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/09/drs-peter-daszak-and-anthony-fauci-must.htmlA team of scientists named Drastic have been investigating the origins of covid-19, uncovering multiple years’ worth of gain-of-function coronavirus research. When the genetic sequence for covid-19 was first identified, scientists were appalled at how evolved the virus was, how it contained an enhanced human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein. Now it’s becoming clear how this came about.
Drastic unveiled a series of controversial grant proposals submitted by zoologist Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance in New York. These grants not only sought to enhance coronavirus infectivity, but also sought to release highly-penetrable spike protein nano-particles into the wild! The unethical project sought $14 million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and was set to be initiated in 2018.
Dr. Daszak intended to release enhanced coronavirus spike proteins into the wild
DARPA did not approve the $14 million, and said, “It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk.” DARPA warned that Daszak and his team had not properly considered the dangers of enhancing the virus and releasing a vaccine by air. Neither DARPA nor the NIH tried to stop the research from going forward, however.These grants reveal Daszak’s INTENT to develop and release highly infectious viruses and spike protein nano-particles for advancing vaccine research. Daszak is joined by Dr Shi Zhengli, the “bat woman” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Centre.
Daszak and his collaborators planned to develop genetically enhanced, chimeric viruses that could readily infect humans. According to the documents, researchers sought to combine “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses, allowing viruses to readily enter human cells. The proposal even sought to enhance Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), a coronavirus strain with low transmissibility but a 30 percent fatality rate!
This research required that scientists from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology intentionally release enhanced, airborne coronaviruses into bat populations in China. These bat populations were to be subsequently inoculated with experimental vaccines against diseases that could cross over into human populations. The research would assist scientists in identifying pathogens of greatest concern so that lucrative vaccine programs could be developed. This controversial research was proposed just eighteen months before the first case of covid-19 was identified in Wuhan China. Daszak wrote in the grant application that they would “conduct educational outreach … so that there is a public understanding of what we are doing and why we are doing it, particularly because of the practice of bat-consumption in the region.”
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, said Daszak’s research could have continued without DARPA funds, especially with how much was time, energy and money was already invested in the project. “This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,” Dalgleish said — contradicting Dr. Anthony Fauci, who denied the fact that NIAID funded this type of research.
Daszak, Fauci and their collaborators must be arrested, with a full criminal investigation to follow
According to the document release, Dr. Daszak and his collaborators planned to release nano-particles that could penetrate the skin. These nano-particles contained “novel chimeric spike proteins” from bat coronaviruses. These enhanced, skin-penetrating spike proteins were set to be released into cave bats in Yunnan, China. The documents reveal that covid-19 is more than a virus. It’s a biological weapon that was strategically developed and slated for deployment in 2018.With the CCP working closely on this research, it’s plausible that these spike protein nano-particles could have been released anywhere in the world, stealthily and without remorse. These spike protein nano-particles can be released over cities to cripple medical systems and exploit the vulnerabilities of hospitals and fragile immune systems. They could also be used to target specific types of people at specific event venues. Additional intel documents reveal that the Chinese military planned aerosolized bioweapon development and deployment to “cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse.”
Daszak’s grant applications include unethical animal and virus release experiments, with the threat of serious repercussions for human populations. Dr. Peter Daszak and Dr. Anthony Fauci are culpable for the origins of covid-19. It is of preponderance that these doctors be ARRESTED. Many in the scientific community are calling for a full CRIMINAL investigation into their roles in establishing and completing these diabolical, macabre research projects. Daszak and Fauci must be brought to trial and interrogated, with the greater scientific community calling for a new system of ethics to stop these deadly experiments on animals and humans and to stop the censorship and abuse. All the relevant gain-of-function research these doctors participated in, oversaw and lied about must be brought forth and meticulously addressed.
In early 2020, Daszak conspired with several other scientists who were invested in coronavirus gain-of-function research. Daszak authored the paper in the Lancet to shut down any scientific debate or investigation into the origins of covid-19. Daszak even thanked Fauci in private emails for downplaying the lab leak theory in front of the world stage. Fauci lied to U.S. Congress about the research he approved and funded, denying his well-documented role in overseeing these unethical coronavirus gain-of-function research projects that exploit human immune systems.
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
More US gov’t documents support claim that COVID-19 is a falsified pandemic
Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/more-us-govt-documents-support-claim.htmlThe more one looks into the U.S. federal government’s pandemic, biodefense, and national health security legal actions, strategies, and plans which were updated leading up to and during COVID-19, the more one may be convinced of the possibility of COVID-19 being a falsified pandemic.
Multiple approaches have been taken to support the claim that COVID-19 may be a falsified pandemic. One approach was to prove that COVID-19 death counts and case counts were falsely increased by government entities like the CDC to be used to scare and coerce citizens into actions desired by the government.
Another approach is to continually expose the hypocrisy of public health officials and politicians regarding the draconian COVID-19 restrictions they force onto citizens while they themselves clearly ignore such restrictions. This approach is based on the idea that high-ranking public health officials and politicians would probably know if (the emphasis is on if) COVID-19 is some sort of multi-year pandemic preparedness “operations exercise.”
Other politicians and/or public health officials might be informed of this through leaks by employees from powerful federal bureaus or departments who are aware of its potential falseness. And, in this scenario, those who would know that COVID-19 is a falsified pandemic would themselves ignore the draconian COVID-19 restrictions.
There have been several instances of such politicians and public health officials acting as if COVID-19 is not a big deal. One example is the numerous public health officials and politicians who supported large crowds rioting in May 2020 and thereafter. If COVID-19 was a real, dangerous pandemic, public health officials and politicians would not support such rioting.
Another approach is to study closely the legal actions and publications – the “paper trail” – of U.S. federal government politicians and public health officials leading up to and during COVID-19. This approach is extremely helpful, and in doing so, one discovers that not only is it possible that COVID-19 may be falsified, but one may begin to wonder if several other seemingly perfectly timed political and cultural events over the years may have been falsified local, regional, or national “drills” or “exercises.”
U.S. government may have planned ‘convening’ a national, multi-year ‘exercise’
Previous articles discussed multiple pandemic laws which were updated in 2019, only a few months before the reported outbreak of COVID-19.Such U.S. pandemic and “all hazards” preparedness laws and directives give authority to an individual known as the “Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response” (ASPR) to “carry out drills and operational exercises” in coordination with U.S. government departments like the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, the Department of Justice (which includes the FBI), and several others.
Previous articles also discussed the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022, which was released in early 2019. It is a document required by U.S. laws, including the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019. Thus, the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 is apparently a type of pandemic preparedness legal document.
Another previous article discussed some wording in the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 which may be interpreted to suggest that the U.S. government planned to “convene” a national pandemic response and recovery exercise. The segment of the document in question is as follows:
Previous articles provided supporting discussion for the claim that the aforementioned segment may have been a subtle attempt for public health officials and/or politicians to legally cover their plans to “convene” a national, multi-year pandemic exercise.
The articles described the U.S. government’s FEMA’s classified exercises which may be one attempt at a legal method (among multiple) which public health officials may use to falsify a pandemic and call it an “operations exercise” or something similar. (It is a bit of a tangent, but it has since been discovered that related documents, like the ASPR Strategic Plan for 2020-2023, use the word “convene” to describe the objective or plan to complete future actions; see pages 21 and 54.)
But there may be more significant information supporting the claim that the above-cited segment of the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 is subtly mentioning plans to “convene” a multi-year response and recovery pandemic exercise. Remember, the “Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response” (ASPR) has the authority to “carry out drills and operational exercises” with basically any government bureau or department necessary. The ASPR apparently last released a strategic plan in 2014 (page 2). It may be significant that the ASPR released an updated Strategic Plan, dated April 2020, which coincides with COVID-19.
But within the ASPR’s Strategic Plan for 2020-2023, one finds a very similar segment to that which is found in the above-cited National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 – except the ASPR’s strategy clearly says the plan is a “multi-year and multi-level exercise program.” Before getting to that segment, it should be mentioned that the ASPR’s Strategic Plan notes that it
In other words, the ASPR’s Strategic Plan appears to be stating that it is a type of legal document supporting the “implementation” of other pandemic laws and legal documents. This is significant because it is more of a “paper trail,” so to speak, of legal actions or documents leading up to and during COVID-19.
But the significant (slightly abridged) section of the ASPR’s Strategic Plan 2020-2023 is as follows:
Within the same objective of strengthening “response and recovery operations,” the document states that
Now, compare the emphasized segments from the ASPR Strategic Plan for 2020-2023 with the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022, beginning with a sub-objective and abridged as follows:
Again, the ASPR has the authority to carry out drills and exercises, some which may be “without notice.” The National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 has the sub-objective to “convene a unified, national response and recovery” while the ASPR Strategic Plan 2020-2023 has the plan to “fully implement, test, and validate the various components of the ASPR Incident Response Framework … including … ongoing exercising” of “operational doctrine” and “establish a … multi-year and multi-level exercise program designed to … achieve and sustain national preparedness to … respond to, and recover from all-hazards disasters,” which would include pandemics.
It appears as though both the ASPR Strategic Plan 2020-2023 and the National Health Security Strategy 2019-2022 may be using potentially deliberately over-wordy statements to provide in legal documents the same plan to falsify an “ongoing” “catastrophic threat” at the “national” level for “multiple years” and then legally attempt to label this as an “exercise,” “exercise program,” or something similar.
If COVID-19 is falsified, it would surely fit the description of an “ongoing” “catastrophic threat” at the “national” level for “multiple years.”
Falsified activities legal for ‘law enforcement’ or ‘intelligence’ reasons
Some may question why public health officials may, somewhat secretively and ambiguously, attempt to put plans for such a falsified pandemic in legal documents. One potential answer is that an illegal falsified pandemic may meet the definitions of international or domestic terrorism. “Hoaxes” would also be illegal, unless the hoax isNow, in the FBI’s own words, “The FBI is a primary law enforcement agency for the U.S. government.” And the aforementioned law which apparently allows hoaxes to be performed by such law enforcement agencies may be one reason why, in 2016, President Obama ordered the FBI to link “public health and law enforcement, and coordinate with INTERPOL [The International Criminal Police Organization] on the GHSA [Global Health Security Agenda] and its successful implementation.”
It may also explain why the section describing the ASPR’s authority to “carry out drills and operational exercises” was amended in the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019 soon before COVID-19 to include a provision for the Director of National Intelligence to coordinate with the ASPR to “inform preparedness and response capabilities.” (S. 1379—38) “Hoaxes” or other similar falsified activities are claimed to be legal for “law enforcement,” “intelligence,” and “protective” reasons.
Mainly, though, if public health officials and politicians planned on convening a falsified, realistic “response and recovery” operations exercise, they would attempt to legalize the activity, exercise, program, or whatever they might call it. Otherwise, it would probably meet the definition of domestic terrorism, as described in federal laws:
The emphasized part exempts activities that are not a violation of criminal laws. So politicians, public health officials, and other federal bureaus and departments may first attempt to ensure that their planned falsified pandemic exercise would not be a violation of criminal laws. Either way, it would still be an act of terrorism (deaths due to unnecessary use of ventilators and “vaccines,” closure of Churches, schools, and businesses, draconian lockdowns, coerced vaccinations, etc.) but the attempt at legalizing the act may prevent future legal action.
While the Justice Department in the U.S. has shown itself to be corrupt, those employees may eventually get replaced, and future employees may not be as lenient with the establishment – even future liberal Justice Department employees might be perturbed by the terrorism caused by a falsified pandemic and the harm it may have caused. But legalizing a falsified pandemic may provide some legal coverage in the future for those involved.
That is, of course, if COVID-19 is a falsified pandemic. The aforementioned discussion would be a moot point if the COVID-19 pandemic is real.
But as one studies the paper trails leading up to COVID-19 and soon thereafter while keeping in mind several factors which are unlikely to be explained as merely coincidence, one may be increasingly convinced that COVID-19 may be a partially or completely falsified pandemic “operational exercise,” “exercise program,” or something similar.
And, believe it or not, there is still more information supporting that claim, but it will not be mentioned here.
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Big Tech Fails to Suppress Criticism of Fauci Puff Piece Documentary That Demonizes Infowars
Infowars.com
October 11th 2021, 3:28 pm
Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/big-...ff-piece-documentary-that-demonizes-infowars/
Infowars anti-Fauci and Bill Gates gear seen in widely-ridiculed establishment National Geographic biopic about Dr. Fauci.
Big Tech platforms have completely failed to suppress the widespread criticism of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s upcoming documentary despite their best efforts.
The NIAID Director and White House Covid response adviser’s biopic “Fauci” promotes him as the savior of mankind who delivered humanity from COVID – a virus he himself helped create through government funding – despite opposition from Americans protesting medical tyranny.
The “Fauci” trailer is heavily ratio’d on YouTube despite the establishment’s best efforts to suppress criticism of the White House Covid adviser.
For example, Rotten Tomatoes had initially prevented users from rating the documentary on its platform.
But after swift online backlash, the film critique website finally relented and allowed an audience rating, which turned out to be even more embarrassing for Fauci and his establishment cheerleaders, who gave the documentary a 91% rating.
IMDB, the premiere online movie database, also has a 1.5/10 user rating for “Fauci” as of this writing.
Notably, the trailer opens with scenes of anti-Fauci protesters prominently wearing Infowars gear, including our “Arrest Fauci & Gates” t-shirt — only available at the Infowars Store – in an effort to portray peaceful protesters as domestic terrorists, which the Biden administration has already done.
A leftist who promotes Fauci’s medical tyranny hostage takeover has removed a tweet of herself skydiving after she realized the man in whom she entrusted her life was wearing an ‘Arrest Fauci’ Infowars sticker on his helmet.
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
EXPOSED: Emails show Fauci funded training at Wuhan’s most deadly lab
October 15, 2021 1 Comment FacebookLink: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2021/10/exposed-emails-show-fauci-funded.html
Another bombshell has been dredged up from the email archives of Tony Fauci, whom we now know funneled American taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) via the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The National Pulse found that Fauci gave cash to the Chinese lab to help train employees in how to handle the many coronaviruses that have been tampered with at the facility over the years, including the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).
The Galveston National Laboratory (GNL), which describes itself as “constructed under grants awarded by [Fauci’s] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),” partnered up with the Chinese Communist Party-run institute to bring the Fauci Flu and other scamdemic viruses into existence.
A 2017 email exchange between Fauci and GNL exposes director James LeDuc confirming the existence of his Fauci-funded lab’s partnership with the WIV, which was China’s only known level-four biosafety lab at the time.
“In brief, the e-mail shows Fauci’s funding of GNL via NIAID was going directly towards training Chinese BSL4 staff,” The National Pulse reported.
On Oct. 31, 2017, LeDuc sent an email to Fauci with the subject line “China BSL4 labs” that reminded him about how the two had previously conversed “regarding collaborations with the new Chinese [biosafety level 4] labs.”
One of the labs referenced by LeDuc was the “Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan BSL4), along with two others, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Kunming BSL4) and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Harbin BSL4).
“Each of these labs has been constructed and they are about to begin operations,” LeDuc added, revealing that there are, in fact, multiple level-four biosafety labs in China now.
“The directors of each of these 3 new labs have agreed to come to Galveston, as has George Gao (if his schedule permits) and about 6-8 other accomplishes [sic] Chinese scientists.”
With money from Fauci, LeDuc taught Chinese researchers “practices in safety and security”
LeDuc went on to invite Fauci to come join the party. After all, Fauci funded it, so it was only natural for LeDuc to ask Fauci if he wanted to see the product of his treason.“The meeting will focus on a balance of science and operations with the goal of building collaborations and ensuring that the new labs are exposed to U.S. best practices in safety and security,” the email went on to state.
“I’m wondering if you would be interested in joining us.”
LeDuc further revealed that certain “important leaders of China” would be attending, which made it “a good opportunity” for Fauci to “meet and interact” with them.
“We expect about 10-12 senior Chinese and a comparable number of senior U.S. scientists from outside UTMB, plus several UTMB folks,” the email went on to state.
“I will be hosting a dinner at our home on Tuesday evening to facilitate informal discussions. Let me know if you’re interested and we can work to accommodate your schedule – again, no pressure. Happy to chat if you like.”
Fauci proceeded to forward that email to another contact called “NIAID OD AM,” the body of which read “Let us discuss.”
The following day, Fauci responded directly to LeDuc thanking him for the invitation but declining due to “scheduling conflicts.” At no point did Fauci express any concern whatsoever about the program.
UNC’s Ralph Baric visited Fauci-funded Chinese lab containing “world’s most dangerous pathogens”
It was later revealed from the presentations that took place at the Texas-based lab event that researchers were being cross-trained to handle the “world’s most dangerous pathogens” at the WIV. One of these researchers was Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who visited the China-based lab personally.Baric, as we have been reporting, is a strong proponent of gain-of-function research, which Fauci was illegally funding with American taxpayer dollars. Even though the technique is extremely dangerous, Baric has called it “a crucial tool” for whatever it is that he and his ilk are trying to do.
Gain-of-function research, in case you missed it, involves tampering with deadly pathogens in such a way as to make them transmissible between species. One example is SARS-CoV-2, which was genetically engineered (GMO) to make it infectious in humans as well as bats.
Baric was also connected to Chinese coronavirus researcher Shi “bat woman” Zhengli, who we now know carried out the deadly research that brought SARS-CoV-2 into existence.
Fauci continues to deny any involvement in the program, even though these and other emails, as well as hordes of other evidence, incriminate him as one of the ringleaders who made it all happen — with American taxpayer dollars.
“Fraudski is a serial killer,” one Natural News commenter wrote. “He is one of the poorest excuses for a human being that I’ve ever seen.”
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Here's Joe Rogan examining CNN doctor Gupta on subject of vaxxes and covid
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Doctor Reveals Remdesivir Is Real Cause Of COVID-19 Maladies
Published on August 11, 2021Written by James Fetzer
Link: https://principia-scientific.com/doctor-reveals-remdesivir-is-real-cause-of-covid-19-maladies/
Dr. Bryan Ardis makes an astounding revelation. He states that Dr. Fauci pushed the use of Veklury® (remdesivir) as a treatment for COVID-19 knowing that it would be unsafe and ineffective for patients.
Veklury® (remdesivir) is a nucleotide analogue RNA polymerase inhibitor. Dr. Ardis reveals that the symptoms of lungs filling with fluid and the other alleged COVID-19 symptoms were actually side effects of kidney poisoning and other organ damage that are known side-effects of Veklury® (remdesivir). Dr. Ardis alleges that the devestating health toll allegedly caused by COVID-19 was actually caused by the NIH recommended treatment of Veklury® (remdesivir).
Dr. Bryan states that the NIH even cited two studies on its website that showed that Veklury® (remdesivir) was ineffective and unsafe to patients. It seems that many doctors just blindly followed the recommendation of the NIH to use Veklury® (remdesivir) without actually reading the cited studies. I tracked down those studies and read them.
NIH Recommends Remdesivir
On May 12, 2020, the NIH recommended the use of Veklury® (remdesivir) for severe cases of COVID-19. At that time, Veklury® (remdesivir) was an unapproved experimental drug made by Gilead Sciences. It was authorized by the FDA for emergency use treatment of COIVD-19.Conflicts of Interest
In my research I discovered something quite disturbing. The recommendation from the NIH to use Veklury® (remdesivir) to treat COVID-19 came from the NIH Panel on COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. There were nine (9) people on the NIH Panel on COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines with financial ties to Gilead Sciences, the maker of Veklury® (remdesivir).The following is a list of those people on the NIH Panel on COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines who had financial ties to Gilead Sciences, the manufacturer of Veklury® (remdesivir):
Steering Doctors Away From Hydroxychloroquine
The panel tried to steer doctors away from Hydroxychloroquine, by stating that “[t]here are insufficient clinical data to recommend either for or against using chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID.”The panel, of course, had an interest in undermining inexpensive and effective treatements: “[T]he Panel recommends against the use of the following drugs for the treatment of COVID-19: The combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin because of the potential for toxicities.” That was not true. Indeed many subsequent studies have shown that the hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin “combination is safe and may avoid worsening, virus persistence, and subsequent contagiosity.”
This author previous wrote an article explaining the extreme efforts taken to discredit hydroxychloroquine. Doctors conducting studies purposely administered toxic levels of hydroxychlorquine to falsely show that it was dangerous to patients.
Remdesivir Adverse Events
Many of the studies cited in support of NIH’s recommendation to use Veklury® (remdesivir) were in vitro studies or animal studies. A couple of the human studies were at best a mixed bag. Two of the most authoritative studies showed Veklury® (remdesivir) to be ineffective and unsafe.On or about May 12, 2020, the FDA reported the following summary for study GS-US-5773:
Please do not miss the fact that there were reported 71 percent adverse events in the 5-day study and 74 percent adverse events in the 10-day study for patients taking Veklury® (remdesivir). 21 percent suffered serious adverse events in the 5 day study and 35 percent of the patients suffered serious adverse events in the 10-day study. Below is the chart of adverse events published in the study.
Hiding Remdesivir Adverse Events
This is where it gets deceptive. In a later published fact sheet dated October 2020, the FDA provided the following summary of that same study:Notice the differences in reporting. The May 2020 report describes adverse events, whereas the October 2020 report changes the reporting to adverse reactions.
The difference is that an adverse reaction denotes a causal relationship and an adverse event is an event that may or may not be causally related.
A reaction is sometimes defined as the response to a medication where that response is at least resonably possible to have been caused by the medication.
By concealing the adverse events and only reporting adverse reactions, the October 2020 FDA report conceals the real danger from Veklury® (remdesivir). Keep in mind that an adverse reaction must be established by a reasonable possibility. Such nebulous standards for distinguishing adverse events from adverse reactions are ripe for abuse. An adverse event could be causally related but the reviewer may just decide it is not reasonable to infer it is causally linked, and thus it would not be called an adverse reaction.
This is where the deception becomes obvious. The study did not measure aderse reactions! The study protocols for GS-US-540-5773 published by Gilead states that they were only going to measure adverse events. There is no mention of any plan to measure advers reactions.
Indeed, when one read the data from the Gilead study (GS-US-540-5773) itself there is only a recording of adverse events. There is no measure or memorialization of adverse reactions. So, the question is, if Gilead did not plan to measure adverse reactions and there is no record of such measures, where did the adverse reaction figures come from?
Majority of Patients on Remdesivir Suffer Liver Damage
Amazingly, in the May 2020 FDA publication indicated that a majority of the participants in the several remdesivir studies conducted have suffered liver damage.Transaminase elevations have been observed in the remdesivir clinical development program, including in healthy volunteers and patients with COVID19. In healthy volunteers who received up to 150 mg daily for 14 days, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were observed in the majority of patients, including elevations to up to 10 times baseline values in one subject without evidence of clinical hepatitis.
The FDA report stated that in the GS-US-540-5773 study 5 percent of the patients suffered moderate to severe liver damage. Whereas, 2 percent of the study patients suffered severe liver damage.
Kidney Damage From Remdesivir is Foreseeable
Another foreseeable side effect of Veklury® (remdesivir) is kidney damage. The FDA pubication reveals that “ntravenous administration (slow bolus) of remdesivir to rats at dosage levels of =3 mg/kg/day for up to 4 weeks resulted in findings indicative of kidney injury and/or dysfunction.”Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Required
In another later published study (ACTT-1, NCT04280705) reported in the October 10, 2010 FDA emergency use auhthorization that alleged to show the benefits of Veklury® (remdesivir), 27 percent of the patients taking Veklury® (remdesivir) “were on invasive mechanical ventilation.” There was no control group in that study. It seems that the ventilation was the result of Veklury® (remdesivir) because the study revealed that “Early Study Termination Due to Adverse Events
In another human study conducted in China, 12 percent of the Veklury® (remdesivir) group participants had to discontinue therapy with Veklury® (remdesivir) due to adverse side effects. That compared to 5 percent in the control group.Keep in mind that the control group in the chineses study was not truly a placebo group and the Veklury® (remdesivir) group was not truly a Veklury® (remdesivir) group. Both the control group and the Veklury® (remdesivir) group recieved corticosteroids, lopinavir/ritonavir, and interferon alfa-2b. The study was terminated early without any conclusions. The NIH admitted that “[t]he use of concomitant medications (corticosteroids, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon) may have obscured the effects of remdesivir.”
Another human study cited did not have a control group, and the NIH, therefore, admitted that “it is not possible to assess whether the use of remdesivir led to the improvement.”
Remdesivir Proven Ineffective in Ebola Study
There was only one other human study cited, and the results were devastating for the patients in that study who were administered Veklury® (remdesivir). In that study, Veklury® (remdesivir) was compared to three other treatments for Ebola. The control group was not actually a placebo group. The group was administered a medicine identified as ZMapp (a triple monoclonal antibody agent).There was something strange about the trial. In another trial study 22% of the study patients died within 28 days using ZMapp on patients with Ebola. But in the comparative study with Veklury® (remdesivir) the motrality rate for the control grup using ZMapp shot up to 49.7% during the 28 day study.
The study administrators could only guess as to why their study patients were dropping like flies. They said: “The reason that mortality among patients who received ZMapp was 22% in the PREVAIL II trial (conducted during the outbreak in West Africa) and 50% in our trial (conducted during the current outbreak in the DRC) is unclear.”
One thing that was clear was that the significantly higher mortality for ZMapp brought the control group closer to the 53.1% mortality rate of the Veklury® (remdesivir) group with the effect that Veklury® (remdesivir) was shown to be merely less effective rather than extremely deleterious. That higher mortality of 49.7% for ZMapp also had the effect of showing that the other two treatment modalities were effective as compared to the control.
In any event, as the chart published in the study below reveals, Veklury® (remdesivir) had the highest mortality of any of the treatment modalities with 53.1 percent of the Ebola patients who were administered Veklury® (remdesivir) dying within 28 days.
Yet, with those studies showing the Veklury® (remdesivir) is unsafe and ineffective, the NIH recommended Veklury® (remdesivir) as the treatment for COVID-19. The results were foreseeable. Its use to treat patients with COVID-19 were predictably ineffective and unsafe.
See more here: jamesfetzer.org
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Fauci 'did more damage to this nation than anyone this side of the Bat Lady of Wuhan' and went behind Trump's back to lift the ban on gain-of-function research, ex-aide Peter Navarro claims
STATION GOSSIP 08:28 News Edit this postLink: http://www.stationgossip.com/2021/11/fauci-did-more-damage-to-this-nation.html
Peter Navarro said in a new book coming out this week that Dr. Anthony Fauci damaged the U.S. and former President Donald Trump mo...
Cops ‘Laughed’ When Biden Staffers Called 911 for Trump Train Ambush: Lawsuit97-Year-Old Billionaire Doubles Down on Windowless Mega-Dorm Vanity ProjectPeter Navarro said in a new book coming out this week that Dr. Anthony Fauci damaged the U.S. and former President Donald Trump more than 'the Bat Lady of Wuhan.'
The former Trump economic adviser is referring to Shi Zhengli, a Chinese virologist who researches SARS coronaviruses originating from bats at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where COVID-19 is thought to have originally leaked from.
Navarro writes: Dr. Fauci did 'more damage to this nation, President Trump and the world than anyone else this side of the Bat Lady of Wuhan.'
In the book, the ex-Trump aide holds Fauci accountable for 'everything from the Wuhan lab gain-of-function catastrophe and suppression of low-cost therapeutics such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to the political, partisan and deadly delay in delivering the Trump vaccines to the American people.'
'In Trump Time, A Journal of America's Plague Year' will become widely available on Tuesday.
According to the New York Post, the book takes aim at Fauci, who served as a chief medical adviser to both President Trump and current President Joe Biden.
Fauci's wrongdoings, according to Navarro, included not telling Trump or the coronavirus task force that he knew the lab in Wuhan was conducting gain of function research on bat coronaviruses.
The top immunologist at the National Institutes of Health has come under fire from Republicans for allegedly lying about his agency funding this research at the lab in China.
Fauci, Navarro writes, 'went behind the back of the Trump White House in 2017 to lift the ban on dangerous 'gain-of-function' experiments.'
'It was Fauci's agency,' he continues, 'that helped fund and orchestrate such… experiments at a bioweapons lab in Wuhan, China, where the pandemic almost certainly originated. And it was Fauci who, as we now know from a trove of emails, was being told as early as January 31, 2020, that the virus was likely engineered.'
Navarro also said in his book that Fauci was vehemently against restricting travel from China at the onset of the pandemic when President Trump and some of his aides recommended it before the virus hit the U.S.
The economic adviser claimed that during a Situation Room meeting on January 27, 2020 the doctor said: 'In my experience, travel restrictions don't work.'
A harsh and repeated critic of Fauci is Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul, an ophthalmologist by trade before becoming a senator.
Paul has often gotten into heated and public arguments with Fauci over gain of function research and whether the U.S. funded this type of project in Wuhan that ultimately led to the lab leak that caused the coronavirus pandemic.
The two have even gotten into spats over the definition of the term gain of function, which is a medical research ability that looks to genetically alter the way organisms process viruses.
Specifically in this sense, they are talking about genetically altering a virus to be able to jump from bats to humans and be more deadly or effective in humans.
An October poll shows that confidence in Fauci is dwindling.
The Rasmussen Reports survey taken toward the end of last month shows 49 per cent of American voters think that Fauci is lying about funding gain of function research in China.
Another 33 per cent believe Fauci has told the truth while almost a fifth of respondents – 19 per cent – say they aren't sure.
The figure has declined 7 per cent from a June poll, where 40 per cent said they believed Fauci had told the truth.
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Fauci exposed as conspirator in smearing fellow scientists
Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Project Veritas releases military documents that contradict Fauci’s sworn testimony on gain of function research
by The Post MillennialJanuary 11th 2022, 7:50 am
Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/proj...sworn-testimony-on-gain-of-function-research/
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, proceeded with the research at the Wuhan Virology Lab in China and at several sites other across the US.
Project Veritas released documents Monday night which appear to contradict NIH Director Dr. Anthony Fauci’s sworn testimony regarding gain of function research.
The documents come from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which were allegedly hidden in a top secret shared drive.
DARPA facilitates research in technology with potential military applications under the US Department of Defense
Project Veritas has obtained a report which stated that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, looking to obtain funding for Project Defuse to conduct gain of function research of coronaviruses from bats.
According to Project Veritas, the proposal was rejected by DARPA because it violated a gain of function research moratorium. Additionally, there were safety concerns.
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, proceeded with the research at the Wuhan Virology Lab in China and at several sites other across the US.
Fauci has repeated under oath during multiple Congressional hearings that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program.
According to Project Veritas, “The report goes on to detail concern regarding the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines.”
DARPA’s Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, told Project Veritas when asked about the secrecy surrounding the documents, “It doesn’t sound normal to me. If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked. I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space.”
According to Project Veritas, “The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now.”