Upd: Elder Bundy is arrested upon arriving in Oregon, now charged w. fed offenses for events of 2014, continuing civil war by globalist-satanists

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
Oregon standoff: Cliven Bundy faces six federal charges over 2014 confrontation

Link: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/11/cliven-bundy-arrested-charges-oregon-milita-standoff

Cliven Bundy’s arrest is a stunning turn in the 41-day Oregon militia standoff, and a two-decades-long dispute over illegal grazing of cattle on federal land

Cliven Bundy is accused of a string of offenses, including conspiracy to commit an offense against the US. Photograph: John Locher/AP

Julia Carrie Wong and Sam Levin in San Francisco and Matthew O Berger in Portland
Thursday 11 February 2016 17.07 EST Last modified on Thursday 11 February 2016 20.14 EST

Cliven Bundy, the father of Malheur national wildlife refuge occupiers Ammon and Ryan Bundy, has been charged with six federal crimes stemming from his confrontation with the federal government in 2014.

The charges, filed on the same day that the final four occupiers of Malheur surrendered to law enforcement officials and one day after his arrest in Portland, Oregon, marked a stunning turn in a two-decades-long dispute over Bundy’s illegal grazing of cattle on federal land.

The 69-year-old Nevada rancher shuffled into US District Court looking noticeably tired. Bundy had spent Wednesday night in the same downtown Portland jail in which his sons Ammon and Ryan have been held since being arrested by FBI agents on 26 January. He was arrested in Portland after flying in from Nevada, en route to the refuge.

Bundy had remained free for nearly two years after he engaged in an armed standoff with the federal government, angering many. The public interest group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility has tried to put pressure on the US attorney to file charges in the case in order to dissuade other anti-government activists from engaging in similar activities.

He is accused of conspiracy to commit an offense against the US; assault on a federal officer with a deadly weapon; use and carry of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence; interference with commerce by extortion; obstruction of the administration of justice; and aiding and abetting.

Like his sons and their compatriots in their initial hearings a few weeks earlier, the elder Bundy wore a light blue prison jumpsuit with faded pink undershirt, sandals and a chain around his ankles. He sat down and put on a pair of glasses and, for more than 30 minutes, he nodded along as Ruben Iñiguez, an attorney from the federal public defenders’ office, leafed through the 32-page indictment and spoke in the defendant’s ear.

Just after 2pm, Judge Janice Stewart emerged and, just ten minutes later, the hearing was over.

In those ten minutes, Stewart set the dates for a bail hearing on Tuesday at 1.30 pm and a preliminary hearing on Friday 19 February.

The judge also strongly urged the outspoken Bundy not talk about the case with anyone aside from his attorney, as anything said outside the protection of attorney-client privileges “can be used against you by the government.” Asked whether he understood, Bundy said, in a soft and gravelly voice, “yes.” It was the only word he said in court.

The court also learned from public defender Ruben Iñiguez that Bundy’s blood pressure is “quite high, dangerously so” — 188 over 122. Iñiguez said his client had prescription medicine in a carry-on bag and asked the court to locate and return the medications to Bundy.

But Judge Janice Stewart said the normal protocol was for the defendant to be checked out by a physician in prison and obtain any necessary medication through them. Iñiguez countered that the medicines in the bag would speed up the prescription-writing process, but Stewart said she would stick with the protocol.

Stewart also said the court would need to determine whether he had the finances to pay for his own attorney or be allowed to continue with a court-appointed one.

Bundy had left Nevada on Wednesday evening to travel to Oregon after learning that the FBI was moving to end the Malheur occupation. Though his son Ammon had pleaded with the final standouts to surrender, Cliven Bundy remained intransigent, telling the Guardian that he was “taking control of things”.

“I don’t know whether I’ll be a negotiator or maybe a demander,” he told the Guardian by phone on Wednesday night, as he prepared to travel to Oregon. “I hope I save some lives, for one thing.”

Briana Bundy, wife of Cliven’s son Mel Bundy, criticized federal prosecutors for going after the family patriarch for a standoff that happened in 2014. “If they have something to charge him with, why didn’t they do it two years ago?” she said, adding of the accusations. “They are all bogus, and it’s nonsense.”

Briana said the government’s case was weak. “It’s their job to prove guilt, not our job to prove innocence.” The family was trying to figure out what their next step would be, Briana continued. “We’re stressed out and we have a lot of things to get accomplished,” she said, adding: “We’re planning on staying the course.”

Cliven Bundy’s dispute with the federal government dates to 1993, when Bundy began to graze his cattle on public land while “knowingly refus[ing]” to pay fees or obtain the proper permits, according to the complaint. The fees were reportedly as low as $1.35 per cow per month.

In 1998, a federal court ordered Bundy to remove his cattle and began levying fines against him, but the situation did not come to a head until more than a decade later, when the US Bureau of Land Management made plans to seize 1,000 of Bundy’s cattle.

According to the complaint, the BLM made arrangements for the cattle to be impounded and auctioned, but were stymied when Bundy conspired to “impede, obstruct and interfere” with the operation.

That interference played out on national television, as Bundy recruited hundreds of armed sympathizers to descend on the ranch and protect the cattle from impoundment. The complaint describes the standoff as “a massive armed assault against federal law enforcement officers in and around Bunkerville, Nevada, in order to extort the officers” into releasing 400 seized cattle.

The complaint refers specifically to the events of 12 April 2014, when Bundy allegedly directed his supporters in a planned assault on the corralled cattle, describing how the group divided in two in order to distract law enforcement agents in one area while sending another group to attack law enforcement’s “most vulnerable point”.

The group allegedly “took tactically superior positions on high ground”, with some gunmen assuming “sniper positions behind concrete barriers, their assault rifles aimed directly at officers below”. The group is also accused of using unarmed protesters as “human shields” to hide the activity of armed protesters.

The tactics of Bundy’s followers were successful. Law enforcement officers found themselves outnumbered and outmatched, and abandoned the cattle.

The complaint details how Bundy and four unnamed co-conspirators worked together to recruit the supporters who massed on the Bundy ranch in 2014, using the internet to disseminate messages to a network of like-minded people, some of which were false and designed to inflame the passions of rightwing activists.

On 8 April 2014, for example, Bundy allegedly broadcast messages on the internet stating that the federal government had surrounded his house with snipers and officers armed with assault rifles.

Though law enforcement retreated after the 12 April standoff, the complaint alleges that criminal activity in the form of employing bodyguards and thwarting the impoundment of the cattle continued up until Bundy’s arrest and charge.

Baily Logue, Cliven’s 24-year-old daugher, told the Guardian: “Anytime anyone speaks out against the federal government, we are taken down, put into jail and detained … But we’re not backing down, and this is not going to make us any weaker at all. This is only making us stronger.”
 
Last edited:
Re: Elder Bundy is arrested upon arriving in Oregon, now charged w. fed offenses for events of 2014

Cliven Bundy Charged With Conspiracy. What About the Court Charge of Conspiracy by BLM?

Written by William F. Jasper

Link: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...t-about-the-court-charge-of-conspiracy-by-blm

Cliven Bundy Charged With Conspiracy. What About the Court Charge of Conspiracy by BLM?

Nevada Rancher Cliven Bundy (shown), arrested Wednesday night at the Portland International Airport, was charged with multiple felony counts in a federal criminal complaint filed yesterday in federal court. Bundy, father of Ammon and Ryan Bundy, leaders of the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge near Burns, Oregon, is accused of a series of crimes pertaining to the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff against the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), to wit:

• conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States

• assault on a federal law enforcement officer

• carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence (2 counts)

• obstruction of justice

• interference with commerce by extortion

Prosecutors say that, if convicted, Bundy, 69, could face up to 42 years in prison and up to $1.5 million in fines. Ammon Bundy, 40, and Ryan Bundy, 43, were arrested on January 26, at the same time and at the same FBI/Oregon State Police roadblock incident in which fellow refuge occupier LaVoy Finicum, an Arizona rancher, was shot and killed. According to the FBI/OSP account of the shooting, Finicum was shot because he was reaching for a loaded gun in his pocket. However, the only eyewitnesses who have spoken out thus far, other than the law enforcement spokesmen, are two women who were in Finicum’s vehicle at the time of the shooting, and both say LaVoy Finicum was shot while unarmed, with his hands in the air. (See here and here.)

Conspiracy vs. Conspiracy

It is not surprising that the left-dominated “mainstream” media have uniformly supported the federal government’s jihad against the Bundys, the Hammonds, the Hages, and other western ranchers, portraying the BLM and Forest Service as guardians of the “public lands,” while ranchers, farmers, miners, and loggers are caricatured as rapacious destroyers.

The major media have also been reliable propagators of the “welfare rancher” meme of the radical environmental groups and the federal agencies. NPR, for instance, in a February 12 article on Cliven Bundy’s arrest, states that “Bundy owes the federal Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, more than $1 million in leases and fines.” This oft-reported charge, is sometimes inflated to $1.5 million or $2 million. Similarly, The Oregonian reported on February 11 that “Bundy owes the agency $1 million in unpaid fees and penalties.” However, in a previous article, a different writer for The Oregonian had challenged the BLM’s exorbitant claims and pointed out that the agency refused to divulge how it had arrived at its calculations.

In an article entitled, “BLM won't back up claim rancher Cliven Bundy owes $1 million” Oregonian staff writer Les Zaitz reported that “BLM officials say [Bundy] kept $1 million he owes for grazing without permits.” “But that sum is unproven,” noted Zaitz, “and the agency's diligence in collecting any sum from Bundy is questionable.” The Oregonian story continued:

Bundy told The Oregonian Thursday he doesn't owe anything. And one more thing: "I've never been billed."

The BLM's public pronouncement about the debt led to head scratching among Oregon cattle ranchers, puzzled how one rancher could rack up and then evade such a debt. The BLM, which manages about one-fourth of Oregon's acreage, diligently collects fees from ranchers around the state. The total outstanding debt from Oregon ranchers in April was $18,759.

BLM officials, however, have repeatedly refused to document the basis for their $1.1 million claim and initially wouldn't say a word about its attempts to collect the debt.

According to Zaitz, “Bundy is suspicious about the figure. He said agency officials were publicly saying he owed $300,000 in fees in the weeks leading up to the confrontation.” “BLM is keeping secret how the $1 million was calculated,” The Oregonian reported.

In addition, many other unsavory facts began coming out about the BLM’s actions in the Bundy case. “The agency's stature earned another black eye last week from the Nevada sheriff who initially agreed to help BLM gather up Bundy's cattle,” The Oregonian reported. “Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie said in interviews with Las Vegas newspapers last week that the BLM lied to him about circumstances of the cattle roundup. He said agency officials told him Bundy's sons weren't in the area when in fact they were. He said he was told the agency had a place to store the cattle when it didn't.”

BLM critics says this is standard operating procedure for the Bureau of Lying Miscreants. They point to, among many other pieces of evidence, the harsh rulings against the BLM and USFS by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones of the Federal District Court of Nevada, especially in the case of Nevada rancher Wayne Hage, which we have quoted many times, but which have been ignored by the major media.

As we reported previously:

Chief Judge Robert C. Jones of the Federal District Court of Nevada issued a blistering decision that charged officials of the BLM and other agencies with malicious and criminal conduct, and actually engaging in a decades-long “conspiracy” against the Hages.

Judge Jones said he found that “the government and the agents of the government in that locale, sometime in the ’70s and ’80s, entered into a conspiracy, a literal, intentional conspiracy, to deprive the Hages of not only their permit grazing rights, for whatever reason, but also to deprive them of their vested property rights under the takings clause, and I find that that’s a sufficient basis to hold that there is irreparable harm if I don’t ... restrain the government from continuing in that conduct.”

"In the present case,” declared Judge Jones, “the Government's actions over the past two decades shock the conscience of the Court."

The findings of Judge Jones in the Hage case should be borne in mind as tensions mount in Clark County, where the actions of the BLM are shocking the conscience of the entire nation….

While sympathetic to and supportive of the Bundys and other family farmers and ranchers who are being subjected to illegal and unconscionable actions by federal “public servants,” The New American magazine and this writer have not been advocates of all the actions and tactics chosen by the Bundys and their supporters, in either the Nevada or Oregon standoffs.

However, as we predicted in 2014, lawlessness and tyrannical abuse on the part of federal agencies would inevitably lead to more desperate property owners choosing confrontation to capitulation and ruin. “We’re friends with the Hages and we supported them,” Cliven Bundy told this reporter in 2014, “But look what happened to them. They fought the Forest Service and BLM in the courts for years and decades and won ruling after ruling. They exposed the criminal actions of the government. And every time they won the government — using their own money against them — appeals and delays and appeals and delays, and ignores the judge’s injunctions. They have all the resources and can just wear you down. It’s corrupt, and its impossible to get justice, and that’s why we say we have to fix it according to the Constitution, which says (Article 1, Section 8) the federal government isn’t even supposed to have the land, it belongs to the states and to the people.”

Photo of Cliven Bundy: AP Images

Related articles:

Oregon Standoff: BLM’s “Burn ‘Em Out” Legacy — The Untold Backstory

Oregon Standoff: Nevada Rancher Cliven Bundy Arrested, Occupiers Surrender

Family, Second Witness Say LaVoy Finicum Was “Murdered”

FBI Release of Rancher Shooting Video: More Questions Than Answers

The Federal Bootprint

Behind the Oregon Standoff

Enviro Extremists Call for Shooting Ranchers’ Cattle

Victims of the Federal Bootprint

Is Cliven Bundy a “Racist”? Where’s the PROOF?

Last Man Standing: Nevada Ranch Family in Fedgov Face-off

Judge Blasts Federal Conspiracy; Ranch Family Vindicated — Again!
 
Re: Elder Bundy is arrested upon arriving in Oregon, now charged w. fed offenses for events of 2014

Clive Bundy Indicted on 16 Counts for 2014 Ranch Incident

Clive Bundy was charged with 16 additional counts on Wednesday for the 2015 Nevada Ranch Standoff Incident.

Link: http://www.newsfoxes.com/2016/02/clive-bundy-indited-on-16-counts-for-2014-ranch-incident/

By Hannibal Smith -
February 18, 2016

The aftermath of the Oregon Militia standoff seems to keep getting worse. Clive Bundy has now been indicted on 16 counts for his involvement in the 2014 armed standoff against federal authorities. He was indicted by a federal grand jury on Wednesday for conspiracy, assault on a federal officer, and obstruction of justice.

“Persons who use force and violence against federal law enforcement officers who are enforcing court orders, and nearly causing catastrophic loss of life or injury to others, will be brought to justice.” U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden

Prosecutors claimed Bundy had trespassed on federal public lands for over 20 years. They claim he refused to secure the necessary permits or pay the required fees the government charges ranchers to let their cattle roam. Armed rangers were sent to round up his cattle, however Bundy supporters rallied and after an armed standoff the feds backed down citing safety concerns.

Protesters gather at the Bureau of Land Management's base camp, where the cattle that were seized from rancher Cliven Bundy are being held, near Bunkerville, Nevada April 12, 2014. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management on Saturday said it had called off an effort to round up Bundy's herd of cattle that it had said were being illegally grazed in southern Nevada, citing concerns about safety. The conflict between Bundy and U.S. land managers had brought a team of armed federal rangers to Nevada to seize the 1,000 head of cattle. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart (UNITED STATES - Tags: ANIMALS CIVIL UNREST AGRICULTURE CRIME LAW TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Pete Santilli, Ryan Payne, and Ammon Bundy were also charged for participating in the Nevada standoff, according to a statement released by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Nevada. They were charged with conspiracy, carrying a firearm in relation to a violent crime, obstruction of justice, extortion, and assault and threats against federal law enforcement.
 
Re: Elder Bundy is arrested upon arriving in Oregon, now charged w. fed offenses for events of 2014

Bundy refuses in court to recognize US authority in Nevada

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/cliven-bundy-court-appearance-draw-demonstrators-vegas-071200283.html

KEN RITTER,Associated Press 3 hours ago .

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Jailed Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy refused Thursday to acknowledge federal authority and declined to enter a plea to federal charges that he led an armed standoff against a round-up of cattle two years ago.

After several minutes of confusion about whether Bundy had a lawyer, U.S. Magistrate Judge Carl Hoffman entered a not guilty plea on Bundy's behalf and scheduled a detention hearing March 17.

Arguments then will focus on whether the 69-year-old Bundy should remain in custody pending trial on 16 charges, including conspiracy, assault and threatening a federal officer, obstruction and firearms offenses.

It could be many months before trial. Federal prosecutor Steven Myhre told the judge the case involving 19 defendants would be slow-tracked as "complex."

"I make no plea before this court," Bundy said, standing in a courtroom full of family members, friends, media, court officials and U.S. marshals.

Bundy wore a maroon-colored Henderson city jail uniform, with his ankles shackled and his hands free during the 15-minute hearing. He waved before the hearing to his wife, Carol Bundy, and several adult children and supporters among about 40 people in the courtroom audience.

Joel Hansen, a Nevada attorney who has represented property rights advocates in a number of cases in the state, served as Bundy's attorney. But Hansen told the judge that Bundy plans to get another lawyer for trial.

Hansen said Bundy's refusal to enter a plea was a statement that he couldn't have done anything wrong because federal law doesn't apply.

Bundy has consistently denied U.S. government authority over rangeland around his 160-acre cattle ranch and melon farm in Bunkerville, about 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas.

Federal BLM officials said in 2014 that he owed more than $1.1 million in fees and penalties for grazing hundreds of cows illegally for about 20 years.

"Mr. Bundy feels like he needs to stand up for the rights of all Americans in all states, and for the states to be the owner of public land and not the federal government," Hansen said outside court. "In the West, the government owns most of the land. He thinks that's wrong."

Bundy's second court appearance in Nevada drew about 100 protesters, including some carrying guns on their hips and others wearing cowboy hats, waving American flags and toting signs calling for Bundy's release. Nevada allows open-carrying of guns.

The scene was peaceful, with chants like "U-S-A!" and "The FBI lied and a man died!" and "Wake up America!" directed toward passing vehicles. The death referred to the fatal shooting on Jan. 26 of Robert "Lavoy" Finicum by Oregon state police.

In Oregon, the Deschutes County sheriff's office released hundreds of pages of documents Thursday including forensic reports and interview transcripts from its investigation of Finicum's death. The 55-year-old from Cane Beds, Arizona, was a key figure in the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

A prosecutor in Oregon determined this week that the shooting was justified. Two officers said they believed Finicum was moments away from drawing his pistol and shooting one of their colleagues.

"I didn't want to wait for him (Finicum) to bring out a firearm, because I knew that by the time that I was able to recognize and deal with it, that he could have very likely shot" the third officer, one state trooper told investigators.

In Las Vegas, uniformed and plainclothes police and U.S. marshals remained largely unseen, but cameras in a conspicuous portable police surveillance tower kept close watch on the demonstration. No arrests were reported.

Jaime Spears, who traveled from St. Augustine, Florida, sold $20 T-shirts bearing the phrase "Whatever it takes." It recalls Bundy's vow to resist a federal Bureau of Land Management round-up of cattle from public rangeland in the protected Gold Butte area around his ranch.

"We're thanking everyone for their support and their prayers," Carol Bundy said on the sidewalk. The mother of 14 maintained the federal government has no jurisdiction to hold her husband and four of her sons, who are among 19 people charged in the April 2014 standoff.

Bundy was arrested Feb. 10 when he arrived at Portland International Airport on his way to visit sons Ammon and Ryan Bundy in jail. They were arrested Jan. 26 on charges that they led a 41-day armed occupation of a federal wildlife refuge near Burns, Oregon. Cliven Bundy was returned last week in custody to Nevada.

Convictions in the case in Las Vegas could result in penalties up to life in prison.
 

Mexican Authorities Target Arizona Rancher Accused of Shooting Illegal Immigrant: Attorney​



By C. Douglas Golden May 2, 2024 at 5:15am

Link: https://www.westernjournal.com/mexi...-accused-shooting-illegal-immigrant-attorney/

[vid at site link, above]

If the Mexican government can’t get a guilty verdict in an American court for the death of an illegal migrant who was allegedly spotted with a group of armed men on private property, its response, apparently, is to target the rancher who shot the migrant — and help sue the pants off of him.

Arizona rancher George Alan Kelly, 75, will not be retried in the death of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea in January of 2023, The Associated Press reported, after a jury deadlocked on charges of second-degree murder and aggravated assault. The charges were dismissed by Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink on Monday after he declared a mistrial April 22.

According to The New York Times, Brenna Larkin, an attorney for Kelly, said that jurors were deadlocked 7-1 in favor of a not-guilty verdict.

“Because of the unique circumstances and challenges surrounding this case, the Santa Cruz County Attorney’s Office has decided not to seek a retrial,” Deputy County Attorney Kimberly Hunley told Fink in court on Monday, according to the AP.

Kelly, a cattle rancher who lives near Nogales, Arizona, said he was eating lunch on Jan. 30, 2023, when he saw a group of men crossing his property near his home. The men were armed with rifles, Kelly testified.

The rancher said he fired several warning shots from his rifle over the group of men to scare them off. However, Cuen-Buitimea — who lived just south of the border in Nogales, Mexico, and had been deported from the United States several times, according to the AP, the last time in 2016 — was hit in the back and died when he was hit roughly 100 yards away.

“Mr. Kelly and his wife have been living through a nightmare for over a year, and they can finally rest easy,” Larkin said in a statement, according to Newsweek.

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge via email. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“While that injustice to Gabriel and his family is unfortunate, we are at least pleased to know that the injustice will not be compounded by scapegoating an innocent man.”

Which is why, of course, the top Mexican official in Nogales, Arizona is choosing to scapegoat Kelly.

“This seems to us to be a very regrettable decision,” said Mexican Consul General Marcos Moreno Baez in a statement, according to the AP.

“We will explore other options with the family, including a civil process,” he added.

And, according to NewsNation’s Ali Bradley — who covers the border crisis for the network and is seen interviewing Kelly in the clip above — that’s exactly what they plan to do.

Related:

Watch: 'The View' Ignores the Political Issue That Could Doom Biden's Re-Election Dreams

According to a post on X published late Wednesday night, Bradley said she had learned that “Mexico is now working with Cuen-Buitimea’s family to sue George Alan Kelly according to his attorney, Brenna Larkin.”

In a statement, Larkin condemned the interference of the Mexican government in the case, particularly given the criminal background of the deceased.

“The defense is curious about the Mexican government’s continued involvement in this case, and its attempts to influence judicial proceedings in this case. Myself and my colleagues have represented many different Mexican nationals who have been stuck in custody in the United States,” she said in a statement.

“The Mexican consul general rarely (if ever) reaches out to get involved in their cases.”

Cuen-Buitimea and his group were “clearly involved in criminal activity,” the statement continued.

“Mr. Cuen-Buitimea had previously been deported numerous times from this country. Had he obeyed the law, he would never have been there and he would never have met this end.

“We would hope that the Mexican consul general would encourage their citizens to respect the laws of the United States, just as we encourage our citizens to respect the laws of Mexico. It is unfortunate that Mr. Cuen-Buitimea continued to make the tragic choices that put him in harm’s way, but those were his choices.”

Bradley added that Kelly’s team was exploring its options in regards to suing the government.

Regardless of what happens next, it’s worth noting the hypocrisy at play here.

If this had happened to a Nogales, Arizona, resident who had illegally crossed the border and was shot by a homeowner in Nogales, Mexico — and if there was reasonable suspicion of criminal activity aside from just the illegal border crossing — the Mexican government would be foaming at its collective mouths if there was a peep out of any American official.

It would likely be hours, not days, before the visage of Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador would appear on national television in a conniption, demanding an apology from the highest levels of Washington, D.C., officialdom. It would be an international incident. Vice President Kamala Harris would be shuttled to the Mexican state of Sonora, home of Nogales sur, in order to address the “root causes” of such activity.

But amid a border crisis of record proportions and a not-infrequently deported man who was killed while undertaking illegal activity and trespassing on private property, the Mexican government apparently feels it’s not only in a position to lecture the United States on how its juries and courts rule, but also to help the family of the deceased man target the rancher whose property he was trespassing on.

Mexican officials should not interfere with U.S. courts, period. The fact is that if they had their own border under control, this quite likely never would have happened.

If the dead man’s family members want to sue anyone, maybe they should sue their own government, instead, which refuses to clamp down on illegal immigration even as it strengthens criminal cartels and strains relations between Washington and Mexico City.
 
Back
Top