Corrupt kike AG, Garland, refuses to hand-over Biden tapes w. Hur (prosecutor), launching witch-hunt against "consp.-theorists"

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND TARGETS “CONSPIRACY THEORIES” AFTER LAUNCHING “ELECTION THREATS TASK FORCE” WITH FBI, SPARKING CENSORSHIP CONCERNS​

Published: June 12, 2024

SOURCE: RECLAIM THE NET

Link: https://www.blacklistednews.com/art...er-launching-election-threats-task-force.html

garland-2-scaled.jpg

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Some might see US Attorney General Merrick Garland getting quite involved in campaigning ahead of the November election – albeit indirectly so, as a public servant whose primary concern is supposedly how to keep Department of Justice (DoJ) staff “safe.”
And, in the process, he brings up “conspiracy theorists” branding them as undermining the judicial process in the US – because they dare question the validity of a particular judicial process that aimed at former President Trump.

In an opinion piece published by the Washington Post, Garland used one instance that saw a man convicted for threatening a local FBI office to draw blanket and dramatic conclusions that DoJ staff have never operated in a more dangerous environment, where “threats of violence have become routine.”

It all circles back to the election, and Garland makes little effort to present himself as neutral. Other than “conspiracy theories,” his definition of a threat are calls to defund the department that was responsible for going after the former president.
Ironically, while the tone of his op-ed and the topics and examples he chooses to demonstrate his own bias, Garland goes after those who claim that DoJ is politicized with the goal of influencing the election.

The attorney general goes on to quote “media reports” – he doesn’t say which, but one can assume those following the same political line – which are essentially (not his words) hyping up their audiences to expect more “threats.”
“Media reports indicate there is an ongoing effort to ramp up these attacks against the Justice Department, its work and its employees,” is how Garland put it.

And he pledged that, “we will not be intimidated” by these by-and-large nebulous “threats,” with the rhetoric at that point in the article ramped up to refer to this as, “attacks.”

Garland’s opinion piece is not the only attempt by the DoJ to absolve itself of accusations of acting in a partisan way, instead of serving the interests of the public as a whole.

Thus, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte wrote to House Republicans, specifically House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, to accuse him of making “completely baseless” accusations against DoJ for orchestrating the New York trial of Donald Trump.

While, as it were, protesting too much, (CNBC called it “the fiery reply”) – Uriarte also went for the “conspiracy theory conspiracy theory”:

“The conspiracy theory that the recent jury verdict in New York state court was somehow controlled by the Department is not only false, it is irresponsible,” he wrote.

Garland and FBI Director Chris Wray recently discussed plans to counter election threats during a DoJ Election Threats Task Force meeting. Critics, suspicious of the timing with the upcoming election, cite the recent disbandment of the DHS Intelligence Experts Group.

READ MORE... [see https://reclaimthenet.org/ag-garland-election-threats-task-force-censorship-concerns]

 
Last edited:
Garland's (Jew) corruption at strategic DOJ is strangely under-reported and/or under-stated compared to creepy Joe, but still extremely significant, morons. The treacherous, low-life, lying kike at work, suckas. It's real life, suckas, and how "they" really are. They seem to think Christians are just pathetic push-overs, right?

 
Here's latest events fm the courts on Trump's policies

 
Sup. ct. & congress continue to allow corrupt, criminal, traitor (district) judges to subvert and obstruct Trump's lawful & constitutional admin of executive dept.s

 

WICKED: Democrats Send Out Soulless Hillary to Gaslight Americans that Democrats Are Actually the Victims of Censorship – List Includes Every Single Thing Fascist Left Did to Censor and Silence Republicans​

STATION GOSSIP 09:27

Link: https://www.stationgossip.com/2025/09/wicked-democrats-send-out-soulless.html/

[see vid at site link, above]

Democrats offer nothing but gaslighting, lies, pain and destruction. Democrats believe they have a winning talking point that Republicans ...​


Russian Orthodox Church Honors Charlie Kirk and ‘His Work Against The March of the Destroyer’

WATCH: Trump-Endorsed NJ Gubernatorial Candidate Jack Ciattarelli Flips the Tables on His Democrat Foe With a Brutal Revelation About Her During Heated Debate

hillary-lies-censorship.jpg


Democrats offer nothing but gaslighting, lies, pain and destruction.

Democrats believe they have a winning talking point that Republicans are the party of censorship and suppression in America today.

On Wednesday, the day after Google admitted to censoring and banning conservative content on YouTube, soulless Hillary Clinton went on MSNBC to rant about conservatives censoring liberal voices.

Of course, they don’t even have one legitimate example of this so-called censorship of Democrats but that won’t stop the far left from pushing this brazen lie on the American public.

As The Storm Has Arrived reported, ‘It is mind blowing that the left has the nerve to send Hillary Clinton out there as their mouthpiece and claim that Trump is censoring Americans. After everything they did to silence us, Hillary Clinton goes on TV and lists out everything they did under the Biden administration and claims that it’s what Trump is doing. Astonishing. Direct bullet points from their own playbook.’

Hillary Clinton: “I view it as very dangerous. It is right out of the authoritarian playbook… Silence your opponents. Cripple the media that doesn’t give you the slavish attention and agreement that you desire. Use the power of the government to go after corporations and individuals.”
The projection is at an all time high because they are out of ammunition.

And leftist idiots will believe it. They really are that ignorant.

Via MSNBC.

FYI: Here is a timeline of the censorship by the Democrats and deep state to silence The Gateway Pundit over the years.

Hillary is so full of sh*t.
 
How the Jews-media works--why it's serious CONSPIRACY, the all-time example being the SILENCE about creepy Joe's dementia, suckas (which enabled Jews-media to FURTHER cover-up the "autopen" scandal

 

UK Expands Online Safety Act To Enforce Preemptive Censorship For ‘Priority’ Offenses​

by Cindy Harper | Reclaim The Net October 27th, 2025 5:30 AM

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/uk-e...-preemptive-censorship-for-priority-offenses/

Britain’s push for online "safety" drifts into a realm of digital pre-crime, where algorithms decide guilt before anything gets seen.​


UK Expands Online Safety Act To Enforce Preemptive Censorship For ‘Priority’ Offenses
Image Credit: Lucy North - PA Images / Contributor / Getty

The UK government is preparing to expand the reach of its already controversial censorship law, the Online Safety Act (OSA), with a new set of rules that push platforms toward preemptive censorship.

The changes would compel tech companies to block material before users can even see it, under the claim of stopping “cyberflashing” and content “encouraging or assisting serious self-harm.”

On October 21, the government laid before Parliament a Statutory Instrument titled The Online Safety Act 2023 (Priority Offences) (Amendment) Regulations 2025.

This legal mechanism, used to amend existing legislation without requiring a full new Act, adds two additional “priority offences” to Schedule 7 of the OSA:
By classifying these as “priority illegal content” under Section 59 of the OSA, the government triggers the law’s strictest obligations for online platforms.

Section 10 of the Act lays out the steps companies must take to remain compliant, steps that go far beyond traditional moderation.

Platforms will be required to employ preemptive censorship systems designed to “prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content” and to “mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence.”

In reality, this means social networks, forums, and messaging services will need to automatically block or filter posts that algorithms believe might fall under these categories before they are even visible to the public. This would require increased surveillance of people’s online communication.

They will also have to implement rapid takedown procedures for any content reported by users as potentially illegal.

Failure to comply can result in massive penalties, fines of up to 10% of a company’s global revenue or £18 million ($23M), whichever is greater, and potential service blocking by internet providers.

Such broad obligations virtually guarantee that companies will err on the side of over-censorship.

To avoid multimillion-pound fines, many will likely suppress borderline or even entirely lawful speech.

Automated moderation systems, in particular, are prone to misidentifying context, making it easy to imagine cases where posts offering support or suicide prevention advice could be flagged as “encouraging self-harm.”

What’s emerging is a model of online governance where private platforms are deputized as preemptive censors under threat of severe financial punishment.

While the stated intent may be to protect users from harm, the result is a legal framework that risks silencing legitimate discussion and turning the UK’s digital public square into a heavily filtered environment dictated by government-defined categories of acceptable speech.



Nightmare Bombshell: The Democratic Party Aided and Abetted Mexican Drug Cartels in the Kidnapping of Women, Children, and Babies for Organ Harvesting During the Biden Administration
 
More censorship/cancel-culture, HOW it works

 
How gov. & social order is destroyed by means of censorship, through ct./judicial action or quasi-judicial (through bureaucracy, called "administrative" law).

 
Back
Top