U want socialized-medicine?--gov.-sponsored, financed, "health"-care?--u stupid sucker--they're just going to kill u morons--what u deserve, eh?

[Apollonian]

DEMOCIDE – UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock euthanized masses of elderly people in nursing homes and hospitals​

March 7, 2023 10:33 am by IWB
WEF Matt Hancock

Link: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com...lderly-people-in-nursing-homes-and-hospitals/

More and more of the inconceivable crimes against humanity are coming to light in the UK:
Recently, Maajid Nawaz spoke with UK MP Andrew Bridgen and medical researcher Stuart Wilkie about a very sensitive issue, namely that the UK government, and in particular former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock, euthanized masses of elderly people in nursing homes and hospitals with midazolam and morphine.

This was allegedly done at the height of the “Corona Crisis” so no one would notice. Bridgen raised questions about this. There are also several cases pending.
We are talking about a mass murder of the elderly committed by the government. It is a crime against humanity, democide.
Meanwhile, Hancock is advocating for the legalization of euthanasia. Right.
Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer, is certain that the British government is deliberately killing the elderly. He told Nawaz that midazolam and morphine make breathing difficult.

Yeadon also said the doses given to patients were three to five times higher than the recommended starting dose. He reached for his books on clinical pharmacology and noted that such doses lead to death, especially when administered daily.

See also Exercise more effective than medicines to manage mental health, says study.

“I am personally convinced that the excess mortality in nursing homes can be explained by this treatment,” said Yeadon, who added that it is at least 100,000 people who have been killed by the government.

The important thing about news like this is not to sadly state how many have already been murdered by governments in USA/EU/UK, but that it is possible to be killed at any time while visiting a hospital or doctor on government orders.
That hardly anyone offers resistance against such directives from above, we already know.

See also "We're Dying Slowly": East Palestine Residents Report Bizarre Health Issues After Toxic Train Derailment

Everyone is just doing their job, everyone has bills to pay, many do not want to jeopardize their career or lose their job, many are the sole breadwinner of the family.
There is no more protection for anyone from the mass murderers in the WEF regimes of the West.

 

[Apollonian]

Daily Telegraph: UK Covid Lockdown Health Secretary Matt Hancock ‘Should Be Arrested’​

by Kelen McBreen
March 8th 2023, 2:01 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/dail...th-secretary-matt-hancock-should-be-arrested/

Top health official lied to 'frighten' public, talked about 'deploying' next variant

British newspaper the Daily Telegraph issued a headline Tuesday calling for the arrest of disgraced UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.

“Matt Hancock should be arrested for wilful misconduct in public office,” the paper wrote, citing a recently released trove of over 100,000 private WhatsApp messages revealing the UK government’s Covid discussions.


The article’s author, Allison Pearson, wrote on Twitter Wednesday, “Even at the height of WW2, Government never used propaganda to frighten its own people. This lot did. Kids killed themselves, mental health collapsed. Unforgivable. Matt Hancock should be arrested wilful misconduct in pub office.”

Even at the height of WW2, Government never used propaganda to frighten its own people.
This lot did.
Kids killed themselves, mental health collapsed.
Unforgivable.
Matt Hancock should be arrested wilful misconduct in pub office https://t.co/Npg3nMEqcZ
— Allison Pearson (@AllisonPearson) March 8, 2023

Pearson slammed Hancock for lying about hospitals overflowing with patients in order to “frighten” the public, bringing NHS to its knees due to lockdowns, and “using children with special educational needs as leverage.”

The author also expressed hope Hancock will be brought before a Select Committee, adding, “Personally, I would like to see him in jail for the vast hurt he has caused.”

Continuing, Pearson said she’s aware of care-home resident families planning to use the WhatsApp messages in upcoming lawsuits against the corrupt former UK Health Secretary.

Researcher and lecturer Dr. Eli David accurately highlighted the importance of the Telegraph article in a Twitter post Tuesday, writing, “Today for the first time a major mainstream media (The Telegraph) in a Western country (UK) called for arrest and prosecution of health minister (Matt Hancock) for his Covid crimes. The first domino has fallen.”

Today for the first time a major mainstream media (The Telegraph) in a Western country (UK) called for arrest and prosecution of health minister (Matt Hancock) for his Covid crimes.

The first domino has fallen. pic.twitter.com/fwCJ8p1EzM
— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) March 7, 2023

Time will tell if any political leaders across the globe are actually punished for the deadly scamdemic that wreaked havoc on humanity.

 

[Apollonian]

Conspiracy Theories Become Conspiracy Facts​

Ramesh Thakur
MARCH 9, 2023

Link: https://www.activistpost.com/2023/03/conspiracy-theories-become-conspiracy-facts.html

By Ramesh Thakur
At first slowly but in recent weeks with seemingly gathering pace, two trends have emerged. On the one hand, many of the core claims behind lockdowns, masks, and vaccines are unravelling and the prevailing narrative has been in retreat on all three fronts. But there is still a long way to go, as indicated by the cussed refusal of the Biden administration to let Novak Djokovic play at Indian Wells.
On the other hand, the explosive lockdown files in the UK have blown apart the official narrative. We the sceptics were right in our dark suspicions of the motives, scientific basis, and evidence behind government decisions, but even we did not fully grasp just how venal, evil, and utterly contemptuous of their citizens some of the bastards in charge of our health, lives, livelihoods, and children’s future were. “Hell is empty, And all the devils are here” (Shakespeare, The Tempest) indeed. They will have to build a new circle of hell to accommodate all the perpetrators of evil let loose upon the world since 2020.

A mistake is when you spill coffee or take the wrong exit ramp off the highway. Lockdown was a policy pushed hard by politicians and health chiefs even against scientific dissent and substantial public opposition, using tools from every tyrants’ playbook of disinformation and lies whilst attacking and censoring truth. The depth of public opposition went unrecognized because the fear-peddling media colluded in not reporting on protests.
Genuine mistakes were few and are forgivable. Most were deliberate distortions of reality, outright falsehoods, and a systematic campaign to terrorize people into compliance with arbitrary diktats interspersed with efforts to vilify, silence, and cancel all critics by using the full powers of the state to co-opt, bribe, and bully. All in pursuit of the most maddening public policy insanity of modern times because it ignored existing canons of pandemic planning in blind panic just when calm was most needed. To call lockdown a mistake is to trivialize the shock to society.
Before coming to that, a few preliminary observations to summarize where we are at.

What is Now Known and Generally but Not Universally Admitted​

Covid is now endemic. It will circulate throughout the world and keep returning with mutating variants. People who have been infected and/or vaccinated can contract and transmit it. Consequently we have little choice but to learn to live with it. What is important is to make sure the right policy lessons are learnt so that never again, neither for a novel coronavirus nor for any other infectious disease, do we go down the path of public policy insanity to lock up an entire city or country with the discovery of 1-10 cases and bring all social, cultural and economic activity to a shuddering halt – or give total power and control to sociopaths and psychopaths.

Activist Post is Google-Free
Support us for just $1 per month at Patreon or SubscribeStar​

Meanwhile, what is particularly striking is just how many suspicions voiced by sceptics from early 2020 onwards and mocked as conspiracy theories have turned into plausible claims and accepted facts:

1. The virus may have originated in the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology;
2. Covid modeling was dodgy and dressed up outliers as reasonable case scenarios;
3. Lockdowns don’t work;
4. Lockdowns kill through perverse consequences and inflict other damaging harms, including interruptions to critical life-saving children’s immunization campaigns in developing countries;
5. School closures are particularly bad policy. They did not curb transmission but they did cause long-term harm to children’s education, development and emotional well-being;
6. Masks are ineffective. They stop neither infection nor transmission;
7. Infection confers natural immunity at least as effective as vaccination;
8. Covid vaccines do not stop infection, hospitalization, or even death;
9. Covid vaccines do not stop transmission;
10. The safety of vaccines using new technology had not been definitively established, neither for the short term nor for the long term;
11. Vaccine harms are real and substantial but safety signals have been summarily dismissed and ignored;
12. mRNA vaccines are not confined to the arm but spread rapidly to other parts, including reproductive organs, with potentially adverse consequences for fertility and births;
13. The harm-benefit equation of vaccines is, like the disease burden itself, steeply age-differentiated. Healthy young people did not need either initial or booster doses;
14. Vaccination mandates don’t increase vaccine take-up;
15. Vaccine mandates can fuel cross-vaccine hesitancy;
16. Suppression of sceptical and dissenting voices will lessen trust in public health officials, experts and institutions, and possibly also in scientists more generally;
17. Estimates of “Long Covid” were inflated (CDC estimate of 20 percent of Covid infections against UK study’s estimate of 3 percent) by using generalized, non-specific symptoms like mild fatigue and weakness;
18. Health policy interventions involve policy trade-offs just like all other policy choices. Cost-benefit analysis is therefore an essential prerequisite, not an optional add-on.

The Lockdown Files​

The last three years have seen lives lost in the millions with tens of millions more yet to be accounted for in the coming years, civilized lifestyles destroyed, previously inviolate freedoms shredded, civil liberties turned into privileges to be granted on the whim of bureaucrats, law enforcement officers corrupted into street thugs brutalizing the very people they are sworn to serve and protect, businesses destroyed, economies wrecked, bodily integrity violated.
The Lockdown Files, a treasure trove of over 100,000 WhatsApp messages in real time between all the principal policymakers on Covid in England while Matt Hancock was the Secretary of Health (2020–26 June 2021), offer an unparalleled and gripping window into the amoral and cynical arrogance circulating in the corridors of power. The daily drip-feed of revelations in the Telegraph is akin to watching with fascinated horror a slow-motion train wreck. Schadenfreude doesn’t come any more delicious.
The files are littered with flippant remarks, mocking comments and contempt for citizens. Among the revelations about the Johnson government:

• The government knew there was no “robust rationale” for including children in the “rule of six” (the maximum number of people who could meet at any given time), but backed the controversial policy anyway.
• Facemasks were introduced in secondary schools in England after Johnson was told it was “not worth an argument” with Scotland’s Nicola Sturgeon over the issue, despite England’s Chief Medical Officer (CMO) Chris Whitty saying there were “no very strong reasons” to do so. In other words, political calculations were knowingly prioritized over schoolchildren’s needs.
• A plan to lift restrictions were dropped after Johnson was told it would be “too far ahead of public opinion.”
• Consultants were paid over £1 million a day for more than a year on the totally ineffectual test and trace program, turning the scheme into the embezzlement of public funds to line private pockets.

We now know just how punch drunk on tyranny the political, bureaucratic, scientific, and journalist class was during the pandemic. The ruling elites, when liberated from democratic accountability and media scrutiny, morphed seamlessly into morally cavalier and inhumane petty tyrants. Averse to alternative ways of thinking outside the echo chamber, they developed neuralgia to any idea that might challenge lockdown fanaticism.
Lockdown sceptics like the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) who argued for the elderly and frail to be protected were demonized as dangerous “Covid deniers” who wanted to “let it rip” in a callous and cruel strategy of herd immunity. But government officials whose policies had a direct, catastrophic impact on the health of the elderly and frail were treated as heroes and unimpeachable voices of moral authority.

Sociopath, Psychopath, or Both?​

Among the revelations about Hancock:

• More than 40,000 residents of care homes in England died with Covid. Hancock was advised by Whitty in April 2020 to test everyone entering the care homes. He rejected the advice because testing capacity was limited and, for political (PR) reasons, he prioritized reaching his grandiose, self-imposed target of 100,000 daily tests in the lower risk general community over protecting the care home residents, despite repeated claims of having thrown a “protective ring” around the homes. Patients discharged into care homes from hospitals were tested but not those coming in from the community. That is, “focussed protection” of the GBD was the right way to go. Instead Hancock rubbished the GBD and belittled its three eminent epidemiologist authors.
• Social care minister Helen Whateley told Hancock that stopping visits to care homes by spouses was “inhumane” and risked the elderly residents “just giving up” after prolonged isolation, but he refused to budge.
• He rejected advice in November 2020 to shift from 14-day Covid quarantine for people who had been in close contact with anyone infected, to five days of testing because it would “imply we’ve been getting it wrong.” Talk of a sunk cost fallacy. Over 20 million people in total were told to self-isolate even if they had no symptoms. God I feel vindicated for refusing flatly to join Australia’s clunky test and trace program.
• In a discussion on how to ensure the public complied with ever-changing lockdown restrictions, Hancock suggested “We frighten the pants off everyone” and Project Fear was born. Simon Case, Britain’s most senior civil servant, said the “fear/guilt factor” was “vital” in “ramping up the messaging” during the third lockdown in January 2021.
• Informed of the emergence of the alpha/Kent variant in December 2020, Hancock and his aides canvassed the ideal time to “deploy” the new variant in order to sustain public fear of the virus to ensure continued compliance with directives.
• A member of his team asked if they could “lock up” Nigel Farage after he tweeted a video of himself at a pub in Kent, because the troublesome politician was such a thorn in the government’s side.
• Hancock and Case mocked people forced to isolate in quarantine hotels, joking about returning travelers being “locked up” in “shoe box” rooms. Case wished he could “see some of the faces of people coming out of first class and into a premier inn shoe box.” Informed by Hancock that 149 people had entered “Quarantine Hotels due to their own free will,” Case replied: “Hilarious.”
• Hancock fought furious internal battles to hog the vaccine media limelight. He preened about his pictures in the media and boasted how the pandemic could propel his career “into the next league.”
• He told other ministers to “get heavy with the police” to enforce lockdown restrictions and then boasted that “The plod got their marching orders.” This raises questions about the legality of interfering with the operational instructions of police.
• Intoxicated by his own brilliance and infallibility, Hancock attacked vaccine czar Dame Kate Bingham, the chief of the National Health Service (NHS) Lord Stevens, and CEO of the Wellcome Trust (and now top scientist at the WHO) Sir Jeremy Farrar.
• He schemed with his aides, with the help of a secret spreadsheet, to deny rebellious party MPs funding for pet projects in their constituencies if they did not fall in line, including a new centre for disabled children and adults.

I can relate therefore to this online comment on one of these stories in the Telegraph: “Hancock was intellectually stunted pondlife before the pandemic and still is now, but with more slime and a bit of a stink to him.” Or, to put it in more technical language: Hancock comes across as an ego-driven total f…wit.
The state criminalized quotidian activities like sitting on a bench in the park, walking on the beach and meeting with extended family. Public health messaging was weaponized to normalize and sacralize spirit-sapping levels of social isolation. Even East Germany’s Stasi did not stop the elderly from hugging their grandchildren. Elderly patients were forced to die alone and surviving family members were banned from saying final farewells and denied the solace of a full funeral.

Hancock was able to get away with exercising his lust for power because his prime minister, Boris Johnson, proved to be lazy, weak, and vacillating. The vivid description of Johnson by fired top aide Dominic Cummings – an out of control “shopping trolley” lurching from side to side in a supermarket aisle, depending on who he last talked to – has been amply validated by the leaked files. The instinctual libertarian rapidly morphed from a lockdown sceptic into a zealot.

Lessons​

The Lockdown Files confirm that politics informed the policymakers in most of the key decisions on how to manage the pandemic. Accordingly, while medical specialists can debate the technical details of different medical approaches, policy specialists should be among the lead assessors in evaluating the justifications for and results and effectiveness of the policy interventions.
The existing frameworks, processes and institutional safeguards under which liberal democracies operated until 2020 had ensured expanding freedoms, growing prosperity, an enviable lifestyle, quality of life and educational and health outcomes without precedent in human history. Abandoning them in favour of a tightly centralized small group of decision-makers liberated from any external scrutiny, contestability, and accountability produced both a dysfunctional process and suboptimal outcomes: very modest gains for much long-lasting pain.
The sooner we return to the conviction that good process ensures better long-term outcomes and acts as a check against suboptimal outcomes alongside curbs on abuses of power and wastage of public funds, the better.
Interventions rooted in panic, driven by political machinations, and using all the levers of state power to terrify citizens and muzzle critics in the end needlessly killed massive numbers of the most vulnerable while putting the vast low-risk majority under house arrest. The benefits are questionable but the harms are increasingly obvious. The Johnson government in general and Hancock in particular revalidate Lord Acton’s astute observation that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
They weren’t following the science but Hancock’s ego and career ambitions. He exploited Johnson’s “stonking” laziness and shallowness. The Lockdown Files reveal a government gone rogue that viewed and treated the people as enemies. The UK, US, and Australia don’t need an inquiry strung out over years, focused on small details to the neglect of the big picture, with the tame conclusion that lessons will be learnt but blame cannot be apportioned. Instead we need criminal charges, and the sooner the better.
Britain’s top civil servant acted more like a partisan political hack than an apolitical, neutral and loyal-to-the-elected-government of the day civil servant. Case’s bias, immaturity, poor judgment, and unwillingness to support the PM with accurate, balanced, and impartial information were such as to warrant instant sacking. His hubris is such that he is yet to submit his resignation despite the publication of these appalling exchanges with Hancock who had effectively taken over the government.
The fact that as the “absolutely cringe-worthy” revelations came tumbling out, PM Rishi Sunak insisted Case has his confidence reflects poorly on Sunak’s judgment.

​

Flawed process produced bad outcomes.
In a modern-day version of sacrificing virgins to appease the viral gods, the young have lost many more years of their life to buy a few more lonely, miserable months for the infirm old.
If the vast sums thrown at Covid had been redirected to the leading killer diseases and upgrades to public health infrastructure, using the standard quality-adjusted life years (QALY) metric, many million deaths would have been averted around the world over the coming decades.
If we fail to heed the lessons of the last three years, we will indeed be condemned to repeat them, not just for new pandemics of infectious diseases but also for other crises like the “climate emergency.”

 

[Apollonian]

Canada Advances Plan to Euthanize Children Without Parental Consent​

Frank BergmanMarch 31, 2023 - 12:57 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/canada-advances-plan-euthanize-children-without-parental-consent/

The liberal Canadian government is advancing plans to update the country’s “assisted suicide” laws to allow authorities to euthanize children without the need for parental consent.
Assisted suicide and euthanasia have become rapidly accepted in Canada.
The government has continued to lift restrictions on its Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD) program.
Initially, it was introduced to give people who were terminally ill an option to prevent then from dying a slow painful death.
Over time, however, the laws have become more relaxed.

Canadians can now apply for euthanasia for a variety of reasons, including minor illnesses or being too poor or homeless.
But there are still efforts to expand it even further.
A new government report on MAiD was recently presented to Parliament.
The report urges the inclusion of minors in the eligibility for physician-assisted death — without parental consent.
The Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying presented its latest report last week, which included a recommendation that minors be able to request MAiD.

“For MAID and mature minors, the committee heard a mix of views about whether MAID should be available to those under the age of 18,” the report read.
“Many witnesses believed that age alone does not determine whether someone is capable of consenting to MAID. At the same time, a cautious approach was recommended, especially since there is little evidence from youth themselves on this topic.
“Most witnesses agreed that if MAID for mature minors were allowed, it should only be under track one (reasonably foreseeable natural death).
“The committee recommends that mature minors should have access to MAID under track one.
“The committee also recommends that youth be consulted on the topic of MAID and mature minors.”
The committee then made the recommendation that Canada should begin, within five years, funding research and consulting “with minors on the topic of MAID, including minors with terminal illnesses, minors with disabilities, minors in the child welfare system and Indigenous minors.”
Additionally, the report recommended that minors be able to be euthanized, even if their parent doesn’t approve:

That the Government of Canada establish a requirement that, where appropriate, the parents or guardians of a mature minor be consulted in the course of the assessment process for MAID, but that the will of a minor who is found to have the requisite decision-making capacity ultimately takes priority.

The report had the backing of Liberal, NDP, and Bloc-Quebecois members of the committee, though a dissenting opinion from conservatives was also included.
They argued that “it would be irresponsible for the Liberal government to move ahead with any expansion of MAID for mature minors,” and said they do not support this further expansion.
“The Liberals’ rushed and reckless approach to Canada’s MAID regime has put the lives of vulnerable Canadians at risk,” the dissenting opinion said.
“We caution the Liberal government against repeating the mistakes they made concerning MAID MD-SUMC.
“MAID policy must be grounded in evidence, consultation with impacted groups, and with serious consideration given to protecting the vulnerable.”

READ MORE: Canada’s Government-Run Healthcare Is Euthanizing Sick & Poor People [see https://slaynews.com/opinion/canadas-government-run-healthcare-is-euthanizing-sick-poor-people/]

 

[Apollonian]

Doctors Accused of Euthanizing Down Syndrome Teen Against Family’s Wishes​

Frank BergmanApril 10, 2023 - 12:57 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/doctors-a...en-against-family-wishes/?utm_source=mailpoet

Doctors in Wisconsin have been accused of euthanizing a teenage girl with Down syndrome, against the wishes of her devastated family.
19-year-old Grace Schara died at Appleton’s St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in 2021.
According to the Schara family, Grace had been given a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order without their knowledge or consent.
She was then given a lethal cocktail of drugs that ended her life.
As Grace started to die in the hospital, the family alleges that doctors refused to resuscitate her and stood by while she passed away.

In a Facebook post, the family members say they plan to sue the hospital and accuse the doctors of intentionally killing the teen.
Grace had been given a cocktail of drugs — Precedex, Lorazepam, and Morphine — which are known to cause hypoxia, or low levels of oxygen in body tissues.
“As Grace slipped into acute respiratory failure and Grace’s sister begged for help, instead of starting CPR immediately, the nurses refused; Grace’s physician had independently designated her as a ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ (DNR),” the family’s statement said.
“That DNR order was written without the family’s consent and in defiance of the Schara family’s express wishes that all lifesaving measures be deployed for their Down yndrome daughter.”
The family has filed paperwork with the state of Wisconsin to begin the lawsuit process, according to WND.

“St. Elizabeth’s not only breached the Standard of Care, but their unethical behavior led directly to Grace’s death,” Scott Schara, Grace’s father, said.
“It’s clear to me that this hospital was a dangerous place for Down syndrome patients like my daughter.
“My Grace was discriminated against due to her disability and she received grossly subpar healthcare, in clear violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.”
In a website set up to keep the public informed about the court case, the family spoke lovingly of their life with Grace.
They say she referred to her third copy of the 21st chromosome as her “love chromosome.”
Grace’s Down syndrome didn’t stop her from doing anything, her family said.
Both Grace and her mother caught COVID-19 during the pandemic.
Although she was doing well, the family had been monitoring Grace’s oxygen levels out of excess caution.
When they dropped below 90, they took her to the emergency room, where it was recommended that she be admitted into the hospital.
“We never would have considered that this would be a dangerous place to put her in,” Schara said.
He added that doctors tried to place Grace on a ventilator, citing results from a blood gas draw.
However, the concerned father asked them to run the test again.
When they did the test again, it came back within normal levels.
Then, he said hospital staff began pressuring them to give a preauthorization to ventilate Grace if they felt it necessary but the family refused.
By the fourth day of Grace’s hospitalization, Schara said the head nurse came in with an armed guard and told him he was not allowed to remain in her room anymore.
“Obviously, because I was challenging the protocols I was seeing,” he said.
“So I called an attorney friend, and he said, ‘Scott, just leave peacefully.’
“And I gave Grace a hug… you know, I could just see in her eyes she was sad.
“That’s the last time I saw her.”
Grace’s mother, Cindy, was not allowed to be with her daughter as a replacement advocate because she had COVID-19 as well.
As a result, Grace was left alone in the hospital for 44 hours.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Grace had the right to an advocate.
The family tried to get Grace’s sister, Jessica Vander Heiden, approved as a replacement advocate.
However, the hospital staff failed to respond to the request, according to the family.
“No doctor or nurse came to me and said anything they were doing,” Vander Heiden said.
“I had to overhear what they were saying.
“They were just making decisions on their own, without even communicating with Grace’s power-of-attorney, which was my mother.”
One of the drugs they administered to Grace, Precedex, is not meant to be given for longer than 24 hours.
Nevertheless, doctors had given the maximum dose to Grace for four days.
Then, during her last day in the hospital, they added lorazepam and morphine, which Schara said is known to cause death.
The family alleges that hospital staff gave Grace this lethal cocktail of drugs to intentionally kill her.
“They gave Grace a combination of drugs that none of us could have survived,” he said.
Meanwhile, Vander Heiden noticed that Grace’s hands were growing cold, but nurses shrugged off her concerns.
Eventually, she realized she couldn’t find a pulse, and her eyes were rolling back in her head.
She begged the nurses to come help, but they refused.
When the Scharas begged them to help, they responded that Grace was DNR.
According to the family, Grace had been placed on DNR by hospital staff, against their wishes, and without their knowledge.
Vander Heiden said she watched helplessly as dozens of nurses stood by and did nothing as Grace slowly died.
“We not only hope that justice will come for Grace but, also, for the hundreds of thousands of lives stolen by this medical tyranny,” Vander Heiden said at a press conference.
“These crimes against humanity must stop.
“They need to be held accountable for their actions.”

READ MORE: Canada Advances Plan to Euthanize Children Without Parental Consent [see https://slaynews.com/news/doctors-a...n-against-family-wishes/?utm_source=mailpoet/]

 

[Apollonian]

A Good Death? The Midazolam Murders (A Documentary from Ickonic.com)​

Link: https://rumble.com/v1dq083-a-good-death-documentary-about-involuntary-euthanasia-with-midazolam.html

Each year, tens of thousands of elderly and terminally ill patients are quietly euthanised in NHS facilities. In hospitals, care homes and hospices, behind closed doors, their deaths are hastened in what appears to be a caring and humane way. But how has this practice of euthanasia – illegal in the UK and carrying a life prison sentence – become so widespread and acceptable? And why are people who are nowhere near the end of their lives being given killer ‘cocktails’ of drugs that are used in many US states for executions?

Source: https://www.ickonic.com

 

[Apollonian]

Why Are Hospitals Still Using Remdesivir?​

by Stella Paul | Brownstone Institute
May 30th 2023, 12:51 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/why-are-hospitals-still-using-remdesivir/

Nobody believes in Remdesivir anymore. How can you possibly make a case for it? Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed “Run Death Is Near” after it started killing thousands of Covid patients in the hospital. The experts claimed that Remdesivir would stop Covid; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.

As word got around, some patients started showing up in the emergency room with signs saying, “NO REMDESIVIR” and refusing to take it. (Not that their refusal helped: many were given it anyway, often without their knowledge.)

When I heard that Remdesivir is still being used, I couldn’t believe it. How could hospitals be so brazen as to push this killer drug, even after the lawsuits started flying? Fourteen California families are now suing three hospitals, claiming their loved ones suffered wrongful deaths from what they call “the Remdesivir protocol.” Expect other lawsuits to follow, because the Remdesivir carnage was nationwide.

I began to poke around to see if hospitals are still giving Remdesivir and I think I’ve found the smoking gun. Two smoking guns, in fact. First, it’s still listed on the NIH web site as its standard of care for Covid. Second (and in my opinion, more importantly), the CMS.gov official website says, “The COVID-19 public health emergency (PCE) ended at the end of the day on May 11, 2023.” Two sentences later, it states, “The enhanced payments described on this page will end on September 30, 2023.” And there it is, listed in bold: Remdesivir.

Allow me to translate the bureaucratese. “Even though we acknowledge the Covid emergency is over, the federal government will continue to pay lavish bonuses to hospitals who kill their patients with Remdesivir through the end of the fiscal year.”
https://infowars.iljmp.com/4/kwpwi
Money; it all comes down to money. There’s SO much money in the Covid con game. The CARES Act of 2020 slathered $2 trillion across the country to deal with Covid, and lots of it went to hospitals. The 20 largest hospitals enjoyed a 62 percent increase in their combined net assets during those glorious Covid years, providing many top executives with a $10 million salary or more.

Alas, the federal government insisted that if hospitals wanted to get paid, they had to treat Covid patients with Remdesivir. The fact that this drug was made by their good friends at Gilead Science and everybody was getting rich from the deals they cut had absolutely nothing to do with it, of course. It was all done for love of the people. But just to make sure that Remdesivir could attain its current billion-dollar status, the feds incentivized hospitals with a 20 percent boost to the entire hospital bill of patients treated with Remdesivir.

And here’s the kicker: the feds did not allow hospitals to even consider using safe, cheap drugs like ivermectin.

“Remdesivir caused a lot of renal failures,” Ralph Lorigo told me. Mr. Lorigo is a lawyer in Buffalo who spent last year helping families rescue loved ones who were trapped inside hospitals that were killing them. “If you got Covid, the hospital put you on this government protocol and didn’t even check if you have kidney disease. There was a real lack of monitoring.”

“I was surprised when the FDA approved it, even though The World Health Organization (WHO) had advised against using it. But Big Pharma had the strength to push it through.”

He added, “Hospitals had stopped doing elective cases, which is how they made money. So now they made money giving people Remdesivir and putting them on ventilators, which the government also paid big bonuses for. Every day you’re on a vent, it’s damaging you. When I managed to get people out of the hospital and off the vent and they got ivermectin, they lived. When I couldn’t get into court or lost the case, they died.”

It’s way past time for there to be a hard stop on the use of Remdesivir. And we must work fast to save the children. “In late April 2022, the FDA even approved remdesivir as the first and only COVID-19 treatment for children under 12, including babies as young as 28 days, an approval that boggles the mind, considering COVID-19 is rarely serious in children while remdesivir is ineffective and carries a risk of serious, and deadly, side effect,” writes Dr. Joseph Mercola.

In all my reporting on the Hospital Death Protocol, I’ve never heard a single person say, “You’re wrong. My mother perked right up when they gave her Remdesivir and the ventilation made her bounce out of bed. They saved her life!”

Instead, my inbox and Twitter feed are filled with messages that would make you break down and cry. The Bereaved Army in America needs an investigation into exactly who shattered their lives and why.

 

[Apollonian]

Supreme Court Ends Unvaccinated Canadian Woman’s Fight for Organ Transplant + More​

The Defender’s Big Brother NewsWatch brings you the latest headlines related to governments’ abuse of power, including attacks on democracy, civil liberties and use of mass surveillance. The views expressed in the excerpts from other news sources do not necessarily reflect the views of The Defender.

By The Defender Staff

Link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...inated-canadian-woman-fight-organ-transplant/

Link copied

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.

Supreme Court Ends Unvaccinated Canadian Woman’s Fight for Organ Transplant​

Newsweek reported:
The legal battle waged by a Canadian woman who refused to get the COVID vaccine required for organ transplant recipients came to an end after the Supreme Court of Canada decided against hearing her appeal.
On Thursday, the high court announced it would decline to hear Alberta woman Sheila Annette Lewis’ case challenging the Alberta Health Services, an Alberta hospital and six doctors who removed her from a priority organ transplant waiting list because she was unwilling to get the shot. The doctors, hospital, city of the transplant program and organ that Lewis needs have not been released as the case is subject to a publication ban.
She refused to get the vaccine, saying it violated her conscience, and was moved to the bottom of the list last November. In an affidavit that she “ought to have the choice about what goes into [her] body” and that requiring her to be vaccinated would violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Her efforts were unsuccessful at both the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, which said the Charter did not apply to clinical treatment decisions, and the Alberta Court of Appeal, which upheld the lower court’s decision. Lewis sought to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, which dismissed the case on Thursday.

Louisiana Law Would Require Parental Permission to Use Social Media​

CNBC reported:
Kids and teens under 18 years old in Louisiana may soon need their parents’ permission to sign up for online accounts, including for social media, gaming and more, under a newly passed bill in the state.
The measure, which still needs to be signed by the state’s governor to take effect, follows a trend of laws in conservative states such as Utah and Arkansas that seek to limit adolescents’ unrestricted access to social media. Liberal states such as California as well as some Democratic lawmakers in Congress have also been working on new regulations to protect kids from some of the harmful effects of social media.
The unanimous vote in both chambers of the Louisiana state legislature underscores the popularity of legislation aimed at protecting kids from online harms.

If Children’s Privacy Bills Are Going to Make Surveillance Worse Maybe We Should Just Ban Smartphones Altogether​

Forbes reported:
What kids are experiencing today on social media is unlike anything prior generations have had to contend with. The influence of social media on youth mental health is shaped by many complex factors, including, but not limited to, the number of time children and adolescents spend on platforms, the type of content they consume or are otherwise exposed to, the activities and interactions social media affords, and the degree to which it disrupts activities that are essential for health like sleep and physical activity.
According to the Surgeon General’s advisory note, over 95% of teens have access to smartphones, exposing them to a digital world saturated with potentially harmful content.
We’ve reached a point at which tech companies are no longer capable of denying the negative impact they’re having on our children. This isn’t one study, it’s multiple studies over time. Two weeks ago the United States Surgeon General, Vivek Murth, joined in with an official Advisory Note representing the dangers at hand.
The problem with most of the laws being proposed is that even with the best intentions they’ve mostly increased surveillance and they’re making it a legal requirement to profile children. I’ve been in the room for the drafting of a couple of these bills and I can safely say that nobody in the room wants to make the situation worse but creating a bill that is 1) meaningful enough to make an impact and 2) is simple enough for other legislators to understand and support is no small task.

Why We Should Ban Smartphones in Schools​

The Washington Post reported:
On Tuesday, Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt published “Get Phones Out of Schools Now” for the Atlantic, cross-posted from his “After Babel” Substack. If you haven’t made up your mind about the advisability of young people taking smartphones to school, Haidt’s careful, well-documented argument will likely move you into the “do not allow” camp.
Comparing today with just four years ago, Haidt writes, “The case for phone-free schools is much stronger now.” Evidence has lately become clear that phones are addling young minds and that there is a causal link between their use and skyrocketing mental health issues among the young. (As if that weren’t enough to make you want to grab children’s phones away from them, the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday published a horrifying article, “Instagram Connects Vast Pedophile Network.”)
Haidt succinctly summarizes his findings: “So the time is right for parents and educators to ask: Should we make the school day phone-free? Would that reduce rates of depression, anxiety, and self-harm? Would it improve educational outcomes? I believe that the answer to all of these questions is yes.”
Commonplace but feckless school rules about not using phones during class aren’t sufficient (and are ignored anyway). He’s talking about barring students from physically possessing a phone at school anywhere, anytime. Phones should be essentially locked up in the morning and returned at the end of the school day, Haidt says.

Banks’ Growing Reliance on Chatbots to Handle Customer Service Tasks Worries Consumer Watchdog​

The Epoch Times reported:
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has warned about banks’ growing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to handle routine customer service requests.
The CFPB is worried that banks or loan-servicing companies may cut back on human customer service employees and push increasing routine tasks to AI.
“To reduce costs, many financial institutions are integrating artificial intelligence technologies to steer people toward chatbots,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra.
“Chatbots can also raise certain privacy and security risks. When chatbots are poorly designed, or when customers are unable to get support, there can be widespread harm and customer trust can be significantly undermined.”

Maine Considers Ending COVID Vaccine Mandate for Health Workers​

WGME 13 reported:
The administration of Gov. Janet Mills is conducting a review that could lead to the state following the federal government and other Democratic-led states in ending a controversial COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.
Roughly half of the states instituted vaccine mandates at some point during the pandemic, but Gov. Janet Mills put Maine’s 2021 requirement among the most rigid ones by allowing no testing alternative for workers who did not want to be vaccinated. Conservatives here rallied in opposition to it, turning the mandate into a wedge issue with the Democratic governor.
Maine still has not announced its plans, but the Mills administration is conducting “a review of the evidence base” for the rule and will consider proposing changes afterward, though there is no timeline for any changes, said Jackie Farwell, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services.

New York State Dept. of Health Clarifies COVID Vaccine Mandate Repeal Process​

RochesterFirst.com reported:
The New York State Department of Health released new information about the process of repealing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.
The department announced it had begun the process of repealing the mandate on May 24. On Thursday, it said the next step would be a 60-day public comment period. That would be followed by consideration and approval from the Public Health and Planning Council.
The department said it would not cite healthcare facilities for new violations of the mandate during the repeal process.

Dutch Ask TikTok for Access to Data as EU Scrutinizes Big Tech​

Bloomberg reported:
The Dutch government asked ByteDance Ltd.’s TikTok to allow researchers access to the functioning of the social media platform in a bid to protect users online.
Dutch Minister for Digitalization Alexandra van Huffelen made the request at a meeting with TikTok Chief Executive Officer Shou Zi Chew in Singapore, she said in a tweet on Thursday.
Dutch researchers will use the access to analyze how TikTok’s algorithm functions, the minister’s spokesman, Thomas van Oortmerssen, said by phone.

 

[Apollonian]

Autistic and intellectually handicapped individuals are now being EUTHANIZED in the Netherlands​

STATION GOSSIP 10:53

Link: http://www.stationgossip.com/2023/07/autistic-and-intellectually-handicapped.html/

An alarming new study shows that people with autism and other types of intellectual disabilities are being euthanized in the Netherlands, ...​

“White hat” hacker dismantles world’s largest pedophile ring, sends child rapists to prison
Top brass military officers give Macron ULTIMATUM to end riots in France

An alarming new study shows that people with autism and other types of intellectual disabilities are being euthanized in the Netherlands, and experts are concerned that these individuals are not capable of understanding the repercussions of their decision.

According to researchers from Kingston University, dozens of otherwise healthy people with intellectual handicaps or autism died via physician-assisted suicide from 2012 and 2021. Moreover, five individuals under the age of 30 who died this way cited autism as the only reason or a major factor in their decision to end their life.

During the period studied, around 60,000 people elected to end their lives with euthanasia in the Netherlands. The country’s euthanasia review committee made documents available for 900 of those cases as part of transparency measures. Many of those involved were older and were dealing with serious conditions such as cancer, ALS or Parkinson’s disease. However, of these cases, 39 had autism or intellectual disabilities, and 18 of them were younger than 50.

Some of them cited problems such as unbearable loneliness as being behind their desire to end their lives. For eight individuals, the sole cause of their desire to die was related to an intellectual disability, such as a lack of coping strategies, an inability to adjust to change, or social isolation.

One young man in his 20s, for example, reported feeling unhappiness since childhood and suffering from regular bullying and an inability to connect with other people. He chose to end his life because he felt that continuing to live that was “an abomination.”

This upsetting trend has led experts to question whether the country’s law permitting doctors to help suicidal patients die by providing them with lethal injections still aligns with its intentions when it was first enacted into law in 2002.

Ethicists, psychiatrists voice concerns about euthanizing patients with mental issues​

According to ethicist Kasper Raus of Ghent University in Belgium, where this practice is also legal, the type of patient requesting a physician-assisted suicide has evolved dramatically in the last 20 years.

He points out that the Netherlands first legalized human euthanasia with the idea of helping people who are suffering from cancer. The requirements to qualify for the practice include suffering from an incurable disease that causes an “unbearable” amount of physical or mental anguish, although the decision is ultimately left up to doctors. This means that many patients may be able to curtail the requirements if they find a doctor who is willing to help them die.

One Dutch psychiatrist, Dr. Bram Sizzo, weighed in on the disturbing trend, lamenting the fact that some of these people seemed excited by the idea of dying and thought it would end their problems as well as those of their family.

Cambridge University Autism Research Centre Director Simon Baron-Cohen expressed concerns that people who have intellectual disabilities may not fully understand the decision to end their own life, saying it was “abhorrent” that these individuals were not provided with greater support instead of being euthanized.

Kingston University palliative care specialist Irene Tuffrey-Wijne said: “There’s no doubt in my mind these people were suffering. But is society really OK with sending this message, that there’s no other way to help them and it’s just better to be dead?”

It is hard to imagine that anyone who feels like death is the solution to problems like loneliness or social isolation could possibly be considered of sound enough mind to make such a major, irreversible decision. Some experts are rightfully concerned that allowing mentally ill people to choose to die despite not fully understanding the complexity of the situation is veering dangerously into eugenics territory.

 

[Apollonian]

NHS Under Fire: Whistleblower Claims Patients Were Unjustly Euthanized to Falsely Inflate COVID Pandemic Toll​

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON DECEMBER 10, 2023

Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/12/10/...nts-were-euthanized-to-inflate-pandemic-toll/

An NHS whistleblower, who wishes to remain anonymous, has come forward with allegations that the NHS hospitals were not overwhelmed during the Covid-19 pandemic, as was reported by authorities and the mainstream media.
The whistleblower also confirmed that the little care given throughout the pandemic amounted to negligence, and that the government and NHS bosses essentially instructed staff to let people die, or in some cases kill them through the ‘End of Life Care’ programme and falsely label the deaths as being due to Covid-19.

---

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
TYPE YOUR EMAIL…
SUBSCRIBE

---

This individual referred to as Dr. John, has worked in minor injuries and illness centres as well as in a primary care role throughout the pandemic.
Dr. John claims that he has “seen this mess evolve from the very beginning of the pandemic” and that hospitals were actually extremely quiet and almost empty during the first lockdown.

“I used to see an average of 20 patients per day, that dropped to 1 – 2 patients during the first lockdown. I have even witnessed an elderly lady with horrific broken bones come into the hospital three weeks after her accident as she was too scared of catching coronavirus to visit the hospital sooner. In the end, the pain overcame the fear.
“I have also assessed people with chest pains in their homes who would not go for further assessment as they were so scared of ‘the virus’ they would rather chance a heart attack than the infection or the loneliness of going to the hospital alone.”

NHS statistics certainly back up Dr John’s claims.
We examined the data for A&E attendance in the months of April (Lockdown 1) and November (Lockdown 2) for 2020 and compared this with April and November in 2018 and 2019 which showed A&E attendance during the first lockdown was 57% down on the previous year, and A&E attendance during lockdown 2 was 31% down on the previous year.

• 2018 – April – 1,984,369 attended A&E / November – 2,036,847 attended A&E
• 2019 – April – 2,112,165 attended A&E / November – 2,143,505 attended A&E
• 2020 – April – 916,581 attended A&E / November – 1,485,132 attended A&E

This significant drop in attendance suggests that people were too scared to visit the hospital due to the fear propaganda perpetuated in the mainstream media.
Furthermore, Dr. John also describes how changes in care policies have led to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, resulting in negative outcomes for patients and their families.
He states that usual follow-up visits were not done and parents were removing casts from their children’s broken limbs, “I dread to think the state of some of their limbs,”.
He also mentioned that a change in care policies led to one 80+–year-old woman being permanently disabled.
He describes visiting an elderly patient who had only had a single face-to-face physio follow-up and a single follow-up via phone call following a hip operation. He found her in a bedridden state, unable to transfer to a commode, her dignity taken away.

“I recall visiting one patient a female in her 80’s. She’d only had a single face-to-face physio follow-up and a single follow-up via phone call following a hip operation. I found her laid in her mess on incontinence pads, her dignity taken because she was bed bound with a fixed rotated leg, unable to transfer to a commode. Her family were extremely upset”.

The demise of the NHS didn’t just affect Dr John’s patients though, it also affected him personally as he lost a family member to cancer during the alleged pandemic due to not being given the required care.

“He was given 7 years to live with his illness, he lasted just 1 year in the new NHS system.
“I’ve also witnessed the desperation of families witnessing their own relatives dying sooner than they should have due to the lack of professional care that should have been provided. It has been a very sad year in which I have witnessed the demise of the health service.
“I have also seen stroke patients sent home without being given any follow-up care. I also know of a triage policy in which staff were forced to send potentially seriously ill people home on the premise of giving them a call if their condition worsened”.

Dr. John’s claims are supported by a Care Quality Commission report that found 34% of NHS staff were pressured into placing “Do Not Resuscitate” orders on Covid patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. The policy led to people with disabilities and learning difficulties accounting for 3 in every 5 Covid deaths according to official ONS figures.
This testimony from an NHS staff member suggests that the public was being lied to regarding the official narrative of the NHS being overwhelmed during the pandemic.
It highlights the negative impact of misinformation and fear propaganda on the public’s perception of the situation, leading to people avoiding seeking medical treatment for fear of contracting the virus.
Additionally, it also highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care and negative outcomes for patients and their families.
A fact that is also backed up by a document nicknamed ‘The Death Document’ that was published by NICE, an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department of Health and Social Care.
As well as a mountain of evidence that the UK Government authorised the essential “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by Midazolam injection and then told the public Covid-19 was to blame.
Between 2 March and 12 June 2020, 18,562 residents of care homes in England died with COVID-19, including 18,168 people aged 65 and over, representing almost 40% of all deaths involving COVID-19 in England during this period.
This is a significant number considering that during the same period, 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England, representing a 46% increase compared with the same period in previous years.
A number of decisions and policies adopted by authorities at the national and local level in the UK violated care home residents’ rights to life, to health, and to non-discrimination.
These include:

• Mass discharges from hospital into care homes.
• Imposition of blanket Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders on residents of many care homes around the country and restrictions on residents’ access to hospital.
• Suspension of regular oversight procedures for care homes by the statutory regulating body, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), and the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

These actions by authorities contributed to the high number of deaths among care home residents during the pandemic.
It is also stated that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency.
Therefore, typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. It is also noted that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
With that in mind here is an important warning applied to Midazolam courtesy of the US National Library of Medicine –

Midazolam injection may cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death. You should only receive this medication in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops. Your doctor or nurse will watch you closely after you receive this medication to make sure that you are breathing properly.

The warning states that this medication should only be given in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the necessary equipment to monitor the patient’s heart and lungs and provide life-saving treatment if needed.
The question is therefore raised as to why the “Death Document” published in April 2020 instructs doctors to treat Covid-19 patients suffering a disease hat allegedly affects the respiratory system with Midazolam, a drug that affects the respiratory system.
Anoher question is raised as to why during the same month out-of-hospital prescribing for Midazolam was twice the amount seen in 2019.

This raises concerns about the appropriateness of the treatment being given to Covid-19 patients in care homes during the pandemic.
The CQC, a statutory body commissioned by the Department for Health and Social Care, conducted a special review of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigation found evidence of unacceptable and inappropriate DNACPR’s being made throughout the pandemic and states that it is possible that cases of inappropriate DNACPR’s remain in place.
The CQC’s investigation also found that throughout the “pandemic” this guidance was not being followed as they had received deeply troubling evidence from numerous sources that during the COVID19 pandemic DNACPR notices have been applied in a blanket fashion to some categories of person by some care providers, without any involvement of the individuals or their families.
Almost 10% of people using services or families who responded to their call for evidence told the British Institute of Human Rights that they had experienced pressure or use of DNACPR orders.
Thirty-four per cent of people working in health and/or social care said they were under pressure to put DNACPR’s in place without involving the person.
In addition, 71% of advocacy organizations and campaigners said they experienced DNACPR orders put in place or pressure to make them without being involved in the decision.
It’s also noted that these DNACPR orders were wrongly used as an excuse to begin end-of-life care.

The Death Document​

NICE claims to be an independent organisation but in truth it seems to be anything but once you look into its structure. On this page HERE you will see the quote “Our Structure – The structure of the organisation and how we work with the government”. Following the link to the “Our Structure” page HERE, and then clicking “Find out more about how we develop guidelines” takes you to a page HERE from which is it clearly stated that “Topics are referred to NICE from the following organisations”:

• Healthcare topics: NHS England
• Public health topics: Department of Health and Social Care
• Social care topics: Department of Health and Social Care and Department for Education.

A copy of the NICE framework is HERE which you can go through at your leisure. As you will see at Clause 4.1 “The Secretary of State is accountable to Parliament for the health system (its “steward”), including NICE”.
All the above information points to NICE not being independent at all. It is clearly part of the UK government, (NICE is funded by and accountable to the Department of Health and Social Care) and operates as an agency of the NHS. Further, and worryingly, given that it does not appear to be an independent organisation, the reach of NICE is extremely wide ranging given their guidance is implemented not only in hospitals, but in GP practices, and care homes and community organisations, along with others, and extends internationally.
It is with all the above in mind, that we must ask the question “Are the UK government, via the Department of Health and Social Care, responsible in any way for NICE guideline NG163 which led to the unnecessary killing of the UK’s elderly and most vulnerable by recommending the use of Midazolam and Opioids for the “treatment” of Covid 19?”
This document is tricky to find. If you search for it on the NICE website, you will reach a page that states that this guidance has been updated by NG191, which supersedes it. There is no library copy of NG163 for you to look at.
Clare Wills Harrison, a lawyer who has been exposing the Midazolam scandal since 2020, found NG163 some time ago along with multiple other documents which have since come to light and are relevant to the Midazolam issue. It is fair to say that NG163 has directly led to the incorrect use of a protocol which Clare and her team call “the death pathway”, and they have come to the conclusion that where the word “pathway” appears in any medical recommendations, this is normally a cause for concern.
You can read NG163 yourself by clicking HERE
When you read NG163, note the date – 3rd April 2020. This was less than 2 weeks after the UK entered lock down. Even if we concede that NICE, via the government, were working on treatment guidelines from January 2020, when early reports of Covid 19 were circulating around the world, that would have given NICE only 3 months to formulate the guidance in NG163. It is inconceivable that NICE could have the evidence and effectiveness information about the use of Midazolam and Opioids for the treatment of breathlessness and anxiety in Covid 19, within this time frame.
NG163 clearly states, Midazolam did not have a UK marketing licence to be used for breathlessness or agitation at the date of its publication. If prescribed for the same, it would therefore be regarded as being used off label. A PowerPoint presentation created by Clare Wills Harrison (see here) explains the extra requirements placed on anyone prescribing a medicine off label. You should also consider the consistent refusal by the UK health agencies to allow prescribing off label for other cheap anti-viral drugs to treat Covid.
Source
The GMC regulates doctors in the United Kingdom. They set standards, hold a register, quality assure education and investigate complaints.
On 14th April the GMC put out a “Joint statement: Community-based prescribing for COVID-19 symptoms” which you can find HERE.
The joint statement irrefutably supports the NICE guidance in NG163 –
Source

Source
It’s quite clear, from the evidence provided by whistleblowing NHS staff, investigative lawyers, and official Government reports is that you gave up over two years of your life due to a lie.
A lie that involved prematurely ending the lives of thousands upon thousands of people, who you were told died of Covid-19.
A lie that has involved committing one of the greatest crimes against humanity in living memory.
A lie that has required three things – fear, your compliance, and a drug known as Midazolam.