Ukraine and Its Surrogacy Industry

sniffy

Senior Reporter
Ukraine and Its Surrogacy Industry


The Ukraine has one of the world’s largest gestational surrogacy industries. Each year, between 2000 and 2500 babies are born by surrogacy in the Ukraine to low income women.

The surrogacy industry plasters advertisements on buses and the metro, for healthy women of child bearing age. To encourage women to participate, the industry pays the surrogate mother $11,000 and a $250 monthly stipend.

This is an enormous amount of money particularly for the Ukraine, where the average yearly salary is $3,000.

There are at least 33 private surrogacy clinics, which thrive under Ukraine’s lenient regulation and are aided by skilled physicians readily available to carry out the procedure.

Demand for surrogate mothers skyrocketed after Asian countries, such as Nepal, India and Thailand, outlawed commercial surrogacy because of its exploitation of women. Unfortunately, exploitation is occurring in the Ukraine, with surrogate mothers living in terrible conditions, especially during the late stages of pregnancy. The surrogacy business is a highly profitable one that operates in a gray zone of the law, which leads to this abuse of women.

Surrogate mothers and their babies are commodified under this procedure and regarded only as purchased products, never treated as human beings. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly 50 newborns were placed in a Kyiv hotel because parents were unable to enter the country to collect their children.
 

Original text of article. What do you think they are doing?

Ukraine’s surrogacy industry.​


Paul Mieczyslaw
Paul MieczyslawApril 15, 2022

13ukraine-surrogacy5-mobileMasterAt3x-v2-e1650055165387-800x400.jpg



Share Share

Ukraine was a world leader in the surrogacy industry. It is one of the only countries in the world that allows foreigners to enter in surrogacy arrangements. Countries such as India, Nepal, and Thailand have banned the commercial surrogacy industry from selling to foreigners, LGBT couples, and single men. In Ukraine, before the war, it was a thriving industry.

Ukraine’s competitive advantage in this industry include liberal laws and lack of enforced regulations. The birth mother has no right to the child as it is legally owned by the prospective parents who pre-ordered it. Ukraine is a popular destination for homosexuals to purchase children, although this is illegal by Ukrainian law. So how is it done? The surrogates mothers are simply flown to Cyprus to give birth, allowing babies to be sold to anyone.

NYT article from 2020

Jews run the Ukrainian surrogacy industry.

While researching this story I couldn’t help noticing the disproportional amount of times Jews were mentioned as the ones running these businesses. For example in this ABC story warning about the reality of Ukrainian surrogacy, the agency was Lotus Surrogacy, registered in Israel.

In that article a Lotus employee, tasked with finding and supporting surrogate mothers, left after four months because of the way the mothers were treated. “A surrogate mother who was 24 weeks’ pregnant started saying she wasn’t feeling very well… Doctors said treatment would be expensive… the Israeli bosses said they wouldn’t treat her. She had to have an emergency birth because of infection. If we had provided assistance when she said she wasn’t well we could have saved the babies… I can’t recommend Lotus because of their treatment of the surrogates.”

The largest surrogate agency in Ukraine is BioTexCom, owned by German citizen Albert Tochilovsky. BioTexCom handles one quarter of the surrogacy market in the world and 70% of the market in Ukraine. In 3 months they deliver about 200 babies. They have managers who are fluent in English, German, Italian, Spanish, French, Romanian, Hebrew, and Chinese. BioTexCom is plagued with scandals such as abandoning babies who are born with disabilities. In 2011 an Italian couple that brought their baby home found that it had no genetic link to either of them after mandatory test by the Italian government.

BioTexCom has very candid interviews with Albert on its own website. In one he talks about how the government was alternately trying to close him down or shake him down for taxes but he managed to get public institutions to support him, adding “Thank God, a new Government took office and things got better, the pressure decreased”. Albert is something of a visionary, and wanted to expand horizontally into biotechnologies like lab grown organs and artificial wombs.

albert_main_photo.jpg

Albert Tochilovsky, owner of Ukraine’s largest surrogacy company


Actual promotion by BioTexCom.
The Polish Connection
Ukraine’s surrogacy industry made news in Poland recently, because a Polish parliamentary politician made a tweet advocating that the surrogacy contracts of Ukrainian women who fled to Poland must be honored. Guess what political ideology she comes from.

FQUoc8LX0Ac3Whx

Ukrainian refugees must be allowed to legally honor their surrogate agreements!
Wanda Nowicka is a member of Lewica, leftists mainly concerned about LGBT and abortion.
Trafficking children is illegal in Poland, and judging by the outrage Wanda’s statement made there little chance this will change. Poles and Ukrainians are often very similar and sometimes very different, at least when it comes to this industry the two countries are very different.

What will happen to the babies being born, unable to be picked up by their foreign parents is unclear.
 
Last edited:
Albert Tochilovsky
MISSING BABIES, TOO MANY BABIES BORN WITH BRAIN DAMAGE.
=======================================

VIDEO: An interview with Biotexcom owner Albert Tochilovsky​

Posted Mon 19 Aug 2019 at 12:12pm

An interview with Biotexcom owner Albert Tochilovsky
Tochilovsky was arrested over a multitude of charges in May last year.
More on:
 
2018
The owner of BioTexCom, Albert Tochilovsky, In July, Tochilovsky and the head physician of the clinic were charged with human trafficking, document forgery and tax evasion in Ukraine. If convicted, they could face up to 15 years in prison. But Tochilovsky, who is under house arrest, believes that the clinic should only be liable for violating the regulations surrounding IVF, as set out by the Ukrainian Ministry of Health, "but for which only administrative penalties would apply," he said.
SNIP
Interpreting the statistics
Valery Sukin, vice president of the Ukrainian Association for Reproductive Medicine (UARM), claims the prosecutor general's charges are unfounded and only serve to damage the reputation of reproductive medicine in the country.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top