Tests of covid mRNA vaxxes show significant dangers and adverse effects/events, suckers

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Details on COVID vaccine risks​

Three studies provide important insights; still reasonable to believe risks outweigh benefits for most people​


Joel S Hirschhorn
Sep 16

Link: https://joelshirschhorn.substack.com/p/details-on-covid-vaccine-risks

Study One

Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials

Here is the abstract:
Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.

Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively). [emphasis added]

Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
Study Two

Randomised Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccines: Do Adenovirus-Vector Vaccines Have Beneficial Non-Specific Effects?

Abstract
To examine the possible non-specific effects (NSEs) of the novel COVID-19 vaccines, we reviewed the randomised control trials (RCTs) of mRNA and adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines reporting overall mortality, including COVID-19 deaths, accident deaths, cardiovascular deaths and other non-COVID-19 deaths. For overall mortality, with 74,193 participants and 61 deaths (mRNA:31; placebo:30), the relative risk (RR) for the two mRNA vaccines compared with placebo was 1.03 (95% CI=0.63-1.71). In the adenovirus-vector vaccines there were 122,164 participants and 46 deaths (vaccine:16; controls:30). The RR for adenovirus-vector vaccines versus placebo/control vaccine was 0.37 (0.19-0.70). The adenovirus-vector vaccines were associated with protection against COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.11 (0.02-0.87)) and non-accident, non-COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.38 (0.17-0.88)). The two types of vaccines differed significantly with respect to impact on overall mortality (p=0.030) as well as non-accident, non-COVID-19 deaths (p=0.046). The placebo controlled RCTs of COVID-19 vaccines were halted rapidly due to clear effects on COVID-19 infections. However, the data presented here argue for performing RCTs of mRNA and adeno-vectored vaccines head-to-head comparing long-term effects on overall mortality.
Key finding:
“Based on the RCTs with the longest possible follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against fatal COVID-19.”
“Ironically, the rich countries in Europe and USA have emphasized the more expensive mRNA vaccines because these vaccines have slightly better short-term vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 than the relatively inexpensive adenovirus-vector vaccines, and due to the detection of a rare blood clotting disorder associated with the adenovirus-vector vaccines. While this decision is understandable in the short-term during a situation with high COVID-19-related mortality, in the endemic situation in which COVID-19-related deaths have decreased this decision may need to be reassessed.”
In other words, the long term risks of the mRNA vaccines can be very significant.
Study Three

Are the Covid mRNA Vaccines Safe?

Here is the bottome line conclusion regarding the mRNA vaccines:
“It is the responsibility of the manufacturers and FDA to ensure that benefits outweigh harms. They have failed to do so.”
Regarding “adverse events of special interest” (AESI) here are some points.
“There were 139 AESIs among the 33,986 people vaccinated, one for every 244 people. That may sound bad, but those numbers mean nothing without comparison against a control group. There were 97 AESIs among the 33,951 people who received a placebo. Combining these numbers implies 12.5 vaccine-induced AESIs for every 10,000 people vaccinated, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.1 to 22.9 per 10,000 people. To phrase it differently, there is one additional AESI for every 800 people vaccinated (95% CI: 437-4762).
That is very high for a vaccine. No other vaccine on the market comes close. “
“Most excess AESIs were coagulation [blood] disorders. For the Pfizer vaccine, there was also an excess of cardiovascular AESIs. “

These are the main conclusions: [edited]
“Covid-recovered people have natural immunity that is stronger than vaccine-induced immunity. So, the benefit of vaccination is – at best – minimal. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as in the randomized trials, there is a negative risk-benefit difference. Why are we mandating people in this group to be vaccinated? It is both unethical and damaging to public health.
  1. While everyone can get infected, children have a minuscule risk of covid mortality. There is very limited safety data from the trials on children. If the risk of adverse reactions is the same as for adults, the harms outweigh the risks. Children should not receive these vaccines.
  2. Older people above 70 have a much higher risk of covid mortality than the population in the Fraiman study. If their risk of adverse reaction is the same, then the benefits outweigh the harms. Hence, older people who have never had covid and are not yet vaccinated may benefit from these vaccines.
  3. It is unclear from the clinical trial data whether the benefits outweigh the risks for working-age adults who have not been vaccinated and who have not already had covid. This is true both historically, for the original covid variants, and currently for the newer ones.
  4. Both risks and benefits may differ for booster shots, but no randomized trial has properly evaluated the trade-off.”
 

Israeli Researchers Raise Alarm on Pfizer Shots, Warn of ‘Severe Side Effects’​

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/israeli-r...warn-severe-side-effects/?utm_source=mailpoet

[vid at site link, above]
8cba3174a095e11a787c2b1268dc9916
Frank BergmanSeptember 25, 20224 Comments
israeli-researchers-pfizer-vaccine-consequences.jpg


Israeli researchers have raised the alarm about Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, warning that the shots can cause “severe and long-lasting side effects.”
In December 2021, Israel’s Ministry of Health commissioned researchers to investigate Pfizer’s Covid shots for adverse events.
The probe was launched a year after the roll-out of the mRNA vaccines started due to mounting concerns about the drug’s side effects.
However, the research was shut down after a leaked video showed the lead researcher discussing the findings.
The video shows Prof. Mati Berkowitz, a pediatric specialist, head of the Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology unit at Shamir Medical Center, and head of the research team appointed by the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH), revealing that the researchers uncovered evidence of severe side effects.

Berkowitz warns of the “medical-legal” consequences of making the research findings public.
Despite a near-total media blackout of the scandal, it is a real story that has been commented upon by highly credentialed medical researchers.
Dr. Harvey Risch, Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale, and Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a researcher at the University of Haifa Health and Risk Communication Research Center, are among the high-profile experts who are raising the alarm about the research.
Dr. Shir-Raz, the Israeli medical researcher who broke the news story, joined GB News’s Neil Oliver to discuss the alarming report.
“Israel having found evidence of severe and long-lasting adverse side effects caused by the Pfizer vaccine, a leaked video recording of a meeting between the researchers and the Israeli Ministry of Health made plain,” Oliver said.

“The researchers’ concerns about their own findings, but contrary to the researcher’s opinions, the official report from the Ministry of Health declared side effects were short-lived and mild, most significantly, despite the researcher’s desire to keep going with their work to learn more, their investigation was canceled by the government.”

WATCH:

Dr. Shir-Raz told Oliver that the Israeli government would not challenge her report and has responded to her queries with silence. She then told her what she had uncovered with her investigation.
“What they found was that every, actually, every aspect of this study’s finding contradicted what we have been told about the side effects of this vaccine,” she said.
“We were told that these are mostly local side effects and that they are mild.
“And that even in, even in some cases there are some serious side effects and those are short-term and past within a few days.
“So first of all, what there is, what the research team found, was new signals, new side effects that were not listed by Pfizer and were not local, not mild, actually they included neurological side effects or muscle side effects and digestive symptoms that were new.”
“They were not listed by Pfizer, not listed in Pfizers in doctor’s leaflet,” Dr. Shir-Raz added.
“Second of all, they found that the side effects were not short-term, but actually many times were long-term.
“Those were long-term events that lasted weeks, months, and sometimes a year or even more.
“And in some cases were ongoing so that the side effects still lasted when the study was over.”
“They all also found a phenomenon they called ‘re-challenge’… and many cases of re-challenge, which is a recurrence or even worsening of a side effect following repeated doses of the vaccine,” Dr. Shir-Raz went on.
“It means that when you get another dose, the side effects either comes back or, or even worsens,” she said.
“So it’s either the side effects were long-term or when they already stopped, they came back after repeated doses.
“So, in fact, the researchers were so worried about those side effects, those findings, that their conclusions were that these findings, first of all, they said they established causality, causal relations between the vaccine and the side effects, especially this phenomenon of re-challenge.
“Professor Berkowitz, the head researcher, explicitly stresses that this phenomenon, the re-challenge, increases the chances, the chances of causality from possible to definitive,” Dr. Shir-Raz notes.
“And even more than that, they explicitly warn, the researchers explicitly warn the Ministry of Health, that they need to think medical-legal.
“They need to think carefully how to present this finding to the public because they contradict what they said, because the minister of health, and not only in Israel, continuously claim that the serious side effects are rare, short-term, and transient, and told people, told people to go get vaccinated.”
WATCH:
Video Player


After Dr. Shir-Raz broke the leaked video of the medical research team’s findings, the Israeli Ministry of Health rapidly shut down the research.
“The Israeli MOH had no adverse events reporting system for the entire year of 2021,” Dr. Shir-Raz points out in her report on the finding.
“They commissioned a research team to analyze the reports from a new system implemented on December 2021.
“A leaked video reveals that in June, the researchers presented serious findings to the MOH, that indicated long-term effects, including some not listed by Pfizer, and a causal relationship – so the Ministry published a manipulative report, and told the public that no new signal was found.”
In the leaked video, Prof. Mati Berkowitz states:
Here we will have to really think medical-legal.
Why medical-legal? Because for quite a few adverse events we said: ‘OK, it exists, and there is a report, but still get vaccinated’.
I mean, we have to think about how to write it and how to present it correctly.
So this will not yield lawsuits later: ‘Wait, wait, wait, you said everything will pass and you can get vaccinated. And now look what happened to me. The phenomenon continues.’
WATCH:
Video Player


“This crucial study was based on a new adverse event reporting system the MOH launched in December 2021 – 12 months AFTER rolling out the vaccines to the public, as the system implemented in December 2020, as they now officially admit, was dysfunctional and did not allow an analysis of the data,” Dr. Shir-Raz states.
“In an internal Zoom meeting in early June, the recording of which was leaked to the press, Prof. Berkowitz warned MOH senior officials that they should think carefully how to present his study’s findings to the public, otherwise they may be sued, since they completely contradict the MOH’s claims that serious side effects are rare, short term and transient,” she continued.
“After analyzing the reports received over a period of 6 months, the research team found that many serious side effects were in fact long-term, including ones not listed by Pfizer, and established causal relations with the vaccine.”
“Yet, instead of publishing the findings in a transparent manner to the public, the MOH withheld the findings for nearly two months, and when it finally released an official document, it misrepresented and manipulated the findings, minimizing the extent of reports, and stating that no new adverse events (‘signals’) were found and that the events that were detected were not necessarily caused by the vaccine, even though the researchers themselves said the exact opposite.”

READ MORE – 44% Pregnant Women Suffered ‘Spontaneous Abortions’ during Pfizer Vaccine Trials, FDA Covered It Up
 

Techno-Hell: Pfizer mRNA Flu Shots Soon to Hit Pharmacies Worldwide​

By Ben Bartee
Global Research, July 28, 2023

Link: https://www.globalresearch.ca/techno-hell-pfizer-mrna-shots-soon-hit-pharmacies-worldwide/5827160/

[vid at site link, above]

pfizer-covid-vaccine-1-400x209.jpg

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
The benevolent multinational technocratic overlords at Pfizer, assisted of course by the magnanimous Public Health™ authorities in the United States and throughout the West, are excited to introduce mRNA flu shots, seeing as how the mRNA COVID-19 injections have performed so admirably over the past two and a half years.
Via Pfizer:
“In September 2022, Pfizer began recruiting volunteers to participate in its Phase 3 clinical trial for that mRNA flu vaccine candidate. The hope, says McLaughlin, is that scientists can develop a flu vaccine faster, and with more accurate strain matching with in-season circulating strains than those currently available. One that may also spark a more robust immune response.
“As these viruses continue to adapt, what really matters is how well your vaccine matches what strains are currently circulating,” says McLaughlin. “And the speed with which you can keep up with that determines the success of a vaccination program.””

Eerily reminiscent of “Operation Warp Speed,” no?
The National Institutes of Health bureaucrats are also eager beavers to get their biotech into the arms of every American man, woman, child, and baby. Because they care.
Via NIH:
“A clinical trial of an experimental universal influenza vaccine developed by researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) Vaccine Research Center (VRC), part of the National Institutes of Health, has begun enrolling volunteers at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. This Phase 1 trial will test the experimental vaccine, known as H1ssF-3928 mRNA-LNP, for safety and its ability to induce an immune response.”
Here is Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla predicting this new technology will be available for deployment by flu season 2023.

To the non-immunocompromised, of course — an inconvenient truth, so to speak, for all of the biomedical profiteers — the flu presents no real risk. A strong immune system, as conferred by proper eating habits, exercising, and vitamin D exposure, is well enough to combat the flu.
But, then again, non-patentable vitamin D from the sun is not going to generate executive bonuses or hearty kickbacks to NIH bureaucrats, now is it?
Perhaps this is why Bill Gates and Co. want to blot out the sun.
 
Back
Top