NSM St. Louis Rally, under the Arch--April 18
- Thread starter Rasp
- Start date
Expose Them All
Registered
Good information, I’m just a couple counties south of nigger-fuxxed St. Louis, I may attend. Seems like the NSM’s Missouri unit is the most active of all the units.
Rasp
Senior Editor
Live Concert after NSM Rally in St. Louis: BE THERE!
The National Socialist Movement is pleased to announce that there will be a live show/concert after the Rally in St. Louis on April 18th. The show will feature an energetic new NSM band called Enforcer. Enforcer plays RAC/OI music and will be playing some songs you all know, along with some of their own songs. In Honor of the 35th Anniversary of the NSM, and our Historic Rally under the Arch in St. Louis on April 18th, we invite all White Patriots to attend this event, and enjoy the music of Enforcer afterwards. There are still open seats in a number of carpools, so get your plans in order asap. This will be one event you will not want to miss. (Please Paste this event announcement on Bulletin Boards, Forums, e-lists, and forward to all your Pro-White Comrades)
NSM :Swastika2:
Tuffy
Registered
Socialist Movement? People here? Is this Al Gore's website? Are you kidding? 
Why would anybody here support a political ideology that supports: bigger government, welfare, higher taxes, niggers, pregnant beaners, reduction/elimination of the 1st and 2nd Amendments, open borders, diversity, affirmative action, gay marriage, and everything else that is destructive.
That's what socialists support today and every other example of socialism in Europe has failed -- including Hitler's brand. Hell, the concept and book was written by a Jew (Marx). Scum like Obama, Clinton, Rev. Al/Jesse, and even the closet socialist "W" support this. Do you want to be aligned with these people? What made America great wasn't socialism but our unique Constitution. America is a Constitutional Republic.. for any here that didn't know that. The reason why America has
failed is because these so-called leaders have abandoned our Constitution in favor of the Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Clinton, and Obama style socialism.
Liberals will all take delight in knowing that people here support this political ideology. Promoting -- overt -- Nazi-style socialism will only expedite our demise and remove all "legitimacy" from our struggle.
Think about it.
Why would anybody here support a political ideology that supports: bigger government, welfare, higher taxes, niggers, pregnant beaners, reduction/elimination of the 1st and 2nd Amendments, open borders, diversity, affirmative action, gay marriage, and everything else that is destructive.
That's what socialists support today and every other example of socialism in Europe has failed -- including Hitler's brand. Hell, the concept and book was written by a Jew (Marx). Scum like Obama, Clinton, Rev. Al/Jesse, and even the closet socialist "W" support this. Do you want to be aligned with these people? What made America great wasn't socialism but our unique Constitution. America is a Constitutional Republic.. for any here that didn't know that.
The reason why America hasfailed is because these so-called leaders have abandoned our Constitution in favor of the Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Clinton, and Obama style socialism.
Liberals will all take delight in knowing that people here support this political ideology.
Promoting -- overt -- Nazi-style socialism will only expedite our demise and remove all "legitimacy" from our struggle.Think about it.
Rasp
Senior Editor
What is National Socialism?
National Socialism is, above all things, the doctrine that it is not only for the good of humanity but absolutely essential for the survival of humanity that scientific method be applied not only to the breeding of animals and bugs but also to the breeding of human beings.
National Socialism does not wish to destroy inferior races or individuals any more than a wolf leader wants to destroy the pack but only to organize them into a productive order which alone can enable them to survive and enjoy some degree of human felicity.
National Socialism deplores the reversal of human evolution being accelerated by welfare-ism, brotherhood-ism, race-mixing and the unlimited breeding of the inferior races and individuals while the superior lim
it themselves to few offspring or none.
To accomplish these utterly fundamental and vital aims, National Socialism declares its goal to be nothing less than the absolute domination of the white, civilized areas of the earth by the Aryan white man and the leadership of the Aryan white man by the strongest and wisest individuals of the race rather than the largest number of weaklings, mediocrity's and selfish private interests.
To achieve this goal National Socialism recognizes that power must be won legally, first in the strategic center of the world, the United States, and then in all the other white Aryan areas of the earth.
National Socialism does not recognize the imaginary geographic boundaries of nations as being as important as the very real boundaries set by nature in RACE.
We therefore declare out intention eventually to incorporate all Nordic and Aryan white peoples into a single political entity so that never again will white men fight and kill each other on behalf of s
uch silly things as imaginary geographic boundaries or such vicious things as Jewish economic swindles-either Communism or capitalism.
We further declare that we do not seek to murder or destroy any race but only that we intend to establish separate areas within which each race will be at liberty to achieve its own destiny so long as it does not encroach upon or attack the areas or members of another race.
Finally, we declare our intention of exiling all individuals, OF WHATEVER RACE, who are guilty of organizing, planning, or carrying out the criminal Communist conspiracy and mutiny against humanity and the laws of nature. We recognize a great proportion of Jews have been, and are the leaders of this criminal Bolshevik mutiny and conspiracy against the race of humanity and will not shrink from the task of utterly destroying such poisonous human bacteria.
But this is only the negative part of our ideals and aims. The goal of a National Socialist (is to) develop and express his contributio
ns to humanity to the maximum possible extent and by the application of scientific method to human breeding itself, to insure that the world is peopled, not with more and more negroid degenerates, but with human beings who increasingly approximate the lordly ideal expressed in the ancient Nordic sagas by the gods and goddesses of Valhalla.
Rasp
Senior Editor
Police prepare for National Socialist rally, convention in St. Louis
:Swastika2:
ST. LOUIS — Police will be on heightened alert this weekend as white supremacists from around the country gather here for a rally and convention.
The National Socialist Movement, which bills itself as "America's Nazi Party," will hold a rally from 2 to 4 p.m. Saturday under the Gateway Arch.
Starting at 2:30 p.m. Saturday, a collection of clergy and human rights associations intend to hold a response rally in Forest Park.
The National Socialists are considered the largest neo-Nazi organization in the country. The group also plans to hold a conference, commemorating the 35th anniversary of its founding, at an undisclosed location in the St. Louis
area.
Steven Boswell, the group's Missouri leader, said he doesn't expect any altercations. "We always expect a peaceful rally," he said. "We ourselves are peaceful."
Opponents of the group also discourage confronting the Nazi group face to face.
A police department spokesperson said the same unit that handles Mardi Gras and other events is planning security for the neo-Nazi rally. For safety reasons, the department is not releasing details of its plans.
During the Arch rally, the Anti-Defamation Leaguewill, weather permitting, host a unity event with other groups on Art Hill in Forest Park.
The National Socialists subscribe to an anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic ideology. They have been active in the Midwest, particularly in Missouri. Recently, the group "adopted" a stretch of highway in Springfield, Mo., as part of the state's litter cleanup program.
In 2007, several on-lookers
were arrested amid skirmishes with the group at a march in Columbia, Mo. Last year, the city denied the party a parade permit because police could not handle the march and a University of Missouri football game scheduled on the same day.
:Swastika2:
Smedley Butler
Senior Reporter
Back to HOW WARS ARE MADE | Issues index | CDR Home
Germany and England
by: Nesta Webster
Prefatory comments by Jackie P.
THIS is the little book that opened my eyes about the mass of massive lies we've all been told about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it's Chancellor, Adolf Hitler.
To my mind the greatest lie was that "Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nations". In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world. The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted.
The group promulgating that big lie was successful in its efforts to instill a deep sense of both fear and hatred of the man who wanted only to restore some of the areas of land th
at had been sliced out of Germany by the Versailles Treaty after WWI, bring the German people back into the fold of their natural country borders, and protect western Europe from the Communist/Bolshevik tyranny threatening to wreak its havoc throughout the continent, and the world.
In another small book titled, The Nameless War, Captain A. H. M. Ramsay gives convincing evidence of the above statement. For some of our readers this will be a turning point (as it was for me). The more lies you uncover, the more truth you desire. Those of you who would rather remain blissfully ignorant will leave now. Those of you who know the truth and hate the truth will be frothing at the mouth that the lies are being exposed.
Captain Ramsay was a veteran of the first World War, a former member of His Majesty's Guard, and -- at the time of his arrest and imprisonment -- a member of the British Parliament. He was arrested without formal charges and thrown into Brixton Prison for nearly three years becau
se he discovered and attempted to reveal the culprits who were clamoring for, orchestrating and promulgating what became the Second World War.
Nobody wanted war in England or Germany except Winston Churchill and the War Hawks who controlled him and the press (just like in the U.S. of A. then and today). When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a trip to Germany where he had entered into one-on-one conversations with Chancellor Hitler, he announced to the Parliament and the British people that "there will be no war".
Behind the exuberant celebrations of the people in both Germany and England, the planners went to work. Inside of one week, the controlled press was printing lies about the Prime Minister and began clamoring for his resignation. He was blamed for a military blunder that had actually been committed under Churchill's orders as Admiral of the Navy. Instead of Churchill standing accused, it was Mr. Chamberlain.
Chamberlain was out; Churchill was in, and on the
very evening of the day Churchill became Prime Minister (May 11, 1941), England began indiscriminate bombing of Germany. . . homes, churches, schools, hospitals, slaughtering defenseless men, women and children (just like the U.S. has done in Afghanistan, Iraq, and dozens of other nations).
The situation is the same now as it was then, and the same unseen hand at work today is the same force behind every revolution and war carried out since time immemorial. . . the English Revolution in the 1600's (which resulted in the entrenchment of the Bank of England); the French Revolution, Russian Revolution (creation of the U.S.S.R), and the foiled (thanks to Mussolini and Hitler) Spanish revolution which Mrs. Webster relates in this book.
Germany and England was presented to me by a friend in her senior years, along with several boxes of books she had been accumulating over the past four decades. As I sat reading this book, in the privacy of my home, I was silently (and sometimes audibly) ga
sping in shock at the revelations herein.
First, Mrs. Webster's reference to the 'Jews' who controlled the U.S.S.R. and whose minions were over-running western Europe and literally running Germany under the Weimar Republic created a first-impression that she was "anti-Semitic". Until that time, any information sent or given to me about the Jews, was set aside without a glance, believing that the givers of this information were 'Jew haters'. I wasn't. And I'm not today.
However, there is no denying that the plan for World Dominion is a millenia-old plan, and those born into the 'religion' of Talmudism (they call themselves Jews) are being used by their Elders to push the plan -- along with tens of millions of "Christian-Zionists". The word 'religion' is emphasized, because Judaism is not a religion, according to Moses Mendelsohn, a learned Jew well-known and respected by Jews. Mendelsohn said that:
"Judaism is not a religion, it is a LAW, religionized".
While researching and writing the book-in-progress titled "Jewish Persecution", it became clear that Mendelsohn meant what he said, and it is true. There is no such religion as Judaism anyway; the religion is 'Talmudism' or 'Pharisaism'. It IS a LAW which contains the plan for World Dominion, and it is well-hidden 'neath its cloak of religion.
Second, Mrs. Webster's comments about and quoted statements by Adolf Hitler presented an absolutely shocking portrait of an individual whose words -- and more importantly, his actions -- spoke volumes for his love of Germany and her people, as well as his abhorrence for the Jews who had spoiled Germany mentally, emotionally and morally, while totally devastating the economy and well-being of the German population. They controlled the banks (economy), the government, education, the press, and entertainment (just like today in America).
Unfortunately, their 'lesser brethren' Jews were always the brunt of the machinations of their Elders,
as told by Benjamin Freedman in his speech to a group of people in the late 1960's. When you read that speech, if you haven't already, you see parts of it could have been a speech made fairly recently. He mentioned the forces building toward World War III by the orchestrated unrest in the Middle East.
The historical preview given at the beginning of the first chapter was confusing and little understood by me on the first reading. That is because I had NO knowledge or understanding of the history of the meddlesome creatures who call themselves Jews, and who have succeeded in infiltrating every government and nation that has ultimately been destroyed by their machinations.
If the reader takes a look at the names and backgrounds of individuals in very high places in the U.S. (and now state governments) today, it will become obvious that Jews -- who purportedly constitute only 3% of the U.S. population -- hold disproportionate numbers of positions of great power and influence in administ
rative, legislative and judicial branches of government, as well as all branches of the military under the Department of Defense. Not only that, they are advisors, speech-writers, and so forth, to non-Jews in high places.
If our reader is in the beginning stages of awakening to the lies, it may be helpful to return to the beginning of chapter one for a re-read after finishing the book. That may be totally unnecessary and maybe I only suggest it because I realized on the second reading that I had not fully understood those first few pages of pre-history review the first time 'round.
We present Germany and England for your reading with deep gratitude to Karen A., who transcribed it for us. . . for you.
The book from which this was transcribed showed no publication date. It was apparently taken from the paper or newsletter Mrs. Nester published, titled "The Patriot" (as referenced below the title). In this writing she alluded to the "England of 1938. . ." as well as a quote b
y Adolf Hitler in October, 1938, so we are fixing the date of writing in late 1938 or very early 1939.
-- Jackie
July 11th, 2003
P.S. Just before sending this to our webmaster (and he IS a "master" webmaster), Darren Weeks, we received a forward from a BBC item on the death of a Lord Shawcross, who led the British prosecution at the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal. The following statement attributed to Shawcross is relevant and confirms the information Mrs. Webster presents in Germany and England. We have not seen the speech given at Stourbridge. If our reader has access to the entire speech we would appreciate notification. Thank you.
July 28th, 2003
_______________________________________________
Sir Hartley Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16, 1984
"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleagues condemned Nazi Aggr
ession and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war.
But we [England] declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' around Roosevelt.
We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentlessly pursued now, only under a different label."
______________________________________________________
Germany and England
By Nesta H. Webster
Reprinted from THE PATRIOT, OCTOBER and NOVEMBER, 138, and Revised.
_______________________________________________
Foreword
For the benefit of the younger generation or of foreigners who, never having read “Tril
by,”� may fail to understand the meaning of the frontispiece to the book, it should be explained that the famous novel of this name, written and illustrated by the late George du Maurier, which appeared in 1894, described the history of an artist’s model named Trilby in the Quartier Latin of Paris, who, without any natural voice, was hypnotized to sing by a clever Jewish musician named Svengali, and fell completely under his power.
The point in reproducing it here is to show that the British people are being hypnotized to repeat the phrases put into their mouths at the wave of a conductor’s baton.
Herr Hitler in October, 1938 [said]:
“England would be well advised to stop governessing Europe.”�
GERMANY AND ENGLAND
I. THE VOLTE FACE.
To the dispassionate observer who happens to possess a memory, nothing is more extraordinary than the paroxysm of fury and suspicion with regard to Germany’s intentions which broke out last spring in our countr
y where -- until five years ago -- pro-Germanism was de rigueur in “intellectual”� and so-called “advanced”� circles.
This kind of pro-Germanism was of long standing. It was seen after the Franco-Prussian War when The Times of 18 November, 1870, gave prominence to Carlyle’s letter deploring the “cheap pity and newspaper lamentation over fallen and afflicted France”� and ending with the fervent hope that “noble, patient, deep, pious and solid Germany should be at length wielded into a nation and become Queen of the Continent.”�
Before the Great War [WWI] when the hostile intentions of Germany toward the British Empire were clearly evident; when German officers were drinking to “der Tag,”� [the Day] whilst German writers openly committed their plans for world power to paper and incident after incident showed that war was inevitable, all those who warned our country were derided or insulted. It was even suggested that Lord Roberts should be deprived of his pension for con
ducting his campaign for National Service.
The Day -- when it at last arrived -- was hailed with rapture by the German people. The women threw their hats into the air with joy and the Daily Mail of 3 August 1914, published a photograph of a whole London street filled with young Germans cheering for war.
Meanwhile the same sort of crowds of Socialists and Pacifists who have recently been parading London shouting for war with Germany were then agitating for non-resistance to German aggression.
Even when the grey legions of Germany were marching through Belgium and Flanders on their way to these shores, the Socialists held meetings of protest against national defence, and the reluctance to fight engendered by their propaganda proved a serious check to recruiting. All this when we were at war with an autocracy headed by an Emperor with a ruling caste of Junkers to whom Socialism in any form was abhorrent!
This anti-patriotic campaign was maintained throughout the Wa
r and the fifteen years that followed it. Socialists, Communists and Pacifists continued to clamour for greater gentleness to be shown to Germany, declaring that we had “been mad to fight”� her and that the Treaty of Versailles should be torn up.
In Liberal, and even in Conservative circles, the same sentiments were frequently expressed –
“the Germans are our natural allies; in the next war we hope we shall be marching with them against France.”�
It must be admitted that the incivility sometimes shown to British travelers to France had something to do with these sentiments. Indeed, towards 1930, especially after Mr. Philip Snowden accused France of “bilking her obligations,”� feelings between the two countries had become so bitter that those of us who loved France lived in dread of an open rapture with her.
It was but natural that France, having suffered twice within fifty years from invasion by German armies, should fear and distrust Germany’s furt
her intentions more profoundly than England whose soil had never been trodden by a foreign foe since 1066 and that she [France] found some difficulty in believing that Germany had undergone that “change of heart”� of which our Socialists and Pacifists spoke with so much assurance.
For, as all well-informed people in this country were aware, the spirit of militarism had not been crushed in Germany. Military associations were openly drilling, secret societies aiming at a war of revenge were formed, stores of ammunition were being secretly piled up.
At the same time close co-operation took place between the “Eastern”� school of German militarists and Soviet Russia, Bolshevik propaganda emanated from Berlin as well as from Moscow, the Communist Party of Germany was the largest in the world outside Russia and in all countries Communism aimed particularly at the destruction of France and of the British Empire.
All this was shown in my Surrender of an Empire (in 1931) agains
t which a boycott was organised in the Press. In those days it was “French militarism”� which had become the bogey of our Pacifists just as in France the perfidy of England became the theme of certain French writers.
I remember during that period attending a meeting in London of a certain association which purported to arrange debates and discussions on world politics from a non-party point of view, which, as usual, meant that only “Left”� views were given a fair hearing.
On this occasion a German had been invited to speak, and be held forth at great length on the grievances of Germany, observing that, although he himself was not a Nazi, Nazi-ism was but the natural outcome of German resentment at the policy of disarmament imposed on Germany by the Allies.
This was received with sympathy by the audience, a member of which rose at the end of the address and said:
“I am the Bishop of ____ and I am sure that everyone here must feel ashamed of the way in whic
h we are disarming Germany whilst we ourselves are continuing to arm.”�
As no one dissented it was evident that this sentiment was shared by all those present. Not one person in that crowded hall rose to observe that we had just scrapped a number of cruisers and were disarming – as is now generally admitted – to the point of danger.
Now, today a leading official of that same association is trumpeting an appeal for an increased national defence against the German menace!
If Germany at the present time considers she has grievances, and that the Treaty of Versailles should be scrapped in favour of a policy more in accord with calm judgment and altered circumstances, how can she be blamed by those who formerly encouraged her to think she had greater grievances than those she now puts forward?
Either they were wrong then or they are wrong now; in either case we should not be guided by their opinion.
Now we -- who were never pro-Germans in the sense
of seeking peace at any price and of endangering the security of our own country, but who held, on the contrary, that in view of the disturbed state of Europe we must remain fully armed -- nevertheless recognised that many errors had been made in the Peace Treaties. It is clear that the policy of forcing Germany with the sword at her throat to admit war guilt, and the absurdity of incorporating the Covenant of the League of Nations in the Treaty of Versailles, could never lead to lasting peace.
[note: the “League of Nations”�, formerly the 'League to Enforce Peace', is now known as the “United Nations”�]
Again and again revisions of the Treaties were demanded by the Germans and their friends in this country but when Hitler, finding that nothing was to be gained by arbitration, decided to take the law into his own hands, the Socialists and Pacifists who from 1914 to 1933 had pleaded the cause of Germany, raised a howl of execration and declared that the Treaties must now be enforced
even at the cost of war.
What happened to bring about their change of front? The accession of Hitler to power. Now Hitler had in the past shown himself, at moments, as a fire-brand. But how often have we been told in the case of our own Socialists that office “sobers”�?
It certainly seemed to do so in the case of Hitler, who, once in control of his country, abandoned his aggressive attitude toward the Allies. But at the same time he put down Bolshevism and took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews.
By these measures it was not only Germany that profited but the two greatest dangers to our country were removed. For the support given to Germany by “International Finance,”� which would have enabled her to defray the cost of another war at any moment, was withdrawn and the link between Germany and Soviet Russia was broken.
The floods of Bolshevist propaganda flowing from Berlin into all parts of the British Empire were checked at their source. T
he resentment of the German people towards the Allies as the cause of all their sufferings gave way to passionate enthusiasm for a leader who set out to restore their country by constructive methods.
The old Pan-German dream of world power was replaced by a Nationalist scheme for the union of all German peoples under one head, leaving the peoples of other countries to work out their own destinies.
Then was the moment for the ending of war hates and of peace between the nation which, throughout thirteen years of endless congresses and assemblies, had been the professed aim of European statesmen, of the talkers at Geneva and countless Pacifist associations.
Then was the moment for the whole civilized world, which for fifteen years had been tossed on the waves of unrest set in motion by Moscow, to see in Hitler, as it should have seen in Mussolini, a saviour from the greatest enemy of the human race – the hideous system of tyranny which threatened to spread itself into every
country, well stigmatized by Mr. Winston Churchill at its onset as “the bloody baboonery”� of Bolshevism.
Instead of this Hitler was reviled, as Mussolini had been reviled after he had saved Italy from the grip of the Red octopus. Such is the power of the Press, and of mass hypnotism exercised over the minds of the British public that they were now made to regard Hitler as their mortal enemy.
Yet in the place of an autocratic Emperor at the head of a military caste and of a warlike German nation, we were faced by a ruler who, although a dictator, represents the will of 90 per cent of the population, a plain man of the people, an ardent social reformer, too Socialistic for us but clearly sincere, a leader who whilst restoring the confidence and self-respect of the German people has quelled in them the spirit of hatred towards our country.
Instead of young Germans cheering for war in the streets of London we have had the youth of Germany cheering Mr. Chamberlain as the mes
senger of peace through the streets of Munich.
And this was the moment when we were told that a world war was inevitable in order to crush the “German menace.”�
Next - Chapter 2: "Governessing England"
Back to HOW WARS ARE MADE | Issues index | CDR Home
Germany and England
by: Nesta Webster
Prefatory comments by Jackie P.
THIS is the little book that opened my eyes about the mass of massive lies we've all been told about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it's Chancellor, Adolf Hitler.
To my mind the greatest lie was that "Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nations". In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world. The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted.
The group promulgating that big lie was successful in its efforts to instill a deep sense of both fear and hatred of the man who wanted only to restore some of the areas of land th
at had been sliced out of Germany by the Versailles Treaty after WWI, bring the German people back into the fold of their natural country borders, and protect western Europe from the Communist/Bolshevik tyranny threatening to wreak its havoc throughout the continent, and the world.
In another small book titled, The Nameless War, Captain A. H. M. Ramsay gives convincing evidence of the above statement. For some of our readers this will be a turning point (as it was for me). The more lies you uncover, the more truth you desire. Those of you who would rather remain blissfully ignorant will leave now. Those of you who know the truth and hate the truth will be frothing at the mouth that the lies are being exposed.
Captain Ramsay was a veteran of the first World War, a former member of His Majesty's Guard, and -- at the time of his arrest and imprisonment -- a member of the British Parliament. He was arrested without formal charges and thrown into Brixton Prison for nearly three years becau
se he discovered and attempted to reveal the culprits who were clamoring for, orchestrating and promulgating what became the Second World War.
Nobody wanted war in England or Germany except Winston Churchill and the War Hawks who controlled him and the press (just like in the U.S. of A. then and today). When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a trip to Germany where he had entered into one-on-one conversations with Chancellor Hitler, he announced to the Parliament and the British people that "there will be no war".
Behind the exuberant celebrations of the people in both Germany and England, the planners went to work. Inside of one week, the controlled press was printing lies about the Prime Minister and began clamoring for his resignation. He was blamed for a military blunder that had actually been committed under Churchill's orders as Admiral of the Navy. Instead of Churchill standing accused, it was Mr. Chamberlain.
Chamberlain was out; Churchill was in, and on the
very evening of the day Churchill became Prime Minister (May 11, 1941), England began indiscriminate bombing of Germany. . . homes, churches, schools, hospitals, slaughtering defenseless men, women and children (just like the U.S. has done in Afghanistan, Iraq, and dozens of other nations).
The situation is the same now as it was then, and the same unseen hand at work today is the same force behind every revolution and war carried out since time immemorial. . . the English Revolution in the 1600's (which resulted in the entrenchment of the Bank of England); the French Revolution, Russian Revolution (creation of the U.S.S.R), and the foiled (thanks to Mussolini and Hitler) Spanish revolution which Mrs. Webster relates in this book.
Germany and England was presented to me by a friend in her senior years, along with several boxes of books she had been accumulating over the past four decades. As I sat reading this book, in the privacy of my home, I was silently (and sometimes audibly) ga
sping in shock at the revelations herein.
First, Mrs. Webster's reference to the 'Jews' who controlled the U.S.S.R. and whose minions were over-running western Europe and literally running Germany under the Weimar Republic created a first-impression that she was "anti-Semitic". Until that time, any information sent or given to me about the Jews, was set aside without a glance, believing that the givers of this information were 'Jew haters'. I wasn't. And I'm not today.
However, there is no denying that the plan for World Dominion is a millenia-old plan, and those born into the 'religion' of Talmudism (they call themselves Jews) are being used by their Elders to push the plan -- along with tens of millions of "Christian-Zionists". The word 'religion' is emphasized, because Judaism is not a religion, according to Moses Mendelsohn, a learned Jew well-known and respected by Jews. Mendelsohn said that:
"Judaism is not a religion, it is a LAW, religionized".
While researching and writing the book-in-progress titled "Jewish Persecution", it became clear that Mendelsohn meant what he said, and it is true. There is no such religion as Judaism anyway; the religion is 'Talmudism' or 'Pharisaism'. It IS a LAW which contains the plan for World Dominion, and it is well-hidden 'neath its cloak of religion.
Second, Mrs. Webster's comments about and quoted statements by Adolf Hitler presented an absolutely shocking portrait of an individual whose words -- and more importantly, his actions -- spoke volumes for his love of Germany and her people, as well as his abhorrence for the Jews who had spoiled Germany mentally, emotionally and morally, while totally devastating the economy and well-being of the German population. They controlled the banks (economy), the government, education, the press, and entertainment (just like today in America).
Unfortunately, their 'lesser brethren' Jews were always the brunt of the machinations of their Elders,
as told by Benjamin Freedman in his speech to a group of people in the late 1960's. When you read that speech, if you haven't already, you see parts of it could have been a speech made fairly recently. He mentioned the forces building toward World War III by the orchestrated unrest in the Middle East.
The historical preview given at the beginning of the first chapter was confusing and little understood by me on the first reading. That is because I had NO knowledge or understanding of the history of the meddlesome creatures who call themselves Jews, and who have succeeded in infiltrating every government and nation that has ultimately been destroyed by their machinations.
If the reader takes a look at the names and backgrounds of individuals in very high places in the U.S. (and now state governments) today, it will become obvious that Jews -- who purportedly constitute only 3% of the U.S. population -- hold disproportionate numbers of positions of great power and influence in administ
rative, legislative and judicial branches of government, as well as all branches of the military under the Department of Defense. Not only that, they are advisors, speech-writers, and so forth, to non-Jews in high places.
If our reader is in the beginning stages of awakening to the lies, it may be helpful to return to the beginning of chapter one for a re-read after finishing the book. That may be totally unnecessary and maybe I only suggest it because I realized on the second reading that I had not fully understood those first few pages of pre-history review the first time 'round.
We present Germany and England for your reading with deep gratitude to Karen A., who transcribed it for us. . . for you.
The book from which this was transcribed showed no publication date. It was apparently taken from the paper or newsletter Mrs. Nester published, titled "The Patriot" (as referenced below the title). In this writing she alluded to the "England of 1938. . ." as well as a quote b
y Adolf Hitler in October, 1938, so we are fixing the date of writing in late 1938 or very early 1939.
-- Jackie
July 11th, 2003
P.S. Just before sending this to our webmaster (and he IS a "master" webmaster), Darren Weeks, we received a forward from a BBC item on the death of a Lord Shawcross, who led the British prosecution at the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal. The following statement attributed to Shawcross is relevant and confirms the information Mrs. Webster presents in Germany and England. We have not seen the speech given at Stourbridge. If our reader has access to the entire speech we would appreciate notification. Thank you.
July 28th, 2003
_______________________________________________
Sir Hartley Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16, 1984
"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleagues condemned Nazi Aggr
ession and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war.
But we [England] declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' around Roosevelt.
We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentlessly pursued now, only under a different label."
______________________________________________________
Germany and England
By Nesta H. Webster
Reprinted from THE PATRIOT, OCTOBER and NOVEMBER, 138, and Revised.
_______________________________________________
Foreword
For the benefit of the younger generation or of foreigners who, never having read “Tril
by,”� may fail to understand the meaning of the frontispiece to the book, it should be explained that the famous novel of this name, written and illustrated by the late George du Maurier, which appeared in 1894, described the history of an artist’s model named Trilby in the Quartier Latin of Paris, who, without any natural voice, was hypnotized to sing by a clever Jewish musician named Svengali, and fell completely under his power.
The point in reproducing it here is to show that the British people are being hypnotized to repeat the phrases put into their mouths at the wave of a conductor’s baton.
Herr Hitler in October, 1938 [said]:
“England would be well advised to stop governessing Europe.”�
GERMANY AND ENGLAND
I. THE VOLTE FACE.
To the dispassionate observer who happens to possess a memory, nothing is more extraordinary than the paroxysm of fury and suspicion with regard to Germany’s intentions which broke out last spring in our countr
y where -- until five years ago -- pro-Germanism was de rigueur in “intellectual”� and so-called “advanced”� circles.
This kind of pro-Germanism was of long standing. It was seen after the Franco-Prussian War when The Times of 18 November, 1870, gave prominence to Carlyle’s letter deploring the “cheap pity and newspaper lamentation over fallen and afflicted France”� and ending with the fervent hope that “noble, patient, deep, pious and solid Germany should be at length wielded into a nation and become Queen of the Continent.”�
Before the Great War [WWI] when the hostile intentions of Germany toward the British Empire were clearly evident; when German officers were drinking to “der Tag,”� [the Day] whilst German writers openly committed their plans for world power to paper and incident after incident showed that war was inevitable, all those who warned our country were derided or insulted. It was even suggested that Lord Roberts should be deprived of his pension for con
ducting his campaign for National Service.
The Day -- when it at last arrived -- was hailed with rapture by the German people. The women threw their hats into the air with joy and the Daily Mail of 3 August 1914, published a photograph of a whole London street filled with young Germans cheering for war.
Meanwhile the same sort of crowds of Socialists and Pacifists who have recently been parading London shouting for war with Germany were then agitating for non-resistance to German aggression.
Even when the grey legions of Germany were marching through Belgium and Flanders on their way to these shores, the Socialists held meetings of protest against national defence, and the reluctance to fight engendered by their propaganda proved a serious check to recruiting. All this when we were at war with an autocracy headed by an Emperor with a ruling caste of Junkers to whom Socialism in any form was abhorrent!
This anti-patriotic campaign was maintained throughout the Wa
r and the fifteen years that followed it. Socialists, Communists and Pacifists continued to clamour for greater gentleness to be shown to Germany, declaring that we had “been mad to fight”� her and that the Treaty of Versailles should be torn up.
In Liberal, and even in Conservative circles, the same sentiments were frequently expressed –
“the Germans are our natural allies; in the next war we hope we shall be marching with them against France.”�
It must be admitted that the incivility sometimes shown to British travelers to France had something to do with these sentiments. Indeed, towards 1930, especially after Mr. Philip Snowden accused France of “bilking her obligations,”� feelings between the two countries had become so bitter that those of us who loved France lived in dread of an open rapture with her.
It was but natural that France, having suffered twice within fifty years from invasion by German armies, should fear and distrust Germany’s furt
her intentions more profoundly than England whose soil had never been trodden by a foreign foe since 1066 and that she [France] found some difficulty in believing that Germany had undergone that “change of heart”� of which our Socialists and Pacifists spoke with so much assurance.
For, as all well-informed people in this country were aware, the spirit of militarism had not been crushed in Germany. Military associations were openly drilling, secret societies aiming at a war of revenge were formed, stores of ammunition were being secretly piled up.
At the same time close co-operation took place between the “Eastern”� school of German militarists and Soviet Russia, Bolshevik propaganda emanated from Berlin as well as from Moscow, the Communist Party of Germany was the largest in the world outside Russia and in all countries Communism aimed particularly at the destruction of France and of the British Empire.
All this was shown in my Surrender of an Empire (in 1931) agains
t which a boycott was organised in the Press. In those days it was “French militarism”� which had become the bogey of our Pacifists just as in France the perfidy of England became the theme of certain French writers.
I remember during that period attending a meeting in London of a certain association which purported to arrange debates and discussions on world politics from a non-party point of view, which, as usual, meant that only “Left”� views were given a fair hearing.
On this occasion a German had been invited to speak, and be held forth at great length on the grievances of Germany, observing that, although he himself was not a Nazi, Nazi-ism was but the natural outcome of German resentment at the policy of disarmament imposed on Germany by the Allies.
This was received with sympathy by the audience, a member of which rose at the end of the address and said:
“I am the Bishop of ____ and I am sure that everyone here must feel ashamed of the way in whic
h we are disarming Germany whilst we ourselves are continuing to arm.”�
As no one dissented it was evident that this sentiment was shared by all those present. Not one person in that crowded hall rose to observe that we had just scrapped a number of cruisers and were disarming – as is now generally admitted – to the point of danger.
Now, today a leading official of that same association is trumpeting an appeal for an increased national defence against the German menace!
If Germany at the present time considers she has grievances, and that the Treaty of Versailles should be scrapped in favour of a policy more in accord with calm judgment and altered circumstances, how can she be blamed by those who formerly encouraged her to think she had greater grievances than those she now puts forward?
Either they were wrong then or they are wrong now; in either case we should not be guided by their opinion.
Now we -- who were never pro-Germans in the sense
of seeking peace at any price and of endangering the security of our own country, but who held, on the contrary, that in view of the disturbed state of Europe we must remain fully armed -- nevertheless recognised that many errors had been made in the Peace Treaties. It is clear that the policy of forcing Germany with the sword at her throat to admit war guilt, and the absurdity of incorporating the Covenant of the League of Nations in the Treaty of Versailles, could never lead to lasting peace.
[note: the “League of Nations”�, formerly the 'League to Enforce Peace', is now known as the “United Nations”�]
Again and again revisions of the Treaties were demanded by the Germans and their friends in this country but when Hitler, finding that nothing was to be gained by arbitration, decided to take the law into his own hands, the Socialists and Pacifists who from 1914 to 1933 had pleaded the cause of Germany, raised a howl of execration and declared that the Treaties must now be enforced
even at the cost of war.
What happened to bring about their change of front? The accession of Hitler to power. Now Hitler had in the past shown himself, at moments, as a fire-brand. But how often have we been told in the case of our own Socialists that office “sobers”�?
It certainly seemed to do so in the case of Hitler, who, once in control of his country, abandoned his aggressive attitude toward the Allies. But at the same time he put down Bolshevism and took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews.
By these measures it was not only Germany that profited but the two greatest dangers to our country were removed. For the support given to Germany by “International Finance,”� which would have enabled her to defray the cost of another war at any moment, was withdrawn and the link between Germany and Soviet Russia was broken.
The floods of Bolshevist propaganda flowing from Berlin into all parts of the British Empire were checked at their source. T
he resentment of the German people towards the Allies as the cause of all their sufferings gave way to passionate enthusiasm for a leader who set out to restore their country by constructive methods.
The old Pan-German dream of world power was replaced by a Nationalist scheme for the union of all German peoples under one head, leaving the peoples of other countries to work out their own destinies.
Then was the moment for the ending of war hates and of peace between the nation which, throughout thirteen years of endless congresses and assemblies, had been the professed aim of European statesmen, of the talkers at Geneva and countless Pacifist associations.
Then was the moment for the whole civilized world, which for fifteen years had been tossed on the waves of unrest set in motion by Moscow, to see in Hitler, as it should have seen in Mussolini, a saviour from the greatest enemy of the human race – the hideous system of tyranny which threatened to spread itself into every
country, well stigmatized by Mr. Winston Churchill at its onset as “the bloody baboonery”� of Bolshevism.
Instead of this Hitler was reviled, as Mussolini had been reviled after he had saved Italy from the grip of the Red octopus. Such is the power of the Press, and of mass hypnotism exercised over the minds of the British public that they were now made to regard Hitler as their mortal enemy.
Yet in the place of an autocratic Emperor at the head of a military caste and of a warlike German nation, we were faced by a ruler who, although a dictator, represents the will of 90 per cent of the population, a plain man of the people, an ardent social reformer, too Socialistic for us but clearly sincere, a leader who whilst restoring the confidence and self-respect of the German people has quelled in them the spirit of hatred towards our country.
Instead of young Germans cheering for war in the streets of London we have had the youth of Germany cheering Mr. Chamberlain as the mes
senger of peace through the streets of Munich.
And this was the moment when we were told that a world war was inevitable in order to crush the “German menace.”�
Next - Chapter 2: "Governessing England"
Back to HOW WARS ARE MADE | Issues index | CDR Home