albion
Registered
Essay by Alex Linder
"Personal and Studied Reflections on the Mechanisms of Media Control"
An essay in response to the question, "When did you become aware J*ws dominated the publishing industry?"
by Alex Linder
October 1, 2004
It is comparatively easy to see that the media are controlled; it takes longer to understand the who and how and why. Having evolved from conservatism to racialism, battling J*ws and men of every shade of opinion every step of the way, I have an advanced understanding of what is going on and why the press reads the way it does. Suffice it to say, to twist Twain: the J*ws are the only people who control the media
- or need to.
My awareness that some group was enforcing blackout over the mattering facts began with a child's recognition there were Things That Could Not Be Said in newspapers. Newspaper discussion amounts to a perverse teasing, a strip club where you're bounced if you to
uch one of the dancers. Newspapers read as though constrained by law never to hit the heart of the matter, never to deal in vitals, never to come to grips with anything. If you read a week's worth of editorials, you'll never need to buy a paper again because you'll never see anything different, just endless inconsequential cycling. J*w-produced media for the goy masses equals noise without movement, like a car revving in neutral.
What first struck me about newspapers was that their writers, without exception, refrained from mentioning obvious and relevant facts, no matter they were reporting or opining. Thus, newspapers invariably gave the impression of adults playing make-believe. This made them foolish a
nd boring and dangerous. What kind of a style can be made out of truth evasion? Nothing but euphemism and stock phrase as far as the eye could see. Anything else wouldn't be safe for the powers that be. Even to combine two words unusually raises the danger of sparked thought leading to fire among de
adwood. Better to knit clichés until you hit your length. Safest for all concerned. The end result is TASS -- or the New York Times. Only news that fits the J*w's agenda gets reported honestly, and even there, as in a story about "the changing face of America," the J*ws seldom resist the urge to paint the lily. The 99% of the news that runs against the J*w agenda gets midrashed into shade. It is undeniable that the news in our papers is semitized for J*ws' protection. My gut sense, after reading a few papers, was that someone or some group was using them to disguise something, and that is in fact their main use and function.
more here ... http://www.whitealert.com/personal_and_stu...reflections.htm
"Personal and Studied Reflections on the Mechanisms of Media Control"
An essay in response to the question, "When did you become aware J*ws dominated the publishing industry?"
by Alex Linder
October 1, 2004
It is comparatively easy to see that the media are controlled; it takes longer to understand the who and how and why. Having evolved from conservatism to racialism, battling J*ws and men of every shade of opinion every step of the way, I have an advanced understanding of what is going on and why the press reads the way it does. Suffice it to say, to twist Twain: the J*ws are the only people who control the media
- or need to.
My awareness that some group was enforcing blackout over the mattering facts began with a child's recognition there were Things That Could Not Be Said in newspapers. Newspaper discussion amounts to a perverse teasing, a strip club where you're bounced if you to
uch one of the dancers. Newspapers read as though constrained by law never to hit the heart of the matter, never to deal in vitals, never to come to grips with anything. If you read a week's worth of editorials, you'll never need to buy a paper again because you'll never see anything different, just endless inconsequential cycling. J*w-produced media for the goy masses equals noise without movement, like a car revving in neutral.
What first struck me about newspapers was that their writers, without exception, refrained from mentioning obvious and relevant facts, no matter they were reporting or opining. Thus, newspapers invariably gave the impression of adults playing make-believe. This made them foolish a
nd boring and dangerous. What kind of a style can be made out of truth evasion? Nothing but euphemism and stock phrase as far as the eye could see. Anything else wouldn't be safe for the powers that be. Even to combine two words unusually raises the danger of sparked thought leading to fire among de
adwood. Better to knit clichés until you hit your length. Safest for all concerned. The end result is TASS -- or the New York Times. Only news that fits the J*w's agenda gets reported honestly, and even there, as in a story about "the changing face of America," the J*ws seldom resist the urge to paint the lily. The 99% of the news that runs against the J*w agenda gets midrashed into shade. It is undeniable that the news in our papers is semitized for J*ws' protection. My gut sense, after reading a few papers, was that someone or some group was using them to disguise something, and that is in fact their main use and function.
more here ... http://www.whitealert.com/personal_and_stu...reflections.htm