Hang In There With Ur Unique Artistic Perspective

NNN-reader

Official Poster for email reporters
Hang In There With Ur Unique Artistic Perspective, Comrade Rich!
(Apollonian, Nov. 05)


U don't have to get testy (as below-copied)--I'm the one homeless and suffering so heroically as u cruelly chortle at my pain and agony. As patriot leader-spokesman for ur somewhat peculiar market, surely out of the ordinary layman's expectation, I'd say u're outstanding artiste in ur way, artists specializing and dealing in the abstract, but it's true some artists do the same thing so steadily, so can seem they get concrete-bound. Don't forget I'm proud of the great "touch" u demonstrate for our Christian partisans and have so expressed. Don't forget also u're good at dialectic though u're so bashful in publishing. We've had numerous exchanges of which u've only published a few and most often just parts of those.

Birdman is su

rely envious I'm able to elicit these jewels of discussion with such a pa
triot comrade.

And I respect ur commitment to popularization; however I'd note at the moment so many of the goyim are still all caught up in mammon, which to them, is still producing. So yes, I sympathize w. u good comrade, but note we'll only get our message to a still-limited number of the more astute among the volk even yet, though surely more and more as Bush's popularity continues its decline. Note I can tell u some neat stories about people ("homeless") I'm forced to deal with face to face.

I'm living in a non-denominational shelter here in Tucson, unlike the last two places I was in in Corpus; things are rather harder-edged here in some ways, 100 guys crammed into a place which looks like it used to be a warehouse. People here gang up, blacks with blacks (though in Tucson there really aren't that many, actually), etc. Food is okay, but we don't get enough morning co
ffee
, and there's no noon meal.

So anyway Rich (WhiteAlert.com) note I consider u one of the more astute ty
pes to whom I as theoretician communicate so earnestly and urgently, depending upon u in turn to get the word out in ur way. Before one "popularizes," one must be careful for accuracy and precision. The irony is, as I say, I'm stuck here among so many of the outrightly goy.

Actually, I'd say u do quite brilliantly, especially lately, as I pointed out, and especially further, for ur sensitivity to the Christian and "Judeo-Christian" issues, supplying a great need where Linder/VNN falls down so miserably. Birdman is too clever; u're just right for straight-forwardness, not as hard-edged as Linder, for example. Linder--he hasn't even kept his site up since the 5th (Nov.) if u notice.

Thus as I pointed out, u're so effective at striking at the "Sadducean" component of the conspiracy, a great and crucial and essential underp
inning t
o the Jews.

Hence Rich I think I'd stress we need to be artistic rather than too details- or "concrete"-oriented. Hence for example we should emphasize cy
clic theory and Spengler, the NT conspiracy-theory/template/analytic. U've also done great with ur most recent reviews.

I didn't know that about Hoffman, that he's former Jew, but he did a great job for his book, Judaism's Strange Gods, nonetheless.

TAA is good, no doubt, but latest wasn't as good as the first one, I mean the one just before this latest just out. I thought a little poetry fm Steele would have been good, like the one titled, U knew I was a Jew. Also, I wish there'd have been more graphics, like cartoons. Steele (ConspiracyPenPal.com) is surely our finest leader for the concrete details and aspects.

No, I don't have my own computer now, hardpressed and downtrodden as I am, but Tucson is good with no filters/censors taking out racialisticals like u, Lind
er, et al.<b
r>
Rich, I don't know what happened to u, but note "Jews" are those supposedly descended fm the Judeans of Christ's day who explicitly followed the Pharisees who comprised at most a bare 15% of the
Judean population, never forget. Most of the Judeans most probably became Christian, as we know fm after 72 AD and the great Judean rebellion against Rome, the only two sects which survived being the Christians and Jews, again, these "Jews" explicitly understood as the followers of the Talmudic Pharisees.

I wouldn't lay any of the "Christian Identity" (CI) stuff on u as I really know so little about it actually, just in the first place. But I think those CI people do well as they cause questions in folk's minds about who's who and who's a Jew.

So again, to sum up, pls note u're doing outstanding in general, providing an excellent contrast to Linder/VNN.

Again, I most emphatically stress, and stressfully emphasize
given Mammonist
ic conditions, we'll still only reach a few of the most astute, so they'll surely appreciate ur natural artistry and "touch." All u need do and be then, is careful for ur accuracy and choice of topic on which to focus. NT conspiracy theory emphasizing the
idea Jews absolutely need their facilitators and cohorts, the "Sadduceans" (Falwell and Roberston, et al.) who then help to affect so adversely the Pelagianistically-inclined "elders." These elders are Bush's, Israel's, and the "neo-cons" mainstays, comrade Rich. So don't doubt I sympathize much w. ur even-handed approach; u're natural artist.

Note again NT didn't come up against the Olympic Pantheon (Zeus, Apollo, et al.) which was obsolete long before NT--the Pantheon was made obsolete precisely by Old Testament (OT) hundreds of years before NT whence people appreciated the one God with the "covenant" imposed among the people, inspiring the Roman L
aw yet. NT came up
very much against OT which had led the way and prepared things so well for NT, slaying the pagan Gods and theology for NT.

Note Jew merchants were well established in Alexandria, for example, long before NT; Jews were afflicting the pagans and West, in their typical manner, colonizing extensively there long before NT, sin
ce at least the time of Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia, unleashing the Jews upon and into the West. Thus Christian NT was really and truly very much the SYNTHESIS resulting fm the antitheses (according to Hegelian dialectic), OT and Greek reason. NT is GREEK literature, never doubt, LUKE and JOHN being Greeks, not primarily Semites.

CONCLUSION: So hang in there Rich, don't doubt I appreciate all ur outstanding efforts, so improved and effective, especially of late. Death to the Fed.
 
Back
Top