Global Caucasian Population to Plummet to Single Digit

Montrose

Registered
Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

Fr: National Policy Institute, Inc.
POB 3465
Augusta GA 30914
www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org
706-736-4884

As a percentage of world inhabitants the white population will plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of 27.98% in 1950.

The study was conducted by William H. Regnery, Mark Stradley, Dean Stradley, and the NPI Staff. The methodology is described in a footnote.

Using 2010 as the base reference the big gainer in the population derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century blacks will represent 25.38% of world population which is up dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

The other groups measured in the study were the Central Asians (Indians), East Asians (Chinese and Japanese), the Southeast Asians, Arabic (North Africa and the Middle East) and Amerindian-Mestizo (Mexican and Central America). All these groups will experience a population growth. The Chinese/Japanese and Indians will trade rankings and the relative global presence of the other groups will remain more or less constant.

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of the 7 population groups studied only whites are projected to sustain an absolute decline in numbers.

In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room and the diminished presence of whites in Europe and especially in the relatively wide open spaces North America will provide such an opportunity. Specifically countries like Canada, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

METHODOLOGY

The estimated population for each group was calculated using the figures from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0855617.html and http://www.population.com/. Example: Columbia has a population listed at 47,289,570, of which the percentages of population are listed as: mestizo 58%, white 20%, mulatto 14%, black 4%, mixed black-Amerindian 3%, Amerindian 1%. Some groups, such as Australian aborigines, black/Amerindian mix, etc. couldn’t easily be classified nor did the have enough of a population to affect the world population, and were not counted in any groups.

The estimated growth ratios of each ethnic group were calculated using the information at http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/tables.html, selection 008. This was done by taking the estimated population for each “region”��”�� (i.e. Europe for Europeans; sub-Sahara Africa for Africans; Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey for Arabs; Mexico, Guatemala, and El Salvador for Amerindians) for the years 2000, 2010, 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050 and applying the increase in population to the target year previous to get the percentage of increase. Asians have been split into three different groups: East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Mongolian, etc.), Southeast Asian (Indonesian, Malaysian, Vietnamese, Philippinos, Pacific Islanders, etc.), and Central Asian (Indians, Pakistanis, Bengalis, Kyrgizians, Kazakhs, etc.)

The percentages of increase were then applied to the estimates for their group population calculated in the first part to come up with the estimated world and group populations, as well as the percent of the world population each group would make up, for the years 2000, 2010, 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050.

Regional population estimates for 1950 came from U. N. information as carried by Wikipedia at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population#_note-4.

County population estimates were used to fine tune the regional estimates at:

http://www.xist.org/charts/population2.aspx

The Asian population was divided into three groups according to the 2000 distribution.

The population estimates and projections were calculated on an order of magnitude basis. We believe them to be representative of the trends indicated and will be pleased to make corrections b rought to our attention.

A short video of this is available at: YouTube

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2008/04/global_white_po.php
 
May 01, 2008

Whites Down To 10% Of World Population By 2060— Does It Matter?
By Patrick J. Buchanan

"This is the way the world ends/Not with a bang but a whimper," wrote T.S. Eliot in the closing couplet of "The Hollow Men."

Eliot's poem was written after the Great War of 1914-1918 had carried off 9 million soldiers, wounded twice as many more, brought down the Romanov, Hohenzollern and Habsburg empires, and ushered onto the world stage Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini and, soon, Adolf Hitler.

Readers have ascribed various meanings to Eliot's words. One college professor of English suggested Eliot was looking back to the "whimper" in the cradle in Bethlehem that signaled the end of the old world, the Pax Romana, and the coming of the new Christian age.

Some saw it as the whimper of a man facing the executioner's axe. Others say Eliot was referring to the middle-aged protagonist of The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, who had "measured out my life with coffee spoons" and soon would "wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled."

Recent reports suggest God has another end in store for us.

An Augusta, Ga., group, The National Policy Institute, has meshed the figures on fertility rates with the continents and races on Planet Earth—to visualize what the world will look like in 2060. [Global White Population To Plummet, download it here.]

In 1950, whites were 28 percent of world population and Africans 9 percent, a ratio of three-to-one. In 2060, the ratio will remain the same. But the colors will be reversed. People of African ancestry will be 25 percent of the world's population. People of European descent will have fallen to 9.8 percent.

More arresting is that the white population is shrinking not only in relative but in absolute terms. Two hundred million white people, one in every six on earth—a number equal to the entire population of France, Britain, Holland and Germany—will vanish by 2060.

The Caucasian race is going the way of the Mohicans.

Arabic peoples, 94 million at the birth of Israel in 1948, outnumbered seven to one by Europeans, will rise to 743 million in 2060, a tenfold increase, and will be 75 percent of the white population.

Fleshing out the NPI picture is the U.N. population survey of mid-2007 that points to the 21st century disappearance of Western Man.

By 2050, a fourth of all the people of Eastern Europe will have vanished. Ukraine will lose one-third of its population. Russia, 150 million at the breakup of the Soviet Union, 142 million today, will be down to 108 million.

Such losses dwarf what Hitler and Stalin together did to these countries.

CIA Director Michael Hayden said this week that Russia will have to import workers from the Caucasus, Central Asia and China, exacerbating already serious racial and religious tensions in a nation with thousands of nuclear weapons.

With Russians east of the Urals outnumbered 100 to one by the Chinese, there is little doubt who will control the oil, gas, gold and timber of Siberia and be staring hungrily across the Bering Strait at Alaska.

By 2050, Iran's population will have risen from today's 71 million to 100 million. Pakistan will add 84 million to reach almost 300 million, the U.S. population today. Afghanistan's population will triple from 27 million to 79 million. Iraq's will go from 29 million to 62 million. The destinies of these nations will be beyond the capacity of an aging, dwindling, dying West to dictate.

The U.N. statistics, however, show the populations of Northern, Western and Southern Europe stabilizing or falling only slightly.

How can this be when only Iceland and Albania have fertility rates—2.1 children per woman—that can stop population declines, and all the rest have birthrates that would put bears, birds and wolves on the endangered species list?

Answer: Western Europe's populations are being sustained by immigrants from the Maghreb and Middle East, Asia and Africa—and the baby boom among these black and brown peoples is lifting and changing the face of the Old Continent forever. Islam is returning to Iberia, Italy and the Balkans. The Third World is coming to colonize the mother countries.

And America? According to the Pew Research Center, the Hispanic population of the United States will triple to 127 million by 2050, as Mexico's population grows to 130 million. An erasure of the U.S. border, or merger of the two countries, or the linguistic, cultural and social annexation of the American Southwest by Mexico appears fated.

Yet, last October, in another Pew poll of 45,000 people in 47 countries, a majority in 46 expressed fear of a loss of their traditional culture.

Sixty-two percent of Americans told Pew we should do more to protect our way of life. Three-fourths of Americans wanted more restrictions on immigration. Yet all three presidential candidates voted amnesty for the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens.

Hopefully, the peoples of Asia, Africa and the Middle East, who are about to inherit the earth as we pass away, will treat us better than our ancestors treated them in the five centuries that Western Man ruled the world.

Otherwise, we all go out with a bang.

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from Amazon.com. His new book is Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America Apart.


http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/080501_population.htm
 
Two excellent articles Montrose, thanks. I actually used the Buchanan article in a talk I gave to a Nationalist meeting last night after I saw it quoted on another board. There were some disturbed looking faces, and so they should be. We are facing the abyss unless people start to wake up.

The end of the world really is nigh...........
 
"Treat us better than our ancestors treated them"?

Buchanan must have recently become infected with the leftist (I call Dodo virus. Very catching).

We (those left, that is) should HOPE that we are treated as well as our ancestors treated them (but this will not happen. We will more likely be consumed- following jolly nights of burning overturned autos, howling and looting).
 
British National Party

Who Are the Minorities?

August 14, 2009

by BNP News

Over and over again, British people — and Europeans generally — are told that they must “accommodate the minoritiesâ┚¬ in their countries. Yet the worldwide reality is that European-origin people are the true global minority, and, using the liberal logic which demands special rights for minorities, it is Europeans who should receive the special perks.

Consider the following: The world’s population is forecast to hit 7 billion in 2011, the vast majority of its growth coming in ”�’developing’ and, in many cases, the poorest nations, according to the latest World Population Data Sheet issued by the Population Reference Bureau in America.

Some 97 percent of global growth over the next 40 years will happen in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Ca
ribbean, said the report.

“The great bulk of today’s 1.2 billion youth — nearly 90 percent — are in developing countries,â┚¬ said Carl Haub, a co-author of the report. Eight in 10 of those youth live in Africa and Asia.

“During the next few decades, these young people will most likely continue the current trend of moving from rural areas to cities in search of education and training opportunities, gainful employment, and adequate health care,â┚¬ Haub continued, calling it one of the major social questions of the next few decades.

In the developed world, the United States and Canada will account for most of the growth — half from immigration and half from a natural increase in the population — births minus deaths, according to the report.

High fertility rates and a young population base in the ”�’developing’ world will fuel most of the growth, especially in Africa, where women often give birth to six or seven children over a lifetime, the report says. The number is a
bout two in the United States and 1.5 in Canada.

A stark contrast can be drawn between Uganda and Canada, which currently have about 34 million and 31 million residents, respectively. By 2050, Canada’s population is projected to be 42 million, while Uganda’s is expected to soar to 96 million, more than tripling.

“Even with declining fertility rates in many countries, world population is still growing at a rapid rate,â┚¬ said Bill Butz, president of the bureau. “The increase from 6 billion to 7 billion is likely to take 12 years, as did the increase from 5 billion to 6 billion. Both events are unprecedented in world history.â┚¬

By 2050, India is projected to be the world’s most populous nation at 1.7 billion, overtaking current leader China, which is forecast to hit 1.4 billion. The United States is expected to reach 439 million for No. 3 on the list — but the vast majority of that growth will be from immigration from Mexico and South America.

From 1900 to 2100 — a per
iod of 210 years, the proportion of whites on earth will have dropped from 30 percent to three percent. More arresting is that the white population is shrinking not only in relative but in absolute terms. Two hundred million white people, one in every six on earth — a number equal to the entire population of France, Britain, Holland and Germany — will vanish by 2060.

Arabic peoples, 94 million at the birth of Israel in 1948, outnumbered seven to one by Europeans, will rise to 743 million in 2060, a tenfold increase, and will be 75 percent of the ”�’white’ population.

A United Nations population survey in 2007 predicted the 21st century disappearance of western man.

By 2050, a fourth of all the people of Eastern Europe will have vanished. Ukraine will lose one-third of its population. Russia, 150 million at the breakup of the Soviet Union, 142 million today, will be down to 108 million.

By 2050, Iran’s population will have risen from today’s 71 million to 100 million. Paki
stan will add 84 million to reach almost 300 million. Afghanistan’s population will triple from 27 million to 79 million. Iraq’s will go from 29 million to 62 million.

The UN statistics, however, show the populations of Northern, Western and Southern Europe stabilising or falling only slightly.

According to the Pew Research Center, the Hispanic population of the United States of America will triple to 127 million by 2050, as Mexico’s population grows to 130 million.

It is time, therefore, that liberals stopped talking about ”�’minorities’ as if European people were somehow the dominating majority. European-origin people across the world are the true minority, and as such deserve extra special treatment in their home nations.

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September 2007, states very clearly that:

“Article 3

Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virt
ue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Article 4

Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.

Article 6

Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.

Article 8

1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.

2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:

(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;

(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;

(c) Any form of forced popu
lation transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;

(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;

(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.

Article 33

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions. This does not impair the right of indigenous individuals to obtain citizenship of the States in which they live.

2. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures.â┚¬

Skara Brae,

madkins
 
When we're gone as a group there will be no more bling for the free ranging Congoid.

http://autos.sympatico.ca/geneva-autoshow-2010/3114/porsche-918-spyder-hybrid


Madkins your post is on the point with facts.

Though I would guess the the NKVD types reading here care little for rights or legal facts, because if they were a good natured honest folk they would not have engineered this mess along with the open border's of all Western Nation's and teach hatred of us in their media for decades now.

IMO the airport routine is and was to condition folks to accept the police state, but notice million's have choosen not to use any airline, and many business's use charter services because of it.
 
"Treat us better than our ancestors treated them"?

Buchanan must have recently become infected with the leftist (I call Dodo virus. Very catching).

We (those left, that is) should HOPE that we are treated as well as our ancestors treated them (but this will not happen. We will more likely be consumed- following jolly nights of burning overturned autos, howling and looting).

He always does that, to keep his ability to appear on TV and etc. As with his bid for office in 2000 he suckered many of US in 1999-2000 to give him money and then with out consultation picks Foster.

Is he of any real help ?
 
As has been observed, without the complicity of the so-called "conservatives," our demise could not have been so effectively accomplished.

v
 
How the Jews are Exterminating the White Race

by Max Hadden

In the past, I've explained why the Jews are the enemy, some of the tools they are using to destroy us, the names of many responsible, and their primary mental weapon: demoralization (see "These Are Not The Jews You're Looking For"). The Jews and their brainwashed followers in the mass media of news and entertainment and in our educational institutions criticize White people relentlessly demoralizing generations of White children and making them harmless servants and obedient victims. The false ideology of Marxism is pervasive and damaging, but the problem is far worse than "conservatives" admit when they claim the problem is "liberalism". When a race cannot reproduce themselves they are dying and will become extinct. The following thoughts might sound repetitive, but it is imperative that we understand how the Jews are exterminating the White race.

Leadership and the Dreaded N word: "Nazi"

Someone once asked Kevin MacDonald how we were going to win against the Jews when White men have become such cowards who are not fighting back. MacDonald's reply was not to explain the root cause of this and how we could reverse our fate, but instead replied that White men need to find the courage to fight. This does not answer the question nor does it propose a solution. It's like saying to fix the roof of your house you need to be on the roof, when the person was actually asking you where they can find a ladder. MacDonald correctly blames Jews for our plight, but never suggests a process, method or plan to overcome them. White men fighting back against the Jews and other non-White enemies is our goal, but describing a goal is not proposing the means to achieve it. The question remains: is there anything that will make the White man fight for his race?

As someone who has read MacDonald's work and who appreciates his naming the Jew publicly, his work itself is not very original. That there is a genetic reason for Jewish behavior has been known and explained by others in the past, particularly Hitler. MacDonald went on a rant recently on "The Political Cesspool" program (7/17/2010 part c) about how the stupidly named "American Third Position" party were — oh my god! — labeled as "Nazis" by the media. He said he could understand the ADL and other Jewish groups labeling them as Nazis, but the mass media? Shock! Gasp! MacDonald further states that their political party wants to distance themselves from the media stereotype of the goose-stepping skinheads with swastikas because their members are not like that; no, they are educated, articulate and intelligent. Big yawn. Maybe they plan to defeat the Jews by footnoting them to death.

First off, that MacDonald cares what the media says is comical. What's worse is that he wants to do their bidding — running away from National Socialism: the only thing that has ever defeated the Jews and their machinations, period. Second, the reason the American Third Position cannot win is because they don't have mass media and probably can't even afford to buy radio spots, like Dr Pierce did. Winning or losing elections has nothing to do with showing or not showing the swastika, embracing or not embracing the US Constitution, or reading or not reading the book "Racism, Schmacism". We will begin winning when we can directly communicate to our people using mass media and NO ONE HAS EVER DONE THAT the way the Jews have in the television era. Finally, if I were MacDonald, I would never dismiss skinheads. We need ALL of our people that have the balls to join us. If the American Third Position ever fields candidates that give public speeches, the need for skinhead, Brownshirt-style protection against the violent, jew-created rabble of Anarchists, Communists and Marxists will be obvious.

The White movement has no real leadership since Dr William Pierce died. None of the current players understand the way to win power. None are good organizers. None of them are worthy of us calling them our leaders. James Edwards book "Racism, Schmacism" contains the message that Whites should never fear being called "racists" because it neutralizes them, which is correct; however, the masses of people do not read books, and in fact Edwards and his friends continuously use a refrain: we are not Nazis. Let's not be hypocrites, this is the same thing as running away from being called a "racist". Anyone who engages in pro-White activity, even if it's only written words or speech and not canonized law, will be considered a "Nazi". This label should not be feared, but embraced, just like the word "racism". A book is useless even as a means of generating revenue. The strength of TPC is its radio outreach because mass media alone is the ladder to success.

Biology, Non-Existent Harmony, and Brainwashing

Jewish Bolsheviks implanted in the minds of their subjugated peoples the fantasy of a "non-existent harmony". Harmony can never truly exist for different species occupying the same land. Yet Whites have been fooled into believing the Big Lie that Europeans can live in equality and harmony with Africans. In the film JURASSIC PARK the billionaire character falsely believed that he could produce such harmony after creating diverse biological species on his island. After things had gotten out of control and people were dying, he is confronted by the female paleobotanist who tells him that he was wrong to believe he could control this unnatural mixing of animals that did not belong together. Indeed he was wrong, just as the Jews and their beloved Internationale song want to "Unite the human race" globally as if the "human race" even existed when the fact is we are different races. In the film, it only cost the billionaire his time and money. In real life, it is costing us our race.

"Educating" violent and stupid Blacks will never work. Education can only provide knowledge. IQ is a measure of intelligence. IQ cannot be increased by education and any IQ tests that claim otherwise are invalid. If a man was somehow able to contain all the knowledge in the universe in his brain, but his IQ was only 50, he'd still be a retard. He'd have all the knowledge and education possible, but he wouldn't have the intelligence use it. What about environment? Environment can only affect a person's IQ by bringing inherent IQ to full potential. Biologically an individual with no brain damage might have an IQ of 100, but because of poor nutrition (meaning food and drink or harmful substances) or poor health (meaning lack of exercise preventing proper blood flow or low-oxygen hemoglobin) that person operates at a lower IQ; however, it's usually only a few points of IQ and intelligence can be restored to full potential. "Closing" the average double-digit IQ "gap" that exists between Blacks and Whites by correcting environmental factors then is inherently, biologically impossible.

Does the White race have any general biological flaw? Certainly nothing any worse than other races, but one important aspect is that no matter what race one is — except possibly Jewish — instincts can be overcome. Ordinarily when people are trained to override instinct it's a good thing. Flight attendants are trained so they won't panic during an emergency as are military, physicians, and police. Under high stress conditions people revert to either their natural instincts or pre-conditioned training. The most successful mental training to overcome natural healthy instincts in history has been the Jew-created brainwashing of White people to the point that we are committing racial suicide. Jews have made all Western nations safe for themselves by brainwashing Whites to react negatively to "anti-Semitism" and to oppose any sign of White self-preservation as "racism". This programming not only stirs up the Pavlovian hatred "Death to the Nazis!" for those of us struggling to preserve the White race, but also our acceptance of non-Whites living among us with neither concern nor opposition.

The on-going Jewish-created fantasy world of "racial harmony" in every formerly White country is destroying our race. Whites believe in a harmony that does not exist, like the billionaire of JURASSIC PARK. Blacks can never be made our equals by educating them. They are stupid and violent and for us to continue to allow them to rob, rape and kill our people because the Jews have conditioned us that it's "hate" to oppose it, is not only insane, it's suicidal. When we see the unnatural situation of Black sons with our White daughters, if we were healthy and normal, we would react negatively. In fact, it's no longer just Africans or Mestizo boys with our daughters, it is increasingly Asians. The first generations of "immigrant labor" in the forms of east Indians and various Asians like Koreans and Vietnamese now have boys graduating high school and joining the traditional non-Whites vying for our White women. Mass media to deprogram White acceptance of this situation is sorely needed if we are to survive.

Death by "Entertainment"

Comedian Doug Stanhope can be pretty funny when he's not speaking about vital issues that concern our race's survival. He once said the best decisions he and his wife ever made were his vasectomy and her abortion. That's suicidal. Stanhope claims to think deeply and says that most Americans don't. True. The average American doesn't think past his income and his ball games, but it's not due to Stanhope's "deep thinking" that he believes what he does, it's due to Jewish brainwashing. Jewish brainwashing tells us: this world sucks thanks to evil, racist White men, so don't marry and have a family if you're White because you're just perpetuating world misery. It tells our women: a family just ties you down and makes your body unattractive while what you really want is total freedom, so that you can get tattoos and have sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere, and the best way to get all this glorious freedom and independence is to stay single and get a college education and a "career".

The latest film by writer-director Jim Cameron is called AVATAR. Cameron might be a Canadian by birth, but given his latest film, not to mention the "Black genius" character in T2, one seriously has to wonder whether his mother's a Jew. AVATAR has all the themes Jews and Marxists love. The film depicts the White man who is once again murdering and killing the poor innocent "other" because, well, just because Whites are innately evil. This time "the other" is in the form of aliens who are obvious surrogates for American Indians with a tinge of Iraqis mixed in, but instead of oil they have a precious mineral. The main message in this film is demonstrated by the lead character and can be stated as: the only way a White man can redeem himself for the sins of his race and overcome his personal wickedness — a kind of "racist" original sin — is to fight against his own kind.

Another recent film that was both despicable and telling was made by the mentally ill writer-director known as Quentin Tarantino. Tarantino really believes he's "cool." While in reality, he's a sick bastard. Tarantino inserts violent and gory scenes into his films for the shock value and because he enjoys them. A better suspect for a snuff film homicide would be hard to find. Tarantino's latest piece of filth is a 1978 remake misspelled as INGLORIOUS BASTERDS. Any film that glorifies murdering the honorable Germans who served on the good side in the Second World War is something that I will never view. This film is telling because it shows us what Jewish Hollywood likes, and what they're brainwashing the public to like too: murdering "Nazis" is a good thing. The moral of the film is: hate Nazis and delight when they're murdered because that's what "cool" people do.

The Jewish leaders of Communism developed tactics to "neutralize" the enemy using name calling: "racist", "Nazi", "hater", "fascist" as explained in a YouTube clip I once posted. Given a recent article, Kevin MacDonald has finally realized what Alex Linder and I have pointed out for years: the similarities between the USSR and AmeriKwa are many and they are the direct result of Jewish power. The Jews and their twisted followers are literally brainwashing us into accepting our own self-destruction as the three examples of "entertainment" reveal. The "career chick" theme promoted by Jewish "Feminism" only leads to one thing: destruction of the family and eventually the White race. Cameron might believe he was "moralizing" and that his film can only lead to good. Wrong. He is demoralizing every White male who sees his film. This is what the Jews like. What Jews love is brainwashing Whites to hate us Nazis to such a high degree that they want to kill us, for our love.

The Race War and Safety Valve Media

During war it's usually easy to identify the enemy. We are in a war now — a race war — yet our people cannot see the enemy. As Paul Fromm once said, if these Third World losers arrived wearing uniforms we'd defend ourselves, but because they aren't and come invited by "our" government, their invasion is unchallenged. The only ones who recognize our enemies are us Nazis. The enemy is not, as Alex Jones rails about, some anonymous group of "psychopaths who are eugenicists" and in his irrational mind "Nazis". The enemy = Jews and the non-White hordes who live among us. The reason Jones can't see the enemy is because he's brainwashed believing: the Holocaust = real, anti-Semitism = evil, racism = evil, Nazis = evil and multiracial societies are a wonderful thing. This programming keeps Jones from fighting the true enemy and cause of world unrest: Jews.

Race problems in the US are not the result of "liberalism" and if only it could replaced by "conservatism" everything would be fine as the lying entertainers Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have been telling us for years. Notice that no matter how long they whine, things just keep getting worse. Marxism is the product of the people who call themselves Jews. Every ideology starts with an individual and every individual is a member of a race. The false ideology of Marxism — especially that all races are equal — came implicitly from the Jew Karl Marx. The reason so many Whites have adopted it is because of Jewish power. The Jews are in control. Ideas can never create a biological species they can only nurture or destroy it. The Talmud did not create the Jews, the Jews created the Talmud. The reason we are being exterminated is because the Jews want us to be.

Limbaugh and Hannity are allowed to persist because they are the "safety valves" of the "conservative" movement. They give the numerous people who listen to them as well as the lying loudmouth Jew Michael "Savage" Weiner a chance to release their frustration. This is the same reason Alex Jones can have some limited success and is allowed to continue with his misdirection. Internally, the mental stresses and pressures of White men and even some women who are able to think critically becomes so great that they have to vent; hence, the need for safety valves in the mass media providing the illusion to the callers that they really have done something productive. Some Jews make money off them as well, but the main reason that they are allowed to exist is they are HARMLESS. If they were not harmless, they would be called... haters, racists, anti-Semites, Nazis.

In normal wars the new private jumps and runs when the earth explodes nearby and is terrified, but after some time in the field, the explosions no longer have the same affect and he barely flinches. Bombs in the race war are exploding all around us yet the average White man barely flinches. VNN's own brilliant contributor Arch Stanton recently wrote "An Epiphany" containing an example of an event that I witness myself nearly every week: a White female with a Black male. Arch Stanton and I recognize these events as explosions in the race war, but the Marxist safety valve media never mentions them, which is why they are harmless. Pointing out the race war and advocating mental flinching at race-mixing is not what they want to do. As long as we don't have our own media to counter the Jewish Big Lie that "all races are equal", the White casualties of this war will continue to mount.

Pro-White Media Today and the Third Reich

The fledgling pro-White media that exists continues to be a valiant if limited effort. The best of post-Pierce radio programs were Goyfire and Aryan Matters for both content and style, while the original VNN main page with Linder's spintros and a plethora of different writers had the best written material by far. The badly named Voice of (t)Reason folks keeps plugging at it, although most VOR programs lack either originality or vitality or both. In particular I heard a moronic "scholar" on VOR once claim that National Socialism party planks were written for that time therefore we should ignore the entire period. At least they have the intrepid Holohoax exposer in Carolyn Yeager who garners both my respect and attention. Another person who has recently made a good deal of waves is Jim Giles, and his content varies from excellent "truth of the matter" commentary, interviews, and cold calls, to abysmal dead air, tirades and bad music, but his heart appears to be in the right place.

One thing Giles likes to do is to make things as simple as possible for listeners, very much in the spirit of National Socialist propaganda. His warning that Africans roaming free-range among us will "rob, rape and kill you," is certainly true, but they will also screw your daughter and produce non-White children, who are increasingly bastards raised by grandparents. Yet our brainwashed White people think that's just fine. The military defenses of any nation are usually at the borders to keep the enemy out, but these defenses are useless against an enemy that is already inside. Blacks constitute such an enemy who destroy White wombs. The heart of our racial survival depends on making White babies. Giles calls them "Gerber babies". There was a time when Gerber ads for baby food were filled with blue-eyed, curly-haired, blonde babies, but that's not the case anymore. Nonetheless, reality is that simple: our race is not producing enough White babies and is therefore doomed to extinction.

During the Third Reich, families were given incentives to have more children. Some of the policies of the Third Reich were even carried on after the war was because they were so revolutionary, sound and effective; however, their effectiveness was reduced. Many readers are probably already familiar with the Cross of Honor of the German Mother also known as the Mother's Cross, awarded to mothers who had four or more children. In addition to a medal, even more practical policies were established such as that for every third child born the President of Germany was their Godfather. This encouraged many to not worry about the financial burden of having more children because the State... the Nazi State... would assist them if needed. This policy was also kept afterward, but it was changed to the tenth child rather than the third, which essentially makes it useless.

Even though the fledgling pro-White media is not in an admirable state today, there is a spark of hope. The entire National Socialist movement was successful and we can learn a great deal from those German men who were, and probably still are, the best men of our race. The Third Reich was defeated militarily and not ideologically, philosophically or economically. Anyone not learning as much as possible about the true history of that era will risk reinventing the wheel, or actually the entire car. One could write many books about the brilliant policies of the Third Reich to increase White birth rate and prosperity as well as truthful propaganda and how these could apply today, or tomorrow. I would never request a southerner to stop discussing the War of Northern Aggression, so don't tell me the Third Reich was a different era (duh) or irrelevant when I had two uncles in the HitlerJugend. The brave heroes who died fighting against Jewish Bolshevism deserve our respect, not our censure.

Conclusion

No one can answer the question, "When will the White man fight for his race?" without understanding the root cause: demoralization. Whites have been demoralized by Jewish psychological warfare to not fight for their race. Jewish mass media manipulators and their gentile dupes push guilt-laden "entertainment" into our minds daily and incessantly because they know how are minds work: guilt trips paralyze us. Our natural and healthy instincts have been overcome to make us accept the non-Whites among us. Whites will fight, it's true, please don't misunderstand me. They will travel halfway across the globe to Afghanistan... to fight for Jews. They fight for the Jews indirectly through our Jewish-controlled politicians and directly when they are told that "Nazis" are the threat. Nazism is not the threat, it's the solution and if we had real leaders we'd all be proud Nazis, but instead we have Whites who will fight against their own race, just like the good little "avatars" they are programmed to be.

Jews and Blacks, like all races, behave the way they do for genetic reasons, not ideological ones. The Jews are driving us to racial extinction as a result of their genes. It is what they are. And they are not like us. A perfect example are the past horrors of Communism. Jewish Communism killed more innocent people in the shortest time than anything ever in the history of the world. Sixty five million in the Soviet Union alone. Yet virtually no Jews have a guilty conscience about it. As Commander Rockwell said, where are the films with the sad violin music for dead gentiles? While Whites, on the other hand, are made to feel guilty about the "Holocaust", African slavery, and American Indian massacres, thanks to mass media abusing our moral conscience and instilling these lie-filled guilt trips. Jared Taylor claims we can't blame Jews for everything because Whites have a flaw: we can be easily persuaded. True. But who is doing the persuading? Jews, sir. Jews.

The millions of White men and women who fought for Hitler were not fighting simply for an ideology, they were fighting for our people, they were fighting for survival of White European. National Socialism is a way of life that counters Jewish deceit and makes them harmless, rather than allowing them to rule. Should White Americans adopt National Socialism as a mere copy of the German model? I'm not suggesting that exactly. Only the Germans can be as cool as they once were. My God, even their surnames like "Kesselring" are cool! The rest of the pro-White world should create their versions of NS when and if we ever regain our will to survive. Can a political party such as A3P get members elected who can change the laws permanently in a pro-White fashion without first building mass media and enough supporters? Impossible. Like Paul Craig Roberts, they are afraid of Brownshirts. Guys, we are in this together and our concern should be brown skins, not Brownshirts.

Every Fourth of July weekend, we're supposed to fly the flag and thank our veterans, especially the "Greatest Generation" who fought the "war against racism". Give me a break. The greatest war criminal in history, Winston Churchill, made a speech on June 4, 1940 in he which he stated, "We shall never surrender." Although England did not surrender, they still lost the war. That island today is becoming a Third World cesspool and White English are dying out. Anything that reduces the production of White babies needs to be destroyed. The way to stop the Jews from brainwashing us into committing racial suicide is by exposing their agenda via our own mass media. Don't believe it? I was a brainwashed Marxist thirteen years ago until Dr Pierce woke me up. Since then, I have analyzed everything I see and hear critically to the point that I understand the world much better today. What is most clear to me now is how the Jews are exterminating the White race.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaPA8fGeRUc&playnext=1&videos=b29qzKiTPkU Music to read this by.
 
I don't think there's going to be food to feed the burgeoning African population. The White man's magic is hitting resource limits, and thank heavens it is! See

http://www.warsocialism.com/

Also, see Michael Lind's article, "Aer the American People Obsolete?"

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/27/american_people_obsolete

Have the American people outlived their usefulness to the rich minority in the United States? A number of trends suggest that the answer may be yes.

In every industrial democracy since the end of World War II, there has been a social contract between the few and the many. In return for receiving a disproportionate amount of the gains from economic growth in a capitalist economy, the rich paid a disproportionate percentage of the taxes needed for public goods and a safety net for the majority.

In North America and Europe, the economic elite agreed to this bargain because they needed ordinary people as consumers and soldiers. Without mass consumption, the factories in which the rich invested would grind to a halt. Without universal conscription in the world wars, and selective conscription during the Cold War, the U.S. and its allies might have failed to defeat totalitarian empires that would have created a world order hostile to a market economy.

Globalization has eliminated the first reason for the rich to continue supporting this bargain at the nation-state level, while the privatization of the military threatens the other rationale.

The offshoring of industrial production means that many American investors and corporate managers no longer need an American workforce in order to prosper. They can enjoy their stream of profits from factories in China while shutting down factories in the U.S. And if Chinese workers have the impertinence to demand higher wages, American corporations can find low-wage labor in other countries.

My point is that, in all the White world, the US has been held up as the "great multiracial experiment," with an African president no less!

Now the same elites are literally scuttling the country, the way a sailor would scuttle a ship (sink it on purpose). Also, it's the Jew ruled country. The whole world knows that. And it's getting destroyed.

Wouldn't you think that they'd want their shining example of a Jew-run, multicultural paradise to thrive and last 1,000 years (LOL)?

Correlation isn't necessarily causation, but isn't it funny how you can plot a direct path between the rise of Jews and the rise of the Multicult, and the decline of the USA to it's destruction? Who will be able to deny it?

All that's left is for the US .gov to go broke. All .gov is, is a racket of salaries, pensions, contracts, grants and subsidies. That's all it is.

Multiculturalism is expensive, and it's bought and paid for every day -- until they can't buy it any more. Then it's over. We'll return to traditional, folkish ways, and one of those traditional folkish ways is racialism. And there won't be anyone to prevent this or micromanage our lives.

One big X factor will be all the people who are dependent on government jobs, including university people. There will be MASSIVE economic displacement. It's going to be brutal. But the good thing is, our narrative, our explanation, will be the obviously true one, and the one that is excepted by people who are no longer PAID to believe otherwise.
 
“Do As I Say”: The Paradox Of Eugenics And The Jews
By Cooper Sterling

John Glad, now 69, is a retired scholar of Russian studies and expert on Russian exile literature. He had a distinguished career as a former director of the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies in the Woodrow Wilson International Center for scholars, Guggenheim Fellow, and professor of Russian Studies at the University of Maryland. Glad was the chief translator of The Black Book: The Ruthless Murder of Jews by German-Fascist Invaders Throughout the Temporarily Occupied Regions of the Soviet Union and in the Death Camps of Poland during the War 1941-1945 (Holocaust Library) and thus occupies a unique position as a Russian scholar who documented the mass murder of Jews in Eastern Europe during World War II.

In 2006, Glad published Future Human Evolution: Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century Future Human Evolution, a concise reappraisal of the scientific basis of eugenics. Smith College’s Seymour Itzkoff noted in the preface that Glad had “clearly and authoritatively” reaffirmed the “humanistic tradition” of eugenics. Itzkoff credited Glad with debunking the widely-believed idea that the Holocaust was the culmination of eugenic policies implemented by goose-stepping mad scientists under the auspices of the Third Reich. (Future Human Evolution can be downloaded free of charge—in any of 13 languages!— here.)

Now, after five years of additional research, Glad has expanded one of the chapters of Future Human Evolution into a new book: Jewish Eugenics. It’s likely to stir a hornet’s nest for candidly assessing two interconnected, career-ending, politically incorrect subjects: Jews and eugenics.

Glad’s controversial thesis: since the 1960s, a prominent group of Jewish public intellectuals has been systematically and unscrupulously campaigning to discredit eugenics—but, by a great paradox, other Jewish intellectuals, and Zionists, have been actively interested in eugenic principles, both historically and currently, to secure the posterity—health and wellbeing—of Jews.

Indeed, Glad’s research suggests that Judaism itself has eugenic implications. He considers Jewry as applied Darwinian theory: the practice of group-based natural selection for successful human traits, such as mental and physical attributes of intelligence (high IQ) and health (reproductive fitness, elimination of genetic diseases, etc.). In Glad’s own words:

“The essence of Jewry lies not in any purported genetic preservationism, but rather in its eugenic dynamism. By maintaining high barriers to genetic interlopers, but not excluding them entirely, a constant influx of high-quality genes was achieved, producing superior intelligence. The Jewish-British geneticist and eugenicist Redcliffe Salaman formulated the most accurate definition: an endogamous family.”

Early in the book, Glad reflects on the intellectual voyage that led him, as a humanitarian, to the topic that would dominate his retirement years, and more precisely to seek the answer to why “ideology was dictating the resolution of scientific questions…. So I resolved to learn about eugenics on my own—the best way to learn anything, really….”

Glad explains:

“Recognizing in Washington, D.C. (where else?!) the crucial role played by Jews in intellectual life and politics, and by some Jews in the suppression of the eugenics movement, I resolved to go back to basics and create a chronology of the shifting Jewish viewpoints that have led us to where we find ourselves today. And, as the reader will see, the deeper I dug, the more I found. It is now indisputable that much of what might be termed ‘accepted eugenics narrative’ is in crass discordance with the historical facts.”

In painstaking detail, Glad explains how eugenics was a robust scientific movement in the early 1900s, an “interdisciplinary conceptualization of the genetic consequences of social practices…” which strived to “replace natural selection with scientific selection”. Glad is well aware that at one time the ranks of the eugenics movement in the United States and Europe included university presidents, such as Stanford President David Starr Jordan and Harvard University President A. Lawrence Lowell, Anglican Priest William Inge (Dean of St. Paul’s Cathedral), Population Geneticists Ronald A. Fisher and J.B.S. Haldane, inventor Alexander Graham Bell, economist John Maynard Keynes, Leonard Darwin, H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Arthur Balfour, Vernon Kellogg (of the prominent cereal family), the Carnegie Institute, Havelock Ellis, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, Nobel laureates Herman Muller and William Shockley, award-winning physiologist Dwight J. Ingle (founding editor of Perspectives in Biology and Medicine), Yale University Geographer Ellsworth Huntington, and scores of scientists from the social, biological, and medical professions.

Glad even reminds readers that Winston Churchill, the much-lionized British Prime Minister during World War II, was an avid eugenicist—an irony, given that Marxist-leaning Jewish critics have used guilt-by-association tactics to smear the eugenics movement as crypto-Nazi.

Glad’s research has led him to conclude that the Nazi atrocities were not eugenics-inspired. The mass murder of Jews was an act of revenge and “the result was decidedly dysgenic”. Nor was this alleged connection recognized at the time. Glad writes:

“During the first 47 years following the end of World War II—nearly a half century—only one book associating ‘eugenics’ with ‘Holocaust’ is shown by a ‘Worldcat’ search.”

But eventually a publishing cottage industry developed, from Robert Jay Lifton’s The Nazi Doctors to Arthur Caplan’s edited volume When Medicine Went Mad to Edwin Black’s War Against the Weak, aiming to discredit eugenics by linking it to the Holocaust. A vocal contingent of Jewish scholars spearheaded the anti-eugenics jihad, including Daniel Kevles, Richard Lewontin, Leon Kamin, Steven Rose, Stephen Jay Gould, Ashley Montagu, Sander Gilman, and Edwin Black. Glad argues that they have succeeding in perpetrating anti-eugenic fallacies as an intellectual orthodoxy in academia—a orthodoxy that relies on argumentum ad vercundiam (argument from authority).

The rise of this anti-eugenic Jewish clique in the biological and social sciences can be viewed as a reaction to what Steven Rose, the biologist and radical critic of evolutionary psychology, considers as the “arch-Darwinian” influence of sociobiologists and behavioral geneticists. (See Richard Dawkins interview with Rose on YouTube.). As Glad notes, much of the reaction is a collaborative response to the publication of Edward O. Wilson’s Sociobiology, Arthur R. Jensen’s landmark research in racial differences in IQ, Richard Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene, Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s The Bell Curve. The drive to claim minor inconsistencies in Cyril Burt’s twin studies data as fraudulent is part of this larger effort to discredit any research that underscores the important contribution of genetics to human behavior, which Glad summarizes.

Paradoxically, however, over the years Jewish scholars have played and are still playing an active role as pioneers in eugenic research. As Glad notes, contributors to the Eugenics Quarterly “or whose work is reviewed or advertised there” include: William E. Fineberg, Joseph Felsenstein, Bertram Fleshler, H. Green, Bernard Greenburg, Arnold R. Kaplan, R. C. Lewontin, Samuel Levin, N. Mantel, Ashley Montagu, Edward Pohlman, Reich Rosenthal, J. Samuelson, and Melvin Zelnick. Geneticist Irving Isadore Gottesman served as an officer of the American Eugenics Society in the late 1960s.

This paradox constitutes the core of Jewish Eugenics Glad’s narrative contrasts Jewish intellectual hostility to eugenics, reflected in contemporary authors on the Holocaust, with the pioneering work of leading Jewish researchers seeking to eliminate genetic diseases, increase fertility rates, and enhance IQ levels in the Jewish gene pool.

One important focus of Jewish eugenic research has been Jewish fertility rates, including concerns over the level of outbreeding (intermarriage rates between Jews and non-Jews). The author summarizes a multitude of sources, including various studies and quotes of prominent Jews, which over the years reveal the intense interest in Jewish fertility, genetic screening, and the elimination of Jewish genetic diseases such as Tay-Sachs, Bloom’s Syndrome, Mucolipidosis type IV (ML IV), and a host of other hereditary conditions. (Various websites bolster Glad’s arguments, such as the Jewish Genetic Disease Consortium, and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine’s “Jewish Genetics Disease Center.”)

None other than American Zionist activist Alan Dershowitz summarized the quintessential concern in his book The Vanishing American Jew:

“Despite, perhaps because of, the growing threats of assimilation, intermarriage, and low birthrates, many Jews are writing about the Jewish future. Many more are thinking and speaking about it. The time is ripe for bringing our disparate ideas together in a collective enterprise devoted to devising a plan—or plans—of action to preserve the Jewish future…. There is no reason why one of the oldest continuing human civilizations cannot turn to the newest of technologies to enhance its prospects for the future. For the first time in our long history, our survival is in our own hands, and not in those of our enemies.”

Glad documents in unprecedented detail the dual roles that Jews have played over the past four decades in distorting the legacy of the eugenics movement while aggressively advancing a eugenic agenda to fortify Jewish culture and Zionism. Glad shows how Jews maintained an active role in the eugenics movement, most notably during its formative years as a “progressive” intellectual society, and how eventually Jewish Marxists played a crucial role in evasively discrediting the legitimacy of eugenics.

Glad’s account offers a compelling narrative, threaded with a multitude of examples, of Zionists and Rabbinical clerics warning in the early twentieth century of the dangers of “intermarriage” with non-Jews.

Examples Glad puts forth include: the founding of The Journal of Jewish Demography and Statistics (Zeitschrift für Deomgraphie und Statistik der Juden) in 1904, which among other research areas, examined “Jewish biology”; statements attributed to leading Zionists, such as Ze’ev Jabotinsky, over concern of “complete assimilation” of Jews into non-Jewish societies and that the “source of national feeling…lies in a man’s blood…in his racio-physical type”; prominent Zionist physician Aaron Sandler warning in Anthropology and Zionism that inbreeding and “separating out” alien blood have helped Jewry remain racially pure (rassenrein); and a host of observations over the years by prominent Jewish eugenicists and physicians on the necessity of preserving Jewish heritage.

Glad notes that

“For all its excesses, eugenics has been an astounding, indeed and existential success for Jews, molding them into a uniquely resourceful and intelligent people, and the current assault on eugenics by an understandably emotion-driven minority Jewish faction represents a frontal assault on the very essence of Jewry.”

The author explains his interest in a subject that would end the career of any aspiring young academic, which he elaborated in a Q & A interview in The Occidental Quarterly. As a “human rights” activist, Glad’s interest in eugenics is simply a matter of extending human rights to posterity.

Glad ultimately frames the essence of the matter:

“How, the reader must invariably ask, has it come about that the fundamental pro-eugenics thrust—not just of Judaism and Zionism, but of Jewry in its essence and totality—has been so assiduously concealed, but that eugenics has been wed in the public consciousness to a tragic infatuation with the topic on the part of a political figure who put a bullet through his brain in a besieged Berlin bunker?

“The Jewish attitude toward eugenics is truly paradoxical. We are dealing here with a disconnect between practice and theory. For lack of a proper understanding of the nature of eugenics as a worldview, the rage has been directed at the word, so that a number of alternative terms have been proposed—‘reproductive genetics’, for example (as if such a beast as ‘non-reproductive genetics’ actually existed). It is like writing an encyclopedia article about horses without using the word ‘horse’.”

Of course, Jewish Eugenics deserved a major trade publisher and mass distribution, like the anti-eugenics cottage industry it so effectively refutes. But, given the current climate, Glad has found only a minor press. This has some unfortunate consequences. The core of the book, after an introductory essay, is an extensive 271-page “Micro-Chronology of Jewish Eugenics” which has a somewhat cumbersome format.

But the material is eye-opening. Glad’s “Micro-chronology” is the print equivalent of time-lapse photography. The reader can track over time simultaneous developments in Jewish advocacy of eugenics, Jewish rejection of eugenics, and the annual context of events.

Glad cites some 400 sources (pro- and anti-eugenic statements), which span over 150 years—from 1844, with the famous claim Benjamin Disraeli’s character, Sidonia, in the novel, Tancred, “All is race; there is no other truth”, to statements on U.S. immigration policy in 2010 from former Director of National Affairs at the American Jewish Committee Stephen Steinlight). Glad’s sources include path-breaking findings from genetic studies of Jewish groups, observations of researchers from Jewish universities, and a multitude of quotations from Israeli politicians, professors at Ben-Gurion University, prominent American Jews, various rabbinical authorities, newspaper editorials, book reviews as well as Jewish and non-Jewish IQ researchers, such as Richard Lynn and evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald.

Glad actually dedicates his book “to the memory of those Jewish and non-Jewish eugenicists who were defamed and persecuted in the Western world….”

Jewish Eugenics is an indispensible manual for anyone interested in deconstructing the simultaneous Jewish impact in advancing and discrediting the eugenics movement.

Cooper Sterling [email him] is a freelance writer in the Washington, DC area.

If you want to email or print out, format by clicking on this permanent URL:
http://www.vdare.com/sterling/110211_do_as_i_say.htm

************
 
Back
Top