Does it occur to u idiots there's CURE to covid?--so why vaxx?--answer: making money & mass-murder

80% of covid deaths in Scotland are occurring among VACCINATED residents​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/09/80-of-covid-deaths-in-scotland-are.html
Public Health Scotland has released new data showing that the vast majority of “covid” deaths in the country are occurring in people who are “fully vaccinated.”
Scots who took both doses of one of Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” injections comprise 75 percent of all covid-related deaths, while those who took just one dose so far make up five percent.
The remaining 20 percent of deaths being blamed on covid are occurring in people who are “unvaccinated,” but who likely “caught” vaccine spike proteins that were shed on them by the “fully vaccinated.”
Mind you, there are no unvaccinated people who are going from healthy to unhealthy to death in a matter of days or even hours. This is, however, happening to people who get the shots.
Some of these “fully vaccinated” people are quite literally dropping dead unexpectedly from the jabs, which authorities and the media have no way to explain.
The healthiest people are those who do not take the jabs and who test “positive” and later recover. These people develop natural immunity to whatever it is that is circulating, while those who get jabbed are more prone to getting sick and dying.
“Don’t you think we should have figured all of this out before we went on a stabby spree with lightly tested technology that you cannot turn around and undo if it goes badly?” asks Karl Denninger.
“We would have found out and halted what may well be an incipient disaster if we didn’t proceed with ‘Warp Speed’ and instead went through the regular process of gathering that long-term data while allowing the use of these jabs only by those at the highest degree of individual ‘bad outcome’ infection risk (such as residents of nursing homes who have, on average, six months of remaining life and thus long-term risks are, for most of them, irrelevant).”

Unvaccinated need to get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated – HUH!?​

To explain away all the injuries and deaths occurring in people who are “fully vaccinated,” the establishment is now claiming that the unvaccinated are spreading illness to the vaccinated.
Because not every person is taking the jabs, those who did take them do not have protection, we are told. My vaccine protects you, and your vaccine protects me, is the latest version of the story.
That anyone believes such nonsense says a lot about the collective stupidity of the masses. Either that or the government and media think we are all so stupid as to believe that a vaccine only works if everyone gets it.
“Never before in history has there been a need to ‘protect the vaccinated,'” Denninger explains. “There isn’t one now unless the jabs not only don’t work, but in some percentage of people who took them they make infection worse – and they know it.”
“The point of a vaccine is to gain personal protection. I have written about this many times; the premise of ‘herd immunity’ is in fact why epidemic spread of any pathogen stops being a material concern but the decision to take a vaccine is a personal one, despite all the screaming over the decades by various idiots.”
Part of the agenda would seem to be to harm men, as males are much more likely than females to experience a serious adverse reaction or death from a Chinese Virus injection.
“The data on the covid jabs say they offer more harm than benefit in young healthy boys,” Denniger writes. “Mandating them is thus not just malpractice and negligence, it’s manslaughter.”
 

Chlorine dioxide approved as COVID-19 treatment in Bolivia​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/09/chlorine-dioxide-approved-as-covid-19.html
Bob Sisson and his guests on CLO2TV talk about chlorine dioxide being used as a treatment for COVID-19 in different countries such as Bolivia and Honduras.
Bolivians are now ingesting chlorine dioxide, known by its advocates as Miracle Mineral Solutions, to treat COVID-19. This chemical was approved by the senate as a treatment for the disease that has affected people from around the globe.
In the Bolivian City of Cochabamba, the provincial government has approved its use, and many believe that the substance can help treat COVID. Pharmacies are selling chlorine dioxide and it is made available for the prevention and healing from COVID-19.
MMS supporters claim that the substance can treat virtually any illness, including COVID-19.
While it is illegal in Bolivia to promote MMS as a medical substance, the country is in a vulnerable position, and the legislature passed a bill that would authorize its use.
MMS is already in production at university laboratories and is ready for distribution to COVID-19 patients. Across the country, there have been numerous injuries and a single death reported among those who used the chemical as a drug.

Chlorine dioxide treatment backed by a group of doctors​

Andreas Kalcker, a German researcher, claimed that chlorine dioxide offers a cheap and accessible solution to COVID-19. He was interviewed on the Bolivian national TV channel, RED Gigavision, about MMS, where he said it was effective against the disease.
Kalcker is backed by a group of doctors from the World Coalition for Health and Life (COMUSAV) led by La Paz pediatrician Dr. Patricia Callisperis. Callisperis advocates for the use of chlorine dioxide to treat COVID-19 because of its “oxygenating action at a mitochondrial level.”
Callisperis said that Comusav was “testing everything” as there was “no scientific evidence for any medicine or substance proposed in the world” that could treat COVID-19.
She also described MMS as a “natural cure” that taps into the roots of Bolivians.
Bolivian media reports also said that Comusave has previously used MMS to treat patients in Oruro, eastern Bolivia, with the backing of local authorities. Callisperis herself confirmed that Bolivian legislators consulted Comusav about MMS.
She also dismissed reports of harm caused by the substance, saying that media reports were insufficiently rigorous — she would stop promoting MMS herself if it were shown to have “conclusive” evidence.
Kalcker also said that Comusav’s support for chlorine dioxide is compelling evidence that supports its effectiveness.

A country in political crisis​

Kate Centellas, a Croft associate professor of anthropology and Latin American studies at the University of Mississippi said that Bolivia is a country in crisis. She shared that the high level of COVID-19 cases in Bolivia induced panic, and advocating for chlorine dioxide is a way to signal disaffection with political and scientific establishments.
The coronavirus also put additional pressure on the government itself.
“Chlorine dioxide, regardless of whether it is effective or not, is a great thing to fit into that narrative because it’s cheap, it makes it look like they’re defending the people, and obviously the executive has to block it because it’s not healthy,” Jhanisse Vaca Daza, a human rights activist. Her group, the Standing Rivers charity, organized efforts to distribute essential medical supplies to Bolivians who don’t have access to medical treatment.
“There is so much desperation. We see it firsthand because we are often delivering protective equipment and food. We’ve seen how desperate people are. So having something that is not only cheap but also accessible seems like the perfect thing you would want to find right now.”
 

Same ivermectin that US government doesn’t want Americans to receive is saving lives across India​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/09/same-ivermectin-that-us-government.html
Uttar Pradesh, one of India’s most densely populated regions, is doing exceptionally well with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “cases.” The reason why? Ivermectin is widely used there.
With a population of 240 million people, which is about 75 percent of the total United States population, Uttar Pradesh has had only about 24 cases of the Chinese Virus and no deaths over the past several months. This is astounding compared to what is happening throughout the West.
Among India’s 36 states, Uttar Pradesh boasts being dead last on the list of infected states. Once again, the reason for this is simple: ivermectin is not a dirty word there like it is in the U.S.
“Evidently, the global medical junta doesn’t like the over 60 studies vouching for the efficacy of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2, especially when used early, but there is something better than a study: pure reality of lived experience,” writes Daniel Horowitz for Blaze Media.
Beginning in late 2020, authorities in Uttar Pradesh began liberally dispensing ivermectin to people, urging them to take it early on at the first signs of a possible infection and even preventatively. This advice turned out to be solid.
“By the end of 2020, Uttar Pradesh – which distributed free ivermectin for home care – had the second-lowest fatality rate in India at 0.26 per 100,000 residents in December. Only the state of Bihar, with 128 million residents, was lower, and it, too, recommends ivermectin,” reported Trial Site News.

Covid is gone from Uttar Pradesh, thanks to ivermectin​

For a “horse de-wormer,” ivermectin sure did help Uttar Pradesh avoid a major crisis. Ever since the drug was introduced there, the Fauci Flu has pretty much been eradicated.
Nobody is dying from Chinese Germs there because they are gaining protection from the use of ivermectin, which has repeatedly been shown as effective against the Wuhan Flu.
“Uttar Pradesh likely would have been the first world experiment of what a given area would have looked like had they been taking ivermectin from day one before a wave hit,” Horowitz explains.
“Unfortunately, hundreds of thousands of seasonal migrants fled Mumbai and other big cities when the Delta wave hit and all settled back in their villages in Uttar Pradesh, giving them the same spike that every other state got because those people were not on ivermectin.”
As of now, there has still not been a proper case study using an actual population like this to demonstrate the power of ivermectin to put an end to the plandemic.
This is unfortunate because we could have been long done with this nonsense ages ago, were it not for the corrupt political influence that is keeping ivermectin out of the hands of the people, particularly in the West.
There would be no need for panic, masks, “vaccines,” or any other mindless hysteria if the “authorities” would just give up their crusade against ivermectin and let people try it. Many deaths and hospitalization could be prevented this way.
Tony Fauci and his cronies continue to try to strongarm India into accepting snake oil “remedies” like remdesivir and Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” injections, but the country, or at least parts of it, have been resisting rather formidably.
“All trials are saying that this drug is not effective in the treatment of COVID-19, rather it is complicating and resulting in mortality of patients,” says Dr. Surya Kant Tripathi about the failure of remdesivir.
“At so many centers, remdesivir trials were stopped. Also, remdesivir is costing minimum of Rs 5,000 per vial.”
 

CEO of Moderna Says Even Young Will Need to Take Vaccine Booster Shots Indefinitely​

by Paul Joseph Watson
September 23rd 2021, 7:22 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/ceo-...d-to-take-vaccine-booster-shots-indefinitely/

Two tier society that punishes the unvaccinated could remain in place forever.

The CEO of pharmaceutical giant Moderna says that even younger people will have to get vaccine booster shots at least once every three years, meaning that a two-tier society which punishes the unvaccinated could remain in place indefinitely.

According to Stephane Bancel, the pandemic will continue for at least another year, at which point there will be enough vaccine doses “so that everyone on this Earth can be vaccinated.”


This includes jabs for infants and booster shots for those who require them.

“Those who don’t get vaccinated will immunize themselves naturally because the Delta variant is so contagious,” said Bancel, although he went on to assert that such people would still get ill.

“You can either get vaccinated and have a good winter. Or you don’t do it and risk getting sick and possibly even ending up in hospital,” said the Moderna CEO.

Bancel says life will return to normal “in a year,” but that this will be dependent on people continuing to receive regular COVID-19 booster jabs.

The CEO said older and vulnerable people would “undoubtedly” need refresher shots at least once a year, while even younger people who face an infinitesimal chance of dying from the virus will need booster shots every three years.

Israel has already signaled that vaccine passports will incorporate mandatory proof of an individual having received booster shots.


This means that those hoping to ride out the pandemic while remaining unvaccinated, with all freedoms returned next year, may actually face a permanent bio-security police state which keeps them under de facto lockdown forever.

Those who for whatever reason refuse to take their booster jabs will also face discrimination when it comes to travel and basic lifestyle activities in many countries.

Despite Bancel’s insistence that the entire planet will have been offered a vaccine within a year, according to Amnesty International, “Moderna has not yet delivered a single vaccine dose to a low-income country.”
 

Investigation: Deaths among Teenage Boys have increased by 63% in the UK since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/investigation-deaths-among-teenage-boys.html
An investigation of official ONS data has revealed that since the Covid-19 vaccine was offered and administered to teenagers in England and Wales there has been a 63% rise in deaths among teenage boys, with one week seeing an increase as high as 700%.
On October 1st, we exclusively revealed that ONS data shows there has been a 47% rise in all-cause deaths among teenagers between the ages of 15-19 since they began getting the Covid-19 vaccine.
Our investigation found that official Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows that between 26th June 2020 – 18th September 2020 there were 148 deaths among teenagers between 15 – 19 years of age.
Whereas ONS data for 2021 shows that between 25th Jun 2021 – 17th September 2021 there were 217 deaths among teenagers between 15 – 19 years of age, meaning deaths among teens over the age of 15 were 47% higher than the same period during 2020.
The difference? The rise in teen deaths in 2021 coincided with them being offered the Covid-19 vaccine, as documented in NHS data which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the NHS website here, shows that as of 27th June 2021 over 147,000 people under the age of 18 had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.
image-246.png
Source
However, further data published by Public Health England on the number of 999 calls made requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest; which has skyrocketed against the expected average since young adults and teens began receiving the Covid-19 vaccine, made us want to revisit the ONS data due to a suspicion we would find that the majority of excess deaths among teens are actually among teenage boys.
image-15.png
Source
The reason for this suspicion was that the Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency have openly admitted that they suspect myocarditis and pericarditis are potential side effects of the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines, especially among young males. A suspicion that has been strong enough for the UK Medicine Regulator to officially add warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis to the safety labels of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, whereas pericarditis is inflammation of the protective sacs surrounding the heart. Both are extremely serious conditions due to the vital role the heart plays in keeping a person alive, and the fact that the heart muscle cannot regenerate. Serious myocarditis can lead to cardiac arrest and knock years off a persons life.
image-28.png

Before diving back into the ONS data we decided to see if we could find official confirmation of when teens as old as 19 started to receive the Covid-19 vaccine, as our previous exclusive investigation only found confirmation of when teen sunder the age of 18 started to receive the Covid-19 jab.
We discovered in a Public Health England document titled ‘Weekly Flu and Covid-19 Report‘ that teens aged 18 and 19 began receiving the Covid-19 vaccines as early as the 2nd week of 2021. From week 2 to week 13 of 2021 there was a steady climb to around 12% of eligible teens aged 18 and 19 receiving at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, before the numbers vaccinated flat lined until around week 18 of 2021 where they started to pick up again.
image-29.png
Source – Page 82 (older age groups removed for clarity)
Upon discovering this we decided to revisit the ONS data and carry out a new review of the numbers contained within the report, and unfortunately our suspicion that excess deaths are disproportionately occurring in teenage boys was confirmed.
The 2020 edition of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that between the week ending 8th May 2020 and the week ending 18th September 2020, a total of 219 deaths occurred among 15 – 19-year-olds. Of these 142 deaths were among teenage boys, whilst 77 deaths were among teenage girls.
image-26.png

Whereas the 2021 editions of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that between the week ending 7th May 2021 and the week ending 17th September 2021, a total of 320 deaths occurred among 15 – 19-year-olds. Of these 231 deaths were among teenage boys, whilst 89 deaths were amongst teenage girls.
image-27.png

This shows that the number of deaths between May 7th 2021 and September 17th 2021 among teens aged 15 and over were 46% higher than the number of deaths in this age group during the same period in 2020, and the increase in deaths began at precisely the same time teens started receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
For instance in the 6 weeks prior to the 8th May 2020 there were 93 deaths among all teens over the age of 15, whereas in the 6 weeks prior to 7th May 2021 there were 100 deaths among all teens over the age 15, representing an increase of just 7.5% in 2021 on the previous year.
But what this also shows is that since the Covid-19 vaccines began being given to teens over the age of 15, deaths among teenage boys have increased by 63%, whereas deaths among teenage girls have still increased, but at a much lower rate of just 16%.
We compiled the following table of ONS figures so that we were able to easily compare the number of deaths per week among teens over the age of 15 separated into males and females.
image-24.png
Source – ONS 2020 + 2021 datasets
As you can see above the highest increase in deaths came in the week ending 25th June 2021 which saw a 700% increase on the number of deaths in teens on the previous year, this represented a 500% increase in male teen deaths, and a 400% increase in female teen deaths.
The largest increase in male teen deaths came in the week ending September 3rd 2021 which saw a 700% increase in male teen deaths, but just a 17% increase in female teen deaths.
We were also able to discover from the table above that deaths in male teens have seen a significant increase in 17 of the 20 weeks since a sizeable amount of teens started getting the Covid-19 vaccine, with the remaining 3 weeks registering a 0% increase, a -45% decrease, and a -22% decrease registered in the week ending 17th September.
Whereas deaths among female teens only saw an increase on the previous year in 8 of the 20 weeks since this age group began receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. Five of the 20 weeks saw a 0% increase in deaths on the previous year, whilst 7 of the 20 weeks actually saw a percentage decrease in the number of deaths registered compared to the previous year.
The fact that 999 calls requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest, and the number of deaths among teenage boys have both seen a significant increase against the expected level, alongside the fact that myocarditis is a confirmed side effect of the Covid-19 vaccines; especially among younger males, is extremely concerning when it can be clearly seen that the increases correlate with the start of a significant amount of teens receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
The problem we now face is that approximately three million children over the age 12 are currently being offered and given the Covid-19 vaccine.
How many of those children will need to die before the authorities open their eyes and realise there is a serious problem with giving the Covid-19 vaccine to younger males, who do not even need the jab due to not being at risk of developing serious illness due to Covid-19?
The data is there now for the authorities to see, a 63% increase in male teen deaths since they started to be given the Covid-19 vaccine, they must investigate this and cease the roll-out of this experimental injection to children immediately.
 

The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. So Why Isn’t It Being Used?​

Link: https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/the-research-is-clear-ivermectin-is.html
A patient with Type 1 diabetes called to tell me the pharmacist at our local Walgreens refused to fill the prescription I had written for ivermectin, so I called to ask why.
The young pharmacist, a few years out of pharmacy school, informed me he did not understand why I was using ivermectin for early treatment of COVID because “SARS-CoV-2 does not have an exoskeleton.”
I explained I was not using ivermectin as an anti-parasitic medication, but that it had impressive data as an anti-inflammatory and anti-viral.
Furthermore, as a pediatrician, I have more than 40 years of experience managing multiple viral illnesses. There is value in treating viruses early, often with inexpensive natural remedies, rather than “staying at home until you have problems breathing then go to the hospital” as U.S. public officials have advised for COVID.
The pharmacist was not buying my initial explanation. “I am not going to fill prescriptions for ivermectin that are used in pseudo vaccine doses,” he told me.
I was surprised a young pharmacist was able to override an experienced physician’s prescription, effectively removing an inexpensive prevention and treatment option for selected patients in the middle of a pandemic.
The medical educator in me kicked in. “I would be happy to send you some references about the use of ivermectin for treatment and prevention. There are impressive studies from Argentina, Peru, Africa and India that suggest much better outcomes than we are achieving here in the U.S. with our single-minded focus on vaccines.”
He told me the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not recommend ivermectin for COVID. I asked to see the documentation and he agreed to fax it to me.
I hand-delivered 93 references and a great review article to the Walgreens.
The pharmacist faxed back a post from March 5, on the FDA website entitled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”
The next day, I received notice that a pharmacy in Northern Virginia would not fill any prescriptions for ivermectin if the diagnosis code mentioned COVID.
I had written an ivermectin prescription for a patient who has a history of bad reactions to vaccines and significant autoimmune illness. His adolescent age means that he is at very low risk of death from COVID itself.
Based on my experience as his doctor for over a decade, I was worried about potential adverse events if he got the COVID vaccine. I dug into the data about ivermectin, and it seemed like a great option for him to have on hand for early treatment of COVID if he got sick.
A pharmacist in a drug store, who never examined my patient or learned his extensive medical history, got to trump my best medical judgment by refusing to fill the prescription.
The same day, in a conversation with a compounding pharmacy, we learned of a case in which a patient’s family had to take a hospital to court to obtain treatment with ivermectin.
Bear in mind that the safety profile for ivermectin is excellent and the drug is spectacularly less expensive than the vast majority of hospital interventions.

Three days later, on a zoom call with a colleague whose parents live in Colorado, I learned that a pharmacist at a major drugstore was not only refusing to fill ivermectin for 86- and 87-year-old patients who held valid prescriptions, but the pharmacist was taking the initiative to remind the other King Soopers pharmacies in the state not to fill those prescriptions either.
My analysis of the medical literature is that ivermectin has an impressive safety record and there are multiple studies from around the globe suggesting it can decrease morbidity and mortality from COVID 19.
Two doctors who were actually in the ICU treating real patients, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory, looked at their prior experience with similarly sick patients and reviewed treatment strategies to determine what could be helpful.
As Dr. Anthony Fauci advised us to “stay home and wait for the vaccine,” frontline doctors took care of the patients before them, learning valuable lessons about what worked and what did not.
Let’s hit the highlights, quoting directly from the review paper by Kory et al, Jan 2021:
Kory and Marik compiled eight studies (three randomized controlled studies and five observational controlled studies) demonstrating efficacy in prevention of COVID-19 with significant decreased transmission.
They found 19 controlled studies that showed significant impacts on time to recovery, hospital stay, decrease in viral loads, reductions in duration of cough and decreased mortality.
In medical history pre-COVID, this body of research about ivermectin would be applauded for bringing value in the midst of a pandemic. In the medical era pre-COVID, the judgment and experience of clinicians at the patient’s bedside counted for something.
Pre-COVID, we taught medical students to use keen observational skills and keep accurate records of whether the patient improved or deteriorated after the treatment strategies used.
In the Age of COVID, pharmacists who chide doctors that “COVID does not have an exoskeleton” deny patients ivermectin — a safe, cheap, effective and potentially life-saving early treatment.
Ivermectin

If you or your patients are having trouble getting ivermectin prescriptions filled for COVID 19 prevention or treatment, see this excellent resource from the Front Line COVID 19 Critical Care Alliance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top