S
Sophia
Guest
52
These steps taken by people are largely defensive in nature.
But they are the seeds of something new that could flourish if the government decidedto make them the center piece a new peoples run economy.
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BUR402A.html
ARGENTINE PREZ FACES OFF WITH IMF/WB!
Maybe WE should do this!
Argentine President Faces off with IMF and International Financiers
by Roger Burbach
February 2004
www.globalresearch.ca 1
February 2004
The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/402A.html
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BUR402A.html
President Nestor Kirchner of Argentina is emerging as
the leading nemesis of the
International Monetar
y Fund
and the private financial speculators
in South America.
Assuming office in May 2003 with less than a quarter of the popular vote, he now enjoys 85% support in the opinion polls
due in large part to his determination to take on the neo-liberal policies that led to the country's economic collapse in 2001-2.
During the crisis,
Argentina defaulted on portions of its international debt that stands at over $140 billion.
Kirchner has now thrown the G-7 nations, the leading capitalist countries, into a quandary with his declaration that the private investors who bought about $50 billion in government bonds in Argentina
in the 1990s will receive only 25% of the face value of their bonds.
Kirchner argues the bondholders gambled on Argentina during the heady days of the corrupt, neo-liberal government of Carlos
Mene
m, when some
bonds paid upwards of 30% annual
returns.
Caring little about what these exorbitant rates meant for the Argentine people, the Kirchner
government argues the bondholders should now reap the results of their speculative adventures that helped fuel the boom and bust of the Argentine economy.
During 2002 and 2003 the IMF, the World Bank and other international financial institutions lent new funds to Argentina in hopes of keeping the country from opting out of the international financial system.
There were even signs that some of the lending institutions were backing off from their history of enforcing dramatic cutbacks in basic social programs and balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.
In early 2003, the Inter-American Development Bank lent $1.5 billion to help
shore up the country's social programs, including the special government payments of about $50 a month to the heads of household who were unemployed. Due in large part to the governmen
t's deci
sion to insist that
the domestic economy came first and that social spending needed to be increased, the country's economy in 2003 grew at 7.5% percent aft
er having
contracted by over a quarter in 2001 and 2002.
However, in February, the finance ministers of the G-7 nations who meet in Monterrey, Mexico, insisted the government must be more flexible in its debt renegotiations with the private bondholders.
Beholden to the financial and political dictates of the G-7 countries, the IMF and the World Bank are both pressuring the government to change its approach.
The IMF called the Economics Minister, Roberto Lavagna, to Washington to renegotiate the release of a loan for $8 billion later this month
while the World Bank has already held up a loan for $5 billion that was schedu
led for release on February 11.
The government however is giving few signs of budging and has hinted it may even suspend debt repayments to the IMF and the World Bank.
On
February 4,
Lavagna released a report
pointing out that these institutions continued to drain the country of financial resources even during the midst of a severe economic cr
isis.
In 2002 and 2003, they lent $9.3 billion to the country while collecting $16.6 billion in old debt.
In other words due to the repayment demands of institutions like the IMF and the World Bank the country suffered a net loss of over $7 billion.
The fact that Nestor Kirchner, a little known politician from the sparsely populated province of Santa Cruz, would take on the dominant international institutions
is due in large part to the fact that the Argentine people have rebelled against prior governments
and openly mobilized in the streets
against the payment of the foreign debt to the IMF
and its ki
ndred institutions.
A popular slogan in 2002 was Que se vayan todos,
meaning the entire political class and its international
financial backers should be to
ssed out.
<b
r>International private banks like
the Bank of Boston and
Citibank were denounced in particular for their role in precipitating the country's crisis.
The Piqueteros are the
leaders of this popular revolt.
Comprised of the underclass that is suffering the brunt of the country's 20 percent unemployment rate,
they pour into the streets blocking traffic to demand jobs,
government assistance for their families, and land to grow their own foodstuffs.
The political beliefs of the entire country have been shaken by the crisis.
Popular assemblies, cooperatives, alternative currencies,
worker-seized and run factories,
along with a host of local self-help institutions have all taken root in the country as the people strive to over
come their economic destitution.
Jose Luis Coraiggo an economics professor at the National University of General Sarmiento in Buenos Aires
who is studying the alternative economies declares:
These steps ta
ken by people are largely defensive in nat
ure.
But they are the seeds of something new that could flourish if the government decidedto make them the center piece a new peoples run economy.
Even the Fre
nch foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, who stood up to the Bush administration in the lead up to the Iraqi War,
gave a nod to the new popular institutions in a recent visit to Argentina.
He met with the Popular Assembly of San Anselmo in the province of Buenos Aires, announcing a special contribution to the Assembly's
free popular dining center as well as to its educational and cultural programs.
One of the country's most militant popular assemblies, a leader of the San Anselmo assembly told De Villepin:
We have taken the streets to end the economic model and interests t
hat has impoverished Argentines and sold out our country"‚¦
We organized the assembly because we need to resist the efforts to privatize even the politic
al spaces of participati
on.
It was not specifically mentioned at
the Assembly, but one of De Villepin's reasons for making this gesture was to try to protect French investments like the Argentine water company that was privatized during th
e Menem government.
The Piqueteros of Argentina are especially militant,
often denouncing government programs as reformist at best,
and for not going far enough to take on foreign interests and the economic groups that still dominate the country.
In early February, several groups of Piqueteros seized the Labor Ministry,
denouncing the government decision to eliminate the $50 a month payments to about 250,000 families.
This occurred on the eve of the visit of Lavagne to Washington where he was to negotiate with the IMF on the dispersal of the new loan.
Th
e government says there were
irregularities in many of these payments,
but the Piqueteros are demanding a public review of the cases of those
who were dropped from the ro
les.
For the time being Kirchner maintains his h
igh level of support,
says Manrique Salvarrey, a political journalist who also works
as a staff assistant in the Argentine congress.
But if he cedes too much to the IMF
and does not carry out fundamental economic changes, the country could witness further political eruptions from groups like the Piqueteros.
Roger Burbach is the author of The Pinochet Affair, published last year. In May, 2004 Zed Books will release a new book he wrote with Jim Tarbell, "mperial Overstretch: George W. Bush and the Hubris of Empire.
These steps taken by people are largely defensive in nature.
But they are the seeds of something new that could flourish if the government decidedto make them the center piece a new peoples run economy.
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BUR402A.html
ARGENTINE PREZ FACES OFF WITH IMF/WB!
Maybe WE should do this!
Argentine President Faces off with IMF and International Financiers
by Roger Burbach
February 2004
www.globalresearch.ca 1
February 2004
The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/402A.html
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BUR402A.html
President Nestor Kirchner of Argentina is emerging as
the leading nemesis of the
International Monetar
y Fund
and the private financial speculators
in South America.
Assuming office in May 2003 with less than a quarter of the popular vote, he now enjoys 85% support in the opinion polls
due in large part to his determination to take on the neo-liberal policies that led to the country's economic collapse in 2001-2.
During the crisis,
Argentina defaulted on portions of its international debt that stands at over $140 billion.
Kirchner has now thrown the G-7 nations, the leading capitalist countries, into a quandary with his declaration that the private investors who bought about $50 billion in government bonds in Argentina
in the 1990s will receive only 25% of the face value of their bonds.
Kirchner argues the bondholders gambled on Argentina during the heady days of the corrupt, neo-liberal government of Carlos
Mene
m, when some
bonds paid upwards of 30% annual
returns.
Caring little about what these exorbitant rates meant for the Argentine people, the Kirchner
government argues the bondholders should now reap the results of their speculative adventures that helped fuel the boom and bust of the Argentine economy.
During 2002 and 2003 the IMF, the World Bank and other international financial institutions lent new funds to Argentina in hopes of keeping the country from opting out of the international financial system.
There were even signs that some of the lending institutions were backing off from their history of enforcing dramatic cutbacks in basic social programs and balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.
In early 2003, the Inter-American Development Bank lent $1.5 billion to help
shore up the country's social programs, including the special government payments of about $50 a month to the heads of household who were unemployed. Due in large part to the governmen
t's deci
sion to insist that
the domestic economy came first and that social spending needed to be increased, the country's economy in 2003 grew at 7.5% percent aft
er having
contracted by over a quarter in 2001 and 2002.
However, in February, the finance ministers of the G-7 nations who meet in Monterrey, Mexico, insisted the government must be more flexible in its debt renegotiations with the private bondholders.
Beholden to the financial and political dictates of the G-7 countries, the IMF and the World Bank are both pressuring the government to change its approach.
The IMF called the Economics Minister, Roberto Lavagna, to Washington to renegotiate the release of a loan for $8 billion later this month
while the World Bank has already held up a loan for $5 billion that was schedu
led for release on February 11.
The government however is giving few signs of budging and has hinted it may even suspend debt repayments to the IMF and the World Bank.
On
February 4,
Lavagna released a report
pointing out that these institutions continued to drain the country of financial resources even during the midst of a severe economic cr
isis.
In 2002 and 2003, they lent $9.3 billion to the country while collecting $16.6 billion in old debt.
In other words due to the repayment demands of institutions like the IMF and the World Bank the country suffered a net loss of over $7 billion.
The fact that Nestor Kirchner, a little known politician from the sparsely populated province of Santa Cruz, would take on the dominant international institutions
is due in large part to the fact that the Argentine people have rebelled against prior governments
and openly mobilized in the streets
against the payment of the foreign debt to the IMF
and its ki
ndred institutions.
A popular slogan in 2002 was Que se vayan todos,
meaning the entire political class and its international
financial backers should be to
ssed out.
<b
r>International private banks like
the Bank of Boston and
Citibank were denounced in particular for their role in precipitating the country's crisis.
The Piqueteros are the
leaders of this popular revolt.
Comprised of the underclass that is suffering the brunt of the country's 20 percent unemployment rate,
they pour into the streets blocking traffic to demand jobs,
government assistance for their families, and land to grow their own foodstuffs.
The political beliefs of the entire country have been shaken by the crisis.
Popular assemblies, cooperatives, alternative currencies,
worker-seized and run factories,
along with a host of local self-help institutions have all taken root in the country as the people strive to over
come their economic destitution.
Jose Luis Coraiggo an economics professor at the National University of General Sarmiento in Buenos Aires
who is studying the alternative economies declares:
These steps ta
ken by people are largely defensive in nat
ure.
But they are the seeds of something new that could flourish if the government decidedto make them the center piece a new peoples run economy.
Even the Fre
nch foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, who stood up to the Bush administration in the lead up to the Iraqi War,
gave a nod to the new popular institutions in a recent visit to Argentina.
He met with the Popular Assembly of San Anselmo in the province of Buenos Aires, announcing a special contribution to the Assembly's
free popular dining center as well as to its educational and cultural programs.
One of the country's most militant popular assemblies, a leader of the San Anselmo assembly told De Villepin:
We have taken the streets to end the economic model and interests t
hat has impoverished Argentines and sold out our country"‚¦
We organized the assembly because we need to resist the efforts to privatize even the politic
al spaces of participati
on.
It was not specifically mentioned at
the Assembly, but one of De Villepin's reasons for making this gesture was to try to protect French investments like the Argentine water company that was privatized during th
e Menem government.
The Piqueteros of Argentina are especially militant,
often denouncing government programs as reformist at best,
and for not going far enough to take on foreign interests and the economic groups that still dominate the country.
In early February, several groups of Piqueteros seized the Labor Ministry,
denouncing the government decision to eliminate the $50 a month payments to about 250,000 families.
This occurred on the eve of the visit of Lavagne to Washington where he was to negotiate with the IMF on the dispersal of the new loan.
Th
e government says there were
irregularities in many of these payments,
but the Piqueteros are demanding a public review of the cases of those
who were dropped from the ro
les.
For the time being Kirchner maintains his h
igh level of support,
says Manrique Salvarrey, a political journalist who also works
as a staff assistant in the Argentine congress.
But if he cedes too much to the IMF
and does not carry out fundamental economic changes, the country could witness further political eruptions from groups like the Piqueteros.
Roger Burbach is the author of The Pinochet Affair, published last year. In May, 2004 Zed Books will release a new book he wrote with Jim Tarbell, "mperial Overstretch: George W. Bush and the Hubris of Empire.