S
Sophia
Guest
5
The date on this post is January 15, 2004. I do believe, that; Soon, the Constitutional Convention will address these issues.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=42909
The issues being raised by all these states commenced in the 1994-95-96 et cetera years when FEDERAL FUNDING was cut off from PARK SERVICES.
These issues have concerned many Americans since the FED. GOVT. decreased the SERVICES for which the TAX PAYERS WERE PAYING.
(end snip)
http://www.rumormillnews.c
m/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=47639
Literally, there is no need to secede,
because the Thing they want to secede from is _not_ "the union of sovereign States" -
it's &quo
t;t
e machinations of a corporate entity calling itself 'the U.S.'
and _pretending_ to be that unions federal government in all its branches".
As we wake up to that, the game is up. :lol:
There are a few dubious Amendments to the Constitution; those should be carefully considered, their meanings fully understood - and then perhaps those should be repealed,
or perhaps it should be realized they were never lawfully enacted in the first place and perhaps in such case, they can simply be dropped as 'bogus'.
There's no need for a Constitutional Convention - the Constitution ain't broke.
Rather, just like all the other shenanigans the would-be-Elites have pulled, there's an _overlay_ of something, operating on top of the Constitution ,
and it's tha
t overlay
that
needs to
be removed.
ANY CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION SHOULD BE APPROACHED VERY, VERY CAUTIOUSLY, because any group effort to 'revise' that brilliant document would be available for mischief.
We have Amendments right now that don't do what we've been led to think they do.
So the essential quest
ion becomes, "If we haven't spotted those and the bogus nature of them, do we yet know enough, see clearly enough, to be sure changes we might make to the Constitution now are necessary and also crafted with sufficient precision to accomplish exactly what we intend them to, no more and no less?"
--hobie
The date on this post is January 15, 2004. I do believe, that; Soon, the Constitutional Convention will address these issues.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=42909
The issues being raised by all these states commenced in the 1994-95-96 et cetera years when FEDERAL FUNDING was cut off from PARK SERVICES.
These issues have concerned many Americans since the FED. GOVT. decreased the SERVICES for which the TAX PAYERS WERE PAYING.
(end snip)
http://www.rumormillnews.c
m/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=47639
Literally, there is no need to secede,
because the Thing they want to secede from is _not_ "the union of sovereign States" -
it's &quo
t;t
e machinations of a corporate entity calling itself 'the U.S.'
and _pretending_ to be that unions federal government in all its branches".
As we wake up to that, the game is up. :lol:
There are a few dubious Amendments to the Constitution; those should be carefully considered, their meanings fully understood - and then perhaps those should be repealed,
or perhaps it should be realized they were never lawfully enacted in the first place and perhaps in such case, they can simply be dropped as 'bogus'.
There's no need for a Constitutional Convention - the Constitution ain't broke.
Rather, just like all the other shenanigans the would-be-Elites have pulled, there's an _overlay_ of something, operating on top of the Constitution ,
and it's tha
t overlay
that
needs to
be removed.
ANY CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION SHOULD BE APPROACHED VERY, VERY CAUTIOUSLY, because any group effort to 'revise' that brilliant document would be available for mischief.
We have Amendments right now that don't do what we've been led to think they do.
So the essential quest
ion becomes, "If we haven't spotted those and the bogus nature of them, do we yet know enough, see clearly enough, to be sure changes we might make to the Constitution now are necessary and also crafted with sufficient precision to accomplish exactly what we intend them to, no more and no less?"
--hobie
