Apollonian
Guest Columnist
Below-copied essay by ap submitted, but censored/deleted by kike, Unz, at https://www.unz.com/article/the-log...-true-intentions-of-the-left/#comment-5094911
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
U're just another who too easily misses the simple pt. to that dear Christian myth which has now taken its rightful place held formerly by Illiad and Oddysey, by Homer. So note the context of the myth in Judea, where Pharisee sect, composed of maybe 5% of the pop., presumed and pretended to lead the middle-class party, the Pharisees who later wrote the Talmud, leading the "Jews" (not Judeans, "Jews" referring to that 5%, followers of Pharisees).
Thus Pharisees featured the "Oral Law Trad." (Gosp. MARK 7:9-13) and "midrash" (interpretation) by which they understood and construed Torah and Mosaic Law--and then everything else too. Thus Torah means ONLY what rabbis say, as now in Talmud and some other "holy" writings. Hence we see Jews actually follow a general philosophy of SUBJECTIVISM (by midrash "interpretation") determined by rabbis according to what they see is "good of Jews."
Thus "midrash" becomes the Judaic (NOT Judean) "party-line" to be held and applied collectivistically by Jew (not Judean) people as a whole. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best expo on Talmud, etc.
Note further, subjectivism holds reality is product of consciousness/mentality, making subject to be creator, God-like--Satanism by definition--which Christ rejected. Satanism is actually just this same subjectivism taken to extreme. Thus Christ posed himself and teachings as TRUTH; see Gosp. JOHN 14:6--thus Christ affirms there's such thing as truth, u see.
And the pt. then is that truth necessarily can only be what is verified by the objective reality, in accord w. Aristotle, for example. All Christian ETHICS then follows logically, those ethics, most dramatic and dramatized in New Test., which took the world by storm, respected and revered by all peoples, races, and cultures, throughout the world.
Thus Pharisees CONSPIRED to kill Christ, imagining thus they would secure their satanic/subjectivist imperium, such as it is, within the minds of frail humanity, but the myth goes on to teach that truth always RESURRECTS, coming back to bite severely, the joke being upon Jews, Satanists, liars, subjectivists, et al. Thus the real God is TRUTH, and for it people must be prepared to suffer, "bearing their cross," and even to die for it, like Christ--a gripping, compelling, heroic story expressed within the myth, within the written text of New Test.
And hence we see now the Hegelian ANTI-THESES, Judaic lies (Gosp. JOHN 8:44) vs. Christian truth--subjective vs. objective. Such then is the basic PHILOSOPHY of Christianity presented by and within the "religious"/mythic vehicle. "Faith" only properly means LOYALTY, not beeeeleeevin'--as if such beeeleeeving makes something true. Most people can't grasp strict logic or philosophy, hence need and demand "religion" which makes things more palatable for them.
Thus the pertinent Christian philosophy is plain enough within the text of New Test., but obviously it is only for the few who can grasp that philosophy--maybe 5-10% of people generally. The religion, however, is there for everyone, beginning w. the myth for the small children, and remaining for those who have such difficulty thinking--which seems to be most people even later in life, who may never learn to appreciate philosophy, ethics, or science, etc.
-------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------------
52. anonymous[811] • Disclaimer says:
January 1, 2022 at 2:14 pm GMT • 5.4 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Towey
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So, swoon all over the “beauty” of your pagan polytheist nonsense.
As far as convincing people of Christianity’s “objective truth,” that would be an impossible task. You probably don’t even understand the meaning of “objective.”
You have as much chance of objectively proving the so-called Father and the Son, and the ghost too, as hindoos have about proving Shiva, or the Greek/Nords… you get the drift.
Don’t bring a book to the debate. That would be pathetic.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Core Philosophy Within Mythic/"Religious" Vehicle--Which Most People Demand
(Apollonian, 1 Jan 22)
(Apollonian, 1 Jan 22)
U're just another who too easily misses the simple pt. to that dear Christian myth which has now taken its rightful place held formerly by Illiad and Oddysey, by Homer. So note the context of the myth in Judea, where Pharisee sect, composed of maybe 5% of the pop., presumed and pretended to lead the middle-class party, the Pharisees who later wrote the Talmud, leading the "Jews" (not Judeans, "Jews" referring to that 5%, followers of Pharisees).
Thus Pharisees featured the "Oral Law Trad." (Gosp. MARK 7:9-13) and "midrash" (interpretation) by which they understood and construed Torah and Mosaic Law--and then everything else too. Thus Torah means ONLY what rabbis say, as now in Talmud and some other "holy" writings. Hence we see Jews actually follow a general philosophy of SUBJECTIVISM (by midrash "interpretation") determined by rabbis according to what they see is "good of Jews."
Thus "midrash" becomes the Judaic (NOT Judean) "party-line" to be held and applied collectivistically by Jew (not Judean) people as a whole. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best expo on Talmud, etc.
Note further, subjectivism holds reality is product of consciousness/mentality, making subject to be creator, God-like--Satanism by definition--which Christ rejected. Satanism is actually just this same subjectivism taken to extreme. Thus Christ posed himself and teachings as TRUTH; see Gosp. JOHN 14:6--thus Christ affirms there's such thing as truth, u see.
And the pt. then is that truth necessarily can only be what is verified by the objective reality, in accord w. Aristotle, for example. All Christian ETHICS then follows logically, those ethics, most dramatic and dramatized in New Test., which took the world by storm, respected and revered by all peoples, races, and cultures, throughout the world.
Thus Pharisees CONSPIRED to kill Christ, imagining thus they would secure their satanic/subjectivist imperium, such as it is, within the minds of frail humanity, but the myth goes on to teach that truth always RESURRECTS, coming back to bite severely, the joke being upon Jews, Satanists, liars, subjectivists, et al. Thus the real God is TRUTH, and for it people must be prepared to suffer, "bearing their cross," and even to die for it, like Christ--a gripping, compelling, heroic story expressed within the myth, within the written text of New Test.
And hence we see now the Hegelian ANTI-THESES, Judaic lies (Gosp. JOHN 8:44) vs. Christian truth--subjective vs. objective. Such then is the basic PHILOSOPHY of Christianity presented by and within the "religious"/mythic vehicle. "Faith" only properly means LOYALTY, not beeeeleeevin'--as if such beeeleeeving makes something true. Most people can't grasp strict logic or philosophy, hence need and demand "religion" which makes things more palatable for them.
Thus the pertinent Christian philosophy is plain enough within the text of New Test., but obviously it is only for the few who can grasp that philosophy--maybe 5-10% of people generally. The religion, however, is there for everyone, beginning w. the myth for the small children, and remaining for those who have such difficulty thinking--which seems to be most people even later in life, who may never learn to appreciate philosophy, ethics, or science, etc.
-------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------------
52. anonymous[811] • Disclaimer says:
January 1, 2022 at 2:14 pm GMT • 5.4 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Towey
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So, swoon all over the “beauty” of your pagan polytheist nonsense.
As far as convincing people of Christianity’s “objective truth,” that would be an impossible task. You probably don’t even understand the meaning of “objective.”
You have as much chance of objectively proving the so-called Father and the Son, and the ghost too, as hindoos have about proving Shiva, or the Greek/Nords… you get the drift.
Don’t bring a book to the debate. That would be pathetic.