"Racial 'EQUITY'" is just code for discrimination against whites, suckers--get a clue, morons

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Running Ads in Georgia Highlighting Democrats’ Anti-White Bigotry​

by Chris Menahan | Information Liberation
November 3rd 2022, 5:58 am

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/step...ia-highlighting-democrats-anti-white-bigotry/

Former President Trump advisor Stephen Miller is running ads in Georgia highlighting how Democrats have embraced anti-white bigotry and open anti-white discrimination.

An ad being run in Georgia by Stephen Miller’s group: America First Legal. pic.twitter.com/tIeUHGYZoB
— Waleed Shahid (@_waleedshahid) November 2, 2022

“When did racism against white people become OK?” the ad from Miller’s America First Legal begins. “Joe Biden put white people last in line for Covid relief funds. Kamala Harris said disaster aid should go to non-white citizens first. Liberal politicians block access to medicine based on skin color. Progressive corporations, airlines, and universities all openly discriminate against white Americans. Racism is always wrong. The left’s anti-white bigotry must stop. We are all entitled to equal treatment under the law.”

miller-ads-anti-white-discrimination.jpg

America First Legal is also running radio ads highlighting the Democrats’ efforts to sterilize children and mutilate their genitals in the name of “transgenderism.”

Democrats are calling for the ads to be banned because telling the truth about what they’re doing to us is “hate” and a form of “violence.”

From Politico:

America First Legal has made more than $4 million in radio buys across Atlanta, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Detroit — cities in competitive states with significant Black populations. The radio ad features a man speaking over ominous music, claiming that children have been pushed to take puberty blockers and get gender-affirming surgery.
“The Biden administration is pushing radical gender experiments on children,” the narrator says in the original radio spot. “Tell Joe Biden and left-wing leaders across America, ‘Hands off our kids.'”
NAACP president Derrick Johnson said the organization sent letters to radio stations asking them not to run the ad, which he called “the worst I’ve seen” on the issue this cycle.
“This is playing to the lowest common denominator of hate and otherizing, targeting the LGBT community,” Johnson said. “When you create this type of negative reaction to individuals who [don’t] present any societal grief, you only create space for people to feel justified for attacking them physically and through public policy.”
Derrick Johnson was part of the Elon Musk call where Musk told the ADL and other “civil society leaders” that he’ll scrap his commitment to free speech.

America First Legal vice president and general counsel Gene Hamilton defended the radio ad. “The Biden Administration and its allies are advancing a radical agenda that denies biology, denies reality, and denies that they are threatening children,” he said in a statement. “We believe in biology and we believe that confused children should not be harmed permanently by individuals with radical agendas.”
Democrats are allowed to openly (and illegally) discriminate against whites and mutilate children’s genitals but you’re not allowed to talk about it.

This is a perfect example of why Musk’s futile attempt to find a middle ground with these lunatics will never work.

Being attacked by both right & left simultaneously is a good sign
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 2, 2022
 

Report: 58 of the nation's top 100 medical schools force mandatory CRT-related programs​

November 29, 2022 News

Link: http://www.madnesshub.com/2022/11/report-58-of-nations-top-100-medical.html

A recent report by CriticalRace.org found that 58 of the top 100 medical schools in the United States force mandatory student training or assignments related to critical race theory, Fox News Digital reported.
CriticalRace.org is a project by the Legal Insurrection Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to promoting free speech, that has been monitoring critical race theory coursework and training found on college campuses across the nation.
The report found that 58 top medical schools promote the controversial idea that racism is systemic in the United States. Specifically, mandatory department training was found at 14 schools, school-wide training at 31, and school-wide coursework at 41. It also discovered that 38 of the top 100 schools require CRT-related training for staff.
The online database breaks down the specific training and coursework found at each school.
William Jacobson, a clinical professor of law at Cornell Law School and founder of CriticalRace.org, told Fox News Digital, "Medical School education is in crisis, with 'social justice' and race-focused activism being imposed on students, faculty, and staff."

"Approaching the doctor-patient relationship through a Critical Race lens is being implemented under the umbrella of 'Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion' and other euphemisms, such as Ibram Kendi's 'anti-racism' approach," Jacobson added. "'White privilege' and similar concepts, pushed by Robin DiAngelo and others, are being infused into the medical school culture."

CriticalRace.org defined CRT-related training and curricula as any school program that uses terms including "anti-racism," "cultural competency," "equity," "implicit bias," or "DEI – diversity, equity and inclusion."
"A patient-centric ethos is being drowned out by politics and activism," Jacobson said. "Because there are only just over 150 accredited medical schools in the U.S., and they are so hard to get into, students really have no options. Unlike universities and colleges, where students may be able to avoid a race-obsessed campus climate, with medical schools students have to submit to race-focused medical education or give up their career hopes."
Jacobson stated that this should "be a wake-up call to lawmakers" and insisted that the House of Representatives "hold hearings on the destructive racialization of medical schools and medicine."
CriticalRace.org also reported on CRT-related programs in K-12 private schools, 500 undergraduate programs, and military academies in the United States. The database found that 236 colleges across the nation require student training or coursework with CRT themes.
 

Biden’s Executive Order on Equity: It Will Create Greater Inequality​

by Dan De La Vega | Mises Institute
March 6th 2023, 1:07 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bidens-executive-order-on-equity-it-will-create-greater-inequality/

Although Biden’s order is a far cry from a Soviet-style central committee, the key takeaway is that equity constitutes a threat to the rule of law, especially the fourteenth amendment.

On February 16, 2023, President Joe Biden issued his second executive order to strengthen equity within federal agencies. Among other things, it ordered them to install equity officers and implement action plans with the superficial aim of making it easier for “underserved communities” to access federal resources.

Although there is plenty of commentary on the specific content of the new order, that is not what this article is about. Rather, the purpose of this article is to familiarize readers with the ideology behind equity. I do not intend, however, to come across as a doomsayer who believes all is lost. There are, after all, signs of improvement.


To begin with, it should be noted that equity isn’t unique to government. I am only highlighting the Biden administration because the executive branch is one of the most powerful institutions in the United States. Schools are another institution that consecrate equity. And although equity is usually referenced through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), I will only focus on equity because it is the ultimate objective that the other letters are meant to serve.

First, let’s look at how the Biden administration defines equity. It is defined in section ten as, “The consistent and systematic treatment of all individuals in a fair, just, and impartial manner, including individuals who belong to communities that often have been denied such treatment.”

That doesn’t sound so bad, right? But one must ask: why is the word “just” there? Federal agencies should certainly be fair and impartial in carrying out their duties, but what does it mean for an office bureaucrat to do their duties in a just manner when, say, reviewing a student loan application? Moreover, why are community affiliations at the center of analysis? One would think that in disaster situations, such as the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, the primary metric for obtaining aid is individual need. Alas, no.

Despite the inoffensive sentiment, the words do not mean what the average person thinks they mean. Rather, words like fair and just have special meaning to equity officers. You see, equity is informed by neo-Marxist thoughts, such as critical race theory (CRT) among others. These theories seek to draw a straight line from observed injustices to the institutions of society itself. That is, they argue that oppression is not only ordinary but emerges directly from society’s structure. Thus, correcting injustices becomes an exercise in changing all of society, hence Biden’s call for a whole-of-government solution.

In his writings, Karl Marx articulated structurally determined oppression by linking it to the division of labor under capitalism. Today, Marx’s division of labor has been updated and repackaged as systemic racism, which makes an appearance in the first sentence of the new executive order. In this context, systemic racism is posited as the ordinary state of affairs that structures and determines all social relations. Additionally, Marx’s concept of the proletariat has been replaced by “people of color,” or “marginalized communities.” Indeed, as the name suggests, many strains of neo-Marxism lazily recycle legacy code and give it new names.

In short, the relevant point is that words like fairness or justice take on unique meanings in the Marxist worldview. To see how these words change meaning, it will be helpful to use a case study.


In June 2021, a federal judge halted the Biden administration’s policy of issuing aid to farmers based on race. The judge ruled that the policy was likely a violation of the plaintiff’s equal protection rights. However, Biden’s agricultural secretary, Tom Vilsack, defended the policy: “We know for a fact that socially disadvantaged producers were discriminated against by the United States . . . We have reimbursed people in the past for those acts of discrimination, but we’ve never absolutely dealt with the cumulative effect.” (italics added)

What Vilsack is saying is that violating equal protection today is equitable if it corrects past injustices. Notice also that past injustices include insufficient restitution. And of course, sufficiency is subjective. Moreover, given the “cumulative effect” of injustice, equitable correction means going beyond parity and creating a deliberate imbalance in favor of marginalized identity groups, hence the overt racism. That is, justice cannot be realized until the oppressed have been uplifted and the oppressor has seen the world from the standpoint of the oppressed, a task that requires coercion.

Relatedly, this belief in asymmetric redistribution is what Ruth Bader Ginsburg was referring to when she called for an all-female supreme court. It also helps explain why California’s proposed reparations plan is so gratuitous, despite the fact that California was never a slave state.

CRT celebrity Ibram Kendi puts the matter more bluntly: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”

This ugly conclusion flows from the belief that there is no such thing as a neutral application of law or policy. There are only racist or antiracist ways of running society. There are no gray areas. As a result, this radically changes the meaning of terms like fairness and justice.

To you or me, fairness and justice gain meaning when we adopt the rule of law to settle our conflicts where we face one another as dignified equals. But in CRT, the rule of law is racist because it has a hidden purpose of granting a special type of property called whiteness (capital under Marx) to white people. To solve this perceived problem, rule by discretion must be implemented where self-anointed mandarins like Kendi are empowered to reorder society. Consequently, concepts like justice are no longer impartial processes, but are instead an engineered state of affairs crafted by our enlightened betters.

To summarize, the ideology behind equity seeks to weaken the rule of law in favor of arbitrary discretion where you don’t get what you need. Instead, you get what is deserved, according to the haruspicy of a mystic council. Historically, the high priests have deemed the bourgeois to be deserving of privation and retribution.

Equity is better understood as a perpetual process of modifying societal “shares” between identity groups such that power is rebalanced to achieve justice. This process requires a system of top-down political economy where authority is centralized within a council of experts that don’t have skin in the game; the Russian word is soviet. Equity, therefore, can never be a positive-sum game because the centralized authority only reallocates existing shares, not create new ones. Thus, we must conclude that equity only equalizes downward. This description also holds outside the government context and explains discrimination against minorities like Asian-American students.

Although Biden’s order is a far cry from a Soviet-style central committee, the key takeaway is that equity constitutes a threat to the rule of law, especially the fourteenth amendment. We will have to see how the judiciary handles this challenge. However, the problem in the interim is that equity is moving ahead at full speed and lawsuits take time to bear fruit. In other words, the span of time between harm now and future restitution is sufficiently large enough for many people to be needlessly injured in the name of a pestilent ideology.



CDC Confirms That Majority of Fatal Covid Vaccines Were Knowingly Sent to Red States
 
Simple, blatant, flat-out treason, satanic insanity, and no one bats an eye--shows how utterly stupid the mass of goons are in Jew S A, and why we have a brain-dead, pervert and criminal as top executive of fed. gov. doing what he's told by satanic psychopaths and masterminds, suckers.

 
Back
Top